LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
November 22, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Intelligentsia Against Intelligence

Throw the Money Changers Out of the Temple

Obama's Job Approval Slips Below 50 Percent

The Afghanistan Speech Obama Should Give (but Won't)

Claire Wasserman on Europe's Islamic Immigrants

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Enough G-2 Talk Already
Despite Subsidies, Class Sizes Rise in California Schools

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Freedom’s Fight: Part II

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
The Inheritance

The Inheritance

By David E. Sanger
$17.79

Keeping in Touch

Keeping in Touch

By Ellen Goodman

more items

 
Reports

Seattle’s Lessons for London

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Mar 31, 2009

By Amy Goodman

  Protests dominate the news as world leaders gather in London for the Group of Twenty meeting. War, the economy, corporate globalization and grass-roots opposition to financial bailouts are at the forefront.

  Executives receive golden parachutes while workers and unions are forced to make concessions. President Barack Obama has inherited a slew of deep, interlocked crises, yet elicits broad global hope that he can be an agent of change.

  Obama last week held an “Open for Questions” town hall meeting, streamed online, with questions posed by the public and voted on to rank their popularity. Obama answered a question about marijuana:

  “Three point five million people voted. I have to say that there was one question that was voted on that ranked fairly high and that was whether legalizing marijuana would improve the economy and job creation. And I don’t know what this says about the online audience ... this was a fairly popular question; we want to make sure that it was answered. The answer is, no, I don’t think that is a good strategy to grow our economy.”

  That question’s popularity might indicate audience concern with U.S. drug policy, and the enormous toll on our society of the so-called war on drugs.

Advertisement

  I am traveling around the country this spring, visiting more than 70 cities. In Seattle, I interviewed a strong critic of U.S. drug laws, who said, “I ... support the legalization of all drugs.”

  These words come from an unlikely advocate: former Seattle Police Chief Norm Stamper. Stamper is an advisory board member of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws and a speaker for the organization Law Enforcement Against Prohibition. He explained:

  “We have spent a trillion dollars prosecuting that war ... and what do we have to show for it? [D]rugs are more readily available today at lower prices and higher levels of potency than ever before. So it’s a colossal failure. And the only way to put these cartels out of business and to restore health and safety to our neighborhoods is to regulate that commerce as opposed to prohibiting it.”

  As Stamper pushes for reform, his successor as Seattle police chief, Gil Kerlikowske, is, as Stamper blogged, “on his way to the other Washington to assume the mantle of ‘drug czar’ ... to make his case for a continuation of the nation’s drug laws.”

  Secretary of State Hillary Clinton admitted recently, en route to Mexico, “Our insatiable demand for illegal drugs fuels the drug trade.” It also fuels a rising U.S. prison population (some cash-strapped states are simply releasing nonviolent drug offenders to save money), the militarization of the U.S.-Mexico border, and the epidemic of drug-related violence in Mexico. Drug cartels purchase AK-47 assault rifles and other arms in the United States, then smuggle them into Mexico. Paul Helmke, president of the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, told me recently, “The folks in Mexico have figured out what criminals in the U.S. figured out a long time ago: Our weak and nearly nonexistent laws in the U.S. are making it very easy for these guns to get to Mexico.”

  With the increasing state-by-state acceptance of the medical uses of marijuana, with decriminalization of possession of small amounts in various jurisdictions and with the high cost of imprisonment versus treatment, public sentiment seems disposed to favor a change.

  It took Stamper years to learn the hard lessons of the failed war on drugs. Hard lessons seem to be his forte.

  He was the Seattle police chief during the World Trade Organization protests of 1999: “I made major mistakes leading up to that week and during that week. ... Not vetoing a decision to use chemical agents, also known as tear gas, against hundreds of nonviolent demonstrators.” He now sounds more like one of the WTO protesters his forces tear-gassed: “We’re now reaping what we have sown in the form of unbridled globalization and unfettered free trade ... it’s time for all of us in this country, as we attempt to pull ourselves out of this global economic meltdown, to really take a look at what issues of social and economic justice mean within the context of globalization.”

  The leaders of the G-20 in London, and those at the NATO summit to follow, have an opportunity to learn from Norm Stamper, to instruct their security to put away the Tasers and the tear gas, and to shock the world by seriously considering the voices of the protesters outside.

  Denis Moynihan contributed research to this column.
 
  Amy Goodman is the host of “Democracy Now!,” a daily international TV/radio news hour airing on more than 700 stations in North America. She was awarded the 2008 Right Livelihood Award, dubbed the “Alternative Nobel” prize, and received the award in the Swedish Parliament in December.

  © 2009 Amy Goodman

  Distributed by King Features Syndicate


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By cindy darrah, April 7 at 8:08 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

when driving thru mexico, we saw many, many checkpoints that were not there a year ago;  i think part of the economic collapse has resulted from so much of our resources being wasted on militarism outside and inside the country supposedly for the sake of security.
maybe our government will have an autoimmune disease: i.e. people will defund the government to the point there will be no money to run the imperalist police state ala liberatarianism?

