|
|
May 21, 2013
|
|
The Death of Death PanelsPosted on Aug 21, 2009
The demise of the recent “death panels” debate was quick and painless—unlike so many of the deaths that will occur among those who will now be without the benefit of their doctor’s knowledge of the dying process. The fear-mongering of the likes of Sarah Palin, Newt Gingrich and Chuck Grassley is nothing less than heinous, not because of their flat-out lying (we’re used to that from politicians) but because the real consequence of the demise of end-of-life counseling under health care reform is the comfort and care denied to the intended beneficiaries. As a pastor, I have had any number of occasions to be with a family through the dying process. I have noticed distinct advantages to those who have hospice care or who have the clarity of an advance directive. The patient and the family spend the final months of the person’s life with an intentionality that escapes those who are not counseled by hospice staff. Those not in hospice care are much more likely to spend their final weeks and days in a hospital ICU than at home surrounded by loving friends and family. Those patients who are not enrolled in hospice often undergo painful yet fruitless procedures that become the obligation of hospitals and providers because there is no clear written instruction provided. Relatives are in anguish because they have never had a clear conversation in which the patient has declared his or her preferences of how to be cared for in the last weeks and days of life. Conflicts erupt in this vacuum of information that tears a family apart at the very time it needs to hold together most. Every religious institution should be outraged at the termination of the proposal for end-of-life counseling. As clergy members we are trained in grief counseling but we are not prepared to talk to our parishioners about the medical details of their condition or the process of dying they are likely to encounter given a particular disease. That is a conversation that should be held with a medical provider. That conversation, which can take place in the presence of a spiritual counselor, allows us in the clergy to do our job more effectively. We are also sufficiently trained theologically to counsel our members that a compassionate death is a divine grace. Choosing how one will live until one dies is part of the free will with which we were endowed by our creator. Any proposal that better informs us about the options for life’s final days is one which empowers Grandma and blesses all her children. Many families do not enroll in hospice or complete advanced directives simply because they do not know about them. The provision, now stricken from the Senate Finance Committee health care reform proposal, would have reimbursed doctors who had voluntary consultations about end-of-life care with patients every five years. Sen. Grassley crassly cautioned last week that end-of-life counseling for terminally ill patients would result in a “government program that pulls the plug on grandma.” He tried his noble best to save his dignity by ignorantly asserting that end-of-life counseling should take place “20 years before.” Before what?, I ask. Before you die? First of all, I don’t know anyone who knows when he will die. Young people suffer catastrophic accidents that often pose questions of end-of-life care. But more important, given the rapid advances in medical technology, to fail to have a regular consultation (say every five years) with your physician about end-of-life options is dangerous and irresponsible. To make that kind of monumental decision based on 20-year-old information might certainly lead a person to make a very wrong choice. What troubles me most is the fact that a proposal supporting living wills, hospice care and advanced directives (provisions supported by these same Republicans in recent years, ex-Gov. Palin even having declared a “Health Care Decisions Day” in Alaska) can be defeated by lying, distortion, fear and ignorance. If a proposal this well established and broadly supported can be turned into a “death panel,” what hope is there for the more innovative proposals in health care/insurance reform? Advertisement The Rev. Madison Shockley is pastor of the Pilgrim United Church of Christ in Carlsbad, Calif., and a director of The Center for Progressive Christianity. New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By ardee, August 26, 2009 at 3:47 am Link to this comment
Oh please rfidler
your protestations of innocently wishing to ‘learn the workings of the progressive mind’ are betrayed easily by your garbage:
Most of the posters on this site are totally impervious to satire, actively ignore empirical evidence, the laws of economics, and basic human nature, and do in fact believe that the world runs on moonbeams. They are masters of the non-sequitur, the oxymoron, and above all, the ad hominem attack. They blame all the world’s ills on the US and Israel, think Cuba’s health care system is better than ours, and think 9/11 was Cheney’s doing.
This shows plainly that your mind is closed already, and way before you wandered in here….
Report thisBy Night-Gaunt, August 25, 2009 at 8:09 pm Link to this comment
Well Rfidler, the End of Life Counciling had been around for over ten years and had been passed by a Republican House and Senate with a Republican president so why the change? Fear mongering propaganda where the grass is suddenly redder over there as the Repubs jump almost to a man out of their previously comfortable nitch. Confusing at first until you study them and see how they operate in this partisan way. Its the corporate money stupid! Should come to mind.
