|
|||
|
The Silent Education CrisisPosted on Jul 15, 2009It’s the silent education crisis, the one we don’t talk about much because its existence undermines the story we like to tell about our country. The problems we face from kindergarten to 12th grade get regular, if still insufficient, attention. But we rarely confront how badly we’re faring when it comes to educating our people after high school. That silent education crisis belies our claim that no nation comes close to us in guaranteeing that anyone can work hard, get a great education, and soar. Judge Sonia Sotomayor honored this national article of faith in a lovely tribute to her mother at her confirmation hearings. “She taught us that the key to success in America is a good education,” Sotomayor said. “And she set the example, studying alongside my brother and me at our kitchen table so that she could become a registered nurse.” In telling this story of intergenerational mobility, Sotomayor was describing how our education system is supposed to work—and, inadvertently perhaps, pointed to how it’s failing so many now. College and law school got Sotomayor to where she was this week, and we once did reasonably well in opening educational opportunities to people from modest backgrounds such as hers. Advertisement Her mother’s quest to better her own and her family’s lot through more schooling was also classic, and we’re falling behind when it comes to opportunities of that sort, too. Today, the United States stands 10th in the percentage of 25- to 34-year-olds who have earned a postsecondary degree. We’re behind Canada, Japan, South Korea, New Zealand, Belgium, Ireland, Norway, Denmark and France. The information I’ve just offered comes from an important article by Andrew Delbanco, a professor at Columbia University, published this spring in The New York Review of Books. Delbanco concludes that “a great many gifted and motivated young people are excluded from college for no other reason than their inability to pay, and we have failed seriously to confront the problem.” To bolster his point, Delbanco cites the remarkable finding of Donald E. Heller, the director of Penn State’s Center for the Study of Higher Education, that “the college-going rates of the highest-socioeconomic-status students with the lowest achievement levels is the same level as the poorest students with the highest achievement levels.” I added the italics to underscore the not-so-hidden injuries of class. To read Delbanco’s article and hear Sotomayor’s personal story is to understand why President Obama went to Michigan on Tuesday to announce a plan to spend $12 billion over 10 years to strengthen our community colleges and “help an additional 5 million Americans earn degrees and certificates in the next decade.” It was good to hear a president say that community colleges are “an undervalued asset in our country ... treated like the stepchild of the higher education system.” He was also correct to emphasize how much upward mobility still depends on education, since “jobs requiring at least an associate degree are projected to grow twice as fast as jobs requiring no college experience.” But his proposal should be seen only as a first step. It’s a $1.2 billion annual down payment to solve an enormous problem. The community colleges are in crisis because they are being flooded with students who cannot afford four-year schools, and also with unemployed workers seeking training for new jobs. Moreover, many Americans will find secure and well-paying employment not by way of a college degree but by receiving training after high school for what economists Harry Holzer and Robert Lerman call “middle-skill jobs.” In a report for The Workforce Alliance, Holzer and Lerman argued that both high-skill and service job openings will be outnumbered in coming years by middle-skill opportunities in health care, construction, installation, repair and many other fields. A single year of postsecondary education, especially in programs linked directly to employers’ needs, can do wonders in helping job seekers gain their footing on the mobility ladder. Obama is on the right track. But we’ll need to do much more than he’s proposing if we want the story of Sonia Sotomayor and her mom to define a realistic aspiration for the next American generation. E.J. Dionne’s e-mail address is ejdionne(at)washpost.com. © 2009, Washington Post Writers Group CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By Steppin' Razor, July 24, 2009 at 11:02 am Link to this comment
Steve Wimer says:
“...let’s face it, many people are just too plain dumb to matriculate.
Oh man, give that a rest. Most people are not as dumb as you think. The problem is that because of the attack on labor the jobs that pay a good wage are for college educated people. People chase the money because of this. I say raise the wages of the labor/working class. Educate these people through trade schools and Unions. They are not dumb, they just have different talents which are in demand but our society just will not pay for these talents like they should pay and many of look down on the working labor class.
“It’s a waste of money to send people like this to college.”
Maybe, but college has been sold as the only way to have a middle class living standard. I don’t blame people for chasing the dream.
“It’s also dumb to let people using drugs enroll in classes supported with tax dollars.”
BS! I can’t number the people who are at the top and they used many drugs while in college. What would you do to enforce your view?? Piss Test them randomly?? Could I by chance direct you to Freak Republic?? They are with you on this measure. I don’t want a police society no matter why you think this would be good for Amerika.
