LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
November 24, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Obama Risks Losing His Judicial Prize

For 23 Years, Fully Aware but Mute and Paralyzed

Refuse Allegiance to Coal

That's One Big Bang for Mankind

Playbill

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * To Your Health—and Mine

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Freedom’s Fight: Part II

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

Let’s End the Score-Settling

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Jul 29, 2009

By E.J. Dionne

    The problem with “teachable moments” is that the term sets up one group of people as teachers while another group is consigned to the role of pupils. In a democracy, that’s troublesome. 

    In the conflict between Henry Louis Gates Jr. and police Sgt. James Crowley over Gates’ arrest at his own home, all parties in the national conversation believe they should be the teachers. The theme is, “No, you listen to me!”

    Everybody seems to want to teach the need for respect: the respect owed by white police officers to black men, and the respect Harvard professors ought to show to cops doing their jobs.

    It was the perfect moment for professor Barack Obama to try to explain everything to everyone. That is why—after first stumbling into the controversy on Gates’ side—he backed off, arguing that there was plenty of right and wrong to go around, and inviting Gates and Crowley to sit down with each other at the White House.

    Here’s a thoughtful reading all three men should consult. The writer, who happens to be African-American, insisted that “the task for black America is not to get its symbols in shape: symbolism is one of the few commodities we have in abundance.”

Advertisement

    Instead, this writer warned about “a discourse in which everyone speaks of payback and nobody is paid,” and concluded that “the result is that race politics becomes a court of the imagination wherein blacks seek to punish whites for their misdeeds and whites seek to punish blacks for theirs, and an infinite regress of score-settling ensues.”

    Exactly right, and Skip Gates won’t have to do the reading since he wrote those words in The New Yorker in 1995.

    I use “Skip” because I have known Gates for about 35 years. I have long admired him for his prodigious work ethic and for the nuance and thoughtfulness of his writing and scholarship.

    I want Gates to bring this story to an end, both for the reasons he laid out so well himself, and for another. He knows as well as anyone that there is nothing more destructive to the hope for justice and equality than a fight that rips across the lines of class and race.

    Since everybody seems to turn autobiographical during these “teachable moments,” I will exercise my right to do so, too. From the time I was in college in the late 1960s and early ’70s, I have been incensed at the elitism so often shown by privileged liberals toward the white working class. And I felt this as someone on the left.

    I wrote a doctoral dissertation inspired by that concern, and the current controversy led me down memory lane, through college newspaper archives, to see if my recollection of my earlier views matched reality. For what it’s worth, here’s what I wrote in 1973, the year I graduated from college:

    “What is most disturbing about conservative attacks on the student left is that many of the charges were right on the mark. The student left often did come to be characterized by its own forms of elitism and intellectual arrogance. ...

    “Even more pernicious and divisive were race issues. It is clear, of course, that black demands for political and economic equality are justified ... [but] the way these issues developed ... served to estrange the working class white from the movement for equality. White workers rebelled because they felt they were being forced to pay an inequitable share of the costs of equality. ... Sadly, whites who protested against being singled out were too often attacked as racists. ... In the end, the losers were those who had the greatest stake in social reform—white workers, blacks and the student left.”

    I risk the indulgence of quoting my younger self to suggest that we have been watching this same game for too long. It’s a game that always turns out badly for those seeking equality and social reform. At the time he was asked to comment on Gates, Obama was trying to make the case for universal health coverage—for the largest step toward greater social justice since civil rights and Medicare—and it took only the single word “stupidly” to send everyone scurrying back to that “infinite regress of score-settling.”

    Sgt. Crowley should not have arrested Gates, as the police implicitly acknowledged by dropping the charges. But Gates knows that this police officer with a good record is not the enemy. Let’s end the score-settling right now.
   
    E.J. Dionne’s e-mail address is ejdionne(at)washpost.com.
   
    © 2009, Washington Post Writers Group


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By rfidler, August 4 at 6:51 pm #

EJ Dionne is such a traitor to Truthdiggers! Imagine! The possibility that Skippy Gates might have over-reacted!

Report this

By John Hanks, August 3 at 9:54 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Learnable moments are better.  We should understand that the world is made up of crooks, suckers, and lazy cowards on all sides.  A couple of lazy cowards have a misunderstanding.  Crook media gets the story.  A nation of suckers falls for it as usual.

Report this

By Woody, August 2 at 1:18 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

But Gates knows that this police officer with a good record is not the enemy. Let’s end the score-settling right now.

EJ Dionne, as ever, full of shit.

The cops were WRONG. Gates had no way of knowing of Crowley’s allegedly sterling record.

