Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
June 18, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     nsa     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

The Terror Con

The FBI May Have Finally Found Jimmy Hoffa

Say Hello to the 'Super Rich'

The Making of a Global Security State

This Will Not End Well

Most Comments
Most Emailed

 * NEW! * The Making of a Global Security State
 * NEW! * Climate Change Puts Lake Life at Risk
 * NEW! * The Terror Con



The Unwinding


Truthdig Bazaar
The Divine Comedy

The Divine Comedy

By Dante Alighieri
$21.57

more items

 
Reports

Kucinich: Why I Voted No

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Nov 8, 2009
Flickr / SEIU International

By Rep. Dennis Kucinich

We have been led to believe that we must make our health care choices only within the current structure of a predatory, for-profit insurance system which makes money not providing health care. We cannot fault the insurance companies for being what they are. But we can fault legislation in which the government incentivizes the perpetuation, indeed the strengthening, of the for-profit health insurance industry, the very source of the problem. When health insurance companies deny care or raise premiums, co-pays and deductibles they are simply trying to make a profit. That is our system.

Clearly, the insurance companies are the problem, not the solution. They are driving up the cost of health care. Because their massive bureaucracy avoids paying bills so effectively, they force hospitals and doctors to hire their own bureaucracy to fight the insurance companies to avoid getting stuck with an unfair share of the bills. The result is that since 1970, the number of physicians has increased by less than 200% while the number of administrators has increased by 3000%. It is no wonder that 31 cents of every health care dollar goes to administrative costs, not toward providing care. Even those with insurance are at risk. The single biggest cause of bankruptcies in the U.S. is health insurance policies that do not cover you when you get sick.

But instead of working toward the elimination of for-profit insurance, H.R. 3962 would put the government in the role of accelerating the privatization of health care. In H.R. 3962, the government is requiring at least 21 million Americans to buy private health insurance from the very industry that causes costs to be so high, which will result in at least $70 billion in new annual revenue, much of which is coming from taxpayers. This inevitably will lead to even more costs, more subsidies, and higher profits for insurance companies—a bailout under a blue cross.

By incurring only a new requirement to cover pre-existing conditions, a weakened public option, and a few other important but limited concessions, the health insurance companies are getting quite a deal. The Center for American Progress’ blog, Think Progress, states, “since the President signaled that he is backing away from the public option, health insurance stocks have been on the rise.” Similarly, healthcare stocks rallied when Senator Max Baucus introduced a bill without a public option. Bloomberg reports that Curtis Lane, a prominent health industry investor, predicted a few weeks ago that “money will start flowing in again” to health insurance stocks after passage of the legislation. Investors.com last month reported that pharmacy benefit managers share prices are hitting all-time highs, with the only industry worry that the Administration would reverse its decision not to negotiate Medicare Part D drug prices, leaving in place a Bush Administration policy.

During the debate, when the interests of insurance companies would have been effectively challenged, that challenge was turned back. The “robust public option” which would have offered a modicum of competition to a monopolistic industry was whittled down from an initial potential enrollment of 129 million Americans to 6 million. An amendment which would have protected the rights of states to pursue single-payer health care was stripped from the bill at the request of the Administration. Looking ahead, we cringe at the prospect of even greater favors for insurance companies.

Advertisement

Recent rises in unemployment indicate a widening separation between the finance economy and the real economy. The finance economy considers the health of Wall Street, rising corporate profits, and banks’ hoarding of cash, much of it from taxpayers, as sign of an economic recovery. However in the real economy—in which most Americans live—the recession is not over. Rising unemployment, business failures, bankruptcies and foreclosures are still hammering Main Street.

This health care bill continues the redistribution of wealth to Wall Street at the expense of America’s manufacturing and service economies which suffer from costs other countries do not have to bear, especially the cost of health care. America continues to stand out among all industrialized nations for its privatized health care system. As a result, we are less competitive in steel, automotive, aerospace and shipping while other countries subsidize their exports in these areas through socializing the cost of health care.

Notwithstanding the fate of H.R. 3962, America will someday come to recognize the broad social and economic benefits of a not-for-profit, single-payer health care system, which is good for the American people and good for America’s businesses, with of course the notable exceptions being insurance and pharmaceuticals.


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By RobertinWestbury, November 9, 2009 at 4:59 pm Link to this comment

First of all the charge that Kucinich is playing politics is nonsense.  Anyone who knows the man’s character knows that is a baseless statement. 

He has fought for single payer for years.

We would be a blessed nation indeed if he were ever to find himself to be our president. 

It’s tiresome reading people who like what he says nevertheless jump on the bandwagon of scorn because he doesn’t self identify as a ‘green’ or ‘socialist’ or independent. 

I do not see anything wrong with a Democrat remaining a democrat and standing up for what is right.  He could never be a serious contender for president with any of those labels, and even if enough Americans voted for a ‘socialist’ (doesn anyone really think that is possible?), he would be ineffective as neither party in Congress would work with him. 

I say it’s just fine to have a true progressive within the party. 

And he is about the most honorable man in politics today.  It’s disheartening to see some of you attack him.  But then, it seems that going negative is the dominate trait some of you always seem to have..

Report this
DieDaily's avatar

By DieDaily, November 9, 2009 at 4:42 pm Link to this comment

I think the salient point here is that the bill is
not progressive, is corporation-friendly, and is
going to further bankrupt an already failing system
while it further lines the bulging pockets of the
oligarchs. Kucinich is so classic. He attempted to
impeach Bush. He grilled wall street over their
bailout debacles like no other. Yet he is so clearly
trans-partisan. He is not fooled by the soothing
teleprompted left-cover of the corporatist deep-agent
Obama. Instead he ruthlessly burns that cover down. I
really love this website and am so grateful that the
comments of those from the illusionary right and the
illusionary left are allowed to remain unmolested.
But most gratifying of all is that I observe a
burgeoning, almost viral awakening of the public to
the fact that the left vs. right false-duality is a
long-exploited illusion. Our only hope as a nation
lies in realizing that there is not a snowball’s
chance in hell that either party can or will
represent us meaningfully. People like Kucinich and
Paul, love them or hate them, vote their consciences
and, most crucially, that of their constituents
irrespective of which ring of the two-party circus
this APPEARS to land them in. They are like a couple
of gentle lions braving the screeches and fecal
volleys of two cages of venal and demented monkeys.

