LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
February 19, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Ideological Hypocrites

OWS Calls for May Day Strike

Krugman to Playboy: Economic Crisis 'Doesn't Have to Be Happening'

When Iran Talks Back

The .0000063% Election

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Ideological Hypocrites
The Lowdown on Fracking
The .0000063% Election

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Déjà Pooh

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
Churchill

Churchill

By Paul Johnson
$14.97

Hugo!

Hugo!

By Bart Jones
$19.80

more items

 
Reports

Reality Is Its Own Caricature for U.S. in Afghanistan and Pakistan

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Aug 20, 2009
USMC / Lance Cpl. Phillip Elgie

By William Pfaff

The problem with U.S.-sponsored elections in Asia and elsewhere in the non-Western world, as in Afghanistan on Thursday, is that they are sponsored by the United States primarily to legitimize its own presence in the country.

A poll sponsored by the Qatar-based satellite broadcaster Al Jazeera recently asked respondents in Pakistan to identify what they considered the greatest threat to Pakistan today. Eleven percent said it was the Taliban militants; 18 percent said it was the traditional enemy, India; and 59 percent said that the United States was the biggest threat to Pakistan.

A New York Times report published Thursday described the efforts of American officials, including Richard Holbrooke, to convince Pakistani officials, journalists and other notables that the U.S. is anxious to build bridges between Pakistan and the United States, and that the Obama administration represents a great change from the Bush administration.

Holbrooke is President Barack Obama’s special representative to Pakistan and Afghanistan. He told an audience in Karachi that the U.S. under Obama wants to see an improvement in the lives of Pakistanis, and more business opportunities for them as well.

The new administration’s undersecretary of state for public diplomacy and public affairs, Judith A. McHale, met a group of Pakistani journalists, including Ansar Abbasi, an important commentator critical of U.S. policy. She spoke warmly of U.S.-Pakistani relations, and Abbasi politely listened, thanking her for coming. He then, according to McHale afterward, said, “You should know that we hate all Americans. From the bottom of our souls, we hate you.”

Advertisement

McHale also reported that Abbasi went on to explain that Americans “are no longer human beings because [their] goal was to eliminate other humans.” He said that “thousands of innocent people had been killed because [Americans] are trying to find Osama bin Laden.”

To quote the Times’ characterization of McHale’s remarks afterward, “She said that even though she knew that she did not sway Mr. Abbasi, it was good to hear what he thought because she wanted to try to understand the source of much of the anti-Americanism in Pakistan.”

Twelve days earlier, in Washington, Holbrooke had held another press conference, accompanied by many from his team in Pakistan. The purpose was to explain to the American television audience that the mission in Afghanistan is to kill or capture drug traffickers, help farmers grow food instead of poppies, build a public health system, build “civil society” there, and in general rebuild the country.

However, ex-NATO commander Gen. Wesley Clark, another adviser to President Obama, shortly afterward cited the lessons of Vietnam, and said he had counseled the president to emphasize the pursuit of al-Qaida, and not confuse Americans about being in Afghanistan to create a democracy. “Learn the lessons of the past; don’t repeat them.”

Building a new democratic state in Afghanistan might be thought a large ambition, even if the famously energetic Holbrooke and President Obama had the 20 to 30 years or more necessary to get started on such an undertaking, and if the Afghans would put up with the Americans trying to do it.

Ambassador Holbrooke expressed the ambition to add a spiritual dimension to his efforts in the region. He said the religiously motivated enemies of the American presence in Asia “present themselves as false messengers of a prophet, which is what they do. And we need to combat it.” (Surely he has his theology badly confused?)

The New York Times report on this press conference was headlined “U.S. Turns to Radio Stations and Cell Phones to Counter Taliban’s Propaganda,” emphasizing what would seem to be a star project of Holbrooke’s “counterinsurgency expert,” Vikram Singh. It is to build a communications and media system that can reach into every Afghan village to deliver an anti-Taliban message.

As Afghanistan is a very large and mountainous country, and one of the poorest in the world, one would like to know his plan for regularly delivering replacement batteries necessary to millions of peasants to power the new cell phones they have been given, as well as supplying guards (from Blackwater?) to protect from the Taliban the thousands or tens of thousands of satellite receivers or relay stations necessary to deliver the Voice of America into Afghan homes.

Suppose the Taliban taps into the network and delivers its own messages? A learned friend of mine quoted Herbert Marcuse on this plan: “Reality is its own caricature.”

Visit William Pfaff’s Web site at www.williampfaff.com.

© 2009 Tribune Media Services, Inc.


Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By NYCartist, August 24, 2009 at 11:47 am Link to this comment

Tariq Ali’s comment to Doug Henwood (“Left Business Observer” on WBAI’s “Behind the News”, last Thurs.on
the election in Afghanistan,
“Would you call the election in France during the
Nazi occupation a ‘free election’?”

Lost Hills’ comment reminds me of the billboard on
Times Sq. during the Republican National Convention
in NYC, 2004: “You Can’t Teach Democracy With A Gun”
(or words close)

Report this

By diamond, August 23, 2009 at 7:59 pm Link to this comment

Losthills you’re right about democracy not coming out of the barrel of a gun but as Mao pointed out ‘POWER grows out of the barrel of a gun’. The only thing the military industrial complex cares about is money and power - they couldn’t care less about democracy. Without war the only manufacturing industry left in America that actually makes a lot of money- manufacturing wars and weapons of war would cease and leave a giant hole in the American economy and millions unemployed. They don’t call the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan a jobs program for the military for nothing.

Report this

By Jean Gerard, August 21, 2009 at 1:12 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Sorry, but telling other people what to do, or what they should do, is not effective foreign policy. We would have learned this sooner (for God knows we’ve had enough negative signals!) but we think we are right, which in our simple-mindedness makes them wrong.  We are better, which makes them worse. This is known worldwide as Americans’ most annoying characteristic, belief in our “exceptionalism.”  As long as we insist on this fallacy, we are sunk.

Report this

By omop, August 21, 2009 at 5:38 am Link to this comment

America’s foreign policy seems idiotically addicted to encouraging peopl to hate,
America. That is for everyone except Israel. Americans revolted against their very
own and have in the process established over 760 military bases around the
world thereby creating the very same system of control that they took away from
the British.

One does indeed reap what one sows. Killing men, women and children in
Afghaanistan or anywhere else for that matter at the rate of 20 or more a day is
no way to endear people people to the killers.

Report this

By Folktruther, August 20, 2009 at 6:30 pm Link to this comment

Pfaff is a mainstream truther so he can’t tell the reality-based truth to the population consistenly and honestly.  But he often says something that is penetrating, although he can’t spell out the implications out in the mainstream media.

such is his comment that the function of American sponsored elections in occupied countries or client states is to legitimate American power.  If the election turns out well and a supporter of American imperialism is elected, this is Freedom&Democracy;.  If the wrong people get in, they are dictators, even if honestly elected. 

Americans may still fall for this bullshit but the rest of the world doesn’t.

Report this
LostHills's avatar

By LostHills, August 20, 2009 at 6:19 pm Link to this comment

You can’t create a democracy from the muzzle of a gun.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






                        Number of characters remaining: 4000

Are you a human? Retype the word you see here.

     

Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.