LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
November 25, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Age Trumps Youth in UC Tuition Dispute

Obama Risks Losing His Judicial Prize

Delay Worked for Kennedy

Books, Not Bombs

Refuse Allegiance to Coal

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Delay Worked for Kennedy
 * NEW! * Books, Not Bombs

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Freedom’s Fight: Part II

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
While America Aged

While America Aged

By Roger Lowenstein
$17.13

Ravens in the Storm

Ravens in the Storm

By Carl Oglesby
$16.50

more items

 
Reports

Model for an Accounting

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Apr 27, 2009

By Marie Cocco

His interest, President Barack Obama says, is “the achievement of a full, frank and just acknowledgement of the facts.”
   
His topic was the delicate question of what to call the slaughter of 1.5 million ethnic Armenians at the hands of Turkey during World War I, a festering historical sore no American president can genuinely hope to heal.
   
But Obama’s professed desire for a complete and just accounting raises the question: If it’s good for the Armenians, why isn’t it good for Americans? Why can’t we also have a “full, frank and just acknowledgement” of the facts surrounding torture and other moral horrors that were carried out in our name during the Bush administration’s global war on terror?

    History demands it.
 
Obama doesn’t want to bog his administration’s ambitious agenda down in partisan recriminations over past practices. Fair enough. But it does not follow that no official inquiry should be held. There is more to find out, because much information is still being kept secret—sometimes by the very perpetrators of the shameful practices, who press on in the courts, for example, to attain what they hope will be a permanent shroud.
   
A copious report by the Democratic staff of the House Judiciary Committee, released last month, provides a chilling compendium of what we know, and what we don’t.
   
We do not officially know whether the “enhanced interrogation tactics” used by the Bush administration were in fact criminal violations of federal statutes prohibiting torture and war crimes. We do not know what laws may have been broken through the use of “extraordinary rendition.” This was the practice of sweeping people up and transferring them to secret CIA “black sites” or to countries—Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Pakistan, for example—where torture is believed to be practiced.
   
We do not know how many people were jailed and interrogated in this system. Estimates range from 100 to 150 to “several thousand renditions of terror suspects,” the judiciary report says. We don’t know how a program of “rendition” that was occasionally used in prior administrations to deliver a suspect to face prosecution in a country where he was wanted on criminal charges metastasized into a global sweep of those who were detained for interrogation. We do not know what happened to “ghost” detainees held by the U.S. in Iraqi prisons—prisoners who were never registered or identified and, for all we know, disappeared.
   
We do not know the full extent of the warrantless wiretapping of Americans that continues, in some form, to this day.
   
Sweeping this all aside in the interest of moving on isn’t a mark of how mature our political system is. It is an indictment of it.
   
It acknowledges that we cannot withstand the clamor of television talking heads—that somehow the distraction of their empty chatter is as weighty in its consequence as the heinous acts that smear the nation’s reputation. Do we really want to surrender to the purveyors of partisan hot air? This is the ultimate capitulation. It shows us to be so weak that we really should worry about how this act of cowardice is perceived around the world.
   
We have a contemporary model for how to conduct a politically sensitive inquiry properly, without undue theatrics and with respect for classified information. It is the 9/11 commission, a sober and thorough panel that explored systemic failures that preceded the terrorist attacks and put to rest false claims—including the Bush administration’s contention that Saddam Hussein somehow was behind it. The panel operated outside the partisan hothouse of Congress, yet drew freely on the expertise of those inside and outside the government. Its final report became a best-seller, not because it inflamed political passion but because it was unconventionally—and thus, believably—dispassionate.
   
The Bush administration opposed the creation of the 9/11 commission, then resisted with much force many of the panel’s requests for information. In the end, determined lobbying by victims’ families and their acumen at airing their demands in the media forced officialdom to create the panel, and helped the commission surmount obstacles that were placed in its way.
   
Now we have no tearful widows or orphaned children to plead on television for a just accounting. But how we handle the grievances of the voiceless and confront our own misdeeds is yet another measure of our character. And yes, the whole world is watching.
   
