LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman. Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
May 18, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     elizabeth warren     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

The History That Birthed the Tsarnaev Boys

Jerry Brown: California's Mystery Man

'The Daily Show': Stewart Slams Hypocrites Cheney and Rumsfeld

Arctic Tundra ‘Will Turn to Forest’

How the IRS' Nonprofit Division Got So Dysfunctional

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Arctic Tundra ‘Will Turn to Forest’
How the IRS’ Nonprofit Division Got So Dysfunctional
Recurring Nightmares? Wake Up and Take Action

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Act of Congress
Daily Rituals
The Girls of Atomic City

Digs

Truthdig Bazaar
Hope: A Tragedy: A Novel

Hope: A Tragedy: A Novel

By Shalom Auslander

more items

 
Reports

Health Care’s Enigma in Chief

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on May 15, 2009
ENTER_ALT_TEXT
Flickr.com / HSeverson

By David Sirota

The most stunning and least reported news about President Obama’s press conference with health industry executives this week wasn’t those executives’ willingness to negotiate with a Democrat. It was that Democrat’s eagerness to involve those executives in a discussion about health care reform even as they revealed their previous plans to pilfer $2 trillion from Americans.

That was the little-noticed message from the made-for-TV spectacle administration officials called a health care “game changer”: In saying they can voluntarily slash $200 billion a year off the country’s medical bills over the next decade and still preserve their profits, health care companies implicitly acknowledged they were plotting to fleece consumers, and have been fleecing them for years. With that acknowledgment came the tacit admission that the industry’s business is based not on respectable returns, but on grotesque profiteering and waste—the kind that can give up $2 trillion and still guarantee huge margins.

Chief among the profiteers at the White House event were insurance companies, which have raised premiums by 119 percent since 1999, and one obvious question is why—why would Obama engage those particular thieves?

It’s a difficult query to answer, because Obama is a health care mystery, struggling to muster consistent positions on the issue.

Listening to a 2003 Obama speech, it’s hard to believe he has become such an enigma. Back then, he declared himself “a proponent of a single-payer universal health care program”—i.e., one eliminating private insurers and their overhead costs by having government finance health care. Obama’s position was as controversial then as today—which is to say, controversial among political elites, but not among the general public. ABC’s 2003 poll showed almost two-thirds of Americans desiring a single-payer system “run by the government and financed by taxpayers,” just like CBS’s 2009 poll shows roughly the same percentage today.

Advertisement

In that speech six years ago, Obama said the only reason single-payer proponents should tolerate delay is “because first we have to take back the White House, we have to take back the Senate, and we have to take back the House.”

This might explain why when Illinois contemplated a 2004 health care proposal raising insurance lobbyists’ “fears that it would result in a single-payer system,” those lobbyists “found a sympathetic ear in Obama, who amended (read: gutted) the bill more to their liking,” according to the Boston Globe. Maybe Obama didn’t think single payer was achievable without a Democratic Washington. And when in a 2006 interview he told me he was “not convinced that (single payer) is the best way to achieve universal health care,” perhaps he was following the same rationale, considering his insistence that he must “take into account what is possible.”

Of course, even as a senator aiming for the “possible” in a Republican Congress, Obama promised to never “shy away from a debate about single payer.” And after the 2008 election fulfilled his single-payer precondition of Democratic dominance, it was only logical to expect him to initiate that debate.

That’s why the White House’s current posture is so puzzling. As the Associated Press reports, Obama aides are trying to squelch any single-payer discussion, deploying their health care point-person, Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., to announce that “everything is on the table with the single exception of single-payer.”

So it’s back to why—why Obama’s insurance industry-coddling inconsistency? Is it a pol’s payback for campaign cash? Is it an overly cautious lawmaker’s paralysis? Is it a conciliator’s desire to appease powerful interests? Or is it something else?

For a president who spends so much time on camera answering questions, these have become the biggest unanswered questions of all.

David Sirota is the bestselling author of the books “Hostile Takeover” (2006) and “The Uprising” (2008). He is a fellow at the Campaign for America’s Future. Find his blog at OpenLeft.com.

© 2009 Creators Syndicate Inc.


