LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
February 11, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Frightening Charts From the Senate Inequality Hearing

Morris Berman and the Decline of America

More From Chris Hedges on Black Bloc

Perfection

Truthdigger of the Week: 9th Circuit Judge Stephen Reinhardt

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Political Divide

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

Mr. Inside

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Share
Posted on Feb 13, 2009
Geithner
AP photo / Gerald Herbert

By Eugene Robinson

  Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner will get much better at making his case to Congress and the American people. I’m confident in that prediction because after watching his debut this week, I don’t see how he could get much worse.

    Reviews of Geithner’s performance in rolling out the Obama administration’s financial rescue plan were so uniformly negative that to add my own would be piling on. Too much of the criticism, in any event, focused on style rather than substance. Geithner will inevitably become more comfortable speaking from a witness chair on Capitol Hill, which means he will begin to sound more confident and authoritative. The fact that he looks so young—kind of like “Doogie Howser, Cabinet secretary”—is something that he’s going to have to learn to use to his benefit, and that we’re just going to have to get used to.

    What I hope he learned this week is how closely Americans are following the economic crisis and how angry they are. Geithner rose to prominence in the financial world at a time when it was assumed that brainiacs were running economic policy in Washington and major financial institutions on Wall Street. What did it matter that no one understood a word Alan Greenspan said? There was no need for regular folks to worry about the details.

    To put it mildly: Wrong.

    It will be a long, long time before it’s acceptable for a treasury secretary, Federal Reserve chairman, corporate CEO or anyone else who plays a powerful role in the economic life of the country to go up to Capitol Hill and say, essentially, “Trust us, we’ve got this.” But by presenting a plan that was all broad outlines and no fine print, that’s just what Geithner did.

Advertisement

    The most important reaction wasn’t the stock market’s sudden swoon—nearly 400 points in the Dow—following Geithner’s appearance Tuesday before the Senate Banking Committee. Remember, his rationale for unveiling the new bailout plan before it was fully baked was to calm the markets. I suspect, though, that Wall Street wouldn’t have been happy unless Geithner had announced that his only new initiative would be to dump huge piles of money on street corners in lower Manhattan every morning. Unmarked bills, of course.

    Geithner should pay more attention to the unrequited, Old Testament wrath that seems to be brewing over the financial crisis. I know it’s dangerous to generalize from anecdotal evidence, but I have to pay attention when, as happened earlier this week, an obviously intelligent, otherwise reasonable-sounding gentleman leaves me a voice mail message calling for “public executions” of Wall Street miscreants.

    As president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Geithner was a Wall Street insider. It’s probable that only an insider could understand the complexities of the financial crisis well enough to find a solution. But as treasury secretary, he’s now working on behalf of a nation of outsiders.

    From an insider’s perspective, it’s easy to understand how imposing strict, loophole-free compensation limits at firms receiving bailout funds might give executives a disincentive to participate in the program. This is a position that Geithner reportedly argued within the administration. But when we outsiders learn, for example, that Merrill Lynch paid year-end bonuses of more than $1 million each to 696 employees, we are not inclined to lose sleep over measures that might cause Wall Street tycoons to shy away from the public trough.

    The biggest tactical error that Geithner made was to address the Wall Street crisis before even formulating, much less articulating, the administration’s program for aiding Americans who are in trouble with their mortgages—again, seeming to have more empathy for the insiders than the outsiders. This is putting the cart before the horse—and the cart, destined for Wall Street, is laden with a staggering $1.5 trillion, while the horse, anxiously awaited by many thousands of desperate families, is still just a rumor.

    Geithner has an incredibly tough job to do. The treasury secretary is always an important figure, but rarely such a public figure. The right tone for speaking about the economic crisis is elusive; even Obama, one of the most effective communicators we’ve seen in many years, seemed to find his voice on the subject only at the town hall meetings he conducted this week in Indiana and Florida.