As has been discussed before we already have death panels with our present corporate system and the cost of living is put to the test by they accountants on who gets what at their hospitals so? Does that bother you at all?
“Get the government out of my Medicaid.” Sound idiotic to you? It is an example of what propaganda can create in the minds of people. Do you approve? Am I getting through to you?
End of Life issues has been in use for 10 years and no problems until now where it is politically expedient to do so.
Does this help you Rfidler?
Report thisBy rico, suave, August 25, 2009 at 2:53 pm Link to this comment
ardee:
I’m here because I want to know how the “progressive” mind operates.
I, unlike many in your milieu, want to understand how people with a diametrically opposite belief system from my own have come to their beliefs. I’m open to rational debate. All I get are ad hominems and Tourettes Syndrome-like outbursts of “Ch-Ch-Cheney” and “Z-Z-Zionism” and “Cap-Cap-Capitalist pigs!”
So far I’m not encouraged.
Report thisBy ardee, August 25, 2009 at 2:39 pm Link to this comment
rfidler, August 25 at 3:03 pm #
Tour post begs the question; why are you here?
Report thisBy rico, suave, August 25, 2009 at 12:49 pm Link to this comment
Hulk2008:
Do you really believe that a government-run system would have treated your dad better? How did your malpractice suit (sounds like, the way you describe the situation, you had a slam-dunk case) against the “pass-through physician” work out for you?
By the way, how much health care did you really consume while you were in the Air Force? I’m guessing that you were a typically healthy 20-something, and the answer is, apart from annual physical exams, not much. I was in the Air Force for 21 years and most of us used CHAMPUS- private care reimbursed by the Air Force- instead of the base hospitals, even though there was usually some additional out-of-pocket cost. Why do you think we made that choice?
Getting back to the Reverend’s article, why is “end of life counselling” such a big issue in the health care bills? Why do Dems want it so bad, and conservatives hate it so much?
Report thisBy AuntBec, August 25, 2009 at 12:11 pm Link to this comment
Ah Yes, these people…reminds me of stories my grandmother, from the Panhandle of Texas, use to try to tell us about “those people”, you know, the ones that live on the other side of the tracks? Find another site to peddle your thoughtless garbage.
Report thisBy rico, suave, August 25, 2009 at 12:03 pm Link to this comment
Ben Franklin:
If you’re still reading this thread let me give you some advice: Most of the posters on this site are totally impervious to satire, actively ignore empirical evidence, the laws of economics, and basic human nature, and do in fact believe that the world runs on moonbeams. They are masters of the non-sequitur, the oxymoron, and above all, the ad hominem attack. They blame all the world’s ills on the US and Israel, think Cuba’s health care system is better than ours, and think 9/11 was Cheney’s doing.
You’re wasting your time trying to reason with these people.
Report thisBy Hulk2008, August 25, 2009 at 6:50 am Link to this comment
Unfortunately, the self-labeled “Ben Franklin” and others who oppose government in all its forms have never worked in health care or have been victims of insurance companies and their diabolical profit-by-all-means rationing schemes. By contrast, I have worked in health care software over 41 years; I have observed the detalied specifics of insurance claims logic and the arrogance of pompous doctors. My father was, in fact, rationed to death by private insurance: he was misdiagnosed, released from the hospital prematurely for fear his care would exceed clerk-imposed limits, repeatedly re-admitted and re-released on the mere paper-dictated whims of doctors and clerks who had never before even heard his name. As one of his pass-thru “physicians” put it, “A hospital is not an old folks home. They come in here for treatment and we release them because they don’t take care of themselves. They return and then leave here feet first.” This same “physician” arbitrarily placed a do-not-resuscitate band on Dad’s wrist without consulting the family; he lied in his medical notes to the charge nurse about that decision and only reversed his order when one of the grandchildren noticed the band and begged the nurse to remove it. We confronted the Doc; he said “Oh, well. I asked some of the other doctors what they would do. It seemed reasonable to me.”
Report thisI hope for “Ben Franklin’s” sake that neither he nor his relatives end up in similar situations.
By the way, I was in the USAF for 4 years in the 60’s - government health care - it was just fine. Will “Ben” take away the health care from servicemen too?