    Marie Cocco’s e-mail address is mariecocco(at)washpost.com.
   
    © 2009, Washington Post Writers Group
   

Advertisement

TAGS:



Related Entries

Get truth delivered to
your inbox every week.

Previous item: Model for an Accounting

Next item: Model for an Accounting



Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Folktruther, April 29 at 5:20 pm #

The new Dem appraoch to sanitizing torture is the Truth Commission instead of trials.  Just as Cocco tried to sweep torture under the rug with a new 9/11 Commission, the Senate is now trying to di it with a Truth Commission.

Since the US still funds prisons around the world where torture is still being carried out, no real prosecution of it is possible.  The torture qeustion in the mainstream media is simply a public relations one, how to get rid of the issue as quickly and effectively as possible.

Report this

By samosamo, April 29 at 5:10 pm #

************************************
““We have a contemporary model for how to conduct a politically sensitive inquiry properly, without undue theatrics and with respect for classified information. It is the 9/11 commission, a sober and thorough panel that explored systemic failures that preceded the terrorist attacks and put to rest false claims—including the Bush administration’s contention that Saddam Hussein somehow was behind it. The panel operated outside the partisan hothouse of Congress, yet drew freely on the expertise of those inside and outside the government. Its final report became a best-seller, not because it inflamed political passion but because it was unconventionally—and thus, believably—dispassionate.”“
************************************

Clearly this marie cocco is nuts. The attack of 9/11 was never investigated by our government with any kind of truth and reality. Why? It would have exposed the truly guilty of their part in this crime. When w & dick were ‘made’ to testify, on their terms, part of those terms were to not to ask questions that would incriminate. Thus all w & dick had to do was use blank stares and nod their heads, basically. Sure is easy to ‘testify’ when you know you’re not going to be held accountable because the whole commission was rigged from the start. Subsequent other investigations by reputible people prove it was more than just 2 planes hitting the 2 towers. And the fall of all 3 buildings, who are you going to believe, them or your eyes? No, not investigating, prosecuting and punishing the real masterminds of this act will only ensure a future attack, most likely even worse as those masterminds have indicated.

Report this

By diamond, April 29 at 4:18 pm #

All you need to know about the 9/11 Commission can be summed up by one fact:
The budget for Paul Greengrass’ film ‘United 93’ was $18 million, the budget for the 9/11 Commission was $15 million. Both were very expensive lies. Anything the 9/11 Commission couldn’t lie about they left out. If the torture is investigated in the same way you will have a commission that claims everyone tortured was a terrorist and the torturers were ‘protecting the homeland’. You could call this ‘the Cheney doctrine’.

Report this

By Sabagio Mauraeno, April 29 at 9:17 am #

Nixon should have spent time in jail.  Also Johnson, Reagon, Bush I, Clinton and Bush II(pending).  Why so many? Because history tells(told) them they’d “get away with it.”  What do you have to say about that, Rupert Murdoch?

Sabagio Mauraeno, home alone trying to figure out how to program my dvd recorder.

Report this

By dihey, April 29 at 9:06 am #

I have called president Obama’s handling of “Torturegate” a colossal blunder.

Even before Obama released the torture memorandums he had decided that there would be no criminal investigations let alone prosecutions. He and his dumb advisers should have realized that the memorandums would trigger a tsunami of demands for investigations and prosecutions not only in the blogosphere but also in the MSM. For almost two weeks Keith Olbermann has kept Obama’s feet to the fire. Therefore, why release the memorandums and buy yourself a permanent Achilles heel? Or an assured place in the Hades of History?  To show how daring you are? The whole affair is not only a blunder, it is a textbook example of sheer stupidity.
Mr. Obama will forever be known as the president who thought that certain crimes should not (never?) be punished and that from a man whose hot air has breathed the word “accountability” on numerous occasions.

