Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
Top Banner, Site wide
Apr 18, 2014

 Choose a size
Text Size

Top Leaderboard, Site wide

Star-Spangled Baggage
Science Finds New Routes to Energy




The Divide


Truthdig Bazaar
The Great American Stickup

The Great American Stickup

By Robert Scheer
$10.00

more items

 
Report

Getting Out of Afghanistan With Grace

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Nov 12, 2009
U.S. Army / Sgt. Matthew Moeller

U.S. Army Pvt. John Stafinski fires his M-249 squad automatic weapon during a three-hour gun battle with insurgent fighters in the Waterpur Valley, in Kunar province, Afghanistan.

By William Pfaff

There are two tried and disproved methods for dealing with insurrection in a non-Western country. The third and reliable method is not to go there in the first place. The fourth is get out with such grace as is possible, as rapidly as possible. President Barack Obama may be looking at the last option, hitherto not on the policy menu.

The first method is treat the insurrection as a conventional military challenge. Attack en masse to destroy the uprising and its infrastructure, employ shock-and-awe tactics, search for and destroy the rebels’ sources of supply, even when this means invading neighboring countries. Make the enemy stand up and fight the way Americans fight wars. Rely on mass, overwhelming logistical superiority, and the huge American technological advantage.

This was Gen. William Westmoreland’s strategy at the start of the Vietnam War. Outkill the enemy. Make body counts the measure of success. By 1969, this program had failed and Westmoreland had been relieved.

In Iraq, in 2003, the United States again went in with fast, high-powered and overwhelming armed force, blasting to shreds whatever was in its way. It was a great success in getting to Baghdad. But the enemy had not been interested in fighting. Several of the most important Iraqi generals had secretly been bought off. The ordinary soldier had no enthusiasm in fighting for Saddam Hussein, nor had the midlevel officers.

The Iraq army expected to be taken over by the conquerors and put to work cleaning up and re-establishing order in the country. Instead the soldiers were told to go home: that they were untrustworthy Baathists—nationalists, socialists and pan-Arabists—members of Saddam Hussein’s old party. So they went home and found other things to do, such as taking part in an insurrection to drive the occupiers out, not without success.

Advertisement

Square, Site wide
The Americans have started to leave Iraq, having gained nothing except to make Iran the regional great power, and to create hostility for American oil companies that wanted but are not getting oilfield development contracts.

Iraq is still a very unsettled country, with a difficult national election scheduled at the beginning of the new year. American troops are supposed to leave the country in two years, but doubt about that remains. Mideastern, Turkish, European, Russian and Far Eastern companies are highly actively looking for business there. (The U.S. State Department advises American businessmen against traveling to Iraq; it’s too dangerous.)

A second classic strategic theory for defeating insurrections is “clear and hold.” This is very much in fashion in Washington now thanks to its advocacy by Gen. David H. Petraeus at Central Command and Stanley A. McChrystal in Afghanistan, and also in two recent books, one by Lewis Sorley, the other by David Kilcullen, both arguing that the Vietnam War was actually won by such a strategy—but too late for the fickle American press, public opinion and Congress to recognize the victory.

Clear and hold means ejecting guerrillas from an area and then protecting it from their return. This began in postwar Malaya (as it was then) in 1948, when an insurrection from inside the Chinese minority population caused much of that population to be confined in guarded villages, leaving British troops free to deal with the Chinese who escaped this treatment. Eventually a political solution was found.

In Vietnam, where the U.S. copied the method, these villages were called Strategic Hamlets and were employed in conjunction with the Phoenix program to “clear” areas of enemy or unreliable elements, and defend against the return of the Viet Cong. The Sorley and Kilcullen books notwithstanding, the Communists won that war, the American part of it having lasted from 1963 to 1973.

In the Afghanistan case, Gen. McChrystal has suggested that his war, if fought on his terms (with troop reinforcements rising to a total of over 100,000 men at least), would take between 10 and 50 years to succeed.

Afghanistan consists of 652,230 square kilometers (251,827 square miles), many of them more or less vertically inclined, populated by an estimated 28.4 million people. Iraq has an estimated population of 28.9 million people and 438,317 square kilometers (169,235 square miles), many of them flat. The estimates of how many civilians died in Iraq range around the figure of 100,000, with some—such as   the Johns Hopkins-Lancet study—much higher.

President Obama, who’s been part of videoconferences on Afghan policy prior to his Asia trip this week, ought to have interest in talking again with the U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan, Karl W. Eikenberry. A former U.S. military commander there (2005-2007), now retired from the Army, Eikenberry has expressed on paper his reservations about sending any more U.S. combat troops at all to the country. He would cut back to a few thousand more trainers, and wait to see if the Afghans improved in their ability to look after their own country. If not ... ?

Visit William Pfaff’s Web site at www.williampfaff.com.

© 2009 Tribune Media Services, Inc.


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

Leefeller's avatar

By Leefeller, November 12, 2009 at 6:57 pm Link to this comment

“Obama is going to escalate the war while exuding Inspring rhetoric that he is going to end it.  Inspiring deceit is his forte, consistent with the rollicking irrationality of the American truth consensus”. 

FT, What is the American truth consensus?

Unlike some other posters I do not know nor predict what Obama will do, but I feel, it is my opinion he should pull the troops out asap, and the hell with Grace! Out! Out! Out!

Report this

By Folktruther, November 12, 2009 at 6:42 pm Link to this comment

“Grace?”  What grace?  Pfaff is really reaching here to put a good face on a strategy Obaama is not going to follow.  Every knowledgeable truther already knows that Afpak war is lost for the US and Nato.  It boils down to saving one’s political ass by military means. 

Obama is going to escalate the war while exuding Inspring rhetoric that he is going to end it.  Inspiring deceit is his forte, consistent with the rollicking irrationality of the American truth consensus.

Report this

By Gmonst, November 12, 2009 at 6:36 pm Link to this comment

A strategy which would take 10-50 years as a best case scenario is not really much of a strategy.  I have lost all sense of a clue of what the hell we hope to accomplish over there.  The stated goals of making it so it can’t ever again be a terrorist haven seem unrealistic to say the least, and can be translated to mean making it a place of permanent occupation.  Immediately after 9/11 it at least made sense, break up the Al-Qada training camps and catch Osama Bin Laden.  Bin Laden is long gone, perhaps not even alive, and we are no longer fighting with anyone connected to the terrorist attack of 9/11/01.  As time goes on the goals become murkier and murkier, whilst the conflict becomes deadlier and deadlier.  Its well on time to pull out and try to help the Afghani people rebuild from a distance.  We can’t hope to solve all the problems there in the next 100 years, let alone 10.  We have been there nearly a decade and its only getting worse.  Its a endless pit of money and death. If we don’t read the writting on the wall and commit more resources, it will eventually break us like it broke the old USSR.

Report this

Page 2 of 2 pages  <  1 2

Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
 
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion   Publisher, Zuade Kaufman   Editor, Robert Scheer
© 2014 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.

Like Truthdig on Facebook