By Night-Gaunt, August 24, 2009 at 12:49 pm Link to this comment
Both Charles Krauthammer & Rush Limbaugh have worked to advocate, in subtler language that the end of life councilling is a sly way to eliminate you and me. (Not that they need an excuse.) Too bad we already know that the Death Panels have been in operation at area PPO’s, HMO’s & hospitals for decades. Penny pinching corporations dictate to doctors what they can do for their patients. Dumping is optional, literally on the street! But then they like the set up so they will say anything to make sure we never get even a smidgin of repair to our Death Care system.
Report thisBy AuntBec, August 24, 2009 at 9:23 am Link to this comment
NABNYC - Loved it, loved it! Whether it was tongue in cheek, or serious, it was funny and wonderful! I own a home for seniors who can no longer live at home (or go to the bathroom by themselves) and there is no way in hell they would live at our facility if they didn’t already have advance directives about what happens when they start to “fail”. If anyone has ever had a family member who is at the end of their life, I guarantee if there is no advance directive, they sure wish to hell there was!
Report thisBy NYCartist, August 24, 2009 at 6:17 am Link to this comment
Once again, the disabled are left out of the discussion about the disabled, and elderly in re
“end of life” care - even in the discussion on DemocracyNow.
I urge people to look at the really good blog of
Report thisNot Dead Yet, a group begun in the 90s, and the blog
is written by Stephen Drake, research analyst.
Diane Coleman is one of the founders. The articles
are on all related topics, including “death panels”,
short and with links to some great sites. (This group is not affiliated with any political party.)
http://www.notdeadyet.org
By NABNYC, August 23, 2009 at 3:00 pm Link to this comment
“Christian” Doctors Oppose Snuffing Grandma.
My local community has a mega-church/Christian Casino where the rich people go to steal money from the poor by threatening them with the fires of hell and eternal condemnation unless they give big money into the buckets every Sunday.
One of the constant threats that gets people to open their pocketbooks is that if you don’t give enough money, God won’t like you, then you won’t be able to spend eternity with your family—they’ll be in one place, you’ll be in another. I guess they never met my family.
As for snuffing grandma, I know a lot of old ladies I’d personally snuff with or without a kick-back from the insurance companies. Top of my list would be the ones under 5’ tall who drive the big cars, can’t see anything, get a determined look on their face and step on the gas pedal, in reverse, public be damned. I’d pull the plug on them in a heartbeat, the number of times they’ve scared the pee out of me. Go ahead, honk at them—they’re deaf, and they can’t hear. Or they pull out across 3 lanes and wait for everyone to stop so they can go all the way over into the 4th lane, because seventy-two miles from now they need to be in the 4th lane so they can turn right.
There’s also the old lady who works at a local retail store as a checker, and every time she hands me my bag full of whatever junk I just bought she always says “Have a blessed day,” and I always recoil in horror, grit my teeth and close my eyes tight, turn away before I give in to my impulse to put my hands around her neck and squeeze. I bought some paper towels—I didn’t come in for a prayer session.
And why does everyone talk about snuffing grandma, anyway? Why not snuff grandpa, who for whatever sick reasons can never remember to zip his fly? Whole generations of children have been traumatized by flashing grandpas. Why not snuff them, if we want to rid the world of some real unattractive folks?
My local newspaper today had 3 articles written about healthcare in the opinion section. One by a highly respected doctor in the community said nobody’s talking about snuffing anyone, the right-wing is crazy, we do need healthcare reform, everything costs too much, and we need to get serious and stop the screaming. Another one basically said yes we need some, but maybe not everything should be changed.
But the third article was written by a group of 8 “Christian” Doctors. Christian Doctors Against Healthcare Reform. Including 2 plastic surgeons, and we all know how critical they are to the Christian faith. Nobody wants to go to church on Sunday and look at a bunch of ugly people with big noses and tiny little chins. Actually, I think the ugly Christian have to go to to the poor church in the “mixed” neighboring town (you know—the one where everyone isn’t of the Anglo-Saxon persuasion).
The Christian Doctors, each of whom undoubtedly is worth multi-millions of dollars, focused their article on the claim that Obama’s health care reform will “inevitably” lead to doctors murdering patients, pushing confused old people (grandma again) to “choose” “assisted suicide” so the doctor can knock her off rather than treat her. You know—that section of the pending bill. F-ing Morons.
I have a modest proposal. If the only way we can have a functioning health care system that doesn’t bankrupt the country is by exterminating huge groups of people, I say let’s start with the Christians. Hands off Grandma.
