LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
2010 Webby Award Winner for Best Political Blog
 
February 20, 2012
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Acts of Love

OWS Calls for May Day Strike

Ideological Hypocrites

Krugman to Playboy: Economic Crisis 'Doesn't Have to Be Happening'

When Iran Talks Back

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Acts of Love
 * NEW! * Ideological Hypocrites
The Lowdown on Fracking

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Déjà Pooh

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

Blundering U.S. Should Spare the World Any More Nation Building

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   

Posted on Dec 16, 2008

By William Pfaff

Early in December, the press reported from the Barack Obama transition team that the president-elect has signed onto a foreign policy program continuing the “war against terror” on new, expanded and fundamentally changed terms. The United States will attack the sources of the problem of terrorism. It will start from scratch in “rogue,” “failed” and other distressed Middle Eastern, South Asian and African states, to build them up into modern democracies.

The Washington foreign policy community has been working on this idea. Condoleezza Rice announced last summer that new, multi-agency teams were being formed to move into countries to build democratic institutions and practices there, in addition to providing traditional aid. “Democratic state-building,” she said, was the “new American wisdom.” Robert Gates, who will continue as defense secretary in the Obama administration, has already endorsed the substance of this program. Washington will—in Secretary Rice’s words—“change the world in America’s image.”

Let me change the subject for a moment. Recent days have brought information on a 513-page federal report on the American-led reconstruction of American-destroyed Iraq, which has proved to be a $100-billion disaster, incorporating ignorant assumptions, waste, organizational chaos, bureaucratic and personal rivalries, lies and incompetence.

According to the document, during the past five years little more has been accomplished than restoration of the basic services and productive capacity that was destroyed by the American invasion and the looting that followed.

This is after killing or wounding—how many, a half million?—Iraqi civilians in order to liberate them. No wonder the Iraqi journalist threw his shoes at George W. Bush at the president’s farewell Baghdad news conference, and shouted “you dog!”—the worst insults possible in Arabic culture. This happened because no one in responsibility knew what they were doing, beyond the military objectives. The neoconservatives assured the president that America built democracies in Germany and Japan after the war. Surely Iraq would be easier yet. No one in power asked anyone who was there in Germany or Japan, or bothered to consult the records, which are ample.

Advertisement

Japan was “democratized” because the emperor, having been informed that such was the wish of Gen. Douglas MacArthur, ordered his people to become democrats. Japan had a parliament and constitutional monarchy before the war, then became a military dictatorship, and by fiat became a constitutional democracy again after the war.

The British and American occupation authorities in Germany in 1945 began “denazification” but soon found that, as most official positions in the country had required Nazi Party membership, if they denazified Germany there would be no one to run it. They settled for prosecuting actual war criminals. As the Cold War then began, they let the Germans get on with installing a democratic system as ordered (Germany had been a parliamentary democracy before Hitler and his party were democratically elected). The first thing the Bush administration did in its crusade to democratize Iraq was to fire all the people who knew how to run it.

Something else has happened recently that bears on the issue of American official competence. This was the confession by one of the most respected men on Wall Street, former chairman of the NASDAQ exchange, that he had for years been running a simple Ponzi pyramid swindle (paying high returns to established customers out of the funds newcomers invest). With this, on his own account, he stole $50 billion from individuals, including sophisticated investors, as well as banks in the United States and abroad.

Bernard Madoff seems to have done this over a 40-year period (he started his investment firm in 1960), despite three Securities and Exchange Commission investigations, formal complaints to the SEC from competitors, conspicuous secrecy about his clients and methods, published accounts going unquestioned despite being prepared by an obscure two-man auditing firm, and persistent Wall Street rumors and suspicions. It may be the biggest financial swindle ever committed.

It comes at an unfortunate moment for American-style capitalism, which it has been the U.S. aim to install worldwide. The capitalist world suffers a liquidity crisis and impending catastrophe that may prove worse than the Great Depression of the 1930s. It has been caused by American financial fraud and incompetence. Following this evidence of American fiasco in running its own affairs, let me return to the subject of a foreign policy devoted to remaking other countries “in the American image.”

