|
|||
|
Why We Must Stay in AfghanistanPosted on Aug 31, 2009By Marie Cocco Editor’s note: For an alternative point of view, read this, this or this. We will never forget, say the bumper stickers, which often bear the image of the smoking Twin Towers superimposed across the red and white stripes of the flag. But we have forgotten. Or at least we have forgotten that the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, demanded that we go to war in Afghanistan. This war flares anew, and every day seems to reach some new marker—the most deaths in any year for American and international forces, a tally of U.S. casualties for August that makes it the deadliest month. Public weariness deepens. CNN recently found a precipitous drop in support for the war effort. The Washington Post uncovered a more troubling sentiment: A slim majority now says the Afghanistan War isn’t worth fighting. This is alarming, and inexplicable. Advertisement I have often been repulsed by the politicization of 9/11, and by any effort by either political party to gain advantage from its commemoration. Maybe now, though, we need this reminder because too many forget. They forget why we are in Afghanistan—because it was there in a faraway land of poverty, tribal animosities and historic hostility toward outsiders that a sophisticated terrorist network was allowed to take root, to flourish and plot the spectacular attack. Afghanistan today is once again such a caldron. That George W. Bush botched the effort there is tragic. The then-president duped the nation into believing that an invasion of Iraq was necessary to the fight against terrorism, and devoted far more resources to war there than we expended in the crucial war in Afghanistan—a historic blunder. But it is no excuse for making another calamitous mistake now. The flagging public support for the Afghanistan effort, Georgetown University terrorism expert Bruce Hoffman says, is a consequence of the Iraq distraction and public fatigue with that war. “Combine that with the economic downturn, the fact that there hasn’t been a serious attack since 9/11, and a sense of complacency sets in—which to me vitiates the lessons of 9/11,” he said in an interview. President Barack Obama pledged during his campaign to redirect American resources from Iraq to the effort to wrest Afghanistan from the Taliban’s tightening hold and from the grip of the poverty, corruption and regional lawlessness that enabled al-Qaida to make the country a haven. To abandon Obama’s nascent strategy there before seeing if it can work is folly. And it would be a betrayal. The activist, liberal Democrats who powered Obama to the Democratic presidential nomination last year based on his opposition to the Iraq war are the ones who are souring most quickly on Afghanistan, polls show. In May, an early indicator of liberal discontent emerged when the House voted on a war spending measure that 60 members—most of them liberal Democrats—opposed. “I don’t think the president can assume that he is going to have the support of the American people in Afghanistan,” says Lee Hamilton, president of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and a former member of Congress from Indiana. The dissent in the House, Hamilton says, is a “clear danger signal.” Obama has been hearing much grousing—some of it from me—from core supporters who are upset at the course of health care legislation, his detainee policy and other issues. These troubles fade when seen in the context of a failure in Afghanistan and a more problematic Pakistan that could emerge from a precipitous American withdrawal. “You can make the argument that we’re in way over our heads, that we’re in a quixotic quest—except that there is still al-Qaida,” Hoffman says. “If we don’t succeed—and success for me is stabilizing Afghanistan and fixing Pakistan—we’re looking at another 9/11.” New and Improved CommentsWe are launching a major overhaul of our comments section. In addition to more robust spam filtering and moderation, new features include the ability to rate other comments, sort how they are displayed and respond directly via e-mail or in a thread. Unfortunately, commenters will lose their existing Truthdig identities. It's a pain, we know, but on the plus side you will now be able to log in with a plethora of options, including Google, Twitter, Facebook and Disqus accounts. Before launching this system we spent months in discussion with our top commenters. We listened to the feedback and we hope you like what we've come up with. Please direct any problems or concerns to us via our contact page. |
By Gmonst, September 1, 2009 at 9:55 am Link to this comment
This article is troubling to me. As I see it, beneath the outward goal of a “stable Afghanistan” lies the military complex’s truer motivations which are to control the immensely valuable strategic position which is Afghanistan. They would love to have a permanent bases right there. It would complete the strategic positioning of bases in Iraq, giving the US military good positioning from a global power point-of-view. There is also I think an egotistical desire to be the first to conquer and tame Afghanistan. They are so blinded by illusions of American excellence that they don’t see the quagmire they are walking into. Thinking of a line from Apocalypse Now, the Taliban have only two ways home, victory or death. They will not give up, and in the end will win unless it becomes a fight to the death for the US.
