LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 22, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Lock Up Washington

Rise Up or Die

Revenge of the Bear: Russia Strikes Back in Syria

California Man Sues Officers He Says Nearly Beat Him to Death

How America Became a Third World Country: 2013-2023

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Glaciers Are Melting Slowly but Surely
 * NEW! * How America Became a Third World Country: 2013-2023
 * NEW! * Lock Up Washington
Too Soon to Tell: The Case for Hope, Continued

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Act of Congress
Daily Rituals
The Girls of Atomic City

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

We Need to Know What Was Done in Our Name

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Aug 24, 2009
Wikimedia Commons

One of the less graphic Abu Ghraib prison photos shows a detainee in a stress position, one of the “enhanced interrogation techniques” pushed by the Bush administration.

By Eugene Robinson

History’s demands can seem inconvenient, unfair or unreasonable. But they can’t be ignored. The Obama administration has a legal and moral duty to determine whether crimes were committed in the Bush-era detention and interrogation of “war on terror” prisoners—and, if so, to prosecute those responsible.

President Obama has made clear that “he thinks that we should be looking forward, not backward,” as spokesman Bill Burton said Monday. Obama has taken admirable steps toward assuring the nation and the world that the worst abuses—waterboarding, indefinite detention, Abu Ghraib—will not happen again.

Obama’s latest move, lodging responsibility for interrogating “high-value” suspects in a new unit that will report to the White House, seeks to offer further guarantees against torture and abuse. I’m not quite sure what it accomplishes—it takes control of these interrogations away from the CIA and assures they will be conducted under the strict rules of the Army Field Manual, but it seems to me that the president should be able to simply order the CIA to follow whatever rules he specifies. Maybe the new High-Value Detainee Interrogation Group will ensure additional safeguards and greater accountability, but at first glance its likely impact seems more bureaucratic than operational.

More to the point is a report that Attorney General Eric Holder has decided to reopen nearly a dozen cases of alleged prisoner abuse by CIA employees and contractors with an eye toward possible prosecutions. Such action would reverse the decision by the Justice Department under the Bush administration to drop these cases. According to The Washington Post, Holder has decided on career federal prosecutor John Durham to lead the inquiry.

This would put the attorney general in a tough position. That’s OK; he’s a tough guy, and when he took the job he knew it wouldn’t be a walk in the park. But Obama has decided not only to take a hands-off position on the matter, which is a proper acknowledgment of prosecutorial independence, but to reinforce his “looking forward” message at every opportunity. Without taking a position on whether there should be prosecutions, the president certainly seems to be telegraphing one.

Advertisement

Obama has consistently opposed even a comprehensive investigation into human rights abuses and possible crimes committed by the Bush administration. His reluctance is understandable—but it’s wrong.

Given Obama’s ambitious domestic agenda, he could hardly be eager to have to spend time and political capital in pursuing transgressions that took place years ago on another administration’s watch. Inconveniently, however, torture and cruel treatment are clearly against the law. Holder is said to have been appalled upon reading the classified version of a voluminous report on CIA abuses. If there is credible evidence that crimes were indeed committed, I don’t see how the nation’s chief law enforcement officer—or its commander in chief—could just look the other way.

There are those who argue that such prosecutions would destroy the CIA’s morale. But giving interrogators and jailers a “just following orders” free pass is unfair to those in the chain of command who knew these alleged practices were wrong and tried to prevent or halt them. Waterboarding, to cite perhaps the most flagrant abuse, has been prosecuted by the U.S. government as a war crime. This history cannot have been unknown to all CIA employees and contractors.

If Holder’s reported decision to reopen the CIA cases does lead to prosecutions, there is one possible outcome that everyone should find unacceptable: that only the hands-on abusers are charged and tried. Proper investigations must work their way up the chain. In some instances, it may be a midlevel employee who overstepped clear boundaries and ordered subordinates to perform acts resembling those done in medieval dungeons. In other cases, illegal acts apparently were approved at the highest levels. Investigators need to be allowed to follow the evidence all the way to the top—into the White House, if that is where the trail leads.

I’m under no illusion that George W. Bush or Dick Cheney is actually going to be prosecuted by the Justice Department. But I want to know—and I believe the nation needs to know—the full, unvarnished truth of what they and others did in our name. It’s probable that painful scrutiny and lasting disgrace will be the only sanctions that Bush and Cheney ever face. But history demands at least that much.

