|
|
May 21, 2013
|
|
A 9/11 Debt Still UnpaidPosted on Sep 9, 2009By Marie Cocco The first “shift” that John Feal, a supervisor for a demolition contractor, worked at the smoldering labyrinth of fallen buildings at Ground Zero lasted 43 hours. Over the next few days—until Sept. 17, 2001—the young, athletic worker from Long Island labored amid the molten metal and shattered glass and concrete remains of skyscrapers that had collapsed after terrorists rammed two airliners into the World Trade Center. Feal’s work would end when an 8,000-pound steel beam landed on his left foot, cutting it in half. The injury, which required 30 surgeries over five years, made Feal one of the thousands of heroes of 9/11 who have been treated in a manner that is anything but heroic. Disgraceful is a more fitting word. Like thousands of others who descended on lower Manhattan after the terrorist attack, Feal did not work for New York City as a cop or a firefighter, and didn’t have the health insurance, disability and pension safety nets those jobs provide. As a construction worker whose labor was subcontracted to three different companies, his claim for workers’ compensation was repeatedly stymied. “Nobody wanted to claim that I got hurt on their watch,” he says. Unable to work, he lost his health insurance, sold off his cars and even his furniture to pay medical bills. Twice he went to court to save his house from foreclosure; his credit score plummeted. “The financial burden that was placed upon me was staggering,” Feal says. “I lost almost everything.” His claim for Social Security disability benefits was at last approved in 2004 and Feal began a slow climb back. He started a foundation to help other 9/11 rescue and recovery workers who are sick and unable to work, yet trapped in a legal maze that often denies them even meager disability benefits—or finally grants benefits so long after they’ve stopped working that financial crises consume them. Advertisement Yet for eight years, even as tens of thousands have come to its hospitals and clinics with illnesses related to their exposure to the toxic concoction of burning jet fuel, asbestos and other environmental hazards borne in the dust that settled over homes, storefronts and offices in lower Manhattan, New York has been left to cope mostly on its own. Limited federal funding has paid for health screening, and more than 10,500 people have received federally funded treatment for physical health problems, according to a report by a panel on World Trade Center health problems appointed by Mayor Michael Bloomberg. But that is a small part of the story. There are 71,000 who have come forward to have their health monitored. After reviewing more than 100 studies that have been completed on the health issues arising from the attack, the Bloomberg panel concluded that post-traumatic stress disorder is “highly prevalent” among rescue and recovery workers. So are asthma and other forms of serious respiratory disease. Those who had no protective gear—neighborhood residents; construction, telecommunications workers and others who labored at the site for weeks; commuters; volunteers—are at greater risk. Then there is the unknown: Cancers, some of them rare, have begun to be diagnosed. The health panel cautions that “late-emerging effects are not expected to be clearly evident for at least a decade after exposure.” For years, New York lawmakers have sought legislation to require the federal government to monitor and treat those who responded to the World Trade Center disaster, as well as residents who lived near the site. For the most part, lawmakers from outside of the region believe this isn’t their problem. Yet Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., one of the measure’s sponsors, notes that at least 10,000 people went to New York from around the country to help after the attacks. “These are your constituents,” she pleaded in a recent memo. So the toll from 9/11 climbs. Its victims suffer from debilitating diseases, struggle against financial ruin, and confront early death. The most meaningful—and imperative—way to mark this anniversary is for Congress to finally pass the 9/11 Health and Compensation Act. Anything less is political theater, and a tired act at that. Marie Cocco’s e-mail address is mariecocco(at)washpost.com. © 2009, Washington Post Writers Group Previous item: Grateful to Have a Job, and Bone-Tired Next item: A Speech Even Insurance Companies Could Love New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By Truth.Will.Win, September 13, 2009 at 2:15 am Link to this comment
I am constantly astonished at how well the establishment manages the 911 cover up. Those among us who would request that simply the events of 911 be reopened for investigation simply get called kooks, pinheads, nutters etc etc.
Come on America, isn’t it time that you started to answer the questions raised by so called conspiracy theorists rather than resorting to puerile name calling?
Charlie Sheen has taken a courageous step and raised twenty questions he is calling upon the President to answer, or if he cannot answer, then launch a new investigation to find the answers.
See it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZyKR2-A0KPU
The twenty questions: http://www.prisonplanet.com/twenty-minutes-with-the-president.html
And if you are one to believe that raising these questions is hurtful and being cruel to the victims families, the ongoing silence form the government is the real source of that pain. Charlie Sheen is speaking out on behalf of those families who have being simply asking for the truth these past eight years:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzC3QI8JenU
Listen to victim father Robert McIrvine express his pain on Italian television (he can’t do this on American television):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hMTrawIUU0
All we want is the truth.