    Maybe Geithner should deliver his next economic update from a living room in a foreclosure-ridden neighborhood. Among the outsiders.
   
  Eugene Robinson’s e-mail address is eugenerobinson(at)washpost.com.

   
    © 2009, Washington Post Writers Group



Get truth delivered to
your inbox every week.

.

Previous item: Israel's Lose-Lose Election

Next item: Addicted to Fake Outrage



Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By nodrama, February 19, 2009 at 1:42 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Bertil—I think you’re on to something with Eddie Haskel, but there’s still something missing. Eddie was an idiot, and there is no question about Geithner’s intelligence. It’s the evil genius quality that I find hard to crystalize in Geithner.

Report this

By Bertil, February 19, 2009 at 1:13 pm Link to this comment

nodrama,

I think he’s Eddie Haskell, Wally’s friend and smarmy kiss-ass in Leave It to Beaver.  Geithner’s behavior nowadays is one of the natural developments after juvenile smarminess.

Report this

By nodrama, February 18, 2009 at 7:23 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I look at Geithner and I can’t place the face. Is it Lex Luther (no, he was bald)? Is it Gordon Gecko (not really)? Could it be Christopher Wauken (Recession, recession, recession - no depression)? Help me out.

Report this

By Bertil, February 16, 2009 at 8:32 am Link to this comment

Once in a while the MSM media airs a show that hints at something very sinister in its subtext.  Last night 60 Minutes had a piece about the World Savings mortgage fiasco. CNBC, a little later, had on a documentary about the sale of mortages, I can’t remember the name of it.  It amazed me how similar the behavior of the players seemed as it was described in all these stories. It all points to a master plan or a conspiracy.  Something that should be investigated using the RICO statutes for organized crime before another dime is given out to any of these banks under any circumstances.

Report this

By Big B, February 15, 2009 at 6:11 am Link to this comment

wadosy,

I just got a chance to read your post. Very insightful! I have been telling people for years that the war in the middle east and the subsequent worldwide, US caused recession was part of the massive big business plan to take the publics eye off the ball that was peak oil and the immense global consequences it was to bring.

While gas has fallen to two dollars a gallon, and our homes are being forclosed upon, all us short sighted americans seem to have forgotten that the oil is still running out. And that the entire world economy currently runs on a resource that will disappear in the next 40 years. Genius!

Report this

By Bertil, February 14, 2009 at 4:26 pm Link to this comment

Timothy Geithner has a doubles partner.  It is none other than Ben Bernanke, or “Helicopter Ben” as Kevin Phillips points out in “Bad Money.”

When Ben Bernanke was head of the NY Federal Reserve Bank, the same position held by Tiny Tim before he moved to Treasury Secretary, he said that he’d drop money on Wall Street from a helicopter if he had to.

As Dylan Thomas said, “Do not go softly into that good night.” 
It’s the principle of the thing!

Report this

By TAO Walker, February 14, 2009 at 12:39 pm Link to this comment

Tim Geithner’s “message” is the same as all the other wannabe owner/operators’.  The first-class “passengers” and the “officer corps” who serve them have already taken to the “lifeboats.” Everybody else can just “sink-or-swim.”  Thing is, the I-me-and-mine bunch are still too close to their Titanic “global eCONomy” to be sure their hired “security” thugs will be able to fight-off hordes of desperate swimmers who try to reach and board the rafts.  So they keep saying there’s still a chance to “Save Our Ship,” knowing full-well it’s neither true nor any of their intentions to do so, even if it was still possible.

Looks like it’s time for our tame Sisters and Brothers to, in the famous last words of ferryman Sidhartha, slipping from the breaking-up boat and into the rippling River, “Remember yourselves as Fishes.”  “Or,” as his Yin companion urged rising into the Air on wings of pure Love, “as Birds!” 

Why all this angst over the loss of a CONtraption that is only ruining your lives anyhow?  Why so desperate to to keep afloat up Shit
Creek a wastepaper canoe you long since lost the means to paddle and steer?