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By lazyboysofas, September 29, 2011 at 1:59 am Link to this comment

Yes, all the deals he cut were pretty strange. Unfortunately no public option either.

Report this

By Certified Nursing Assistant, May 31, 2011 at 2:55 am Link to this comment

Forcing people to have mandatory health insurance isn’t a bad thing considering a staggering 40 million Americans do not have health insurance because it costs so much to have a personal coverage. As it is the current health care system is not working for America, so before we all jump on the O-boo-ma wagon, ask yourself what you would do.

Report this

By KDelphi, June 3, 2009 at 10:38 am Link to this comment

Hawkeye—I dont think I can ever vote for a Democrat (NEVER for a GOP!) again.

This is worse than Clinton.

Report this

By Cathy, May 23, 2009 at 7:12 pm Link to this comment

Hawkeye—I’m sorry you’re getting this bad news.  Personally I’ll be working until I drop, being that I’m self-employed.  Everything is imploding or exploding—depending on the sector.  What a mess.  I found this blog for you:

http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/05/pension-benefit-guaranty-corporation.html

http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock News/2340265/

I don’t think there’s anymore information than what you got if you watched the hearings. 

Another bailout?  What we need is a massive clawback from the crooks—but I wouldn’t hold my breath.  The bad news just keeps coming. 

I wonder if I should hold my breath for the MSM to report on the May 30th Single-Payer Day Rallies?

Report this

By Cathy, May 23, 2009 at 2:25 pm Link to this comment

KDelphi—Bill Moyers is must-watch TV.  He explores all of the most important issues we are dealing with in-depth.  Other PBS shows have also been doing a great job on many of its shows when it comes to this.

I listen to NPR all the time and, I must say, when it comes to talking about health care along the same lines as PBS they are dropping the ball.  I didn’t hear anything about the Finance Committee meetings and the arrests.  It was pretty stunning.  I read about them first on HuffPo.

Report this

By KDelphi, May 23, 2009 at 11:47 am Link to this comment

Cathy—I saw that last night—he caters to his crowd. (Bill Maher)But, then, he brought up the abysmally lame “credit card bill”—everyone cheered, and, I thought, “oh no!”. Then, he admitted it was CRAP! Amd it is! My card has already switched me to a variable rate, and, I have thousanad of dollars of medical bills on there! Things will be WORSE for many of us! They shouldve admitted Sen Sanders amendment, concerning a limit on rates (15%—whic h is too high, but start).I’ve never missed a fricking payment in my life, even borrowing from friends and family to pay it, but, I’ll bet I do now…the next big CRASH.

Bill Moyers had Drs. Wolfe and Himmlestein on last night, (Public Citizen Health Research Giorups and OPhusciciand for natl Health Plan). I gave the link in the post before. It waS great.They explain much more eloquently than I could, why the plan being pushed by BaucASS and Pres. Obama just will not work…it will only bear out GOP fears.

I dont want to wait while 20,000 die every year (thats a low estimate) and Congress, and the president collect millions of dollars from the psychopathical health insurance industry.

Report this

By Cathy, May 23, 2009 at 8:38 am Link to this comment

Bill Maher was a major, major ra-ra supporter of Obama during the campaign on his show.  I found it pretty sickening, actually.  Well, last night he was in about-face mode on Real Time. 

I wonder when reality is going to hit the “he’s-only-been-in-office-X-days.”  I live with someone who says we should just sit back and wait and see what Obama does.  I answer that it’s not too early to hold Obama’s fee to the fire and make him listen to the will of the people.  After all, he is addressing all of these things right now—and it looks like it’s going to be pretty bad.