The conclusions of the report on American reconstruction of Iraq included the following statement: “Five years after embarking on its largest foreign reconstruction project since the Marshall Plan in Europe after World War II, the U.S. government has in place neither the policies and technical capacity nor the organizational structure that would be needed to undertake such a program.” I would think this should be written in fiery letters over the portal of the future president Barack Obama’s National Security Council.

Visit William Pfaff’s Web site at www.williampfaff.com.

© 2008 Tribune Media Services, Inc.


Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By KDelphi, December 22, 2008 at 1:45 am Link to this comment

Sephared—What Pastor is Obama going to use, then? (None, I wish!) Do you have any idea? It seems that every president uses a christian pastor.

It is not that I think that he is going to use Warren for advice on social policy (I hope not!) It is just a pattern of , to me, making it seem like that last 8 yrs of societal evangelism, is ok, just a “differwnt viewpoint”. I dont think that that is true. There has never been another religion, in recent times, that has tried so hard to inject itself into the govt of the uS.

The problem with evangelism, as practiced by Warren, and others, is that, its very beliefs insist that they insert themselves into peoples’ personal lives , in order to save them from the most terrible fate imaginable! If they really believe that to be true, would they stop at anything to ‘save their brothers from that kind of hell”?

I worry that people who dont live in states where there are alot of evangelicals just dont know how ‘rabid” these people can be…

It is time that someone stopped the evangelicals judgemental wing of the christian church.That is my opinion.

Report this

By Sepharad, December 21, 2008 at 2:48 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

KDelphi, Agree Pastor Warren is a big problem, but he is also a transient one-prayer-one-time-and-he’s-outtahere problem. At least I’ve read nothing that makes me think Warren’s appearance is a one-shot. Obama is not famous for good judgment in picking his religious leaders, but everyone knew that before voting for him. I don’t think he is really tied in, emotionally or politically, to “My pastor says ...” advice. I’d worry if he was giving Warren a cabinet or agency or commission post or something like that.

Report this
Clash's avatar

By Clash, December 20, 2008 at 10:29 am Link to this comment

It seems that the Obama administration will have to find troops from other sources to do more nation building as up to 35 brigades may need to be left in Iraq as reported by Global Report. Then again he only promised to remove the combat troops, 15 brigades or so.

The US will have troops in Iraq much longer than 2011, Gates is planning to send an additional 20,000 troops to Afghanistan bring the total to approximately 54,000 soldiers on the ground. We still haven’t found what we were looking for in Afghanistan.

Gates and general McKiernan were quoted while traveling to Afghanistan “Let’s put it in historical perspective — this country has been at war for the last 30 years,” General McKiernan told reporters, using the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 as the starting point. “Thirty years. That’s not going to stop overnight. So if your question is, might it get worse before it gets better, the answer is yes, it might.”

Blundering our politicians have not stopped blundering since Vietnam what makes anyone think they will stop now.

KDelphi;

Warren is a fascist zealot.

Report this

By KDelphi, December 20, 2008 at 8:15 am Link to this comment

The APPARENT “lack of it” in our present president, may have made many people put too much emphasis on intelligence. It is underastandable, and, more is better than less. (although Bush was never stupid in the common sense of the term).But , it is certainly not, in itself, enough. I am thinking some of the things you are…but, also , some other problems…

Pastor Warren is a big problem..

Report this

By Sepharad, December 18, 2008 at 5:57 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

KDelphi—(Haven’t yet heard anyone TDer say a good word for Mugabe or Janjaweed but it wouldn’t surprise me, as the former was an anti-colonial hero and the latter are Arab fighters. And if their victims weren’t mostly black the descriptor of choice would probably be “freedom fighters”.)