Our Mother Earth is reclaiming from the tormentors everything they took in their vain attempt to force upon Her an un-dead apparatus intended to degrade all Her Natural Vitality into various kinds of degenerate “energy.”  Those among the domesticated Humans who’ve most IDentified with the invaders, and so have vainly emulated their methods hoping to secure for their own counterfeit “selfs” the same kind of idiotic insulation from the free wild Song ‘n’ Dance of Life Herownself, seem not to’ve figured-out that “impregnable” is just another word for STERILE.

Let the damned thing go….the death-trap “lifeboats,” too.  It’s all going to be sucked-under, anyhow, when Davey Jones claims his due.

HokaHey!

Report this

By Bertil, February 14, 2009 at 11:58 am Link to this comment

The rerun of Geithner’s appearance before the Senate is now on C-SPAN.  The closing remark before the questioning was that they’ll continue until it’s fixed.  In light of what happened to the first $350 billion followed by the revelations that these banks are insolvent already, to the tune of hundreds of trillions of dollars, the words of Moe Howard came to mind, “If at first you don’t succeed, keep on sucking till you do suck seed.”

Report this

By Ribald, February 14, 2009 at 11:57 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Geithner appears to have spent much of his time convincing administration officials that imposing limitations on bailout money and pursuing accountability for financial fraud (the FBI is already overwhelmed with the number of cases). Geithner’s role is to protect the system that he loves. He either doesn’t care about the consequences or believes that he is doing the “right thing.”

  Unfortunately, the very opacity and corruption among banking institutions that led to the current crisis is exactly the system he is trying to protect. His hope, and the hope of many others, is that the economy can be brought back to 2007, when derivatives and the housing bubble were driving economic growth.

  The bankers have learned that secrecy, fraud, and failure are rewarded. The regulators have learned to facilitate that behavior because it makes their job that much easier. When things fail, they get more powers, rather than losing their jobs (Are you against regulation? Shame on you!).

  Unfortunately, the best reforms would destroy the current system. The current system thrives when debt creation outpaces interest on current debt. Debt destruction is its enemy. This is the motivation behind the bank bailout and, to a lesser extent, the stimulus bill. The average consumer is saturated in debt, but the government can be the borrower of last resort and keep the system running.

  This could work, although the sad reality is that it can’t work forever. The government and the citizenry will both be unable to borrow at some point.

Report this

By sns, February 14, 2009 at 11:02 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

these Obama people are going to put the final nails in the economic coffin.

i don’t want to hear one more iota of hope and change or any other rhetoric! i want a plan. plain and simple. a plan with line item designations and specific graphs and projections. i don’t care if half of them prove to be incorrect. i just want the base level minimum effort that serious men and women would put forth before asking for close to 800billion, which, in case you aren’t aware of yet, is JUST THE BEGINNING of what will be requested to bail out what in essence is a STRUCTURAL problem which requires core redesign and not merely throwing good money at bad money.

the shadow banking industry is kaput. the traditional banking system will most likely need to be nationalized. the Obama people start out in comic fashion, despite all of the thoughtful pauses in the thoughtful responses by the figurehead.

Report this

By wadosy, February 14, 2009 at 10:32 am Link to this comment

suppose entity X saw peak oil coming.

suppose entity X decided an appropriate response to peak oil would be to grab the remaining oil at gunpoint.

suppose entity X realized that grabbing oil at gunpoint would be politically impossible, so a pretext would have to be arranged to provide justification for grabbing the oil.

suppose entity X realized that, sooner or later, peak oil would become obvious as a motive for staging their pretext, if business continued as usual.

suppose entity X deliberately lent trillions of dollars to marginal borrowers with the intent of crippling the global economy as peak oil became obvious, thus destroying the possibility of business as usual, thus destroying demand for oil, thus obscuring the fact that global oil production had peaked, thus obscuring peak oil’s function as motive to stage the pretext that provided the justification for the oil acquisition project.