Report this

By KDelphi, May 20, 2009 at 1:33 pm Link to this comment

I just recieved an email from Physicians for a Natl Health Plan, that, Dr Himmelstein, co-founer , will be on pbs.org Bill Moyers , Friday, May 22nd. You can watch and comment here: (puhleeze!)

http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/index-flash.html

He was also on Dianne Rehm with Sen Sanders on Monday.: (she was a sell-out)

http://wamu.org/programs/dr/09/05/18.php#26151

Also, please write, even if you already have, your blah, blah, reps and sens…c’mon, I wrote to EACH ONE, individually! I am not kidding…

There is a (local) nationwide rally for single payer on May 30, in most major cities (the main one is in San Diego, where Ams Health Insurance Plans is meeting)

May 30th: National Day of Action
Nationwide Rallies for Improved Medicare for All

Join thousands of single-payer supporters in a nationwide week of action to support improved Medicare for all (HR 676). Single-payer activists will be gathering all over the country to say, “Healthcare, yes; Insurance companies, no,” and to show solidarity with demonstrations at the AHIP (American Health Insurance Plans, a private health insurance lobby) conference in San Diego.

http://www.healthcare-now.org/campaigns/may-30th-day-of-action/

The 20-60,000 people who get to live, because they recieved decent health care thank you!

Report this

By KDelphi, May 20, 2009 at 12:16 pm Link to this comment

Pass a law where no one is allowed to profit from the death of others..you know, like, you cant buy life insurnace on someone else’s life that you are not related to…

All “US industry” would be broke in a week, and the wars would stop.

Report this

By Bobby Libby, May 20, 2009 at 10:38 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The liberals and Obomba suck!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Report this

By KDelphi, May 20, 2009 at 10:10 am Link to this comment

Jim C—You may still get the emails..lol. You have to put change.gov.whitehouse.gov, etc, onto your spam alert, then you go there and, there it is!! Amazing…

I also still get requests for money from sites where I am banned (for now, then tomorrow, no, then again…lol) from posting!

Neo-liberal hypocrisy knows no bounds.

Report this

By DIOGENES REDUX, May 20, 2009 at 3:50 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

REF: JIM C


Actually, can we afford to accept the same old health care, expensive, costly and worse and worse? Well, hell no.

The system sux. Need some very radical surgery and do not re-elect one single Sob. Most should be indicted and stripped of their ill-gotten assets.

Brown in UK has the right idea, CHANGE THE SYSTEM! HE HAS IT RIGHT,IF HE ACTUALLY DOES ANYTHING.

Report this

By DIOGENES REDEUX, May 19, 2009 at 9:37 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

REF: samosamo

“I really believe that the ‘puppet masters’ decided early on to have a black person or a female become president as it would be the easiest way to get a more malleable puppet in the white house so there will not be much dickering about getting legislation passed, appointees will be processed with little objection which means the supreme court will most likely remain on the conservative side.

This country is so subverted that a fix is no where close to coming to pass.”
______________

Yes, indeed, because not only has he taken “One-Payer” health insurance “off the table,” it seems the same insurance that congress enjoys was never on the table. Just more election promises.

Looks like Max Baucus and the Repugs will give the keys to the kingdom to the phamas and insurance.

Same old BS. Sorry, the bankster and auto bailouts just broke emptyied the public treasury and now more credit. Crank up the printing presses, bills coming due.

Report this

By DIOGENES REDEUX, May 19, 2009 at 7:41 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

may 20

ref: health care system


both obama and mccain repeatedly proclaimed every american should have access to the same healthcare these senators enjoyed. that was a major point in the presidential race. but that was then and this is reality. it just a game, S O R R Y !

please note, the existing “health care system” is the largest part of the budget, not defense or anything else. even ross perot warned of this situation many years ago.

one-payer, equal health (or death) insurance would stop the absurd pretense of “private insurance.” it will take both single-payer plus non-profit status for participating insurance companies. it is the only possible way to stop the outlandish ripoff.

private health insurance companies like AIG or BCBS etc. cannot be trusted to regulate itself. any politician against single-payer should be denounced now and voted out, later. like the pharma and health care insurance poster boy, max baucus and all the repugs.

just say, no! vote with you dollars. boycott these insurance gangsters and their pupplet politicians (e.g., max baucus)

Report this

By samosamo, May 19, 2009 at 5:24 pm Link to this comment

By HighHopes, May 19 at 8:40 am
Hmm, Pink Floyd made a song with that title and remembering the lyrics brings me a nostalgia of sorts.

Then again their song ‘Dogs of War’ rains pretty heavy on these days and times as does ‘On the Turning Away’.

