![]() |
![]() |
||
|
A Cut-and-Paste Foreign PolicyPosted on Aug 13, 2008By Joe Conason The discovery that John McCain’s remarks on Georgia were derived from Wikipedia is, to put it politely, disturbing and even depressing—but not surprising. Under the tutelage of the neoconservatives, who revealed their superficial understanding of Iraq both before and after the invasion, he favors bellicose grandstanding over strategic thinking. So why delve deeper than a quick Google search? Worse still, neither he nor his advisers yet grasp how our misadventure in Mesopotamia has diminished American power and prestige. In fact, the Wikipedia episode—an awful embarrassment that would have devastated the presidential campaign of Barack Obama or any other Democrat—revealed an underlying weakness in Sen. McCain’s vaunted grasp of foreign policy. Still enthralled by an exhausted ideology, he seems unable to analyze how we can avoid manipulation by allies or adversaries while advancing our own real interests. Those interests include the cultivation of democracy but also the promotion of regional stability and international security. Pretending to confront Russia from a position of weakness doesn’t help. Frankly, the Arizona Republican’s latest foray onto the world stage suggested that he is not quite ready for the responsibilities of the presidency. When he emphasized that Georgia was “one of the world’s first nations to adopt Christianity as an official religion,” he sounded like a politician who will gladly damage our global influence merely for the sake of pandering to his partisan base. Certainly the propagandists of al-Qaida must have been pleased to hear an ally of President Bush confirm that the United States is engaged in a worldwide crusade, for that is how such words are interpreted by Muslims. (And since when does American policy prefer nations for adopting any “official religion,” Christian or otherwise?) This was rhetorical blundering worthy of the Bush White House. Advertisement Without any prejudice to the cause of Georgia’s sovereignty or its democratic aspirations, the true answer is not much, despite the illusions that our policy evidently encouraged among the Georgian leadership and people. Blustering aside, there was never the slightest chance that Europe or the United States would come to their assistance with military force against Russian troops. There are many reasons to avoid such a disaster, notably the enormous Russian nuclear arsenal, the European dependence on Russian energy supplies and the cataclysmic effect on the world economy. Even if we contemplated the use of force, we scarcely have the capacity after squandering our power in Iraq. We can hardly bring effective diplomatic force to bear, either, beyond the tinny echo of White House blustering. The Russians must have laughed as they watched Georgian troops depart in haste from Iraq—and cackled when the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations accused them of seeking “regime change” in Tbilisi. Are we telling them they cannot just invade a country they dislike, without international sanction, because they feel threatened? There can be no doubt that Vladimir Putin’s Russia poses a challenge to the West, and to the next administration. It can be argued that Russian ambitions must be checked now to discourage Moscow’s bullying imperialism. It can also be argued that bringing the former Soviet republics into NATO only provokes the Russians into resisting encirclement by their Cold War enemies, and that we must engage Russia to cope with existential threats like nuclear proliferation and Islamist extremism. What can no longer be sanely argued is that reflexive ideology and confrontational bluster will secure our future. We desperately need a new foreign policy that combines idealism with realism. And a president who doesn’t lift his talking points from Wikipedia. Joe Conason writes for The New York Observer. © 2008 Creators Syndicate Inc. Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By omop, August 16, 2008 at 7:44 pm #
With all due respect to Senators McCain and Obama for a slightly biased off the cuff remark or two. First: John McCain reminds one of Herman’s Wouk characters by the name of Captain Queeg. Second: Barak Obama reminds one that if elected President all 300 million Americans will whether they admit or not that, feel a little more prouder and confidant about calling themselves just Plain American. Un hyphenated or adjectivised.
The foreign policy [if you want to call it that] of the US has over the years become romanticised and made into a comic book version of zionist/trotskyite/neocon/chickenhawks living in some fantasyland where wars and plans are prepared promoted and played out in air conditioned offices subject to money pressures from lobbies one of whom is more dedicated to a partial loyalty to the USA.
Them days is over period. This is the 21st Century whether Queeg McCain said or not.
