![]() |
![]() |
||
|
Health Plan: Ask ‘What,’ Not ‘When’Posted on Jul 23, 2009By Marie Cocco It’s not yet time to say that the political debate over this year’s effort at health insurance reform has reached its low, since we’re sure to hear more hyperbolic charges about socialized medicine, meddlesome government bureaucrats that might replace meddlesome corporate bureaucrats—and how we shouldn’t tax the rich because after all, they create jobs! Any sentient person might wonder where all these jobs are, and why this upper-crust, job-creation engine should be spared a tax surcharge to finance insurance coverage for those who do not now have it. But that would be a digression. What we apparently are supposed to be talking about is when health legislation should be passed—before the August congressional break? Just after that? Never? Now that it’s gripped the imaginations of politicians and the media, the politics of the calendar has overtaken the plain truth that Congress already is moving—barely moving, and not necessarily to a triumphal finish—toward expanding coverage, reordering convoluted medical payment systems that breed inefficiency and raise costs, and cleaning up some messes in Medicare created when the Republicans controlled Congress and gave away billions to drug makers and the insurance industry. Maybe this isn’t a very encouraging beginning. But making a truly fresh start would require the political courage to acknowledge that the workplace-based, private insurance system is too far gone to save with a hodgepodge of fixes. It would force us to acknowledge that to get the definitive cost controls politicians say they want, we would need cost controllers—those worrisome government bureaucrats—to impose rules that consumers, medical providers and the private insurance industry have failed to deliver through market “magic.” Advertisement It would expand coverage, according to the Congressional Budget Office, so that 97 percent of adults (not counting illegal immigrants) would have insurance. It would create a public plan as one option for individuals to purchase. And just to set the record straight, this is the clearest path to the culture change needed to upend the payment schemes that now contribute to ever-higher costs. The nonpartisan Commonwealth Fund, a health care think tank, studied three options for new plans and found that by far the most effective mechanism to drive costs down—with savings for the federal government, consumers and employers alike—was the creation of a public plan that would pay medical providers at the same rates that Medicare pays. A middle-ground option along these lines, creation of a public benefit plan that pays doctors and hospitals somewhat more than Medicare, is included in the House proposal. Meanwhile, though political ire is directed at the proposed surtax on high-income Americans that would finance much of the House bill, this is the only provision in any bill we’ve yet seen that effectively states the obvious: There has to be a clear source of revenue to finance all of this. The surtax is transparent. We know who would pay it and how much it would raise (about $544 billion over 10 years, according to official estimates). It doesn’t need a slew of adjustments and exceptions, such as those now contemplated in the Senate for taxing workers who benefit from high-cost health insurance premiums. Any tax on these benefits would require political compromises to account for vast regional differences in premium costs, and, for example, generally higher premiums paid by employees in small firms or those dominated by older workers. Though the surtax may well be jettisoned, there are unequivocally necessary parts of the House bill that must remain. Chief among them is elimination of overpayments to insurance industry managed-care plans that serve Medicare patients. Taxpayers now spend 13 percent more per patient in these HMOs than they do for a patient enrolled in regular (yes, government-run!) Medicare. Another must-have is a provision to force drug makers to reinstate discounts for Medicare patients who are poor enough to qualify for prescriptions under Medicaid—a rebate that was in place until the Medicare drug benefit legislation, laden with gifts to the pharmaceutical industry, was implemented. You can call these nagging details. But surely they’re more significant than whether a bill passes next month, or the month after, or even by Christmas. Marie Cocco’s e-mail address is mariecocco(at)washpost.com. © 2009, Washington Post Writers Group Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By Bud, July 27 at 6:37 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Hey creeps in congress!Do any of you bastards know how many americans will die the month you are on your month long hiatus?ALMOST 2,000!Enjoy your vacation,and your health care you have.BASTARDS!!!
Report thisBy Mark E. Smith, July 26 at 4:18 pm #
When I heard that Congress might not push through a deeply flawed health care bill before it recessed, I was elated.
Single-payer has been making steady progress. At first we were marginalized and told we were a small minority. When that didn’t work we were arrested for attempting to speak out. When they ran out of cops, Obama admitted that single-payer is the best possible plan, but said that for some reason it isn’t possible, as if the American people do not deserve or cannot achieve the best.
