Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
June 18, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     nsa     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Reporter Who Brought Down the 'Runaway General' Dead at 33

The Terror Con

Nate Silver vs. Politico: It's on Again

The Making of a Global Security State

IRS Conspiracy Theory Debunked, Rand Paul Answers Cheney Criticism, and More

Most Comments
Most Emailed

 * NEW! * The Making of a Global Security State
 * NEW! * Climate Change Puts Lake Life at Risk
The Terror Con



The Unwinding


Truthdig Bazaar

A Hologram for the King

By Dave Eggers
$25.00

more items

 
Reports

Who Believes There Is ‘Progress’ in the Middle East?

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Dec 28, 2008
Rafah burning
AP photo / Eyad Baba

Smoke rises from a burning building as Palestinians gather at the site of an Israeli missile strike in the Rafah refugee camp, southern Gaza Strip, on Sunday.

By Robert Fisk

Editor’s note: This article was originally printed in The Independent.

If reporting is, as I suspect, a record of mankind’s folly, then the end of 2008 is proving my point.

Let’s kick off with the man who is not going to change the Middle East, Barack Obama, who last week, with infinite predictability, became Time’s “person of the year”. But buried in a long and immensely tedious interview inside the magazine, Obama devotes just one sentence to the Arab-Israeli conflict: “And seeing if we can build on some of the progress, at least in conversation, that’s been made around the Israeli-Palestinian conflict will be a priority.”

What is this man talking about? “Building on progress?” What progress? On the verge of another civil war between Hamas and the Palestinian Authority, with Benjamin Netanyahu a contender for Israeli prime minister, with Israel’s monstrous wall and its Jewish colonies still taking more Arab land, and Palestinians still firing rockets at Sderot, and Obama thinks there’s “progress” to build on?

I suspect this nonsensical language comes from the mental mists of his future Secretary of State. “At least in conversation” is pure Hillary Clinton – its meaning totally eludes me – and the giveaway phrase about progress being made “around” the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is even weirder. Of course if Obama had talked about an end to Jewish settlement building on Arab land – the only actual “building” that is going on in the conflict – relations with Hamas as well as the Palestinian Authority, justice for both sides in the conflict, along with security for Palestinians as well as Israelis, then he might actually effect a little change.

Advertisement

An interesting test of Obama’s gumption is going to come scarcely three months after his inauguration when he will have a little promise to honour. Yup, it’s that dratted 24 April commemoration of the Armenian genocide when Armenians remember the 1.5 million of their countrymen – citizens of the Ottoman empire slaughtered by the Turks – on the anniversary of the day in 1915 when the first Armenian professors, artists and others were taken off to execution by the Ottoman authorities.

Bill Clinton promised Armenians he’d call it a “genocide” if they helped to elect him to office. George Bush did the same. So did Obama. The first two broke their word and resorted to “tragedy” rather than “genocide” once they’d got the votes, because they were frightened of all those bellowing Turkish generals, not to mention – in Bush’s case – the U.S. military supply routes through Turkey, the “roads and so on” as Robert Gates called them in one of history’s more gripping ironies, these being the same “roads and so on” upon which the Armenians were sent on their death marches in 1915. And Mr Gates will be there to remind Obama of this. So I bet you – I absolutely bet on the family cat – that Obama is going to find that “genocide” is “tragedy” by 24 April.

By chance, I browsed through Turkish Airlines’ in-flight magazine while cruising into Istanbul earlier this month and found an article on the historical Turkish region of Harput. “Asia’s natural garden”, “a popular holiday resort”, the article calls Harput, “where churches dedicated to the Virgin Mary rise next to tombs of the ancestors of Mehmet the Conqueror”.

Odd, all those churches, isn’t it? And you have to shake your head to remember that Harput was the centre of the Christian Armenian genocide, the city from which Leslie Davis, the brave American consul in Harput, sent back his devastating eyewitness dispatches of the thousands of butchered Armenian men and women whose corpses he saw with his own eyes. But I guess that all would spoil the “natural garden” effect. It’s a bit like inviting tourists to the Polish town of Oswiecim – without mentioning that its German name is Auschwitz.