Some modest isolationism for awhile while we rebuild our own country (jobs and schools) really isn’t such a terrible idea. Being a third-rate power would be a relief, if the rest of the world would leave us alone. My husband thinks the Moslems would be happy if we just pulled our bases out of the Middle East, and we’d probably do that if we didn’t need the darned oil to function. Am counting on Obama to push for nothing less than a full court press on alternative fuel sources—and not just corn. I don’t know what it would take to get Americans out of the SUVs, as the threat of war and killing off our species via global warming hasn’t had the reaction you’d expect. Maybe threat of extinction has to be a more immediate-seeming possibility—while in Israel I didn’t see anything but small cars (except for produce trucks, vet trucks, contractor trucks and the like), and in 5 years all those little cars will be plug-ins. Sometimes not having any oil at all is a great incentive.  `

Re BHD, I think the UN asked Clinton to literally send in the marines after one particular warlord massacred 127 Pakistani UN Peacekeeper troops who were trying to keep his men from grabbing the food off UN trucks to bargain for political advantage. Clinton pulled US troops out after the spectacle of a dead, stripped American soldier being dragged through the streets shocked and awed American tv viewers.

I’m slightly puzzled by Obama’s picks but remain fairly confident that he has strong opinions of his own, wants real questions and debate to take place in his government rather than everyone saying “yes yes fine fine”—then realizing there’s been a huge rolling policy debacle because of some factors his people weren’t telling him about. Also am heartened to see that there are 4,000 or so different early-education groups meeting around the country already so when he steps into the White House there will be something more than ready to go.

Only real concern is his seeming intent to pursue war on terror in a big way, particularly as he no longer has to talk tough for the benefit of a skittish electorate on the campaign trail. On the other hand, if there is something he knows that we don’t maybe he’s doing what he thinks he needs to do. Main comfort: whatever he does it won’t be as wacked out and ill-informed as Bush, and probably not unilateral either. Will just have to wait and see. And hope. I’ve been known to put too high a value on brains and intelligence, however, but better to have a smart President who at least doesn’t embarrass us and seems to embrace science and justice.

Report this

By KDelphi, December 18, 2008 at 4:32 pm Link to this comment

Sepharad—sounds good to me! (Who have you heard on td that defends Mugabe or the Janjaweed?)

It is not “isolationism”—we need to regroup and rethink our place among other nations. We are a f*cking mess! If the Asian countries crack down on buying up our debt—we will have no choice! This could be our salvation…to force us to get our own house in order..

If we are continue our current foreign policies (including “war on terror”) we are screwed. We will stay broke, despised, and, we’re not “helping” anyone anyway.

Black Hawk Down was a direct result of our policies in other Muslim countries..it was also, conveniently, made into a movie in January 2002—right in the middle of “US heroics jingoism”.

Alot of that fight was actually done, by Malaysian allies..I saw the original tapes. They made me throw up—really.I thought of mothers, siblings, etc.

Then, I thought, who made such a drastic mistake? I guess opinions might differ, ie, military, civilians on the ground, Malaysians, etc. But, if BHD was “helping” someone , I sure as hell dont know who.

Report this

By Sepharad, December 18, 2008 at 2:50 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

We can barely handle nation-building at home these days, and are in no position to do anymore Marshall Plans for anyone. The wonderful Chinese government is on a roll—maybe they can ante up—and Sudan can make sure human rights are not violated in the third world. The next time there is a famine in Somalia, the Janjaweed can fight the warlords off long enough to distribute food to hungry people. No more Blackhawks down. No more US blood and treasure for Arab oil, no worries about countries like Zimbabwe that went from a highpoint of literate, well-fed people to illiterate starving children since Ian Smith left and the great man of the people Robert Mugabe took over. Practical isolation forever except for unlimited immigration forever. What a world that would be. (Just kidding for the most part; but for once just wanted to see what it felt like to agree with the average truthdigger.)

Report this

By samosamo, December 18, 2008 at 10:17 am Link to this comment

It may be that other countries may want a government of democracy, but it damn sure is not the american style which is anything but a democracy. Here is a little piece from msnbc on South Korea’s response to a ‘free trade’ agreement with the US:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28295945/

There are a lot of people waking up to the BS the US spreads for a very few people’s benefit. ‘Trickle down’ is not an option for a lot of people these days.

Report this

By Lennerd, December 18, 2008 at 10:08 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Fadel Abdallah (comment of Dec. 16) is right. We cannot hope to remove the specks in the eyes of the other countries in the world until we remove the log that is in our own eye! (That’s a Biblical reference for you literature lovers out there.)