Report this

By KDelphi, April 3 at 12:39 pm #

“War on ____” = war on the poor.

Even the “war on poverty” , which, btw, was extrtemely short-lived, became a neo-liberal war on the poor. (We feel your pain)The US is so convinced of individual exception, that, despite, its “place of honor” among industrialized nations, as the begatter of the greatest wealth disparity in modern history. USAns actually loathe the poor. How else to explain that, even the first Af Am elected US president, rarely (if ever, in seriousness) mentions the words “poor” or “poverty”. No, they are the “aspiring middle classes”!

Even at the G-20, the “poor” are discussed as the “starving children in Africa” scenario—NOT that they dont exist! To be sure, they do! But, it tends to make ‘Merkins focus on some “far-off” scenario, while convincing ourselves that the person who has slept in the park down the street for 8 yrs, really just “wants to be there”.

The $1.5 trillion for the IMF—well, we know the IMF’s history—its neo-liberal. They will be Trojan Horse loans (when we should be doing debt forgiveness), and will “open up markets” (whee!!)for the uS, EU, China, etc.

Globalization, big corporate basilouts, tax cuts, “free” trade, all of these have gotten us where we are today. Insanity is doing more of the same an expecting a different result. De-globalization is not shutting out the world, It is reaching out to he world with something green other than money.

Report this

By Thomas, April 1 at 6:45 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Somehow organised crime escaped with bare notice; that’s what money buys and it was well spent in shaping the agenda of this particular debate. If cannabis were legalised we would as a society benefit greatly by tax revenues that would eventually balance the budget; however a small number of extremely powerful and rich “individuals” and “families” would lose out. And politicians are always for sale, from the President on down. This is why Obama has disappointed progressives; he knows it’s wrong but that’s the way the system and government operates. This should remain a core debate among progressives because Obama isn’t going to fix it and I think we all know that now.

Report this

By samosamo, April 1 at 6:08 pm #

“”“With the increasing state-by-state acceptance of the medical uses of marijuana, with decriminalization of possession of small amounts in various jurisdictions and with the high cost of imprisonment versus treatment, public sentiment seems disposed to favor a change.”“”

Well don’t count on that. Those people that have subverted the whole world for their profit will just figure out or have figured out that keeping it illegal will help the growing ‘private prison’ industry that is fast becoming another of america’s industrial base just as arms and munitions are.
So, wouldn’t this support the idea that a very few control what they want that profits them more than others?
And how damn hypocritical can truthdig get by allowing advertizers to use this place and have the gall to advertize for an ‘Addiction Cure Center-Malibu,CA’ at the bottom of the article on marijuana. A Center of the Addiction to Money Center’ would be a much more appropriate advertizement.

Report this

By squeaky jones, April 1 at 6:04 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Obama your like the rest. The embargo against the Cuban people will continue, just like this harmful war on drugs. Your never going to ever win the Profile In Courage award; because, it takes courage to stand up against these destructive policies, which you have none.Squeaky.

Report this

By NYCartist, April 1 at 5:04 pm #

I just read the Amy Goodman article.  I heard the show with her interview with Stamper http://www.democracynow.org

My reaction to his “conversion” was, especially when he spoke of how the police might have traveled, “if” there had been an emergency, that they could have gone another way, instead of attacking the nonviolent, peaceful demonstrators who were alleged to have been blocking the police way….What do the people who were tear gassed with their children have to say about this “conversion”?  Was there a lawsuit with cash payments, paid by the city?  I remember listening to WBAI 99.5FM noncommercial radio in NYC, on the day of the attacks by the police. Amy Goodman was describing what happened, shortly after some of the events, live, on the air.  It’s easier to be “sorry” for past behavior, when you’re selling your book.

Report this

By Cybele, April 1 at 1:20 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I agree with some of your contentions, however, anyone who contends that the source of weapons used by the drug gangs on the border is the US is only partially correct.  Automatic weapons are simply NOT AVAILABLE to the overwhelming majority of american citizens.  Unless you are a serving member of the military, or in a SWAT-type unit of the police or federal government, or possess a nearly impossible-to-procure class-III BATFE license, fully automatic weapons are unavailable for purchase.  PERIOD.  The types of weapons that ARE legal for civilians to own (hence, for civilian dealers to sell) are either not automatic weapons at all by their design, eg:  12-gauge shotguns, revolvers; or they are SEMI-automatic in design, eg:  ak-47 clones, ar-15’s.  The rifles in use by the drug gangs and others are fully automatic weapons ... ergo, they did not get them from american civilian weapons dealers.

So, where did they get them ?