But these days, we can all rewrite history. Take Nicolas Sarkozy, France’s cuddliest ever president, who not only toadies up to Bashar al-Assad of Syria but is now buttering up the sick and awful Algerian head of state Abdelaziz Bouteflika who’s just been “modifying” the Algerian constitution to give himself a third term in office.

There was no parliamentary debate, just a show of hands – 500 out of 529 – and what was Sarko’s response? “Better Bouteflika than the Taliban!” I always thought the Taliban operated a bit more to the east – in Afghanistan, where Sarko’s lads are busy fighting them – but you never can tell. Not least when exiled former Algerian army officers revealed that undercover soldiers as well as the Algerian Islamists (Sarko’s “Taliban”) were involved in the brutal village massacres of the 1990s.

Talking of “undercover”, I was amazed to learn of the training system adopted by the Met lads who put Jean Charles de Menezes to death on the Tube. According to former police commander Brian Paddick, the Met’s secret rules for “dealing” with suicide bombers were drawn up “with the help of Israeli experts”. What? Who were these so-called “experts” advising British policemen how to shoot civilians on the streets of London? The same men who assassinate wanted Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza and brazenly kill Palestinian civilians at the same time? The same people who outrageously talk about “targeted killings” when they murder their opponents? Were these the thugs who were advising Lady Cressida Dick and her boys?

Not that our brave peace envoy, Lord Blair, would have much to say about it. He’s the man, remember, whose only proposed trip to Gaza was called off when yet more “Israeli experts” advised him that his life might be in danger. Anyway, he’d still rather be president of Europe, something Sarko wants to award him. That, I suppose, is why Blair wrote such a fawning article in the same issue of Time which made Obama “person” of the year. “There are times when Nicolas Sarkozy resembles a force of nature,” Blair grovels. It’s all first names, of course. “Nicolas has the hallmark of any true leader”; “Nicolas has adopted…”; “Nicolas recognises”; “Nicolas reaching out…”. In all, 15 “Nicolases”. Is that the price of the Euro presidency? Or will Blair now tell us he’s going to be involved in those “conversations” with Obama to “build on some of the progress” in the Middle East?


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By Marques, September 4, 2009 at 5:14 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Badly need your help. She got her looks from her father. He’s a plastic surgeon.
I am from Cyprus and also am speaking English, give please true I wrote the following sentence: “Fabry’s fighting is preliminary, as he requires gasser’s hair for crime, and he passes outdoor colonizers and his aggregate shape hair hunters.”

Best regards :-D, Marques.

Report this

By dihey, December 31, 2008 at 7:31 am Link to this comment

It was recently pointed out on Truthdig that Israel gutted UN resolution 242 by claiming that it did not have to withdraw from all occupied territories. The pertinent passage reads: “Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict”.
However, by referring to UN 242 Israel has accepted that the West Bank is an “occupied territory” hence is under protection of the 4th Geneva Convention. It is therefore abundantly clear that Israels leaders since 242 are all war criminals. Why are Olmert et al. not in Scheveningen?

Report this

By mahesh, December 30, 2008 at 5:59 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

At this point I am not quite sure about the “strategic goals” (yes - I hate applying this phrase to the large scale massacre underway) Israel has here. Let’s enumerate the top few here :
1> Elections ? Well, Possible but less Probable - given the large scale bombing.
2> Cowering down of Hamas ? More likely - also notice the timing as entire world economy is staring in the face of Depression 2.0.
3> Test the support of incoming administration for a prolonged war ?? Likely.
4> Internal Economic crisis ? I rate this as the topmost reason to stave off local discontent.

Cyrena and others - am willing to be educated here.

Report this

By TAO Walker, December 29, 2008 at 3:56 pm Link to this comment

Cyrena is not mistaken in observing that “Native Americans” have served as the crash-test-dummies for what is now being applied ruthlessly to all theamericanpeople, of whatever “ethnic” derivation,  together.  She needn’t “puke,” though, on-behalf of us surviving free wild Turtle Island Natives, who are living to see THE END of the five-hundred-year-long “western” movie the un-reeling of which is the constant sub-text for all the articles and comments here variously lamenting and decrying the obscene content of its foregone conclusion.

