LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 21, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Rise Up or Die

Revenge of the Bear: Russia Strikes Back in Syria

Tumblr Is Worth $1.1 Billion to Yahoo For One Reason: You

Real American Boy: How Our Byzantine Immigration System and Failed Economy May Have Made a Terrorist

It's News, Not Espionage

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * It’s News, Not Espionage

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Act of Congress
Daily Rituals
The Girls of Atomic City

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar
All the Sad Young Literary Men

All the Sad Young Literary Men

By Keith Gessen
$16.47

more items

 
Reports

When Did Olympia Snowe Become Queen of America?

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Oct 15, 2009
Olympia Snowe
AP / Charles Dharapak

The courtship of Snowe in the name of bipartisanship provides cover for those Democrats who want to weaken health care reform to please their health industry donors.

By David Sirota

I don’t get it.

I know that’s the simplistic refrain of every 10-year-old, but I’m 33 and I mean it: I just don’t get it.

Specifically, I don’t get why Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine—or any Republican senator, for that matter—is attracting so much attention.

In the last few months, Democratic senators eliminated the public option and substantially weakened their health care proposals in order to buy insurance industry acquiescence and, thus, Snowe’s vote. Now, based on the deafening media noise, all of American politics is focused on this unaccomplished backbencher and whether or not she will endorse the final bill. It is as if Republicans control Congress—as if Snowe, not Barack Obama, won the biggest presidential landslide since Ronald Reagan.

This is bizarre for what should be obvious reasons.

Advertisement

First of all, Snowe’s much-celebrated initial vote this week for an embarrassingly flaccid health care initiative wasn’t necessary to pass the bill—Democrats had enough votes to move the legislation out of the Senate Finance Committee without her approval. That’s a mathematical fact, as is the fact that Democrats control the 60 votes to overcome a filibuster with or without Snowe; as is the fact that Democrats have the 51 votes to enact health care reform through a parliamentary procedure called reconciliation—again, with or without Snowe.

So the notion that Snowe’s vote—or any GOP vote—is inherently pivotal to health care reform is a fantasy created by the Beltway media and the Democratic congressional leadership. The former is desperately trying to manufacture headline-grabbing drama; the latter is looking for a Republican excuse to water down the bill and protect corporate interests—all while absolving Democrats of legislative responsibility.

Second, the idea that Snowe’s support will result in the final legislation being called “bipartisan”—and that such billing will politically protect Democrats—is absurd. How do we know this? Because Democrats themselves taught us that via the Iraq war.

Recall that with solid Democratic and Republican backing, the 2002 Iraq resolution was far more “bipartisan” than any health care bill will ever be. Yet, Democrats turned right around and used the Iraq war to criticize Republicans—and because the conflict was so wildly unpopular, Americans in 2006 and 2008 were willing to overlook the contradiction and vote for the only major party echoing any semblance of an anti-war message.

On health care, it will be the same in reverse: The GOP will invariably attempt to turn any bill into an electoral cudgel against Democrats—regardless of how many Republicans end up voting for it.

The lesson, then, is simple: If Democrats’ hypocritical Iraq criticism worked only because the war was such a disaster, then the GOP’s inevitable health care attacks—however hypocritical—can be thwarted only by making health care reform the opposite of Iraq (i.e., a major success). For Democrats, in other words, good health care policy is great politics, and bad policy is the worst politics.

Whether passed by one congressional vote or 50, real reform that improves the system (i.e., a bill with a public option, tough insurance regulation and universal coverage) would transform the Democratic Party into an election-winning force forever known as “the generous protector of middle-class interests,” as GOP strategist William Kristol admits. Conversely, even if passed unanimously, bad legislation that makes the system worse (i.e., a bill empowering insurance companies, preventing a public option and leaving millions uncovered) would make GOP criticism of Democrats extremely effective.

That’s a truism, no matter if Snowe or any other Republicans add their support to a health care bill that doesn’t actually need it in the first place.

David Sirota is the author of the best-selling books “Hostile Takeover” and “The Uprising.” He hosts the morning show on AM 760 in Colorado and blogs at OpenLeft.com. E-mail him at ds@davidsirota.com.

© 2009 Creators.com


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

ThomasG's avatar

By ThomasG, October 25, 2009 at 1:26 pm Link to this comment

ardee, October 24 at 4:13pm

Blah.

Report this
Outraged's avatar

By Outraged, October 24, 2009 at 11:51 pm Link to this comment

Re: David Sirota

Good title.

Report this

By Michael Shaw, October 24, 2009 at 2:12 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Taowalker, I apologize for the rebellion statement. I realize there was no actual talk of rebellion on your part. I guess I was thinking out loud when you mentioned gated communities, things that will lock out the rest of the huddled masses while holding in all the resources we need to survive. I see the potential future as being similar to the Israeli settlements, the fortress cities that steal not only Palestinian land but more importantly their water.

The attempted corporate privatization of water is not a coincidence. It is the oil war of the future. The downtrodden middle class and the disenfranchising of the poor is no accident and although I agree with most of what you were and still are talking about, I believe “We the People,” are not going to go quietly into the night should the moment arrive. Do I wish to see this happen? No! I never meant to suggest you wanted this either. Again I apologize!

Unless something is done, the continued escapades of unfettered capitalism will in the end produce the same results that led to the storming of the winter palace and the horrors of Robespierre. Thus come the scraps from Longshank’s table in the form of universal health care.

