|
|
May 22, 2013
|
|
Finding Peace in the Culture WarsPosted on Mar 5, 2009Will ending the culture wars be as difficult as repairing a broken economy? If President Obama’s primary task is to restore economic growth, he has also been waging a quiet, long-term campaign to ease the nation’s divisions around religious and moral questions. That venture, which has its roots in a 2006 speech that paid tribute to the political role of religious Americans, bore fruit in last year’s election. Obama increased the Democratic share of the vote among Roman Catholics and younger evangelical Christians. Since assuming the presidency, he has pressed this effort through persistent calls to personal and family responsibility, a pledge to continue social service partnerships between government and faith-based groups, and a promise to pursue policies to reduce the number of abortions. But two of Obama’s recent decisions underscored how brokering cultural peace will keep presenting him with ticklish challenges. Advertisement Such conscience protections have long applied to doctors, nurses and others who refuse to play any role in an abortion, and the administration has indicated it will maintain these safeguards. But it is likely to narrow the Bush regulation significantly so it doesn’t get in the way of family planning services and fertility treatments. Then, Obama set off a loud skirmish among Roman Catholics by nominating Gov. Kathleen Sebelius of Kansas to be his secretary of health and human services. Sebelius, like Obama, has advocated abortion reduction, but she vetoed a series of bills favored by anti-abortion groups, including restrictions on late-term abortions and parental consent laws. Last May, Archbishop Joseph F. Naumann of Kansas City called on Sebelius to stop taking communion because of what he described as “her long-standing support for legalized abortion.” Conservative Catholic groups quickly denounced the nomination. “She is the champion of abortion rights right through term,” said Bill Donohue, president of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, “and for Obama to choose somebody who has sown such division within the Catholic community to head HHS really is an insult to Catholics.” But it was a sign of how much the religious landscape has changed that even before the conservatives launched their assaults, more liberal Catholics began rallying to Sebelius. Catholics United, a progressive group, immediately issued a statement signed by 25 prominent Catholics—including three priests—describing Sebelius as “a woman of deep faith” who had expanded adoption programs, financed social services for pregnant women, promoted alternatives to abortion and signed a bill making the killing of a fetus a separate crime if a pregnant woman was murdered. At the same time, a largely evangelical group, including the Rev. Joel Hunter and David Gushee, president of Evangelicals for Human Rights, put out its own pro-Sebelius statement noting that the abortion rate in Kansas declined 10 percent during her time in office. The rapid mobilization behind Sebelius marked the emergence of an organized movement of religious progressives as a forceful counterweight to religious conservatives, and the case made on her behalf brought home the centrality of abortion reduction to the overall argument. This has made some traditional feminist groups nervous, as did Obama’s decision to give his Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships a mandate to make decreasing the number of abortions a part of its mission. Obama went out of his way to include opponents as well as supporters of abortion rights as members of the council. Thus Obama’s balancing act in moving to alter the Bush conscience rules, which reassured family planning and pro-choice groups. The president has cast his effort to reduce polarization around moral questions as a search for “common ground.” Many of the religious liberals the new president has mobilized say the minimum requirements for this quest include maintaining the strong conscience protections on abortion for health professionals and guarantees that federal money not be used to pay for abortions. If Sebelius is confirmed, one of her early challenges could come on the question of whether abortion coverage should be part of a universal health insurance proposal. Given the opposition in Congress to any federal funding for abortion, this issue could go away. Obama almost certainly hopes that it does. His success as a cultural peacemaker depends on his ability to move the country’s moral discussion toward social justice and economics. Paradoxically, perhaps, he’d rather have citizens thinking about taxes and collapsing banks than abortion. E.J. Dionne’s e-mail address is postchat(at)aol.com. © 2009, Washington Post Writers Group New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By Sepharad, March 11, 2009 at 12:24 pm Link to this comment
