![]() |
![]() |
||
|
New Light on Copenhagen Climate TalksPosted on Sep 1, 2009By Amy Goodman On Sept. 1, the European Union stopped manufacturing and importing incandescent light bulbs. Europeans will now turn to the much more efficient compact fluorescent, halogen and LED (light-emitting diode) bulbs. Incandescents, critics argue, waste up to 95 percent of energy as heat, using only 5 percent for light. The EU hopes to save the equivalent of 11 million households’ energy usage through the year 2020, worth $7.33 billion per year to the European economy. The ban precedes the December 2009 Copenhagen climate conference, held by the United Nations to update the 1997 Kyoto Protocol. Greenhouse-gas emissions now occur faster than ever. Copenhagen will be critical to the success or failure of establishing a practical, binding global plan of action before human-caused climate change reaches the point of no return, creating a cascade of catastrophes. Eventually, global warming will become irreversible if action is not taken. Greenhouse-gas concentrations in the atmosphere are measured in “parts per million” (PPM). Environmentalist Bill McKibben says that a sustainable level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is 350 PPM. He has named his organization 350.org to reinforce the point. We are currently at 387 PPM and climbing. McKibben and 350.org are calling for a global day of action, on Oct. 24, to pressure governments before the Copenhagen summit. A new generation of environmental activists is already in motion. This week, two young people were arrested in West Virginia for halting a Massey Energy Co. mountaintop coal-mining operation with a weeklong “tree sit,” and six people in London were arrested at the Royal Bank of Scotland headquarters for protesting the bank’s investment in fossil fuels. They glued themselves together and to the floor of the bank to hamper their removal, leading Reuters to headline its story “Protesters stick together in UK bank demonstration.” The road to Copenhagen also is paved with gold: money being spent by the wealthy oil, gas and coal industries to derail or weaken any outcome. The American Petroleum Institute (API) has launched an “AstroTurf” (not to be confused with grass roots) campaign in the U.S., paying for and organizing rallies, largely attended by oil, gas and coal company employees, under the banner of “Energy Citizens.” Employees are bused in to the staged rallies with signs proclaiming “I’ll pass on $4 gas” and “Congress, don’t take away my job!” Similarities to the organized mobs at health care reform town-hall-style meetings are not merely coincidental; former Republican House Majority Leader Dick Armey’s group FreedomWorks, funded by, among others, oil and pharmaceutical corporations, is listed as a consultant to each industry campaign. Advertisement Genuine citizen action, in the U.S. and beyond, will be critical to counter industry influence over the Copenhagen talks. There is a light at the end of the climate tunnel—it just isn’t incandescent. Amy Goodman is the host of “Democracy Now!,” a daily international TV/radio news hour airing on more than 750 stations in North America. She is the co-author of “Standing Up to the Madness: Ordinary Heroes in Extraordinary Times,” recently released in paperback. © 2009 Amy Goodman Previous item: Why We Must Stay in Afghanistan Next item: Will Japan's New Leader Maintain His Country's Fealty to Washington? Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By Katherine Philipson, September 18 at 4:51 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Attend one of 1500 global climate wake-up calls on Monday September 21st!!
http://www.avaaz.org/en/tcktcktck_map/?cl=324328062&v=3992
Report thisBy Night-Gaunt, September 2 at 4:01 pm #
350 ppm was the extreme limit calculated and we are passed 375 ppm and climbing! So going back to 350 is too high. A carbon tax used to fuel the conversion to carbonless technology is one way to do it. Another is to eat less meat, use other animals than cows to eat also that do not ruminate and produce methane would also help. Use non-hydrocarbon tech and that would include solar, geo-thermal, deep ocean convection and wave power to name a few. Hybrids are a good bridge but the plug in variety is the best. And get the power from solar* and wind would also do.
We would need to reshape the world and our ways of doing things and bring the rest of the world to the same level of green technology and enough food. Until then it will be a haphazard mess as always.
*Solar is the one tech that is personal and also large scale. Where you don’t have solar cells you can have reflectors to send the sun light back into space will help too.
Report thisBy arch_one, September 2 at 2:50 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
To join the 350 International Day of Action on October
Report this24th go to 350.org—there you can find or start an
event near you. So far there are nearly 1400 actions in
99 countries!
By Ellen Newton Duell, September 2 at 2:19 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
It’s imperative that we do all we can to reduce greenhouse gases and slow down climate change. We can carpool, use appropriate lightbulbs (as little as possible) and do the many things to reduce consumption of nonrenewable fuels which are possible to us—layer our clothing to keep warm—the willingness is important! Our legacy to our grandchildren must be a sustainable earth to live on, and the knowledge to keep it that way.
Report thisBy stcfarms, September 2 at 10:18 am #
Trusting government or industry with our lives is industrial grade stupid. 350
Report thisppm is not a sustainable level of atmospheric carbon, the number is closer to
270 ppm. We can lower the carbon level without involving the criminals that
hid the problem for 50 years. I submitted my plan of manmade islands for
growing vegetation to the Bush puppet Oppenheimer, he wrote back that it
would work but was too expensive to build. I submitted my plan to the Obama
puppet Chu with no response at all. After the Oppenheimer comment I looked
in to a cheaper method of removing carbon and hit upon the idea of building
the islands in an ever expanding ring that would create a Sargasso sea type
environment inside the ring. Since seaweed has little value other than
removing carbon from the atmosphere and providing refuge for marine life the
talking heads in Washington will not even look at the plan. If you are really
concerned about our future then I suggest building an island and start
removing the carbon on your own, that is what I am doing. If you want
something done right, do it yourself.
By beeline, September 2 at 6:20 am #
The effects of climate change can already be felt in some places on the planet. Bangladesh flooding is becoming more severe and extreme weather occurs more frequently.
Report thisBy ChaoticGood, September 2 at 4:17 am #
I highly suggest that you view this video on FORA.TV
It is scary to put it mildly.
http://fora.tv/2009/08/18/A_REALLY_Inconvenient_Truth_Dan_Miller
Report thisBy Night-Gaunt, September 1 at 11:32 pm #
One of many ways we can cut back without sweltering in the dark. We must adjust our lifestyles not just here but all over the planet or we won’t be doing very well just 50 years from now. If we don’t act now it could be worse in the future for those just born and yet to be born.
Report this