I remember well the latter part of 2003 and the 2004 campaign with promises about this and that and change and prosperity up until he caved into corporate america and the american izraeli public affairs committee by assuring both of his and america’s full support AND assuring me of voting 3rd party.

I wasn’t wrong either because his first 100 days did not produce the promised ‘fixes’ I thought essential for starting to turn these crises around and then it has developed into a landslide of cooperation of everything w & dick had done, with the people that elected him left out in the cold.

I really believe that the ‘puppet masters’ decided early on to have a black person or a female become president as it would be the easiest way to get a more malleable puppet in the white house so there will not be much dickering about getting legislation passed, appointees will be processed with little objection which means the supreme court will most likely remain on the conservative side.

This country is so subverted that a fix is no where close to coming to pass.

I have gotten more requests for donations from these blog sites of late than ever and that raises a concern about what that is all about other than needing money to operate but now they are adding that such and such amount needs to be raised in a couple of days or some other short time line and the requests are for $25-$50, makes me wonder even though I realize they need money, we all do.

Report this

By Jim C, May 19, 2009 at 5:45 am Link to this comment

Well , not quite everything else is on the table . Every single other country that has insurance companys in the mix makes them go non profit , I haven’t heard that mentioned either , go figure . An independent film maker did a series of documentaries on health care in countries around the world . He also did one on our ( gag ) system to be released in a series that was to be on PBS . When the series was getting ready to be aired PBS wouldn’t allow that fact to be mentioned in the film , the producer then told them he wouldn’t allow his name to be used with the series if that point was ommited , I’m not sure if it has aired yet or not . I heard of this on the Thom Hartmann radio program , I’m sure if anyone is interested in the story you could go to Thom Hartmans web site and his administrater would give you the information . I for one am losing patience with Obama , The democratic party sent me an e-mail asking for donations to help in his ” fight for health care ” , I’m sure some of you have recieved the same thing . I responded by having my name removed from their e-mail list . They asked why in the removal conformation . I sent them a scorching reply telling them among other things that if they wanted money they needed to get it from from those they were representing , the insurance companys . I would encourage anyone else who recieves such a request to do the same . We’ve got to let them know we’re awake , paying attention and that a growing number of us aren’t ga ga over Obams specious retoric .

Report this

By HighHopes, May 19, 2009 at 5:40 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I Don’t understand David Sirota’s puzzlement. He says:

Listening to a 2003 Obama speech, it’s hard to believe he has become such an enigma. Back then, he declared himself “a proponent of a single-payer universal health care program”

Enigma? What enigma? The article points out that Obama lied A politician lied to the public. How mysterious is that? If Bush or Cheney pulled this very same stunt no one would be waxing philosophically about enigmas. We’d recognize the ploy for what it is and know that they were pulling the wool over our eyes. The ploy is the ploy no matter who’s selling it.

Report this

By foggyjones, May 18, 2009 at 4:19 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The reason we should approve One-Payer is because that will serve as square one for two reasons. We are facing a national emergency due to the meltdown. Second, it will serve to prevent the insurance companies from getting bailouts to cover their trilions in bad investments, mostly “toxic mortgage assets.”

Report this

By Bill Jones, May 18, 2009 at 1:16 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Well. Mr Hopey Change is certainly packing in the betrayals thick and fast nowadays.

Report this
jpinsatx's avatar

By jpinsatx, May 18, 2009 at 7:03 am Link to this comment

Hmmm… Health Care for All Americans is Simple!

1) Merge Medicare with Medicade into one single “Income Based” system
for the elderly and poor.

2) Require insurance companies to provide the same basic coverage for
all Non-Medicare/Medicade American citizens, regardless of health
status, at government established rates.

3) Allow insurance companies to offer additional benefits and options
to those who qualify and are willing to pay the difference.

As for Funding…

1) Changing from an “Emergency Treatment” to a “Preventive Care”
system will save local communities billions, maybe even trillions of
taxpayer dollars!

2) Small business will be able to compete globally and hire additional
taxpaying employees!

3) Wealthy seniors will pay their fair share!

4) The tremendous burden on future generations will be greatly reduced!

