LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 22, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Lock Up Washington

Rise Up or Die

Revenge of the Bear: Russia Strikes Back in Syria

California Man Sues Officers He Says Nearly Beat Him to Death

The Promise of a Courageous Al-Jazeera America May Be Fading

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Lock Up Washington
Too Soon to Tell: The Case for Hope, Continued
Warming Climate Endangers U.K. Farming

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Act of Congress
Daily Rituals
The Girls of Atomic City

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

Undo the Coup

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Jun 30, 2009

By Amy Goodman

  The first coup d’etat in Central America in more than a quarter-century occurred last Sunday in Honduras. Honduran soldiers roused democratically elected President Manuel Zelaya from his bed and flew him into exile in Costa Rica. The coup, led by the Honduran Gen. Romeo Vasquez, has been condemned by the United States, the European Union, the United Nations, the Organization of American States and all of Honduras’ immediate national neighbors. Mass protests have erupted on the streets of Honduras, with reports that elements in the military loyal to Zelaya are rebelling against the coup.

  The United States has a long history of domination in the hemisphere. President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton can chart a new course, away from the dark days of military dictatorship, repression and murder. Obama indicated such a direction when he spoke in April at the Summit of the Americas: “[A]t times we sought to dictate our terms. But I pledge to you that we seek an equal partnership. There is no senior partner and junior partner in our relations.”

  Two who know well the history of dictated U.S. terms are Dr. Juan Almendares, a medical doctor and award-winning human rights activist in Honduras, and the American clergyman Father Roy Bourgeois, a priest who for years has fought to close the U.S. Army’s School of the Americas (SOA) at Fort Benning, Ga. Both men link the coup in Honduras to the SOA.

  The SOA, renamed in 2000 the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation (WHINSEC), is the U.S. military facility that trains Latin American soldiers. The SOA has trained more than 60,000 soldiers, many of whom have returned home and committed human rights abuses, torture, extrajudicial execution and massacres.

  Almendares, targeted by Honduran death squads and the military, has been the victim of that training. He talked to me from Tegucigalpa, the Honduran capital: “Most of this military have been trained by the School of America. ... They have been guardians of the multinational business from the United States or from other countries. ... The army in Honduras has links with very powerful people, very rich, wealthy people who keep the poverty in the country. We are occupied by your country.”

Advertisement

  Born in Louisiana, Bourgeois became a Catholic priest in 1972. He worked in Bolivia and was forced out by the (SOA-trained) dictator Gen. Hugo Banzer. The assassination of Archbishop Oscar Romero and the murders of four Catholic churchwomen in El Salvador in 1980 led him to protest where some of the killers were trained: Fort Benning’s SOA. After six Jesuit priests, their housekeeper and her daughter were murdered in El Salvador in 1989, Bourgeois founded SOA Watch and has built an international movement to close the SOA.

  Honduran coup leader Vasquez attended the SOA in 1976 and 1984. Air Force Gen. Luis Javier Prince Suazo, who also participated in the coup, was trained at the SOA in 1996.

  Bourgeois’ SOA Watch office is just yards from the Fort Benning gates. He has been frustrated in recent years by increased secrecy at SOA/WHINSEC. He told me: “They are trying to present the school as one of democracy and transparency, but we are not able to get the names of those trained here—for over five years. However, there was a little sign of hope when the U.S. House approved an amendment to the defense authorization bill last week that would force the school to release names and ranks of people who train here.” The amendment still has to make it through the House-Senate conference committee.

  Bourgeois speaks with the same urgency that he has for decades. His voice is well known at Fort Benning, where he was first arrested more than 25 years ago when he climbed a tree at night near the barracks of Salvadoran soldiers who were training there at the time.

  Bourgeois blasted a recording of the voice of Romero in his last address before he was assassinated. The archbishop was speaking directly to Salvadoran soldiers in his country: “In the name of God, in the name of this suffering people whose cry rises to heaven more loudly each day, I implore you, I beg you, I order you: Stop the repression.”

  Almost 30 years later, in a country bordering Romero’s El Salvador, the U.S. has a chance to change course and support the democratic institutions of Honduras. Undo the coup.

  Denis Moynihan contributed research to this column.

  Amy Goodman is the host of “Democracy Now!,” a daily international TV/radio news hour airing on more than 750 stations in North America. She is the co-author of “Standing Up to the Madness: Ordinary Heroes in Extraordinary Times,” recently released in paperback.

  © 2009 Amy Goodman

  Distributed by King Features Syndicate


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By Roberto, September 30, 2009 at 6:42 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Dear Amy

You write that Zelaya was democratically elected. I would like to urge you to
send one of your reporters to do a thorough investigation of the last election in
which Zelaya was “elected”, and you would be surprise of what you may find.
Go and investigate, It may help you understand the true story from the very
beginning.

Beginning… ... maybe you should ask that same reporter about the Crimen de
los Horcones and the critical role the Zelaya family palyed at the time.

I have respect for you Amy because you seek the truth, well it is time to seek
the truth about Mr. Zelaya

Best wishes.

Rob

Report this

By BillyHewitt, July 28, 2009 at 9:37 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

When Bush and Clinton mafias started the FTAA program in 1991 they outsourced my good paying jobs (4 separate manufacturing jobs in 12 years) to communist China and Mexico and Honduras. It did not benefit anyone except the multinational corporation owners whom made $BILLION profits. In Honduras the dictators agreed to sweetheart contracts with FTAA companies and forced 70% of the Honduran population into poverty and hunger. President Chavez was the only person that stood up to these gangsters and he has saved 3 million American good paying jobs by doing so. The neo cons and neo con media have all sworn to get Chavez so they can outsource 1 million more good American jobs to Honduras. If the military junta remains in Honduras 1 million American jobs will be outsourced to Honduras and the FTAA companies in America will become rich at the expense of the American worker and Honduran worker. It is essential that Honduras workers and American workers unite to stop these gangsters.

Report this

By Folktruther, July 18, 2009 at 10:19 pm Link to this comment

It’s not necessary for the US to invade anybody.  It largely owns Honduras.  The coup could not have occurred without Obama approval who is stalling until Zelaya’s term runs out. It is Obama’s first coup in Latin America, completed while he states publically that he is against returning to the ‘bad old days.’ 

Obama is now illegally funding the Homduras power structure when the law clearly states that the US must cut off funding in the event of a coup.

  In the US, if the president does it, that means its legal.  We are currently functioning under a lawless police state dissguised as a liberal Democracy.

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, July 18, 2009 at 5:30 pm Link to this comment

KD:

If I have to explain a joke then I guess it wasn’t much of a joke.

I didn’t want us to invade Iraq. I don’t want us to invade Iran. And I don’t want us to invade Honduras.

I simply thought it ironic that so many who condemned the coup and demanded action were against action in Iraq…

Report this

By KDelphi, July 18, 2009 at 10:52 am Link to this comment

ITW—That was sarcasm?? Dont get it. Cause knowing US history in the area, we could end up “invading”, even if it is with CIA boys (which we have already done) I thought that you were suggesting that those opposed to coup in Honduras, would want to invade, but, would not go along with “invading Iran”, because of the protests.

I wouldnt invade either one. I thought it was a serious question.

Report this

By Cesar Castillo, July 16, 2009 at 4:08 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Do you guys believe everything you read?. You are just like dried leaves in the wind. Do a research first.

  -Zelaya`s guard consisted in 20 members of the army. That means no one else could go to apprehend him, but, the army.
  -Army guards surrendered to the high officials who came after Zelaya with a Judicial ordern and a designated Judge.
  -Orders to stop his illegal actions were sent to him several days before, He even went in disobedience to pick the ballots at the airforce against an order of the Supreme Court. He was already guilty for the actions before they went after him. And yes, He was sent out, but, that was a political action to avoid the killing of people.

That is called the separation of Powers, not because He was elected ment that He could break the law, like or not. It is not about liking him because He is anti-American, leftist, liberan and anti-corporation.

    If you do not want to see this, is because you want to be blind.

  PS, Is this simple enough?

Report this

By wgardne, July 16, 2009 at 12:08 pm Link to this comment

Okay, most of the disagreements here stem from a misunderstanding of the facts. It is a coup because, as the military itself admits, it engaged in the illegal action of kidnapping and deporting Zelaya to Costa Rica. They were ordered to arrest Zelaya and deliver him to proper judicial authorities, but instead he was stripped of his right to due process. I repeat, you cannot argue from a legalistic perspective and ignore things like due process.

Furthermore, it would be a stretch to conclude that this was not a coup despite all the characteristic analogues to other coups in recent history. The interim government has demonstrated its capacity to be highly repressive, by closing down opposition media outlets and initially shutting off power to a major city. Recently, however, a curfew has been removed that was put in place following the coup.

There have also been suspicious activities, including the murder of two leaders of the UDP. Here are some more developments:
http://newsroom-l.net/newsroom/?p=907

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, July 16, 2009 at 10:15 am Link to this comment

Sheesh, KDelphi…
Is your sarcasm-recognition meter broken?

Report this
Leefeller's avatar

By Leefeller, July 16, 2009 at 9:38 am Link to this comment

A coup may only be called a coup, by the side who looses! Power struggles seem inherent in our lives starting from the bully on the block when a kid, to our local churches and clubs later in life, then at the local political crap to the Feds.

How the hell does one know what is going on in another country, when keeping up with the crap in our own seems impossible? 

Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Israel, Texas, the list goes on!

Report this
Leefeller's avatar

By Leefeller, July 16, 2009 at 7:27 am Link to this comment

Forstwalker,

Confusion of the left may be from definitions of coming from the right. Lumping concepts as left and right seems simplistic, what does left mean, what does right mean, anyone left or righter then you?

Bloomberg just had his term of office extended. Maybe they should have flown him to Canada?

Report this

By Cesar Castillo, July 16, 2009 at 12:16 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

for once I agree with some of you Guys on the left, this is not about liking or disliking Zelaya.  This is about the separation of the different branches of power. Executive, legislative and Judiciary.  Only Goverments like Cuba and Venezuela do not have it in LA, and Zelaya was following the footsteps of Chavez. He was just a few hour to give a coup to the other branches using the perfect excuse, a goberment for the poor. He spent 25 million dollars and still counting to make that not biding (lie) poll. Just one day before the poll, He made it biding and official in the goberment newspaper.

  You have to have tons of naivety, simple mindedness, foolnes and I would say dishonest to believe that. 