Eugene Robinson’s e-mail address is eugenerobinson(at)washpost.com.

© 2009, Washington Post Writers Group


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

rico, suave's avatar

By rico, suave, August 28, 2009 at 6:40 am Link to this comment

ardee:

Far more moral and decent than the yahoos on this site who advocate killing Bush and Cheney and hanging people with money.

Show me one (serious, not sarcastic, or parodic) comment I have made on Truthdig which shows my immorality or indecency.

I usually look forward to your posts because you are generally more grounded in reality than most of the usual suspects. I thought you were better than that.

Report this

By ardee, August 27, 2009 at 2:56 pm Link to this comment

By DMFD, August 27 at 1:04 pm #

Hey ardee, I’m really not the cold hearted bastard you think I am.

How, I wonder, is one to judge such as this:

I would bet 95% of you that are whining about torture and what bad things happened to the terrorists in Gitmo would have no problem with it if it saved your own ass.

I am prepared to say you are not a ‘bastard’ as your response to me was certainly civil , but coldhearted does seem appropriate, sorry.

It is not enough, I think, to “stick it out”, one must demand the kind of national policies and actions we the people deserve. The use of torture, to mention only one such misguided action, is not only a terrible way to gain intelligence ( proven many times despite that awful excuse for entertainment, ‘24’), but it brands us with respect to world opinion, endangers our troops if captured and MUST be ended with trial and convictions where applicable.

Report this

By DMFD, August 27, 2009 at 10:04 am Link to this comment

Hey ardee, I’m really not the cold hearted bastard you think I am.  America, I’ll never leave it.  Good or bad it’s mine and I’m going to stick it out.  Sometimes I get a little frustrated at reading posters on this site.  Alot of the folks on here just bitch to hear (read) themselves bitching. Hardly any of them with exception to yourself seem to offer any ideas on how to fix the problem.  So, sorry if I came off a little crass.  No offense to posters like yourself whom are offering ideas.

Peace

Report this

By Maurice A, August 26, 2009 at 8:07 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I think that GW and Cheney should be tortured then prosecuted

Report this

By Archie1954, August 26, 2009 at 9:19 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

It would benefit the country and reinforce the Constitution if both GW and Cheney were prosecuted. the idea that the president and the administration are above the law at any time is the first step to a dictatorship. To nip it in the bud, prosecute and you won’t find any future presidents attempting to make the same egregious arguments.

Report this

By ardee, August 26, 2009 at 3:49 am Link to this comment

rfidler, August 25 at 6:21 pm

The real pity here may be that you actually believe yourself a moral and decent person.

Report this

By gerard, August 25, 2009 at 6:57 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

What is so demoralising for the CIA people? Do they absolutely need torturing people to carry out their mission? If so, there is something very wrong with the USA

Report this
RAE's avatar

By RAE, August 25, 2009 at 4:13 pm Link to this comment

Ya, folks… watch this one “America, love it or leave it.”

“Love” is a living thing… you either nurture it with truth, trust, and open communication, or IT WILL DIE.

Where is the “truth,” “trust,” or “open communication” amongst Americans these days?

NOTHING is forever.

Report this
rico, suave's avatar

By rico, suave, August 25, 2009 at 3:21 pm Link to this comment

OMG!!

I’m looking at that photo, and, like, I’m ready to, like, puke or something!

Can you imagine having your son or brother, or sig other being captured by the Taliban and, like, having to stand on boxes and actually grab their knees? Bent over?? In their underwear??!!!

Where is our sense of decency?

Report this

By bEHOLD_tHE_mATRIX, August 25, 2009 at 2:50 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

DMFD…

Bill Cunningham says you are a great american…and you
can pipe that in your smoke and stick it.

Report this

By ardee, August 25, 2009 at 2:24 pm Link to this comment

Seriously,DMFD, August 25 at 4:49 pm # , you are making a dramatic assumption;  that the rest of us are as cruel and heartless as are you, we are, by and large,NOT. Also, if one considers oneself patriotic then the way America stands exposed as just another despotic torture nation should bother a real patriot.

Further I find you not representative of what my nation stands for , not by a long shot. So, in mimicry of your own political ideology, America, love it or leave it.