Us wild Indians are alright, and we’ll be happy to help any number of our tame Sisters and Brothers get that way, too.

Hokahey!

Report this

By Fadel Abdallah, December 29, 2008 at 8:09 am Link to this comment

Answer:
As a concise answer to the rhetorical question, “Who believes there is progress in the Middle East?!” The answer for those who know history is that there will never be progress in the Middle East, because the very idea of creating this artificial entity called Israel was actually intended to halt progress from coming to the area by perpetuating conflict and bloodshed, the typical colonial mentality!

Diagnosis:
The fanatic Israeli Zionists suffer permanently from two deadly psychological disorders: One is related to the images and stories of the bloody Holocaust perpetrated against some of them by the Nazis, but always embellished to achieve maximum profit; the other is related to the images of the blood they keep shedding among the natives of Palestine! In light of this, their world view is colored by blood.

Prescription:
Fanatic bloody Zionists need help!
The point is that they are seriously sick and need to be saved from their bloody psychic. So it’s not save for them or to the world to live among normal people. For their own salvation, a huge psychiatric complex should be build for them, say in New York, where they might receive constant treatment! The healthy and sound Jews from all over the world, a there are good number of them, over should be employed to help their brethren!

Report this

By cyrena, December 29, 2008 at 4:10 am Link to this comment

Joanne,

Perfect corollary..

“The only thing the Palestinians have left is their pride.  Just as it took several hundred years to completely subdue the Native American people, the Palestinian resistance too will continue on.”

The Palestinian ‘resistance’ is their own right to self-determination, which the Jews seem to believe is their exclusive right, and not a Universal right.

Meantime, the tragedy is that the Native American people WERE subdued, and remain that way, as the most poverty stricken population in the nation. I wanna puke everything I think about it, which is often. Any careful study of the institution of racism in the US pretty much keeps this right in our faces, since there can be no denying that the country was founded on the backs of Natives and kidnapped Africans.

Report this

By iska, December 29, 2008 at 3:12 am Link to this comment

Jews are the chosen people. Allowing the worst of them to control the direction of their future, they are now the fallen people.

Report this

By cyrena, December 28, 2008 at 11:38 pm Link to this comment

1 of 2

Mill writes:

