Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
Top Banner, Site wide
Apr 19, 2014

 Choose a size
Text Size

Top Leaderboard, Site wide





The Divide


Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Report

Obama Will Back Israel

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Jan 8, 2009
Obama
AP photo / Rina Castelnuovo, pool

Campaign flashback: Barack Obama is presented with an “I Love Sderot” T-shirt by Sderot Mayor Eli Moyal as they stand in front of a display of rockets that landed in southern Israel.

By Bill Boyarsky

The goal of Hamas and its soul mates, Hezbollah and Iran, is the destruction of the state of Israel and its Jewish citizens.

Israel is defending itself in the Gaza war, even though pictures of dead and wounded Gaza residents on television, on the Internet and in the newspapers give the impression of Israeli aggression. Hamas has cynically helped create that impression by launching its rocket attacks from among civilians.

President-elect Barack Obama seems to understand this. That is why, once he takes office, he should move to stop Hamas from firing rockets into Israel and smuggling arms through its network of tunnels.

From what he has said, that’s what he’ll do. Obama and other sensible people will seek a two-state solution with Palestinians and Jews living in something that at least approaches peace.

Granted, his recent predecessors failed. Only Jimmy Carter, negotiating the Camp David accords between Israel and Egypt, succeeded. But I’m betting on the new guy, a man who has already achieved something previously thought impossible.

Advertisement

Square, Site wide
The present violence began while America was celebrating a new chapter in its history, the election of the first African-American president.  As this country looked forward, events conspired to drag Obama backward, into the decades-old struggle that started when Jews returned to their biblical homeland, first in a trickle and then en masse after World War II.

On Tuesday, Nov. 4, Election Day, Israeli forces entered Gaza to destroy a tunnel they suspected was to be used for abducting soldiers. Hamas used such a tunnel in June 2006 to kidnap Gilad Shalit, an Israeli soldier who is still being held. The Israelis killed one Hamas gunman and wounded at least three others. Hamas fired back with rockets, Reuters reported at the time. Israeli airstrikes killed five more men, identified by Reuters and the Associated Press as militants, and Hamas blasted Israel with dozens of rockets. The barrage had been preceded by years of Hamas firing its rockets into Israeli communities. A truce in effect since June was shattered, and on Dec. 19, Hamas ended the cease-fire.

The outlines of another temporary truce may be emerging.

Israel agreed to halt fighting for three hours a day to allow food, medical supplies and other aid into the battered territory. This came after an Israeli attack on a U.N. school building used as a shelter killed 40 people, according to the United Nations. Israelis said Hamas was firing from the school, but Bloomberg reported that the U.N. Relief and Works Agency said it was “99.9” percent certain there were no militants in the school. Bloomberg quoted Mu’awia Hassanein, chief of emergency medical services in Gaza, as saying at least 630 Palestinians have died in the onslaught and 2,600 have been wounded. U.N. officials said as many as a quarter of the Palestinians killed were civilians, a figure Israel disputes as too high.

Possible terms of a cease-fire were outlined by former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, who represents the entities known as the Mideast Quartet —the United Nations, United States, Russia and the European Union.

Blair said that any cease-fire in the Gaza conflict will require “clear and definitive action” to halt the smuggling of weapons and money into the Hamas-ruled Palestinian territory.

“If there is strong action on that front, so that Israel feels it has achieved something—namely the end of the smuggling of weapons and finance to Hamas—then I think it is possible to resolve this reasonably quickly,” Blair told CNN. “If that doesn’t happen, if we’re not in that position, then obviously it’s going to go on.”

Obama has said little, a position that has drawn criticism from the Jewish right wing and the American left. When the Israelis blasted the Gaza school site, all Obama said was that “the loss of civilian life in Gaza and Israel is a source of deep concern for me.” But he reiterated that only President George W. Bush would speak for U.S. foreign policy until the inauguration.

That sounds like a political copout. Obama is overwhelmed with a recession teetering into a depression and with assembling a national security team that he can trust not to continue Bush administration policies. He’ll be pounded from the left and the right no matter what he does on Gaza, because he will almost certainly choose the middle of the road. But the very fact that he had to comment after the school bombing shows how difficult it will be for him to remain silent until inauguration day.

Based on everything he said during the campaign, Obama appears determined to stand up for Israel.

A memorable example of this occurred last July 23 when he visited Sderot, a frequent Hamas rocket target, during his trip to the Middle East and Europe. The moment is preserved on YouTube and should be viewed by anyone who doubts where Obama is headed on this issue.

Standing in front of a pile of spent rocket casings, he said: “I’m here to say as an American and as a friend of Israel that we stand with the people of Sderot and with all of the people of Israel.

“The Qassam rockets fired by Hamas deliberately and indiscriminately target civilians, and this terror is intolerable. Israelis should not have to live in danger in their homes and schools. ... Israel must always stand up for its right to defend itself against those who threaten its people. To achieve true security I am deeply committed to helping Israel achieve a lasting peace with Palestinians who accept the state of Israel, renounce violence and terrorism and abide by agreements.”