Report thishttp://NABNYC.blogspot.com
By Kerry, August 23, 2009 at 11:07 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Freedom to live our life the way WE choose is what we should be fighting to guarantee. As long as the way you live does not stop others from living their life in freedom. Any government, king, god, religious order, bankers, army, gang, or any other entity that can be created should never be given the authority to force people to become a member, even if it might be in the people’s best interests. Why do you think there are so many opinions on this and other subjects? It’s because we all have the ability to judge for ourselves what is good or bad in our own eyes. Social Security, a military draft, communism, forced union membership, a universal Walmart, or Universal Healthcare are all going to fail at some point because people will sooner or later revolt against being forced into a system. I don’t see any difference in a universal system of healthcare or social security, and a promise to live forever peacefully in the Garden of Eden. Eventually humans will want to leave and live their own lives without any oversight. We hate the Garden of Eden even if it would take care of our every need. It’s our nature. The all seeing eye of government is no different that the all seeing eye of God. We hate any government institution, banks, police, or anything else that can peek into our lives at will and give us commandments on how to live. People who wish that we could all just work and live together for the common good have good motives but in the end must realize that that kind of world would never last. Go ahead and worship, beg and believe at the feet of the government, or a party, or anything else, make that your idol and see if one day it doesn’t turn on you and require your life and freedom of choice in return. Choice is what makes us who we are as humans even if it means we die. The best we can do is to try to treat others the way we want to be treated, but if others don’t want to think like you and me, we can’t force them, and shouldn’t.
Report thisBy Rodger Lemonde, August 23, 2009 at 8:12 am Link to this comment
Hey Ben Franklin
Report thisHave you considered the career options of being a
dining room table?
You are more rational than some but you got
arbitrary when you claimed that the insurance model
of health care was not broken. In a nation of 307
million and counting, people will die from the faults
in the current insurance system. My son would not be
alive today if his leukemia treatment had relied solely on his commercial coverage. That is one of
many lives saved by Medicare.
I hope you don’t learn the truth about insurance in a
“they won’t cover what” moment.
Note that the congress and the senate already have a
very solid government run health care system. Try
asking the opponents of reform in the legislature if
they want to renounce their government run system.
By christianecon.com, August 23, 2009 at 8:10 am Link to this comment
“Ben Franklin” wrote:
“I am fairly certain Obama has never thought an issue through
in his entire life. It must be quite a shock to him to be getting
smacked right in the face with the laws of economics and
physics.
Unfortunately, it will take several generations to pay for his
education.”
2000-2008 must’ve been a long time to be in a coma.
Report thisBy ChaoticGood, August 22, 2009 at 10:04 pm Link to this comment
If you let people have a choice about their own manner of death, then you run a risk that someone might decide to use an advance directive and implement a “Do not resucitate” order.
Report thisThat would “rob” the pharma of its greatest source of income. The last months of a persons life consumes more resources than all the resources they consumed during their whole lives.
This argument is not about morality or religion it is simply about money.
Keep them alive at all costs is the Big Pharma message. The hell with quality of life, just one more day of suffering makes the “bottom line” look so much better.
By Urizen o8, August 22, 2009 at 8:58 pm Link to this comment
The end of life provisions were collateral damage, the intended target being any
sort of reform of the current wealth extraction system that masquerades as health
care system. Palin, Grassley and the media played their parts well in an
impressively orchestrated and effective flexing of the health insurance industry’s
muscle.
That the industry saw fit to pulverize what was really only a meager reform
Report thispackage should be very sobering to those hopeful for true reform. Obama is
either the worst tactician in the world or he never was serious about a public
option.
By tropicgirl, August 22, 2009 at 5:12 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Ii am very sorry for you Rev. Shockley. Since when did you feel it was necessary
to vouch for political legislation that has “not been written yet”. (to use the
Democratic excuse).
You totally missed the point. Its not counseling people are against. Death
counseling happens all the time and DOCTORS DO GET PAID FOR THAT. It is
the “cost cutting measures” that are connected to it. Obama is less than honest
here, and so are you.
Even today we see a supposed supporter of Obamacare (another psychotic
doctor or “ethicist”) saying this (from Politico)...
“Given that about a third of Medicare dollars are spent on patients in the
twilight of life, Sabin and other experts say a rethinking of treatment for them
is essential to reducing costs in the system – a major goal of reform.”