Of course we will not in, all likelihood, get the most pragmatic option, Medicare for all, a system that is already up and running and in fact quite successful (beyond Bush’s plan D antics geared to destroy it). But alas, in the end I fear we will get a watered down public option that will as always give the insurance industry and the pharmaceutical corporations exactly what they want rather then what we need. It is however an attempt at least to a third way as described by Naomi Klein in Disaster Capitalism. In the end of course and as always, it is up to us. As you undoubtedly know, people affect change, not politicians.

Obama makes a big mistake by surrounding himself with people who created this economic crisis in the hopes they will undo the great wrongs. His gestures at limiting corporate salaries on those who received TARP funding is thus far more talk then action. I hope he realizes we realize it. It seems he is getting a bit more aggressive with Wall Street at least. We need to keep the pressure on as he eggs to the next election. That is our only leverage. This will in fact save America.

Report this

By ardee, October 24, 2009 at 1:13 pm Link to this comment

ThomasG, October 24 at 12:18 pm #

Blah.

....................................

The extent of your intellect,so sad. All sound and fury, signifying nothing..I didnt know you were a contemporary of Will Shakespeare…He seems to have known you well.

Report this
ThomasG's avatar

By ThomasG, October 24, 2009 at 9:18 am Link to this comment

ardee, October 24 at 9:32am,

Blah.

Report this

By ardee, October 24, 2009 at 6:32 am Link to this comment

ThomasG, October 23 at 12:34 pm #

ardee, October 21 at 6:37am,

ardee said 10/21: “Err, too subtle for you,Thomas? The man I referred to was not Grayson, though he too has only nine months experience. I was speaking about a man whose decision making power rather exceeds that of the honorable Mr.G.”

BUT:

quoting ardee’s statement 10/20 at 6:31am on this same thread:

“Yes, I am speaking about Rep. Grayson, who did you think?”

********************************************

You are Rush Limbaugh, are you not? You take two sentences, from two different posts and put them together to prove that you are a despicable, slime trail leaving piece of excrement…Congratulations moron.

Report this
ThomasG's avatar

By ThomasG, October 23, 2009 at 9:34 am Link to this comment

ardee, October 21 at 6:37am,

ardee said 10/21: “Err, too subtle for you,Thomas? The man I referred to was not Grayson, though he too has only nine months experience. I was speaking about a man whose decision making power rather exceeds that of the honorable Mr.G.”

BUT:

quoting ardee’s statement 10/20 at 6:31am on this same thread:

“Yes, I am speaking about Rep. Grayson, who did you think?”

ardee, What is your current SUBJECTIVE claim with regard to the OBJECTIVE facts as related in your post???????

How exactly does your OBJECTIVE statement of “Yes, I am speaking about Rep. Grayson,” SUBJECTIVELY morph into “I was speaking about a man whose decision making power rather exceeds that of the honorable Mr.G.”???????

I know that all of YOU Right-Wing Conservative EXTREMISTS want to claim that everything is SUBJECTIVE, so that “You People” cannot be held to account for YOUR claims of amorphous nonsense, but Shenonymous has already admitted that “shit in a bucket” is OBJECTIVE.  How do YOU reconcile YOUR OBJECTIVE conflicting claims? ——and, how does the Right-Wing Conservative EXTREMISTS reconcile all of their conflicting claims,—now that Shenonymous has admitted that “shit in a bucket” really is OBJECTIVE

Report this

By ardee, October 21, 2009 at 3:37 am Link to this comment

ThomasG, October 20 at 5:40 pm

Err, too subtle for you,Thomas? The man I referred to was not Grayson, though he too has only nine months experience. I was speaking about a man whose decision making power rather exceeds that of the honorable Mr.G.

But then again, you seem to have gone off your meds of late.

Report this
ThomasG's avatar

By ThomasG, October 20, 2009 at 2:40 pm Link to this comment

ardee, October 20 at 4:09pm,

We have had the idiot Ronald Wilson Reagan, an actor, that played the part of President; another idiot that wanted to know “What is this vision thing, anyway?”—George H. W. Bush and lastly “W” Bush that abdicated all of his responsibility to Dick Cheney; YOU do not ask, why Reagan?—YOU do not ask why Bush I?—YOU do not ask why “W” Bush? —while the masses of the population of the United States are paying TENS of TRILLIONS of DOLLARS to clean up their mess.  After all that has happened; YOU only ask how a man, Florida Rep. Alan Grayson that is a Harvard Graduate, that has qualifications that relegate Reagan, Bush I and Bush II to the status of flat worms, who with exactly nine months in office can be relied upon to make great change.

Rep. Alan Grayson can be relied upon because he has the experience of education, because he is not a Conservative Right-Wing EXTREMIST savant, because Rep. Grayson has creative, abstract, figurative and dynamic intelligence and is a leader, all of which Reagan, Bush I and Bush II were NOT, and did not even have the ability to understand that they did not; and YOU, as a Right-Wing Conservative EXTREMIST have the effrontery to question Florida Rep. Alan Grayson who has good sense, education, understanding and leadership ability that NONE of the Conservative Right-Wing EXTREMISTS from Goldwater through Reagan, Bush I and Bush II have had.

Report this

By ardee, October 20, 2009 at 1:09 pm Link to this comment

ThomasG, October 20 at 10:32 am #

I wonder, Thomas, why you insist on portraying yourself as such an asshole? I asked a rather simple question really, and here it is again:


“I wonder how a man with exactly nine months in office and inexperienced on the national level can be relied upon to make great changes?”

Instead of even attempting any sort of lucid answer you posted a bunch of bold typed bullshit. Why I wonder would you even bother?

Report this
ThomasG's avatar

By ThomasG, October 20, 2009 at 7:32 am Link to this comment

ardee, October 20 at 6:31am,

ardee said: “I wonder how a man with exactly nine months in office and inexperienced on the national level can be relied upon to make great changes?”