Report this
Leefeller's avatar

By Leefeller, May 17, 2009 at 4:48 pm Link to this comment

Distractions are what the MSM is about, real issues of importance must be kept distant and well hidden, in the back pages of our minds. What war now noble?  Bail out lets change the name to….?  Torture, lets call torture….. enhanced tickling. National Medical Plan, .... well that would be Pinko socialism of course. 

Fostering Delusions for the deluded.  Promoting constant moods of hand wringing and fear.  Divisive challenges programed for creating sides,..... we must have sides.  Alleged differences, so necessary in the grand scheme of things. 

MSM, hired to be the runners, highlighters of these designed issues, paid help to designate priorities, so we have the return of the Gays and of course Abortion rights as the new old battle. so effective in the past for the GOP, attempting a come back from the dead, Newt stumbling from the GOP bone yard. Contriving issues with such design all old and dusty, sold as new special battles. Oh for the successes of the past, such past gratification, all created for their insidious distractions.

Choose your distraction!

Report this

By samosamo, May 17, 2009 at 3:05 pm Link to this comment

By foggyjones, May 16 at 7:41 pm
““i hope enough voters wise up in time to ignore this pelosi-cia red herring.  hope enough people realize how huge this matter of the impending health care bill in the congress really is. sen. baucus and cohorts are poised to speed this health care bill through late at night, just like the other bailouts and tarps etc.”“
****************************************************

Multi tasking - the concurrent performance of several jobs, usually by computer but can include the attempt to handle multiple issues all at once.

Just look at, well even TD’s site, and see how many different crises are vying for everyone’s attention and remediation and not in any set priority of importance and with the added attraction of ‘remedying’ each’s pet peeve before helping others with their particular peeve, much to the delight of those that want to maintain a high level of ambiguous courses of action all of it brought to the US by the MSM that is a conservative controlled resource.

As I say, there are many examples of this on most any blog sites where the curious go to see ‘watz up’ and add their 2cents worth to their pet peeves, I guess, to see who will side with whom on what ever subject, sort of like ‘we need to get to the bottom of this’ and then on the ‘we need to fex this thing’ which really creates an unambiguous display of disorganization.

And any of those who have read Scott Ritter’s ‘Waging Peace’ will remember the main theme is trying to organize to confront and gain the control by those that ARE organized and have put us in this disaster of multiple crises, any of which can be bumped into the bright lights to cover up something else that in not wanted of attention.

Report this

By hippie4ever, May 17, 2009 at 1:49 pm Link to this comment

Good writing. I loved this paragraph:

“In that speech six years ago, Obama said the only reason single-payer proponents should tolerate delay is “because first we have to take back the White House, we have to take back the Senate, and we have to take back the House.”

Seems like Obama has run out of excuses, but no, fear not! Politicians enjoy a symbiotic relationship with lobbyists, and the Insurance lobbys are among the fattest and most generous…to those who do their bidding.

Foggyjones, I liked your analysis for its completeness:

“Our politicians have sign a pact with the devil. Pay to play politics must be eradicated and intensely regulated. These people are a public hazard. The real terrorists appear on CSPAN, almost every day. They still do not have a clue. Even the protestor with the bullhorn pictured above changes their minds.”

The best government money can buy is all I can add. And don’t expect much from Obama.

Report this

By peabo, May 17, 2009 at 12:34 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

If you just pay attention to his actions and not to his speech Obama isn’t an enigma at all.  He’s a whore mouthpiece for the corporatists.

That’s why he included them.  He’s announcing that any significant savings won’t be at the expense of the parasitical profiteering level at all.

Peter Orzsag and his fellow Behavioral Economists are pushing “comparative effectiveness research.”  HMO style prescriptions will be written in stone.  Medical professionals giving medical advice based on their lifetime experience?  Forget it, comparative effectiveness research computer programs will spit out the treatments.

Un-effin-believable!! I can’t listen to that gaseous windbag at all anymore.  Does he know how close love and hate are?  One of the worst betrayals is that of a would-be champion turning out to be a fraud.

Report this

By yours truly, May 16, 2009 at 5:21 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Privatization Of Health Care Will Be A Killer

“Based on?”

