LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 24, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

How to Make a Million Dollars an Hour

Colbert Slams PBS for Appeasing Koch Brothers

A Call to Action

Obama Heckled During Speech, Warren Lands a Book Deal, and More

After Oklahoma Disaster, Give Thanks to Government

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * A Mission on Climate Change

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
A Call to Action
Act of Congress

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar
The Man Who Sold the World

The Man Who Sold the World

By William Kleinknecht
$17.79

more items

 
Reports

Only One U.S. Official Has Taken an Honorable Stand on Torture

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Aug 25, 2009

By William Pfaff

Thus far in the CIA torture controversy, as in the torture debate that has gone on in the United States since 2001, I can think of only one high American government figure currently in office taking a stand on torture in terms of justice, honor and national integrity.

Never have I seen torture dealt with as intrinsically evil. Its national and international legality has been discussed. Concerned CIA officers have been quoted as saying that “10 years from now we’re going to be sorry we’re doing this [torture] ...”; but they do it. In a 2004 report, which was released in part this week, the CIA’s inspector general wrote, “One officer expressed concern that, one day, agency officers will wind up on some ‘wanted list’ to appear before the World Court for war crimes.”

The question being asked then by top officials was does it work? CIA officers were asking themselves how much trouble will I be in if it doesn’t work?; what will happen to my career if I don’t get results? One superior officer is quoted as warning an agent that if the interrogation fails to produce dramatic results, and al-Qaida attacks the U.S. again, the agent would be held responsible.

The Bush administration said that of course the program worked. Ex-Vice President Dick Cheney ferociously defends the torture program to the present day as having produced high-value intelligence.

Nobody has offered any conclusive evidence that this is so. To do so, it is said, could reveal classified information.

Advertisement

The former vice president has also said that the interrogation program was run by “highly trained professionals who understand their obligations under the law.”

On the contrary, according to the Associated Press. The agency’s first interrogators were put to work after two weeks of training. As previously reported, the torture program “experts” were two psychologists from undistinguished schools and with doctorates, respectively, in family counseling and the use of dieting and exercise for controlling hypertension.

Before the findings of the inspector general’s report became known, one contract interrogator had been prosecuted for beating a man to death in Afghanistan in 2007.

Since then, the IG report has made known illegal death threats to prisoners, staged deaths to intimidate prisoners, threats with firearms and electric drills, and threats to rape a family member in a prisoner’s presence.

The officials involved in the torture program obviously are worried over whether there is a legal defense that would protect them if they should be indicted. That they were just following orders may be true, but has unpleasant historical connotations. A defense that possibly would be strong, although probably not impregnable, would have been a blanket presidential pardon to officials involved.

But that would have been taken as self-incriminating on the president’s part, an admission that crimes might have been committed, whereas President George W. Bush’s presumed position is that nothing illegal could have been done under presidential orders, since a president’s executive power in time of war is supreme—a legal theory yet to be tested in the courts.

This is not an issue in which either Bush or his successor wishes to find himself in public dispute. Thus President Barack Obama’s repeated insistence that the country should be “looking forward, not backward.”

The CIA itself ordered the inspector general’s report, and deserves credit for that; there were many officers who were disturbed by what the agency was doing, and who foresaw what now could happen to discredit not only the agency but the officials involved in what was done.

The IG report was ordered at a time when congressional concern about the situation was mounting, and the finished report was not published. The CIA decided that nothing reported in it warranted prosecution.

The agency certainly knew that if charges concerning torture were pursued up the chain of command, high figures in the previous administration could face charges that would constitute probably the gravest scandal in the nation’s history—and a terrible crisis in its domestic politics.

It is the Obama administration’s attorney general, Eric H. Holder Jr., who, when he took office, and read the CIA inspector general’s report, decided that it must not be buried. He has appointed a prosecutor to investigate whether crimes were committed.

Let us therefore honor Eric H. Holder Jr.—the only responsible official in two administrations to say that torture is evil, criminal and in a nation governed by law must be prosecuted, if the national integrity is to be vindicated.

Visit William Pfaff’s Web site at www.williampfaff.com.

© 2009 Tribune Media Services Inc.


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By Mg, August 27, 2009 at 3:25 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

We’ve seen this many times before: limited scope of investigation, punishment for a few low-ranking stiffs that don’t know any better, mission accomplished, back to business-as-usual! What distinguishes this investigation into epic injustice over any other?

Report this

By Joan Livingston, August 27, 2009 at 2:07 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Am not registered here, where Pfaff and others apparently believe Bush and
Cheney were elected. Mr Pfaff could also check Holder’s conflicts of interest,
including work with the RNC during Bush v. Gore (see OpEdNews.com, among
other news sites)

Report this

By Ching-Ching, August 27, 2009 at 9:46 am Link to this comment

What about Dennis Kucinich? He was making his voice heard about torture, while dubya was still in office.

Report this

By NYCartist, August 27, 2009 at 7:55 am Link to this comment

All the comments combine for a good article.

Report this

By NYCartist, August 27, 2009 at 7:53 am Link to this comment

Wow:took to last paragraph or 2 to get to the nominee.
But don’t start giving kudos for following the law, yet.
Holder hasn’t done much yet, except to follow Obama
on continuing the secrecy and court cases/decisions from the “W” administration.

Report this

By Eso, August 27, 2009 at 1:28 am Link to this comment

Western civilization is built on torture. Whether you believe our “advanced society” had its beginnings 2000 yrs ago at Golgatha with a crucifixion or in the year 1184 (or thereabout) in a fire pit at Constantinople (Istanbul) on the Bosphorus, both crucifixion and incineration are methods of intimidation by the ruling classes. The aim of the methods (torture) is to kill undesirable individuals and intimidate and dumb down the population all around.