GMAC, ditech, and greenspan…

dots.

Report this

By dihey, February 14, 2009 at 6:33 am Link to this comment

President Obama at the beckoning of his financial Czar Geithner opposes the “freezing” of bonuses to top employees of banks that receive TARP money because it may cause a “brain drain”. What brains?

The notion that the economy will recover because “it always has” is not a prescription for policy but is a form of religion hence is totally unreliable.

No recovery will be meaningful in the long term until a strong and renewed labor movement arises which divorces itself totally from the corrupt Democratic Party and which replaces the equally corrupt union-movement that exists today. It can encompass all people that must work for pay or else starve. It can unite the overwhelming majority of “we the people” in a totally different brand of uniting/solidarity than the horrible Obama miscreant named bipartisanship. It is also the only road to a new political party. Class war? What do you mean class war? If you do not understand that the American brand of class war has brought on the current disaster you, your children, and grandchildren will continue to suffer recession after recession after depression.

Report this

By altara, February 14, 2009 at 4:52 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

related fake news

SUB-ROSA NEWS

Some of the News
That may be True

GEITHNER TO EMBARK ON SPEAKING TOUR

Groundswell of Support Expected

President Obama is sending Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner on a nationwide speaking tour to explain the bank bailout plan carefully crafted by Geithner and his team of experts. While there were some doubters, most who heard his initial speech on the Plan were impressed by the way he brought light and understanding to the immense detail that he had to present.

Just as the President has gone to the country to give the public confidence in his stimulus plan,
Mr. Geithner will be seeking citizen support for his Plan. It has not yet been decided whether to adopt the town hall style used by the President or to make a series of riveting speeches that will
raise the level of enthusiasm for the Plan.

In any event, it is expected that Secretary Geithner’s tour will not only drum up additional grass roots support, but will also serve to entice private investors to join the government in acquiring some of the assets of the banks. As Mr. Geithner himself put it, “It’s not enough to have the unqualified support of Wall Street; we want the American people to understand and have confidence in this comprehensive plan.”

homer   http://www.altara.blogspot.com

Report this

By ocjim, February 13, 2009 at 10:47 pm Link to this comment

I tend to think that Geithner’s vague and unenlightened news conference was more a product of not doing his homework before speaking rather than being intellectually or ideologically challenged like Paulson before him.

I would guess that Geithner’s fault was too much arrogance, an underestimation of public rancor over bankers using us and too much overconfidence.

It’s high time we get an intelligent and prepared executive leadership.

Report this

By Louise, February 13, 2009 at 5:43 pm Link to this comment

et tu Eugene?

My goodness, what is it with you media types? Timothy Geithner’s “debut” this week was his first address as the new Treasury Secretary of the Treasury, speaking to the Department of the Treasury!

As I recall, they were quite impressed!

Maybe the problem is, you, like altogether too many in mainstreammedia thought he was talking to YOU, and explaining his plan for recovery to YOU. He wasn’t. I guess with a few possible exceptions I was the only commoner out here that understood what he was saying, and was actually impressed! But then I didn’t make a point of watching so I could see how he was going to save me. I made a point of watching to see how the guys mind works!

Geithner did not roll out the Obama administration’s financial rescue plan! I’m beginning to wonder if any of you will be able to comprehend it when he does! I’m beginning to think you probably wont, since you seem to think he already has!

Maybe you’ve all been spoiled by so many years of Bush/Republican leadership, where they delivered neat little sound bites with a few words you understood, that rarely made sense, but made it possible for a simple mind to fill in the blanks and come with anything necessary to satisfy the instant news thing.

Yeh, that must be it. Geithner was far to intelligent, far to thurough and far to unruffled by media histeria. The nerve of the man. He should know by now mainstreammedia calls the shots, right? I mean how can we possibly expect the instant news consumers to understand dry, witless and lengthy facts?

You “don’t know how he could get much worse”?