It won’t become a fight to the death for America because it isn’t really about survival of us or our way of life. Despite what Marie makes out, this isn’t really that important from a strategy of preventing terrorism. I think terrorism is best prevented by international cooperation, good intelligence gathering and police-work. Terrorists only need a room to plan an attack not a country. An attack could be planned from anywhere. None of the 911 attackers came from Afghanistan. If one foreign country could host them then another could. We can’t conceivably hope to stabilize every unstable country. We just have to live with a certain amount of threat, like we do with every other danger. Safety is an illusion anyway.
Report thisBy handle, September 1, 2009 at 9:33 am Link to this comment
No, Marie, terrorism did not “demand that we go to war in Afghanistan.” This is the same sort of excuse pro-war forces have always used. The truth is, we decided to make war. Alternatives were available.
If eight years of failure have not been enough to persuade you of the folly of this war, I don’t know what would be. One thing I do know, no more Afghans should die just because some people in the United States are “scared” of another 9/11.
91% supported the war on October 7, 2001, the day of the invasion. Now some people have been able to change their minds, based on their observation and experience. It will be too bad for President Obama, and the rest of us, if he can’t draw the necessary conclusion.
U.S. out of Afghanistan!
End the Occupation Now!
Report thisBy glider, September 1, 2009 at 9:11 am Link to this comment
Marie, that is some sorry assed “reporting/analysis”.
So we need to occupy all islamic countries so some discontents (who exist because we are there in the first place) can’t sit in a tent and plot attacks. What a great strategy! That will justify any war your little heart desires.
Al Qaeda reading this sort of garbage can rest assured that there 911 attack was much more successful than the 3000 americans killed and the destruction of the twin towers. The have managed to drain far more resources and create much more damage due to our crazy self destructive response. Bin Laden himself said so much. Seems to me they need only pull an attack off once a decade and we will do the rest ourselves.
Report thisBy maryw, September 1, 2009 at 8:56 am Link to this comment
I am, and always have been, an Obama supporter, but the US presence in Afghanistan is something that I have trouble supporting. The history of the country, the history of countless other nations before the US trying to conquer and develop Afghanistan country—this history should show the US that we will not succeed in “defeating the terrorists”. We cannot build a nation. We cannot bring democracy to Afghanistan. Democracy is not a fair election—it is much, much more than that and it starts with the people of the nation. US should get out NOW!
Report thisBy Stenotrophomonas, September 1, 2009 at 8:47 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Cocco needs to read George Will’s column:
Report thisTime to Get Out of Afghanistan
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/31/AR2009083102912.html
By Tex Shelters, September 1, 2009 at 8:32 am Link to this comment
Like most supporters of this military incursion in a “far away land”, M Cocco demonstrates no compelling reason to stay in Afghanistan. None. Supporting the President on his policy, when he is wrong? Why, what is the purpose, what is there to win, how will we know when we have won, and how many Americans and Afghans have to die before we know it.
We need to leave now, to save money (hundreds of billions), lives (thousands of Americans and Afghans), health care (which will be more affordable after we leave), Obama’s presidency (he’s going down if he stays) and our worldwide reputation. But I guess for the other, those reasons aren’t good enough to leave.
Challenge to the author: give me ONE reason to stay, a real reason. An actual goal that can be achieved. If you are worried about Afghan women, grant any woman who want it asylum in the US, and call it a day.
Peace,
Report thisTex Shelters
By tecate, September 1, 2009 at 8:29 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
so what’s the end game? when’s it finished? what’s to stop new ‘networks’ from replacing the one’s which we’ve vanquished?
it’s not a sense of complacency. it is a certain level of rational thought.
Report thisBy Old Dude, September 1, 2009 at 8:21 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Sometimes the Truth breaks through. This brave Afghanistan woman is giving us
The truth. Our policy makers should listen carefully. I urge everyone to find out more.
From PBS-NOW interview with Malalai Joya
NOW: What would you like Americans to know about your country?
I want them to know that Afghan people have been victims of the U.S. government’s wrong policies in the past three decades following the Cold War. They should know that Afghanistan is not “liberated” at all as trumpeted by the Western media. They should know that their government is playing a chess game with our country and is not interested in its stability. They should know that worse enemies of the Afghan people, those who brought Osama Bin Laden to Afghanistan and slaughtered our people and committed unbelievable crimes against its unfortunate women, are now in power and backed by the U.S. government. They should know that Afghan people are facing a 9/11 everyday. They should know that under the U.S. occupation, Afghanistan has become the world’s number one opium producer and a large part of it is smuggled to the U.S. Finally they should know that, like all human beings Afghan people love democracy and freedom and dream of a prosperous life. While we hate the war-mongering and criminal-fostering policies of the U.S. government, we feel, acknowledge and thank the sympathies and support of the U.S. people and learn from their humanism and dedication.
