LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.   Exclusive Truthdig Merchandise - Gore Vidal signed first editions - Signed Mr. Fish prints
November 22, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Intelligentsia Against Intelligence

Throw the Money Changers Out of the Temple

Obama's Job Approval Slips Below 50 Percent

Claire Wasserman on Europe's Islamic Immigrants

Battlefield in the War of Ideas

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Enough G-2 Talk Already
Despite Subsidies, Class Sizes Rise in California Schools

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Freedom’s Fight: Part II

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
Field Days

Field Days

By Jonah Raskin
$16.47

more items

 
Reports

Yukking It Up at the Blago Show

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Jan 6, 2009

By Marie Cocco

    I am supposed to be typing out words that articulate a highly audible and terribly alarmed tsk tsk. Instead, I am laughing with unrestrained amusement at the farce that Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich has engineered for what looks to be the flamboyant coda to his undistinguished career.

    Honestly, I haven’t had this much fun since New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer’s implosion and resignation from office in a scandal involving his patronage of high-end prostitutes.

    Democrats dutifully wring their hands over the political fix the ethically challenged Blagojevich has created in naming Roland Burris to the U.S. Senate seat vacated by President-elect Barack Obama. Why, the Illinois governor—target of a federal investigation into his alleged effort to sell the Senate vacancy to the highest bidder—outwitted some of Washington’s canniest political foxes in using his perfectly legal authority to appoint not just a politician who seems legitimately entitled to take the seat, but an African-American as well. 

    A cacophony of issues and events more rightfully demands our attention and concern—the resumption of war between Israel and the Palestinians, the worst economic crisis in decades, the upcoming inauguration of the nation’s first black president. Still, I’ll own up to an unseemly sentiment: Blagojevich and the chaos he has cunningly provoked are blessings from the media gods.

    There is nothing quite like the spectacle of scandal to remind journalists why we got into this business to start with. Yes, most reporters are inspired by the urge to serve the public, to expose governmental wrongs, and through good work—and no small dose of good luck—to help right them.

Advertisement

    But there is also the matter of wanting to have more fun at work than, say, your average tax attorney. For this, the amusement provided by incandescent political egos is an enduring perk of the job.

    The Blagojevich imbroglio already has provided us with an FBI affidavit in the case that reads like a script for “The Sopranos.” The taped conversations Blagojevich had about getting people to cough up the goods—money, a job for him or his wife or any other plausible emolument—are likely to become the hot soundtrack of any eventual trial. Not since Rep. Richard Kelly of Florida was caught on an FBI videotape stuffing $25,000 in cash into his pockets during the long-ago Abscam probe has evidence been so entertaining.

    Now, it turns out, there also is a possibility that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid—who says, at least for the moment, that he won’t seat Burris because of the taint surrounding the appointment—may himself have been recorded. The Chicago Sun-Times has reported that Reid told Blagojevich in a phone conversation that he worried about whether several potential African-American appointees would be able to mount successful statewide campaigns to retain the seat for Democrats.

    This one has it all: The corruption in Illinois that is so blatant it strains credulity. The incendiary racial politics played openly, if clumsily, by Blagojevich, Burris and assorted hangers-on who seek to embarrass Obama or Democrats generally. The exquisite hypocrisy of Senate Democrats suddenly finding their moral voices in a controversy that amounts to a spat over who can gain membership in their coveted club.

    These are the same Senate Democrats who, as a group, went along with the most amoral endeavors the Bush administration could cook up—everything from the Iraq invasion to spying on Americans without warrants to showering the wealthy with expensive tax breaks. So now they’re worried about a taint on the Senate caused by penny-ante politics?

    Republicans find themselves in the auspicious position of getting to argue for the good-government solution: filling the Illinois seat through a special election. Of course this election would, in theory, give the GOP a fighting chance of winning the seat that it has not the slightest hope of gaining through an appointment by Blagojevich, or any Democratic governor who might succeed him. Those searching for purity of motive need not look here.

    The righteous howl with disapproval at the entire episode and hope that, for the sake of the country, someone finds a reasonable and quick solution to the improbable standoff. Not me. The country—indeed the Senate—has survived worse shenanigans and somehow the republic has survived.

    This convoluted drama may be unfolding in what seems like a theater of the absurd. But it is riotously good fun nonetheless.

    Marie Cocco’s e-mail address is mariecocco(at)washpost.com.

    © 2009, Washington Post Writers Group


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Jonnan, January 8 at 10:39 pm #

Can someone tell me exactly how Harry Reid still has a job?

Seriously - The man seem to be constitutionally incapable of getting a win, to an extent even Nancy Pelosi can’t match. He supports people acting against the best interests of the country and the party, and discounts those that support.

