LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
November 24, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Hamas Stills the Rockets

Obama's Third Way in Afghanistan

Refuse Allegiance to Coal

Over 30 Civilians Killed in Philippines Massacre

To Your Health -- and Mine

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Books, Not Bombs
 * NEW! * To Your Health—and Mine

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Freedom’s Fight: Part II

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
Changing Venezuela

Changing Venezuela

By Gregory Wilpert
$17.79

more items

 
Reports

We Need a Civilian ‘ROTC’

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Nov 16, 2009

By E.J. Dionne

Imagine a time when government work was exciting, widely admired and much sought after.

It seems an outlandish thought at a moment when you cannot turn on your television without hearing government spoken of as almost an alien creature. It is cast as far removed from the lives of average Americans and more likely to destroy the achievements of private citizens than to accomplish anything worthwhile.

True, we don’t apply our anti-government sentiments to at least one group of Americans who draw government paychecks: our men and women in uniform. All the polls show they are, deservedly, held in high esteem. But civilians who do the daily work of government are more likely to be referred to as “bureaucrats,” “time servers” and various unprintable things than as public servants.

This has not always been the American way. There were important eras in our history when citizens in large numbers were drawn to government service with a sense of mission and exhilaration. The New Deal was certainly such a time, and so were the days of the New Frontier and (it is unjustly derided now) the Great Society.

They came in part—take note, President Obama—because they were inspired by leaders who made it a point to call them into government. Caroline Kennedy has said that when she was growing up, “hardly a day went by when someone didn’t come up to us and say: ‘Your father changed my life. I went into public service because he asked me.’ ”

Advertisement

But inspiration is not enough. The military, after all, does not rely solely on patriotic feelings to build its force, and neither should the civilian parts of government. One of the most powerful incentives the military has is the Reserve Officers’ Training Corps, which offers assistance to those seeking higher education. It’s time for a civilian ROTC.

That’s the idea of a bipartisan group of Senate and House members who are proposing to create the Roosevelt Scholars program, named after Teddy Roosevelt. Reps. David Price, D-N.C., and Mike Castle, R-Del., have introduced a bill in the House, and a similar measure is expected in the Senate this week from Sens. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., and George Voinovich, R-Ohio.

Although there is sentiment to include undergraduates in the program, the House bill is aimed at graduate students, because the federal government has a special demand for highly qualified employees who are otherwise attracted (and heavily recruited) by the private sector. In exchange for generous scholarships in fields such as engineering, information technology, foreign languages and public health, the scholars would commit to three to five years of service in an agency of the federal government.

“With the aging of the boomers and those who responded to [John] Kennedy’s call to service, we need to replenish the government work force,” says Max Stier, president and CEO of the Partnership for Public Service.

Stier, a one-man evangelizing squad on behalf of government service, notes that the government must fill 273,000 “mission-critical” positions in the next three years. This will require vast improvements in the way that government recruits and a new willingness to invest in its work force.

The military, he says, gets roughly 40 percent of its officer corps through ROTC. It makes sense to undertake a comparable investment in the civil service.

In the small and underappreciated world of those who care passionately about improving government’s performance and prestige, there are competing visions of how to achieve this. One group of activists and legislators has been pushing to create a Public Service Academy, modeled after the military academies, to prepare a new generation of leaders in government.

It’s a good idea and would send another powerful signal that government work is and should be valued. But with the extraordinary constraints on the federal budget, the prospects of the large investment that would be required to build a new institution are not exactly rosy. A civilian ROTC would be a good first step. The Roosevelt program has the benefit of drawing on the entire higher education system’s capacity to produce specialists.

The Roosevelt program could also be an antidote to two debilitating trends in our politics. It would push back against the tendency of politicians to deride government (an odd habit, since politicians are themselves engaged in government service). And it might open the way for a bipartisan achievement at a time when such endeavors are in very short supply. 

E.J. Dionne’s e-mail address is ejdionne(at)washpost.com.
   
© 2009, Washington Post Writers Group


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By "G"utless "W"itless Hitler, November 18 at 3:41 pm #

How the heck do you rack up 120K in student loans working on a Masters and PhD in Public Administration and Public Policy?  Presumably, you get the Masters on the way to the PhD so the total effort should take three or four years. I hope you’re not paying tuition!

Report this

By djnoll, November 18 at 3:27 pm #

Here is a compromise:  Instead of an ROTC like program, why not give forgiveness on the tens of thousands of dollars in student loans that these people wrack up to get the skills needed for the work they would be doing for the government in exchange for a contract that guarantees one year of service for every year of student loans?  I would sign up in a heartbeat to serve my country at 57 years old with some $120,000 in student loans from my Masters and PhD work (ongoing) in Public Administration and Public Policy.  I have seen such programs for teachers and doctors, so why not for government service?  It would viable, it is already a program in existence, and the American public gets payback in service for the money that paid for the education of people such as myself.  It is simple, but apparently, Mr. Dionne does not see simple, only complicated and objectionable.

