|
|||
|
Free Speech vs. Surveillance in the Digital AgePosted on Jun 23, 2009By Amy Goodman Tools of mass communication that were once the province of governments and corporations now fit in your pocket. Cell phones can capture video and send it wirelessly to the Internet. People can send eyewitness accounts, photos and videos, with a few keystrokes, to thousands or even millions via social networking sites. As these technologies have developed, so too has the ability to monitor, filter, censor and block them. A Wall Street Journal report this week claimed that the “Iranian regime has developed, with the assistance of European telecommunications companies, one of the world’s most sophisticated mechanisms for controlling and censoring the Internet, allowing it to examine the content of individual online communications on a massive scale.” The article named Nokia Siemens Networks as the provider of equipment capable of “deep packet inspection.” DPI, according to the Electronic Privacy Information Center, “enables Internet Service Providers to intercept virtually all of their customers’ Internet activity, including Web surfing data, e-mail and peer-to-peer downloads.” Nokia Siemens has refuted the allegation, saying in a press release that the company “has provided Lawful Intercept capability solely for the monitoring of local voice calls in Iran.” It is this issue, of what is legal, that must be addressed. “Lawful intercept” means that people can be monitored, located and censored. Global standards need to be adopted that protect the freedom to communicate, to dissent. China has very sophisticated Internet monitoring and censoring capabilities, referred to as “the Great Firewall of China,” which attracted increased attention prior to the 2008 Summer Olympic Games. A document leaked before a U.S. Senate human rights hearing implicated Cisco, a California-based maker of Internet routers, in marketing to the Chinese government to accommodate monitoring and censorship goals. The Chinese government now requires any computer sold there after July 1, 2009, to include software called “Green Dam,” which critics say will further empower the government to monitor Internet use. Josh Silver, executive director of Free Press, a media policy group, says the actions of Iran and China should alert us to domestic surveillance issues in the U.S. He told me: “This technology that monitors everything that goes through the Internet is something that works, it’s readily available, and there’s no legislation in the United States that prevents the U.S. government from employing it. ... It’s widely known that the major carriers, particularly AT&T and Verizon, were being asked by the NSA [National Security Agency], by the Bush administration ... to deploy off-the-shelf technology made by some of these companies like Cisco.” The equipment formed the backbone of the “warrantless wiretapping” program. Advertisement Tamm told me: “I think I put my country first ... our government is still violating the law. I’m convinced ... that a lot more Americans have been illegally wiretapped than we know.” The warrantless wiretapping program was widely considered illegal. After abruptly switching his position in midcampaign, then-Sen. Barack Obama voted along with most in Congress to grant telecom companies like AT&T and Verizon retroactive immunity from prosecution. The New York Times recently reported that the NSA maintains a database called Pinwale, with millions of intercepted e-mail, including some from former President Bill Clinton. U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder was recently asked by Sen. Russ Feingold if he felt that the original warrantless wiretap program was illegal: Feingold: “[I]s there any doubt in your mind that the warrantless wiretapping program was illegal?” Holder: “Well, I think that the warrantless wiretapping program, as it existed at that point, was certainly unwise, in that it was put together without the approval of Congress.” Feingold: “But I asked you, Mr. Attorney General, not whether it was unwise, but whether you consider it to have been illegal.” Holder: “The policy was an unwise one.” Dissenters in Iran and China persist despite repression that is enabled in part by equipment from U.S. and European companies. In the U.S., the Obama administration is following a dangerous path with Bush-era spy programs that should be suspended and prosecuted, not extended and defended. © 2009 Amy Goodman Distributed by King Features Syndicate CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By Gabby, July 22, 2009 at 9:14 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I was just thinking about how President Obama has said pretty much nothing about the wire-tapping and unwarrented domestic spying. I was hoping that he would advocate for people more. I don’t see this happening as much. I mean really, he has the chance to right what went wrong and this could be our future that depends on it. I like Pres. Obama for a lot of reasons, and even if he is making some mistakes at least he is bringing things to light. While some think controversy is the last thing we need. I totally disagree. We are not all the same and we need to support what we believe, no more of this ‘let’s all hold hands’ crap. Spying on people is wrong. I love America. I would be willing to believe things if I seriously thought they made sense. If you really think about it, this stuff is barbaric. It helps no one in the long-run. Obviously they hold a lot of sway and can manipulate people, those with power and authority. They’re not even helping themselves. This shouldn’t be about healthcare reform. The issue we need to address is Corruption with a capital C. We’ve built towers out of sand.