Report this

By DMFD, August 25, 2009 at 1:49 pm Link to this comment

Seriously?  Open your eyes “sheeple”.  This is just another distraction to take your eyes off of O’s healthcare debacle.  I would bet 95% of you that are whining about torture and what bad things happened to the terrorists in Gitmo would have no problem with it if it saved your own ass. 
Anyway, once the healthcare thing gets back to the way O wants it then this will blow over and be forgotten until the next time O needs a distraction.

Peace

Report this
RAE's avatar

By RAE, August 25, 2009 at 1:29 pm Link to this comment

The photo shows TORTURE. There is no doubt about it.

Just as there’s no doubt that we, the people, will NEVER know what is being done in our name.

Why? Because we, the people, have completely lost effective control of our government and its agencies. They do exactly as they please and lie through their teeth to everyone about it. They have our money and enough weaponry to fight a war. We have nothing but a few passing seconds of soundbite.

We, the people, are simply an intermittent annoyance easily dealt with… just ignore our “outrage” and within 24 hours, our collective ADD will have us chasing after the antics of some “Britanny” or other.

Report this

By TAO Walker, August 25, 2009 at 11:44 am Link to this comment

“Civilization” is an ideological/institutional/electro-mechanical meat-grinder now gone “global” in its machinations.  “Morality” is a make-believe notion invented and propagated to keep “the meat” from wising-up to their predicament in-time to actually DO anything about it.


Few if any of Eugene Robinson’s “we” here really want to know anything about this “torture” blot on america’s escutcheon….only one of many even much worse.  Knowledge, just like “ownership,” is absolutely nothing except responsibility.  On-the-record, that his hardly the long suit of theamericanpeople.

It’s all ‘moot’ now, anyhow.  This thing is going to its pre-destined dead-end.  Anyone here not wanting to be taken along for the-ride better get together in The Tiyoshpaye Way….a-s-a-p.  Take it from your faithful Indian guide.

HokaHey!

Report this

By Scipio Africanus, August 25, 2009 at 10:36 am Link to this comment

“There are those who argue that such prosecutions would destroy the CIA’s morale. But giving interrogators and jailers a “just following orders” free pass is unfair to those in the chain of command who knew these alleged practices were wrong and tried to prevent or halt them. Waterboarding, to cite perhaps the most flagrant abuse, has been prosecuted by the U.S. government as a war crime. This history cannot have been unknown to all CIA employees and contractors.”

The unredacted portions of the CIA IG report clearly show that multiple CIA employees had exactly this kind of knowledge—but they went along with it anyway. What’s been left unsaid (or is perhaps still redacted) is what lawyers in the CIA’s Office of General Counsel had to say when Mr. Addington and other political operatives acting on Bush’s behalf told the CIA to get with the torture program. What did Mr. Tenet say? He clearly had no moral or legal qualms, otherwise he would’ve resigned.

On the “you’ll hurt their morale” canard:  if the CIA can’t handle legitimate, probing Congressional and legal scrutiny, how the hell can they protect us from al Qaeda?

And John Brennan? The man at the NCTC who was overseeing the production of the reporting derived from torture? Oh yeah—he’s been named the point man for the new inter-agency interrogation group that is supposed to keep torture off the table. Kafka-esque doesn’t begin to describe the current state of affairs in Obamaland.

“I’m under no illusion that George W. Bush or Dick Cheney is actually going to be prosecuted by the Justice Department.”

Eugene, you have platforms—at the Post and on Olbermann’s program—to call for exactly that kind of prosecution, if Durham’s initial inquiry shows cause for doing so. Please consider making such a call a regular part of your column and commentary on this topic.

scipiotheelder.blogspot.com

Report this

By felicity, August 25, 2009 at 10:16 am Link to this comment

Tom Degan - Oh they figured it out alright, they just needed to torture somebody, anybody to ‘get-even’ for 9/11.  (Typical behavior of the bully/chicken shit.)

Morgan1 - You probably recall that when questioned about torture years ago, Cheney came right out and said, “Some times you have to work the dark side.” In the ‘real’ world - unlike the political world - admitting a crime normally leads to an indictment, doesn’t it?

Frankly, Obama’s seeming reluctance to get into this whole issue is probably because once it starts it’s not likely to stop at CIA etc. operatives or even Bush/Cheney but keep right on going into Congress and House members who were guilty of sanctioning the practices by not stopping them.