Old Dude
Report thisBy Anarcissie, September 1, 2009 at 8:13 am Link to this comment
Evidently the proprietors feel that the pore little old neo-cons can’t get a hearing anywhere else.
Report thisBy Ivan hentschel, September 1, 2009 at 7:38 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
This was a joke, right? Marie dropped some acid,got to laughing and wondered if anyone was reading? Somebody must be kidding.
Report thisBy thebeerdoctor, September 1, 2009 at 7:14 am Link to this comment
Don’t you just love the war mongering drivel? Some so-called progressives are more concerned if Obama kills a fly in the Oval Office. Never a word about his “right war” global terrorist strategy against the impoverished people of Afghanistan.
Report thisIf you actually buy into the accepted NINE ONE ONE scenario, that “plot” that Ms. Coco (Chanel?) speaks of, was not even hatched in Afghanistan, but in Milan Italy, back in 1998. But as far as National Security fairy tales are concerned, that version is found in the apocrypha section of their “war on terror” bible.
And now we have America’s Number One buppie, lying to the citizens that when it comes to Af-Pak war, we have no choice but to fight.
Obama might have won the election, but when it comes to war mongering, he is the biggest loser of them all.
By herewegoagain, September 1, 2009 at 7:10 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Martha writes: “IMHO, there should be a vote of the Afghans as to whether or not the United States is needed in their country”
If recent news headlines about Afghan women staying away from the voter polls in droves is any indication, we would not get a representative sample of votes.
Report thisBy Paul_GA, September 1, 2009 at 7:09 am Link to this comment
I say, no! No! US out of Afghanistan—swiftly! Or else this country will suffer the Soviet Union’s fate, if not worse ... a LOT worse.
Report thisBy MarthaA, September 1, 2009 at 7:00 am Link to this comment
IMHO, there should be a vote of the Afghans as to whether or not the United States is needed in their country, and if the majority of the Afghanistan people want the United States OUT, the United States should leave, after all, it WAS NOT any of the Afghanistan people that attacked the United States or the people of Pakistan, or Iraq. Saudia Arabia was the prime nation of the attackers; very nearly all the attackers were Saudi Arabian, so Marie Cocco’s dog won’t hunt.
Report thisBy ender, September 1, 2009 at 6:46 am Link to this comment
If we really want to get the Taliban out of Afghanistan, we should be more like them. They give direct aid to the Afghani people, not to corrupt warlords. We blow them the hell up, bomb their weddings, and arrest them at the word of some corrupt ‘ally’ then hold them while ignoring all international law on the treatment of prisoners.
Afghanistan has only two resources. Poppy plants, and access to oil that can currently only get to the world market through Russian control.
Report thisIf we started works project run by mideasterners and hired Afghanis instead of Haliburton, we would start to win the war of hearts and minds, the only way this war can be won.
By Louis Proyect, September 1, 2009 at 5:30 am Link to this comment
What is Marie Cuckoo’s warmongering doing on a website devoted to peace?
Report thisBy herewegoagain, September 1, 2009 at 5:29 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I bet some of the same people who say we should leave Afghanistan – and the children and women there who are brutalized every day by either the Taliban or their own husbands, brothers, and fathers – probably support us establishing a military presence in Darfur to help the women and children there.
What is the difference? I am honestly curious.
That being said, I realize we have spent years now in Afghanistan, and there’s no question that the situation for women there is really bad again. I just read that women stayed away in droves from the latest elections, and of course, we’ve all heard about the Draconian law that just passed that would allow men to force their wives to have sex with them.
Maybe a military presence isn’t the answer, or we need to change our strategy to something more diplomatic and uplifting – I don’t know. But I feel it’s terrible to just abandon these women to such a despairing situation.
Report thisBy hallodane, September 1, 2009 at 5:25 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Truthdig, this is a new low even for you. Disgraceful that you would even publish such crap.
Stalin: How do you handle dissent? You run it yourselves.