He said he favored “a strong, secure state of Israel living besides a viable and peaceful Palestinian state.” He also condemned an “Iranian regime that sponsors terrorism, pursues nuclear weapons and threatens Israel’s existence. A nuclear Iran would pose a grave threat, and the world must prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.”

“I bring to Sderot an unshakable commitment to Israel’s security. The state of Israel faces determined enemies who seek its destruction. But it also has a friend and ally in the United States that will also stand by Israel.”

Standing by Israel means standing up for its continued existence as a Jewish state. Hamas and its allies want every Jew in Israel dead or gone. That’s what the Gaza war is about, and that’s what Obama has promised won’t happen.


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By dick, January 8, 2009 at 3:52 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Truman caved-in, and ever since it has been disaster for the USA, with no end in sight.Israel will probably be the main cause and trigger of world war three.

Report this

By Nick Sullivan, January 8, 2009 at 3:51 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Israel was not responding to a rocket attack from Hamas. Hamas was responding to an Israeli attack on them which broke the agreed-to ceasefire that had been in place for some 6 months. The much referred to tunnel used to smuggle weaponry was primarily a food and medical supplies route. Never mind the fact that what is left of Palestine is essentially a prison where populace lives under atrocious conditions imposed on them by the surrounding oppressor. We should all be shocked there are tunnels leading out of Gaza! Common sense may tell us that a tunnel would be if not the best option of cicrumventing an 80ft tall concrete wall, should one all of a sudden - and counter to international law - spring up in your back yard.
General ignorance of the U.S. public, which you clearly exemplify, is the main cause of human suffering in that region and you should be ashamed for propagating the lies which keep the policy of Apartheid in tact. I dare you to apply the same standards accross the board and come to the same conclusions.

Report this

By troublesum, January 8, 2009 at 3:50 pm Link to this comment

Boyarsky repeats the lie that Hamas stands for the destruction of Israel.  Hamas is on record as being in favor of a two state solution to the conflict once Israel returns to the 1967 boarders.  Why is it that Israel’s supporters in the west cannot wrap their minds around the idea of returning to the 1967 boarders?  Peace depends on it, but they are blind to it.

Report this

By James Hovland, January 8, 2009 at 3:16 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

This all started when nomads from Mesopotamia, after suffering hardship in Egypt, unleashed their rage in a complete genocide against the people of Canaan. They proclaimed themselves to be the “chosen people”, and later wrote books to support their claims and justify their genocide as divine wisdom.

After being scattered to the wind, and having once again suffered hardship, this time in Germany, they have returned. For 60 years now the siege has continued, and they have yet to blow their horn and prove their divinity.

In biblical times, the “sons of Israel” wiped Canaan off the map and slaughtered all of it’s inhabitants. In 1948 it started all over again when the “sons of Israel” wiped Palestine off the map, and the slaughter continues. When this genocide is complete, will they write us some more books to excuse their actions and reaffirm their place in the world as god’s “chosen people”, as they did last time?

How can people worship a god that commands genocide, condones slavery, and favors one race above all others? I can understand if you are the ones being promised the world, religion holds great power over those, but the rest of us should be smart enough to tell the difference between right and wrong.

Can you make the distinction between facts and beliefs? The failure of the Iraq pre-war “intelligence” proved that many can’t. The distinction was never made and the War was waged on the belief that there was WMD while the evidence that there wasn’t was avoided. This was later described as poor intelligence. I agree.

Report this

By Thomas Mc, January 8, 2009 at 3:06 pm Link to this comment

The reason it took America so long to get involved in the European side of WWII, was because so many Americans supported Germany’s declaration that it was only protecting itself from Jewish terrorism. Today the same thing is happening, but eventually US support for Israel will come to an end, and so will Israel.

Report this

By Steve, January 8, 2009 at 2:59 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

I agree with the other posters, since when do we have a chief of staff who holds dual citizenship with Israel and not be conflict of interest for the United States.  We place the needs of the state of Israel over the needs of our country.  Unfortunately, before Obama even takes office the spirit of goodwill the world community had for Obama will be reduced to more hatred of the hegegomy of the US.  His foreign policy will be a disaster if he chooses to back Israel unequivocally.

Report this

By anon, January 8, 2009 at 2:55 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Maybe I ate too much sugary cereal today…  But isn’t Truthdig supposed to be a “liberal” blog??

Report this

By jackpine savage, January 8, 2009 at 2:42 pm Link to this comment

He said he favored “a strong, secure state of Israel living besides a viable and peaceful Palestinian state.”

Read it again…one more time, thinking carefully about the choice of words and their relation to each other.

“Strong, secure”/“viable, peaceful”. 

One wonders if the Palestinians will get their very own drinking fountains?

Report this
skulz fontaine's avatar

By skulz fontaine, January 8, 2009 at 2:31 pm Link to this comment

Could we call the Obama position on Gaza, ‘obamanation’? Given the Obama choice for chief of staff, Israel first will always be first. So suffice it to say, Barrack is in collusion with the gang rape of Gaza. Now that’s “change” we can hold accountable.

Report this

Page 2 of 2 pages  <  1 2

Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
 
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion   Publisher, Zuade Kaufman   Editor, Robert Scheer
© 2014 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.

Like Truthdig on Facebook