“..Mr. Fisk needs to take a chill pill.  The combatants will decide when peace breaks out among Jews and Muslims in the Israel/Palestine land.  Outsiders even one’s with middle names like Hussein - will be supporting cast always.  Mr. Obama’s comments will mean absolutely nothing, which is good at this point.  Mr. Fisk seems to desire otherwise, but why?”

~~~

My sentiments EXACTLY mill.

Fiske has been needing a chill pill for a while. He just gets crazier and crazier over time. He used to do some decent work, even though I’ve never considered him an ultimate authority on the Israel-Palestine conflict. He’s documented (and fairly well)the crimes of Israel in the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians, but to use him as only one source of information would result in very poor scholarship at this point. In fact, my primary academic advisory in Middle Eastern Studies and North African History told me to be ‘careful’ with Fiske as an academic source. It was a welcome ‘heads up’ because I later learned that most of what I wanted to use from his work could not be otherwise corroborated.

So, what DOES Mr. Fiske really ‘desire’ and what would he have Obama do on this day, or any other day between now and Jan 20th? Well, like most of the current Obama bashers, he doesn’t know, since he’s obviously disconnected from the reality of US politics and our bureaucratic apparatus. 

I suspect that it goes without saying that Obama’s very brief comment was *intentionally* brief and even I will admit -vague-. I suspect that to be very intentional as well. Obama’s official position to date has been that “Israel has the right to defend itself” and technically, they do. He KNOWS that Israel does NOT have the ‘right’ to persecute the Palestinians, but there’s little he can do about it, (not a single solitary other world leader or other political entity has done a damn thing, including the past 3 US administrations) until at least Jan 20th.

TBC

Report this

By cyrena, December 28, 2008 at 11:36 pm Link to this comment

2 of 2

Even then, my own suspicions suggest that he will rely heavily on the International Community to deal with Israel. At least that’s what I HOPE he will do, and he’s promised to clean up our act in terms of the current regimes DE-legitimization of the UN and the International Community. I don’t believe that Israel could have existed even this long, if the US hadn’t been consistently ‘protecting’ them on the world stage, by ignoring all of Israel’s UN violations.

Meantime, we SEE what happens to those who publicly criticize Israel. Had Obama gone that route, he not only wouldn’t be the President-elect, but he might have been cut down in the process of becoming such. Israel has a habit of assassinating those who speak out against their crimes.

However, as president, Obama really need not do much more than allow the rule of law to resume. He need do little more than the reverse of what previous administrations have done, which is to keep the US from bullying the remainder of the International Community with its constant interference at a disproportionate level. So I think we should be keeping an eyes on what Susan Rice, (his nomination for UN ambassador) is doing in her dealings with the rest of the UN on the issues in the Middle East.
Hilary Clinton is problematic in this respect, since she was ISRAEL’S choice for OUR President. (The arrogance in the mindset makes me crazy, but it’s not like Israel hasn’t been getting away with that for decades) Her interpretation of International Law is equally troubling, as was her husband’s when he chose to unilaterally attack in the Bosnia back during his Monica troubles, and the impeachment efforts that followed.  He was doing a ‘wag the dog’ routine in that episode, (because Slick Willy DOES know the laws) but she appears not to have a clue.

Still, at the end of the day, Barack Hussein Obama was elected by the AMERICAN people (NOT the Israelis or any other nation or population) with the hope that he could stop the free fall that is taking all of US down. In that respect, his views on the Israel-Palestine conflict are simply NOT important to the majority of Americans who voted for him. If that sounds callous, it probably is. But, it’s also the reality. The majority of voters didn’t hire Obama so he could make these atrocities in the Israel-Palestine conflict a priority, if only because the majority of Americans REMAIN unaware of the details of it, or the part that the US has played. I’m not suggesting that such ignorance is acceptable, because I would like US citizens to be more educated on this and much more, in terms of what our government is doing. But I AM suggesting that is the reality. We have HUGE problems of our own that need his immediate attention.

Report this
Tony Wicher's avatar

By Tony Wicher, December 28, 2008 at 10:50 pm Link to this comment

By Joanne Gullion, December 28 at 5:56 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

This is not a war between two parties this is a murderous assault on a desperately poor, humiliated and oppressed people.  It is just the last in a series of bloody attacks, against a near defenseless people.
———————————————————————————
Joanne,

I would call it a civil war, one that has been going on for sixty years. I see only two possible outcomes: war to extermination that will eventually involve the whole world, or reuniting into one country, a single, fully integrated multicultural democracy. I do not see any way to partition the land that will lead to peace. Since 1947 when the United Nations first granted the partition of the land, there has been civil war. We have spent sixty years digging ourselves into this hole, and we’re still digging, trying to find that elusive “two-state solution”. When will it dawn on everyone that partition is the problem, not the solution?

Report this
Tony Wicher's avatar

By Tony Wicher, December 28, 2008 at 9:37 pm Link to this comment

By mill, December 28 at 6:00 pm

Yeah, really. I don’t get it either. I guess Max is a psychic loose nuke.