Hello Truthdig gatekeepers, government pied pipers, trash whores, lying filth, fifth columnist swine.
I dont’ expect you to publish this, it’s meant for you.
Report thisBy MarthaA, September 1, 2009 at 5:21 am Link to this comment
The history of the world is that nations subdue other nations and export the resources of the subdued nations back to their own nation without the subdued nation receiving benefit from their own nation’s resources; this was true before Europeans came to America; this was true after Europeans came to America; and this is true for America and the rest of the world at the present time.
If America, the United States, is going to stay in Afghanistan or any other nation in pursuit of that nation’s resources, the subdued nation must share EQUITABLY in their own resources, rather than as has been done through out the history of the world.
Report thisBy dihey, September 1, 2009 at 5:16 am Link to this comment
MC’s “terrorist network” learned and trained here in our country. If I follow the warped justification of Marie Cocco we should have been under martial law and occupied by our own army since 9/11.
Report thisBy aaron, September 1, 2009 at 5:03 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
the attacks by bin laden were about our occupation of the arabian pennisula.
their who recruitment technique is about how we are christian crusaders who will occupy their lands and kill their people. they want to be left alone, however we never will because of oil.
also the concept that we can suppress an enemy by becoming exactly what they have said we were since the 1980’s only furthers their recruitment, and increases the dangers. the taliban grows everyday because we push them into the tribal pashtun region. the more we push, the more correct they appear. the more correct the taliban appears, the more others worry about their own land.
war is not the answer.
Report thisBy Anarcissie, September 1, 2009 at 4:18 am Link to this comment
The Washington Post is a neo-con outfit; here’s another bit of evidence.
Report thisBy Jaded Prole, September 1, 2009 at 3:45 am Link to this comment
The Taliban, unpleasant as the are, did not attack us. The terrorist cells that took root there were planted and funded by our own CIA. The Taliban offered to turn Bin Laden over to us on more than one occasion. The Bush regime informed Germany that we would invade Afghanistan in August of 2004, the month before the WTC attack. Our war in Afghanistan was about securing and creating a compliant puppet state so we could build an oil pipeline. It is a criminally insane idea that keeps killing. What we’ve created so far is a torture state and kill zone with the potential to destabilize Pakistan and create a nuclear conflagration in the region.
Report thisBy wanked, September 1, 2009 at 3:43 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I found this piece bewildering. What is our goal in Afghanistan Marie? To kill 50 civilians for every infidel we kill or capture. Get real. The taliban exists not only in Afghanistan, but Pakistan and elsewhere. The best way to fight terrorism is to stop invading countries and killing their civilian population. Also, Mr obama should restore the rule of law in this country. Hold bush and cheney responsible for torture and illegal wars. THAT would be a sound way to fight terrorism. Reduce the military empire.
Report thisBy Jaded Prole, September 1, 2009 at 3:42 am Link to this comment
The Taliban, unpleasant as the are, did not attack us. The terrorist calls that dells that root root there were planted and funded by our own CIA. The Taliban offered to turn Bin Laden over to us on more than one occasion. The Bush regime informed Germany that we would invade Afghanistan in August of 2004, the month <u>before the WTC attack</u>. Our war in Afghanistan was about securing and creating a compliant puppet state so we could build an oil pipeline. It is a criminally insane idea that keeps killing. What we’ve created so far is a torture state and kill zone with the potential to destabilize Pakistan and create a nuclear conflagration in the region.
Report thisBy photoshock, September 1, 2009 at 3:31 am Link to this comment
The problem as I see it is this, too many empires have tried to conquer the land of Afghanistan and failed! Not just failed but failed miserably in thousands of different ways.
Report thisAmerica, is no different. The power structure in our country, the Congressional-Military-Industrial Complex,
thinks that by winning a war, they can prove their worth to the world and that the world will acquiesce to the demands of this ever-growing and earth-gouging group. We, the people, cannot and should not allow this to happen. We are the government of this nation, not the Congressional-Military-Industrial cabal that seeks to turn this country into a neo-fascist, military dictatorship with total control
over the lives of the people of this country.
I thought much better of Marie Cocco, now I see the real person come out, an acquiescing, propagandist for the elite of our country. What in the world was TD, thinking by allowing this drivel to be put up on their website? I can think of only one thing, freedom of the press, and freedom of thought. But are we condemned to a purgatory of articles such as this? Can we the people regain the control of our government that was instituted by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights? Hopefully yes! But if we continue down the same path as the imperialists before us we are doomed to the same destruction as they. We cannot and should not allow this to happen.