  I thought you had better arguments that the ones you have written down.

      Best

        Cesar

Report this

By KDelphi, July 15, 2009 at 9:30 pm Link to this comment

No.

We could cut off all military and foreign aid (which , despite reports to the contrary, the US has NOT done) and we could stop training coup leaders at the School of the Americas. (thats called mettling…not “medaling”)

http://www.soaw.org/presente/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=225&Itemid=74#rials

I already posted a longer reply to the “but we’d have to invade” question , but it disappeared. (my browser couldve just “timed it out”—-RAM too low to defrag)

There are a bunch of paid Chicago School type Central Am “free traders” in here who are upset that Zelaya was joining ALBA, decided to trade with Venezuela (ie Chavez) and was trying to do something for the poor,. He was no “peasant revolutionary”, but if anyone thinks that anything happens in Latin Am without US sticking its huge “missile” in, they are mistaken.

More at the site given.

“...Webster “told us that military aid had been cut off, and that the return of Zelaya as president is non-negotiable although the conditions under which he returns are negotiable,” LeCompte said.

Herrera Hernández, the lawyer with the Honduran attorney general’s office, told Webster that the coup government has disseminated misinformation by claiming the coup was legal because the court had issued an arrest warrant for Zelaya for pushing ahead with a non-binding referendum on whether to change the Honduran constitution.

However, the order to arrest Zelaya came a day after the coup, he said. And contrary to coup propaganda, Zelaya never sought to extend his term in office, and even if the survey had been held, changing the constitution would have required action by the legislature, he said.

Whatever legal argument the coup leaders had against Zelaya, it fell apart when they flew him into exile rather than prosecuting him, the attorney said. The legal system has broken down, he added, for if this can happen to the president, who can’t it happen to?..”

Further:

* US Lobbyists with Clinton Ties Hired to Defend Honduran Coup Regime *

Supporters of the coup in Honduras have begun hiring advisers and lobbyists with close ties to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in an attempt to strengthen support in Washington for the coup. A Honduran business group has hired lobbyist Lanny Davis, who served as White House counsel for President Bill Clinton. The coup government has also hired Bennet Ratcliff, a public relations specialist with ties to former President Bill Clinton.
http://www.democracynow.org/2009/7/15/honduras

(I cant watch the video, but saw it on DN news on Independent tv) am assuming this works…

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, July 15, 2009 at 6:48 pm Link to this comment

So….when are we invading Honduras?

Isn’t that what all the people who were against invading Afghanistan AND Iraq want????

(I was in favor of Afghanistan and totally against Iraq).

Report this

By forestwalker, July 15, 2009 at 11:04 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The coverage of this change in power confuses me on two points:

1.  An executive makes moves to circumvent the constitution and gain more power for the executive branch (sound familiar?) and it is the other institutions of the government (with 80% backing of the populace) acting to stop him that is undemocratic?  Why is it that so many even on the Left buy the idea that the executive obtains irrevocable monarchical powers once they are in office?  We have the same problem here in the US.  I wish we had had the cojones six years ago the Nicaraguans are showing today.

2.  How is it that the argument that a country’s internal operation of its institutional mechanisms (again, with 80% support of the populace) should not be interfered with by outsiders is portrayed as the imperialistic position?  I understand that every state on the planet is against actual democracy challenging executive claims to monarchical power but I don’t understand why the Left is, in so many cases, echoing their argument and condemnation.

Report this

By Ratoeira, July 15, 2009 at 9:59 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

WMG, please, answer this question with a “yes” or “no”: Zelaya, by proposing that referendum, wanted popular support to change in the future a non reformable article of the honduran constitution??? If “yes” is the answer, this means that the referendum was a breach of the honduran constitution. Even indirectly it is a breach. Why would someone do such a thing if he did not want to change the constitution??? The fact that the referendum was “not binding” was only a way to fraud the Constitution, like saying “This is not what everyone is thinking! This is fake! I’m just joking! Just pretending!”...

The constitution of Honduras is clear: anyone who infringed that rule would lose his or her public function. Proposing such a referendum is a manner of inflicting it.

If the Constitution imposes the penalty of losing the function when someone breaches the said rule, if the Judicial Branch considered the action illegal, if the Parliament confirmed such decision and applied the constitutional text, there was no illegality and there was no coup then. The military had to fulfill the decision. They might have exaggerated by deporting Zelaya. But the removal from power was legal. Coups are illegal. Zelaya was deposed legally according to the honduran Constitution.

Legally, the deportation might have been incorrect. But politically it was a great decision because Zelaya would provoke a civil war with the support of Chávez and other populist leaders. And this would be the worst thing because Zelaya was and is wrong. Zelaya infringed the constitution and his deposition was the correct decision in accordance with the major honduran legal text.

Report this

By Justin black, July 15, 2009 at 7:42 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Undo the Coup?

Wouldn’t this require more medaling on behalf of Foreign Powers.

Sure…  undo the coup…  but it’s gotta be a natural fight from the grassroots. Thats when you get real change….

No more medaling!

Report this

By wmg, July 14, 2009 at 1:54 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Let’s start with the facts.

Zelaya wanted to propose a NON-BINDING REFERENDUM, as it is called in Western news sources. It is an “encuesta,” which is very similar to a poll. So basically Zelaya wanted to take the public’s temperature on how it FELT about modifying the constitution. This is completely within the bounds of the constitution.

Furthermore, this debate is not about Zelaya’s politics. Like him or not, his politics and his views are not an argument in favor of an illegal military coup, supporting an usurping and illegitmate government. This debate is about the democratic process, involving one of its main tenets (due process), which was completely disregarded. Recall that Zelaya had no opportunity to defend himself. THe military admits ITSELF that it broke the law by not bringing him to judicial authorities and by having him kidnapped and flown to Costa Rica.

I repeat, a continued use of Zelaya’s politics as a reason for the military coup demonstrates only one’s deeply rooted contempt for democracy and fairness. Just because a legal body makes an accusation does not mean that the accused has no rights and cannot defend himself/herself.

Report this

By Ratoeira, July 14, 2009 at 10:35 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Dear Ardee,

The constitution of Honduras says that nobody can oppose the prohibition of a second term for president. Zelaya convoked a referendum against that rule. What do you think? He convoked that referendum because he did not want to change the constitution? Was he just playing around? You are either very innocent or quite dishonest.

Zelaya performed actions to reform a rule that could not be changed. And the one who ever tried to do that would be kicked out. He had the opportunity to defend himself in the honduran courts because there was a judicial decision before his deposition. He did not care to defend himself. These are facts.

Zelaya wanted a coup against the constitution of Honduras. He was put out of power because the Judicial and Legislative Powers of Honduras decided to fulfill their constitution.

It is clear like water. There was no coup. You and your populist (or communist) friends should gather other sources of information besides CNN.

The military took him out because someone had to fulfill the orders of the Courts and the Parliament.

PS.: If you have curse people because you do not have better arguments, I understand. But everyone knows how to curse. So you do not intimidate anyone with those silly words.

Report this

By Folktruther, July 13, 2009 at 11:43 am Link to this comment

Just ignore them, ardee.  You have to understand that imperialism will always put provocateurs to muddy the waters, just as Zionism does.  The coup leaders, according to recent articles, do not make moves without the approval of an un-named American ‘public relations’ consultatnt who has a translator, and therefore does not speak Spanish well.  No doubt Obama’s man in Honduras.

The Honduras coup differs from the Venzuelian coup in that Honduras has always been a staging area for Amereican military operatons.  The coup against Arbenez in guatamaula, the Cuban invasion, and the Nichrauga death squads all emenated from Honduras.  The military is therefore much more in the US pocket, although a few battalions apparantly revolted.

The real issue is the next election in October, and Obama, who has the world’s only ambassador in Honduras, is orienting the coup to win the next election, and to mute the Honduras uprising.  He will probalby win the battle and lose the war.

this is how history moves forawrd, it sidles sideways like a crab.  The coup by Obama muy be succesful in Honduras, but discredit the US more throughout the Latin American region.  The unified resonse of Latin American is already a vicotry for the Latino people.

Report this

By Cesar Castillo, July 13, 2009 at 1:10 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

It is so easy to use a bad language Ardee with no essence. So far none of you have explained why the same party who elected Zelaya (Liberal) voted 100% at the congress for his restitution, the Judiciary Power voted 100% and only the Communist Party that involves a few unions and they only had 0.2 percent of the total votes in the last elections are with Zelaya which is the UD (Unificacion Democratica), O yea, I forgot to mention they are the party of the poors and Honduras is a rich Nation.

Report this
Leefeller's avatar

By Leefeller, July 12, 2009 at 8:09 am Link to this comment

If it smells like a coup, sounds like a coup and walks like a coup, it is probably a coup!

Report this

By wmg, July 12, 2009 at 7:39 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I feel like the discussion is shrouded in legalism by those who miss what is really going on here. It needs to be viewed inside the context of power relationships among groups. The different branches are vetting these legalistic arguments in order to obscure a situation which plainly involves a reformist president who Greatly Offended the moneyed classes. There would be no other reason to forge a resignation letter (as that is required within the contours of the Honduran constitution).

Report this

By ardee, July 12, 2009 at 6:09 am Link to this comment

To the forum in general

I apologize for the tenor of my response to this group of propagandists who invade this forum to spread lies about the military coup that illegally ousted a democratically elected leader.

I may be caustic but I am honest and sincere, unlike this crew who come here, as they did when Chavez assumed power in Venezuela, only to spread the lies of the CIA and promote military imposition in support of the wealthy elite over a democratic nation.

Report this

By ardee, July 11, 2009 at 6:32 pm Link to this comment

tripletango, July 11 at 5:36 pm

Gee, I have no trouble responding to a fascist prick….

Report this

By tripletango, July 11, 2009 at 2:36 pm Link to this comment

Dear Ardee,
Enough,  I cannot discuss things with an abusive idiot.

Report this

By ardee, July 11, 2009 at 2:18 pm Link to this comment

tripletango, July 11 at 2:27 pm #

Perhaps you need an English to Spanish dictionary?

You call me an extremist when you supported a military coup that ousted a duly elected President.Who the fuck do you think you are fooling?