Report this

By Sabagio Mauraeno, April 29 at 8:38 am #

Model for an Accounting? Models of the Past? Models?  How soon we forget.  Jefferson Davis, Robert E. Lee and the Preservation of the Southern Way of Life, The Filipino Uprising. Judgment at Nuremberg? The HUAC ?  McCarthy and Joseph Welch Confrontation? The Warren Commission? The Kerner Commission? Nixon Impeachment hearings? Medgar Evers Trial?  , The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, Irangate, the Contras and Ollie North? What do all ot these have in common?  Each event was thought to be THE major challenge to The Union,  the American way of life and our Constitutional form of government. All had a Commission to make sure they didn’t happen again. None of the Principal Perps of the events spent time in jail.  Major Media demonstrates that it has no sense of history.

Sabagio Mauraeno home alone in DeKalb County Georgia, wondering if anybody out there ever cracks a history book these days.

Report this

By Crimes of the State Blog, April 28 at 6:03 pm #

Is this a sick joke?

The 9/11 Commission was the biggest cover-up in American history.

The two puppet leaders, Kean and Hamilton, wrote a book charging they were “set up to fail.”

Marie Coco knows better, but she is of course a paid “professional” mainstream journalist in the end.

9/11 OMISSIONS & DISTURBING FACTS

Report this

By foggyjones, April 28 at 5:11 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Since there is at least as many demo as reps ceo’s and politicians who would be jailed under strict RICO and fraud regulations, Obama is trying very hard to steer around this huge obstacle.

But it is not honest. It is wrong. Do the right thing and let the trials begin. The people demand satisfaction. Damn the mortgage bankers, investment bankers and their puppet politicans. Let the cards fall where they may. It must be done. The people are mad as hell and refuse to take it anymore. The mainstream media cannot sweep this under the rug. Now way.

Report this

By Shane, April 28 at 5:00 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Terrible.  9-11 Commission as a model?  A model for truth suppression maybe.  The 9-11 Commission’s report did not mention the collapse of building 7, one of three buildings dropped in the attacks and the only one not hit by an airplane.  I guess this means a future torture commission then would not mention Abu Garib.  I expected more of reporters from this site.

Report this

By Folktruther, April 28 at 1:29 pm #

What Cocco, and Truthdig, is suggesting here is to sanitize the truth about torture the same way the 9/11 commission sanitized the truth about 9/11.  However the US power system has become so corrupt that it would just raise questions and objectiions as the 9/11 farce did.  So, with marginal effects and more sanitizing rhetoric, Obama is going to contnue to Look Forward rather than Backward.

The front page NYTimes suggeted that we ‘move on from torture?’  The most likely outcome.  The US powerstructure is too barbaric, masequrading under the policies of Universal Good.

Report this

By oldlib, April 28 at 11:43 am #

If you look at a commision as a stimulas package for unemployed politicans it might prove usefull. But past commisions have proven to be less than adiquit in finding the truth.

Report this

By johnnyfarout, April 28 at 9:25 am #

This article is absolute rubbish. 911 was a rightist coup in the USA, as the center of a global cabal. What is wrong with this Cocco head? No one with a lick of common sense believed the commission. The crimes to be investigated include the 911 commission for god’s sake. O’Bama is in over his head in all this, but because of his Harvard education he still sounds good as we all drown along in the deceits decades old. Not to go on too big a bummer here, but, “Black man given worst job in America”, is about all the truth we’ll ever hear from the ruling elite.

Report this

By godistwaddle, April 28 at 7:31 am #

I suppose, like the 9/11 commission, this one, too, would be populated by right-wing scumbags eager to keep the peasants in line.

Report this

By godistwaddle, April 28 at 7:31 am #

I suppose, like the 9/11 commission, this one, too would be populated by right-wing scumbags eager to keep the peasants in line.

Report this

By omniadeo, April 28 at 7:07 am #

The 911 Commission as a MODEL? Now I’ve heard it all.

Ms. Cocco, as a reporter you might try, uh, reading about the commission. Start with:

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2009/04/not-only-did-bush-administration-adopt.html

But don’t forget these 206 timeline entries:

http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&investigations;:_a_detailed_look=911Commission

Can’t wait for the torture commission’s dimestore novel.

Report this

By diogenes, April 28 at 2:29 am #

Who are you trying to fool?

http://harpers.org/WhitewashAsPublicService.html

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.