What’s the problem Eugene, you were you expecting a rock star maybe? Or are you just a little bent out of shape because all the HYPE you media folks created announcing Geithner was going to unveil Obamas financial rescue plan was just that. So much media hype! No plan.

Darn, you didn’t get your scoop of poop, so you had to create some! And judging the public reaction from the media addicted, they’re just as happy with the poop as the scoop.

Man what an easy job!

Report this

By GoldenT, February 13, 2009 at 5:10 pm Link to this comment

Are you kidding me? I don’t see how Geithner could have been any more clear in telling Congress, “Do your job!”

Everything he said was perceived by those who understand the gravity of this crisis as indicating Treasury fully understands no magic wand, no bad bank, can turn this around. It’s bankrupt. Without saying so, the Treasury Secretary said nothing else.

Where did you get Treasury saying, “Trust us, we’ve got this?” If they did, don’t you think they’d have the details of a plan? No plan = there’s no solution short of bankruptcy.

Geithner does not have nearly as tough a job as Congress. First step, get rid of that worthless Speaker, Pelosi. She’s clueless and she is unfit for the job.

Report this

By lowelz, February 13, 2009 at 3:41 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Are you kidding? Geithner is just at the beginning of his downward spiral. This guy is a scumbag, do some research on him. He’s in it to win it for the few, not for the many. His tie would probably cost a weeks pay for me. I mean just look at the guy, he practically has SCUMBAG written on his forehead!

Report this

By bg1, February 13, 2009 at 12:10 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

What happens when Summers and Geithner lose credibility with the financial markets?  Has it already happened?

Report this

By dihey, February 13, 2009 at 11:04 am Link to this comment

I will save this piece to find out how good of a “predictor” Mr. Robinson is. I suspect that he will be marooned on an island like his namesake.

Meanwhile on the “stimulus front”. The poor, deluded Obama-swooners do not realize that the safest “stimulus package” is still to come and on that one most democrats AND republicans will vote aye in a bipartisan love-fest. I am talking about the defense budget (Obama will make absolutely sure that it is huge and is not called “stimulus package”!). In the land of “stimulus” it does not matter what the money is spent on. The best “stimulus” is appropriating funds which are spent almost immediately and without much protest from politicians or the American public. By implication the defense budget and its pernicious “supplementals” fit the demands to a tee. Even Senator Obama kept saying that “we must support our troops in Iraq and elsewhere”. Hence the acme of “stimulus packages” is to keep as many soldiers as possible at war and far away from our shores such that their support remains happily expensive. “Stimulators Unite” and fight for the passage of the next defense appropriations bill at the tune of at least one trillion dollars!

I am noticing blogs which demand that President Obama write all bills and force the Democrats in Congress to accept his versions or threaten with a veto. Wow! These are the same people who castigated President Bush for doing exactly that. Folks, the legislative is in Congress and not in the White House and let’s keep it that way. There is no clause in our Constitution that “the President must get it his way”. We have enough “Czars” and do not need another one.

Report this

By wildflower, February 13, 2009 at 10:32 am Link to this comment

Re godistwaddle’s Post: “How to get banking reform.”

A pretty good plan, godistwaddle, but I do see a couple of hurdles. A lot of Americans don’t believe in the death penalty.  Perhaps, we should develop a more centralist plan like giving these bankers life sentences on sort of an “O Bankers Where Art Thou” chain gang? 

And if real reform and justice is to occur, we can’t forget the role that “deregulation and financial liberalization” played in this crisis, which means all those Washington politicians who set up in the frame work for this crisis should go to work on the chain gain as well.

Report this
Eric L. Prentis's avatar

By Eric L. Prentis, February 13, 2009 at 10:18 am Link to this comment

Financial masters of the universe (FMU), i.e., Wall Street bankers, private equity and hedge funds had a once in a century party and invited Washington politicians and the real-estate industry to their festivities. The party’s bill is $3.6 trillion dollars, and rapidly climbing, of which the FMU paid themselves many hundreds of billions of dollars in ill-gotten gains. The FMU convinced their Washington political stooges to see if they could get the people, who weren’t even invited to the party, to pay for the debauchery, the Congressional lackeys readily agreed. If Washington D.C. wasn’t such a stinking cesspool of corruption, these Wall Street crooks would be in jail now along with the Enron crook Jeffrey Skilling.