Of course, I’m all for leaving no stone unturned.  Nothing like a good thorough cleaning to get rid of vermin and roaches who’ve been hiding in dark corners for far too long.

Report this

By Folktruther, August 25, 2009 at 9:13 am Link to this comment

The appointment of a ‘torture prosecutor’ is simply political theater, to be used in Obama’s soaring rhetoric.  Obama is CONTINUING the torture of Bush; how can he prosecute Bushites for it.  Torture is essential to subdue the poppulations occuried by the War on Terrorism.  any fighter against the occupation being classified as a Terrorist.

Report this

By Rodger Lemonde, August 25, 2009 at 6:58 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Had Obama championed the swift and thorough
accounting of the former administrations for their
war crimes the rabid right would have reacted so
vehemently that government would have ground to a
halt.
I have no doubt the Bush administration committed
atrocities based on lies and abused the constitution
with the same abandon they abused detainees and
international law.
Obama offered to consider the views and needs of the
minority and the minority has reacted like a spoiled
brat. The issues of atrocities committed are issues
of law and need to be handled as such. It is not the
function of the office of the President to act as the
nation’s cop.

Report this

By bane-richter, August 25, 2009 at 6:56 am Link to this comment

Eugene, your bosses should be punished for “doing what wasn’t in our name” as well. The Post should, and does, and did, have eye rolling credibility. Essentially owned by Big Defense Inc, the Post sleazily embraced violence, only to out do themselves this year by attempting to profit in Big Health’s war on the US.
The Post FULLY SUPPORTED aggressive military actions in Afghanistan and Iraq. Think about it, if 1150 15th hadn’t published full approval of a murderously destructive oil grab, we wouldn’t need to discuss the creative ways our Government destroyed people.

Report this

By chuckwalla, August 25, 2009 at 6:34 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Yes, the entire Chamber of Horrors should be exposed, but it won’t, of course.  Torture is essential to counterinsurgency; you can’t have imperial occupation without it (I’m a Vietnam vet, so have a little first-hand knowledge).  It doesn’t matter if you’re a red-meat knuckle-dragger, or an Obama liberal.  As long as you occupy another’s country, you will have to use the tool.  The whole criticism of its “ineffectiveness” in getting reliable information is true, but beside the point.  Torture has a more important purpose: spreading terror and dread to induce an insurgency to give up.  In short, we, yes we, are terrorists, no less than those we disignate as such.  Further, the assumption that total exposure would end the practice by our government, is naive.  Most Americans don’t mind torture of “the Other”, due to unexamined attitudes of white racial and cultural supremacy.  This is the ugly truth, which isn’t discussed even, or most importantly, in liberal media.  It’s the elephant in the room.

Report this

By Tom Degan, August 25, 2009 at 6:00 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I’m sorry. It just doesn’t get much better than Eugene Robinson.

Yeah. Let the investigations proceed and the chips fall where they may. In the course of destroying this country, George W. Bush (the First Fool as I loved to call him) undid DECADES of diplomatic protocol.

Were these morons able to get information via torture? Sure they did. Most of that info was false. You see, under those circumstances, the person being tortured will say just about anything. It is quite interesting: no one in this administration (Excuse me, I meant to say, “THAT administration) was smart enough to figure this out.

http://www.tomdegan.blogspot.com

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

Report this

By morgan1, August 25, 2009 at 4:53 am Link to this comment

Mr. Robinson, I don’t know where you have been hiding these last few months, but ample evidence has already come to light (And Cheney openly admitted embracing torture and greenlighting it)that the orders come from the WH and worked their way down the entire chain of command. It has been reported the WH viewed torture photographs, listened to interrogation tapes and viewed videos as well. It has been reported Bush laughed with delight at the “detainee” (POW)being tortured, but then he has a record of being a sadist himself. If only a portion of what has been reported is true, the real truth is the orders originated with Cheney and Bush and ample documents show laws being broken from the top down. Followings orders is no excuse. I consider Obama complicit in covering up war crimes and is a criminal himself. We cannot move on until ALL have been brought to justice. Oh, and for the record, torture is still on-going at Bagram as well as other US holding facilities so nothing has changed.

Report this

By ardee, August 25, 2009 at 4:25 am Link to this comment

ChaoticGood, August 25 at 4:18 am

I agree, in part , with your well posed response.