“Except for Medicare (a single payer system) corporate health care already is dominant in America, yet last year 20,000 of us died for want of health coverage.”

“Cause of death?”

“Lack of a single payer health care plan.”

“Due to?”

“Corporate greed.”

“Anything else?”

“Big Money owns President Obama and Congress.”

Report this

By felicity, May 16, 2009 at 3:55 pm Link to this comment

foggyjones - and anyone else who’s awake and/or cares - today’s movers and shakers and deciders and present and future captains of industry are devoted and dedicated to accruing money, as much as they can and by any means possible. 

I arrived at this less than astounding revelation on hearing that for about the last 30 years the Ivies have been turning out products whose life-long ambition is making money - and high finance is where it’s made and that’s where they’ve headed.

Wall Street has screwed and is screwing us royally.  And with our elected respresenatives devoted as they are to the money keeping them in power as it is, we, the people of America, are now beside the point, merely the patsy’s who continue to fund them - no questions asked.

Other than marching in the streets, I see no way to make our dollars work for us rather than for them.

Report this

By Old Man Turtle, May 16, 2009 at 2:41 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

What the profiteering ‘providers’ and their politician/retainers know full-well, but the ‘patients’ remain blissfully ignorant-of, is there is not enough money in the world to ‘cover’ the ‘cost’ of medically suppressing all the symptoms of three hundred million people sickened-to-death from having to exist day-to-day in a continent-sized toxic waste dump.  “Single-payer” might prolong their collective agony a little longer, though the additional load on the system from people not now receiving anything like the required range of treatment will go a long ways toward ramping-up the public price-tag to it’s presently “unsustainable” ‘private’ levels. Societal bankruptcy is a dead-certainty, and much sooner than later, in either ‘case.’

There is absolutely no institutional ‘solution’ to “the health-care crisis.”  Even a massive effort to address the ubiquitous killing conditions that are making everybody sick will not reduce the sheer numbers of those already ‘sentenced’ to a lifetime of industrially induced illness.  Expect nothing from those ‘in-charge,’ however, but more of the same shit that served so effectively to bring things to this un-pretty pass in-the-first-place.

And ‘the public,’ confused and battered by propaganda, will keep on eatin’ it up.  That’s what their exploiters are betting on, anyhow, and they’re a whole lot better-informed about this mess than their disinformed exploitees.

Report this

By ocjim, May 16, 2009 at 2:28 pm Link to this comment

Foggyjones,

Americans have been effectively brainwashed by right-wing interests whose agenda wants to keep us apologetic for taking any government services.

Besides local services, certain services are absolutely required to even come close to fulfilling the equal opportunity principle our school children are told that we have. Among these services are an equal education, equal justice before the law,and equal access to health care. All are absolutely required to keep us on an equal footing.

We have failed miserably on all. Our education system is in shambles. Health care access is a disgrace. Our top leaders consistently break the law and do not share space in our crowded prisons with the poor and minorites.

Report this

By felicity, May 16, 2009 at 1:59 pm Link to this comment

I should mention that years ago when the insurance industry launched its campaign to convince us that we all needed health insurance - without it our very lives were in jeopardy - the main argument against the idea was that health care costs would become ‘hidden’ in insurance premiums.  And that in turn would result in an out-of-control rise in the fees charged by doctors/hospitals.

(When a doctor gives me a $1000 bill for 3 minutes of his time, I scream like hell.  When the same $1000 ‘hides’ in an insurance premium, I don’t scream.  Chalk it up to human nature.)

Well, it was a valid argument.  And here we are about to provide yet again another hiding place for the insurance industry/medical industry to rip us off - only this time it’s the politicians doing the hiding.

Report this

By felicity, May 16, 2009 at 12:55 pm Link to this comment

About a month ago Obama talking about health care threw out the word ‘legacy.’ Accompanied by a frown and a slight wince, the throw-out-word, I guess, was supposed to indicate that single-payer would present an unsolvable difficulty due to the legacy issue so forget about it. 