Yes, read Chalmers Johnson and Andrew Bacevich and know that we (the USA) are on a probably irreversible slide into imperialism, fascism, and all the stuff like that that has happened before. And the point that military power collapses with the collapse of economic power is worth noting here. Underlying this and the speck/log eye problem is (again, Johnson and Bacevich) the myth, widely held and believed, of American exceptionalism. But. . .

Go see the chilling YouTube video. Type in FEMA concentration camp and watch what comes up. Train tracks leading to large areas fenced in with razor wire tops and guard towers. Whew. Plus ca change. . .

Report this

By msgmi, December 18, 2008 at 9:37 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

The global democratic change Condi is speaking about is an exercise in an on-going deception.  The Soviet ideologues had the same perception as did the 19th century Euro-colonialists. The current counter-terrorism startegy initaited in post-9/11 is froth with misconceptions and illusions. Ironically, fear and insecurity is morphing the pillars of our democracy through political hubris.

Report this

By prgill, December 18, 2008 at 7:07 am Link to this comment

This is a great thread, I’m sorry I missed it.

Purplegirl your comments are much appreciated.

If only we could spend as much energy communicating outside of our circle as we do amongst ourselves.

William Pfaff, I love the irony.

Truthdig, keep it up!

Report this

By hippy pam, December 18, 2008 at 6:54 am Link to this comment

There isn’t any one out there-if they have half a brain-wanting to be like america…...we have no jobs-illiterate children-no health care-we are fat-many are on welfare[and like it that way]-our infrastructure[roads-bridges-wiring-piping] is ancient and crumbling-our kids have no values-and we are arrogant.Most of us don’t even want to BE LIKE AMERICA.

Report this

By paschn, December 18, 2008 at 6:16 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

“Easy Now! We’d better focus on Reclaiming OUR nation First. We are not a Democracy Nor are We a Free market. We are the last frontier to be conquered by the Corps, and we are almost there”

Hi Purple,
Wanna see how little we have to say to our “leaders” as a society?
Demmand your representatives nationalize energy and the media. Tell them, as a people, we no longer trust them with the job of overseeing OUR natural resources…Tell them that by removing what LITTLE federal regulation governing the acquisition of too many media sources by one company they have betrayed us and our families.
The FIRST thing they’ll do is scurry to the real owners of this country, the Zionists, and ask for an audience to find out how they should handle us.
Then, with AIPAC’S answer and instructions in hand,...they’ll ignore you, (if your lucky)or Rothschild et al will have the media THEY control front page a mass of excelsior to warp and twist the facts into a “spin” to get the people to see things their way, in SUCH a way, as to make the 75% in this country who actually FIT the moniker of “lemming” think that THEY have any say so.

Report this

By cyrena, December 18, 2008 at 4:18 am Link to this comment

Amen Spirtgirl!!

You always say it so well:

•  “..You are starting from the premise that those nations want “to be like America” - that is not what they want!  And America needs to wake up to the fact that “we are not free”, “we are not democratic”, “we are not fair” either in our dealing with each other in this nation or the nations that we do dealings with! We need to establish the “rule of law” here in this country - first off IMPEACHMENT of the whole Bush Administration!”

In all fairness, I don’t know if Pfaff actually writes from this premise, though I can see where it might seem that way. I think more to the point though, is that the average American DOES believe that all other nation states “want to be like America.” Surely that’s what the current Imperial Dynasty has determined to instill in the mindprint of the world. Americans have been socialized to believe that, and for those who don’t have a frame of reference to which they can make their own comparisons, (and most Americans don’t, because most Americans don’t move about the globe that extensively) it almost becomes cultural/traditional “USA” mentality, or dare I say a dangerous form of nationalism.

One thing that Pfaff does NOT distinguish though, is the difference between the US hedgemonic understanding of “democracy” and the understanding that everyone else in the world has. Pfaff seems to imply, (or it could be my own interpretation) that these countries are rejecting the consideration of democratic societies in part because it doesn’t coordinate with the culture of the Middle East. But I would argue that many of the societies or nation states are perfectly welcoming of a democratically based government structure.  What American’s don’t get is that it doesn’t have to be ANYTHING like the alleged US version of “Democracy”. It can ONLY be a democracy if the people form it themselves, since the Laws of any given society can only be written and agreed upon in terms of the culture, (or diversity thereof) of the society that is governing itself.