Shenonymous, October 19 at 6:23pm on Truthdig “War on Language” said: “Both shit and bucket will be objective facts verified not only by scientific examination.”

ThomasG’s answer: I wonder about you, ardee, a person that don’t know the difference between subjective “shit in a bucket” and objective “shit in a bucket” and why anyone would care about what you think, when you and all of the rest of your knuckle dragging Neanderthal troglodyte Right-Wing Conservative EXTREMISTS are always trying to peddle subjective “shit in a bucket” as if it is objective reality that does not stink.

Report this

By ardee, October 20, 2009 at 3:31 am Link to this comment

I wonder how a man with exactly nine months in office and inexperienced on the national level can be relied upon to make great changes?

Yes, I am speaking about Rep. Grayson, who did you think? No significant seniority, no important committee appointments, a great position I understand and applaud but how can this one man, or three or even ten, turn the colossus that is the Democratic Party from its rightward course?

Report this
MarthaA's avatar

By MarthaA, October 19, 2009 at 7:00 pm Link to this comment

“Congressman Alan Grayson and PCCC Delivering Petition to Senator Harry Reid

http://www.actblue.com/page/reidaccountable?refcode=f-bcn

The solution is support of Congressman Alan Grayson and his quest as a leader to remove Right-Wing Conservative EXTREMIST toadies and cooperators from leadership positions in the Democratic Party.”

From listening to Alan Grayson on ThomasG’s post, and after seeing and hearing Alan Grayson in the news recently, it sounds like Florida Congressman Alan Grayson, a Harvard graduate, has the solution, the knowledge and backbone to clean up the liberal side of the political spectrum.  Grayson’s appearance on the scene has definitely restored hope in this old liberal.

Report this

By TAO Walker, October 19, 2009 at 5:20 pm Link to this comment

Michael Shaw is mistaken below.  This Old Indian actually said nothing at all about “rebellion” in the earlier post here….nor has that word or any of its common equivalents appeared in other comments offered on this site.

What has been suggested regularly is that only by getting together in actual organic communities, where they live and breathe everyday, and so helping one another rather than their make-believe “selfs,” will the CONfused and terrified masses of presently atomized and artifactual “individuals” have any chance at all of coming through the catastrophic collapse of the “global” CONtraption presently hell-bent on exploiting them all to-death….for fun and profit.  “Rebellion” itself is essentially an expression of CONtrived immaturity, and always takes place on terms set by the oppressive regime which the “rebels” want to overthrow and replace with one based on pretty much the same set of assumptions, only with theirownselves in-charge.  The feckless attempts of the “civilized nations” to “conquer” Nature, and to replace Her Living Arrangement with some pitifully inadequate and counterfeit CONstruct of their own device and CONceit, is in-effect the “model” for all the political/social/economic “revolutions” the domesticated peoples’ve become so enamored-of and addicted-to.

The CONglomeration of CONditions overwhelming homo domesticus here in these latter days are, at their very roots, purely BIOLOGICAL in nature.  They’ve come about as the inevitable CONsequence of engineered ignorance and institutionalized stupidity.  A severely handicapped sub-species of Humanity, made captive to purposes and processes avowedly inimical to the Natural Living Arrangement of our Mother Earth, have run hard up against the exceedingly (and dead-certain to prove fatally) CONstrictive limits of their own artificially induced and organically foolhardy behavior.

Recovering the integrity of their organic function within Life’s Song ‘n’ Dance here, by returning to the organic form in-keeping with that function, is The Way open to our tame Sisters and Brothers in their increasingly desperate search for some viable alternative to the destructive end guaranteed by going on much further with the idiotic “dominance” paradigm.  There isn’t a snowball’s chance in hell some self-obsessed and random collection of (even 6-plus billion) “individuals” will “subdue The Earth,” nevermind the whole Living Universe.  Those who are able to recognize the sheer folly of such grandiose ambitions might yet join us free wild survivors of the now-coming-to-its-CONclusion “global” holocaust to carry-on in the given place of Humankind here.

The rest we’ll have to catch later.

HokaHey!

Report this

By ardee, October 19, 2009 at 12:53 pm Link to this comment

Jones, October 17 at 2:22 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Many who commented here need to enlist in the Army or Air Force or Navy on Monday, first thing, don’t wait. Learn to be a real American. 

I served, have you?  Anyone?

.........................

Most will ignore you I think, and I do not blame them for it. Several of us here,at least, have seen combat in fact. But what exactly that has to do with the topic at hand is a mystery. Neither does serving in the armed forces give one any cachet to think they know better than one who has not served.

Report this

By Louise, October 19, 2009 at 11:23 am Link to this comment

Fame can be a real downer.

For someone who wants to try and do the right thing, there’s a twelve body deep circle of people to peer through, while trying to see what the right thing to do is.

And then there’s the “kings servant psychosis”. That’s when the servants are actually more demanding and more precise and more snobbish and more inclined to prevent penetration into the inner sanctum than the king is! The conceit of the “kings servant psychosis” actually leads to the servants making critical decisions in the name of protecting the king, that are not actually in the king’s best interests.

Fortunately we do not live in a class society composed of royalty, the royal servants, their snobby, pretentious courtiers, the kings knights and everybody else.

Sometimes it just looks that way. smile

What we actually have is a president surrounded by a twelve body deep group of officials, advisers, experts, pretend experts, secret service, and generally nondescript know-it-alls. Sometimes a president is hard put to be heard through the din.

That’s when our unique form of freedom steps in.