So what’s to come other than the tax-payer funded government paying big insurance zillions of (tax-payer dollars) to compensate the beasts for reducing their insurance premiums to us - probably by a single digit.  In other words, the beasts will get their zillions whether directly from our pockets (premiums) or by way of the taxes we pay to the government.  Substitute ‘ruse’ for ‘reform’ and you’ve correctly identified today’s health care proposals. 

I have a terrible feeling that America has entered its own Dark Age.

Report this

By KDelphi, May 16, 2009 at 11:16 am Link to this comment

Leefeller—Must be soothing to be able to delude yourself that way…lie down with dogs, get fleas, with insurance industry murderers, let patients (NOT “consumers”)get sick and die, I guess.

foggyjones—The rest of the “civilized” world does NOT see it as an ‘industry”. (Morally, I know that it is not)

When I was doing WorkCamp studies in Korsor, Denmark, I sprained my anklle…a good friend there took me to a doctor’s office/house, and, it was—the same size as just about everyone else’s! Being a dumbassmerkin, I was amazed at this. He treated me (didnt speask english—-its a rather small port/navy town), but Annetta translated. When he had x-rayed and treated me, I got out my wallet. I asked my friend, “HOw much do I owe him?” She looked surprised and said ‘Nothing….he’s a doctor”.

He was paid salary by the state, hence had no reason to treat people (nor operate on them, nor give them unnecessary drugs ) except the correct one.

As I left, he said something to Annetta. She said that he said, “Americans just dont get it, do they?”
No we do not…
I was also treated in Norway and Italy, as well as Canada. All were free, immediate and excellent.

A for-proft “health care indsutry” kills more ‘Merkins every year than wars. It is immoral. Insurance industry executives should be in prison, not in the White HOuse.

Report this

By rollzone, May 16, 2009 at 10:45 am Link to this comment

hello. because it is caring for people does not justify grotesque profiteering and waste. administration costs are also hyperinflated. the doctors are the only ones in the entire system that take a reasonable fee. PACs and special interest groups are the capitalist influencing of our politics: that do not belong and should be abolished; or limmitted to token $1 donations. political payback, belongs to the majority will: not the capitalist minority. the majority wants, and government represents. reform the triple billing; reform outrageous hospital(hotel)/nursing home fees; reform absurd malpractice judgements; an industry that fleeces the public in the name of goodwill is phony- and ought to be lambasted- for cruel profiteering, gouging, and financially crippling families for their own gain. this has been the greedy sick taking care of the sick. i’m headachy. i’m not going near a health institution. it has to be a catastrophic injury; and then they have me: to pillage and plunder. when i am at a disadvantage.

Report this
Leefeller's avatar

By Leefeller, May 16, 2009 at 3:21 am Link to this comment

One can hope, (that word again) that Obama is sleeping with the jackals of industry to find out what makes them tick, in this case the medical industry.

Taking single payer off the table, must be a ploy to get industry to show their real selves. The Medical complex is really like everyone else just people trying to make a living, so let them eat cake.

Taking something off the table before even sitting at the table, must have it’s uses in politics.  In the end it may turn out Obama’s sleeping with the jackals will show in the taking off the table, was really some more of our food.

Report this

By samosamo, May 15, 2009 at 11:21 pm Link to this comment

What can one say when this new brand of president(that is so quaint) in reality is still the old brand of president, same with congress because they are all just trying to get re-elected and to do so must fake it with the people with petty unctuous rhetoric that amazingly never fails to get the re-election as the ‘can’t decide either dem or repub’ citizens will botch the vote instead of looking at viable 3rd party hopefuls.

Obama is either a typical newly elected president that had no intention of following through on his campaign boasts or his has selected and appointed the type of people that give him ill advice for other agendas, but I will split 50/50 on that for now but everyday that goes by this guy does even more instill a nonconfidence in his position.

Report this

By ocjim, May 15, 2009 at 7:49 pm Link to this comment

KDelphi,

You are absolutely right. That is why private industry should not decide who gets health care and how much, no more than we should entrust fire protection to them for the copay they determine.

Health care is a right and should be administered by the government. For example, the French system is not only the best but also one of the most cost-effective systems in the world.