Democracy cannot be ‘exported’ between nation states, and legal systems cannot be transplanted so casually either, because the culture and traditions of the population that plans to govern itself obviously have to be part and parcel of the set-up. Otherwise, it’s not a “Democracy”.  Instead, it’s the same as it’s always been whenever the geopolitical highrollers of the West have been in action…Colonialization.

So, it’s never been about Liberation, or Nation Building, or spreading democracy with the current thugs at all. Not in Afghanistan, and not in Iraq. It’s been about the standard invade and conquer to capture the resources as well as the geopolitically strategic positioning in the Middle East. That’s all this has ever been about. Destabilization being the first step in the colonization of a resistant indigenous population. And why the hell shouldn’t ANY Indigenous population reject and resist the presence of a foreign entity? That seems like a no brainer for anyone. But, I know it isn’t. 

The scariest part is that for those who can figure that out, and figure it out quite well…like Dick Cheney, it doesn’t matter. Cheney never claimed to be doing any “Nation Building” in Iraq or Afghanistan, and Rumsfeld very specifically stated that the US was NOT into nation Building.
Of course not. They were into ‘resource appropriation’. That was always a primary prong of the agenda, and in that, they’ve been overwhelmingly successful…having lined their pockets with sums of money that I can’t even begin to imagine.

This is of course the root of most of the evil, so it’s imperative that Obama have a crystal clear understanding of this, if he really wants to accomplish the kind of overhaul that is the only salvation. I hope he gets it.

Report this

By KDelphi, December 17, 2008 at 11:25 pm Link to this comment

Hell, I dont even want to “be American” anymore…

Report this

By Double U, December 17, 2008 at 5:26 pm Link to this comment

Make that “no doubt, Pfaff.”

Report this

By Double U, December 17, 2008 at 5:26 pm Link to this comment

No dounbt Pfaff.

Report this

By Zhu Bajie, December 17, 2008 at 4:40 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Isn’t there some legit way to punish these war criminals?  Throw them from the Tarpeian Rock or something?  If Johnson and Nixon & Co. had been punished after Viet Nam, the Bushies might have been afraid to do it all over again, and worse.

Zhu Bajie

Report this

By Spiritgirl, December 17, 2008 at 3:18 pm Link to this comment

“It will start from scratch in “rogue,” “failed” and other distressed Middle Eastern, South Asian and African states, to build them up into modern democracies.”

You are starting from the premise that those nations want “to be like America” - that is not what they want!  And America needs to wake up to the fact that “we are not free”, “we are not democratic”, “we are not fair” either in our dealing with each other in this nation or the nations that we do dealings with! We need to establish the “rule of law” here in this country - first off IMPEACHMENT of the whole Bush Administration!  Next with the crooks that have both driven this economy off the cliff, and now want to be bailed out!

Report this

By Artist General, December 17, 2008 at 11:53 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Well-I$n’t-that-$pecial!
and now they’re free…
in broad daylight, serving putrid food, for instance, and carrying DA$ Booty “openly”, unaccountably unaccountable, business-as-usual. FULLselfSERVICE.

http://flickr.com/photos/30213629@N07/2829658118/in/pool-828437@N25

Report this

By paschn, December 17, 2008 at 10:44 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

“I agree in principle that the American people should attack the sources of the problem of terrorism. And that’s why they should start at home with the terrorists from within.”

Hi Fadel, I agree. However…that would make Israel VERY angry….And we all know what Israel does when they get angry..they attack and murder their “Goyim” friends in the U.S. and U.K., refuse to take our billions for DAYS on end until godspeakers like Robertson apologize, (Hmm, does that mean God DIDN’T talk to him or was he apologizing to Israel for god AND himself??).
Much like Rahm(bo)‘s daddy did in the ‘40’s and ‘50’s.

Report this

By felicity, December 17, 2008 at 9:38 am Link to this comment

There’s the assumption, voiced by Rice and wafting through the hallowed halls of DC like swamp gas, that everyone in the world really wants to be an American. As long as that pernicious assumption continues, America’s imperial romps will continue.