I would differ in that your definition of the “left” in American politics as “timid”. Splintered certainly, unable to work together , absolutely, refusing to put aside small differences to achieve common goals , without question.

There is very little of a true left in America frankly, but those that do exist face long odds, freakishly long in fact, but do so with no timidity. Their silence is due to the control of the press rather than the cowardice you imply.

There are certainly things worth dying to achieve, honor is a questionable inclusion I fear, and in need of interpretation.  Love of country, protection of the downtrodden, support for the disenfranchised, great principles are all “honorable” and worth the ultimate sacrifice, there are more such to be added to the list. Perhaps this is what you meant.

Report this

By RdV, August 25, 2009 at 3:51 am Link to this comment

What’s the use of responsibility, accountability, integrity, justice and morality, if every instance of barbaric violation of it is swept under the carpet?
  What do we need courts for?
  Let’s just get past this and move on.
Seems the contemptible yet servile Obama has a “hands off” policy everytime he is required to do his job.

Report this

By ExAm, August 25, 2009 at 3:47 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I am under the “disillusion” that vader and his contemptable stupid minion need to be prosecuted.

We are continuing down the road to “feudalism”.  Do all of those dumb sheeple want to continue bleeting from the position of the untouchable?  We will be arriving there sooner than later if we’re not careful.

If they are guilty - guillotine them and send a message to the world that if we fuck up, we eventually fix ourselves.

Sh**&t - that isn’t going to happen - I think I’ll stay where I am at - outside of the banana republic

Report this
godistwaddle's avatar

By godistwaddle, August 25, 2009 at 3:08 am Link to this comment

Bush began a war of aggression—the primary indictment of the defendants at Nuremberg.

Bush began that war with lies.  If the truth is something—a relationship with reality—then lies are nothing.  Thousands of American kids and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis died for NOTHING.

The Bush cabal is guilty of much more than mere torture, bad as that is.  Were we a nation of laws, as they bleat at us, a few hundred would have hanged by now.  As it is, I see little reason for average Americans to obey any law which is convenient for them to break.

Report this
Ouroborus's avatar

By Ouroborus, August 25, 2009 at 2:23 am Link to this comment

“I’m under no illusion that George W. Bush or Dick
Cheney is actually going to be prosecuted by the
Justice Department. But I want to know—and I believe
the nation needs to know—the full, unvarnished truth
of what they and others did in our name. It’s
probable that painful scrutiny and lasting disgrace
will be the only sanctions that Bush and Cheney ever
face. But history demands at least that much.”

Eugene Robinson

Too many people don’t want to know; denial is so much
easier, unless one has a conscience and the moral
rudder to know right from wrong. America still has
the temerity to act like it’s somehow justified in
doing these horrendous crimes but the rest of the
world be damned for the very same crimes.
Unfortunately America will never reclaim the mantel
of moral authority in this world, unless it faces up
to it’s own egregious behaviour. I do not remain
hopeful justice will be served when even the
president himself sees no such necessity.

Report this

By Marc Schlee, August 25, 2009 at 1:59 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

F R E E   A M E R I C A

R E V O L U T I O N A R Y
(D I R E C T)
D E M O C R A C Y

Report this

By ChaoticGood, August 25, 2009 at 1:18 am Link to this comment

I cannot even begin to “hope” that America will come to its senses and remember its “Civics” lessons.  At least with an investigation, some people who have forgotten that America is not about public safety.

The “cowardice” of the right is matched by the “timidity” of the left. This deep misunderstanding of America is obvious.  Everyone says that the “highest” duty of the President is to keep Americans safe. 

IT IS NOT THE HIGHEST DUTY !!!

Safety of Americans is not even mentioned in the Presidents oath of office.

Protection of the Constitution is the Presidents highest duty. NOT KEEPING US SAFE !!!!

Cowardice has led us to torture and compromise our values because we are afraid of the Islamic “Boogeyman”.  BAH, Humbug, Balderdash.  A pox on your fearmongering and on your convenient moralities which allow barbarism in the name of expediency.  No Honor is left for the cowards.

What we are left with are photos of American decline in Abu Ghraib.

Only in asserting that nobody is above the Law, can we hope to reclaim our honor.  There are some things worth dying for and honor is one of them.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.