It’s not so much that the Senator from Nevada would draw on an inside straight, but that he would discard two ace’s doing so.

Report this

By RBShea, January 8 at 7:40 pm #

Enjoyed the article but beneath the laughter lurks another less-humorous thread;Harry Reid once again demonstrates that he’s an idiot which does not bode well for leading the Dem Senate to pass an Obama agenda.
That’s of course assuming there is an Obama agenda that isn’t so watered down with “bipartisanship” that the last laugh will be with the Repugnicans.

Report this

By joey, January 8 at 7:07 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Elliot Spitzer, just his name still brings a smile.
In his day he challenged Hank Greenberg, Sandy Wild and Frank Langone . He clawed back money from many Wall Street giants. He might have been the last regulator that could have derailed the housing bubble and stopped the securities fraud. It wouldn’t take much to imagine that Eliott was a assisted suicide.

Report this

By dihey, January 7 at 9:37 pm #

Once again Senators Reid and Durban have demanded that Mr. Burris provide the signature of the Secretary of State of Illinois. The SSI will probably sign but once again these two paragons of virtue Reid and Durban trample on our Constitution to save their ugly faces. There is absolutely no justification to demand this signature. In fact, they can accept Burris without it. The whole affair stinks to high heaven as far as Obama and the Senate is concerned. On January 20, Mr. Obama will swear to uphold and defend a document that he obviously does not understand. He has egg all over his face.

Report this

By mary, January 7 at 6:11 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Enjoyed your story immensely and yes, I had a good laught, too.  It is incredible that the 17th Amendment has waited 95 years to gain some much-needed notoriety and…Constitutional Laughter.  Those Senate clowns had 8 years to get off their high-paid posteriors and stop the Bush awe and shock agenda that destroyed the economy via lack of regulatory controls, enriched the already-rich (Bush family Saudi holdings, Haliburton, Cheney millions) and destroyed whatever national moral fibre and international good will was remaining before Ali Bushie and his gang of 40 plus thieves took over. Obama is like cinderella in all this mess. But he also has part of the “bad stepsister” gene in Him, too. He sat on his posterior awaiting his crowning by those morons who played the race-baiting card in conjunction with the winning misogyny card.  The dirty political sewers of Chicago from whose loins Obama sprung do not give anyone much confidence in his ability to do anything other than something prompted strictly for narcissistic, self-serving purposes. His most treasured skill, oratory powers, may not be sufficient without a political teleprompter to guide him. And this is not something Axelrod can buy for his protege, who may turn out to be Bush-lite at best….
Periodically, Barack will be launching attacks against his own to boost his appeal….It’ll be hilarious and let’s see how many comedians out there would be willing to share a laughter with us on this elected empty suit’s forthcoming bush-lite bumblings and blagovisms.
Remember what Barack said in N.C. debate back in January? “We don’t come to Politics with clean hands!”  I was shocked at the time. No more! Barry really meant it!

Report this

By dihey, January 6 at 3:48 pm #

I am not a Constitutional Scholar but I believe that the only word in that document which pertains to the Senate’s power to refuse seating Burris is “qualification”. In other words, only if Burris were legally “unqualified” could the Senate refuse to swear him in.
Since Burris is fully qualified any refusal to swear him in is a gross violation of our Constitution in my opinion. The Senators and PE Obama are doing exactly what they have accused President Bush of doing namely violate the Constitution. Amazing!
The notion that the Senate must have the approval of the Secretary of State of Illinois would be laughable if it was not yet another trick up the sleeves of these collective “Tricky Dickies”. That prerequisite is total nonsense.
The notion that the Senate has the power to deny seating Burris because he was appointed by a Governor they despise is a gigantically dangerous precedent. What next: a governor they believe is senile? Or a governor that loves “French Fries”? Or a Governor that likes X-rated movies?

Report this

By Stephen Smoliar, January 6 at 2:20 pm #

I agree with Invisigoth that there is probably more to this story than has been reported of its “surface structure.”  I am not yet ready to speculate on the “deep structure” as Invisigoth has done;  but I am willing to bet that it will reveal some unanticipated surprises.  The idea that the GOP may have been behind it all makes for far more fun than anything Marie has derived from the episode thus far!

Report this

By Invisigoth, January 6 at 12:48 pm #

Hasn’t anyone thought perhaps Blagojevich was provided with monetary or other GOP-backed incentive to do just what he did? It all seems a little too staged and more like a caricature of a scandal than a real scandal.  I agree that it is hilarious but it effectively blind-sides the first Democratic majority Senate.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.