Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
June 18, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     nsa     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Reporter Who Brought Down the 'Runaway General' Dead at 33

The Terror Con

Nate Silver vs. Politico: It's on Again

IRS Conspiracy Theory Debunked, Rand Paul Answers Cheney Criticism, and More

The Making of a Global Security State

Most Comments
Most Emailed

 * NEW! * The Making of a Global Security State
 * NEW! * Climate Change Puts Lake Life at Risk
The Terror Con



The Unwinding


Truthdig Bazaar
Backroom Politics

Backroom Politics

By Bill and Nancy Boyarsky
$101.88

more items

 
Reports

A Closer Look at Citizen Whitman

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Sep 9, 2010
Eric Draper / Meg Whitman for Governor 2010

Meg Whitman makes an August appearance at the Antelope Valley Fair in Lancaster, Calif.

By David Coleman

Meg Whitman, the former eBay empress, is the Republican candidate running for governor of California. We can only assume she wants that office so she can provide a public service for the citizens of California. Surely, then, it is reasonable to look back at her history of fulfilling public obligations as a California citizen. In doing so we can measure whether her current commitment to public service matches her record of participation in some public spheres of citizenship in the Golden State.

Shirking Jury Service

This week new insight into her attitudes toward public service emerged. Whitman was summoned as a potential juror for a child molestation prosecution in the Superior Court of San Mateo County, where she maintains a home in the tony Bay Area suburb of Atherton. The case was People v. Tarquin Craig Thomas. Thomas, a 44-year-old British citizen, is accused of molesting three boys.

When called into the jury box for voir dire examination as a prospective juror, Whitman virtually invited her own challenge:

… Republican Meg Whitman was dismissed as a potential juror in a San Mateo County child-molestation case. Earlier in the day, while being questioned, Whitman told attorneys she would serve if selected but acknowledged this is “not a good time for me to give 100 percent.”
—Bonnie Eslinger, “Meg Whitman dismissed as juror in child-molestation case,” Palo Alto Daily News, Sept. 3, 2010 (emphasis added)

Advertisement

Not surprisingly, Whitman’s declaration of her future attention deficit produced a quick “thank you and you are excused”—the result she sought. Any prosecutor, defense attorney or judge would quickly dismiss a prospective juror who asserted that she could not give her full attention and energy to serving on the jury. If a working-class prospective juror made such an assertion about an inability to focus on the case for personal reasons, it might not be deemed contemptuous, but it could surely draw a chastising admonition or “how dare you” lecture from some judges. 


In the big picture, the criminal jury trial in the Thomas case sought, on the one hand, to vindicate the interests of all the people of the state of California in protecting three young alleged victims of child molestation. On the other hand, a juror may also perform a public service of great importance for a defendant like Thomas, should he be wrongfully accused of a crime. 

By prompting her excusal from the public service of being a juror, Whitman ducked out of participation in the judicial process in which all the citizens of California have an interest. One can only wonder what the defendant or families of any of the victims in the courtroom thought about the importance of Whitman’s campaign schedule when compared with the importance to the community of the trial that was about to commence.

Whitman’s transparently engineered “pass” on jury service provides a compelling point of contrast with her opponent, former Gov. Jerry Brown. Whitman has spent tens of millions on political commercials hammering Brown with accusations about various “failures” in his lengthy political life and various elective offices.

But there was one small, historical public service in Brown’s heyday I doubt we will see referenced in Whitman’s television ads: the day in 1981 when, as the sitting governor of the largest state of the union, Jerry Brown reported to a courtroom for jury service. Unlike Whitman professing an incapacity to serve (due to her campaign to become governor), Brown who was governor sat on the jury and even served as the jury’s foreperson.

Certainly it can be debated whether high political officeholders should serve in courtrooms as jurors during their term in office. The public may view such service as a demonstration of the principle that no one is above the law. In professing our commitment to the rule of law for everyone in our justice system, there is an attendant obligation for everyone to serve (when selected) in its administration. And it is important that all citizens bear the same risk of having to interrupt their busy schedules of work and family when their name is called by the courtroom clerk. 