Report this

By Fewkes, November 9, 2009 at 4:33 pm Link to this comment

Regardless of the rhetoric about the current health care reform legislation passed
in the House of Representatives or the anticipated battle in the Senate, the only
real solution to the runaway health care costs and the failure to deliver health care
to all Americans is Medicare for all legislation offered in HR 676.  The ONLY thing
that will really work is a single payer system that takes the profit motive out of
health care.  Decisions about health care must be based on medical analysis by
doctors.

Congress, under the influence of enormous health insurance industry campaign
contributions, does not represent “we the people”.  They defend the health
insurance industry like it’s their natural constituency.

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, November 9, 2009 at 4:14 pm Link to this comment

I admire Kucinich who has advocated single payer for a very long time as a solution to Americas issue of healthcare for its citizens, anything less is a retreat from what U.S. citizens deserve from their government in return for their tax dollars.

While this country spends trillions maintaining fixed and floating military bases both at home and abroad, it allows the free enterprise system to kill our less fortunate citizens here at home.

There will always be a place for the insurance companies to make money (private room, private doctor, TV, wifi) in healthcare but the making of life and death decisions is better left in the doctors conference room, not an administrators board room.

While I admire Kucinichs’ stand I can only think this legislation is a step in the right direction, flawed as it is.  Soon, the shortcommings will be evident and the next congress can make the necessary corrections, we will evolve our health system away from profit but reward innovation in treating our citizens better for less.

Report this

By ardee, November 9, 2009 at 3:26 pm Link to this comment

If the bill is so bad and does nothing to disadvantage the health insurance companies why didn’t the Republicans embrace it with enthusiasm? The truth is Obama actually wants to get something done and the Republicans are just playing politics

This statement by Diamond illustrates only that starting with a conclusion and then manufacturing to make that conclusion seemingly accurate seems a failure.

The Republicans understand, even if you do not, that Obama’s health care legislation is the lynch pin of his first term in office. If they defeat that they can presumably defeat him in 2012.

As to Obama’s motivations to get things done; he seems rather poor at doing such. Rather than being the motivator he left the field to the Congress, instead of insisting upon single payer he gave it up without a struggle.

Instead of taking his case to the people of this nation who seem to want ,and definitely need, real health care reform he accepted the poison pill from big Pharma, let Congress gut anything meaningful from the bill, allowed reactionaries in his own party to further hamstring abortion access and we have a House bill that would fail to resolve our most pressing needs. Once this lack of leadership allows the Senate to further castrate this pending legislation we the people will have lost.

Report this
Fat Freddy's avatar

By Fat Freddy, November 9, 2009 at 3:23 pm Link to this comment

Jim Yell,

Ron Paul and other Austrians (school of economics) do not stand for chaos. They stand for economic freedom and liberty. As long as the government controls the money supply, we will all just be servants of the government and the institutions that they choose to support, such as: Goldman Sacks, Exxon/Mobile, GE, GM, ADM, JP Morgan Chase etc, etc, etc.

Report this

By diamond, November 9, 2009 at 2:49 pm Link to this comment

Night-Gaunt you need to learn a very valuable lesson which the Republicans take in with their mother’s milk: those who don’t hang together will hang separately. The Republicans always hang together which is why Cheney and Bush and Rumsfeld haven’t been thrown in jail - yet. You obviously don’t understand the art of the political wedge; a tactic in which the opposition uses an issue to divide the government hoping they’ll be seen as weak and in disarray. Kucinich is clueless enough to play into this tactic, thereby weakening his own party and his own leader. Therefore Kucinich is, politically speaking, a dickhead. His no vote does nothing to alter the reality Obama has to deal with and plays into the hands of the Republicans. Not wise and not useful. You may have noticed that only one Republican voted for this bill. I can’t remember who said it but it’s so true: the evil always support each other, it’s their great strength. If the bill is so bad and does nothing to disadvantage the health insurance companies why didn’t the Republicans embrace it with enthusiasm? The truth is Obama actually wants to get something done and the Republicans are just playing politics. So is Kucinich and shame on him for doing so.

Report this

By paul bass, November 9, 2009 at 2:37 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

“Who are you and why should your opinion be meaningful to me?”

im nobody go, back to sleep

Report this
Night-Gaunt's avatar

By Night-Gaunt, November 9, 2009 at 12:57 pm Link to this comment

So says the man that should have been president of the USA. Except that the PTB would never have someone allowed to run and get the nomination and get “elected” in this country at this time. Never.

Diamond, can you read? Comprehend? The bill is a shill and a give away to the health insurance companies and won’t really help much of anyone. So it is bad and needs to be killed. The only “dick head” here is you.

How can you be effectual if you are an island surrounded by others inimical to you and your values? Should he then just give up and let the juggernaut move that much faster? What is your point here InheritTheWind? Blaming him for being nearly alone defending us? Such an ingrate you are.

I agree with you hold heartily on Ron Paul and his son Rand Paul—look out for him.

“Once again, Kucinich wins some kudos, but not my vote. Push comes to shove, he is still a Democrat, not an Independent, Green, or Socialist. “-Xntrk

If Mazie voted “yes” and Kucinich “no” how does that add up for you? He is more of a Liberal and Progressive than Obama ever was, if ever.

Also stop being so sexist as if male genitalia is the only way to be courageous and a spine works much better to represent both men and women in this, okay?