It’s a path towards Anarchy and total chaos. This is what will happen in a police state, everyone here is treated like a criminal. The idea that anyone can just tap your phone raises questions of ‘who is the real authority here, aren’t we in a democracy?’ Or maybe it’s like being ultra-paranoid. Who are we kidding? And if we’re supposedly all a part of a free government. I’ll spy on whoever the hell I want to as well. And we’re putting together this technology for it…we’re creating a problem that will be the stamp of failure until it falls apart.
No, and actually this is a form of harassment. If you don’t even have a warrant you are harassing people. We’re neighbors here…living in a digital dark ages. Stop acting like we have something to brag about anymore. That’s pretty cynical but as long as justice is being destroyed there’s no reason to hide behind a smile.
Report thisBy j edgar, June 29, 2009 at 9:43 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
this doesn’t sound like something new. ever since there were people in some position of power who did not trust those they were supposed to be serving or protecting, they did whatever they could to find out if there was any plans against them or their interests. paranoid delusions can never be satisfied that what they are looking for is not real since they’ll constantly believe it is being hidden from them. sad thing is that who ever controls the information of private lives can try to conrol the politicians in power or get rid of them by exposing their secrets. Ordinary citizens have much less to worry about as long as you stay ordinary and not attempt to fight for the power that should be a right in a democracy. just some late night ramblings that came to mind while readng this article.
Report this... “pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.”
By CaptainAldo, June 27, 2009 at 11:35 am Link to this comment
Our Democracy has become only a clever fiction feeding sentimental rhetorical statements. We are already a Prison World. Regarding Obama…the REAL Obama ...read this:
http://aldovidali.com/general/may-day-the-president-broke-his-compass
Our only hope to prevent an Orwellian nightmare is the total collapse of the satanic capitalist system and the creation of a participative true democracy controlled by instant popular referendums which can easily be securely created with the same technology that is now being used to control the people and enslave us.
Report thisBy CaptainAldo, June 27, 2009 at 11:30 am Link to this comment
Our Democracy has become only a clever fiction feeding sentimental rhetorical statements. We are already the’Prison World.’ Regarding Obama…the REAL Obama! ...read this:
http://aldovidali.com/general/may-day-the-president-broke-his-compass
Our only hope to prevent an Orwellian nightmare is the total collapse of the satanic capitalist system and the creation of a participative true democracy controlled by instant popular referendums which can easily be securely created with the same technology that is now being used to control the people and enslave us.
Report thisBy Virginia777, June 25, 2009 at 10:18 pm Link to this comment
I’m with you, idarad!
since they know it all (or are listening in),
why not just speak the truth?
(and have nothing to worry about, at least nothing that really matters)
Report thisBy idarad, June 25, 2009 at 6:42 pm Link to this comment
As much as I deplore the eradication of the constitution - for there is really nothing left there to argue, as it has been shred by poor interpretation in the courts, mischaracterized by the politicos, of re-written by the mindless spin-masters until it is an empty point of reference- what is difficult for me to comprehend is why do we need to have all this “cloak and dagger crap?
I know you will think me naive, but if we lived in an open and free society, didn’t try to hide behind our own shadows, we might be able to deal with the reality of the world. Spying, classifying everything for national security, on and on, is the same as telling a lie. Once you tell one lie, you have to tell another so you don’t get caught in the first lie, then you have to tell a couple more lies to cover for the first, and after awhile you can’t remember what or why you lied in the first place, so to cover up your stupidity, you say “well, I can’t tell you or I’d have to kill you” and soon you have foreign policy.
