![]() |
![]() |
||
|
Don’t Cry for Me, AlaskaPosted on Jul 7, 2009What can you say about a public official who ridicules those who would take the “quitter’s way out”—as she faces reporters to announce that she’s quitting? A governor who claims that “the worthless, easy path” would be to serve out the remaining 18 months of her term? An ambitious politician who says that “life is too short” to worry about, you know, boring things such as responsibility or duty? You can say that all of us who ever took Sarah Palin seriously—or pretended to take her seriously—should be deeply ashamed. And you can say that John McCain should publicly apologize for putting the nation he loves at risk by choosing Palin as his running mate. Imagining Palin within a heartbeat of the presidency should be enough to make even die-hard Republicans shudder. The reasons she gave for stepping down are not just contrived or implausible but literally nonsensical. She can most effectively serve the people of Alaska by ceasing to exercise the powers of chief executive? She worries that as a lame duck she would somehow be compelled to waste taxpayer money on useless junkets? In her “Don’t Cry for Me, Alaska” news conference announcing her departure, the folksy non sequiturs—“Only dead fish go with the flow”—were like nuggets of Cartesian logic amid a tub of mush. But I’m stating the obvious. The thing is, Palin’s unsuitability for high public office has been obvious all along. Tina Fey got it right; the rest of us were far too reluctant to state plainly that the emperor, or empress, had no clothes. There are basically two reasons why the political class and the commentariat continue to speak and write about Palin as if she were a substantial figure whose presence on the national stage is anything but a cruel, unfunny joke. The first is fear—not of Palin and her know-nothing legions, but of being painted as elitist and sexist. From the beginning, Palin has been a master at maneuvering her critics into this trap. Like most Americans, she didn’t go to an Ivy League school; like most women, she deals every day with the challenges of juggling work and family. She highlighted these aspects of her biography, then used them to portray herself as a victim whenever anyone had the temerity to criticize anything she said or did. The most recent illustration is what she posted on her Facebook page last weekend on the reaction to her announced resignation:“How sad that Washington and the media will never understand; it’s about country. And though it’s honorable for countless others to leave their positions for a higher calling and without finishing a term, of course we know by now, for some reason a different standard applies for the decisions I make.” What is she talking about? Who are these “countless others” who supposedly have made the same decision to abandon governorships for no credible reason? The names don’t come rushing to mind. Why is any criticism of Poor Little Sarah the result of the “different standard” that mean old “Washington and the media” always apply? Because blaming her favorite alleged persecutors allows her to ignore the bewildered reaction from her constituents in Alaska who are stunned and mystified at her decision to skip out. The other reason why Palin is taken more seriously than she deserves is that she has a constituency. Heaven help us. Palin has far-right conservative views, and while I disagree with her on almost everything, there’s certainly nothing inappropriate or illegitimate about her philosophy. But I feel sorry for conservatives who look to her as a champion, because she’s going to let them down. Articulating a political vision and inspiring people to believe in it are true accomplishments, and no one can take that away from her. But realizing that vision through legislation or executive action requires discipline, persistence and rigor. To return to stating the obvious, these are attributes that Palin lacks. Anyone tempted to see her resignation gambit as a masterstroke, positioning her for a presidential run in 2012, is riding for a fall. She will flake out. Sarah Palin is by nature more of a firebrand opinion-maker than anything else. I know one when I see one. She can deny it all she wants, but really she’s—gulp—one of us. Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By RobertinWestbury, July 12 at 2:27 pm #
” I forsee her piddling legal bills soon handled by six figure speaking fees and a likely “Sarah Palin Show” on Fox opposite Rachel Maddow.”
Maddow is brilliant. I’d love to see Sarah as a guest on her show…
Palin is a nut. And those who believe in her and follow her are nuts.
I hope she does run in 2012. I’d rather see President Obama re-elected than any Republican possibility today. She’d ensure his re-election. He’d have a harder time of it running against Romney I think… Palin would ensure him a landslide victory.
Report thisBy JFoster2k, July 9 at 4:46 pm #
Thank you Eugene. You are right on the mark once again.
Like many other reasonably intelligent people, I saw Palin for the moronic ideologue she is in the first few minutes of her media exposure after being tapped. Also, like many others, I didn’t want to jump to immediate conclusions, but every interview or speach she gave simply revealed more ineptitude.
For the first time in my life I actually got on the phone with all my conservative friends and family members and begged them, if they weren’t going to vote for Obama, to not vote at all… PLEASE don’t let that crazy MILF near the White House!
As time went on and it became clear to most of us that we were right all along, it also became startling to see how many defenders rallied to her. Knowing those people are out there right now operating heavy machinery and “clinging to their guns and religion” sends chills up my spine like a cold Alaskan wind(bag).