Back in 1981, some observers may have thought Brown’s service as a juror in a trial seemed like a bit of public grandstanding by the quirky and youthful governor who relished using a “common man” Plymouth state car and invited reporters to the sparsely furnished apartment he chose over living in the governor’s mansion. Maybe it was just cloth-coat showmanship by Jerry Brown. But in retrospect, a busy governor who journeyed to a county courthouse to sit and await his possible selection from the jury wheel—like any other citizen called to assist the justice system in which we all have a stake—seems like a symbolic gesture of political equality with the citizens who elected him that was well worth making. Meg Whitman apparently is not interested in making such a gesture.


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By tedmurphy41, September 15, 2010 at 2:20 am Link to this comment

Don’t tell me that you have no talented working class people able to stand for this elective position; or is the question really whether you can “afford” to stand as a candidate in this ‘democratic’ election??

Report this

By ocjim, September 12, 2010 at 12:30 pm Link to this comment

Re the 24/7 negative ads against Jerry Brown and Democrats over an interminable period of our lives, how would Meg Whitman rate as our governor?

For an easy assessment of Meg Whitman, we need only look at Meg Whitman’s past attitude about public service.

We might excuse her for not voting over a 28 year period, when she says she was too busy taking care of her husband and children. However, we must note her response last week when asked to serve on a child-molestation jury. This is “not a good time for me to give 100 percent,” she said.

It might not be a good time for her, but her saying it continues to show her obvious lack of commitment to public service. One might wonder if that would be her attitude about serving the people—at least when it suits her—should she win the election over Jerry Brown.

Report this

By Hammond Eggs, September 12, 2010 at 11:52 am Link to this comment

Meg Whitman, the former eBay empress, is the Republican candidate running for governor of California. We can only assume she wants that office so she can provide a public service for the citizens of California.

Mr. Coleman is being facetious, isn’t he?  Whitman wants the job for the same reason(s) any of these sociopaths want power.

Report this

By ardee, September 11, 2010 at 5:38 pm Link to this comment

Leefeller, September 9 at 9:53 pm Link to this comment

Ardee,

Seems to me our election system is already a mockery, one may suggest Whitman is only a tip of the iceberg.

Sadly true, yet it behooves us, I think, to point out the gross injustice of bought and paid for elections, and do so at every opportunity.

One reason I register and vote Green ( though I am not one at heart) is to support those pledged to refuse the bushels of corporate money that comes with such strings attached.

As to Hogs, I have only one summer worth of experience raising, feeding and “slopping ” those somewhat noble creatures. Smarter, by far, than dogs, but damnable hard to butcher.

Report this

By - bill, September 10, 2010 at 2:36 pm Link to this comment

If there are SIGNIFICANT reasons not to support Whitman for governor of California (and my guess would be that there are), why did you fail to list them and thus simply add to the lack of substance that is so emblematic of politics these days?

Report this

By srelf, September 10, 2010 at 12:35 pm Link to this comment

Jack:

Her answer was truthful, but it was also selfish. That’s the difference.

Report this

By SteveL, September 10, 2010 at 10:14 am Link to this comment

Citizen Whitman has spent over $100 million on a job that pays less than $170 per year.  She campaigns on fiscal responsibility and no one’s B.S. warning light goes off?

Report this

By Robin, September 10, 2010 at 8:56 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The point you make in the second-last paragraph is an excellent one. Thanks for a great article.

Report this

By felicity, September 10, 2010 at 8:04 am Link to this comment

Well, Republican Arnold has done such a great job as
governor that it makes perfect sense to elect another
Republican to fill the spot.

Here’s the question:  Why is a woman willing to spend
zillions of her own dollars securing a job that pays
what, about two-hundred grand/year?  Answer?

Report this
Money is funny's avatar

By Money is funny, September 9, 2010 at 10:16 pm Link to this comment

What happened here? The people who profited from real estate prostitution in CA were mostly from other states. Will the dumping ground for industry continue in my community? I would rather vote for the man who manages craigslist than this lady personally.

The reality of life for most people in this state is nothing like what you have seen in your tourist bait marketing propaganda magazines for a long time.

I am so completely disenfranchised at this point that this whole election looks like putting a different face on a steamy pile of dung.

Report this
G.Anderson's avatar

By G.Anderson, September 9, 2010 at 9:27 pm Link to this comment

Probably, the one thing that progressives hate most of all about Whitman, is that she’s probably going to win.

Because basically, the office of governor is for sale. Don’t kid yourself, it’s not about political point of view, or agenda, or who can do the most for Californian’s, but who has the most cold hard cash.