I must admit InheritTheWind you do have some gall attacking one of the few real Democrats fighting for us. The only thing he might occasionally obstruct is the fascists move to defund us while funding themselves to the tune of billions every year. Ron Paul would accelerate it and Dennis Kucinich would do what he could to obliterate it. Yes damn the few who fight and claim they are the enemy. Quite a usable tactic on the ignorant. Just won’t wash here. Better find Little Green Footballs which is more your style of forum.

Report this

By FRTothus, November 9, 2009 at 11:47 am Link to this comment

The hypocrisy of Congress no longer surprises me.  The very same people that already have socialized medicine deny it to the rest of us.  I was very impressed with Kucinich’s pledge during his Presidential campaign that if elected, he would demand that Congress enact legislation that would provide to every American the same publically-funded health care Congress now enjoys within 6 months of his election, or the Congress would lose theirs.  I am equally impressed with his stand against this monument to corporate welfare.  American citizens, in poll after poll, and by very wide margins, want universal, single-payer, publically-funded health care, and know that there is plenty of money already in the budget for this and so much more.  But the trillions spent on war and killing, the billions spent protecting the largest corporations from the “free market”, enriches the very few, and has the desirable side-effect of keeping policy decisions in the hands of the corporate oligarchy and removed from the people who actually are paying the bills.  God forbid that the people should get any benefit from their own money.  No, after the corporate Congress and our corporate President get done with this bait-and-switch (from universal, single-payer to “affordable”), we will be required to go through insurance companies who never saw a policy they weren’t eager to deny in the name of profit, and we will be forced to buy what we already pay far too much for.  Again, costs are to be socialized, while profits are privatized. Whether the government takes over the corporations, or the corporations take over the government, the effect is the same.  Maybe if they spoke German, marched in goose-step, and wore swastikas we would recognize them for what they are. But just because they speak English, claim to be Christian, and wave the American flag doesn’t mean they aren’t fascists. 

As William O. Douglas, former U.S. Supreme Court Justice put it, “Those in power are blind devotees to private enterprise. They accept that degree of socialism implicit in the vast subsidies to the military-industrial-complex, but not that type of socialism which maintains public projects for the disemployed and the unemployed alike.” “Our upside down welfare state is ‘socialism for the rich, free enterprise for the poor.’ The great welfare scandal of the age concerns the dole we give rich people.”

Report this
Outraged's avatar

By Outraged, November 9, 2009 at 11:16 am Link to this comment

Article quote: “America continues to stand out among all industrialized nations for its privatized health care system. As a result, we are less competitive in steel, automotive, aerospace and shipping while other countries subsidize their exports in these areas through socializing the cost of health care.”

Rep. Kucinich is absolutely correct.  The majority of Americans AGREE and understand that single payer would be THE BEST choice.  We also understand the current level of corruption in congress, I’m sure that if single-payer could have garnered enough votes that it would have been the bill that was brought forth.  We did have a sizeable number of Democrats in the House co-sign HR676, but not enough.

My conjecture is this…... if the Dems would have been short on votes to pass H.R. 3962, Kucinich would have voted the other way.  Kucinich is a person of integrity, this he has shown but he is also a person of compassion and empathy so it seems unrealistic, at least to me, that he would have furthered the current despicable heathcare situation for ideological reasons.

Re: Fat Freddy

Your comment:  “My question is, why did he wait until after the vote to go public with his concerns?”

Hopefully my last paragraph above will give you food for thought, that’d be my take.

Re: Purplegirl

Your comment: “There is no shame in being a pragmantic progressive.  In fact the definition of the Term “Progressive"otherwise might as well call yourselves the ‘Magicians’.”

Absolutely, I agree.  Good point.

Report this
LostHills's avatar

By LostHills, November 9, 2009 at 10:42 am Link to this comment

Thank you, Dennis.
A voice of sanity on a sinking ship…..

Report this

By Tom Semioli, November 9, 2009 at 10:08 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Rant from the left, rant from the right, rant from the center. Regardless, as long as the burden of health care remains on U.S. employers - there is no chance of an economic recovery. That is an indesputable fact. Certainly we have to amend the so called free trade agreements, put laws back on Wall Street etc. but it all starts will national health care.

Report this

By Folktruther, November 9, 2009 at 9:41 am Link to this comment

Good point, Freddy.

Report this

By eggroll, November 9, 2009 at 9:30 am Link to this comment

In Cormac McCarthy’s The Road, the protagonists meet up
with an old, seemingly disoriented, man. Then the guy
let’s fly with the best observation in the book:

“People were always getting ready for tomorrow. I didnt
believe in that. Tomorrow wasnt getting ready for them.
It didnt even know they were there.”

Looks like a lot of our Congress members are concerned
about getting ready for tomorrow.

Report this

By NYCartist, November 9, 2009 at 9:23 am Link to this comment

Dennis Kucinich is the BEST we have in Congress (along with a few others, Kaptur, Waters, B.Lee…)

He was on DemocracyNow this morning http://www.democracynow.org  with Jane Hamsher of http://www.firedoglake.com  Jane Hamsher asked some good questions at the end of the discussion, of Kucinich about “what happened to the other cosigners of HR676”?
She spoke about the horrendous amendment to prevent choice of abortion in health plans that the gov’t pays into in some way (she puts it better and Kucinich was a bit “off” on what the bill does in re that).  Hamsher recently wrote on her blog FDL about restrictions to women with breast cancer in re lack of drug coverage in the plan.

  I am calling the legislations, so far, as a Potemkin Village: fake facade.  Kucinich does a great job on topic from “inside” the mess.

  http://www.blackagendareport.com has been doing good analysis ongoing: Bruce A. Dixon and Glen Ford.  New material goes up on Wednesdays.