What are we supposed to make of this? This is a guy that was “sent out” to
support Obama. Did this guy also counsel the psychologists who supervised
torture?
And of the proposed “savings” according to Obama, not only will we fork over a
trillion, apparently to the health insurance industry, they will also stuff the
“savings” from the “reductions of costs” to the elderly into their pockets.
It is not right that insurance companies decide who lives and dies, or what
treatment they will get. They are NOT doctors. And it is not right for Obama to
encourage the same.
I’m sorry. I am a total liberal, perhaps a little anarchistic, but this is total crap.
As I said before, Obama is being less than honest here. He couldn’t or wouldn’t
reform the financial institutions, letting them steal trillions from the America
taxpayer without any meaningful reform. Who would believe he can do any sort
of reform to the insurance companies? It won’t happen. He bailed out AIG for
God’s sake. No questions asked.
Whenever pastors like this get involved in the filthy part of politics, everyone
loses. He should review his notes on Francis Schaeffer (Sr.) Although many
Christians DO NOT support his remedies, a case can be made for his
assessment of the problems. This stuff is VERY anti-elderly.
And, why would a pastor pimp for insurance companies profits? I do not know.
Report thisSomebody needs to read the bible more.
By felicity, August 22, 2009 at 12:57 pm Link to this comment
I’m confused. The same people who, if I remember correctly, called a special session of Congress to decide the fate of Teri Shivo (sp?) - I call that government interference big time - are now the same people against any government involvement in end-of-life etc. procedures. Am I missing something?
Report thisBy Folktruther, August 22, 2009 at 12:46 pm Link to this comment
The good reveerend here is telling the simple truth, as opposed to the truth he tells his flock on Sundays. Well, both the Gops and the Dems also tell their flocks the Goptruth and the Demtruth, seven days a week. They both specialize in the dinglebat truth. The Dems being the lesser evil, so they are the lesser dinglebats.
The dinglebat truth of the Gops is butressed by Religous Faith, the dinglebat Demtruth by Political Hope. They both lie to the population, the Dems being the Lesser Liars. They both tell the poltruth that helps them win elections. Since they are both funded, media’d and ruled by the ruling class, they both delude the population with power delusions that legitimate them and divert attention from their oppression.
They are bipartisan deluders on the most important things, but the Dems are Lesser Deluders on those things that don’t much matter. On important matters, like death, they are right there with the Gops in obfuscation. Cosnequently the American people are deluded in two different ways, by the Goptruth and by the Demtruth, another example of American Freedom&Democracy;. Extolled by both. but only the Dem lemmings, the lesser dinglebats, get to sing the Dem lemming song:
Oh, I’m a dinglebat and I’m OK
I lie all night and I Hope all day…
Now the fervent Hope is for medical care. The Hope is that the Dem party will rpovide. I suggest lighting a candle; it is cheaper than insurance and almost as effective.
Report thisBy godistwaddle, August 22, 2009 at 12:05 pm Link to this comment
As an elderly gent, I don’t want emotionally involved people like my wife and my kids making decisions about my death. I’ve got advance directives and living wills and stuff up the wazoo just because I want someone professional to say to me or my family, “It’s time to pull the plug.”
Report thisBy Ben Franklin, August 22, 2009 at 12:05 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Yep, we all want the government rationing our care and deciding which treatments are worthwhile and which are not. Nope, nothing like a death panel would be involved in that.
And the government would never, ever use all of our medical records to see who has been taking drugs or had an abortion. They certainly would never use that as an excuse to deny care or incarcerate someone. Nor would they discriminate against people who are fat or who drink… or who vote the wrong way. That wouldn’t happen.
Just keep whistling past the graveyard… A true liberal would never let the government have that much power over them. Fascists and socialists, yes. A free man, never.
It’s not like anything could ever go wrong with guaranteeing payments for people who could not afford their own health care. After all it worked so very well for the mortgage industry.
The economic illiteracy of the Obama-bots is a thing to behold. We have three ways of paying for health care in this country Medicare, Medicaid and private insurance. Two of the three are broken beyond repair and insolvent and we are going to use them as the model to destroy the third. Unbelievable!
The idiot in the White House actually thinks he can get away with saying in one breath that we are broke and in the next that we are going to pay for everyone’s health care. One would have to be completely detached from reality to even conceive of such a thing—- and yet somehow no one calls him on it.