Report this

By TechnoShaman, May 15, 2009 at 7:44 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I think that sometime between the election and now (or maybe before and we were just sold a bill of goods) the powers that are told Mr. Obama that he would be toeing the corporate line or they would “Wellstone” him and his family.

Report this

By KDelphi, May 15, 2009 at 4:25 pm Link to this comment

The insurance industry is expected to act in its own interests—-that’s what the Capitalism you guys love so much is for—-self interest of the powerful and elite.

Our Congress (lemme see if I can do this without laughing) is supposed to represent the “people”.

Some matters are more important than others, but health care profiteering is no better than war profiteering. People die for profit. That is immoral.

Report this

By ocjim, May 15, 2009 at 4:18 pm Link to this comment

The health care industry, like most of big business, is so focused on self and so self-deluded, whether we are talking profits or the pay of its leaders, that they would willingly bring down the whole economy and actually believe it was the fault of anyone else.

Report this

By KDelphi, May 15, 2009 at 3:18 pm Link to this comment

Its about lobbying money from the insurance industry, David.

http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/contrib.php?cycle=2008&ind=F09

BC/BS:Blue Cross/Blue Shield
Blue Cross/Blue Shield also has a contract with the federal government to review and process Medicare claims. The association is lobbying Congress to make it harder for the government to penalize companies if their employees defraud the Medicare program and process false claims. Local Blue Cross chapters have paid about $340 million to the federal government to settle Medicare fraud charges since 1993.


More (BC/BS) (JUST BC/BS!):
Top Recipients
Senate Obama, Barack $116,909
Senate McCain, John $61,705
Senate Levin, Carl $48,100
Senate Clinton, Hillary $26,415

Senate Baucus, Max $14,100


Sen Baucus campaign donations, from the insurance industry:


(Here’s why Baucus is not doing the peoples business):

According to OpenSecrets.org over his career he has taken donations from:

The Insurance Industry: $1,170,313

Health Professionals $1,016,276

Pharmaceuticals/Health Products Industry $734,605

Hospitals/Nursing Homes $541,891

Health Services/HMOs $439,700

That is a grand total of $3,902,785. Can we trust Baucus to put aside the profits of the industries that have kept him in the senate? Will he put the people’s necessities ahead of the profits of his contributors? Baucus has shown his bias and should be removed from leading the health care reform effort by the Democratic Party leadership.

His 2008 donations from health care profiteers included:

Insurance $592,185

Health Professionals $537,141

Pharmaceuticals/Health Products $524,813

Health Services/HMOs $364,500

Hospitals/Nursing Homes $332,826

That is $1,826,652 Baucus took from industries who he can now make wealthier by deforming health care reform
And, it is not just the chairman of the committee who has received massive donations. In 2008 the full committee received a total of $13,263,986 from industries affected by health care reform. Can we trust this committee to put the interests of the people before their donors? The donations to the Finance Committee in 2008 included:

Insurance $5,103,900

Pharmaceuticals/Health Products $3,308,831

Hospitals/Nursing Homes $2,809,353

Health Services/HMO $2,041,902


It is time to remove Baucus from the leadership of health care reform. It is time to move the critically important priority of reforming America’s health care system from the Finance Committee and put it before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee. At least their mission is health care not money.

http://www.pnhp.org/news/2009/may/max_baucus_should_no.php

Why Pres. Obama is selling out “health care reform”:

Dr. David Himmelstein is a founder and spokesperson for Physicians for a National Health Program.

Himmelstein’s take — Obama is caving to the insurance industry.

“The President once acknowledged that single payer reform was the best option, but now he’s caving in to corporate healthcare interests and completely shutting out advocates of single payer reform,” Himmelstein said. “The majority of Americans favor single payer, and it’s the most popular reform option among doctors and health economists, but no single payer supporter has been invited to participate in the administration’s health care summit. Meanwhile, he’s appointed as his health reform czar Nancy-Ann DeParle, a woman who has made her living advising health care investors and sits on the board of many for-profit firms that have made billions from Medicare. Her appointment — and the invitation list to the healthcare summit — is a clear signal that the administration plans to propose a corporate-friendly health reform that has no chance of actually solving our health care crisis.”

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.