I know I went off tangent here,but it is mind numbing how we continue to create a world that is diametrically opposed to what we state outright, then we argue among ourselves about the symptoms while the disease is expanding. We created a box and now we need a bigger box to protect the .........
And all I want is my constitution back, has anyone seen it lately?
Report thisBy KDelphi, June 25, 2009 at 8:08 am Link to this comment
“Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. “
Frederick Douglass
Xntrk—That is some of the problem—these “sifters” pick up so much crap, that an “attack”
could be happening outside the door and these dweebs would never notice.
Folktruther—Yes. Maybe we should try to get a US protest going and ask Iranian middle class to support us…
Report thisBy mrreynolds, June 24, 2009 at 11:59 pm Link to this comment
I have documents pertaining to allegations of illegal electronic surveillance, obstruction of justice & making false statements in writing to Congress in regards to the documented “existence” of a federal internal affairs investigation which the U.S. Marshals Service denied existed when questioned by Congress. Please review the supporting information within my website. Thank you.
http://www.daprocess.com
Report thisBy Samson, June 24, 2009 at 5:17 pm Link to this comment
Start talking in code now. It was US and European laws and law enforcement that required the telecoms to implement this technology. Do you think that they only did that just in case some day the Iranians and the Chinese would need it?
The White Heron flies at dawn. Repeat. The White Heron flies at dawn.
The widows cry outside the church. Repeat. The widows cry outside the church.
@%GH%&SGHE;%^**ODME$%^QRGDJKT&*)%&@#$weryhwr68r*#$&@YSKR&*(#$%YGHNDFJKE%^*#$%YQEAHQ@#%!@#TAERHW^*#%^UISFNDTYIO%&*()$E%^TQAHSTJETIR^&IO;%$^R&KED;%YQW#$^QHSR%^UIE%&(I$^&IEDTMSDR;%YW$%&U#%^*$^*()T&IOFTCHIKSDE;$%^QW%QWATGASZHSTUE%^*ISJSR%^Q@#%!
Report thisBy Folktruther, June 24, 2009 at 11:41 am Link to this comment
The Obama administration is continuing the postmodern police state initiated by Bush, Obama being explicly in favor of spying on the American popuation to Make US Safer. Under Obama combat brigades of the US military has been stationed as is being trained in the US. Their training manual, as Lndorff stated in a Counterpunch article, defines demonstrations as “low level terrorism.” Obama is in favor of preventive detention, and has concealed torture practiced by the Bushites under soaring Democratic rhetoric. Obama is in favor of the same Freedom&Democracy; at home that he is promoting in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran and Palestine.
Report thisBy Jean Gerar, June 24, 2009 at 10:32 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I sometimes think about this surveillance business and whether I should worry about it or not, but every time I am overwhelmed by the sheer redundancy and banality of it. If we have enough people who are willing to spend their time and earn their salt by sifting through these tons and tons of electronic stuff looking for possible boogiemen, the nation is already sunk in ignorance and fear.
Report thisBy NYCartist, June 24, 2009 at 8:16 am Link to this comment
We rely on independent media, such as blogs, collections of articles (such as here), Glenn Greenwald’s column (http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald
and community/listener sponsored radio, such as WBAI, which is part of the Pacifica network, and where I have been a listener to DemocracyNow from day 1.
We need to know that we are being “spied” on the government. It’s not new, (remember COINTELPRO in the
1960s and 1970s? google if not old enough to have lived through it or heard of it until later). But the new tech makes it easier.
Independent media is threatened. WBAI is in another Pacifica battle:there’s been another “coup” at a time when we need independent media. There’s a GAG rule at the station: if you mention the issues, you will be fired and banned, like some activists have been. What’s important to notice, if you don’t follow the issues, is local control and who is lining up with which side: for the dissident views -
(I support the “fired and banned”)see
http://www.wbixradio.org Don DeBar has videos of people speaking about the issues and video of the June 17 rally outside the radio station, speakers include Lynne Stewart
(see the ON-DEMAND section for list of videos)
Also, http://www.wbaix.org WBAI-in-Exile which has news by the fired/banned DonDeBar, as well as special reports
Report this(just up, Special Report on Gaza w/DonDeBar interviewing former Rep Cynthia McKinney and Greta Berlin of Free Gaza Movement, June 24, 2009).(See the ON-DEMAND section for list of videos/sound)
By photoshock, June 24, 2009 at 2:37 am Link to this comment
If the ‘elite masters of the universe,’ get their way, the people will not have the means of communication any longer. No phone or any personal device that we know of today will exist but for the few elite that need to communicate their intentions to the enforcement arm of their regime.