I’m an American and I disagree. I think we can accomplish anything we set our minds to—yes we can. When what we are doing is possible, we do it quickly and easily. But when we do the impossible, such as building the first nuclear weapons or landing on the moon, it usually takes a little time.
So if Congress and the President think that single-payer is impossible, tell them not to be in such a hurry. We’re Americans and we’re accustomed to accomplishing the impossible.
In this case, since every other developed country already has a national health care plan, what we’re going to do is known to be possible, so all we have to do is study and adopt the best of existing plans. We save the cost of the research that other countries have already done for us, and we benefit from their successes and mistakes.
There is no reason whatsoever that we shouldn’t have the best single-payer health care system in the world, and when your Senators and Representatives come home during their recess, make sure to tell them so. Pack their town hall meetings. Visit their offices. (When you see the pitiful “better dead than red” folks opposing single-payer as socialist, tell them to go ahead and drop dead already—the cold war is over and we need health care for all Americans) Fly SINGLE-PAYER banners over their golf courses. Hold single-payer rallies outside their mansions and clubs and the ritzy hotels where they hold fundraisers.
Don’t donate a dime to any politician who hasn’t committed in writing to single-payer.
Use natural dietary or herbal remedies whenever possible rather than buying over-the-counter stuff from pharmaceutical companies that are lobbying against single-payer. Don’t let them use your money against you.
Report thisBy Mark E. Smith, July 26 at 4:17 pm #
And don’t settle for the lesser of various evils that Congress may offer you. They all have single-payer health care themselves, so they know that’s the best plan, they just don’t want us to have it. Don’t let them rush you into buying a lemon—there is no timetable, but we have an obligation to ourselves to make sure that they get it right.
They pushed through deregulation, they pushed through tax cuts for the rich, they pushed through wars, they pushed through torture, they pushed through electronic voting machines, they pushed through the PATRIOT Acts and Homeland Security, they pushed through bailouts, but it is time for us to push back.
For many Americans, this is a matter of life and death. Most U.S. personal bankruptcies are due to medical costs. A government that can lose trillions of dollars (the Pentagon) and give away trillions more without knowing where it went (the Fed), can’t poor-mouth us when it comes to health care.
In addition to signing all those petitions, remember to phone or email your representatives a few times a day and tell them you want single-payer.
And start circulating petitions to take away single-payer health care from elected officials who won’t sign on to single-payer for the rest of us. It doesn’t have to be anything fancy, just write it up, print it out, post it online, and every time you get a few hundred signatures, send it to your representatives.
They’ve got trillions for war, trillions for bailouts, and no money for health care? Could that be because they’ve been throwing away so much of our hard-earned money on stuff we don’t want?
Maybe our elected representatives are simply not paying attention. Maybe they’re like kids who don’t want to do their homework. Maybe we have to sit them down, stand over them, and tell them that they can’t go back to D.C. to play until they get their homework done.
And it is okay to threaten them with the loss of your vote. Not that you’ll vote for their opponent, but that you won’t vote at all. Fifty percent of Americans already don’t vote because we believe that nobody on the ballot represents our interests (those who do have no chance whatsoever of winning because they don’t get media coverage and are barred from debates). If you don’t think that anyone of the ballot with a chance of winning will represent your interests, don’t vote. The one thing they can’t withstand is an election boycott. If only ten or twenty percent of the electorate turns out to vote, they can’t claim to have been democratically elected, to have a mandate, or to represent us.
You made a mistake when you voted to delegate your power and authority to other people to make your decisions for you. You have no way to hold them accountable when the decisions that they make are against your best interests. Stop authorizing other people to do things that you don’t want. Tell them that either they start representing you, or you won’t vote at all. We vote for representatives, not dictators or petty tyrants. Either they start listening to us, or we stop voting.
Report thisBy MeHere, July 24 at 7:12 pm #
W. Wexler,
I appreciate your thinking and I envy your enthusiasm. I’ve kind of had it with hoping for good things. I’m hopeful about individuals but not about US government with the people who get elected to office. When something good happens, sooner or later we get short-changed in some other way. There is no concerted approach to improve the quality of life for everyone in our society. You mention public strikes in Europe. There’s a tradition there that calls for solidarity among the labor force. Here, everyone is out for himself.