Report this

By tripletango, July 11, 2009 at 11:27 am Link to this comment

Hi Ardee,  first I have no masters.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maMA3PTYoZE
 
Extremist such as you and your buddies are dangerous to any democratic process. 
The ranting and raving of Chavez is echoed in your posts. His continued blasts of everybody and everything in Honduras just demonstrates that he is awfully upset that his lap dog did not quite pull it off according to the new strategies of the caudillo.
By the way in democracies you don’t get hanged for expressing opinions.  Your idol just shut down a ton of radio and TV stations because they would not report his inane and self serving speeches.  That is not democracy.
Get a life dude.

Report this

By ardee, July 10, 2009 at 10:03 pm Link to this comment

tripletango, July 10 at 11:23 pm #

I have no problem with Chavez helping the poor. I have a problem with Chavez using this tactic to stay in power.
.............................

The fact that you see Chavez’ altruism as a ploy speaks volumes about you and nothing whatever about Hugo Chavez Frias. That he still gets over 65% of the vote must really irk you and your masters.
...............................

tripletango, July 10 at 11:30 pm #

Of course the US govt is willing to sweep Honduran democracy under the rug. You fascists wouldnt have dared kick Zelaya out without the approval of this nation.

Now you pricks are free to rape and pillage,just like the “good” old days.

Cesar Castillo, July 10 at 4:41 pm #

Yeah, Cesar, Ill bet you arent any closer to Honduras that a cubicle in Washington. I have seen this all before, when Chavez rose to power. Then, just like now, there were cockroaches coming out of the woodwork claiming to be Venezuelans, or their cousins, or sisters, or brothers were, or they just returned from there , or worked there still…..Oh yeah, honesty indeed.

Bottom line, you guys usurped the power of the democratically elected govt. of Honduras, spin it all you like. This is a military coup, plian as day, I know it, your fellow states know it, and now you think your business interests are protected from the big bad socialists….

I hope you have nice time, right up until they slip the noose around your neck.

Report this

By tripletango, July 10, 2009 at 8:30 pm Link to this comment

Just to keep you guys up to date as the tide is turning strongly against you who think there has been a military coup. Notwithstanding a 15 minute rant against anything vaguely democratic by Chavez on cnn today.  Here is the latest development.
for your further edification.

July 8th, the House Committee on Foreign Affairs Ranking Member Ileana Ros-Lehtinen hosted a private meeting for her Republican colleagues with former Honduran President Ricardo Maduro and former Costa Rican Ambassador to the U.S. Jaime Daremblum.

According to the invitation, “President Maduro will help to outline the sequence of events leading to the shift in power in Honduras and removal of Manuel Zelaya; provide insight into Honduran constitutional authorities; and discuss how the U.S. can now work to support the democratic institutions and rule of law in Honduras.”

Report this

By tripletango, July 10, 2009 at 8:23 pm Link to this comment

I have no problem with Chavez helping the poor. I have a problem with Chavez using this tactic to stay in power.
Regarding Mel, in whose veins the blood of Christ flows as he claimed while trying to land illegally in a Venezuelan aircraft in Honduras, has now asked for amnesty.
Now as innocent as he claims to be, why does he need amnesty?

Report this

By Cesar Castillo, July 10, 2009 at 1:41 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Ardee,

  I am not looking for support nor clarification, I live in Honduras. I do not want to convice you of the facts, but, I have to speak the truth, not retoric, that is what some Politicians do, maninly Communist Politicians. If you want to find out the truth tell the OAS to send a team of attorneys and do the investigation. But, no, the OAS don`t even want to hear us, no problem.

        Cesar

Report this

By KDelphi, July 10, 2009 at 1:31 pm Link to this comment

Beyond Chavistas and Anti-Chavistas

January 9th 2007, by George Ciccariello-Maher
“A myth has long existed in commentary on Venezuela, which goes something like the following: when discussing the Venezuelan revolution, the relevant actors can be expressed through the binary “Chavista/Anti-Chavista.”
“Caracas indeed needs “saving,” but we won’t be able to help if we limit ourselves to the Chavista/Anti-Chavista binary, one which in the pursuit of objectivity effectively does the work of the oligarchic opposition. There are a multitude of revolutionaries on the ground struggling for their city and their country, attacking both the right and the corrupt and bureaucratic Chavista center, and we will understand little if we systematically ignore their efforts or rob them of their autonomy through fidelity to an analytic binary whose very validity has been decisively ruptured by the Bolivarian Revolution.”

George Ciccariello-Maher is a Ph.D. candidate in political theory at UC Berkeley. He lives in Caracas.

USAns are naturally anti-ALBA, because they are neo-liberal “free” traders and cant imagine upholding their Imperial corporatocracy without people and resources to exploit. US Empire has always been built on the backs of poor and powerless, whether it be Af Ams, Latin Americnas, poor whites or Iraqis…

It seems that neo-libs never run out of ways to get others to do all the work. The ten families in charge of Honduras were true masters at the art of aristocracy. But the time for uS Capitalistic dominance of all the Americaas is over and US corporatins and their allies will have to adapt to that..

Report this

By ardee, July 10, 2009 at 1:11 pm Link to this comment

tripletango, July 10 at 9:21 am #


The basic reason for the aggressive expansion of Alba is the huge demand in the world for petroleum.  These funds are used to buy the vote of the poor and to maintain a power base to insure the succession of those in power.

Chavez uses Venezuelan oil money to assist the poor and downtrodden of his hemisphere, and you find fault with this. I recall no instance of Chavez kidnapping a duly elected leader and deporting him.

In Honduras there is no such luxury.  However Honduras has the poor.  So what is the answer.  Well the first step has been taken in upholding the constitution, no matter who supported Mel or did not support him, he is gone because he broke the law.

You claim Zelaya broke the law, and yet you believe a military coup , a kidnapping and expulsion and a usurpation of a democratic government to be legal…Nice try, not really.
Zelaya had called for a non binding vote to see how the people wished to proceed. Spin it all you wish.

This is a great opportunity for the constitutionalists to press for further reforms.  The constitution is the basis for a need to reawaken Honduran politicians who now must be held to the same high standards required by this document, that was used to expel Mel.

This is a great opportunity for all of the Americas to rise up and make it clear that military coups, abetted by business interests panicked at the thought of curbed profits and forced legality, are no longer tolerated.

Report this

By tripletango, July 10, 2009 at 6:21 am Link to this comment

The basic reason for the aggressive expansion of Alba is the huge demand in the world for petroleum.  These funds are used to buy the vote of the poor and to maintain a power base to insure the succession of those in power.

In Honduras there is no such luxury.  However Honduras has the poor.  So what is the answer.  Well the first step has been taken in upholding the constitution, no matter who supported Mel or did not support him, he is gone because he broke the law.

This is a great opportunity for the constitutionalists to press for further reforms.  The constitution is the basis for a need to reawaken Honduran politicians who now must be held to the same high standards required by this document, that was used to expel Mel.

Report this

By WMG, July 10, 2009 at 4:35 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Well Zelaya was opposed by many of the entrenched elites in Honduras. Naturally there would be such an outcome if those elites had pull in the Congress and Courts.

I really don’t think there was due process in this case. There was no evidence brought to Zelaya (recall that he was literally spirited away to Costa Rica in his pajamas). Zelaya had no opportunity to defend himself. Furthermore the military has cut off electricity, shut down opposition media, and engaged in violence against Zelaya’s return. According to that constitution, in Article 184, Zelaya does have 6 months to appeal the supreme courts ruling.

Furthermore, looking more closely at the constitution, Article 3 states that the new government is illegitimate:
No person shall owe loyalty to an usurping government or those who owe their office or public charge by force of arms

It seems as if this intense legalism is really just propaganda used to justify the removal of a reform president who had the support of social organizations and labor unions.

Report this

By ardee, July 10, 2009 at 3:10 am Link to this comment

In South America almost every leader is against the new president of Honduras, Roberto Micheletti. This is because most of that leadership is composed by Zelaya’s populist allies, who are capable of supporting ANYTHING the populist leaders ever do.

Of course, everyone opposed to a military coup that you are quite probably being paid to support is a commie rat bastard…Makes perfect sense…not.

They all condemned the colombian president, Uribe, when he incursed in Ecuador - which is ruled by a populist, Correa - to defeat TERRORISTS from the FARC (Colombian Revolutionary Armed Forces). There are strong suspicions that the FARC members had been supported and sheltered by the government of Ecuador.

The nerve of some people, objecting to a military action by a leader who supports death squads in his own nation, actions that just happened to be an incursion on the sovereign soil of another nation…The nerve I say!

Further, there isnt the slightest shred of proof that Ecuador supported FARC in any way. This is a smokescreen designed only to manufacture some overarching left wing plot that would justify the right wing military coup that ousted Zelaya.

Zelaya sought a constitutionally allowed and non binding vote on the question of an additional term in office. For that he was kidnapped and exiled, not to preserve democracy, but to preserve business interests and due in part to right wing fear of Hugo Chavez under your bed.

Report this

By Ratoeira, July 9, 2009 at 9:55 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

WMG, the due process clause has been respected by the honduran authorities. The deposition of Zelaya has been preceded by a judicial decision that recognized being illegal the reform that the former president wanted to perform. The legal consequence was the deposition, in accordance with art. 239 of the constitution of Honduras. After the judicial decision, the honduran Parliament officially declared the loss of Zelaya’s presidency. Everything has been made pursuant the honduran constitutional order and this sovereign decisions should be respected by the other States.

In South America almost every leader is against the new president of Honduras, Roberto Micheletti. This is because most of that leadership is composed by Zelaya’s populist allies, who are capable of supporting ANYTHING the populist leaders ever do.

They all condemned the colombian president, Uribe, when he incursed in Ecuador - which is ruled by a populist, Correa - to defeat TERRORISTS from the FARC (Colombian Revolutionary Armed Forces). There are strong suspicions that the FARC members had been supported and sheltered by the government of Ecuador. The disapproval was because the members of FARC have similar ideals than the populist leaders - they all have communist backgrounds and the FARC is a communist organization. This example was just to demonstrate until these leaders might go to reach their ideals. The populist leaders will always be together no matter what. But the leaders from the other parts of the world should pay attention to the constitution of Honduras, which was respected.

Report this

By Ratoeira, July 9, 2009 at 7:11 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Zelaya’s actions are very similar to the ones undertaken by other latin american polititians, such as Chávez and Morales, ever since they got to the respective presidencies. They are elected according to some rules and once are in power they try to change the rules in accordance with their will - this means to exclude others from power afterwards. Chávez can be reelected eternally because of a reform made last year in the Constitution of Venezuela.

