|
|
May 18, 2013
|
|
Maybe the Only Crime Was by Blago’s BarberPosted on Jan 27, 2009Is Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich about to be impeached on grounds of loopiness, obnoxiousness and a bad haircut? Apparently so. In defense of the Illinois state senators who seem to have already decided the governor’s fate, however, the haircut really does border on the criminal. But it is unclear to me what else Blagojevich has done that a duly constituted jury would find illegal. Even in the matter of his menacing mop, at worst he’s a co-conspirator in a dastardly act committed by his barber. Unfortunately for the governor, the Illinois Senate is not bound by the strict rules of evidence and testimony that constrain a criminal court. And even an observer as biased as I am—what columnist wants to see such a colorful and unpredictable figure banished from the political scene?—must acknowledge that residents of the fifth most populous state in the union deserve better than to be governed by a late-night punch line. On Monday, while lawmakers in Springfield were convening the governor’s impeachment trial, Blagojevich was in New York making the talk-show rounds. He was acting more like a movie star whose latest film comes out Friday than a politician who might be out of a job by Friday. Blagojevich is accused by U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald of trying to sell President Obama’s vacated Senate seat to the highest bidder. The governor, who maintains he is innocent, told ABC’s “Good Morning America”—and this is an example of why we’ll miss him—that among those he considered for appointment to the United States Senate was Oprah Winfrey. Advertisement What would give him that idea? Blagojevich also pleaded his case on NBC’s “Today,” in an interview taped at his campaign offices—where prosecutor Fitzgerald’s wiretaps picked up the conversations that led to the governor’s arrest. It was an exercise in futility, as far as the impeachment proceedings are concerned. Fitzgerald has asked the Illinois Legislature to stay away from witnesses who might be called in an eventual criminal trial. That means the senators sitting in judgment of Blagojevich are unlikely to hear direct testimony of his guilt or innocence. The FBI affidavit detailing wiretapped conversations about the Senate seat and other matters should suffice to get the governor booted from office. Those expletive-laden conference calls and bull sessions might not be enough, however, to put him in jail. Fitzgerald may have evidence he has not yet presented. From what we’ve seen, though, it’s not immediately apparent what crime Blagojevich has committed except being something of a buffoon and a jerk. In one taped conversation, Blagojevich refers to the empty Senate seat as “a (expletive) valuable thing. You just don’t give it away for nothing. ... I’ve got this thing, and it’s (expletive) golden.” He evaluates various candidates according to what they might deliver in return—campaign contributions, for example—and excoriates Obama’s staff for refusing to offer anything on behalf of their favorite candidate, longtime supporter Valerie Jarrett, except appreciation. In some circles, this is known as politics. Cover the children’s ears. Trying to leverage a political appointment into a political advantage is not unprecedented. Doing so while talking like a character from “The Sopranos” is an aesthetic offense, but I’m not sure it’s a criminal one. Had Blagojevich consummated a deal for personal gain in exchange for the appointment, Fitzgerald may have had an open-and-shut case. But the governor didn’t consummate anything. He just talked and talked and talked, mostly about how nobody wanted to play ball with him. I question whether anything on the tapes is enough to put him in jail. His talents would be wasted there, anyway. Watching him on “The View,” you could see that the man was born to be a talk-show host. When Joy Behar said she heard he did a spot-on Richard Nixon impression and invited him to say “I am not a crook,” he wisely demurred. Then, without missing a beat, he countered: “Let me make this perfectly clear. ...” © 2009, Washington Post Writers Group New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By dihey, January 29, 2009 at 2:38 pm Link to this comment
The media will miss this highly entertaining man to offset the boring daily dose of Mr. Obama.
Report thisBy WSmart, January 29, 2009 at 11:15 am Link to this comment
I agree. None of this says anything even about his character, let alone a crime.
Too much drinking and not enough thinking. Politics are a function of the people. Where you have corruption at home, you have corruption in government. Where the people have little character, so do their leaders. Men stopped being men when they started drinking alcohol; “If you can’t beat em’, join em’.”. It’s that moral collapse that ails our Western Culture today. Alcohol is the drug of denial. And in the state of denial, the only true crime is being human, a ‘mistake’ worse then sin.
Be real, be sober.
Report thisBy Frank Newman, January 28, 2009 at 1:18 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
I listen to Gene a lot but on this one, I think he’s wrong. The basic rule for all people who are in the middle of doing something illegal: don’t take pictures (Abu Ghraib)or talk too much on the phone
Report this(Blago). If you are really smart, you make all the e-mails disappear (Cheney) or make the financial paperwork so complicated that no one can figure it out (Wall Street Bankers). For all you folks who think it’s business as usual, Chris Mathews on Hardball made a very good point; if you go back and check the incoming money trail you’ll almost always find a campaign contribution coming back to every member of Congress who passed an earmark (money to someone). If you really want to get cynical, you could point out how much money was thrown at the Obama inauguration by the Wall Street bankers.
By Leefeller, January 27, 2009 at 6:39 pm Link to this comment
Hemi,
All this time I thought he was in Ohio, well it seems there are more screwed up states than one could shake a stick at. It would take an Octopus with hands and feet to count on it’s fingers and toes how many states are really screwed up.
Has anyone read that Iceland has crashed like a Hamas rocket. As for politicians who care about anyone but themselves they are few and far between.