I will support anything that comes my way regarding the issue of getting sensible health care reform. I’m not an expert on organizing this and I’m in no position to do more than lending support. I’ll sign petitions too but, please, don’t waste your time in getting signatures for internet petitions. According to experts, internet petitions are highly ineffective. Letters via P. Office seem to get better attention from the pathetic politicians.
In any case, we need to keep the issues alive and share views and information in the hope that more people realize how important this is.
Report thisBy Gloria Picchetti, July 24 at 8:30 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Hey Outraged, thank you, for the link to the petition. Some of the petitions do not nail the issue as well. And thank you Marie for the well written article.
Report thisBy tmullins, July 24 at 6:17 am #
Mitch McConnell and his Republican cohorts are worried reform will create rationed health care and are worried American’s will end up standing in long lines to see a doctor. That’s what we have already. UnitedHealth is making record breaking profits. My father died thanks to rationed care and what is called quality health care in Tennessee and Virginia. As a former health care giver, I am sad to see profit care comes ahead of patient care.
http://www.wisecountyissues.com
Report thisBy Outraged, July 24 at 1:02 am #
Do not sell President Obama short. Challenge him, he has said….. put it on HIS DESK. Let’s put it there, right there, on his desk….. I say, he’ll sign it.
Time to “warm-up” the feet of our 535 congress members who apparently believe they are exempt from the voice of The American People. START HOLLERING.
Make a couple of phone calls:
The crucial battle for single-payer healthcare is in the House Energy & Commerce Committee (E&C). On Monday, Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) tried to offer a single-payer amendment but chairman Henry Waxman ended the meeting early to avoid a vote.
On Monday we asked our 600,000 subscribers to call E&C Democrats and below are the results you reported. Keep calling everyone who isn’t in the “support” column! Hill staffers tell us your calls are “very helpful.” And send our single-payer petition to your own Representatives.
http://www.democrats.com/single-payer-committee-whip
Consider Huey Long:
“Long proposed a new progressive tax code designed to limit the size of personal fortunes. The new tax code would tax the first million dollars of wealth at zero. The second million dollars of wealth would be taxed at 1%. The third million at 2%; the fourth million at 4%; the fifth million at 8%; the sixth million at 16%; the seventh million at 32%; the eighth million at 64%; and the remainder at 100%. Income tax rates would be at 100% for all incomes over $1 million.
The resulting funds would be used to guarantee every family a basic household grant of $5,000 and a minimum annual income of $2,000-3,000, or one-third of the average family income. Long supplemented his plan with proposals for free primary and college education, old-age pensions, veterans’ benefits, federal assistance to farmers, public works projects, and limiting the work week to thirty hours.
Denying that his program was socialist, Long stated that his ideological inspiration for the plan came not from Karl Marx but from the Bible and the Declaration of Independence. “Communism? Hell no!” he said, “This plan is the only defense this country’s got against communism.” In 1934, Long held a public debate with Norman Thomas, the leader of the Socialist Party of America, on the merits of Share Our Wealth versus socialism.
Long believed that ending the Great Depression and staving off violent revolution required a radical restructuring of the national economy and elimination of disparities of wealth, retaining the essential features of the capitalist system. After the Senate rejected one of his wealth redistribution bills, Long told them, “[A] mob is coming to hang the other ninety-five of you damn scoundrels and I’m undecided whether to stick here with you or go out and lead them.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huey_Long
ENDORSE SINGLE PAYER.
Report thisBy Outraged, July 24 at 12:09 am #
“Tell me why”
Mothers crying in the street
Children dying at their feet, tell me why
People starving everywhere
There’s too much food but none to spare, tell me why
Can you see that shaft of sunlight
Can you see it in my eyes
I can feel the fire that’s burning
Anger and hope so deep
So deep within my heart
Before my eyes
For some it’s too late
It seems there’s no-one listening
People sleeping in the streets
No roof above, no food to eat, tell me why
See the questions in their eyes
Listen to their children’s cries, tell me why
If there’s a God
Is he watching
Can he give a ray of hope
So much pain and so much sorrow
Tell me what does he see
When he looks at you
When he looks at me
What would he say
It seems there’s no-one listening
Who would think it still could happen
Even in this time and place
Politicians, they may save themselves
But they won’t save their face
Just hope against hope
It’s not too late
You say there’s nothing you can do
Is there one rule for them and one for you
Tell me why
Listen can you see that shaft of sunlight
Can you see it in my eyes
I can feel the fire that’s burning
Anger and hope so deep
So deep within my heart
Before my eyes
For some it’s too late
It seems there’s no-one listening
Hurry for me, hurry for me, they cry.......GENESIS
http://www.elyrics.net/read/g/genesis-lyrics/tell-me-why-lyrics.html
Report thisBy William W. Wexler, July 23 at 10:46 pm #
Hi, there, MeHere,
I agree with you completely on your meta view of the Obama campaign/administration. I saw it about 14 months ago when I quit working for his campaign and went to work for Nader.