As to the high cost of our invasion, when the troops leave, if ever, will the contractors leave also?  A Blackwater security guard makes $1,222/day (a sergeant $41/day, a sunni militia fighter $16/day, Petraeus {made} $493/day). If not, and if future empire-building sieges include the likes of Blackwater, we can forget 90 percent of Obama’s projected programs ever getting off the ground.

Report this

By davidperi, December 17, 2008 at 8:55 am Link to this comment

Just think of the waste.  A 100 Billion failure in reconstruction of Iraq.  Just one of the failures.  Listen to Amy and her first report on:

http://www.democracynow.org

Then another with 50 Billion with ole Uncle Ben Madoff.  Shame…shame..shame..now all this is coming out in the 1st decade of 2000.  What else is in the wind?

Report this

By paschn, December 17, 2008 at 6:09 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

“This is after killing or wounding—how many, a half million?—Iraqi civilians in order to liberate them”

Excuse me? lancet and Johns-Hopkins together put it at well over that a year and a half ago.
Further,....all your adjectives try to paint a picture of incompetence rather than corruption, greed and murder so hard, one would think someone in the Bush Crime family signs your check.
Then you leave Afghqanistan’s murdered completey out ALONG with the crimes (c)ommited against New Orleans.
Bottom line? The media, along with that swine slithering the halls of the “White” house, BOTH are guilty of duping “our boys” into slaughter. For which,(I hope), they suffer night terrors and wake up screaming all the rest of their “hero” lives UNTIL THEIR CREATOR TELLS THEM, “SORRY “BOYS”, BLIND FAITH WAS A ROCK BAND, NOT A FREE PASS FOR MURDER”. And now,...You lemmings will let that murdering bastard and all his toadies WALK!! grrrr.

Report this
Purple Girl's avatar

By Purple Girl, December 17, 2008 at 6:07 am Link to this comment

Easy Now! We’d better focus on Reclaiming OUR nation First. We are not a Democracy Nor are We a Free market. We are the last frontier to be conquered by the Corps, and we are almost there.
Really Now, we must Reclaim our constitutional Rights, Our Free and Fair Elections, Access to the Free market that serves Citizens (not brick & mortar), Equalize our Civil and Human rights….Basically Recapture OUR Declaration of Independence from any source which attempts to hinder the Country Built For the People and By the People.
I really see little difference between ‘Merry Ol’ English rule and this current ‘nobility’ of Corporations. Trickle Down was the Obvious Economic statedgy which Pissed Our ancestors off enough to wage a ‘ice cubes chance in hell’ War over. Family Crest or Logo is Irrelevant! Case in Point: Just Gave CitiGroup 300 billion. I just got my monthly Citibank credit card statement…They just jacked up the Default rate to 29.99%-  One payment late or missed.And we are card members in Good Standing! And they are not alone in this ‘screw them both ways to sunday’.
Control over OUR industry,Our Wages, our health, our finances, our education, our incarceration, Our Retirement, Our energy, Our food, OUR DEFENSE… has been given over to a Corp entity…‘to big to Fail’...Oh they fail constantly, It’s only that WE must now not allow them to fail once they have.
The goal of any Big Corp is to LIMIT the Competition, not encourage it. Thus is is the antithesis of a Free Market Doctrine.
Granted some industries require mass amounts of labor, thus having such large entities are benficial to the people- ie manufacturering.But Others are detrimental not only to the system, but the to citizens ei- energy, Financial. Isn’t it obvious Repugs hate the free market doctrine, since they hate when workers (citizens) trade their labor as a commodity on the market -esp collectively. Ok to drive up Oil Prices to increase profit margins, but citizens can not try to get the best return on their investment of labor? Wages and benefits ah? Why is a CEO able to negotiate a Salary, but a line worker is not? It’s not only undermines the Free market concept at it’s core, but undermines the doctrine which it canolevers off…Democracy is a Gov’t of Individuals Not Multinational conglomerates.
If you are going to Fly the Ameircan flag, You do not crush competition, Nor undermine the Workforce and certianly do not Screw the customer!
If We can Get that Corrected, We won’t have to go to other countries to ‘liberate’ them, they will once again look towards US as an example worth emulating. If we can do it so can They.
Really who thinks anyone wants to emulate US for the last 8 yrs? It’s been a disgrace and a travesty!