Report thisBy walldizo, August 16, 2008 at 5:31 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Great piece.Time to realise that unipolar hegemony has reached its bottom.Therefore, its approprate to search for a reality-based foreign policy.Georgia,is but another example of the US failed policy in alluring its political cronies into believing that with American support, they can do whatever they want,just like Israel,only to discover that power has a limit.Caucas is a turbulent poltical arena where any adventurous behavior may probably ignite a war that no body wants.MCcain’s 101 poltical course might just do that
Report thisBy Dennis Moss, August 16, 2008 at 4:18 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
As we look back in history, we may ask what was the events that brought down the old Soviet empire? The corp media would have you believe it was the Reagan policies , such as tear down that wall!
Report thisLet me suggest it was an economy going into the toilet that occurred though their overspending on their military and foreign incursions.There was so much unrest as to maintaining troops in various onclaves annexed into the soviet sphere after WWII. that they could not afford to hold onto these sovereign entities, thus causing the break up, of the old Soviet Union. The final straw was the occupation of Afghanistan, where in time and by material support from the west it broke the back of the communist economy. We now live with a revisionist accounting of the cause of the break-up.
The irony is that is what is happening to our economy, Putin took real good notes and bidded his time now they are doing the same thing to us. pay back is a B——in our incursion into Afghanistan. It is almost exactly what is occurring today to our economy. You find now that the price of oil being at record heights, This has poured revenue into the Russian economy. The Soviets are now seeking their revenge on us by supporting the Muslim fighters in that area which is costing us our treasure, Europe can’t, won’t, help us out because of their dependence on Soviet Oil and gas. We will be made to retrench as more and more countries refuse to accept further debt from us as the value of the dollar drops. Our southern border is ripe for invasion from the south and we will be unable to stop this,
By FlamingLib, August 15, 2008 at 7:43 pm #
I don’t know why nobody has commented on the timing of the Georgian affair. When 24/7 takes its attention off Iraq and Obama, giving the public *pan et circenses* in Beijing the better to distract our short attention span, Putin uses the real news vacuum to influence U.S. presidential politics. Paranoid that I am, I smell a deal. Perhaps Karl Rove was in Tbiblisi when he left the country to avoid Senate summons. If Bush has a cozy relationship with Saakashvili, trouble in the demilitarized zone such as persecution of ethnic Russians, could make McShame look like a better leader in Cold War II.
As I put it in my blog, it’s “Let’s Trade ‘Wag the Dogs.’” I suspect the GOPS are just that desperate to give Bush a third term.
Report thisBy Reubenesque, August 15, 2008 at 3:07 am #
Using Wiki huh? Hell, the neocon bastards probably wrote up and contributed the piece in the first place. Wiki is user supplied content you know.
Report thisBy samosamo, August 14, 2008 at 4:38 pm #
I wouldn’t expect anything less from someone that is even below w’s ‘c’ grade which makes w appear to be a genuine einsteins. Or ole johnny is smarter because he completed the military school, who knows? So we definitely know what types the neocons want running on their ticket. Look for the box under ole johnny’s coat from now on until the election is over. I would think there will not be any debates until both conventions have to play through before the debates start.
Report thisAgain, that would make it appear that obama would have an intellectual advantage but who knows?
By Gmonst, August 14, 2008 at 12:59 pm #
That is a good statement. I can’t tell you how often the interrelations between countries reminds me of my school-yard days. I feel like as nations we are just children. We seem incapable of reaching a level of maturity that would be considered rudimentary in our personal day to day lives. If individuals behaved like countries we would get into fights every time we left the house. I would raid my neighbor’s house with a hot-tub, just to secure my “interests.”
Report thisBy Fadel Abdallah, August 14, 2008 at 12:42 pm #
McCain-the-Insane says in his posturing defense of Georgia : one of the worlds first nations to adopt Christianity as an official religion,
Here you have it: A Medieval thinking Crusader who is the best that half-America (neocons/republicans) can find to become its second insane president in the twenty-first century!
Joe Conason is being the typical mainstream journalist who cannot get himself to call a spade a spade, opting instead to call McCain’s evil and Medieval thinking as “exhausted ideology.”
Thank you Russia for hastening the departure of the Georgian occupation Crusaders from Iraq!