Report this
Purple Girl's avatar

By Purple Girl, November 9, 2009 at 8:20 am Link to this comment

There is no shame in being a pragmantic progressive.
In fact the definition of the Term “Progressive"otherwise might as well call yourselves the ‘Magicians’.
Love ya Dennis but your ‘No” counts exactly like the party of “So"s votes. It will be irrlevent to the 45,000 American who will die needlessly next year what your reasons were. and will probably not give a rats ass about your sense of moral conviction. They will be denied care or lose care, regardless.
Universal healthcare coverage is a dead soldier, as is Doing Nothing. It’s a step forward, one that is worth taking to begin the Process towards healthcare for All.
“No” is “No” and gets US nowhere.

Report this

By Jim Yell, November 9, 2009 at 8:02 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I have reviewed some of the comments and find many are barking mad. Ron Paul is the answer? It must be a very odd question. Chaos is what Ron Paul stands for.

However, those who gave a pass to Kucinich were on the mark. Kucinich has a proven history of standing up for the people and resisting the corporations in their money grubing schemes. He did not keep quiet about the abortion that is the so called health bill, just no one listened.

Obama has betrayed the people who elected them. He has presented a bill that is a lie and as a great many observe it will be a lovely conduit of the peoples money into the pockets of the mega rich, just like his bail out of the investment community.

It is jobs the country needs and pay checks, not bonuses for fat headed bastards. This bill is a tragedy just waiting to happen. We need Nationalize Healthcare. Otherwise every salaried worker stand to be bankrupted at sometime in their lives from the bloodsucking insurance industry.

Report this

By MeHere, November 9, 2009 at 7:38 am Link to this comment

I have never found a satisfactory answer to the question:  Why is Kucinich still with the Democratic party where he’s never found any support for his decent political position? Is he another well-meaning but delusional figure who believes he can change or influence the party (including Democratic voters) in a significant way?  I really don’t know.  I’d like to hear some views on the subject from those who post here. Thanks.

Report this
Fat Freddy's avatar

By Fat Freddy, November 9, 2009 at 6:06 am Link to this comment

Mr Kucinich makes some valid points, unlike the Republican opposition. I don’t necessarily agree with all of them, but they are coherent and intelligent and are not the “red-meat” rantings of a John Boner or Michelle Bachmann or the logical fallacies presented by Lindsay Graham. Refreshing.  My question is, why did he wait until after the vote to go public with his concerns? I guess that “D” next to his name has something to do with it.

Report this

By ardee, November 9, 2009 at 5:59 am Link to this comment

You know damn well I am NOT in favor of “Israeli oppression” but AM in favor of Israeli existence.

I ,for one, see no such criticisms of “Israel Oppression” ( why the quotes ITW?) in your words. I do see an unyielding and illogical defense of the holocaust Israel perpetrates upon the people of Palestine.

Report this
thebeerdoctor's avatar

By thebeerdoctor, November 9, 2009 at 5:54 am Link to this comment

It becomes quite tiresome that if someone presents an accurate analysis (as in this case, Mr, Kucinich’s examination of the so-called Affordable Health Act) those who have no way to dispute the facts that are presented, instead choose to resort to crude name calling and petty vitriol of the silliest sort. What is true, as Representative Kucinich points out, that legislation such as this, is designed to create a never ending bureaucratic labyrinth in which monies can be legally stolen while responsible obligations are not-so-conveniently avoided. Examine the text, if you do not believe this to be true.
In a rather perverse way, this affordable health legislation is a stimulus package, designed to boost an industry that searches out loopholes for companies to drive the proverbial truck through… legally of course.
Another point that Dennis Kucinich points out, is why does the government find the need to create incentives to a multi-billion dollar profitable industry? The late Senator Kennedy’s efforts to tweak the patent timing on so-called biologic drugs is a prime example of that vision that seeks to accommodate predatory capitalism by providing a comfortable window for massive profit taking.
It is simply the nature of the beast, as Rep. Kucinich points out, and that falls completely in line with that line of thought that assumes that to make money is the only reason to do anything.

Report this

By dihey, November 9, 2009 at 5:47 am Link to this comment

Inherit-the-Wind are you a Democratic Congressperson who knows what is going on in the Democratic caucus or are you just sucking this out of your thumb?

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, November 9, 2009 at 4:48 am Link to this comment

Inherit is easy to understand because he is for Israeli oppression and anyone that supports it gets his approval.  And anyone who opposes it is a liar or anti-semite.
*************************************

You must have studied in the Joseph Goebbels School of Propaganda:  Keep repeating the Big Lie until it is accepted as the “truth”.

You know damn well I am NOT in favor of “Israeli oppression” but AM in favor of Israeli existence.

I guess is your narrow view anyone who doesn’t want Israel destroyed must be in favor of “Israeli oppression”.

You are genetically incapable of posting the truth about me.  Maybe you should step away from the keyboard.

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, November 9, 2009 at 4:44 am Link to this comment

paul bass, November 8 at 11:13 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

inherit the wind wrote
“he is the Democrats’ answer to the GOP’s pet lunatic, Michelle Bachmann. “

i have read your comments for some time now and mostly dont agree but i respect them and they are mostly rational.

but you just lost every drop of respect i had for you
**********************************************

Who are you and why should your opinion be meaningful to me?

It’s self-serving politicians like Kucinich in the Democratic caucus who CONSTANTLY prevent the Dems from getting ANYTHING done in Congress and set themselves up to lose control yet again.  The Re-Thuglicans, got THEIR agendas through, vile as they are, because they know how to STICK TOGETHER!

Dennis Kucinich is always part of the problem, not part of the solution.  Let him go independent and caucus with himself and the few independents in the House.