The guy is truly a genius. Thank God he was elected instead of Palin or we might actually be drilling for oil in our own country instead of paying billions of dollars to the Brazilians to help them drill for oil… because it is all about the environment. Who would have known that an economy runs on fossil fuels instead of BS and moonbeams? How could anyone have ever predicted such a thing?
I am fairly certain Obama has never thought an issue through in his entire life. It must be quite a shock to him to be getting smacked right in the face with the laws of economics and physics.
Unfortunately, it will take several generations to pay for his education.
Report thisBy Night-Gaunt, August 22, 2009 at 11:56 am Link to this comment
Besides dening end of life counciling they also are against youngsters learning that we all have timers that at one time not of our choosing (usually) we will all die. Ironically in the 1890’s children were taken to funeral homes to see what happens when someone dies from the embalming room to the tomb stones. Such regressive Christians are of the unfounded idea that if we show children that it will somehow warp their sensibilities. I find it odd for people who preach about an after existence and human mortality that they would want them to know about it. I don’t know what changed their mind from their 19th century predecessors.
But then many of them really have no interest in quality of life just life no matter what, even to the point of unnatural life via machines. A slavish interest in others lives. They should mind their business in this case. Free choice is what they say they believe in but they don’t practice it.
Report thisBy caheidelberger, August 22, 2009 at 8:28 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I did notice Senator Grassley admitted he was wrong, albeit very, very quietly:
“Grassley says he opposes that counseling as written in the House version of the bill, but a spokesman said the senator does not think the House provision would in fact give the government such authority in deciding when and how people die. The House bill allows patients to decide for themselves if they would like such counseling.” (See Washington Post, 2009.08.14)
Report thisBy bogi666, August 22, 2009 at 8:28 am Link to this comment
FYI,The Veterans Administration provides the forms for a living will, without so much fanfare.
Report thisBy doublestandards/glasshouses, August 22, 2009 at 8:11 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
We needed a pit bull as a spokesperson for single payer
Report thishealth care and all we ever got was a bunch of mealy
mouth wimps. The left in this country is always out
gunned by the idiot fringe on the right who are out for
blood before the debate begins. And then we have a
president who doesn’t want to get a wrinkle in his
shirt when push comes to shove.
By ardee, August 22, 2009 at 5:14 am Link to this comment
Ironic that the counciling of the elderly was first written into Medicare by Bush 43….oops!
It is not really amusing that, in a system wherein majority rules, the minority is wagging the dog. How absolutely ridiculous do the Democrats appear, with a majority in both Houses and a President in the White House, being led by the nose by an increasingly small and virulent bunch of extremists?
I believe, barring some miraculous surgical procedure in which the sock puppet Democrats have the Insurance industry and big Pharma’s hands removed from their rectums, that health care reform is a dead issue. The tens of millions of dollars in bribes simply cannot be overcome.
Report thisBy Michael Shaw, August 21, 2009 at 10:52 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The real death panel is the current pay or die system we are forced to swallow. Insurance companies have more say about a patient then does the patient or his doctor. If you’re healthy and pay your premiums on time they love you. The moment you get sick they do everything possible to drop you! Just ask Wendell Potter or that young girl who needed a liver transplant! What really takes the cake, our tax dollars subsidize these corporate bastards. No talk about socialism in that arena. When government gives them money that’s the American way. When it tries to help millions of it’s own people it’s suddenly some kind of Marxist takeover.
Report thisBy ChaoticGood, August 21, 2009 at 10:18 pm Link to this comment
This is all part of the grand Republican design. It is obvious that the Republicans will not vote for any healthcare bill. But they will tantalize Democrats to water down the bill and make it virtually useless and impossible to succeed. Then when it passes on Democrat votes alone and then fails because of the flaws put in it to satisfy Republicans, the Republicans can say I told you so and then win in 2010. Thats all this is about and Democrats better wake up and realize that Republicans are scorpions and they will sting you no matter what they say.
Report thisRepublicans are beneath contempt and we should be putting together the best healthcare bill possible. This gives it a chance to work and tell the Republicans to take a hike on the old “appalacian trail”.
By Rodger Lemonde, August 21, 2009 at 8:30 pm Link to this comment
The Republicans are the real death panel. They don’t
Report thiscare how we die as long as the insurance and
pharmacutical companies prosper and throw obscene
amounts of money their way. The lies and fear mongering
are disgustingly immoral.