Speaking as a non-religious Jewish woman who is neither anti-life nor punisher-of-pregnancy, I see a reflection of what I do believe in Ms. Sibelius—i.e., increasing resources to help pregnant women (through the pregnancy, with job skills, etc) and expanding adoption programs. Most of the women I hang out with call themselves pro-lifers and we have some fierce arguments because I Planned Parenthood programs and “Our Bodies Our Own” do not do adequate jobs of informing women that abortions are not like having your tonsils out in that you can be hit by wave after wave of remorse and guilt. I never thought much about that aspect myself until decades ago—way pre Roe v. Wade—an editor assigned me to write a story following up a sampling of D.C. women of varying religious convictions post-abortion. I was irritated at first, thinking the assignment was his chauvinistic way of telling me that women should not be doing the political stories that were basically my beat, but my stung vanity healed quickly after I’d started listening to these women in one-on-one interviews. Only a few had gotten abortions to end a minor inconvenience to their lifestyle; most had done it for economic and personal reasons. But what showed up in common was a horrific sense of guilt imposed not by other peoples’ opinions but coming from within their own perceptions. Two women said they had and still were considering suicide. The majority said they regretted the decision even though they’d been unable to figure a way out, and many of them said they had trouble sleeping, wept a great deal and were distracted from their daily life as long as three years after the abortion. Only a couple had actually sought counseling. A minority of all women were fine with it, and moving on with their lives. After completing this story, I asked the editor if I could do a sidebar on pre-abortion counseling. Most Planned Parenthood personnel (in D.C. and Maryland) said that they did counsel women but when asked to be more specific, mentioned things such as life began at this or that point and the fetuses weren’t there yet as well as emphasizing the upside of having an abortion, the taking control of your own life thing. So essentially no one had bothered telling these women that they might have these powerful guilt feelings, whether hormonal or from their cultural tradition or from someone’s thoughtless comment. Sibelius, as a Catholic and as an understanding human being will doubtless be aware of repairing this little corner of a big cultural war.
Report thisBy Leefeller, March 10, 2009 at 1:54 pm Link to this comment
People like Limbaugh’s and some posters will never be happy unless Obama fails, so they can do their “I told you so’s”, while preforming the happy dance.
Though I do not walk in goosestep with Obama, I would never expect to. Ugliness of politics seems to come from the swill they love to swim in, seems most are self promotional windbags, with little feelings for the people, only and unless they have to.
My feelings about this article are still up in the air, we may need to wait and see?
Report thisBy Shenonymous, March 9, 2009 at 7:50 pm Link to this comment
godistwaddle, are you an American citizen and do you live in America?
Robert, this could come as much of a surprise to you as it did to me, because we have had some not so kind words to each other elsewhere, but I agree precisely with what you said. The notion of freedom within a society does not mean anarchic absolute freedom. In a “free” society, freedom does not mean unlimited since, if it did, everyone would have the same chaos-producing unlimited freedom and no conflicts could possibly be negotiated if one exercise of freedom that infringed on another’s. Therefore, in a responsible society, there are conventionally agreed-to limits to freedoms. The right to freely choose a religion or to choose no religion is hallowed. However, insisting another choose a particular religion is anathema.
Report thisSepharad, I will be sure to light candles in the dark so that I may curse! A good piece of advice. Thanks.
By Robert, March 9, 2009 at 4:40 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
It won’t end for me until the religious right accepts the fact that they can choose for themselves not to marry a spouse of their own gender, but that they cannot make that decision for others. Their religious freedom does not include promoting discrimination against others under the law.
Pure and simple.. No compromise.
Ending the culture war does not mean compromising on equality. And if, by not compromising, the war continues, then so be it.
Report thisBy Sepharad, March 9, 2009 at 11:13 am Link to this comment
Shenonymous—You’re right. And so was my Grandma who said “Don’t curse the dark if you haven’t lit a candle yet.” Will try to be more rationally hopeful in future.