But wait, that is a way to keep the working class kids OUT. Kool-right?
“Instead, many should be pointed towards trade schools in professions, in demand, paying a living wage.”
OK, sounds good. How about tax support for these schools. Tax the rich to support them.
BTW, FYI trades are not referred to as professions. That is the class bias that is causing the problem. Trades are trades and the next time you have a plumber fix your plumbing you need to think about what IF they didn’t know the trade and how much you really would pay to have that backed up plumbing fixed. Unions were formed to tackle class bias. Many don’t like that. You can’t have that working class scum making a good living and allowing freedom of class mobility and opportunity for their children. Keep the working class in their place and leave colleges uncrowded and open for the educated/privileged class. Competition from the Proles might mean Junior might not get in to that college.
Are you one of those people?
One of the things that scared the elite was the working class kids were offering stiff competition at the colleges. I saw it in the 60’s-70’s as more and more working class kids got to go to college. Can’t have that now.
We need classes in society and they should not mix. Unless they are hired help and they are fixing your plumbing. LOL!!!
Report thisBy Steppin' Razor, July 24, 2009 at 10:16 am Link to this comment
“The ruling class did this to us because we got “uppity” in the 1960s and they decided they’d send us back into pre-New Deal America. Keep us underemployed and ignorant and they succeeded, because people are lazy, and our rulers are scum.”
Your analysis is spot on but I really think we are not lazy. We have been progandized to such an extent that most are confused and misdirected. This will pass. Trust me. More and more people will wake up to the scam and then?? I expect repression at some point. That is why armies of Mercenaries have been formed and are being used here and overseas. The elite knows it can’t trust The People to suppress The People reliably and for very long. Look for more gun control by the ruling elite. Tune out our leftist allies(?) who call for gun control. They may mean well or NOT but this is our last redoubt. Iraq is ungovernable by foriegners because of the guns in civilian hands. Do Not be persuaded otherwise. They will try. Who can war against the Beast. They would like you to think they are all powerful but they are not. Be Patient, this will get very bad before it gets better.
Report thisBy Anarcissie, July 18, 2009 at 5:22 am Link to this comment
The price of education has risen faster than inflation because education is a semi-monopoly. Its product is irrational—a credential rather than competence—which reflects its nature as a class filter. Like the medical system, it has an impressive power to propagandize, and so many people confuse education with knowledge or competence. The confusion is fact more extensive among liberals and leftists, supposedly critical thinkers, than among the right-wing and conservative. Under these circumstances education’s practitioners have more power to raise their prices than, say, plumbers or purveyors of hot dogs, and so they do.
Report thisBy hippie4ever, July 17, 2009 at 6:03 pm Link to this comment
The cost of higher education has soared far beyond inflationary pressures. Administrators bleed the system dry, and professors resist salary cuts and leave the work to the underpaid T.A.s. Worse, though, are the cost for textbooks. A student can easily spend $1,000 per semester in texts, workbooks, CD-ROM/DVD, and laptops are mandatory. Add parking, tuition, fees, it is not affordable to the average person anymore.
The ruling class did this to us because we got “uppity” in the 1960s and they decided they’d send us back into pre-New Deal America. Keep us underemployed and ignorant and they succeeded, because people are lazy, and our rulers are scum.
I hope I live to see them fall from their abusive position of power. Unfortunately the people may not see what is in their interests and make a tragic decision; but what else is new?
Report thisBy Anarcissie, July 17, 2009 at 8:51 am Link to this comment
I hope you have some statistics or other hard evidence to back up the verbal abuse.
Report thisBy felicity, July 17, 2009 at 6:04 am Link to this comment
michaelsd - and then of course there’s Bill Gates who lobbied Congress to relax visa restrictions for ‘imported’ techies. It worked, to the delight of Bill, because a ‘foreign’ techie is paid about $12,000/year less than a home-grown one.
Report thisBy Steve Wimer, July 17, 2009 at 5:40 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The problem with our educational system is not a rote learning method in a 21st century world. It’s we’ve forgotten the basics. Before education can sink in, students need discipline and motivation. Once those hurdles are overcome, the interesting lesson plans—discussion groups, internet instruction with visuals, graphics, and sounds appealing to different modalities and learning styles can be effective. Let’s also not forget that not everyone can do advanced work. let’s face it, many people are just too plain dumb to matriculate. It’s a waste of money to send people like this to college. It’s also dumb to let people using drugs enroll in classes supported with tax dollars. Instead, many should be pointed towards trade schools in professions, in demand, paying a living wage. Today’s system is producing dysfunctional young adults, welfare leeches, and drug addicts. We all suffer from the results.