We are blessed with a Plethora of news breakers, makers and wonks, who all know more about everything than anything, and are there to think for us, 24/7. And since there are far to many of them looking for breaking news to hold our attention, they often take a one-line comment from anybody, about anything, create a breaking news, news story around it, then turn it over to the 24/7 analysts, who analyse it to death!

Eventually it filters back to the guy at the top, the president, and he has to start back-peddling. Or, (lest he confuse the easily confused) go along with it for a time. Sometimes it seems he has to spend more time re-spinning the spin, than actually getting things done.

The price of fame.

Then there’s that other kind of fame. The fame the seeker never sought, but because of the breaking news, news breakers need, becomes the focus to explain the unexplainable. The inevitable result is the object of that fame, in this case Olympia Snowe, actually begins to believe the spin around her. She does indeed begin to believe she is the queen. Ready and eager, (if not able) to play the role.

The rude awakening of reality awaits her in the wings.

Report this

By Baronscarpia, October 19, 2009 at 6:03 am Link to this comment

This piece falls just short of the critical inference that needs to be made from Sen. Snowe’s prominence on this issue.  It is that the Congressional leadership of the Democratic Party knows that the magical, 60 vote seat total they have in the Senate is not , “filibuster-proof.”  That is a fiction created by the media which chooses to ignore the real political stripes of faux Democrat Senators like both Nelsons, Max Baucus, Mary Landrieu and others, as well as the despicable Joe Lieberman. Knowing they can’t win a filibuster fight with Republicans, Democratic leadership prefer to meekly capitulate beforehand than expose the reality that sending candidates with a Democratic label to Congress is not enough for voters to assure the end of Republican policies. 

They are abject, pathetic cowards.

In fact, without a PUBLIC vote on the public option, we may never know where Democratic Senators really stand on the issue.  Chuck Schumer, a confirmed DLC toadie, states publicly that he supports it, and that certainly ingratiates himself with his constituency, but how do we know how he really would vote for it if there is no vote?  For all we know he’s “on board” with the insurers and Big Pharma…and they know it, and the Dem leadership knows it…but WE’LL never know it because he won’t be forced to make his support a matter of public record.

Adding to the problem is the fact that we have a deluded Democratic president who believes that “bipartisanship” has intrinsic value.  That gives the timorous Democratic leadership cover to surrender, under the banner of “bipartisanship,” on ANY issue.  Tom Delay, who never allowed a single vote to come to the floor of the House unless he was CERTAIN the Republicans had the votes to pass it - whatever the Democrats might do - and went so far as to deny to Democrats any opportunity to speak out on the floor against Bush’s first budget, must giggle out loud every time Obama helps Republicans by boosting the value of “bipartisanship.”  Rush Limbaugh said to CPAC - “To us, bipartisanship is them being forced to agree with us after we politically have cleaned their clocks and beaten them.” 

Republicans clearly understand the only true value of bipartisanship in this country - it’s that they don’t practice it and Democrats do.  Ted Kennedy practically fell over his tongue running to the White House to support No Child Left Behind, Joe Lieberman, as a defeated Democratic candidate for Veep, gleefully supported the unconstitutional faith based “initiatives.”  What, exactly, have Republicans given Obama as a “tit” for the Dem’s “tat?” 

Birthers.

Organized rabble rousers at town meetings on health care.

When independent “swing” voters assess what’s happened in the four years prior to 2012, they will return to the Republican fold by the millions.  When they see that Democrats, even with a whopping majority, couldn’t be trusted to use their advantage to improve American life with significant improvement and availability of affordable health care, tightening of government regulations to prevent economic calamities of the type we’re now enduring, disengagement from multiple disastrous wars, achievement (and recovery) of civil rights denied by Republican regimes, openness and fairness in government relations and negotiations with multi-billion dollar corporations - all of which Obama and the Democrats PROMISED us - voters will conclude that voting Republican is in their best interests.

After all, Republicans won’t raise taxes, right?

Democrats will get exactly what they deserve in 2012.  Unfortunately, so will the rest of us for accepting the Democratic Party as the only alternative to the Republican Party.  They are boot lackeys.

Report this

By Thomas Teltser, October 18, 2009 at 7:53 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Call your representatives every day.

Report this

By Fewkes, October 18, 2009 at 5:54 pm Link to this comment

Representative Alan Grayson of Florida echoed the same sentiment on television. 
He said that Olympia Snow was not elected last November, Barack Obama was
elected by a wide majority.  That majority expects the Democrats to fulfill their
campaign promise to give every American adequate and affordable health care,
including the public option.

It’s time for the Democratic Party to stand up for its members.  It is time for
Congress to stand up for their constituents, not the health insurance companies,
their real constituents, us.

Report this

By Litl Bludot, October 18, 2009 at 5:31 pm Link to this comment

Great article. He did get it. I must apologize to Mr. Sirota.  I haven’t read anyone else who’s laid it out so succinctly.

“So the notion that Snowe’s vote—or any GOP vote—is inherently pivotal to health care reform is a fantasy created by the Beltway media and the Democratic congressional leadership. The former is desperately trying to manufacture headline-grabbing drama; the latter is looking for a Republican excuse to water down the bill and protect corporate interests—all while absolving Democrats of legislative responsibility.”

Report this

By Michael Shaw, October 18, 2009 at 12:21 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Well Howard what exactly is Snowe really offering? She opposes a public option(and single payer),the only aspects that will make health care reform feasible. Her so called reasoning for “supporting” Obama, I believe, is similar to Obama embracing her but for the exact opposite reasons. If the new reform works, at least one republican will have had a hand in it, making it bi-partisan, giving the GOP the unwarranted right to say, well we supported it too!