Regarding support for a single payer option, I think some clarification is in order and I sure wish the press would have demanded it last night instead of whatever it was they did. The polls register a high level of support for a “public option” or a “government sponsored plan” but you’re right, nobody really knows what that means. Obama was the screen upon which we all projected our own image of him.
He clearly doesn’t support single payer now, although he would never say that. He did say that he was in favor of it in 2001 or thereabouts. But that’s water under the bridge.
We can operate on one of several speculations. First, single payer is just dead. That’s the least palatable one to me. Second, it won’t be included in this legislation but the door will be open for states to do it through the Kucinich amendment. Third, it won’t be included in this legislation but after some period of time it will be added because in fact it’s the only relief we can get from health insurance costs. Fourth, it’s still in play and if we pull the right levers and push the right buttons and rattle enough cages, perhaps it could just happen.
(Disclaimer: there very well may be other speculations)
The fourth case is the one I would like to see exhausted before I start packing for Canada. Harry Reid’s declaration that the Senate will not pass a bill before the break is actually good news for the 4th case. It gives those of us who want to pursue it the opportunity to do something spectacular to make a statement that the elected bums in Washington cannot ignore.
I have signed about every petition that comes my way. It’s not going to change much. One of our Senators (Grassley) won’t vote for anything. and Harkin will vote for anything the Democrats put together. But what could actually change Grassley’s mind?
I have a theory about this. I believe that if enough of us raise a stink, they will fold. You may remember when the farmers in Wisconsin were dumping milk. It worked. Remember when the tractor convoy hit Washington? In Europe, there used to be public strikes all the time. (As an aside, there probably still are but we don’t get that kind of news because our leaders don’t want us to get any ideas).
So I’m suggesting that we somehow organize a public action on a national scale during the Congressional recess. This would be something simple, like a work stoppage, a walkout, a slowdown, or anything that will non-destructively show the mass of support that exists for single payer.
In order for this to happen, people have to know what “single payer” means. They must know that HR 3200 doesn’t include it and they must know the Senate Finance Committee will never author a bill that contains single payer.
So we need a mass marketing project ($$) to raise awareness and then find a way to motivate people to join the action.
I think it’s possible, I am not saying it’s likely. If anybody has any ideas on how to get this done please feel free to Tweet me. I don’t have a lot of resources, but at least I am willing to try anything that’s legal and peaceful.
-Wexler
Report thisBy yours truly, July 23 at 7:05 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Why Fight For A Health Plan That Won’t Work?
“Anything’s better than nothing.”
“Not when we’ll get but one shot at health care for all.”
“Based on?”
“This insurance company plan not only won’t deliver the goods (optimal health care for everyone) it’s bound to collapse on account of corporate greed, whereupon, we’ll be inundated with Republican cries of “told ya so, told ya so, government’s not the solution, it’s the problem, so let’s get back to the tried and true American way, whereby everyone’s on his or her own.’”
“But if we don’t fight for this or that piece of legislation, or this or that appointee, or for or against this or that war, what then?”
“We rise up en masse.”
“The reason being?”
“There is no alernative.”
“Based on?”
“Perpetual war + global warming + economic collapse = doomsday, not to mention the fact that time’s running out.”
“Anything else?”
“Yes we can.”
Report thisBy MeHere, July 23 at 6:26 pm #
W.W. Wexler:
I agree….. “the fantasy continues, it expands.” You make some very good points.
But on the question that the public supports a single payer public option, I don’t seem to have evidence that it is so. Most people distrust single payer or don’t even understand what it is all about—and, as you say, Obama never gave it a chance and it was never included in the reform talks. There seems to be some support for a having a public option but that’s a different story.