He had a fucking pig invading his residence like HE owned the place, insulting the resident, and throwing his weight around.

This is archetypal pig/cop behavior when the cop feels he has the weight of social superiority over the “perp.” To a cop, every ‘perp’—alleged or actual—is an enemy. Gates knows/knew that and acted accordingly.

Gates real mistake was demanding the pig reveal his name and badge number. By that act, gates revealed he had pretensions to be of the class of citizens—the good burghers—from whon the cops take their orders, not that class of citizen upon whom those orders are exercised.

When Gates acted like a white man, the cop had to introduce ambiguity into the event. Enter the Cambridge Keep The Negroes In Their places SWAT team, and the arrest of Gates on grounds of being uppity.

Cops NEVER let ‘inferiors” get away with being “uppity.” NEVER…

That’s the story, whole and complete. Everything else is just rationalization bullshit…

Report this

By HighHopes, August 2 at 1:07 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Anarcissie, your assessment is dead on the mark.

Gates was arrested while at home minding his own business and doing nothing to anyone. He is in no way a criminal. He is the very opposite. What this “teachable moment” really teaches us is that a policeman, a government agent, has the power shackle and imprison any of us at any time no matter how many years we have spent following each and every rule and doing the right thing.

The problem isn’t that an officer lost his cool and shackled and imprisoned a profoundly law abiding citizen. The problem is that he can shackle and imprison him.

What are we supposed to learn from this “teachable moment?” It turns out to be the usual thing—personalities. It seems this has nothing at all to do with a grave structural problem that is destructive to any free society. Nope, no problem there. As usual we are enticed to concentrate on the individual personalities of the actors involved.  Ah yes, if only we had some way to delve into the personalities of Gates and Crowley, if only we could peer into their very souls, we could fix everything and all will be well. Well then, only one way to do that——beer!

Maybe the pundits advising us are on to something. Beer is the answer. Instead of giving it to Gates and Crowley we would be better off drinking it ourselves. If we get drunk and stay drunk we wouldn’t need to listen to any more of their “teachable moments.”

Report this

By Paracelsus, August 2 at 12:34 pm #

@ Purple Girl

The Left operates in Lofty, abstract concepts- The Right does not. To make this a ‘teachable moment’ we must work within the confines of their cognitive abilities.

What makes you think anybody needs to be taught anything? And I tend to think Left-Right are just words. The legitimate Left and Right are not heard by their “betters”. Over time the tendency has been to take orders from the financial sector of the economy. Main street has been starved of capital.

As to the rest of what you have to say, it is arrogant and insulting.

Report this

By Paracelsus, August 2 at 12:29 pm #

@ Purple Girl


Second- being “On the Job” means he was being paid TAX DOLLARS, only to waste time and $$$ with an insignificant situation. Come On Teabaggers- this is your cause,right?
Third, Gates was on his own property, something the rightwing holds dear. Always screaming about Police State whenever one of your Compounds are raided- Ruby Ridge, Waco,LDS.

For some reason the word compound has that denigratory sound to the ear. Policemen should be taught that no matter how loud and obnoxious the citizen gets, he should respect his rights. Police misconduct is an issue important to all citizens.

I consider the incidents at Ruby Ridge and Waco to be particularly heinous. At Ruby Ridge, a mother suckling her baby was shot through the face. There was no reason to suspect her as being a danger. At Waco, women and children were burned to death in order to get one man, David Koresh. What happened at Wounded Knee has similar qualities of atrociousness. These are human rights violations and I don’t see the need to segregate the cases according to whose politics I am sympathetic to.

Report this

By Purple Girl, July 31 at 8:06 am #

Discussing the underlying psychological or sociological implications related to this stories is uselesss when trying to educate the far right. These folks have difficulty comprehending the abstract.
Their reality and mental abilities are limited to only the obvious and concrete.
So Right wingers, perhaps this would straighten up the controversy for you.
Sgt Crowley is an employee of the City & state. He is under the obligation to follow policies, procedures and protocols. He was on the Job so it was his duty to manage the situation to the best possible outcome.
Second- being “On the Job” means he was being paid TAX DOLLARS, only to waste time and $$$ with an insignificant situation. Come On Teabaggers- this is your cause,right?
Third, Gates was on his own property, something the rightwing holds dear. Always screaming about Police State whenever one of your Compounds are raided- Ruby Ridge, Waco,LDS.
The Left operates in Lofty, abstract concepts- The Right does not. To make this a ‘teachable moment’ we must work within the confines of their cognitive abilities.
It’s like trying to discuss the philosphical quandry of the ‘Mind/ Body’ with a 3 yr old. They know what a ‘boo boo ’ is when they feel it, but can’t picture as a potential outcome in the future because of their actions.
Rightwingers need to see and feel the ‘boo boo’- in their own interactions with the police and in their wallets.Conceptualization is beyond their cognitive abiliities. Show them the Tab for this incident, How many people want to pay for an unprofessional over reaction to a “Yo Momma” comment?