Report this

By Howard, October 18, 2009 at 7:42 am Link to this comment

Snow has at leat got courage to go against her party. Her party offers nothing to the health debate. Get rid of the insurance companies who are only in it for profit.  They take 60 cents of every dollar spent on health.
  Government is already in charge (as should be) of Medicare, Social Security, and Veterans health Ins.
  All are running better than what is proposed and would be 4 times more expensive.  The insurance companies are only ones hig-fiving each other as they will be making More now.  More than ever.
  Get a public option. Yes, an “option”, that will in time be better for all. Obama proposed it initially but caved into resistance from Republicans. Shameful.

Report this

By doublestandards/glasshouses, October 18, 2009 at 6:34 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Access to quality health care is a real problem in
Maine, the state Snowe represents.  Maine has 10
counties only 3 of which have a lower poverty rate
than the national average which is 13%.  The other
counties range from 13 to 20%.  That is from one in
eight to one in five people living in poverty in 7 of
the state’s 10 counties.  Maine’s quality of life
statistics compare with states in the deep south
while the state’s long coastline continues to be a
vacation mecca for the rich. Over all, Maine ranks
27th in the nation in terms of its poverty rate.  In
contrast, Vermont and New Hampshire, its closest New
England neighbors, have the 4th lowest and the lowest
poverty rates respectively in the nation.  Like
senators and congressmen from the poorest states in
the south which would benefit most from a public
option, Snowe remains opposed to even a weak public
option.  It is testimony to the fact that the poor in
this country have been coerced into not voting in
their own best interest or into not voting at all.

Report this

By Litl Bludot, October 18, 2009 at 4:24 am Link to this comment

Sometimes Sirota seems to get the real corporate squeeze and how its played, and sometimes he is clueless. This leads one to think of motive, but I will leave that for now.

Here’s how it works, for anyone dim enough not to understand corruption.  The Democrats actually WANT to water down the health “reform” bill in order to please their corporate paymasters.  In order to do that without looking like the craven, amoral, spineless corporate hacks that they are, they need at least one Republican to vote for the “reform”. All the “compromises” by the Dems to Snow are really corporate demands already agreed to by the Dems.  They are just using her and “bipartisanship” as the reason for their betrayal of the Democratic base and independents who actually believed that when they voted for Obama they were going to get “change”.  Instead, we got the consolidation of corporate control over our government, and the complete takeover of the treasury by the banks, health care by private insurers, and probably the end of medicare and maybe social security, not to mention increased military presence in our schools (including CIA recruitment).  More secrecy and the codification of torture (this by a constitutional professor-Obama.)

BTW, Obama’s declared wish for nuclear disarmament is really a front for the nuclear power industry to supercede any major move towards renewable energy in the 3rd world, and indeed, everywhere.  Every state is to sign nuclear non proliferation treaties in order to make it safe for nuclear power stations that are not thought of as the first step towards makeing nuclear weapons. This is the real reason for the bullying of Iran.  Obama’s on the Nuclear industry payroll as well.

Report this

By Fraser Tothus, October 17, 2009 at 3:06 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

What better act is there than cutting off their funding?  All the elite cares about is if we pay our bills (their income).  That was what all the financial speculations were about, fantasies about the future value of labor/payments yet to take place.  I look at the huge amounts we spend on the military doing not much defending of the country since 1812, and I see vast resources now spent on keeping the world safe for corp-tocracy. (Seems to me that was what the Civil war as about, too) When I hear the tired argument that there isn’t enough money, I have to laugh.  Only the press and the politicians keep dead-paned faces, but they are shyster salesmen to the man, liars because their salaries and position depend on it.  But there’s always plenty of money - trillions, this round, for the profitable banksters, more trillions to cap and control Mid-East Oil and keep trouble abrew in the region to justify military occupation - except when it might benefit the ones providing it.  Then “We can’t afford it… “Look at the deficits… Social Security is going broke… We can’t afford Health Care.”  What claptrap!  Only when we stop paying our bills do we become powerful enemies of the corporate state, no longer their wage-slaves.  The social contract has been purposefully broken, each one of us set adrift with no benefactor.  We cannot trust those elected, and must cease to ask others to do what we ourselves must organize.  We must bring back unions.  We must contribute money for our own trust funds to our own accounts, and starve the state and Wall Street.  We must stop paying with credit cards and take our money out of the banks.  Why must stop paying federal taxes.  Fearful of arrest by the Sheriff of Nottingham?  That’s called coercion, or terrorism under recent usage. It’s a “protection” racket.  So, like good little wage-slaves, we pay to support the corruption, “criminals” if we don’t, while the priests (as ever, if they wish to stay in favor) implore us to have patience and wait for the great by-and-by. Protest confined to meaningless words, bereft of action.  “Safe” as long as we go along.  We are not the change we seek.  Meanwhile, the corporations themselves, by hiring lawyers to get tax breaks, socialize the costs.  What suckers we are.  We fall for it every time.  Pretty words and wishful fables like Robin Hood.  There are no saviors but ourselves.  If not us, then who?  If not now, then when?

Report this

By Michael Shaw, October 17, 2009 at 12:32 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I agree with Taowalker. Beyond what he said about rebellion(and who in the hell really wants that?) what I see are the politicians looking out for themselves(as always) and for their own futures, not that of the “befuddled” masses. As the author points out, the democrats can push through any health care reform they wish too and stop any filibuster, so why don’t they do this(beyond the aforementioned)?