Report this

By mill, December 28, 2008 at 7:00 pm Link to this comment

So, Max S ... to help my cranial extraction, what is it that makes you say such a hostile personal thing?

Report this

By Joanne Gullion, December 28, 2008 at 6:56 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

This is not a war between two parties this is a murderous assault on a desperately poor, humiliated and oppressed people.  It is just the last in a series of bloody attacks, against a near defenseless people.
When Israel had cut off electricity, gas, and almost all other supplies.
The only thing the Palestinians have left is their pride.  Just as it took several hundred years to completely subdue the Native American people, the Palestinian resistance too will continue on.

Report this

By danl, December 28, 2008 at 6:17 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Boycott Israel, Boycott Israel, Boycott Israel.
Pariah state.

Report this

By Louise, December 28, 2008 at 4:52 pm Link to this comment

Oh Little Town of Bethlehem ... Are you still there? Is there still some stubborn belief that Peace on Earth was born in you, that lovely night so many generations ago?

When did those who chose to teach the glorious birth as a great and glorious re-birth, decide the burning end was more important than the peaceful beginning?

I wonder, does man in his infinite stupidity think at the end of all their burning and bombing and killing, God will descend to save the bombers and burners and killers?

Or will God simply remember to look down one day and say, “Oh my look at this. I was all set to destroy this wicked world and now I need not bother. They have completely destroyed themselves.”

I daily see advertising on TV inviting me to vacation in beautiful Israel, and think ... no thanks. I’ll take my chances on beautiful collapsing America this year. At least here, we don’t drop bombs on the “poorer” neighborhood down the road. At least not near so often.

When someone blows up something here, they’re considered an anti-social criminal. When some nut commits a massacre here they’re considered some nut who committed a massacre.

Christmas In Gaza : No More Room In The Morgue.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article21551.htm

Report this
G.Anderson's avatar

By G.Anderson, December 28, 2008 at 4:18 pm Link to this comment

This is the holy land…..

but no peace will never come to it, as long people feel justified to use violence against one another..

each outrage, each act of violence, produces yet another justification for more, and more…

in the end this cycle of self destruction can only have one possible outcome…

only then will there be peace, when there is no one left alive…

it is not possible to hurt others without hurting oneself, even victory is a spiritual defeat…

Report this
Tony Wicher's avatar

By Tony Wicher, December 28, 2008 at 3:59 pm Link to this comment

God I hate Tony Blair. He is a snake descended from a line of snakes going all the way back to Atlantis. He makes me want to puke. He’s going to be the president of Europe?

Report this

By Max Shields, December 28, 2008 at 3:53 pm Link to this comment

Dick and Mill,

Someone ought to drop a 1/2 megaton on your little neighborhoods. Maybe then you’ll get your head out of your respective asses.

Report this

By TAO Walker, December 28, 2008 at 2:37 pm Link to this comment

When already grandiose delusions “go nuclear,” so-to-say, that “chain reaction” Oppenheimer feared would burn-up the atmosphere from Trinity Site actually does take place within the positive-feedback-loop of lunacy that passes for “statecraft” here at the end of days.  Those even moderately awake and alert might sensibly see in such phenomenally inadequate official responses as Robert Fisk catalogues here (and which are amply in-evidence virtually everywhere one looks in this virtual “world”) an admission, by those nominally “in-charge,” of their utter helplessness to address (to any mutually beneficial effect) even ONE among the perfect storm of “problems” overwhelming their world’s institutional and technological arrangments.

Here at the-hubs-of-hell, tame Sisters and Brothers, your “leaders,” however selected, are telling you as plainly as they dare:  YOU ARE ALL ON YOUR OWN!  IT’S EVERY MAN FOR HIMSELF! and, THE DEVIL TAKE THE LOSERS!

Don’t believe that for a minute.  The domesticated peoples are in fact all stuck in this together, and can only extricate one another, if at all, TOGETHER.  Chances are it is the so-called “lower orders” who will see this long before their self-proclaimed “betters.”  When they finally do, this old Indian recommends not waiting-around for the high-and-mighty to figure it out.  Just go ahead and do what every fiber of your Human Being will be telling you to do.

Take The Good Red Road to the Tiyoshpaye Way.

HokaHey!

Report this

By mill, December 28, 2008 at 2:27 pm Link to this comment

lesseeeee ....  Jews and Muslims in dispute over territory for more than a millenium

President Carter wins Nobel prize for getting Egypt and Israel to reduce animosity.  It doesn’t make Israel more secure, it turns out.

Mr. Obama isn’t even president yet.  But he should say _________ about what’s going on, because there’s been no progress lately, and his incredibly brief comment suggests there has been? 

Mr. Fisk needs to take a chill pill.  The combatants will decide when peace breaks out among Jews and Muslims in the Israel/Palestine land.  Outsiders even one’s with middle names like Hussein - will be supporting cast always.  Mr. Obama’s comments will mean absolutely nothing, which is good at this point.  Mr. Fisk seems to desire otherwise, but why?

Report this

By dick, December 28, 2008 at 2:11 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

In Palestine, some Jews want to kill all Muslims and some Muslims want to kill all Jews, and they are all neighbors.  Thus, the mayhem, destruction and killing will continue, and with approval and support from the USA, moreover.

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.