Report thisYou think this is far fetched? The Constitution does not and disallows any ‘central bank’ and yet in 1913 Calvin Coolidge signed into law, the ‘Federal Reserve Act.’ Ever since then, we have had nothing but economic disarray and chaos on the orders of the other central banks and have no economic stability today. Still, Ben Bernanke, the current head of the Federal Reserve, wants more power to control the economy and the money supply, this according to an article in the NYT yesterday.
Rambling? Yes, I am, because these subjects all intertwine and are happening as we speak. This illegal and unethical government has struck at the very heart of our republic, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Soon all will be controlled and no more freedom of movement and communication will be allowed any where in the world. We are headed back to the age of feudalism and worse slavery of the masses to the overlords of the world. See for yourself and prisonplanet.tv and you too, will start to feel the outrage and disgust at those who wish to control the world at the microcosmic level.
By Clark, June 24, 2009 at 2:22 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
“Unwise.”
No one disseminates more lies than do our government and our corporate media. Perhaps the liars in power need to eavesdrop on ordinary citizens because it is their only way of feeling connected to something beyond their vampire dens.
Report thisBy Christopher Parsons, June 23, 2009 at 11:11 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I would warn you to be cautious of the actual capabilities of the Iranian government to use networking technologies to ‘censor’ communications. Is it theoretically possible? Maybe. Is it possible to, in practice, configure DPI appliances to massively inspect and regulate gigabytes of packets per second in real time? No.
The WSJ really seems to be hyping DPI at the expense of the truth. I’ve recently blogged about this here: http://www.christopher-parsons.com/blog/politics/iran-traffic-analysis-and-deep-packet-inspection/ - if you’re interested in the capacities of the technology itself, I’d invite you to take a look at what I’ve written.
Report thisBy Xntrk, June 23, 2009 at 5:06 pm Link to this comment
Of course such monitoring is [should be?] illegal. It is also unethical and uncalled for. OTOH, I have assumed for the past 8 years that anything I do online, or say on the telephone is, or may be, monitored by my government. Why would any sane person think otherwise?
The question I have about the ability to monitor every citizen, or alien, as they text their way down the highway of life, is: What on earth do they do with all that BS?
Obviously our law enforcement is clueless about most criminal plots that aren’t set-up by the FBI. The trivial, silly, ignorant, and intellectual, and criminal, blather is collected, but then what? Given programs that search for key words and can, kind of, understand context, at some point, humans must get involved. I cannot imagine a more deadly job. And those who would do it must be too dull to figure out what they are reading or listening to.
The hearing in British Columbia about the fatal tasering of a Polish immigrant by the Mounties is a good example. During closing arguments, the Prosecutor coughs up an e-mail between top officials that contradicts sworn testimony by the officers involved. She had had it since early April [and the authorities had it since the get-go]. But, it was on a CD with 285 other e-mails, and she said he hadn’t gotten around to reading them - nor had her staff…
Perhaps 3000 years from now archeologists will de-cipher the reams of garbage being collected by governments today. Just imagine their response as they wade thru phone sex, porno sites, grocery lists, and the how-to lists inundating the internet. Google almost anything, and you get so many hits - most of them arcane - no one checks more then the first 10 or so.
Yes, it should be forbidden, no matter how tempting the thought is to Spooks. We cannot afford these kinds of fishing expeditions. And, it destroys what little trust we have in our government, assuming there is any left.
Report thisBy squeaky jones, June 23, 2009 at 4:58 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Is this thing on. Testing, testing 1,2,3. Soon, we will have to start talking in code, and using two cans and a string. Squeaky.
Report this