Report thisBy Trailing Begonia, July 17, 2009 at 4:55 am Link to this comment
We have a problem educating out young after high school? Well! Surprise, surprise…
I thought everybody was happy with the present arrangement: we the sheeple pay outrageous amounts of money to give our children a substandard education so that when they graduate, still dumb but in debt up to their eyebrows and unable to find a job, the banks can come after us and own our asses till the day we die. What exactly seems to be the problem with that?
Report thisBy dihey, July 17, 2009 at 4:02 am Link to this comment
President Obama gave a powerful speech, among others on education at the meeting of the NAACP.
During the years when I went to elementary and high schools I learned more about the world and culture outside school by playing and reading than I learned in school. Reading books has become a huge deficiency in our country. Instead our youngsters watch TV.
I believe that failing to address this deficiency was a major weakness of Obama’s speech. If you cannot afford to own books use the public library and skip homework. I had no homework in elementary school and only very little in high school. I have eventually become a professor at a good university.
There are several weaknesses in our educational system that were not addressed by Obama either. Consider what a toddler manages to “learn” by himself/herself between birth and kindergarten. Then, when the toddler enters kindergarten, it is decided that he/she is a moron that cannot learn/understand anything without the interference of the all-knowing teacher. This is a sure-fire way to kill curiosity. As long as we persist in this error our system will continue to fail except for the very intelligent/talented kids who will succeed in any system.
I am also concerned about the “early learning” method. Why overload the toddlers at a time when they need to master so many other things?
With regards to education after high school, Dionne has addressed a major issue, namely class discrimination. It has always existed to some degree in our post high school education. It is not new but is a growing and serious problem.
Report thisBy Fredric Dennis Williams, July 16, 2009 at 9:16 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Neither the article nor the comments seem to be very well informed, which suggests that the praise for more education may be seriously misplaced. Yes, we have added millions of students to colleges, and we have greatly increased funding of those colleges, and, naturally enough, colleges have increased prices rapidly to absorb the extra funding (much as the medical industry increased prices to absorb the medicare funding). But have we created a smarter or better informed population? No.
Those who are poorly educated and poorly informed are quick to see clear solutions to the problems that they don’t begin to understand. They find people to blame and, generally, conclude that the solution is more money.
Only fools think money solves a problem that is caused by a lack of intelligent management. When you turn more and more over to government, with its army of lawyers, lobbyists, contributors, and hangers-on, you assure bad management. We get the results we deserve—a very expensive, mediocre education which is designed to teach people to do as they are told, accept what they are given, repeat what those in authority say, and cause no disruptions.
Less would be better.
Report thisBy Anarcissie, July 16, 2009 at 5:36 pm Link to this comment
Capitalism as we know it is degenerating from consumer capitalism into finance capitalism. It is probably not capable of creating the sort of jobs for which a formal education was once the sure entrée.
As people lose corporate jobs, or fail to find them in the first place, they will become disconnected from the system and thus from bourgeois control. That might lead to a pre-revolutionary situation—not necessarily some violent upheaval, but a period in which consciousness and social relations change rapidly and profoundly, for better or worse.
Report thisBy michaelsd, July 16, 2009 at 2:45 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I’m not sure if the author is ignorant or lying. The problem isn’t a lack of education. The problem is that there are few jobs for educated people. Consider the facts -
The National Science Foundation tracks the number of degrees received in most majors up to 2006.
http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf08321/content.cfm?pub_id=3785&id=2
I took the average of 2001 thru 2006 and added it to 2007-2009. In the 21 st century, our universities have graduated 5 million scientists and engineers. About 650,000 people earned computer science dergees. These were supposed to be the high-tech jobs of the future that libertarians and free-market economists said would replace the lost manufacturing economy.
So how many jobs were added in these sectors in the 21st century? Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) payroll data provides the answer -
http://www.bls.gov/webapps/legacy/cesbtab1.htm
The data shows that only 63,000 jobs were added in the category “Architecture and Engineering”. (The BLS has no category for science). “Information” lost 871,000 jobs. “Computer Systems Design and Related” gained only 123,000 jobs. “Technical Consulting added 304,000 jobs, but most are contracts lasting a few months that require extensive experience in addition to a degree. Moreover, most are filled by chaeper foreigners brought in on work visas. The only sector with any real job growth that requires any education is Health Care.
The reason for this is globalization. Once manufacturing was outsourced, the occupations that serve it, like Science and Engineering, quickly followed it offshore.