As for Obama, why he doesn’t do this can only bring to mind the absurd possibility in bringing Snowe on board to make it look like a bi-partisan act in the event of a failure. If they really didn’t want failure, they would start listening to the huddled masses(who want a public option and single payer)and guarantee themselves perpetual political victories as champions of the poor and middle class. Instead they water this down to the point where it will fail, allowing the GOP a foothold to once again take over and finish off what is left of the social programs that still exist.

Report this

By TAO Walker, October 17, 2009 at 12:15 pm Link to this comment

It could just be that those who’ve been allowed a peek at the ‘script’ are acutely aware there isn’t enough ‘time’ left for any of this to matter anyhow.  Of course the assigned ‘role ’ of “....your huddled masses” is to be the “true believers” who go over the cliff slap-happily expecting to sprout wings and fly.  Meantime, those in-the-know will’ve long since been airlifted to the illusory safety of gated compounds in undisclosed locations.

There’s absolutely nothing to any of this 24/7 media madness but going-through-the-motions, lest some among the intended sacrificees manage to cling to some of the ‘escape’ pods and prevent a few of the ‘chosen’ from getting away….ala those scenes from america’s flight from Viet Nam.  There’s only cold comfort in ‘revenge,’ anyway, and damned little of that, as someone noted awhile ago.

The sooner the billions of “left-behinds” figure out they’re redundant to the ‘future’ requirements of the “civilization” CONtraption, the sooner they can quit looking “up” for salvation, and get together where they actually live and breathe to help each other.

There is no “other” Way open to our tame Sisters and Brothers.

HOkaHey!

Report this

By fredmoz, October 17, 2009 at 10:40 am Link to this comment

David wrote”...So the notion that Snowe’s vote—or any GOP vote—is inherently pivotal to health care reform is a fantasy created by the Beltway media and the Democratic congressional leadership.” How could you David leave out the big enchilada President O????
May be after reading Micheal Moore “pussy whipped” second letter of penance you decided to follow. Could not believe my eyes.

Report this

By Michael Shaw, October 17, 2009 at 9:47 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Fifty Gigs, Obama does not need any republican support to pass a viable universal health care plan with a public option. Roosevelt pushed his plans through with far less support. He did it by going directly to the American people. In this case the American people, who overwhelmingly want a single payer plan, have been shut out of the conversation. Without a public option there is no viable plan. Why all the pussyfooting over one vote in the senate, a vote in fact that will never support a public option? Also if this health care system is in such havoc, why doesn’t he declare a national emergency and use his unitary executive powers to implement it? This is a national emergency! Really all he needs to do is use his bully pulpit to tell the bluedogs to either support the plan or lose Democratic Party support. Instead he is cow-towing to one republican who in fact represents the best interests of the insurance corporations.

Report this

By KDelphi, October 17, 2009 at 9:45 am Link to this comment

Its called selling out, david. both parties do it, as you have noted. If the Senate Finance Comm is “the bill”—a word to the wise, Obama—dont sign it!

FiftyGigs—if this is the best the Dems can do, who needs “friends”? its a shit bill. If they “pass”
it this way, reform will be put off for decades more and Obama’s domestic “policy” (already in jeopardy of looking samo/samo GOP) will be , not just a failure, but, a total failure.

But, as far as I can see, it will change nothing for anyone I know personally (may raise their private policy rates), so, its you funeral!

Report this

By Janos Gereben, October 17, 2009 at 9:39 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I disagree Sirota’s absolutist view of Sen. Snowe’s vote.

Of course, it’s been hyped to death - like everything is in this crazy country - but I do see important symbolic significance in her vote, and Obama (no fool, he) is making a big deal out of it because it *may* be a small wedge into the Party of No - even if it helps turning just a couple of votes around in the Senate.

Nationally, it’s important for the poor, struggling sane faction of what used the to be the Grand Old Party.

Report this

By FiftyGigs, October 17, 2009 at 9:03 am Link to this comment

“I don’t get it.”

Too hard? Yeah. Let me explain:

“Just this week, the Senate Finance Committee approved a reform proposal that has both Democratic and Republican support.” [Barack Obama, Radio Address, 10/17]

That’s why.

It’s called aggressive politics, and a bare-knuckle brawl would be easier. Obama just engaged the real enemy. Understand? And your response is to… whine about Snowe?? What’s the matter? Did you finish your series of articles on each specific provision of the health care bills and have no other topic this week?

If you don’t “get it” then you don’t want health care reform.

I suppose the President (who we all know is really in the pocket of the industry, like every Democrat) probably wants to keep insurance issues really hush-hush, right? Let’s listen in:

“The history is clear: for decades rising health care costs have unleashed havoc on families, businesses, and the economy.”

Havoc! You do realize he used that word, not because he’s a flowery speaker, but because health care costs really have unleashed havoc, right?

“In fact, the insurance industry is rolling out the big guns and breaking open their massive war chest – to marshal their forces for one last fight to save the status quo. They’re filling the airwaves with deceptive and dishonest ads. They’re flooding Capitol Hill with lobbyists and campaign contributions.  And they’re funding studies designed to mislead the American people.”

All simple truths.

Yeah, yeah, Obama should have won the presidency without taking contributions and without spending any money. I get it. Have Sarah Palin try that and let us know how it works.

Obama just nailed the monster, and he did it on a nationwide address that dwarfs the combined power of conservative talking heads. Is your contribution to this effort really going to be to just whine and tally up daily scores like politics were the equivalent of football rankings?

No wonder you don’t get it.