Let’s remember that, in his campaign, Obama never said he would fight for single payer, and he also said he would increase the number of troops in Afghanistan and expand the war. Those who voted for Obama got what they voted for. What they may have expected from him was a mirage. It’s almost time to forget about Obama and his Democrat gang already and reflect instead on the subject of how we elect people to office.
Report thisBy Mary Ann McNeely, July 23 at 4:56 pm #
But making a truly fresh start would require the political courage to acknowledge that the workplace-based, private insurance system is too far gone to save with a hodgepodge of fixes.
A “hodgepodge of fixes” may very well be all anyone will get.
Report thisBy FreeWill, July 23 at 3:21 pm #
Hum??? Wonder how log it would take to have working Universal Single Payer Health Care if Ralph Nader was President?
Problem is we DON’T have any leaders elected. We only have followers of the Corporate will.
Now think about it. If you were being wined and dinned every day and had someone throwing money at you as long as the “debate” continues, exactly why would you want it to come to resolution?
Report thisBy BobZ, July 23 at 2:17 pm #
Unfortunately for Obama he doesn’t have a senate majority leader like LBJ who could make things happen. Reid is a real lightwieght and it is mystifying how he bacame senate majority leader. Pelosi looks strong enough on the house side and they also are more enlightened than their senatorial colleagues. It doesn’t help that Kennedy is seriously ill either. And of course health care reform has been an almost impossible task for all Democratic presidents, and a non-issue among Republican’s. So we American’s might have to get used to health insures like United Healthcare rake up obscene profits quarter after quarter in the name of free markets, while raising our health care premiums.
Report thisBy Hulk2008, July 23 at 2:03 pm #
Speaker Pelosi hinted that the August Break might be delayed - wouldn’t that be a joke? Imagine Congress actually sticking around until a serious problem is solved. Congress HAS health insurance - they don’t see it as a critical problem (to them). They “need” to go “home” and figure out how to, once more, put off any action. The Blue Dogs (pseudo-republicans) and Republicans just want to run out the clock until the mid-term elections ... because they figure there’s nothing to lose: either they delay reform or kill it off with a new wave of conservative newcomers.
Report thisOrrin Hatch (R, Utah) withdrew from negotiations because he is dead-set against mandatory health insurance either for individuals or businesses .... even though auto insurance IS mandatory in most states. ANY excuse to slow down .... delay .... obfuscate.
By Paul Greenhalgh, July 23 at 1:30 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Not to stick a rod in a bee hive here or anything.
Or to offend or upset anyone, I’m just waying in with some arm chair heart felt thoughts.
I live in Canada. I pay approximately $31.00 dollars per month for my Health Care plan via my work place. Or in other words the Canadian Universal Health care card. For the most part it’s fantastic that I can go and see a doctor, hospital or emergency ward and just produce that card and I’m worry and financial free. Absolutely no cost to me whatsoever because we all contribute to the health care plan as Canadians. And there’s only 30 million of us, so if we can do it why can’t the United States??
Granted it’s not a fool proof system. There are lag times for the more serious cases I’ll grant you that. But for the most part in my 51 years of life I haven’t had to wait for the regular checkups, doctor’s visits or what have you. I don’t plan on having anything serious happen for a few more years yet! *knockin on wood*
Here’s what concerns me about your system albeit this is only one example;
A friend of ours married a fantastic American Gent, and she moved across the line to start a family. Thankfully though she had duel citizenship when during her pregnancy she found out it would cost 25,000 dollars for a 24 hour hospital visit to have her baby.
YIKES! I mean I love you guy’s and all…but how in blazes can you afford this kind of thing? How???
Our friend, fortunately came back across the line as she kept her health care plan updated and current.. she had her baby virtually for free! I did cost her gas money after all but that’s it!
Now I’m just an ordinary regular working stiff, but it just makes sense to me that there are what? 260 million Americans in the U.S compared to our 30+?
And this may be severely simplified but if every citizen contributed 30 or 50 dollars a month to a universal health plan under one roof. Where each citizen is basically contributing to the health care of his neighbor as well as themselves, that the costs of doing business would go down for everyone.
Yes I could be talking out the side of my head. And I do realize that this would cause complications for those who are in the business of making copious amounts of money by gouging the General public. But so be it…without you they wouldn’t profit like they have been in the first place. I think and this is just my humble opinion, but I think the American people need to take the power back from those who really don’t care about your health, they’re more interested in your wallet.