Their system of government is based on favours and low cost benefits to the poor population in order to obtain - this means, in practice, buy - their votes. Since the major population of Latin America is poor and have a low level of education, the new populist polititians have a large platform to go on their goals of continuity. This is how Chávez approves almost every referendum he calls.

In Brazil this is much clear too. The current president, Lula, also a populist, is voted by the vast majority of the poor population, but the middle class and the rich population practically do not vote for him.

In Argentina, things appear to be changing. Cristina Kirchner, populist, had a painful lost recently in the legislative elections. The argentinian population is more reluctant to accept populism. And the answer is their level of education, wich is better than what happens in the other countries.

The big problem is that the situation of the poor population in Latin America does not change much with the populist policies. But most of them - except in Argentina - vote for the populist polititians because are fooled by the benefits given to them.

Report this

By ardee, July 8, 2009 at 6:29 pm Link to this comment

For those of us who didnt learn Spanish at Langley:

ARTICULO 239. - The citizen who has carried out the ownership of the Executive authority could not be President or Vice-president of the Republic. The one that breaks this disposition or proposes its reform, as well as those supports that it direct or indirectly, will stop immediately in the performance of their respective positions and will be disqualified by ten (10) years for the exercise of all public function.”


....and yeah, me neither.

Report this

By Ratoeira, July 8, 2009 at 3:35 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

There was NO COUP. Everyone who says that there was a coup could read the constitution of Honduras, mainly its article 239. I’ll get it for you all:

ARTICULO 239.- El ciudadano que haya desempeñado la titularidad del Poder Ejecutivo no podrá ser Presidente o Vicepresidente de la República.

El que quebrante esta disposición o proponga su reforma, así como aquellos que lo apoyen directa o indirectamente, cesarán de inmediato en el desempeño de sus respectivos cargos y quedarán inhabilitados por diez (10) años para el ejercicio de toda función pública.”

Here it is… Zelaya was kicked according to the Constitution of Honduras. And after a judicial decision confirmed by the legislative branch. There was NO COUP.

Report this

By ardee, July 8, 2009 at 1:25 pm Link to this comment

I recall, shortly after Chavez came to power in Venezuela, political forums were visited by first timers who swore they lived in Venezuela, knew all sorts of insider stuff about what an evil man he was, how the people really didnt support him, etc. They disappeared as abruptly as they had appeared.

I think we may be seeing a redux. I suspect these newbies havent been outside a cubicle much less to Honduras….

Report this

By KDelphi, July 8, 2009 at 1:08 pm Link to this comment

Folktruther—stop picking on my spelling! Its my typing that sucks…lol

DS1815—its known as AMENDING the Constitution. The US Constitution (which hs now DC toilet paper) has 27.
Isnt it actually the Left Wing ALBA , and, other Leftist forces in the Americas that bothers you? True , Zelaya is not part of a “peasant revolution”—he is a former supporter of NAFTA and neo-liberal Latin American thinking of the ruling class. But, that changed. And he lost the support of the military wind of the govt. Hondoruas is, traditionally, a haven for US Right Wing death squads, like the Contras of Nicaragua.

 

“...The act that ostensibly saw Zelaya removed by the military was a proposal that the public vote in a non-binding poll to see if there was popular support for a democratic review of the constitution.

One of the alleged changes was a removal of the single-term limit for a president to remain in office. It is this that the coup plotters have focused on. ...

However, the constitution itself has interesting origins. It was written in 1981 when the military reluctantly took a step into the background after 10 years of dictatorship and permitted civilian rule. But only on their terms. They still wield significant political and economic power….

The growing strength and confidence of trade unions and social movements since Zelaya has joined forces with progressive governments elsewhere in Latin America must be a cause of alarm for the military….”


...But, if Zelaya does return, the unity and determination of Latin American leaders to stand up for him and the militancy of grass-roots movements in his defense is likely to strengthen those who seek to bring an end to US imperialism in Latin America.”


http://www.politicalaffairs.net/article/articleview/8764/

Report this

By DS1815, July 8, 2009 at 7:59 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I am sad that the U.S. government and the OAS demand that Zelaya be returned to power. That would be a “huge step back” for the rule of law. It would require Honduras to break their law.
You cannot have democracy without the rule of law. No man, even a democratically elected man, can be above the law. If one man is above the law, then that man is a dictator, no matter the method he used to get into office.
If the U.S. and the OAS require Honduras to accept Zelaya back as president for even one day, then they have done what Zelaya was trying to do: destroy the foundation of democracy by destroying the rule of law. That is why this is so important to Chavez. It will show the world Honduran laws are not LAWS, but guidelines that can be broken when enough pressure is applied. At that point democracy is lost, and the only question that remains is who can apply enough pressure to change the laws as he/she sees fit. In other words, who is the dictator?
On a more emotional note, I find it repugnant and condescending for the world to basically tell Honduras to “just take him back with ‘limited powers’ and the promise he’ll leave in January.’” That solution would not only require Honduras to break their law to accept Zelaya’s return, but also rewrite their constitution to limit the “president’s” powers! Can you imagine if the Honduran president had told the U.S. they needed to restore Nixon to office with limited powers (despite the constitution) if he promised to stop breaking the law? The U.S. would laugh, if they even bothered to respond.
And that gets to the heart of my problem with the U.S.‘s and OAS’s demands that Zelaya return in any way other than as a common citizen. It is proof that they believe “might makes right.” I.e., if we are strong enough, your laws must bend to our will. That is the true “universal principle” that the U.S. and OAS are espousing. And it is the direct opposite of the rule of law and democracy.

Report this
Leefeller's avatar

By Leefeller, July 8, 2009 at 6:57 am Link to this comment

Professional politicians in our country seem to have made themselves a nice feather bed. Occasionally they vote themselves a raise, have a medical plan which should be the envy of most the people,  and I believe they have a not to shabby retirement plan.  After Political time, the good old boy network provides some further job security after the hard political life, maybe working for one the the companies they supported when in office or even becoming one of the lobby folks who frequent the halls of congress, so it is like many never really leave.

Seems, in the Californium were term limits are imposed, the special learning curve needed to partake in the proper running of the land is way too short, many complain much more time is needed to make decisions which support the people. 

So which is it, more time to run the land like royalty or the pope with both great and bad results or is it politicians who run the land with term limits or no term limits to run the land with both great and bad results? 

In, the end the people get screwed and Humphrey Dumpy does not get put back together again. In the great scheme of things, does it really matter to the people?

Report this

By Folktruther, July 7, 2009 at 10:03 pm Link to this comment

I am one with my ideological brother Trith against the rigid dogmatism that there is only one right way to spell a word.  KDelphi used to be a bad speller but, unfortunately, she got better.  It’s lonely at the bottom.

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, July 7, 2009 at 8:03 pm Link to this comment

Wot’s wraung with FT’s speling, ArTee?

Lukz feine two mee!

Report this

By ardee, July 7, 2009 at 4:23 pm Link to this comment

Folktruther, July 7 at 1:23 pm #

Yeah, and he spells better than you too!

Sorry FT, couldnt resist, no offense really….

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, July 7, 2009 at 3:41 pm Link to this comment

Hey, everybody!

I GOT it!

Let’s pull the troops out of Iraq…..

AND INVADE HONDURAS!!!!!

Hey, now that’s a plan worthy of George Dubya Bush, if I say so myself!

Report this

By wmg, July 7, 2009 at 12:44 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Further investigation of the Honduran constitution will reveal a document wrought with contradiction and inefficiency. Article 269 is explicit in its rule, but Article 40 guarantees the right to due process. Despite the “immediate” language embedded in 269, the Honduran government runs based on Civil Law. The courts therefore must only engage in very narrow interpretations of their constitution, without regard for precedent. “Social norms” and the “Living document” arguments do not come into play. Furthermore, given the lack of any hierarchical system to determine which article is superior, it is impossible to determine whether Article 40 or 269 takes precedent.

Report this

By tripletango, July 7, 2009 at 12:19 pm Link to this comment

I live here in Honduras and the photos you see of the large gatherings of people dressed in blue and white are the constitutionalists who want their country to be a democracy.  Zelaya basically got himself fired from the presidency as there are no ifs ands or buts about messing with term limits as prescribed in the constitution. The military did him a favor by taking him to CR.  He is still a free man.  If he returns to Honduras he will be arrested and jailed as he broke the law. 
If I was him and had as much money as he has I would quietly fade into the distance as a happy and wealthy man.

Report this

By Folktruther, July 7, 2009 at 10:23 am Link to this comment

That’s interesting.  The US is apparently sending comenters who argue that the military coup is ‘really’ Consititutional.  These truthers are obviously not comming from Honduras or, if they are, are, are Ameican and CIA led.  This cyber-warfare is probably a reason why China is blocking the Internet with the US supported demonstrations in China, as well as the general tendency of all power to repress the powerless.

Report this

By tripletango, July 7, 2009 at 5:26 am Link to this comment

The truth about the so called Military coup.

http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0702/p09s03-coop.html

Under our Constitution, what happened in Honduras recently. Soldiers arrested and sent out of the country a Honduran citizen who, the day before, through his own actions had stripped himself of the presidency.

These are the facts: On June 26, President Zelaya issued a decree ordering all government employees to take part in the “Public Opinion Poll to convene a National Constitutional Assembly.” In doing so, Zelaya triggered a constitutional provision that automatically removed him from office.

Constitutional assemblies are convened to write new constitutions. When Zelaya published that decree to initiate an “opinion poll” about the possibility of convening a national assembly, he contravened the unchangeable articles of the Constitution that deal with the prohibition of reelecting a president and of extending his term. His actions showed intent.

Our Constitution takes such intent seriously. According to Article 239: “No citizen who has already served as head of the Executive Branch can be President or Vice-President. Whoever violates this law or proposes its reform [emphasis added], as well as those that support such violation directly or indirectly, will immediately cease in their functions and will be unable to hold any public office for a period of 10 years.”

Notice that the article speaks about intent and that it also says “immediately” – as in “instant,” as in “no trial required,” as in “no impeachment needed.”

Continuismo – the tendency of heads of state to extend their rule indefinitely – has been the lifeblood of Latin America’s authoritarian tradition. The Constitution’s provision of instant sanction might sound draconian, but every Latin American democrat knows how much of a threat to our fragile democracies continuismo presents. In Latin America, chiefs of state have often been above the law. The instant sanction of the supreme law has successfully prevented the possibility of a new Honduran continuismo.