Report this

By bogi666, October 17, 2009 at 5:58 am Link to this comment

The way the Obushama administration has handled the health care reform issue makes it clear that Obushama wasn’t serious about it being a success. Rather than crafting and introducing legislation Obushama turned it over to Congress virtually ensuring its failure because each committee came up with competing versions subject to influence[bribery] by the health insurance industry through their lobbyists. AS for Snowe being so significant about her unnecessary vote is something so absurd and bizarre it defies explanation except serving as an explanation to scuttle the whole issue.

Report this
LostHills's avatar

By LostHills, October 16, 2009 at 11:48 pm Link to this comment

The Democrats made her the Queen because they are used to following Republican leadership, and don’t have the courage or ability to lead on their own.

Report this

By Jones, October 16, 2009 at 11:22 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Many who commented here need to enlist in the Army or Air Force or Navy on Monday, first thing, don’t wait. Learn to be a real American. 

I served, have you?  Anyone?

Report this

By iRa, October 16, 2009 at 7:19 pm Link to this comment

Hi, usually like your editorials; this time…

I think it might be possible to bring the Republicrats and the Democans together to solve us “little gals/guys” problems, quickly and efficiently—believe there’s this clock ticking…

iRa

Report this

By Fraser Tothus, October 16, 2009 at 5:20 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

That Reagan “landslide” is nonsense.  A tiny fraction of the population voted.  What is also nonsense is the idea that we have two different parties in this country.  As the honorable Gore Vidal put it, “we only have one political party in this country… it’s the business party, and it has two right-wing factions…”  Closer to the reality is that we have two gangster families, whose consigliare occupy offices on Capital Hill, the White House, and all along K Street.  They work together to make sure nothing that might cause a threat to their corporate benefactors domination occurs.  Democrats? Republicans?  You might as well be talking about the Rosellis and the Gambinos.

Report this

By berniem, October 16, 2009 at 5:07 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

With the exception of a precious few Progressives the Dems. are nothing more than Repubs. in pseudo-liberal clothing to maintain the deception that there are indeed 2 parties. I became an independent when Clinton popped-up ‘cause by then I knew there’s no such thing as a Progressive cracker(with all due respect to Carter). This charade of health care reform clearly demonstrates that our aristocracy has no intention of bestowing any benefits on the masses. In reality they are solely devoted to the furtherence of the plutocrats’ & oligarques’ agendaes as this is where the money is. Watching our two parties “slug it out” reminds me of the War of the Roses between the Yorks & Lancasters. No matter who won you were still stuck with a monarchy. Instead of kissing the butt of the dragon lady from Maine we should be rolling out the guillotines and parking them at the entrances to congress. Socialist revolution anyone?

Report this
ThomasG's avatar

By ThomasG, October 16, 2009 at 5:04 pm Link to this comment

David Sirota,

The following is in answer to your question:

Congressman Alan Grayson and PCCC Delivering Petition to Senator Harry Reid

http://www.actblue.com/page/reidaccountable?refcode=f-bcn

The solution is support of Congressman Alan Grayson and his quest as a leader to remove Right-Wing Conservative EXTREMIST toadies and cooperators from leadership positions in the Democratic Party over Congressional Committees and to replace them with Democrats that have a spine and the will to represent the masses of the American population, rather than narrow Corporate interests at the expense of the masses of the American population, and to take the same process to the Senate, so that all of the offending Congressmen and Senators can be identified and eliminated in the Primary Election Process; in this manner, with Congressman Alan Grayson’s leadership, the Democratic Party can be reformed and transformed into a Political Party that is representative of the masses of the Common Population of the United States, rather than a minority population of middle class toadies that are representative of narrow Corporate interests at the expense of the masses of the Common Population of the United States.

Report this

By diamond, October 16, 2009 at 3:49 pm Link to this comment

Why is she queen of America? Because she acted like a decent human being instead of a criminal. These days that’s all it takes.

Report this
PatrickHenry's avatar

By PatrickHenry, October 16, 2009 at 3:20 pm Link to this comment

Maine already has a form of socialized medicine, all children are covered by state insurance till they are 18.  Snowe would look pretty foolish if she didn’t support an all inclusive bill.

If our congresspeople don’t want to pass a national healthcare bill it should be done state by state, like the canadians did provience by provience.

Report this

By Michael Shaw, October 16, 2009 at 1:13 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

This is something we should all get and trust me, the congress and senate have been getting it for decades now. The whole idea behind this facade is to make it look like a bipartisan event so that in the end, when we get screwed(as usual), they will say, “Well we’ve tried!” Well the truth is, this is more bipartisan then we think, IE one and the same or in other words, unison. The congress(and its senate) does not work for us and it hasn’t for decades! Bipartisan colleagues are all in the pockets of the health insurance lobbies and big pharm. More importantly, public officials are guaranteed lucrative lobby positions once they leave office. It is a win-win situation for them, as “We the People,” are yet again being sold down the river. Because of a stupid public, it will guarantee another republican victory in the years to come, the republicans having no care or considerations about what the so called liberal democrats are thinking, they know how to use the bully pulpit to shove every imaginable abomination down their throats and in the end, our throats! The only thing the democrats know, is how to give up power as soon as they get it, then blame the opposition for their capitulations! All to keep the proverbial ball(illusion) that a two party system even exists This is no accident, merely a contrived plan to present the appearance of fair and meaningful democracy.

If the democrats do not give us a viable public option(and I doubt they will) while giving states the option to adopt single payer(no chance in hell!), then there is no reason for the poor and what’s left of the middle class to vote for them. Of course there is especially no reason to vote for republicans. The politicians on both sides of the aisle are all absorbed in corporate campaign finance to get reelected and how to feather their own golden nests once they’re gone. With only a few exceptions, that is their main priority. But the stupid public doesn’t have a clue. If they did there would be tens of millions of us marching on Washington and Wall Street. There would be demands for real reform and real regulation, massive investigations for the massive fraud on Wall Street.