Because you see, the cold hard truth is both progressives, and conservatives are responsible for what happened to California. And because, both these political parties have ideologies and political belief systems that are antideluvian, they are incapable of doing anything to change things.

All they can do is watch, and shout at each other. Their words have as much importance as Dogs barking at each other from opposite street corners. 

If Whitman wins, the decline will probably be faster for the working poor, and those on welfare. If Brown wins, the middle class migration out of California will probably speed up.

But in the end, it will all come to the same thing.

Bankrupcy for Californa. The state simply cannot survive real estates return to 1970 levels. Ultimately there is nothing on God’s green earth that can stop it.

Except maybe, the whole sale selling off of California real estate to foreign investors at 5 cents on the dollar.

Report this

By Jack, September 9, 2010 at 8:44 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

There are many great reasons for objecting to Whitman as governor, but the fact that she gave a truthful answer to a question during jury selection is certainly not one of them. Let’s get real about politics.

Report this
Leefeller's avatar

By Leefeller, September 9, 2010 at 5:53 pm Link to this comment

Ardee,

Seems to me our election system is already a mockery, one may suggest Whitman is only a tip of the iceberg.

Moonbeam seems down to earth when comparing him to most moneybags politicians, those seeking or already in so called public office. Being a farmer I vision most politicians as hogs; (my apologies to hogs) running to the feed trough,..... pork-barrels are another thing!

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, September 9, 2010 at 5:50 pm Link to this comment

I’m no Republican and I can’t imagine ever voting for a Republican again, but an honest answer about jury being the FIRST point of attack?  Give me a break!  NOBODY wants to sit on a child molestation case!  I almost got on one but the defense’s attorney was getting rid of all the White men and the prosecutor was getting rid of all the Black men, in the last bastion of racism and sexism.  The prosecutor wanted an all-White (or at least non-Black) jury and the defense wanted an all-Black jury.  I watched them trying to cull—until I was let go.  This was despite the fact that the judge, defense and defendant were all Black and the prosecutor was Latina. Were they individually racist? I don’t know but functionally they were acting as racists.

Still, attacking Whitman for her honest answer about jury service seems really lame to me.

As for hitting an employee, that means she’s as nuts as Sarah Palin or Naomi Campbell.

And not voting?  How can you claim any sense of civic duty and not ego with that?

Meanwhile, I’d like to see Gerry Brown back in the Governor’s chair.  I think he’s just as dedicated but a better politician and manager now than he was in the past.

Report this

By glider, September 9, 2010 at 5:01 pm Link to this comment

All I know for sure was that Ebay was run into the ground.  In its prime it was “buyer centric”, place where the public could survey historical selling prices and bid with confidence in a fair auction environment.  “Management” changed that quickly and made Ebay “seller centric” by blocking access to their historical sell price data to appease their seller base for short term gains.  So the buying public has rightfully abandoned Ebay and it has become a shadow of its past self.  Rather, than an open auction environment it has turned into a 2nd class micro retailer environment with little growth going forward.  So why would anyone want to hire for Governor such a proven failure?

Report this

By squeaky jones, September 9, 2010 at 3:55 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Whitman is a part of the group of rich who just buy their way into office. Just like Dino Rossi in the state of Washington, they made their money off the misery of others, and only surface from under the cold dark rock that they live when there is a political office open. Their charade is clear, pretend to care while they make off with the peoples money, and destroying the common good.

Report this

By ardee, September 9, 2010 at 3:07 pm Link to this comment

I have a personal liking for “Governor Moonbeam” as Jerry Brown was known during his days in Sacramento. But there is a second reason for hoping Whitman fails to win office. The fact that she has spent almost one hundred million dollars of her own money to buy that office simply reeks of elitism and makes a mockery of our electoral system.

Normally I would vote Green or another third party as is my penchant but on this one I will cast my vote for Brown, though a full disclosure requires noting that he is spending about 35 million, not his own of course.

Report this

By The Donkey Edge, September 9, 2010 at 1:58 pm Link to this comment

How can Whitman ask Californians to vote for her when she didn’t bother to vote for 28 years?

Courage Campaign and the California Nurses Association want people to know more about her “atrocious” voting record so they asked us to create this video for them:

http://thedonkeyedge.com/2010/08/24/new-donkey-ad-meg-whitman-in-foiled-again/

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.