The Supreme Court and the attorney general ordered Zelaya’s arrest for disobeying several court orders compelling him to obey the Constitution. He was detained and taken to Costa Rica. Why? Congress needed time to convene and remove him from office. With him inside the country that would have been impossible. This decision was taken by the 123 (of the 128) members of Congress present that day.

Don’t believe the coup myth. The Honduran military acted entirely within the bounds of the Constitution. The military gained nothing but the respect of the nation by its actions.

I am extremely proud of my compatriots. Finally, we have decided to stand up and become a country of laws, not men. From now on, here in Honduras, no one will be above the law.

Octavio Sánchez, a lawyer, is a former presidential adviser (2002-05) and minister of culture (2005-06) of the Republic of Honduras.

Report this

By wmg, July 7, 2009 at 2:40 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I have a question about the arguments surrounding the coup. There are many on the right who claim that the coup was not in fact a coup, but a legal operation done in full of Article 239 of the Honduran Constitution:

“Any Public Official that tries to change, reform or amend the Constitution in order for there to be Presidential Re-Election, by either direct or indirect means, will be IMMEDIATELY removed from office.”

Zelaya was ousted and not brought before proper Judicial authorities, in which case some investigation is deserved, but isn’t this all within the legal restraints of the constitution? Doesn’t poll evidence reveal that Zelaya is not at all in good standing with Hondurans?

Report this

By ardee, July 6, 2009 at 3:04 pm Link to this comment

Roberto Micheletti.the usurper President, has publicly stated that fear of the growing alliance between Zelaya and Chavez was seen as endangering Honduran business interests and was a principle reason for the coup.

Its gotta be the USA behind this , all common sense shows that plainly.

Report this

By KDelphi, July 6, 2009 at 12:43 pm Link to this comment

Damn right, ardee!

Hands Off Venezuela!!

http://www.handsoffvenezuela.org/venezuela_us_clash_in_oas_over_syagogue.htm

“...Also Wednesday, Maduro held what he called a “fruitful” meeting with representatives of the Venezuelan Jewish community, in which he reiterated the government’s repudiation of the attacks on the synagogue….

“We confirm personally in the name of President Chavez our absolute condemnation of this attack on the sacred place of the Jewish Community,” said Maduro. “We ratify our willingness to maintain the lines of communication open and we call on those who practice the [Jewish] religion not to listen to the campaign that seeks to politically manipulate an event that we repudiate.”

The minister expressed little doubt that the attack was an electoral tactic of government adversaries who met with the U.S. government in Puerto Rico last month for purposes that are still unknown.

“We are sure they did this in a specific moment in order to stir up the waters and disrupt the climate of peace in which Venezuelans are living as we approach voting day,” said Maduro. “Could it be part of the Puerto Rico plan?”

Also, Venezuelan Analysis:

http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/news/4205

“...El Aissami said Monday that the hate speech was a diversion meant to impede the investigation and direct blame toward the government, which had dismissed the Israeli ambassador in January to protest Israel’s assault on the Gaza strip. ...

...Maduro also differentiated between Venezuela’s opposition to Israel’s attack on Gaza and its attitude toward the Venezuelan Jewish Community.”

“Foreign policy has nothing to do with our relationship with religious communities… we establish a clear separation between our respect for religious communities and international conficts,” Maduro said Thursday”

There is also the claim by the Jewish community , ie, saying that there was a Jewish “settlement” in Honduras in 1500’s. After seeing what happened in Gaza, it must frighten them, thinking it might be claimed as part of a “homeland”. That might be “paranoid”, but Israel’s action in Gaza have consequences for the planet, not just Israel…..

Report this

By ardee, July 6, 2009 at 3:11 am Link to this comment

Speaking of thinking…your accusations against Chavez towards the Jewish community there is innacurate and typical of one who seeks support rather than clarification.

The enmity between Chavez and the Jewish community in Venezuela stemmed from two occurrences; support by Jewish leaders for an aborted coup against Chavez and Chavez condemnation of Israeli attacks on Lebanon.

Here is a hardly impartial source for you:

http://www.forward.com/articles/12500/

Report this

By Cesar Castillo, July 5, 2009 at 12:05 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Hello Amy,

I want to say a few words about your article. Do you know reason, for Zelaya`s destitution?, call it a coup if you want. Army just received an order from the Judiciary Power. President Zelaya was noticed several times that He was breaking the law and that He was tring with schemes with fwe to make Honduras a Colony of the Imperialist Chavez in Venezuela. I am a Honduran, have all kind of friends all over. Did you know that if you are a jew in Venezuela you are by order of Chavez a trator, a Capitalist (sin according to Chavez).  Hope that you won`t regret that or one of your family, perhaps you don`t care about the jewish, since a am a judea-christian I do care, cause we christians and jewish are in the top of persecution for this kind of Goverment. I am proud of what the Congres, Judiciary Power, Catholic and Evangelicals have been standing up for, and we are majority.  Think about it.
     
        Best

Report this

By KDelphi, July 5, 2009 at 11:44 am Link to this comment

we “recognize” Honduras, as it is, not for any benign reason, but, to continue our military interventoin and “foreign ” “aid” (neo-liberal “free mkt ” crap)

Also, the US is terrified of ALBA and the Bolivarian Revolution in Latin America.

They are terrified of losing markerts nd resources to pillage. That is all. USAns should stop trying to put a “color” “freedom” sticker on it.

It is what an Empire does. Sick of it? Stop voting the Imperislist Duopoly in, peeps.

http://21stcenturysocialism.com/article/alba_latin_americas_anti-imperialist_economic_project_01110.html

ALBA: Latin America’s anti-imperialist economic project
Cuba, Venezuela and other countries on the Latin American continent are rejecting the neo-liberal model of integration and development.


“The Bolivarian Alternative for Latin America and the Caribbean (ALBA) is a different proposal of integration. Whilst the Free Trade Area of the Americas (ALCA or FTAA) responds to the interests of transnational capital and pursues the absolute liberalization of trade in goods, services and investment, ALBA puts the emphasis on the struggle against poverty and social exclusion and, therefore, it expresses the interests of the Latin American peoples.”[1]

Report this

By KDelphi, July 5, 2009 at 10:06 am Link to this comment

Here’s an article by Alezx Cockburn from 2006 warning us what to expect from Obama (You seemed to recognize that at the time, Outraged…)(as many did here)

http://www.counterpunch.org/cockburn04242006.html

Here is a good one by him about “Twittergasms” (Iranian “revolution”) From June 24th

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20090713/cockburn

“How much easier it is to raise three—or 3 million—rousing tweets for the demonstrators in Tehran than to mount any sort of political resistance at home! Here we have a new Democratic president, propelled into office on a magic carpet of progressive pledges, now methodically flouting them one by one, with scarcely a twit or even a tweet raised in protest, aside from the gallant efforts of Medea Benjamin, Russell Mokhiber and their comrades at the healthcare hearings in Congress.”


And on the Honduran coup:
http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/50017,opinion,did-barack-obama-know-about-the-honduras-coup-plot-before-it-happened

“We can take it as an absolute certainty that CIA and Pentagon advisors were at the elbows of the Honduran plotters, giving the green light and barely bothering to maintain deniability. The coup was modeled on the initial stages of the attempted ouster of Chavez in 2002, before popular resistance put Chavez back in power. Earlier versions of the script are profuse in the archives of the School of the Americas…..

...The first statements from President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton bear all the hallmarks of careful preparation. In the coup’s immediate aftermath they merely urged negotiations with the coup plotters to “restore constitutional order”, feebly urging “all political and social actors in Honduras to respect democratic norms, the rule of law and the tenets of the Inter-American Democratic Charter”.

Carefully avoided was any tough demand by Obama or Clinton - still hoarse from shouts for “democracy” in Iran - for the legitimate Honduran President Zelaya to be returned to office. The plan was obviously to try and run out the clock with indecisive parleys until Zelaya’s term ends in six months time.

It was only after furious denunciation of the coup and a call for Zelaya’s reinstatement from the Organisation of American States, the presidents of Brazil and Argentina, the Rio Group, the European Union, and the UN General Assembly, that Obama was forced to climb off the fence and declare on Monday that “We believe that the coup was not legal and that President Zelaya remains the president of Honduras…”

Report this

By Folktruther, July 4, 2009 at 9:16 pm Link to this comment

As I said on another thread, an article in the Monthly Review states that the US is the only country that now recognizes Honduras.  Obama is looking forward rather than backward again.

Report this

By Folktruther, July 4, 2009 at 12:37 pm Link to this comment

Fooosh.  thus I refute Outrage.  Read Alex Cockburn’s July 4th piece on Counterpunch which lays out the (wild-eyed) facts of American imperialism.

Report this
Outraged's avatar

By Outraged, July 4, 2009 at 2:32 am Link to this comment

Re: Folktruther

Your comment: “The president is a liar.  Obama’s duplicity in this case is to OK the coup while publically regretting it.  He has not condemned it as a military coup because tnen he would be required by law to cut off funds for Honduras,”

Mere speculation and accusation, it IS being addressed, aside from YOUR hardline attempts to imply otherwise.  According to you, THE WHOLE WORLD revolves around Pres. Barak Obama, a specious assumption to say the least.  You may want to check with THE WORLD before asserting such wild-eyed speculations.

The LATS:
“The politicians now sitting in the presidential palace argue that the soldiers who rousted Zelaya from his bedroom before dawn Sunday and deported him to Costa Rica were acting to save democracy, after, they allege, Zelaya’s many abuses of power.

Honduran newspapers and television, most of which are controlled by a few big businessmen, give lavish coverage to demonstrations against Zelaya and in favor of the man Congress named to replace him, Roberto Micheletti.

Pro-Zelaya rallies get scant mention and the accounts usually focus on “vandalism”—the painting of slogans.

The polarization raises the specter that Honduras will plunge back into violence and repression.

Despite some progress, Honduras has remained a country run largely by a small elite, where 70% of the population lives in poverty. (Zelaya, known for populist rhetoric and leftist alliances that made him a polarizing figure, is a wealthy rancher and timber tycoon.) Congress is controlled by two old-fashioned political parties, based more on tradition and family than ideology.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-honduras4-2009jul04,0,229012.story

And from UPI:
“TEGUCIGALPA, Honduras, July 4 (UPI)—Four United Nations human rights experts Thursday joined U.N. leaders in voicing serious concern over last weekend’s coup d’etat in Honduras.