Report thisBy godistwaddle, March 8, 2009 at 10:10 am Link to this comment
In right-wing America (that is, America), any decent woman will abort her fetus rather than birth it into this hell.
Report thisI’ll not abandon the culture wars until presidents stop giving money to “faith-based” perverts, con-artists and social misfits to proselytize their Iron Age filth.
By Shenonymous, March 7, 2009 at 10:06 am Link to this comment
It is not surprising that no matter what is said, detractors will find something to whine about. There is no question that this country has been left with the greatest possible of social poverties from the contemptuousness of the politicians in charge, and there is no argument politicians from both sides of the aisle are responsible. The politicians on the fence, the independent speakers, regardless of how noble their disposition, and while they may have steel scaffolding in their own districts, and often a cultish following on a larger scale, their voices where it counts, in Congress, are almost negligible. They may only remind their colleagues to have consciousness and a conscience as they go about commandeering the affairs of this country.
This article attempts to give voice to the slightest crack of light into a condition this country has suffered what seems interminably long. The two actions that the article references that chinks away at all of the conservative administrations of the past, not only that of the Bush administration, make no mistake, was indeed immorally based in stifling religious dogma. Putting an end to the Bush administration’s completely non-secular, meaning religious, and ultra conservative almost autocratic force in national politics that unconscionably authorized “allowing health care workers to decline to participate in actions that violate their moral or religious beliefs.” President Obama’s next auspicious act to jettison religious oppression of a free people was to appoint Kathleen Sebelius, Kansas Governor, to be his secretary of health and human services and which particularly bodes well for women. The pendulum swings left for a change. Read the entire article above for more description of her advocacy of all peoples rights! Or for her abilities to “run” things visit http://www.governor.ks.gov/about/bio.htm
From what I read in comments so far, it is the same old same old grumbling that is incessant and backward looking rather than looking forward to a more enlightened life for everyone except of course those entrenched in their own myopic conservatism and religious bubbles.
Report thisBy Sepharad, March 6, 2009 at 9:16 pm Link to this comment
Culture wars will be irrelevant if Obama’s crew can’t solve the increasingly-unsolvable-looking economic problems and get health services for every American who needs them.
Report thisBy sophie, March 6, 2009 at 2:19 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
“Paradoxically, perhaps, he’d rather have citizens thinking about taxes and collapsing banks than abortion.”
Report thisUnless that “citizen” is a woman with an unwanted or compromised pregnancy. As far as the issue of abortion is concerned, it is not going away, regardless of what Obama does. Women have abortions for many reasons, yet the inference always seems to be that a woman’s decision is somehow decided on a self-centered whim.
We have federal money for faith based garbage, but not for a woman who needs an abortion. It’s sickening that a woman’s private reproductive health should be considered fodder for political pandering.
By wildflower, March 5, 2009 at 5:20 pm Link to this comment
I believe Obama is going to have a hard time ending the culture war.
Just earlier today, I heard a MSNBC clip of Republican Wamp of TN ranting about Obama’s healthcare goals and sharing a Republican’s perspective:
“Health care is a privilege,”
“It’s not necessarily a right.”
Wamp didn’t say if disease like healthcare was also a privilege.
Oh, well, guess when you consider the definition of privilege, it pretty much sums up the Republican position on healthcare. My dictionary defines privilege as:
1. an advantage, right, or benefit that is not available to everyone.
2. the rights and advantages enjoyed by a relatively small group of people usually as a result of wealth or social status.
3. a special treat or honor
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/
Report thisBy dihey, March 5, 2009 at 4:08 pm Link to this comment
Please spare me the vile nonsense of “culture war”.
“Faith Based Initiative”? More money into black holes.
Report thisBy Folktruther, March 5, 2009 at 2:06 pm Link to this comment
By the issue ‘going away’, Dionne means not funding abortion and birth control. Like Dionne, Obama is sstriving to get progressives to support right wing policies.
Report this