Report thisBy southparker, August 14, 2008 at 12:24 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I am so happy to see that the irony of this situation is not lost on some. I’ve spent the last few days listening to various “statements” by our political leaders and feeling like I’m in an alternate reality. Rice saying times have changed…you can’t just go waltzing into a sovereign nation and force it’s government out, etc. What!!! Does she mean this as a veiled suggestion to Russia, that based on our experience this won’t work? Or that it’s morally wrong and we won’t stand for it and she really doesn’t think our occupation of Iraq was just this type of incident? It’s such a huge case of “do as we say, not as we do” that I am appalled. And it’s fast turning into a comedy of the absurd with Georgian president making these insane assurances to his countrymen that America will be here soon with help. He poked the bear, what did he expect would happen? This country’s foreign policy is nothing more than schoolyard bully tactics. It’s embarrassing.
Report thisBy Stephen Smoliar, August 14, 2008 at 11:14 am #
I just finished trying to collect my thoughts at:
http://therehearsalstudio.blogspot.com/2008/08/dangerous-knowledge.html
Report thisBy Big B, August 14, 2008 at 10:31 am #
Jackpine,
Report thisI too agree that our future foreign policy should be all about the preservation of good food. This may mean we have to preserve Italy and France, but toss down a couple of eclairs or a cannoli, and they will seem worth the sacrifice.
By Big B, August 14, 2008 at 9:52 am #
Georgian’s have learned a couple of valuable lessons in the prior week. First, Nuclear powers never confront each other directly (nukes have oddly enough kept Pakistan and India from all out war for years. They did the same for the US and old Soviet Union). Second, US based neocons will arm you and train you and drop you off at the beach. They will say “don’t worry, we’ll be right behind you!” Then when the bullet’s start flying you will find out the awful truth, that while your men are dying for their stilted ideaology, they will be holed up in a 4 star hotel in Montenegro, sipping champange and avoiding your desperate phone calls.(I realize that is a mixed Cuba/Georgia metaphor, but you get the point)
Report thisWe are just begining to see why we are pushing for a new missle defense system in eastern Europe. Be it over oil or hegemony, we have begun poking a stick in the russian bears’ ass again. This may all be part of the master plan to revive the cold war. Step one, somehow prod the Russkies into spending some of their massive oil revenue on a massive military build-up. Just ask your average neocon, a strong russian military is good for America.
By jackpine savage, August 14, 2008 at 9:02 am #
So perhaps it is germane to the issue that Jason and the Argonauts went to Georgia in search of the Golden Fleece as well.
Is the fact that Stalin, Beria and a few other all-stars of the Soviet Union were Georgian have any bearing on this?
The food is delicious (though the wine is terrible). In my mind, the United States should vigorously defend any country that produces delicious food.
Report thisBy Paolo, August 14, 2008 at 8:56 am #
Perhaps unwittingly, Joe Conason reveals why both Democrats and Republicans are dead wrong in their approaches to foreign policy.
Observe a few key phrases: McCain “favors bellicose grandstanding over strategic thinking.” Now certainly, no one wants a president who favors “bellicose grandstanding.” But do we really want instead a president who favors “strategic thinking?”
As a libertarian, I don’t want a president doing either. “Strategic thinking” implies that it is the role of the US to play one nation against another, to take sides in other countries’ squabbles, to nudge international events one way or the other to put the US military in a better “strategic” position.
An ideal president would follow Washington’s advice to stay out of foreign quarrels, and Jefferson’s advice to have friendly trade relations with all nations, but entangling alliances with none.
A dispute between Georgia and Russia is entirely their own affair. The US, on the far side of the globe, should mind its own business.
It seems that the only difference between Dems and Reps in foreign policy is where we should intervene. The Dems want to intervene in places like Bosnia and Kosovo and Darfur. The Reps want to intervene in Iraq, Iran, and (probably) Georgia.
We don’t own the world, folks.
Report thisBy Tim, August 14, 2008 at 4:50 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Great to see an article by an american who is not completely divorced from reality.A unipolar ameri-world is a fantasists pipedream. The neocons should check into rehab and learn: Denile is not just a ribber in africa.
Report this