They called for the democracy to be restored immediately and decried curbs on fundamental freedoms. The experts cited reported arrests, threats and harassment of social leaders, journalists and defenders of human rights.”
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2009/07/04/More-UN-officials-decry-Honduran-coup/UPI-40001246683468/

But this is not necessarily a condition where one “runs in with tanks and guns ablazing”, it needs to be worked out.  The People do NOT want a dictator, right OR left.  The OAS and the UN, HAVE condemned this situation, this includes the United States of America (on both counts), your conjecture that “The president is a liar” is without merit.

However, this is not news, since when have “The People” EVER endorsed these types of dictatorships….. NEVER, never have…. never will.  These articles do not support your premise.  And YES….. they ARE calling it a “coup d’etat”.

The Truthdig article from BBC:
“Speaking to reporters, the OAS chief said: “We wanted to ask that this situation [Mr Zelaya’s removal] be reversed. Unfortunately, one must say that there appears to be no willingness to do this.”

Ending his visit to Honduras, he said the change of government last week had unequivocally been a “military coup”.”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8133981.stm

Report this

By Folktruther, July 3, 2009 at 9:19 am Link to this comment

the Obama truth trademark has been to say one thing in rhetoric and to do the opposite.  this confounds people who do not to be so unpatriotic and as call the president a liar. 

The president is a liar.  Obama’s duplicity in this case is to OK the coup while publically regretting it.  He has not condemned it as a military coup because tnen he would be required by law to cut off funds for Honduras, which largely runs on US money of various types.  It’s exactly the same thing that Bush did in Iran with a totally different rhetoric.

If you want to believe the rhetoric, and not look at the facts, in order to support Obama, that is your perogotive.  But why then did you support Nader?  Nader was honest.

Report this
Outraged's avatar

By Outraged, July 2, 2009 at 11:39 pm Link to this comment

Re: Folktruther

My last post was meant to be directed to you (“system problems”) you know how it is.

Anyway, I was addressing your comment:  “NYTIme news indicates that Obama is stalling”

Report this
Outraged's avatar

By Outraged, July 2, 2009 at 11:22 pm Link to this comment

The OAS:

“The Organization of American States (OAS) brings together the nations of the Western Hemisphere to strengthen cooperation on democratic values, defend common interests and debate the major issues facing the region and the world. The OAS is the region’s principal multilateral forum for strengthening democracy, promoting human rights, and confronting shared problems such as poverty, terrorism, illegal drugs and corruption. It plays a leading role in carrying out mandates established by the hemisphere’s leaders through the Summits of the Americas.

With four official languages — English, Spanish, Portuguese and French — the OAS reflects the rich diversity of the hemisphere’s peoples and cultures. It is made up of 35 member states: the independent nations of North, Central and South America and the Caribbean.”
http://www.oas.org/key_issues/eng/KeyIssue_Detail.asp?kis_sec=20

For the record The United States of America is a member of the OAS, check out the link.

Bloomberg:
“Jose Miguel Insulza, the secretary-general of the Organization of American States, travels to Honduras today to meet with de-facto president Roberto Micheletti, the head of the legislature who was sworn in after Zelaya’s ouster. The OAS, along with U.S. President Barack Obama and the European Union, has called for Zelaya’s immediate reinstatement.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aOSQNfG9EKoc

According to you (at least) Obama is “stalling” what are you looking for here….?  Again, my original premise, but a couple MORE:

According to Amy Goodmans article”
”“The coup, led by the Honduran Gen. Romeo Vasquez, has been condemned by the United States, the European Union, the United Nations, the Organization of American States and all of Honduras’ immediate national neighbors.”

From Bloomberg News:
No government in the world that calls itself democratic can negotiate with an illegal government that usurped power through force,” Zelaya said in an interview over a breakfast of fried eggs, toast and an antacid pill at the Sheraton Hotel in Panama City, where he said he got his first night of rest since soldiers forced him out of the country at gunpoint.

Jose Miguel Insulza, the secretary-general of the Organization of American States, travels to Honduras today to meet with de-facto president Roberto Micheletti, the head of the legislature who was sworn in after Zelaya’s ouster. The OAS, along with U.S. President Barack Obama and the European Union, has called for Zelaya’s immediate reinstatement.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aOSQNfG9EKoc

Report this

By Folktruther, July 2, 2009 at 9:20 pm Link to this comment

The latest NYTIme news indicates that Obama is stalling while pretending to investigate whether this is a military coup.  The NYTimes says that Obama has been “ardently” against the coup.  You bet.  The same Hope you can believe in that he campaigned on.

Report this

By Folktruther, July 2, 2009 at 9:10 pm Link to this comment

Xntrik, what article says that the US is supporting withholding money from Honduras.  that’s good news if its true but it doesn’t sound right.  the NYTimes and the other major outlets don’t say so

Report this
Outraged's avatar

By Outraged, July 2, 2009 at 6:50 pm Link to this comment

Re: Xntrk

Your comment:  “Back to the coup: The US Government has put a hold on all monies scheduled to go to Honduras until there is a legal decission concerning the kind of coup this is. If it a ‘Military’ coup, the money HAS to be withheld. The article said that it is fairly certain the action by the Honduran Military meets the legal definition of a Military Coup.”

Thanks Xntrk, that’s good to know.  Important.

Report this

By ardee, July 2, 2009 at 5:51 pm Link to this comment

Folktruther, July 2 at 7:07 pm #

As I remember, ardee, you are the first person to openly state that you changed your mind on TD, except for myself.
.............................

As long as we arent the last!

Self examination includes a continual challenging of one most closely held beliefs, if one is to be intellectually honest.

Report this

By Xntrk, July 2, 2009 at 4:57 pm Link to this comment

Back to the coup: The US Government has put a hold on all monies scheduled to go to Honduras until there is a legal decission concerning the kind of coup this is. If it a ‘Military’ coup, the money HAS to be withheld. The article said that it is fairly certain the action by the Honduran Military meets the legal definition of a Military Coup.

All of the EU Nations [24 I believe] have recalled their Ambassadors and staffs from Honduras.

The Military continues to block travel in Honduras. Civil Liberties have been suspended: People are subject to arrest in their own home without warrants, and can be held without charges.

As for sources of information, I certainly don’t view the Christian Science Monitor as an unbiased news source. It’s pretty right wing for my tastes. Al Jazeera has at least one reporter reporting live from Honduras. That is where I got the above information.

Sounds to me like the Obama Administration may do the right thing. Maybe they read my e-mail!

Report this

By Folktruther, July 2, 2009 at 4:07 pm Link to this comment

As I remember, ardee, you are the first person to openly state that you changed your mind on TD, except for myself.

Report this

By Héctor, July 2, 2009 at 1:06 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Roberto, WHO DO YOU WANT TO LIE? 80% of the population is poor in Honduras! Don´t you see that the bubble you live in just busted on Sunday 28th! You are a shame! You´d better show a poll made in shanty houses to prove your wrong statement!!!

Report this

By bogi666, July 2, 2009 at 12:38 pm Link to this comment

This coup is providing Obushama with his 1st new foreign policy test and it seems to me it’s engineered by the Pentagon to test Obushama on his sincerity or even if he has sincerity. The Honduras generals are all alumni of the Fort Benning SOA, School of Assassins/School of the Americas. The Pentagon had to have knowledge of and/or approved of the coup, if not its instigator. It’s what makes sense. To change the subject, why is it that when Somali’s hijack a ship they are fearsome, inhuman pirates and when Israel hijacks a ship it’s not piracy? Something’s wrong with these pictures!

Report this

By ardee, July 2, 2009 at 12:19 pm Link to this comment

Old Dude, July 2 at 1:14 pm #

Nice to hear from you again,Old Dude ( different place). I wonder at the articles veracity as it is impossible to know for whom this author toils. I do respect the source however, The CSM is a widely respected news source. We must be very careful here to figure this out correctly.

When I learned of the relationship between Zelaya and Chavez my opinion changed actually.

By the by, FT:
“Ardee orginally stated that that was only my opinion and I could not know the truth of the matter.  Later, to my astonishment, he retracted his criticism as more information came was available.”

The astonished part hurts, really…:-)

Report this
Outraged's avatar

By Outraged, July 2, 2009 at 11:45 am Link to this comment

Repost 2.

Daily Kos:
“The AP has a headline worthy of a drama queen: Feds Could Seize Calif. Parks If Closed By Budget!  Oh noes!  Shades of the Fifth Amendment’s takings clause!

The reality is different.  The state will abandon these parks and 200 more, thanks to an insurmountable budget crisis.  The specific parks being eyed by the NPS have been bought and paid for by the federal government and/or they’re on federal land, donated by the federal government on the condition that the state keep them as parks; if the state can’t, then the parks revert back to the feds.

Besides the legalese, there’s a better reason for the NPS to take back California state parkland: the NPS can take better care of the lands than the state.  California is utterly dysfunctional.  The NPS is proposing an intervention.”
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/7/1/748867/-Go-Ahead,-NPS,-Seize-These-Cal-State-Parks,-Please!

“An investigation by Sen. John Rockefeller, D-W.Va., shows that nearly 20 regional and national insurers also used Ingenix data. An ongoing probe by New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo previously focused on the use of Ingenix data by only a handful of top insurers, including Aetna, Wellpoint and Cigna. About a dozen insurers, including UnitedHealth, have already reached settlements with Cuomo.

Tuesday’s report arrives as President Barack Obama and Democrats in Congress step up calls for a public health care option. The idea is vigorously opposed by Republicans and insurance industry executives, who say a public plan would drive private companies out of the marketplace.”
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5g4s2x4w7hv-cWoKaCbdWmE1sQecAD991BJOO0

No….it doesn’t appear to be Obama or his admin.(at least not most of them).

Report this
Outraged's avatar

By Outraged, July 2, 2009 at 11:44 am Link to this comment

Re: Folktruther

Your comment: “Obama eventually said that Zelaya was the legal president but evaded calling it a coup, which would reguire the US legally to cut off aid.”

This comment directly conflicts with the article, which says:

“The coup, led by the Honduran Gen. Romeo Vasquez, has been condemned by the United States, the European Union, the United Nations, the Organization of American States and all of Honduras’ immediate national neighbors.”

