|
|
May 21, 2013
|
|
Elites’ Democratic Days Are NumberedPosted on Aug 15, 2010By David Sirota Call me an ’80s junkie, but when I saw the results of this week’s closely watched Colorado election, I immediately thought of “Spaceballs.” In that Mel Brooks masterpiece, a Darth Vader spoof named Dark Helmet says “evil will always triumph because good is dumb.” Make it “dumb and broke,” and you have a powerful explanation for incumbent Democratic Sen. Michael Bennet’s narrow primary victory over former state legislator Andrew Romanoff. In just the 20 months since being appointed to fill the vacated Senate seat of now-Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, Bennet became one of Congress’ top recipients of corporate cash. A wealthy businessman who had never held elected office before, he ultimately raised and spent almost $6 million on his campaign—more than any primary candidate in the history of Colorado. He was additionally aided by the Democratic National Committee and Organizing for America’s phone-banking, by President Barack Obama’s full-throated endorsement and by the built-in advantages that come with a taxpayer-financed Senate office. Romanoff, by contrast, swore off special-interest money from the beginning. As a former state House speaker with a deep grass-roots network throughout Colorado, he constructed a scrappy campaign on less than $2 million of mostly small-dollar, in-state contributions. In the relatively few ads he was able to afford, he juxtaposed his own progressive economic platform with Bennet’s odious Senate votes to protect the big banks, oil firms and health insurance companies that Americans despise and that financed Bennet’s campaign. Alas, it wasn’t enough. The Bennet campaign’s ads obscured the incumbent’s true record, and because those ads were backed with so much money, Romanoff’s spots were like a pin dropping at a Metallica concert, and the challenger lost. So it’s true—this particular political contest, like so many others, can indeed be summed up by paraphrasing Dark Helmet and noting that malevolent forces triumph because good is dumb and broke. The simple fact is, in elections across the country, many well-intentioned voters remain ill informed and many principled candidates are still too underfinanced to mount a winning campaign. Advertisement Considering Bennet’s wealth, corporate fundraising, incumbency and presidential support, it is astounding that a whopping 46 percent of this bellwether state’s Democratic voters cast their ballots against him, against their own party’s establishment and against their own party’s president. For those who care about a progressive economic agenda and about injecting democracy into the Democratic Party, this is encouraging when put next to the similarly impressive results of White House-thwarting Democratic primary challengers in Pennsylvania and Arkansas. And that trend explains the increasingly fierce pushback from Washington. Yes, this is why President Obama’s spokesman, Robert Gibbs, so vociferously berated the progressive movement on the eve of Colorado’s primary, and why DNC powerbrokers moved so forcefully against Romanoff. He was the latest candidate to represent what those elites know to be an ascendant national progressive uprising inside the Democratic Party—one that keenly understands money’s corrosive effects on public policy and that, therefore, rejects the Beltway’s corporatist model. Seeing that this uprising threatens their power and their D.C. worldview, these elites are desperate to preserve Dark Helmet’s principle—so desperate, in fact, they have resorted to employing Obama’s presidential campaign infrastructure to prop up more conservative candidates against progressive challengers in intraparty battles. This unholy alliance managed to hold off the onslaught this time. But make no mistake—Colorado is yet more evidence that the days of “Spaceballs” defining the Democratic Party are ending. David Sirota is the author of the best-selling books “Hostile Takeover” and “The Uprising.” He hosts the morning show on AM760 in Colorado and blogs at OpenLeft.com. E-mail him at ds@davidsirota.com or follow him on Twitter @davidsirota. © 2010 Creators.com Previous item: You Can’t Make Up Republican Candidates Like These Next item: N. Korea Deserves a Hard Kick for Abusing Its Soccer Team (Update) New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By Big Jess, August 16, 2010 at 1:56 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Unfortunately, by the time the end comes for the Dem elites, fascism, including troops and private contractors, will be in full effect to quell any dissident uprising. Voting will continue, but largely as a charade.
The last possibility of reform arrived with Obama the candidate and disappeared the day he was sworn in.
Put a fork in american democracy. We;re done.
Report thisBy - bill, August 15, 2010 at 8:37 pm Link to this comment
While I’m not holding my breath for the demise of the Democratic establishment (but rather encouraging people to vote Republican at least for national offices in November to help hasten that event), it’s worth noting that Sirota only appears to be encouraging people to ‘vote Democratic’ in primaries against Democratic incumbents (something entirely consistent with my own approach).
I suppose that energizing the base in primaries might have SOME residual effect in the general election that follows, but whether that effect would be positive or negative for incumbent Democrats is not clear (people whose progressive favorites were beaten by the eventual lack-luster nominee might be less likely to pull the lever reflexively for said nominee than they would have been had they not become involved earlier).
Now, if Sirota trotted out the tired mantra that even a sell-out Democrat is preferable to a Republican, THEN I’d be happy to castigate him. Meanwhile, I’ll reserve judgment and be grateful that his heart seems to be in the the right place.
Report thisBy ofersince72, August 15, 2010 at 8:19 pm Link to this comment
Elites’ Democratic Days Are Numbered.
Wanna bet???? How much???? I will give you odds!!
How many times in forty years have we heard this one???
Nice talk, democrat supporting journalist, give the
poor, poor, babies a good reason to vote Democrat.
Report thisThat is your journalist job. You are doing well.
“Well we almost won one, see!, we will getter done next time!”
By kerryrose, August 15, 2010 at 6:56 pm Link to this comment
There comes a time when we have to recognize Obama for what he is… an insider, status quo corporate Democratic that differs only slightly from a corporate Republican.
The amazing thing is that Clinton, the quintessential corporate Democrat, supported Romanoff. I think Clinton is having old man regrets. He admitted as much, weepily about his abuses in Haiti.
Report this