Report thisBy catlady628, July 8 at 9:16 pm #
I expect to see her on the Fix News Network,where she and that flea circus she calls a brain, will fit right in…
Report thisBy hippie4ever, July 8 at 4:00 pm #
I suspect Sarah is planning to become a Faux news “personality.” The job’s perfect for her—she can say any ignorant, idiotic thing in the world and get away with it. This job offers more than the Alaskan governorship insofar as she could wear expensive clothing and accessories EVERY DAY and NOT have to give them back. Even better, her war paint would be applied by professionals and she’s be on TV every day…you betcha! Her critics? Faux could provide Sarah with their playbook of excuses and attack rhetoric for all occasions.
She’ll be around to do damage but wouldn’t be working hard; her stream of stupidity will earn her millions and pivot another American fascist into high office.
Report thisBy BobZ, July 8 at 3:45 pm #
Altara,
“I think that she brings excitement and fun to a campaign.”
Yes she would, but that is hardly a reason for her to run for the highest office in the land. We had George W. Bush denigrate the office for eight years - we don’t need a female version of him to entertain us. We have already seen that act ad nauseum. Palin is not ready for prime time and never will be - she doesn’t want to do the hard work of governance, and she only wants to go around the country spouting off Republican right wing talking points that appeal to the extremist base but are irrelevant to the rest of the country. Republican’s need to attract candidates who actually think and can govern and do it effectively. We don’t need any more candidates who tell us how lousy government is and then we they get in office, prove it.
Report thisBy altara, July 8 at 1:15 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
PALIN IN 2012
For presidential aspirations in 2012, South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford is toast. The man Maureen Dowd refers to as the tango dancing alter ego, Marco, cheated on his wife, left his state untended and lied about his whereabouts and then followed all this with sappy, almost lovelorn, statements and interviews. It would take a long time, if ever, to forget and forgive this behavior.
Alaskan Governor Sarah Palin is no stranger to sappy statements and odd behavior. In a rambling announcement containing strange references to such things as basketball point guards, she tried to explain her decision to resign as governor later this month. Among the reasons, if they can be called that, she gave was that, as a lame duck, she would be just spinning her wheels. If that were true, maybe all lame duck officials should resign.
Her resignation may well not be a wise decision. However, she does not leave Alaska untended and she is right that her national prominence and media attention does serve as a distraction to Alaskan governance. Better she should have then just said that she wanted to devote her time and attention to the pressing issues facing our nation. Then she could give the speeches, do her much needed policy homework, and raise the money she needs for herself and any future campaign.
And I hope that she does campaign in 2012. Much as I disagree with her unacceptable views on women’s reproductive rights, gay marriage, sex education, and fiscal policy, I think that she brings excitement and fun to a campaign. I do think she will run if for no other reason than RNC Chairman’s statement that she can’t.
I would so much look forward to the debates. “Governor, may I call you Sarah?”
homer http://www.altara.blogspot.com
Report thisBy mill, July 8 at 12:49 am #
Her stream-of-conscious speechifying seems to attract and entertain her core supports and would-be suitors. But there’s no coherence, no consistency, no policy depth. Will that change going forward? Why would it?
Report thisBy William W. Wexler, July 7 at 10:30 pm #
Actually, I think there has been reverse sexism at play here. Any man who was as inarticulate and uninformed as Palin wouldn’t have had a chance in hell at becoming President or even Governor.
Oh… I forgot about Bush.
Never mind.
Report thisBy SteveL, July 7 at 7:16 pm #
Amazing with all the problems in the world Silly Sara somehow manages to get top billing. Did it ever occur to anyone this half-wit would be best ignored? Consider this, if McCain had put Charlie Crist on the ticket, McCain would have won Florida and lot more states would have been in play. The Democrats just need to send Palin a thank you note and the rest of us just need to say “goodbye”.
Report thisBy godistwaddle, July 7 at 6:46 pm #
The only good republican i ever saw was dead. Still, palin is awfully good for a laugh.
Report thisBy samosamo, July 7 at 3:46 pm #
““Palin has far-right conservative views, and while I disagree with her on almost everything, there’s certainly nothing inappropriate or illegitimate about her philosophy. But I feel sorry for conservatives who look to her as a champion, because she’s going to let them down.”“
****************************************************
Oh, you mean letting them/us down much like a certain ‘new’ president has let us down with his totally disclosed method of retaining the previous administration’s agendas instead of the ones he campaigned on for his position of power?