I don’t say Obama and his admin. are without flaw, but best to wait and see…..‘cause many hate Obama.  still, fight for what we want——without let up. (they don’t like us either)

A repost of my other post:

“The Obama administration announced today an expansion of a key part of its foreclosure prevention program to allow more homeowners who owe more than their home is worth to refinance into lower-cost mortgages.

The effort is an acknowledgment by the administration that falling home prices limited the impact of its housing program, Making Home Affordable. Under the program, homeowners could refinance if their mortgage did not exceed the value of their home by more than 105 percent. Now, the administration is expanding the program to homeowners who are up to 125 percent underwater on their loan.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/01/AR2009070102063.html?hpid=moreheadlines

“June 25 (Bloomberg)—U.S. banks are fighting the Obama administration plan to create a consumer agency for financial services as they seek to protect fees, such as credit-card penalties that have almost doubled to $19 billion in five years.

Fees imposed by banks accounted for 53 percent of industry income in 2008, up from 35 percent in 1995, according to R.K. Hammer Investment Bankers, a credit-card advisory firm. JPMorgan Chase & Co., the second-largest U.S. bank by assets, said such revenue doubled in the first quarter. A U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Agency also may add costs by expanding scrutiny.”
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&si;d=agR2UE7gabLM

The Obama administration proposed a regulation Wednesday that would shave as much as $87.5 billion from the cost of one expensive component of healthcare reform.

The House is considering legislation that would make permanent reforms to the way Medicare pays physicians. The current formula, which has called for cuts to doctors’ fees every year since 2002, is universally regarded as flawed, but the cost of fixing it has been pegged at $285 billion over 10 years or more.

“As part of healthcare reform, the administration supports comprehensive, but fiscally responsible, reforms to the physician payment formula,” says a statement issued by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.”
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/administration-trims-health-reform-price-tag-2009-07-01.html

The Obama administration Monday announced it would fast-track solar-energy development in the West, with Interior Secretary Ken Salazar signing an order setting aside more than 1,000 square miles of public land for two years of study and environmental review.

The government will help companies build powerful solar farms in the desert Southwest by pre-qualifying huge swaths of federal land for development.

The Department of Interior said Monday it will designate 670,000 acres of federal land in Nevada, Arizona, California, Colorado, New Mexico and Utah as study areas for utility-scale solar projects.”
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2009400028_solar30.html

Report this

By Old Dude, July 2, 2009 at 10:14 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

With all respect to Amy Goodman and her wonderful work; here is another take on the “Coup” in Honduras.
http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0702/p09s03-coop.html

Maybe it was not a coup at all.

Report this

By Folktruther, July 2, 2009 at 10:13 am Link to this comment

I stated that the Honduras coup could not have occurred without Obama agreeing to it, as other commenters did.  Ardee orginally stated that that was only my opinion and I could not know the truth of the matter.  Later, to my astonishment, he retracted his criticism as more information came was available.

Most Americans war not as generous minded as Ardee and do not want to know the truth as much.  Nevertheless, it illustrates that sincere Americans can change their minds as more information is provided.  And it is the progressive rank and file that we must focus on because the right wingers like Trith are deranged and the Zionist lemmings and Ziofascists are hopeless.  Americans will change their minds as more information comes in and, more important, increase the emphasis of communial truths in their worldviews.

The mainstream American media tell the specific truth from the background of the power interests of the American power structure. But it is also possisble to view specific events from the background of the American people, and ever from a world historical perspective.  When this is done, specific events like the Honduras coup can be seen from a people perspective rather than a power perspective.

this coup resembles the Venzueala coup which the US president supported with financial payments and then backed away from when Latin Americn and the Venzuelan people opposed it.  the Obama public relations trademark is saying one thing rhetorically and doing the opposite.  Obama eventually said that Zelaya was the legal president but evaded calling it a coup, which would reguire the US legally to cut off aid.  He may in fact be stalling to allow Zelaya’s term of office run out in a few months.

If the people had a background of a people context, rather than the power context of the US media, they could easily make serious charges like the American president is sponsoring violence and illegality.  that is, they could tell the simple reality-based truth even if it were unpatriotic and uneducated to do so.  It is uneducated because we are indoctrianted by schools, universities and other learned bureaucracies to perceive reality from a power perspective rather than a people perspective.

But this can be changed over historical time to allow the population to look at their traditional power systems with a cold eye.  Especilly those nearly the end of their life cycle and whose economic and political systems are obsolete.

Report this
Leefeller's avatar

By Leefeller, July 2, 2009 at 6:18 am Link to this comment

Outraged,

Comments on corporatist politics are most interesting, after all the new world order is only a change change in scope, not necessarily a change in the people pulling the strings. Opportunism always has been and will always be, 80 percent of the people voted against opportunism or business as usual, so opportunists took action to protect their opportunism. After all the ignorant masses do not need wealth.

Report this
Outraged's avatar

By Outraged, July 1, 2009 at 10:05 pm Link to this comment

I’m not the best at geo-politics, but to me it seems the overriding issue here is multi-national corporations, not the U.S. goverment.  While we know our government is infected with these elements and has been corrupted by them, the pressure is on to tamp down on these crooks.  When that happens, they will retaliate, send out their propagandists and create issue after supposed issue.  Remember, they still have some power in our government, but they are losing it, it is being exposed.

Article quote: ”“Most of this military have been trained by the School of America. ... They have been guardians of the multinational business from the United States or from other countries. ... The army in Honduras has links with very powerful people, very rich, wealthy people who keep the poverty in the country. We are occupied by your country.”

And Xntrk:
“As for who supports whom, the wealthy Oligarchs support the Coup. They do not constitute ‘80%’ of the country. The peasants and the workers are in favor of Zelaya - they elected him after all.

Over 70% of the population live below the poverty level. Over 50% are existing on less than half of the supposed poverty level. One of Zelaya biggest crimes was raising the minimum wage by 70%.”

And KDelphi’s post:
“One provision, which Zelaya chose not to ratify, calls for common defense in case one of the member states is attacked by the US.”

Since the US has incorporated Mexico, Colombia and Peru with “free” trade agreements, it sees ALBA as a threat to Intl corporatism that serves the elites of all countries, but, primarily the uS.”

So why would Zelaya NOT ratify (that was Oct 2008), could it be because he knew it was NOT the U.S. Goverment he had to fear, George Bush’s Government sure…. but not the one slated to win.

These elites would want to make it APPEAR that the goverment’s behind this (now that Obama is president), but is “the government”..... or is only the portion the crooks still have control of?  Remember, these facsists have been infiltrating our government for YEARS, and logic says a portion of them are still there.

From November 21-23, the annual November vigil to close the SOA/WHINSEC at the gates of Fort Benning will follow the election of President Barack Obama by two weeks. It will be an opportunity for the progressive movement to set an agenda for a new direction in U.S.-Latin America foreign policy.
http://www.soaw.org/article.php?id=1668

A bill to abolish the school with 134 co-sponsors was introduced to the House Armed Services Committee in 2005.

In June 2007 the McGovern/Lewis Amendment to shut off funding for the Institute failed by 6 votes. This effort to close the Institute was endorsed by the non-partisan Council on Hemispheric Affairs who called the Institute a “black eye”.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School_of_the_Americas

Pressure is increasing to close SOA….. then enters the other “black eye” or Blackwater, now know as Xe.

“Cofer Black, the company’s current vice chairman, was director of the CIA’s Counterterrorist Center (CTC) at the time of the September 11 attacks in 2001. He was the United States Department of State coordinator for counterterrorism with the rank of ambassador at large from December 2002 to November 2004. After leaving public service, Black became chairman of the privately owned intelligence gathering company Total Intelligence Solutions, Inc., as well as vice chairman for Xe. Robert Richer was vice president of intelligence until January 2007, when he formed Total Intelligence Solutions. He was formerly the head of the CIA’s Near East Division.  Black was senior advisor for counterterrorism and national security issues for the 2008 Presidential election bid of Mitt Romney.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackwater_usa

Fascists always operate a shadow army or police force, and they infiltrate the real one.

Report this
Paul_GA's avatar

By Paul_GA, July 1, 2009 at 7:33 pm Link to this comment

I knew about Cubans being in Ethiopia and Angola, Trailing Begonia, but not Libya. I thought it was the Soviets in Libya. Oh, well; Fidel’s boys used to get around the world pretty good, eh?

And since when was I offended in any way?

Report this

By Lester Shepherd, July 1, 2009 at 7:23 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

DaveWilhoit,

Who the hell is Roberto Martinez?  I know.  Addicto Rushbow Limbaugh.  The Honduran population does NOT support the coup, fool.  Where do you get this crap?

Report this
Trailing Begonia's avatar

By Trailing Begonia, July 1, 2009 at 7:21 pm Link to this comment

Paul

Would it surprise you to know that not only was Cuba in LibYa and Angola but also Ethipia?  See, someone made a good point that Americans are being ‘informed’ by the MSM media which is a dangerous thing.  They also get their ‘facts’ and ‘truths’ from other gringos who write books without having ever set a foot on the country they’re writing about, yet, somehow, they appoint themselves as experts and, once it goes down in black & white, it becomes “the truth.” 

But, whatever, I see by your little comment that you have taken offense so, whatever!  Go on reading Yahoo News and books written by gringos.  What do I care?  It certainly ain’t my problem.

Report this
Trailing Begonia's avatar

By Trailing Begonia, July 1, 2009 at 7:16 pm Link to this comment

Daryl Davis:

Ahem…Haiti is NOT a Latin American country!

Report this

By Commune115, July 1, 2009 at 6:16 pm Link to this comment

Nice “democracy” Honduras now has:

Congress passed laws on Wednesday which will allow police to arrest people in their own homes without a warrant during a nightly curfew that has been in place since Manuel Zelaya was ousted.

“The deputies have decided to suspend several liberties, among them the liberties of free movement and association - people can be arrested for 24 hours without having any rights,” Al Jazeera’s Mariana Sanchez, reporting from the capital, Tegucigalpa, said.

Report this

By Daryl Davies, July 1, 2009 at 5:15 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

What is all this about “The first coup d’etat in Central America in more than a quarter-century”?

Have we forgotten Haiti?

There was a coup in September 1991 and another in 2004. 
Similar to the Honduran coup, Aristide was kidnapped by U.S. Marines from his home in 2004.

Report this
Leefeller's avatar

By Leefeller, July 1, 2009 at 4:42 pm Link to this comment

As they say in politics, I voted for it, but hoped it would not pass or I did not vote for it, but hoped it would pass. 

