LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 25, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Three Questions Left Unanswered by Obama’s Counterterrorism Speech

Colbert Slams PBS for Appeasing Koch Brothers

'Left, Right & Center': Obama Ends the War on Terror

How to Make a Million Dollars an Hour

Marching in Chicago: Resisting Rahm Emanuel’s Neoliberal Savagery

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * New York City’s Summers May Heat Up

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
A Call to Action
Act of Congress

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

Stains From the Bush Era Won’t Fade

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Jul 15, 2009

By Marie Cocco

    It is the damned spot that simply will not go out.

    The legacy of the Bush administration’s anti-terrorism tactics cannot be washed away in a tide of feel-good rhetoric about moving on, nor will it fade eventually if we apply President Barack Obama’s spiritual wisdom that this should be a time for “reflection, not retribution.”

    The revelation that CIA Director Leon Panetta killed a secret program reportedly aimed at assassinating top al-Qaida leaders, and quickly informed Congress of its existence, does not shock. It has long been a presidential aim to decapitate the terrorist network. Despite Republican claims that President Bill Clinton limply addressed terrorism as only a law enforcement problem, he had taken steps to allow what would have amounted to an in-the-field execution of Osama bin Laden, according to the 9/11 commission.

    The peril is not in what Congress and the public already know about President George W. Bush’s clandestine plans, but in what we do not know. That Vice President Dick Cheney was deeply involved, and may have been behind the extraordinary level of secrecy applied to the program, deepens the dread.

    In just the past few days, other lights have been blinking red.

Advertisement

    Attorney General Eric Holder has been doggedly, and correctly, pursuing investigative leads in the use of torture against terrorism detainees. Holder may prosecute some who went beyond even the shockingly permissive and almost certainly illegal guidelines cooked up as justification by Bush administration lawyers.

    Far too many in official Washington see prosecution as a political distraction, and an incendiary one. But this is itself a measure of how thoroughly our moral compass has been shattered. It is Holder’s duty to prosecute those who have broken the law. Political calculation, even one that helps the president who appointed him, should not be the decisive factor.

    Less bloody than the gruesome details of torture that are likely to come to light in any prosecution are the latest hints that the Bush administration’s warrantless surveillance program was far more extensive than what has been revealed. This came in a report from the independent inspectors general of the five agencies that have had some involvement in the surveillance, or in use of the information culled from it.

    The details of the “other intelligence activities” undertaken through the presidential directives that allowed the surveillance remain “highly classified,” the inspectors say. They note the surveillance involved “unprecedented collection activities” and cautioned that the retention and use of this material should be “carefully monitored.”

    Who and what were swept up in this vast net remain unknown. What we know, thanks to the report, is that the information has been kept in the bowels of the operation—for who knows what purpose.

    The more the attorney general, Congress and independent investigators look back at what defenders of the Bush administration claim is already well-trod ground, the more rocks they turn over and the more contaminated soil is revealed. The Obama administration has good reason to want to avert its eyes. It is true that in a tit-for-tat era, any effort to hold accountable the lawbreakers of the past will be spun as political justification for failure to move forward with important legislation on such crucial issues as energy and health care.

    This is another big lie.

    Congressional Republicans aren’t cooperating with Obama’s agenda in the first place. Deep differences among Democrats have slowed progress on many issues. If little or nothing gets done in the coming months, it will not be because those cranky civil libertarians, human rights activists and the few members of Congress bold enough to side with them have derailed the president’s agenda.

    The means to some measure of accountability already is at hand in legislation for a “truth commission,” such as that sponsored by House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers of Michigan. It would have been easy for the White House to allow this, and a similar Senate measure, to move forward without much ado. Instead, it has told Capitol Hill it wants the idea squashed.

    But the trap the White House set for itself has now sprung. Having declared that it would not look back in anger or even with the intent of holding wrongdoers accountable, it is now haunted week after week by new revelations. They are signs that some have a conscience that cannot be stilled.

    Marie Cocco’s e-mail address is mariecocco(at)washpost.com.

    © 2009, Washington Post Writers Group


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By daRaL, December 29, 2009 at 12:13 am Link to this comment

Oh, and what do you suppose Obambi has planned for the “secret” US military bases built in Iraq? Did he say that those bases would be handed over to the Iraqis? If so, I never heard that promise….. cep telefonu

Report this

By daRaL, December 29, 2009 at 12:13 am Link to this comment

Oh, and what do you suppose Obambi has planned for the “secret” US military bases built in Iraq? Did he say that those bases would be handed over to the Iraqis? If so, I never heard that promise…..

Report this

By Jean Gerard, July 17, 2009 at 1:10 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Consider this:  It wasn’t just the Bush years that put the country on the moral and financial skids. Greed, fear, and Wall Street influence on Washington goes back farther than that. The prosecution of Bush/Cheney etc. offers an “easy out” by punishing some individuals who can be proven to deserve it. Though that might satisfy a plea for some kind of justice, it would do little to bring deeper changes.  Bush/Cheney etc. took advantage of greed, fear and corporate/military influence to foster war and injustice. Has habeas corpus been restored?  Is the paranoid machinery of surveillance any less imperial”?  Is the “military-industrial complex any less powerful?  Are these things more, or less, important than a few criminal prosecutions?