Report this

By darren, December 16, 2008 at 10:27 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Israel needs a regime change. Why haven’t Amercian troops been sent in to effect one?

Report this
prole's avatar

By prole, December 16, 2008 at 9:50 pm Link to this comment

No wonder one would want to change the subject - for a moment or for a lifetime. The thought of “The Washington foreign policy community”  working on an idea - especially one involving the ghastly Condoleezza Rice - is too gruesome to contemplate for long. The only thing more unnerving is the chilling thought of the Obama hacks “signed onto” it and picking up the cudgel.  It’s a little puzzling how “The United States will attack the sources of the problem of terrorism. It will start from scratch in ‘rogue’,  ‘failed’ and other distressed Middle Eastern, South Asian and African states, to build them up into modern democracies”. Peachy. The world can’t even agree on a common definition of ‘terrorism’, let alone precisely define the sources of it. Nor can it fully agree a definition of ‘democracy’. Right now, in Gaza, - probably the most “distressed” (stillborn) ‘state’ - hundreds of thousands of people are mired in squalor and starvation because they voted the wrong way in a free and fair election that was disapproved by the U.S. and Israel.  Hamas, the victor in the democratic election is branded a ‘terrorist organization’ by Israel and its U. S. and European vassal states. At the same time, Israel and its Western lackeys refer to themselves as ‘democracies’. The ‘rogue’ ‘failed’ administration of Bush & Rice in collusion with the ‘rogue’ failed’ administration of Ohlmert and Livni (and predecessors) “expanded and fundamentally changed terms” to suit ulterior aims. Just like they “expanded and fundamentally changed terms” of the explanation of the motives for the invasion of Iraq. America has probably killed a million or more in Iraq in this latest assault, but it was never originally - or even now - “in order to liberate them”. The original pretext was about WMD. It’s not at all clear that neo-con planners - most of them with dual loyalty to Israel - ever had any intention of building genuine democracy in Iraq even if they did have the “policies and technical capacity [and] the organizational structure that would be needed to undertake” it. Remaking other countries “in the American image.”  would only mean supporting a corrupt ruling elite who swindle and supress their own population, the same as in the U.S. itself. The experience of Hamas would convincingly argue against any belief in the sincerity of America’s democratic intentions in the Middle East at least, and no doubt elsewhere. The very idea of a ‘rogue’, ‘failed’ Secretary of State like Condoleezza Rice even making such an announcement is enough to give it the lie. For Obama Copacabana and his Likudnik retreads to expand on such notions should cause a lot more Iraqi and Palestinian shoes to fly. AIPAC stooge Obama and his new rogue Sec. of State Hillary have pledged to maintain the diplomatic embargo on the democratically-elected government of Hamas, while the ‘democratic’ state of Israel continues its military/economic embargo ‘Crime Against Humanity’.  “Five years after embarking on its largest foreign reconstruction project since the Marshall Plan” an obscure Iraqi journalist shouted at the American rogue president’s farewell Baghdad news conference,  “you dog!”— “I would think this should be written in fiery letters over the portal of the future president Barack Obama’s National Security Council.”

Report this
Clash's avatar

By Clash, December 16, 2008 at 9:49 pm Link to this comment

Deficit spending leads to mandatory conscription, lack of employment leads to economic conscription and conscription into the military leads to………….

It seems to me that this is the only way to wake people up, once forced to choose between the lottery of death or becoming a criminal we may find many more people willing to take the risk of fighting back.

It’s a hard road.

Report this

By KDelphi, December 16, 2008 at 9:48 pm Link to this comment

Then, WHY isnt it “written in fiery letters over Obama’s Natl Security Council..”?? One reason, is ,that , he is keeping Gates…and others..

It the same article , you say that Obama’s Team has all but “signed on” for the “war on terror”..

So someone doesnt think that the US is failing, just Dubya?? LOL! The US LET this happen folks! Democrat, GOP and Independents! Only a brave few in Congress spoke up…

It was pretty lonely out on street corners and in front of military bases this time, too…where were all out Democratic, peace-loving (except for “war on terror”) “liberals” in the Democratic Party? Busy censoring Kucinich?