Report thisBy Jean Gerard, September 12, 2009 at 9:27 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
When parents can’t even let their kids listen to an innocuous speech by the President and furors of hate and resentment are deliberately promoted to prevent national public health care because it’s “socialistic” it’s time to do something constructive to improve our two sources of information—media and schools. “Improve” means believe in your children’s future, and work any and every way, non-violently, to demand accuracy in reporting whether on TV, radio or in print, so the general level of knowledge will rise to eliminate hysteria and fanaticism. Don’t give up when you find out it’s harder than you thought. Work with others at the neighborhood level to help and support teachers and see that kids get the experience of solving problems and discussing different points of view. That’s for starters—enough to keep all of us busy. Truth is, we know what to do, but we choose not to do it. Instead we just make excuses and criticize others for not doing it. That’s not democracy, frankly. It’s pull-the-blanket-over-your-headism. It’s neglect.
Report thisBy Tony Wicher, September 11, 2009 at 9:00 pm Link to this comment
The most meaningful thing that could be done for the 9-11 victims and first responders is to bring the true perpetrators of 9-11 to justice: George W. Bush,
Report thisGeorge H.W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and the rest of 9-11 gang. When these traitors are tried in open court and hanged Nuremburg-style like the Nazis they are, then, and only then, will the trauma of 9-11 be healed.
By Craig R. Lane, September 11, 2009 at 1:48 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Marie Cocco promised me some 6-7 years ago that she would look into the well known profiteering that occurred down on Wall Street during the events of 9/11. Put-options placed were UP by some 600% from normal as someone made bets on Wall Street that the airline stocks for United, American would tumble. These put-options on the airlines made someone rich. That person is known by the FSC as you cannot place put OR call options anonymously. Last I heard they were waiting for someone to come claim the over 1 million dollars in profit generated. So much for actual truth when there is a soap box to be stood upon. Also, to the “person” above who doesn’t think “as (he or she) pointed out elsewhere, it seems that 9/11 hasn’t been very effective as a political tool regardless of who did it.” I mean, could you be MORE clueless? How about two illegal wars. The patriot act, the shit-canning of FISA and Habeaus Corpus, what world do you live on???? I am not a conspiracy theorist I am a reality theorist. There are alot of questions remaining after 9/11 that people are afraid to ask. Right Marie????????????
Report thisBy Anarcissie, September 10, 2009 at 3:53 pm Link to this comment
As with most good conspiracy theories, the 9/11 theories require an organization so powerful and effective that no investigation by an ordinary reporter, politician or bureaucrat could make any headway against it. Therefore, the subject quickly becomes a bore—unless you can ring in the Knights Templar, the Saturnian ant men, or Brad Pitt.
Anyway, as I pointed out elsewhere, it seems that 9/11 hasn’t been very effective as a political tool regardless of who did it. So all that organizational talent was wasted.
I am not surprised a poppy outfit like Huffpo has banned 9/11-style conspiracism. They’ve got ads to sell, and they’ve got to take care not to bore off their audience. If you’re going to persist you’re going to need some celebrities.
Report thisBy Lauren Unruh, September 10, 2009 at 1:04 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Dear Marie,
You are a reporter, why don’t you investigate what they are covering up about
9/11?
What do you think of Huffington Post policy of banning 9/11 ‘truthers’? HuffPost is
very happy to print 9/11 liars, libelers and misinformers, but they refuse to publish
any truth. What do you think of that policy, Marie? Do you support it?
And what about depleted uranium? Have you seen the reports on the birth defects
and cancer it causes?
How about it’s wind dispersal patterns?
Just asking. You know, for humanitarian purposes. Sincerely,
Rev Lauren Unruh
PS You can check for my posts on the subject in AlterNet for more information. I
Report thispost in the comments under Sister Lauren.
By Anarcissie, September 10, 2009 at 11:04 am Link to this comment
The point of memorializing atrocities is usually to provide a pretext and an atmosphere for further atrocities. This is how 9/11 was used and how it continues to be used, for example in Ms. Cocco’s article furthering the performance of atrocities in Afghanistan. Helping the injured seems to be beside the point. In spite of all the talk, very little help was offered to victims of 9/11 unless they belonged to influential organizations (like big corporations) or had connections.
Report this