Report this

By David, July 17, 2009 at 12:49 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Bottom line:  The Unitary Executive says NO!  NO hearings, NO investigations, NO prosecutions.  The Unitary Executive has spoken.  These ‘crimes’ are now the law of the land.  Welcome to the Police States of America.

p.s. I’d keep my head down if I were you, Marie.  That hit squad operates here too.

Report this
Night-Gaunt's avatar

By Night-Gaunt, July 17, 2009 at 10:55 am Link to this comment

I heard it was Benjamin Franklin who first said doing the same thing over again to get a different result is a sign of mental illness. [Insanity it a legal not psychiatric term.]

Remember that ‘combat troops’ is just a designation and all the other soldiers that will remain, as little as 50,000 will also be combat but under another name. Just like the GWOT is now OSC but remains the same. A rose by any other name…still smells sweet and has thorns.  Magical thinking is when you are told to think of one thing, like torture, under another name like ‘enhanced interrogation’ would be different. Or calling shit and sewer waste as ‘bio-solids’ and then it is clean and okay to use. Magical thinking is rampant. People need to stop being fooled by name changes.

How good is it for Machiavelli to be a scholar of the US constitution? Or the Bad Seed with the face of an ‘angel’ and the heart of a psychopath be the leader of a nation? Part of a Cabal of the same types who wish to turn the republic into an empire? Remember the parable of Star Wars and the Sith? It is more than just spaceships and aliens an blasters in that series. Look at it again in light of our world and how things function. Don’t be fooled by appearances. Don’t judge a book by its cover but its contents and actions.

You do know that Obama is breaking the treaty and therefor the law and Constitution of the USA by not pursuing war criminals here, covering it up, and wanting to go beyond it. One can’t without investigating, prosecuting and incarcerating the criminals involved. Obama is an aider and abettor at this time of war criminals which makes him one too. Not even counting the continuing war crimes in occupied Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. [And maybe Iran too.]

Report this
tropicgirl's avatar

By tropicgirl, July 17, 2009 at 10:32 am Link to this comment

“The Obama administration has good reason to want to avert its eyes…”

The Obama admin is not just averting its eyes. Nice try. He is entrenching the Bush crimes. Entrenching. Making permanent. Got it?

Why don’t you discuss that? I’m sick of hearing about Bush. We did our job now Chump Change needs to do his. I’m still waiting.

Report this

By Tim, July 17, 2009 at 6:16 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

How many ‘Truth Commissions’ have we had in the past and what was the outcome? No one gets prosecuted. This is a perception control tactic that wastes our money and can’t get to the heart of a really broken system of government.

Report this

By NorCalNative, July 16, 2009 at 4:02 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Just for the sake of argument, lets say that Republicans and the establishment media get their way and they are able to derail investigations of war crimes.

Is this simply the gateway to Health Care reform and a shiny and profitable new economy?  Or is it something more subversive to Democracy itself?

What I’m not hearing discussed in the media and/or blogs is what action or inaction means to the status and role of the office of President of the United States.  I would claim that not investigating means the executive branch is placed “ABOVE THE LAW.’

If the President can simply recruit an ideological crony from OLC to write him or her “permission slips” then that means the President has powers not envisioned in the Constitution, even during wartime.

At what point can the powers of the office of President be altered before representative Democracy and Republican rule are significantly changed?

We must carefully tread in areas where political expediency has the same result as giving extra-Constitutional powers to the Presidency. 

To call this a partisan issue is a smoke-screen.

Report this

By Mary Ann McNeely, July 16, 2009 at 1:12 pm Link to this comment

. . . Obama’s spiritual wisdom that this should be a time for “reflection, not retribution.”

Justice is not retribution.  And this man used to teach constitutional law?

Report this
Paul_GA's avatar

By Paul_GA, July 16, 2009 at 8:04 am Link to this comment

Makes one wonder why folks keep voting for Repubs or Demos—and expecting that THIS time, there’ll be real “change we can believe in” ...

I believe it was Santayana who said that insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result every time. By his standards, the present-day USA is a madhouse.

Report this

By Rodger Lemonde, July 16, 2009 at 7:38 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Consider that possibly the problem is that the barrel is contaminated so that the replacement of all the apples so there won’t be any “bad” apples won’t work?
If we don’t sterilize the barrel new instances of “bad” apples will continue forever.

Report this

By SamSnedegar, July 16, 2009 at 5:08 am Link to this comment

lies upon lies upon lies . . .

When have you heard the Obambi forces mention OIL?

So they too are liars who prefer hiding the truth for reasons unknown. Perhaps they don’t like admitting to lying, coveting, killing, and stealing? Perhaps they don’t want to suggest that the USA might be broke and needs mideast oil to recover from a deep depression? Perhaps they don’t want the global recession/depression that might result from the USA telling the truth for a change?

Come to think of it, I’ve never heard YOU mention oil, Coco. I did hear Scheer back before he got fired for it, but none of the rest of the so-called truth diggers hereabouts made my all star list of “tell it like it is” reporters.

Oh, and what do you suppose Obambi has planned for the “secret” US military bases built in Iraq? Did he say that those bases would be handed over to the Iraqis? If so, I never heard that promise…..

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.