Report this

By bobbyjones, November 9, 2009 at 4:42 am Link to this comment

honesty and integrity are not huge in the democratic party.
Muscle Might

Report this
photoshock's avatar

By photoshock, November 9, 2009 at 4:19 am Link to this comment

Rep. Kucinich, is a thoughtful and effectual legislator, if given half a chance by the leadership of the Democratic Party, he could become a great legislator.
Yet, the leadership hampers him on every turn, they table his bills, because of his progressive and thoughtful legislation, which does not include the large ‘tax-exempt’ companies. Who by the way foot the bill for most of the re-election campaigns of the House and Senate members.
The people meanwhile, are not represented and hampered from their needs being met, by the very same legislators which have been bought and paid for by the military-industrial complex. This includes pharmaceuticals, insurance companies and most of all,
the companies such as Haliburton, which pay out millions of dollars each year to those whose election campaigns are in need of money and who will vote the ‘right’ way.
Dennis Kucinich has been and always will be a voice for the people, yet he is stifled from helping to enact legislation which would do just that.

Report this

By ardee, November 9, 2009 at 3:44 am Link to this comment

randolf_urts, November 8 at 7:50 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I didn’t quite catch the reasoning on this. Kucinich says we need single-payer. This bill would be a step in that direction.

Might I suggest that you reread the article and note the reasons Rep.Kucinich gives for his no vote. Apparently you failed to do so initially.

diamond, November 8 at 7:04 pm #

Kucinich is a dickhead and a lousy politician. Can yo imagine any other nation on earth where the President would be attacked for trying to being in a decent and humane health care system which will benefit most of the citizens and their children and grandchildren?

I failed to note where Kucinich attacked the President. He did, however, pointedly note his valid criticisms of this proposed bill. I find your characterization of Rep. Kucinich not much help and not very thoughtful.

Inherit The Wind, November 8 at 7:54 pm #

I rarely agreed with Diamond at all, but this is one time where I do, completely.  Dennis Kucinich continues to show why he is a TOTALLY ineffectual legislator, defended by unrealistic truthdiggers for not even having a CLUE to understanding the issues or what is at stake.

Let’s see; Rep.Kucinich details why he is against the proposed legislation, and quite eruditely in fact. ITW babbles from a strictly partisan position, mentions nothing concrete about that bill and simply engages in character assassination of any and all who fail to see the “wisdom” of his own position.

I think I would enjoy reading some specifics from ITW regarding his (blind?) support for this House bill..

Report this

By Ian Kocher, November 9, 2009 at 2:50 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Yes folks, this House bill is a poison pill.

By the single device of forbidding MediCare type payments to providers, Pelosi’s bill requires that the ‘public option’ pays all the country’s providers through contract negotiations. She has doomed true competition against the insurance giants, for the following reasons:

(1) Pelosi prohibits MediCare computers from paying providers as it has done successfully for decades. Instead, with the ‘public option’ bureaucrats must negotiate contracts with hundreds of thousands of providers, large and small, in thousands of locales, for varying rates and terms. This is a function only a private contractor can perform, not Medicare bureaucrats in Washington. So we are likely looking at costly private contracting, and a very slow start.

(2) A slow start means low customer count for providers. So why should providers lower their rates for the ‘public option’, as compared with what they charge Aetna, for example? Another potential competitive advantage is eliminated.

(3) The insurance giants often pay providers a set amount each month for every insured person, sick or not. This means that providers can profit greatly if they don’t have to perform many services. Pelosi’s ‘public option’ cannot pay providers this way, which means fewer providers would be interested in contracting with it.

(4) For the same reason as (1), (2) and (3), it will take longer, if ever, to establish a full provider network for every corner of the country. This means less incentive for you and I to pick the ‘public option’, as opposed to, say, Wellpoint.

Yes, by the simple device of prohibiting Medicare type payments, Pelosi has doomed the ‘public option’ from the start.

This, while poll after poll shows that Americans, by 2 to 1, want a ‘Medicare type’ public option. Pelosi’s bill is night and day from ‘Medicare type’. She is either very naive, or thinks we are.

Report this

By Folktruther, November 9, 2009 at 12:45 am Link to this comment

You hit the nail on the head, Xntrk, what this bill is doing is PREVENTING the an effective medical care program.  The house bill is the PROGRESSIVE version which will be further degraded in favor of the medical industry in the Senate.  Making the passage of an effective program, of the kind held by every other Western nation, much more difficult.

What Ameriaans need is socialized medicine.  But Amerians have been taught to be afraid of words and the idea of a socialist program that other countries have is simply un-american.  They rather die. liberally.  and Obama will take credit for a botched bill and campaign on it in 2012, which is why the bill doens’t begin until 2013.  So people will hear the rhetoric and media bullshit and not experience the reality.  and your reason for not voting of Kucinich is the same reason that I only gave him two cheers.

I don’t understand people like Diamand.  Inherit is easy to understand because he is for Israeli oppression and anyone that supports it gets his approval.  And anyone who opposes it is a liar or anti-semite.  But Diamand seems to identify with the Dem leadership for some reason, and I’ll be dammed if I can figure out why.  He is intelligent and knowledgable. 

And this is the reason that the American people are sold out again and again, they identify continually with the leadership of the major parties.  Emotionally.  and it is this emotional identification that must be transformed before Americans can unite against the plutocracy.

Report this

By Xntrk, November 8, 2009 at 10:42 pm Link to this comment

My Congresswoman, Mazie Hriono is a member of the Progressive Caucus. She has backed this bill all the way, to my disgust. When it became obvious that it would do nothing for the people, and not even begin until 2013, I urged her to vote NO - My reasoning is that no bill is better than a poorly constructed pay off to the Insurance Companies. I also have been around long enough to be aware that if this thing passes, it will be another 20 years before there’s another effort to provide Universal Single Payer health care in America.

The kicker for Mazie is that Hawaii is excluded anyway, because we already have a similar State system that covers more people. Its been in effect for over 20 years. There is even a clause in this bill, and the Senate version, that allows Hawaii to opt out.

So, it is politics as usual. The coffers of the Pols are full to overflowing, and the Public gets screwed - again!