Report thisBy gary r, July 7 at 1:51 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Today Palin admitted that, essentially, the exhaustion and exasperation and slight legal cost she has borne after fending off several ethics inquiries were the reason she quit. So, a sitting Governor was ousted because of the stress and strain of ethics inquiries! What a novel way to oust a governor! Amusingly, she trips over her own logic, because, as she is fond of pointing out, none of these inquiries found any wrongdoing on her part. So as a top government executive, her response to being pressed by ethics questions which she apparently successfully defended was…to quit? Balderdash! Perhaps she hopes it will parallel Richard Nixon’s “You won’t have Richard Nixon to kick around anymore” moment, six years before he was elected President.
Report thisI don’t think so. I forsee her piddling legal bills soon handled by six figure speaking fees and a likely “Sarah Palin Show” on Fox opposite Rachel Maddow. Then her career will more closely parallel “Lonesome Rhodes” in Kazan’s classic “A Face in the Crowd.”
By BobZ, July 7 at 1:37 pm #
Eugene,
While the media may have been reluctant to call out Sarah Palin as not ready for prime time, millions of American’s realized within weeks that McCain and the Republican’s had made a colossal mistake in judgement by nominating her. What had to be happening behind the scenes is that McCain with his gambling nature decided Palin was his only chance to really get the base behind him and pick up independents and Democrats unhappy with the nomination of Obama over Clinton. He failed in that assessment as Hillary supporters intensely disliked Palin and independents immediately saw the mediocrity of Palin. In the final analyis McCain only got the true believer vote, which he would have gotten anyway. Palin was a failed strategy except for the initial euphoria after the convention, before anybody really even knew who she was. What is maddening is that the media if anything was too kind to her, contrary to her protestations. Time after time, they kept giving her the benefit of a doubt and tried to explain away her deficiencies. They also failed to hammer her on her total lack of qualifications to be president - she was a part time mayor of a very small town in Alaska and a short time Governor of a state with a budget smaller than many American cities. There was also very little criticism of McCain for his Palin decision which reflected very poorly on him. Palin likes to claim victimhood, but the real victims here were all of us who would have had to suffer if somehow Palin ascended to the presidency.
Report thisBy Paul_GA, July 7 at 12:01 pm #
Anarcissie, I’m perfectly willing to take the chance that whatever replaces the Repubs might be worse than they are. When you’ve been lied to and led down a primrose path, politically speaking, all you want for the liars and hypocrites is their comeuppance.
Therefore, I remain unrepentant in my hope that the Repubs die swiftly of swallowing their own lies.
Report thisBy herewegoagain, July 7 at 11:16 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Anarcissie writes: “If the Republican Party disappears, something else will take its place, and it may not necessarily be better than the Republican Party.”
Yep, and we can expect this evolution (devolution, actually) to happen even sooner because the establishment wing of the Democratic Party has essentially morphed into the Republican party. It’s only natural that would push the latter to the absolute farthest right possible.
Report thisBy Anarcissie, July 7 at 10:42 am #
If the Republican Party disappears, something else will take its place, and it may not necessarily be better than the Republican Party.
I think the Republicans have a significant problem with the Religious Right, for example people like Palin. For many generations these people were on the Democrats’ plantation, but they were never allowed to come near taking over the party. After they had been sucked over to the Republican side by the Southern Strategy, people like Reagan and the Bushes were able to satisfy them with a dogbiscuit or two, like nominal opposition to abortion. Palin represents the real thing, although fortunately she does not seem to have sufficient character, fortitude or intellectual power to see the project of taking over the party and the country through. But there will be others.
Report thisBy paleriderpalehorse@yahoo.com, July 7 at 10:07 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
The country has already had 8 years of an undereducated President, one unwilling to do the hard work of finding out and acting on the truth. For George Bush the truth was what ever the voices in his head said they were. He had a pretend diploma and a pretend military service and a pretend patiotism and probably a pretend religousity.
The question is the country so far down the road of ignorance that a hyped, Know Nothing, just by being female and brazen has real chance of being a National politician? I sure hope not, we barely survived Bush and may in the long run not have survived him at all.
I have tried and tried to avoid one more of the over hyped news stories on tv and it is mostly impossible. Mike Jackson and Sarah Palin as if they were ever important except as bad examples.
Report thisBy Paul_GA, July 7 at 8:40 am #
How I hope that Palin’s career—and how it ends—is a sure sign of the Repubs’ demise as a viable political party.
“All political parties die at last of swallowing their own lies”—John Arbuthnot (1667 – 1735), Scottish physician, satirist and polymath.
Report thisBy godistwaddle, July 7 at 5:45 am #
Sluts and tramps (male and female) don’t have long attention spans. They flit from partner to partner. Palin’s a politics slut—flitting about, unable to commit. And, of course, you can lead a horticulture, but you can’t make her read.
Report this