If life is so precious and an oath has been taken to preserve life. Then why is it they’re turning people away who don’t have the insurance to cover the cost of doing business? That’s nuts folks…I really don’t know how you do it. And I truly feel for you and worry about you. It boggles the mind.
It just doesn’t make sense that with the greatness of the United States that Health Care isn’t there for everyone. For the people that are the backbone of that great nation of yours.
Ok I really have no opinion and I have no right to talke about your current system, I don’t know how it all works. All I know is that it would scare the living hell out of me. I’ll be honest here, I’m just hoping that something is put in place that benefits every American Citizen and eases the financial burden and devastation that the current system would incur upon you.
My heart felt wishes of good will to you all in this confusing time. I wish you all great health! And again I don’t mean to offend or upset anyone. I just care about my brothers and sisters south of the 49th is all.
Good luck with this…
Report thisBy FreeWill, July 23 at 12:03 pm #
Marie, you are like an ant walking on an elephant saying it sure is rough going but we seem to be getting some where. Not however, realizing it on an Elephant going backward.
Report thisBill HR 3200 is a sick elephant concocted by the insurance and drug interest and has nothing to do with creating affordable, accessible health care for all. In fact, it actually will (if past ) kill any chance of having that happen. That’ is it’s prime objective.
Obama has privately met with 27 or more Corporate Health Executives just prior to the forming of this bill. It took a freedom of information challenge to even find out this. Some transparency eh? Yet he and the Democratic committees flatly refuse to meet with leader who wish to talk about a Universal Single Payer System.
Our representatives are like Addicts. Only their “drug” is the money flowing from the Corporate lobbies. Until we are able to get them “clean” they will, just like drug addicts say or do anything to get their fix from their Corporate dealers.
We desperately need a Universal Single Payer Health Care System. But, in order to get it we need a dramatic change in the way Washington works. Ironical this is what this administration had promised. Like I said say anything do anything to get their fix!
By William W. Wexler, July 23 at 11:07 am #
Fredric,
your sarcastic analogy might hold some water if medical care was something everyone needed 3 times a day so the production and distribution system of it was as vast and variable as the food production network. Same thing for housing.
Nice try, but no banana.
-Wexler
Report thisBy William W. Wexler, July 23 at 9:53 am #
The press conference last night was reminiscent of the press conferences that Bush had when he was working up to the Iraq invasion.
Polls show that Americans support a single payer public option. No questions about that. The biggest non-productive cost center in the healthcare system is profit. No questions about single payer. The question about transparency was ducked. There’s no transparency to this process; if it was transparent then why is single payer NEVER mentioned? Why is there no Congressional study of national health plans in other western countries? Why are single-payer advocacy groups excluded from deliberations and hearings?
The press is letting us down again. We have the potential through technology to be the most well-informed people in the history of the world. But in order to do that we would have to have a government that’s willing to work in the realm of reality and a press that has the integrity to ask the hard questions and demand the real answers.
We have neither of those, so the fantasy continues, it expands. One leading “progressive” commentator is telling us today that he thinks it’s a good idea that Obama made the issue of health care about HIMSELF last night. So we’re supposed to support a health care reform disaster because OBAMA says it’s a good deal? Come on, man, you know better than that.
Thank you for your article, MS Cocco, I wish you would have had a couple of questions and a follow-up last night.
-Wexler
Report thishttp://twitter.com/wwwexler
By Fredric Dennis Williams, July 23 at 9:19 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
I wonder if Marie has noticed a problem similar to health in the delivery of food. She observes that the current “convoluted medical payment systems . . . breed inefficiency and raise costs”—wouldn’t it be equally critical to do the same for the convoluted purchasing of food? Clearly a government agency could deliver food to us more efficiently and cheaply than the current host of supermarket chains, local farmers’ markets, convenience stores and the like. Once government has rationalized feeding us, those who are obese will be cured and our politicians can move on to fixing housing. Obviously having so many landlords and builders and mortgage lenders cannot be effcient. This convoluted system could be replaced by a single government agency dedicated to efficiency and to less costly housing.
I’m sure we will all be much better off with the cost controls that Marie observes aren’t delivered through “market ‘magic’”. Let us have the transparent hand of government everywhere, so that utopia may begin.
Report this