Once again, Kucinich wins some kudos, but not my vote. Push comes to shove, he is still a Democrat, not an Independent, Green, or Socialist.

Report this

By whyzowl1, November 8, 2009 at 10:39 pm Link to this comment

The Great Unspoken that underlies this entire “Health Care Debate” (or would it better be described as a “Debacle?”), is that the United States can no longer pretend to be a civilized country or care about human rights unless and until it provides health care to all of its citizens. The rest of the world just can’t believe the cruelty, inhumanity and avarice of the American ruling crass (not a typo).

So, it looks like this is as good as it gets. Once the House bill is through being even further watered down in conference committee with the Senate, there will be nothing left but benefits, subsidies and “incentives” for the voracious parasites in the Health Industrial Complex.

Where the leaders lack any vision (beyond the bottom line); the people perish (literally). The United States is not falling behind in the great Civilization Sweepstakes; it’s not even in the race.

What the lavish Wall Street bailout demonstrated, is that this country has deep, deep markets and incredible wealth available to it. It can do just about anything it has a will to. As usual, it’s the ole’ one finger salute to the American people, and a generous helping hand to the undeserving, parasitic rich.

This is a sick, sick society; but it’s not the kind of sickness that can be treated by our health care providers. It’s a sickness of the soul.

IS THERE A PHILOSOPHER IN THE HOUSE?

Report this

By Mojogoober, November 8, 2009 at 9:57 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

diamond-
“Can yo imagine any other nation on earth where the President would be attacked for trying to being in a decent and humane health care system which will benefit most of the citizens and their children and grandchildren?”

No. I can’t imagine that. Of course that’s not what’s happening here. We have a President being attacked for making a lousy health care system worse in order to benefit the corporations that own him.

As mentioned, Kucinich has the HUGE balls to point this out and gets attacked for not following the Democrat corporate line. The rest of the world shakes it collective head.

Report this

By Rodrigo, November 8, 2009 at 8:40 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Worth reaading.  Dennis analysis offers some very good points, although I ultimately disagree with his prognosis – the key faulty assumption being that the way to increase competition (and lower costs) is by having government compete with insurance companies instead of removing current barriers to new entrants and competition – unfortunately the government can never compete effectively by its very nature.  What we’ll is a system that divides the population into rich and poor - the poor will get the public option while the rich use the private one.  And since it would be dumb to compete with a tax-funded enterprise that doesn’t have to make a profit, no private company will enter the low end of the market, creating a mini-monopoly there with its natural consequences for the quality of service as seen in the vast majority of government run enterprises – so the division will only deepen with time.  I’m very sorry.

Cheers,

Report this

By Political Atheist., November 8, 2009 at 8:37 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Kuccinich/Paul for President. Or Paul/Kucinich. I don’t care. At least we’d get two HONEST men.

I am sick of politicians. Why are there only two damn STATESMEN in all of America?

Report this

By diamond, November 8, 2009 at 8:27 pm Link to this comment

Amen, inherit. The world is watching this debacle the way you watch relatives tearing each other apart at a Christmas barbeque or a really bad birthday party. On this issue Kucinich is as bad as Liebermann: he’s certainly no help. I’m sick of grandstanding politicians who care more about their own egos than they do about the voters. 

The only politician I’ve ever truly admired used to often change his mind on issues the voters didn’t support and when the snarling dogs of the media confronted him and tried to say he was weak he used to shrug and say ‘The voters are the boss’. He retired undefeated. 70% of Americans want health care reform. Gee, what do to? What a dilemma! The health insurance companies know damn well that the public option will provide competition and bring health care costs down and they’d rather stick pins in their eyes. They’ll fight it to their last breath but for a Democrat to vote against Obama’s health care bill, knowing the forces ranged against him, is outrageous.

Report this

By Bud, November 8, 2009 at 7:49 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Dennis Kucinich has more balls than Brunswick.Barack Obama has lost the support of my entire family in 2012.We need a good strong independent candidate in 2012.Will Chuck Hagle please stand up??

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, November 8, 2009 at 7:20 pm Link to this comment

I wish he was the current president…..

Report this

By paul bass, November 8, 2009 at 7:13 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

inherit the wind wrote
“he is the Democrats’ answer to the GOP’s pet lunatic, Michelle Bachmann. “

i have read your comments for some time now and mostly dont agree but i respect them and they are mostly rational.

but you just lost every drop of respect i had for you

Report this

By paul bass, November 8, 2009 at 7:05 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

well if all of you stupid americans did not fall for the whole “racist game” we could have had a president who has actual principles… and shock.. stand by them!

Report this

By Nick, November 8, 2009 at 6:50 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I find it bizarre that people who are welcoming to the ideas of Kucinich are also willing to recruit Ron Paul and place him in the same category of men.  Ron Paul, a man seemingly true to his convictions, is beneficent as an advocate for the dismantlement of the military industrial complex and his positions on civil liberties.  However, one should be reminded that this is the same man who has just gone on the record as denying the fact of Darwinian evolution while effusively evangelizing for the faith of laissez faire capitalism.  Ron Paul would accelerate the privatization of government functions and replace the progressive embrace of social democracy with an ethos of consumerist citizenship.  Under Ron Paul’s vision inequality would continue unabated while poverty, human suffering, and environmental degradation would be exacerbated. Oh and don’t forget the threat of Christian theocracy and the assault on science education.  As a progressive I am deeply concerned at the level of support Ron Paul has garnered within the progressive community.  Paul captures our imagination in his revolutionary rhetoric, which is understandable given the hopeless sentiments. Nonetheless, one’s ability to overthrow a broken government is one thing.  The ability to build anew with the “best means” to achieve the most necessary outcomes is another.  The distinction between Kucinich and Paul lies here and should not be overlooked.