The ak-47 clones were heavily produced by nations virtually all over the world, there are literally millions of them in existence.  Do you believe, even for one minute, that a business inherently dependent on smuggling could not figure out a way to smuggle full-automatic weapons into a country for their comrades to use ?

Of greater concern is the question of where they got the US weapons.  The m-16’s and m-14a’s they got from the Mexican military, and the Mexican military got them from OUR military, as either military surplus or by direct grant from the DoD.  The ak-47 variants imported by the gangs we can do nothing about, it is an internal Mexican problem.  The sourcing of the US weapons to the drug gangs IS something we can demand answers about.  Therefore, if people are concerned about US automatic weapons falling into the hands of merciless killers along the southern border, perhaps they should be asking themselves and others the following question:  Just exactly why is our government wasting our tax monies and endangering the lives of our citizens by giving weapons to one of the most heavily corrupt militaries on the planet, when it is known that some in that military are then selling them to the drug gangs ?

Question:  Who benefits from distorting the source of these weapons?

Answer:  Those with an agenda to pursue in defiance of easily verified fact.

It is ABSOLUTELY essential for the continuance of our liberty that intelligent, literate, open-minded citizens discover for themselves the egregious disinformation, propaganda, and outright lying the anti-gun folks spew, on a nearly daily basis.

Report this

By mlb, April 1 at 11:57 am #

Obama has already made plenty of disingenuous, deceptive, and even flatly dishonest statements, but his response on the marijuana question was the first time I’ve seen him display a frightening callousness and outright stupidity.  A man who is willing to publicly laugh at and ridicule tens of millions of Americans, and make light of a “war on drugs” policy that has unnecessarily ruined the lives of millions more, (and most hypocritically, could have ruined his own life had he been caught and charged!) does not deserve to be president. 

Obama’s mistake was just as egregious on the purely pragmatic level.  Legalizing drugs could turn a $20 billion/year government expense into a multi-billion dollar/year revenue stream through the taxation of marijuana.  He’s willing to hand over trillions to Wall St. crooks, spend hundreds of billions more killing people around the world on behalf of US imperialism, waste billions on a corporate-based for-profit health care system, and cause hardship by cutting comparatively tiny social programs, but he laughs off this serious opportunity.  Talk about penny-wise pound-foolish!

(That $20 billion is a rough number that includes only direct costs of the war on drugs.  So far I haven’t been able to find a good comprehensive estimate of the total cost per year of the war on drugs, one that includes legal and prison costs,  the cost of removing productive workers from society, etc.)

Obama is obviously an extremely intelligent and capable guy, and I believe he knows the difference between right and wrong, but he needs seriously reconsider his decision to sell his soul.

Amy Goodman, on the other hand, is a treasure!  Democracy Now! is a great show with an unending stream of brilliant outspoken guests (like Truthdig’s Robert Scheer!) and regularly covers topics and points of view that are never aired by corporate media and only rarely by PBS and NPR aside from Bill Moyers, who happens to be a big fan of DN!.

Report this

By tp, April 1 at 10:17 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

It is sad to see an issue as important as this one trivialized. It just goes to show that politics is a nasty game. Obama knows this issue very well but also knows that if he takes the side of legalization that it will put a back lash on his popularity.
  The propaganda which has been used on American since ‘Refer Madness’ back in the late forties has taken it’s toll on this issue. It is political suicide to take a positive stand on ‘passing’ the ‘joints’. However, it would help eliminate clear cutting in forest to make paper by using hemp instead of pine trees if Marijuana and all drugs were legalized and regulated by the government instead of drug lords in the mafia.
  There was a better way for Obama to respond but he chose to avoid the issue altogether with a little joke. Drugs are not a joking matter to people whose lives have been destroyed and the lives that are being lost on the borders of US/Mexican border.
  Propaganda goes a long way. The public needs an education. How do you do that? The only way I can think of is for courageous politicians to speak the truth. Obama didn’t.
tp

Report this

By greenferret, April 1 at 7:02 am #

It’s time to end the failed, destructive policy of marijuana prohibition.
Tell Obama and your elected representatives that marijuana should be legalized and taxed: http://tinyurl.com/LegalizeTaxIt

Report this

By Xntrk, April 1 at 12:59 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Stamper was a typical hard line Chief of Police, pretty well known as a law and order or else advocate. What is truly amazing about his reformation is that he has gone public with it big time. He never misses an opportunity to speak out against the excesses of of the Three Strikes You’re Out Gang.

It is a big loss to the country that Obama refuses to listen to anyone to the left of Atilla Thhe Hun!

Report this

By Ed Harges, March 31 at 10:40 pm #

Wow. This is an amazing transformation. It’s St. Paul on the road to Damascus. I’m so happy to see that someone can come to his senses like this.

Report this

By freedom loving american, March 31 at 8:25 pm #

Hi Amy, just want to thank you for all you do.  You are a true patriot and a real American hero!

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.