Report this

By chaztv, July 30 at 6:28 pm #

I also went back in time to a small matter of injustice when thinking about the Gates/Crowley incident.  As several writers have now pointed out this case joints at the intersection of police abuse of power, common sense when dealing with authority and civility.  I suggest those interested in examining the many facets of this story see:

Gore Vidal:
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20090728_america_the_great_police_state
Chaz Valenza:
http://www.opednews.com/articles/What-won-t-be-said-at-the-by-Chaz-Valenza-090729-717.html
Harvey Silvergate:
http://search.forbes.com/search/colArchiveSearch?author=harvey+a.+and+silverglate&aname=Harvey+A.+Silverglate

Report this

By George Kalis, July 30 at 2:30 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

The officer has a legal right and professional obligation to investigate the reported break-in thoroughly.  Had the circumstances been different and the professor was injured in another part of the house while a perpetrator showed the officer the professor’s ID, and the officer left the scene, all those reverse racists would be screaming for the officer’s job, or worse, for racist dereliction of duty. No matter how you spin the facts of the case, Professor Gates’ conduct was beneath him.

Report this

By SusanSunflower, July 30 at 1:51 pm #

I might have agreed that Gates should drop it—and get on with making that documentary—however, the police department’s insistance that Crowley acted without fault as an exemplary officer, Crowley’s refusal to apologise and the national outrage at Gates’ uppity behavior and expectation of better treatment, coupled with the revelation that “most Americans” believe that this sort of arrest is to be expected, accepted, and “deserved” in this case, has led me to regret President Obama’s “ministrations” which have effectively preemptive PREVENTED the natural resolution of this unpleasant incident—which we keep being told is hardly extraordinary or uncommon, except, ironically for the presence of Mr. Gates. 

Yes, most folks sit down, shut up and move on ...

Obama calls for attention to race matter but shutting down their normal avenues of address or by claiming the podium as his alone ...  additionally, I think it’s going to backfire on Obama in ways that—left to the normal existing avenues of redress on both sides—it would not have otherwise.

Report this

By hippie4ever, July 30 at 12:40 pm #

The article also ignores the huge pink elephant of distributed wealth. Minorities and the white working classes are forced to one-up each other to obtain an equality of…leavings. We are fighting over the crumbs left by the One Percenters who own the lion’s share of this society. There isn’t enough for us because those rich pigs took it all for themselves.

I’d bet my life Obama NEVER brings this up during his upcoming beer clatch with Gates and Crowley.

Report this

By ThomasG, July 30 at 12:28 pm #

With regard to Professor Gates and being arrested by law enforcement in his own home, it would be well if everyone other than Professor Gates could remove themselves and their issues from the situation, and see Professor Gates as nothing more than a man who was arrested by law enforcement in his own home, deal with that fact alone, and recognize that the police have been engaged in arresting people for years without cause and without regard for race, religion or national origin.

The rough shod tactics of law enforcement and a compliant and complicit judicial system that has put more American citizens in prison than China, a nation with a population of one billion more people than the USA, is what should be the legitimate dialogue that resulted from the arrest of Professor Gates in his own home, and it still should be if anything is ever going to be done about the improper criminalization and imprisonment of American citizens in the name of law and order.

Report this

By Hulk2008, July 30 at 11:40 am #

Face this fact: the incident involved two people whose careers had already sensitized them in advance.  Mr. Gates specializes in analyzing and responding to race-related issues - he’s already immersed in this stuff.  Officer Crowley has spent a considerable portion of his career dealing with perpetrators which stats tell us are predominantly non-white, non-affluent. 
  In both men is surely a built-in knee-jerk propensity toward certain biases - IN SPITE OF training, personal character, and intellectual decisions. 
  The situation was one of emotion not cold logic - like Captain Kirk slamming Mr. Spock, getting him to react with his half-human emotions.

Report this

By Anarcissie, July 30 at 10:41 am #

Above all, let’s pretend this fandango is only about race and class, and there is no question of the extraordinary growth of police powers in our time, so that now arresting a man in his own house because he isn’t sufficiently subservient to the police is just “a cop doing his job”.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.