Report this

By Aarky, November 8, 2009 at 6:29 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I had asked my Senators Lincoln and Pryor from Arkansas to vote for the health care bill when it came to the Senate. The bill has been gutted of any meaningful regulation by the insurance industry lobbyists and filled with so many poison pills that it isn’t worth the vote. I certainly respect the opinion of Congressman Kucinich much more that Congressman Boozman, who also voted aginst the bill. Boozman voted no because he has the intellect of a clam and followed party direction. Kucinich voted against the bill because he saw how deeply flawed it was. I will now contact Senators Lincoln and Pryor and suggest that they follow Kucinich’s lead.
The real kick in the butt is that it is all part of the plot by the Insurance industry. They have spent an estimated $200 million to lobby against the bill and they will win because the one that would make it out of Congress stinks so much that it isn’t worth passing. The tasbards are laughing their butts off.

Report this

By Kerry Burke Mackenzie, November 8, 2009 at 6:04 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Isn’t something better than nothing?  Maybe if we can make progress in small steps… eventually we will go the whole distance.

NOW wanted me to protest the passing of reform because it scapegoats women.  I understand, but in this country, with so many uninformed people, we will never make big strides all at once… but maybe sneak a few steps in the right direction?

Report this

By Forrest R., November 8, 2009 at 5:58 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

If I was a smart capitalist, I would have invested in the success of the insurance companies that seem to always get their way at the expense of hard-working average Americans. Maybe I have something in common with Dennis. Neither of us will benefit financially, while keeping some semblance of personal integrity, which goes a long way for getting a good nights rest. Dennis has honorably stood his ground for what seems like a no-brainer to me; the blatant bullying of big business that remains relentless and yet faceless. A faceless human being, a diseased organism. Appeasing Rep. and corporate interests is what we are getting from this so-called “for the people” President. The Change we got was a darn good speaker, period.

Report this

By joell, November 8, 2009 at 5:53 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

@Ed Harges “I’ve given lots of money to Kucinich over the years, because he proves himself again
and again. He’s great.”

Kucinich’s role is to keep alienated voters like you within the party; and he will continue to make the “tremendously courageous, principled” votes. He’s’  proof there’s hope for reforming the party.

however, during the election year, he will endorse and campaign for any sleazy democrat running for president. he did it with Gore, Kerry, Obama, and he would have done the same with hillary.

i don’t like Ron Paul, but i respect him for not endorsing or campaigning for McCain. i just wish Kucinich had the “balls” to do the same.

Report this

By p.d., November 8, 2009 at 5:33 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

“We cannot fault the insurance companies for being what they are. “

Wrong.  Profit should never be an alibi for letting people die.  Not by the government, not by the lobbyists and not by the corporations.

Report this
Ed Harges's avatar

By Ed Harges, November 8, 2009 at 5:24 pm Link to this comment

I’ve given lots of money to Kucinich over the years, because he proves himself
again and again. He’s great.

And Truthdig, as far as I’ve noticed, doesn’t seem to have paid any attention to
Kucinich’s other recent vote that was tremendously courageous, principled, and
important: Kucinich voted against our AIPAC-owned Congress’s bipartisan
condemnation of the Goldstone Report on Israel’s murderous crimes in Gaza.

Truthdiggers, give your support to Kucinich: he’s just about the only politician
that deserves it.

Report this

By FreeWill, November 8, 2009 at 5:04 pm Link to this comment

Isn’t amazing that the smallest guy has the biggest balls!  Thank God there are at least a few representatives who are representing the people not the Corporations!  It’s a pity that so many people are brainwashed by Corporate media into believing the BS that we are constantly feed. (Diamond & Inherit.. (full of wind) Prime examples of people who can not think for them selves but have lots to condemn other for.
  Dennis has always worked for the common mans interest and any one that doubts his ethics or dedication to the common good, needs to look into what he has accomplished. Unlike our well spoken President who has pissed away any chance of real health care reform in order to satisfy his Corporate Masters and accomplished nothing for the average citizen. 
  Wake up America our government has been taken over by the Ultra Rich. For the most part neither party represents you! Kucinich is one of the few exceptions!

Report this

By Miko, November 8, 2009 at 4:51 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Kucinich 2012.

Report this

By StratMatt, November 8, 2009 at 4:36 pm Link to this comment

I would be happy if our President was Deniss Kucinich a man of true integrity . Heck I might even be happy with Ron Paul who votes his conscience even though hes not liberal .. These 2 men are a rarity on capitol schill…

Report this

By freedom loving american, November 8, 2009 at 4:18 pm Link to this comment

Dennis Kucinich is one of the of the few democrats that actually tries to represents the people rather than simply always caving to big business wishes.  Granted in historic terms he is far from “liberal” as he is well aware, but since 1980 the term liberal gets applied to anyone with either a brain or conscious..  The term moderate is used to describe dems that are far to the right of Hoover.

So for those that are critical of Kucinich please pull your heads out of your ##@ before it is too late, or if you are a repuke simply keep it there no one will notice.

Report this

By Tim, November 8, 2009 at 4:15 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Diamond,

I’d like to give you a homework assignment: Please research a short while (read) on how else a politician might go about “receiving” more spending cash than he/she would get from the yearly taxpayer alottment. For instance, you might find that only a handful (five) of senators are NOT millionaires. Come on, lets brainstorm (think) about why that is. It might lead you to see a rarity like Mr. Kucinich in a different light.

Report this

By freedom loving american, November 8, 2009 at 4:15 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Dennis Kucinich is one of the of the few democrats that actually tries to represents the people rather than simply always caving to big business wishes.  Granted in historic terms he is far from “liberal” as he is well aware, but since 1980 the term liberal gets applied to anyone with either a brain or conscious..  The term moderate is used to describe dems that are far to the right of Hoover.

So for those that are critical of Kucinich please pull your heads out of your ass before it is too late, or if you are a repuke simply keep it there no one will notice.