So, we have a system in crisis, even though the powers that be keep saying that this is just a classic zag in the zig-zags of business cycles. The rulers (east, west, north, and south, but especifically the U.S. government and Europe) are again trying public displays of torture (the Abu Graib prison photos were not taken to stay secreted in the CIA’s archives, but to find their way to the public sector) as a means to inhibit the rising up of the population of an Earth overpopulated (at least 2 billion live in slums) with unnecessary labor.

The repressions will not work. Too many people are ready to preempt torture by sacrificing their lives just to “show” that the so-called “advanced civilization” has been marching backwards. It is an ancient mode of resistance: a miming of the way things are: theatre in the real.

Report this

By Patrick Cummins, August 26, 2009 at 10:25 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Archie1954 wrote “It is important to remember that the Attorney General has a duty under the law to prosecute war criminals.”

Yes, indeed. As a signatory to the UN Convention Against Torture (CAT), the US has an international legal obligation to investigate and prosecute torturers. In fact, other nations that have signed the CAT also have obligations in this regard. If the US fails to prosecute its criminals, the possibility does exist for other nations to do so. The likelihood of this occurring, however, would have to be seen as remote.

Report this

By DBM, August 26, 2009 at 8:35 pm Link to this comment

Obama may have been elected in the hope that he will break with convention and bring about change.  However, his election was bank-rolled by the powerful for exactly the opposite reason.  Now who has he hoodwinked?  The hopeful public or the confident campaign contributors?

He has appointed a lawyer with many ties to corporate power as his Attorney General and, apparently, let him operate independently as he should.  It remains to be seen if Holder will be driven by the formal duty of his office and will prosecute those who appear to be guilty of the most egregious crimes (torture and election theft have to be top of the list).  To date Holder’s corporate and establishment background seems to have dominated his thinking ... but to be fair he has had a large damaged bureaucracy to fix. 

I’m with Pfaff in hoping that this will be the first in a series of actions where Holder does his duty and Obama allows it.  However, I am very concerned that the parameters of the investigation will be carefully calibrated to avoid upsetting the status quo.

Wouldn’t it be great though, to think that all those powerful big money campaign contibutors were the ones who were duped this time??

Report this

By bogi666, August 26, 2009 at 3:07 pm Link to this comment

Sibel Edmond formerly classified secrets were subpoenaed and brought out in a civil suit. Check BradsBlog for the full story. Washington DC is the cesspool of corruption we know exists and knows no political party boundaries. Her testimony identifies the bribers and the bribed. Just as a something that walks, sounds, looks and craps like a duck is a duck and just as corrupt politicians sound, look and act corrupt they are corrupt. It’s the special interest, campaign contributors that reveal the corrupt politicians. He votes for and speaks for them. Also, they get government contracts and/or tax breaks.

Report this

By Folktruther, August 26, 2009 at 2:17 pm Link to this comment

I don’t know why pfaff lends himself to this bullshit.  He knows aa well as nayone that the Obama regime is still torturing.  Indeed, torture is included in the rewritten military manual.

The torture investigation is almost entirely a public relations coverup.  As Pfaff knows.

Report this
Paul_GA's avatar

By Paul_GA, August 26, 2009 at 12:26 pm Link to this comment

I’d recommend to Mr. Pfaff that he ought not to count his eggs before they’re in the pudding. Many government officials talk the talk; how many of them can also walk the walk?

I’ll believe Holder can walk the walk only when he actually does so, and not before.

Report this

By Archie1954, August 26, 2009 at 9:12 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

It is important to remember that the Attorney General has a duty under the law to prosecute war criminals. In order to prosecute you must first determine if there is enough prima facie evidence to investigate and indict. We are finally at the investigation stage. Really when you understand the governing law you won’t give Mr. Holder that much praise as he is just doing his job. The praise may come later if the high officials implicated are pursued because it will mean that Mr. Holder believes in his responsibility regardless of political pressure.

Report this

By Jim Yell, August 26, 2009 at 6:42 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I have really not been able to understand how the Republicans, or anyone else can have trouble understanding the concept of torture, being torture. We know what we did to the Nazis, who were only following orders.

Bush was never elected Dictator, we won’t even go into if he was ever elected at all. He was obligated to administer our country as one of a number of elected officials with obligations to do his job within the law. He didn’t do that and the fact that he hasn’t been prosecuted or even investigated shows the degree of mistake in allowing elected officials to police themselves.

Report this

By wanked, August 26, 2009 at 5:25 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

But just how effective will Mr. Holders investigation be? He’s only looking into a very few cases, those of low ranking participants. We can hope it opens up the entire nasty can of worms, where w and dick lie at the bottom…

Report this

By C.Curtis.Dillon, August 26, 2009 at 2:00 am Link to this comment

By refusing to investigate high ranking officials of the previous administration, Obama joins them as a co-conspirator and becomes subject to the same criminal charges should something come of this.  It is a moral failure of massive proportions and one that may haunt his administration forever.  This country needs to undergo a serious house cleaning and to remove the myriad stains that Bush/Cheney spread across our nation.  Until we go after these criminals, we cannot stand on the moral high ground in any dealings with other countries.  And, should nothing be done, the groundwork has been laid for further criminal activity.  We need to remember that Rumsfeld and Cheney learned their “trade” at the knee of Richard Nixon, another crook who got away with serious crimes after a pardon from Gerald Ford.  It is no coincidence that they returned to government and resorted to the same behavior years later.  A lesson our current president seems to have never learned.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.