There is nothing wrong with our post high school education system. People like Bill Gates lie about shortages and lack of education because it’s not in their best interest to admit that they want to replace their American workers with cheaper foreigners. The only shortage is of companies willing to hire our college graduates.
PS sorry for the long post!
Report thisBy Spiritgirl, July 16, 2009 at 2:42 pm Link to this comment
While I appreciate your article, you only point to half of the problem. Since the 1970’s when minorities started entering the “mainstream” public schools, slowly but surely funds have continued to be cut. States will say it is because teacher unions have such wonderful contracts - that’s a lie - most teachers really aren’t paid what they are worth! Not to mention that it takes dedication to ensure that other peoples children really learn! When states have budget shortfalls the first thing to be cut is education funds, which translate to larger classes and smaller curriculum or teaching to the tests! The truth is this is more about class in America. White people of privilege not wanting to tax themselves to pay for the education of everyone - this includes poor white people also! The truth is - many of our schools are using 19th century by rote teaching to students in a 21st century that is much more technically driven!
The fact that most kids in elementary and high school are not able to recognize geographical boundaries, are not scoring well in reading and mathematics - as evidenced by the numbers of people in remedial classes when they enter college is proof of this! Until and unless we as a society are honestly willing to face these issues - which are moral issues - we are only lying to ourselves and our children!
Report thisBy felicity, July 16, 2009 at 10:40 am Link to this comment
Hulk2008 beat me to it. Right on! (And, I’ve got to re-read the book “Dumbing Down of America.”)
A long time ago, Bill Mauldin laid out a prescription for Americans that is even more timely now than it was when he wrote it.
“We must peel back the veneer of hypocrisy and deception, stick pins in pompous windbags, puncture inflated egos, comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable, in a word carry on the fight for the little guy against greedy and vested interests, bigots and fakers, potential Caesars and mis-guided do-gooders.”
It’s only by way of his prescription that the present ills afflicting everything from our health-care non-system to our failing college/university system can be cured.
Report thisBy Anarcissie, July 16, 2009 at 10:03 am Link to this comment
I would not say that White ruling-class power was being threatened. In the 1970s, when Black and Hispanic people began to constitute a substantial portion of those entering tuition-free universities and colleges in New York and California, it suddenly turned out there wasn’t any money. That is, the mostly White electorate did not want to tax itself to fund the educations of any large number of non-White students. However, this was mostly an issue between different groups within the working and middle class; the ruling class wasn’t affected much and in fact many ruling-class types at least postured disapproval of the introduction of tuition charges in these schools. This is not to say that they were going to use up any political capital to fight the tribal prejudices of middle- and lower-class Whites, however.
Now, of course, we are in a situation where the White people, or rather their descendants, are being eaten by the same class-war monster their forbears let loose.
Report thisBy Hulk2008, July 16, 2009 at 9:04 am Link to this comment
Bottom-line: Rank and file US citizens do NOT value education. In fact, the Limbaugh-Hannity-Beck drones even put down highly educated people as “elites”. By contrast, immigrants seem to bring along with them an innate respect for learning - something that the far right has beaten out of those who have been in the US for more than one generation. Even the most destitute illegals want their kids to be well educated. Ironically the businesses and landowners who oppose spending on education have the MOST to lose in the long run. How many generations will pass while corporations and big agriculture run on the backs of poorly-educated “proseros”?
Report thisConservatives seem to have a DNA-based lack of foresight.
By Virginia777, July 16, 2009 at 8:12 am Link to this comment
““Her mother’s quest to better her own and her family’s lot through more schooling was also classic, and we’re falling behind when it comes to opportunities of that sort, too.”“
This is not true, from what I’ve witnessed in our public school systems today.
The new immigrants to this country ARE following the same path as Sotomayor, in large numbers (unheralded of course). They might not have as good of a funding path, but they are industrious and do find other ways to attend good colleges. In college, they chose careers that will lead to good jobs.
I think the main reason for the cuts to their education’s funding (public education has been a target of the Right for years and the MSM participates in this),
is because White power is being “threatened”,
it can’t stand to lose its top position/solo access to inner-circle resources/elitism.
But they are fighting a losing battle (good!!).
Report thisBy williamz, July 16, 2009 at 7:25 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Coming from a large lower-middle class family, I was told early in high school that the cost of college would be mine. Community and state colleges were highly recommended. However, I had extremely high hopes. Thus, I was thrilled when I was accepted into my #2 choice for school, as it was a particularly selective program. I was elated when I heard that I would be awarded enough scholarships and grants to make it affordable. I had to take out one very small federal loan to cover the difference. The program raised tuition for each incoming class and thus I was on track to earn my degree from a private university while racking up only $6,000.