The US is way over-banked with approximately 8,000 institutions, we would not miss 25 percent of them during this downturn, consequently, let failed banks go bankrupt. The Fed/Bernanke is trying to save all the politically connected bank directors/managers/stock and bond holders and equating that with saving the financial system, which it isn’t. Also, the Fed/Congress is not investigating what went wrong during this financial crisis and how to fix it, e.g., what do we do with credit default swaps (CDS), (answer: naked CDS should be illegal because they are “bucket shop” contracts), lax regulations (they should be beefed up but which ones and how should they be better enforced) and phony accounting rules (how was Lehman Brothers ever a sound business with a $100 billion dollar hole in their balance sheet).  Doing more of the same and expecting a different outcome is the height of irresponsibility, but obviously the slimy-on-the-take politicians, i.e., Geithner/Summers/Bernanke/Schumer/Dodd/Frank, subscribe to the Bernie Madoff swindling school of investing and believe the American people can be conned, yet again. President Obama, where are you.

Report this

By grumpynykr, February 13, 2009 at 10:00 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Can’t some form of Glass-Streagle law be ressurected and force the breakup of these financial monoliths before they become “too big to fail”?  also fire members of the Goldman Sachs mafia from Geithner to Corzine to Reich to Summers.  These bastards caused the meltdown; how in the heck are they supposed to FIX it?!

I’m tired of these dog and pony chastising before Congress.  These legislators had ample opportunities to put in rules to fire executives, slash pay/compensation, create a larger shares taxpayer ownership of preferred stock/bonds of banks/investment houses, BEFORE voting on it.  Also list members of Congress who accept bribes from the financial industry, and which committees they roost in.

Tax the hedge funds, banks and use that money to held distressed homewowners, consumers in credit card debt.  Close loopholes that allow the funneling of money out of the US.

Report this

By P. T., February 13, 2009 at 9:55 am Link to this comment

The problem is not bad public relations by Timothy Geithner.  The problem is Geithner’s “plan” makes no sense unless he is just trying to save the bankers’ jobs and their stockholders.  It is pouring more money down a rat hole.

The bad banks need to be audited and declared insolvent.  The government needs to replace the management, write down the bad loans, then sell the banks off.  The obvious solution is what was done years ago in the savings and loan meltdown.

Geithner is trying to protect the rich and is costing taxpayers a bundle.

Report this
godistwaddle's avatar

By godistwaddle, February 13, 2009 at 9:36 am Link to this comment

How to get banking reform:  1. Obtain rope. 2. Obtain banker. 3. Hang banker. 4. Post video on Youtube. 5. Observe and monitor banking reform. 6. Repeat as necessary.

Report this

By coloradokarl, February 13, 2009 at 9:22 am Link to this comment

If 50 Million people put up $1.00 each we could hire the top 10 legal minds and their respective crews to pursue a class action suit against the whole lot of the financial miscreants. It would take years we might not get any Money but it would surely leave them with less wealth and thats what they live for. Hell I would put up $20.00 for the tickets to that show.

Report this

By wildflower, February 13, 2009 at 8:22 am Link to this comment

Great idea, Eugene. As it just so happens, I have a few “living room” questions that I would love to ask our Washington “leadership” . . . and I would expect the answers to have a little substance:

1st Question - If U.S. soldiers can be called to serve and asked to put their lives on the line for the sake of our country, why can’t Wall Street be called to serve and be asked to place their “loophole-free compensation limits” aside for the sake of our country? 