Values are different for people like Blago, how about non existent.
Report thisBy chupachoup, January 27, 2009 at 6:01 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
i know i’m cynical, and that that can get in the way of something like, hope. this guy is a charming thug until it’s you (in this case a state), that he’s feeding to the hogs, and then selling the pork chops.
Report thisi can’t believe how many people find him “interesting”. he’s working on his folk hero status, or rather he is getting the “media” to work on it for him.
the guy doesn’t care about anyone but himself or he would have stepped aside for the investigation to be systematic and complete. instead he is out there tampering with the jury before there is one.
By Hemi*, January 27, 2009 at 3:57 pm Link to this comment
Leefeller, I think it’s hard for this guy to give up the fight. This chutzpah that’s on display now got him to the governor’s office. I was going to say mansion but the home he’s been shown leaving on the news is just a house and that’s heartening. Bright or dim-witted these politicians are different animals. And this animal’s fighting for its’ life.
Why is this guy able to keep up this positive veneer? I heard this morning that he’s been offered a package in order to get him to step down. Why doesn’t he take it? My conclusions at his stage are that there’s much more to this story. He wants the entire contents of the tapes to be divulged. Why? Is it possible that there are bigger fish in this frying pan? Is that why the Illinois state senate has been slow to act? Is it possible that he vented the tough talk to no one in particular? He impresses me as a man holding a “get out of jail free” card.
It’s too bad for Illinois but I don’t see them marching with torches and pitchforks in Chicago. For the rest of us it’s a side-show. I don’t think this is taking anything away from the critical issues in the news. I can’t remember a time when we’ve been more saturated with critical issues. The critical issues are a circus so why
Report thisnot a side-show too?
By Bilejones, January 27, 2009 at 2:48 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Blagojevich’s crime is to make explicit the fact that politics itself in inherently corrupt. To show
Report this“that the State is nothing more nor less than a bandit gang writ large” as Murray Rothbard wrote. That’s why the corporate media whores are having such a hard time with this one, it’s the cognitive dissonance of having to condemn in this instance what they exist to defend in all others.
By Leefeller, January 27, 2009 at 1:55 pm Link to this comment
Bush an ex governor of Texas showed us his way of enlightenment, and since the election we have seen plenty of Palin in the ass. This Balgo’s barber, probably hates his guts, an idiot like Balgo should be promoted to imbecile for his comments spewed on TV, it is a sadness to behold so much ignorance from are supposed representatives.
Perceived ignorance of these so called leaders, reflects on their states as a whole and this is why nothing changes for the better.
Report thisBy Ivan Hentschel, January 27, 2009 at 11:00 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Blago is proving himself to be a publicity hound and a boor, but he is perhaps the perfect symbol of American politics. However, from all that I know and have read, this impeachment is a political exercise and not a judicial one. The same rules and procedures do not apply. Juries and judges have nothing to do with this. Let him just join the ranks of other disgraced IL governors and let’s move on. He has established his uselessness, so stop wasting time, energy and print space. Robinson, I thought you knew better!
Report thisBy abdo, January 27, 2009 at 10:48 am Link to this comment
I do not know if swearing and talking about selling a senate seat is much worse than falsifying intelligence , manipulating the low the media and the public. The corrupt governor is not any way close to crazy goerg who destroyed two countries. Million died, maimed and became homeless because of georg, shouldn’t he be tried too?
Report thisBy Little Brother, January 27, 2009 at 10:32 am Link to this comment
Not only do I heartily agree with Mark Twain’s characterization of Congress as “America’s native criminal class”—I would extend the membership to every political officeholder from mayor on up.
So I generally believe that if one scratches a politician, one will find a self-serving, self-important venal crook.
Still, the Blagojevich Caper was too pat from the get-go. It was presented as if it were the equivalent of those long ago ABSCAM sting videotapes catching politicians with their crumby paws in the cookie jar—or the report of Rep. Jefferson’s 90 grand in the freezer.
And the crowd went wild when the Illinois legislature fast-tracked the impeachment, as if the lege were making up for all the criminal malfeasance of the Big Congress’ failure to impeach when the impeachin’ was good.
I would love to believe in a legislature so devoted to principle and ethics that they zealously safeguard the rights of We the People without fear or favor. However, I perceived the Illinois legislature as more closely resembling a pack of hungry hyenas descending on a gutpile—more a result of the smell of blood than an orgy of responsibility.
I wasn’t familiar with Blago before this scandal, but I can see that he’s just goofy enough to come off like one of Amerika’s Dumbest Criminals.
He may be as bad, or worse, as his critics claim. But it would have been far more prudent for the Illinois legislature to let the grown-up prosecutor do his job first, instead of jumping on an impeachment bandwagon that can only interfere with the real prosecution.
The Puddinhead Posse seems just a trifle too eager to get in ahead of the sheriff.
Report thisBy Gaia, January 27, 2009 at 3:23 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Yes, he does seem guilty of being a “tool”, but we would have to get rid of most of our elected officials if that were the litmus test.
Too bad we couldn’t have moved on W’s rear so fast with the Big “I” word.
Guilty or not, the real injustice here is that all the Bushies are still roaming free with with so far no questions asked.
Report thisBy diamond, January 27, 2009 at 2:58 am Link to this comment
At last a voice of reason amongst all the hysterical bullshit.
Report this