![]() |
![]() |
||
|
Getting Old in the Land of IndependencePosted on Jul 1, 2009This is probably not the best week to air any reservations about the American passion for independence. After all, we don’t have fireworks for Dependence Day. We don’t hold parades to celebrate Interdependence Day. We don’t get a holiday for Connections. Our allegiance to independence as a nation is Yankee doodle dandy. But I’m wondering whether our ode to independence as a people is a bit over the top. We foster an unrealistic view of the way we live, not just in the designated years of caring for our children but in the undesignated years when we care for our elders. Maybe independence is too crisply defined as “exemption from reliance on, or control by, others; direction of one’s own affairs without interference.” This comes to mind because here in Massachusetts we have had five serious car accidents involving elders in the past month. An 86-year-old struck an elderly man in a crosswalk. A 93-year-old drove through the window of a Wal-Mart, injuring six people. An 89-year-old killed a 4-year-old child. Yes, I know. An octogenarian may be no greater a menace on the highway than a 35-year-old texting while driving. But the spate of accidents predictably prompted a call to require regular testing of everyone over 85. This in turn prompted one elder in a car-dependent suburb to lament, “It would ruin me. I’m so dependent on it. If I couldn’t drive I’d have to be dependent on someone else.” Advertisement As a society, and as individuals, we are woefully unprepared for aging, even when it’s our parents. We have 76 million baby boomers already entering their 60s. As one of them, Paula Span, says, “When my dad was my age both of his parents had died and he was retired. I’m never going to be able to retire and I might be caring for my dad when I’m in my 70s and he’s in his 90s.” Span has written “When the Time Comes,” a welcome “support group in print” for anyone with aging parents. She leads a compassionate and eyes-wide-open journey with families struggling to do the right thing from the car-key moment to hospice. About 34 million Americans provide at least some of the care for frail, aging family members, and yet we don’t see it as a normal, predictable part of the life cycle. As Span says with amazement, “We prepare for everything. We prepare for education, for marriage. We read 40 books on pregnancy and childbirth. But we don’t prepare for the idea that we’ll spend years taking care of an older relative.” Instead, we retain what she calls “this hazy idea that we’ll all be healthy for years and years and then just die.” There is no best-seller called “What To Expect When They Are Declining.” Nor is there any “Missing Manual” on what to do when our parents become too frail or confused to live alone. It always seems sudden when we get the call about the “accident” or the illness or the pot left on the stove. The concern around the car keys is a symbol of the denial shared by parents and adult children. But it’s also a template for talking about everything from assisted living to end-of-life care. These are the courageous conversations to initiate before “the time comes.” “Immortality is not on the menu,” says Span, “so let’s dispense with that and talk about what’s going to happen.” What inhibits us is not just the parent/child relationship but the belief that there is something shameful, improper and infantilizing about “help.” Our parents raised us to be independent. We raise our children under the same rubric. What we left out is the lesson that caregiving continues through the life cycle. Needing help is not role reversal but joint responsibility. We are bound to break through this reticence when the 76 million boomers start hitting 75. But all this is hitting this generation as adult children, a phrase that is no longer an oxymoron. Driving is not all that’s driving this. Sooner, not later, our country has to pass a reality road test on independence. Ellen Goodman’s e-mail address is ellengoodman1(at)me.com. © 2009, Washington Post Writers Group Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By okfalcon, July 2 at 1:17 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Friends of mine from other cultures often remark on Americans’ lack of care for one another, especially in families. The idea that children are to be gone from the family house at 18, or that we mustn’t need help but be independent each and all, or that parents should be relegated to nursing homes rather than “disrupt” their children’s nuclear familes: all of this is greeted with amazement, if not horror, from people for whom interdependence is a way of life—and sometimes a necessity of survival. My friends seem to see it as a coldness and selfishness in us. Given our frequent disparagement of the poor and needy, maybe they do have a point…
Report thisBy sharonsj, July 2 at 11:44 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
I am a senior citizen who lives alone in a rural area with no relatives and no public transportation. If I don’t get in the car and drive 40 miles, I won’t be able to get supplies or food. What do you suggest for people like me? I would love to sell my place and live in a city with buses and trains, but the economy sucks, mortgages are hard to get, and I probably couldn’t afford to live there on my Social Security. Unless you and the government can actually help people, shut up.
Report thisBy Rodger Lemonde, July 2 at 10:45 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
In many states drivers licenses are good for up to five years. So the state control is not very effective. Add to that a driver can go for many years without attracting police attention. Driving only requires keys and an automobile.
Report thisPersonally I drive at least 5 mph over the limit usually more at all times. Driving is such a habitual activity after 50 years of participateing that not being ‘allowed’ to would be a major blow to my self image. Not to mention my freedom of movement as I live twenty miles from anything.
By caia, July 2 at 2:11 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
While I agree with the overall gist of the article, I think this particular comparison is inapt. We set a minimum legal driving age because of a widespread understanding that children cannot drive safely. The exact age varies, and but there always is one, and the state always conducts a driving test to make sure a person knows how to drive. It doesn’t expect parents to have Talks with their ten-year-olds about how they’re Not Ready to take the SUV out for a spin yet.
Furthermore, this sentence implies some dereliction of duty on the part of the adult children for failing to have necessary discussions. While that’s certainly part of it, there are also people who should not be driving who simply refuse to give up driving no matter how reasonably it’s discussed. Taking the keys against their will, absent any legal authority, is at best coercion and at worst outright theft. Concerned children may do it anyway, but it’s not as simple as Goodman makes it sound.
Perhaps even more important, how are adult children supposed to know when their parent become dangerous drivers, unless an accident has already taken place? Unlike doctors or DMVs, they have no equipment or training to evaluate their elderly parents. Because the issue is often vision or reflexes, an elderly person can be entirely compos mentis, and still a danger on the road.
Report this