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, November 8, 2009 at 3:54 pm Link to this comment

I rarely agreed with Diamond at all, but this is one time where I do, completely.  Dennis Kucinich continues to show why he is a TOTALLY ineffectual legislator, defended by unrealistic truthdiggers for not even having a CLUE to understanding the issues or what is at stake.  Dennis the Menace yet again shows why he is the Democrats’ answer to the GOP’s pet lunatic, Michelle Bachmann.

Report this

By jackpine savage, November 8, 2009 at 3:54 pm Link to this comment

Congressman,

Thank you for voting your conscience and your duty to work on behalf of your constituents. This is a terrible bill that can only get worse; it will be rammed down our collective throats; and many will proclaim it a great victory.

Diamond,

You’re a fool. The few positive aspects of this bill will be destroyed in the Senate. The administration is not working to help us “voters” in any way, shape or form. Tell me how you figure forcing us to buy over-priced private policies that will leave us under-covered is going to help anything but send more people to the poor house because they happened to get sick?

Your president is working for his corporate sponsors: he, apparently, cares not one whit for you, me or anyone else.

Report this
G.Anderson's avatar

By G.Anderson, November 8, 2009 at 3:52 pm Link to this comment

For the last year or so, our so called political leaders have engaged in a deep and far reaching obfuscation, of health care reform.

One in which millions of dollars were paid to influence not only their decision but their vote.

Rather than liberating Americans from the predatory practices of the health care corporations, they have added yet another burden on to all of us. This bill is not health care reform, it is instead a big pay day, with the tax payer picking up the tab.

As such it will speed the day when this government will no longer be solvent.

The American government is missing in action, and there is no one to fill in for them. Certainly the corporations won’t do it.

Yes Dennis, I agree, without a strong public option, doing nothing was a better idea.

Unfortunately, that’s all congress seems to do lately, bow and scrape to wall street, sell out the public and make the tax payer responsible for their weaknesses. This can’t go on forever, and it won’t.

We are already on the brink, and sending 34,000 more soldiers to Afghanistan, under cover of the health care reform vote announcement, was just the sort of thing that W., used to do.

Are we making any progess?

Report this

By randolf_urts, November 8, 2009 at 3:50 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I didn’t quite catch the reasoning on this. Kucinich
says we need single-payer. This bill would be a step in
that direction. Is it just not a big enough step? How
is standing still better? This is at least going
somewhere.

Report this

By Matt, November 8, 2009 at 3:46 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

There are a few people who on capitol hill that actually support average little people (majority) and not a special interest Deniss Kucinich and Dr. Ron Paul are 2 that come to mind from different sides of the aisle but both have integrity.

Report this

By Hank from Nebraska, November 8, 2009 at 3:29 pm Link to this comment

I don’t understand either of the comments above by diamond and Folktruther, but I certainly do understand Kucinich’s vote.  The House healthcare bill is a sham that will not reduce the high costs of U.S. healthcare.  I would say the bill is pretty much designed to make the insurance companies even richer and to impose the bill on middle class taxpayers. 
We will never improve the system until we accept a single payer system or a tightly regulated non-profit system.  It is Obama who should be condemned for the failure of the process; he never supporting real reform but dealt with the corporate interests behind closed doors. 
In any case, the House bill will not match the Senate’s bill, if there even is a Senate bill.  We may yet end up with an even worse bill covering fewer people at even higher costs!  These guys are not yet done doing damage.
At least Kucinich is honest and accurate. He is a refreshing change from business as usual in Washington.

Report this

By GW=MCHammered, November 8, 2009 at 3:28 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

sick around the world
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/sickaroundtheworld

Report this

By Voodooeconomix, November 8, 2009 at 3:15 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The Good the Bad and the Ugly

The Good = Liberals, Progressives
The Bad = Almost every Republican and Lieberman
The Ugly = Centrist Moderate Swing Voters and “Realists” They include Dems and Repugs

The Ugly have no Values. They blow with the wind. They fight for power and position and will take any position to win. This is why they are ugly.

I respect the Bad. They have evil values but they Value their evil. And will fight like Dogs to protect the Values.

The Liberals need to fight harder if they want to remain in the good. They risk becoming ugly if they sell out to centrists who want a victory at any cost.

The Ugly are scum who label and libel liberals who would have achieved a far greater bill than this if they would have been in power. And if they would have lost it would have been the Good fight. Centrists sold half the farm before the negotiations even started. The Ugly don’t go for good policy. They go for trophies.

The Ugly “Moderates” call Liberals whiny babies. The Moderates are shapeless shifty weasels who wouldn’t recognize good policy anyway. They’re too busy shining their trophy collections.

Report this

By diamond, November 8, 2009 at 3:04 pm Link to this comment

Kucinich is a dickhead and a lousy politician. Can you imagine any other nation on earth where the President would be attacked for trying to being in a decent and humane health care system which will benefit most of the citizens and their children and grandchildren? The Democrats who voted against this bill are a disgrace and it’s a pity they can’t be sacked and replaced with people who actually care about the voters who pay their salaries.

Report this

By diamond, November 8, 2009 at 3:04 pm Link to this comment

Kucinich is a dickhead and a lousy politician. Can yo imagine any other nation on earth where the President would be attacked for trying to being in a decent and humane health care system which will benefit most of the citizens and their children and grandchildren? The Democrats who voted against this bill are a disgrace and it’s a pity they can’t be sacked and replaced with people who actually care about the voters who pay their salaries.

Report this

By Folktruther, November 8, 2009 at 2:57 pm Link to this comment

Let’s hear it for truthdig.  they published an honest and corageous critique of this bill midst all the other truth pimps they publish.  Kucinich does the best he can, given that he is a Dem.  Truthdig has a long way to go.  but a journey of a thousand miles….

Report this

Page 2 of 2 pages  <  1 2

Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.