What is needed now is a people’s revolution, a soft glove, non-violent takeover of this countries power structure.
We can no longer sit on the fence, by the wayside looking for someone else to do the work of changing our system back to what it should be. We are responsible and can change things, if and only if, all people, gather together to take on the power-elite and bring the lawbreakers of the last and the current administration to justice.
By coloradokarl, September 1, 2009 at 3:22 am Link to this comment
When I first herd the planes were hijacked with “box cutters” I smelled a rat. What kind of people would cower like sheep in the face of such a small and powerless threat? Something big is about to happen, folks. Got gas for your generator? got food? A gun?....
Report thisBy Allan Krueger, September 1, 2009 at 2:32 am Link to this comment
Bush painted us into a corner when he invaded Afghanistan! Go to the library and read some history, will you Marie?
Report thisBy ChaoticGood, September 1, 2009 at 2:20 am Link to this comment
Afganistan is the place where empires go to die. Everyone knows that you cannot win there, so why continue this farce.
Report thisAll that is going on is that the Democrats must put on the Warface so they won’t be called wimps by the barbarian Republicans.
So again our brave troops have to die, to prove that Americans are “tough”. The bloodthirsty madness of the Republicans or the fear of wimpishness by the Democrats. Either way our children are dying for nothing.
By Marc Schlee, September 1, 2009 at 2:00 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
FREE AMERICA
WHEN TWO-BIT PROPAGANDISTS LIKE MARIE COCCO LIE TO YOU, DON’T BELIEVE THEM
Report thisBy Truth-versus-Falsehood, September 1, 2009 at 1:33 am Link to this comment
Marie Coco must really be a “cuckoo” “loca” (Spanish for crazy) to naively believe that “it was there in a faraway land of poverty, tribal animosities and historic hostility toward outsiders that a sophisticated terrorist network was allowed to take root, to flourish and plot the spectacular attack.”
Instead of becoming a voice for warmongering propaganda, she should be calling for a serious independent investigation that will inevitably conclude that the 9/11 tragic event was in fact an inside job and a false flag operation.
It does not stand to reason or credibility that such group of ragtag local Afghani fighters, with primitive weapons and technology, always on the run and hiding in medieval caves, are capable of planning and executing such a sophisticated operation, which America and all the West, with their sophisticated intelligence and technology could not even conceive that it could happen.
Marie Coco, you’re an irrelevant warmongering propagandist, and next time I see your name attached to such stupid nonsense I would not even bother to read it.
Report thisBy LostHills, August 31, 2009 at 10:25 pm Link to this comment
Reading this piece can only make a person sad. Sad for Marie Coco, certainly. Sad that responsible editors will reprint this ignorant tripe nationwide. Sad that anybody thinks that we owe Obama anything. Sad for the US and civilian bodies that are stacking up day after day. Sad for eight long years of stupidity with no end in sight. And sad that the American citizenry are aquiescing to it. George Will came out for withdrawing from Afghanistan today, and Marie thinks we owe it to Obama to stay the course. Too much sadness for words….
Report thisBy nestoffour, August 31, 2009 at 10:00 pm Link to this comment
what the hell is this? the new republic? marie, i had a better opinion of you, and TD, you’re sliding ..
Report thisBy Folktruther, August 31, 2009 at 8:56 pm Link to this comment
Why do we need Bushite bullshit when Marie and truthdig and provide us with the same bullshit without Bush? think of all the money we could save if we combined bullshit in one Progressive-Conservative bullshitter. I volunteer; I’ll provide an address to send the checks.
***
WATCH OUT. Al Quaida and bin Laden will get you if you don’t WATCH OUT. We have to fight them over there so we don’t fight them over here. They have developed nuclear powered war canoes that have little feet that can scurry over land. Bush has kept us safe so far from them and now it is Obama’s turn. There hasn’t been a single war canoe that has gotten through our defeneses. And no flying saucers either.
It would just be horrible if we withdarw. Indeed it would, but for the US power system not for the US people. It would totally end the US pretense of being a Superpower, and of Nato of being a real military alliance. Of course Marie doesn’t say that, telling the simple truth being unsophisticated for a experienced truther like herself. And Truthdig. Conveying the crap hot off the presses straight from the ruling class to you.
Report thisPage 2 of 2 pages < 1 2