Not six months into my first year we received a letter that our the level tuition was out; our tuition would be raised in the following year. They did not, however, raise my scholarships. Instead I lost grant money, I lost scholarships and each year the tuition continued to rise. My senior year my tuition was over $8,000 more than it was when I’d enrolled. My scholarships and grants were less than 66% of what I’d started with. I had $12,000 just in private loans my senior year, more in federal. Meanwhile, the university had essentially opened its’ liberal arts doors to anyone who didn’t need financial aid. Classes became more and more watered down, less and less challenging. More often than not, I’d walk in on the first day to a nervous Grad student behind the teacher’s desk, unsure of how to address us.
I now have a near $60k ball and chain that has forced me into a cubicle which I’d never dreamed of entering. The idea of interning my way into an ideal career became financial suicide.
I think back to the intial letter I received from the financial aid department and the pure joy I felt and seeing a golden ticket being hand to me and I don’t think I could ever do it differently. Something is terribly broken.
Report thisBy sabrina105, July 16, 2009 at 6:37 am Link to this comment
Our education system is yet another victim of unrestricted capitalism. Institutions have become private sector worker farms, teaching only by rote those things needed by business to make a profit. Research institutions have been turned into private sector R&D facilities (at least they want the research garnered from public expenditure) for the benefit of shareholders not of the public.
I doubt that many Business Colleges within higher education institutions have drastically altered there curricula since the Wall Street explosion of greed. Every other building on my local University campus is named after a banker. Same old thing - get your degree so you can make money doing as little as possible while taking from as many as possible.
Report thisBy coloradokarl, July 16, 2009 at 3:55 am Link to this comment
Back in about 1979 my cousin Deiter came to visit from Germany. He was here for a year and spent his days taking Agriculture classes at CU-Boulder and his nights dodging STDs. At 32 he was in his 14th year of the German higher education experience. The dumbing down of the American people is an ongoing method for growing shackles one link at a time with the MSM providing the lock and talk radio/TV/cable hiding the key. Personally, I cherish my High School drop-out status and feel my hard and productive work gets me closer to my next level in the ladder of spiritual growth. Our 11 year old wants to be an artist. PEACE, Love and Hope
Report thisBy Xntrk, July 16, 2009 at 1:36 am Link to this comment
This is a fairly brief excerpt from Eduardo Galeano’s Trilogy; Memories of Fire; Second Vol.; Faces and Masks:
The ideas of Simon Rodrigues*:
Teaching How To Think
The author is considered mad. Let him transmit his ravings to the fathers yet to be born.
Everyone must be educated without distinction of race or color. Let us not deceive ourselves: without popular education, there will be no true society.
Instruction is not education. Teach, and you will have people who know; educate. and you will have people who do.
To order recital from memory of what is not understood, is to make parrots. Do not in any case order a child to do anything that has no “why” at the foot of it. If you accustom the child always to see reason behind the orders he receives, he misses it when he does not see it, saying “Why?” Teach the children to be inquisitive, so that, asking the reasons for what they are told to do, they learn to obey reason, not authority like limited people, nor custom like stupid people.
Boys and girls should study together in school. First, so that in this way men should learn from childhood to respect women; second, so that women should learn not to be afraid of men.
The boys should learn the three principle trades: masonry, carpentry, and smithery, because the with earth, wood, and metal, the most essential things are made. Instruction and a trade should be given to women, so that they will not prostitute themselves out of necessity, nor make marriage a speculation to assure subsistence.
He who knows nothing can be deceived by anyone. He who has nothing, anyone can buy.
*Simon Rodriguez was Simon Bolivar’s teacher. After 25 years in Europe, he returned to America. Bolivar made him director of education in the new country of Bolivia. He opened a model school in Chuquisaca in 1826. Neither he nor Bolivar remained in power long.
I strongly recommend this Trilogy of American History. Like this excerpt, it is collection of events in both North and South America and the Caribbean, starting in 1492 till the 20th Century [I’m still in Book 2].
The reason I posted this is out of curiosity. Would this work today? I believe teaching people to think is mandatory, and we are failing at every step. As we dumb down education our schools produce nothing but automatons. Sure, they do better in fast food joints and sweat shops, but the unemployed quickly fall into crime, drugs, and pandering, as they know nothing, and can do nothing.
Report this