Calling Olympia Snowe a renegade and building her up as the major media have done is just one more link in the process, all of which is owned and manipulated by Wall Street, the health insurance corporations and big pharm. They own major media as much as they own most of our elected reps. The only thing we own is the inability to stand up for our rights, if we even understand what they are! From what I’ve seen so far, as I said previously, they haven’t got a clue!

Report this

By GoyToy, October 16, 2009 at 10:48 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Mr. Sirota, let me help you understand. The reason for this health care charade is simple: Our government does not give a crap about us. Grasp that and you’ll understand why the country as a whole is in such deep doo-doo. OK?

Now, let’s move on to more important stories, such as the one about the boy who was not in the balloon…

Report this
thebeerdoctor's avatar

By thebeerdoctor, October 16, 2009 at 8:24 am Link to this comment

Oh the weather outside is frightful
But the fire is so delightful
And since we’ve no place to go
Let it Snowe! Let it Snowe! Let it Snowe!

Report this

By Cathy, October 16, 2009 at 5:51 am Link to this comment

You don’t even have to read the article, which really says nothing.  Why is Olympia Snowe front and center?  Because of Barack Obama.  She is his symbol of bipartisanship, his way of saying look what I accomplished.  No matter that he’ll sell the American people out to get that one vote.  Yes, I’ve enough articles over the last few months of Barack’s constant contact with Olympia Snowe.  But screw the Progressive Dems—they have to sit down and shut up.  I am absolutely amazed that the Obamanistas, Obamabots, or whatever you want to call them—do not get that this guy is not really into real reform.  I’m wondering if he ever was.  Did he throw single-payer out there in a speech lo those many years ago in 2003 as a calculated move to start courting the progressives on his way to a Presidential win?  It’s a shame so many lives are at stake and the well-being of an entire country.  Otherwise I would be hysterical watching the smoke and mirrors and the constant red herrings of the dog-and-pony show.

Report this

By KISS, October 16, 2009 at 5:41 am Link to this comment

Thanks David for mentioning “reconciliation” as part of the process Harry Reid can and should use to bring ” Single Payer” into the foray.
He is so weak-kneed and this baloney of Bi-Partisan is so phony it would be laughable, if not such a serious component of our health needs.
Why is it that the repugs are so parliamentarian procedure smart and the dimmos so DUM? Remember the dis-embowlment of the constitution? The repugs beat the dimmos with tricks and political manuevers..all legal ‘cept the outcome.

Report this

By dihey, October 16, 2009 at 5:38 am Link to this comment

A snow job.

Report this

By montanawildhack, October 16, 2009 at 3:36 am Link to this comment

Dear Inherit the Wind,

In response to your query, Who gives a rat’s ass about her hair?  “I do!!  It pisses me off.”  I sincerely hope this clarifies things… 

Now can we please cease this inane claptrap about Olympia Snowe’s hair and speak of more important things like the Balloon Boy…  He’s a Hero!!!!!

Report this

By ardee, October 16, 2009 at 3:29 am Link to this comment

If you don’t think the American political scene is one giant mes then reading this ridiculous article should convince you otherwise.

Let us not speak about what a useless outcome will be this “reform”, let us not speak to the continuing deaths in an unwinnable war, certainly we shall not discuss the flushing of trillions down the sewer that will be our children’s future.

No, lets follow the authors lead and speak to nothing of consequence at all…Must have been an approaching deadline with nothing much to say.

Report this

By GeorgeM, October 16, 2009 at 3:17 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Hey—the dems don’t have to give a crap about even keeping their jobs! They have healthcare for LIFE and can run off to cushy, high paying jobs once they get replaced by a repugnican thug who will be able to destroy Medicaid and Medicare in a bipartisan way once the no-public option “reform” turns to sh*t.

Olympia Snowe can go f herself to death, along with most of the rest of congress.

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, October 16, 2009 at 3:14 am Link to this comment

I’ll tell you what really pisses me off——-Olympia Snowe’s hair!!!  This woman is old enough to have gotten laid on VE day and she doesn’t have a gray hair on her head???  I mean her hair is jet black!!! It looks stupid and it really makes me mad…..
***********************************************

Yeah, why isn’t it dyed phony blonde or plastic red like all the other old ladies? And frizzie. Why isn’t it frizzie?

(where’s the irony smiley?  Who GIVES a rat’s @$$ about her hair?)

Report this

By montanawildhack, October 16, 2009 at 3:01 am Link to this comment

Once again as it with So Many of these articles: “Tell me something I don’t know!!!!!”  So it’s all a big goddamn dog and pony show and we’ll all be fucked over when all is said done… Do your worst…. 

I’ll tell you what really pisses me off——-Olympia Snowe’s hair!!!  This woman is old enough to have gotten laid on VE day and she doesn’t have a gray hair on her head???  I mean her hair is jet black!!! It looks stupid and it really makes me mad…..

Report this

By C.Curtis.Dillon, October 16, 2009 at 1:58 am Link to this comment

Can you imagine the Demo consternation over this problem?  They are obligated to do the bidding of their employers but know, without any doubt, that the bill they must produce will destroy not only their majority but the future of the president.  Bit the hand that feeds you or the people who trusted you to be on their side.  Watching Reed and others navigate this maze is interesting but sad.  Look what Clinton did to this party!  He will go down as the killer of the Dems, just like Reagan gets the blame for the GOP.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.