Do we need more people in government service?  Yes, at the local and state levels especially, but we also need people to help better govern this nation and implement policies that are practical and workable in a nation this size.  Government service does not pay as well as it used to in relation to the private sector, but if done well, it is worthwhile and something to be proud of.  It allows people to make a difference within the system instead of trying to constantly tear it down, and if the citizens of this nation maintained an active role in their own governance, perhaps less government service would be required.  But until they do, encouraging people to enter public service is important, and loan forgiveness for college students is a good way to start.

Report this

By "G"utless "W"itless Hitler, November 17 at 10:34 am #

By Anarcissie, November 17 at 12:34 am #


“The first thing that would occur to a neo-con as training for public service would be, of course, ROTC.”

Of course, the neocons themselves would all get deferments.

Report this

By Thomthum, November 17 at 2:39 am #

I’m highly qualified. Why not make the process of applying for, getting and filling these govt positions easier?

I’ll sign up for 5 years..10? 15!!

Report this

By Anarcissie, November 17 at 12:34 am #

The first thing that would occur to a neo-con as training for public service would be, of course, ROTC.

Report this

By LostHills, November 16 at 10:04 pm #

There’s no such thing as “Public Service.” Everyone who works for the government or runs for office does it for the money and the perks. They’re just a bunch of hogs at the trough, and so are the journalists that belly up to the trough along with them. Telling that they named this bill after a war criminal but, as Arlo Guthrie says, “That’s America for ya…..”

Report this

By gerard, November 16 at 8:09 pm #

Too bad Dionne hooks the idea into ROTC because apparently he is promoting higher education for government service only, not military enlistment. But by linking ROTC he confuses the issue.  (Or is this intentional?)  Those many people who are opposed to the influence of military in the schools in any form need to regard this suggestion with extreme suspicion. 
  The military aspect might get Congressional votes, and might bring in money to the project more easily, but if the education is in any way connected to the military, it will end up just another way of bribing kids to sign up for war in order to go to school—a policy which is downright evil and mean - if you stop to think about it—taking advantage of naive kids who think they are signing up for education, then later finding out that military strings were attached in the fine print.

Report this

By "G"utless "W"itless Hitler, November 16 at 5:40 pm #

I know a girl who went from the private sector to a state job.  Foolishly, she was in the habit of staying late or bringing work home with her so she could clear some of the backlog that the last slack-ass to hold the job dropped in her lap.  When her boss found out about this unorthodox behavior, she was told to knock it off.  When she pushed back, they guy actually threatened to fire her saying in effect that she might not be DOT material.  True story!

Report this

By SteveM, November 16 at 5:24 pm #

From a practical standpoint, why should the government pay students’ tuition when students right now are actually paying for internships?!  Hundreds of thousands of white collar workers are pounding the pavements.  And Dionne thinks taxpayer subsidies are required to get people into government?

ROTC is a bribe because bribes are needed to get people into the Army.  People are beating down doors to get into the government!

In this economy, who wouldn’t want a low stress, 9 to 5 job, with great benefits and no possibility of being fired?  Paying people to take government jobs?  Puh…leeze.

Report this

By grumpynyker, November 16 at 3:19 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Bring back the draft.  I’m tired of aging 60s Vietnam
War dodgers exempting their loved ones from military
service or contact with recruiters.  Maybe if the
little bastards faced multiple deployments, possible
body/brain damage/repercussions from toxic
immunizations/depleted uranium exposure instead of
sitting on their fat asses playing Wii, Playstation 3,
or typing in front of computer keyboards the colossal
waste of money fighting bullshit wars would end ASAP.

Report this

By albert, November 16 at 1:56 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Excuse me? I’ve known quite a few federal employees, and they all have been, without exception, too in love with their jobs to give a rats behind about the destruction that the treasonous parties have and are doing to this country.

Report this

By Anarcissie, November 16 at 1:43 pm #

Filler Crowly—why are you shocked?  The Washington Post is a neo-con outlet.  Neo-cons believe in government as a sort of religion.  When the misdeeds of government become too overwhelming, as they tend to pretty regularly, it’s time for some window-dressing and some new recruiting techniques.  Thus we have Camelot and the Peace Corps at the same time as the War in Vietnam is being ginned up.  With the U.S. involved in several profitless imperial wars and a depression, you’re going to hear a lot of idealism.

Report this

By Filler Crowley, November 16 at 12:44 pm #

What’s this? A halfway decent idea from an employee of the Washington Post? Color me shocked!

Report this

By sollipsist, November 16 at 11:38 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Dionne’s pieces just keep getting funnier (Onion veteran?).

Soon to come: “Anti-Government Speech Qualifies as Hate Crime”.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.