2nd Question - If the leadership in capitalistic countries like Japan, Germany, Switzerland, United Kingdom and Taiwan can provide affordable and bankruptcy free healthcare systems for their citizens, why can’t the leadership in the U.S. do the same for our citizens?

3rd Question - Why is the employment rate growing faster in Europe than in the U.S., especially since Europe has a lower rate of population growth? Is it because the leadership in Europe is more effective than the leadership in the U.S.?

Report this

By J. Gathright, February 13, 2009 at 8:18 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

After dramatic shuttle failures, NASA conducted an independent review to ascertain what went wrong, so that they would know what to fix.  Why has there been no such official review of the economic infrastructure underlying the present disaster?  How can we, the taxpayers, know what to support if we are not presented with a cogent, publicly acknowledged, analysis of the problem?  Find the economic equivalent of Richard Feynman and a few other reasonable souls to take a look at what went wrong.  I would put a child or two on the panel as well; someone who may be able to comment honestly on the emperor’s raiment.

The “unrequited, Old Testament wrath” that Mr. Robinson identifies is a consequence of this lack of a generally-accepted foundation on which to base all these “fixes” and “stimuli”.  First, build a concensus among those who will be asked—forced, in fact—to pay for the mitigations to be undertaken.  Only then can the confused and unfocused, but potentially dangerous, outrage of the public be redirected such that we can co-operate, pull together as a nation to face the hardships that are about to be visited upon us… and likely upon our children.

How can you expect us to support what appear to be measures suggested by the incompetent that benefit the affluent and shield the guilty?  Yes, of course, “there’s plenty of blame to go around” and “we all bear some responsibility”; but these stock phrases are only trotted out to justify a complete lack of official investigation and disclosure.  If there is so much responsibility and blame then it should not be that difficult to elucidate and explain it.

Report this
Purple Girl's avatar

By Purple Girl, February 13, 2009 at 6:09 am Link to this comment

Americans are Sick of Watching WallStreets Temper Tantrums on the Boo Woo-O- Meter. Close down WallStreet for at least a day when the Adults must discuss how to clean up their split milk and shitty diapers!
Wall street Continues to prove they have no impulse control, or any Sense of the disasterous reality they have inflicted on US.What would it hurt to give them a ‘time Out’, to stop their ‘Sell, Sell,Sell’ stupity. Might help US who’s pension and annuities are being held hostage.
As for Geithners speech, I don’t think it was inteded to appease the Wall Streeter, but a way to talk to US who have suffered under their reign of terror and who are now asked to foot the bill.
I wanted not only an apology, but also a guarantee that the Admin understands that We are Pissed and very likely going to scream if one more red cent is handed to Wall Street without Serious restraints being imposed. I don’t need the gorey details. No Doubt Geithner was also bracing US for the reality this hole is bigger than the 700 Billion Christmas gift the Repugs handed over within a week of that 2 1/2 pageDeath threat Ransom note Paulson Scribbled out 6 months prior in crayon.Funny the Repugs couldn’t kick down any funds for US when the biggest Shopping Season was right around the corner. Funny they couldn’t put together a stim package for US in their ramaining 4 months of absolute power. Funny they couldn’t create 6 Million jobs in 8 years with their Tax cuts.Funny they had no concept of ‘fiscal conservativism’ when they granted Liberties to the financial industry. Funny the ignored ‘Fiscal Responsiblity’ When they were Pilfering our Money at 10 Billion a month for an ill fated illegal invasion and occupation.Funny how Exxon could earn the Highest Profits in history when the costs to US in fuel prices were as historical.Funny how Repugs still cry for more Tax cuts for Corps. 
Do I trust Geithner? not particularly. But who really trusted Sammy the Bull when he brought down the Teflon Don? But he Delivered Gotti on a silver platter, didn’t he?
“Public Executions” ..Make sure the guy who tied Saddams Noose is available and a Defibulator so we can kick start All the ‘Dick’s, and hang ‘em again!

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






                        Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?

Are you a human? Retype the word you see here.

     

Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.