It seems, US finger prints are all over the planet! It feels so nice to know our government is protecting us.

Report this

By Xntrk, July 1, 2009 at 4:20 pm Link to this comment

Perhaps it would be helpful for some of the people who seem to know everything about Honduran politics and its Constitution, to read news from Latin America rather than the MSM.

Three sites I would recommend are: http://aliveinhonduras.org/

http://upsidedownworld.org/main/

http://narcosphere.narconews.com/

The problem with the media here and in Europe is that the military has shut down the TV and radio, limited electricity, and blocked transportation into Tegucigalpa. Makes it a bit tough for the well-known journalists to broadcast 27/7.

The current ‘President’ was not the VP, he was the head of the Congress. Zelaya canned the General, which is within his powers. At least it was till the SC declared otherwise. As for who supports whom, the wealthy Oligarchs support the Coup. They do not constitute ‘80%’ of the country. The peasants and the workers are in favor of Zelaya - they elected him after all.

Over 70% of the population live below the poverty level. Over 50% are existing on less than half of the supposed poverty level. One of Zelaya biggest crimes was raising the minimum wage by 70%.

He was originally elected as just another big time Oligarch. However, the effects of CAFTA, which his predecessor signed, increased unemployment and poverty so much, that Zelaya broke with his class, and moved to the Left. I guess you could call it empathy for the starving public.

See what happens when you actually read some of the news that isn’t controlled by the Corporate Media? Sometimes, you can even learn something!

If you’d like to read a truly Left-Wing view, Check out Fidel’s latest Reflection, at either http://www.granma.cu/ingles/, or the Prensa Latina web site.

Report this

By hippie4ever, July 1, 2009 at 3:54 pm Link to this comment

The media “obsession” with Jackson & Sanford is deliberate & furthers their agenda of manipulating reality for powerful interests. Nothing new there. Iran became a huge story largely thanks to the Internet & telecommunications.

Honduras can be viewed as a big piece of American Guilt. The SOA and Ronny Raygun’s adventures in Central America are without merit and embarrassing. Even people in this country are becoming aware of high crimes committed & uncharged. “We didn’t know” and “we trusted our leaders” are rapidly becoming a chorus to shout down “I prefer to concentrate on the future” and “I have a full plate.”

Report this

By ardee, July 1, 2009 at 3:09 pm Link to this comment

Retraction…

I have resisted the notion that the US was behind this coup. However, as the facts continue to roll in, including the relationship between Zelaya and Hugo Chavez, coupled with Zelaya’s joining ALBA, well, looks like I owe FT an apology!

Report this

By DaveWilhoit, July 1, 2009 at 2:47 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

While I myself am more than disgusted by the past and present atrocities committed by the SOA against the Central and South American people, this is a separate issue from the events occurring now in Honduras. Roberto Martinez correctly pointed out that the Honduran population backs the “coup,” which was also supported and celebrated by the congress. It was celebrated because many feared that Zelaya would cheat in the upcoming vote that would remove presidential term limits, similar to that which Chavez subjected his population to twice, in 2007 and 2009, before winning. Any attempt by foreign pressure to “restore” former President Zelaya to his former position seems to be against the will of both the democratically elected government and the people. This seems by world powers more like an attempt to back any democratically elected official without considering the damage he or she might inflict. It seems hypocritical for a worldwide community to decry the pacifistic ousting of a corrupt government who has lost the confidence of both the government around him and his electorate, yet applaud (and rightfully so) the mass protests against the corrupt election results in Iran.

Report this
Paul_GA's avatar

By Paul_GA, July 1, 2009 at 2:13 pm Link to this comment

Excuse me, Trailing Begonia, but “Lybia”? You mean “Libya”, don’t you? And I thought Cuban troops were in Angola during the `80s, not in Libya.

Anyhow, if Zelaya hasn’t got capable, battle-ready international friends to bring him back home triumphantly, he’d best prepare for a long exile ... like the rest of his life. They may not even let his dead body back in after he dies.

Report this
Trailing Begonia's avatar

By Trailing Begonia, July 1, 2009 at 1:18 pm Link to this comment

Paul;

Cuba is actually weaker than you think…What I related to you are facts, given to me by my family who are still there. 

The technology that Cuba has was given to them by the Russian, slightly absolete by now, I doubt that Venezuela has much more.  Cuba is also not as beligerant as it was and haven’t been in any quagmire since the early 80s in Lybia.  But I agree with you, hopefully, they’ll find a peaceful solution to the problem.  Maybe if Venezuela, Cuba and Nicaragua get together and do a show of false bravado, threaten to go in and mobilize some troops to the border where it’s visible, this guy will back down but there’s no guarantee.  These bullies can be very thick-skulled, at the expense of the people, of course.

As for the US, hey, don’t forget that it’s 3 quagmires not just 2 (Pakistan is almost full force) and I doubt that they’ll wanno go into Honduras, it has no oil and it ‘poses no threat’ to Israel.  So, there!

Report this

By Lester Shepherd, July 1, 2009 at 1:08 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Well, well.  I found this on Z. 

“In the Honduran coup, the Obama administration claims that it tried to discourage the Honduran military from taking this action. It would be interesting to know what these discussions were like. Did administration officials say, “You know that we will have to say that we are against such a move if you do it, because everyone else will?”  Or was it more like, “Don’t do it, because we will do everything in our power to reverse any such coup.”?  The administration’s actions since the coup indicate something more like the former, if not worse.”

Report this
lOst_sOuls_rembrd's avatar

By lOst_sOuls_rembrd, July 1, 2009 at 12:32 pm Link to this comment

Great column and I learned so much about the real issues that are going on in that country.  The DemocracyNow! show was brilliant today.

Thanks Ms. Goodman for excellent work.  I watch your show everyday.

Report this
Paul_GA's avatar

By Paul_GA, July 1, 2009 at 11:04 am Link to this comment

Trailing Begonia, I hope this mess will be resolved without violence; I was speculating. Cuba may not be as weak as you think it is—especially if Chavez transports Cuban paratroops alongside his own in whatever aircraft he has at his disposal (as I see it, what’s needed is not American-style space-age high-tech, but low-tech in the form of a well-trained, primarily infantry invasion force—something the USA hasn’t got, bogged down in two quagmires as it is).

Report this

By KDelphi, July 1, 2009 at 10:21 am Link to this comment

From the article Bliss Doubt quotes at wsws.org


“..The official speaking to the Times complained, however, that the administration did not expect that the Honduran army would go so far as to carry out an overt military coup. The Obama administration was evidently seeking to engineer a de facto coup, but with a gloss of constitutional legality. Thus Washington’s main complaint about the Honduran coup is not that the army intervened in politics. Rather, it is that the Honduran army’s open intervention has exploded the democratic veneer that the bourgeois media tries to give to US foreign policy….

...Seen in the context of Honduras’ historical role as a center of US-backed counterrevolution, the ouster of Zelaya constitutes a sharp warning to the working class in the Americas. Prompted by concern over the political ramifications of Zelaya’s links to Venezuela, a US-backed coup in Honduras could well be the signal for a broader regional campaign by US imperialism against Venezuela and allied regimes throughout the continent”

The real reason for US “fear” of “trends” (and Chavez and Moralesw…and on and on)in Latin America:

“..Zelaya was overthrown because his populism was seen as a threat both to conservative sections of the bourgeoisie in Honduras and to US strategic interests in Latin America and the Caribbean….

...In October 2008, Zelaya joined the Bolivarian Alliance for the Americas (ALBA in Spanish), a regional alliance organized by Chávez that includes Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador, Cuba, Nicaragua, Honduras, Dominica, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, and Antigua and Barbuda. Member states receive subsidies coming largely from Venezuelan oil earnings. One provision, which Zelaya chose not to ratify, calls for common defense in case one of the member states is attacked by the US.”

Since the US has incorporated Mexico, Colombia and Peru with “free” trade agreements, it sees ALBA as a threat to Intl corporatism that serves the elites of all countries, but, primarily the uS.

Report this

By NYCartist, July 1, 2009 at 9:09 am Link to this comment

Amy, I cannot resist, adding to “Undo the Coup”:

Coups have things in common: lies, blocking out information in the media (also known as a GAG rule).
I heard the segment this morning, on WBAI.  The “coup” in progress (the second in a decade) at WBAI had put on a GAG rule and there are lies by the coupsters, who say as they wish on the air.  (Dem.Now has been used as a tool to cut into the early morning show, and cut it by one hour, and it had been Amy Goodman and Bernard White’s WakeUpCall when it began.  Amy and Juan Gonzalez protested this use of Dem.Now.)

For information of the radio/Pacifica Network coup, and some good video, including Lynne Stewart, go to
http://www.wbixradio.org Also visit the ON-DEMAND section for list of videos.

And for good videos and update on Gaza humanitarian aid ship taken, people arrested (including Cynthia McKinney), see http://www.wbaix.org WBAI-in-Exile

The coup of a decade ago, was undone by listeners of the Pacifica Network.  We shall undo the coup at WBAI (and it’s ongoing at the other Pacifica stations also): goal by the coupsters is to make radio corporatized
as is goal in military coups.

Report this
Trailing Begonia's avatar

By Trailing Begonia, July 1, 2009 at 9:06 am Link to this comment

Paul:

I agree with your sentiment but, it’s easier said than done?  What is Cuba gonna fight them with?  Shoes, perhaps?  Oops, no, they ain’t none of those to spare over there…

Sadly, Cuba - like the US - can’t even support its own people, the economy is a joke (waaay past non-existant), the people are litteraly living on air slices and their military arsel died with the collapse of the Soviet Union.  They’re not in the business of ‘spreading Communism’ like they once were back in the roaring 70s and 80s and today (this is no joke), their soldiers ride horses to the military parades because they don’t have vehicles or the fuel for whatever junk they’ve got.

Report this
Paul_GA's avatar

By Paul_GA, July 1, 2009 at 8:59 am Link to this comment

I think it’s obvious that Zelaya won’t be returning to power unless an international “restoration-of-democracy” force, perhaps led by Venezuela and Cuba, invades Honduras and he rides home on its coattails.

And what will Mordor-on-the-Potomac say or do then? I imagine they’ll squawk like angry wet chickens, but they won’t be able to do much more, thanks to the two quagmires this country has bogged itself down in.

What’s needed now is the will to act, in Caracas and Havana—and to hang tough and defy the gringos when they make noises. Have they got it? Stay tuned.

Report this

Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 >

Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.