BTW—where are they Now?! For realizing that the “war in Iraq was a mistake”, I dont see any of those wise people , who knew it was a mistake , on his Team…

Another HUGE mistake, was the use of all these private contracots, but, not a single politician has made any serius attempts to reign them in.

Report this

By milton, December 16, 2008 at 9:25 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

the myth that America is a benevolent country that seeks to spread freeddom, democracy and wealth to the rest of the world is only believed by Americans. America, for the last 100 years or so, was the nation that participated and caused the most wars in the world. and for only two reasons: political or economical. if a country has economical resources that America wants, America takes it, one way or the other. and if a country has policies that are contrary to America’s interests, America will destroy it, no matter what it takes. I hope president-elect Obama does not persue the same path.

Report this
Clash's avatar

By Clash, December 16, 2008 at 9:05 pm Link to this comment

So this is the great progressive plan more gun barrel democracy. Now thats really a CHANGE. So much for social justice.

Stupid me no such thing as the N.W.O, and there is no warrant for kissengers arrest as awar criminal.

I know, Iknow it will all be different next January.

Report this
Anarcissie's avatar

By Anarcissie, December 16, 2008 at 7:56 pm Link to this comment

“Nation-building” (and its complement, nation-destroying) is a necessary component of the global domination and world empire the U.S. ruling class is determined to achieve and maintain—or at least participate in, if they can’t control it completely.  There will always be unsatisfactory nations which, like Vietnamese villages, they will have to destroy in order to save; save meaning to install democracy meaning capitalism meaning domination by foreign corporations.

Apparently the only fiery letters which the monarchical president and his acolytes can see are “Hail, Caesar.”  But in truth we may be present at Belshazzar’s feast.

Report this

By Muscleboy, December 16, 2008 at 7:40 pm Link to this comment

The US isn’t blundering, it’s criminal hijackers are, they are destroying the USA in cahoots with a crooked press. These criminals will do and say anything it takes to steal our money and power. 

We must take it back.

Report this

By Don Stivers, December 16, 2008 at 7:17 pm Link to this comment

Pastor Wright WAS right!  The chickens are coming home to roost. 

And at what price to the people responsible for this?

The screw ups cost LIVES!!  Who pays??
The screw ups cost money!!  Who pays??

Bush and the rest of the politicians will retire and collect their pay.  The rest of the world suffers.

Where is the GOD DAMNED justice???

I’m glad that man threw his shoe at our president.  It’s starting a movement.  I hope it keeps going.

Report this

By Folktruther, December 16, 2008 at 6:16 pm Link to this comment

Cann4ing, quoting Chalmers Johnson, states the crux of the matter in two short paragraphs. And then supports Obiden who is bent on continuing Bush’s War On Terrorism masking US military imperialism.

Johnson, in the last book of his triolgy NEMESIS, also stetes that what is most likely to stop US militarism is economic bankruptcy.  It would also help to mobilize the population against the warterrorism that the US is practicing.

Report this

By Fadel Abdallah, December 16, 2008 at 5:14 pm Link to this comment

I agree in principle that the American people should attack the sources of the problem of terrorism. And that’s why they should start at home with the terrorists from within.

There in America the worst form of state-sponsored terrorism! There is in America economic terrorism by the greedy criminals put in charge of the chickens sheds! There is in America moral terrorism against the poor and the disadvantaged! There is in America thought terrorism by certain ivy league institutions against public education! There is in America economic terrorism practiced by the 1% dirty rich against the crushed and indebted masses!

And I can go on and on describing the different forms of terrorism practiced by the political-military-industrial-Wall Street establishments against the average American citizen! And that’s why Americans should turn to fighting terrorism from within!

Report this

By cann4ing, December 16, 2008 at 4:19 pm Link to this comment

In “Nemesis” Chalmers Johnson observed that since “1947, while we have used our military power for political and military gain in a long list of countries, in no instance has democratic government come about as a result.” 

“Liberation” and “spreading democracy” are the traditional linguistic cover designed to hide the venality behind imperial conquest.  The image of the U.S. as a benevolent world savior which engages in “nation-building” is a convenient myth that has no bearing on the reality of the corporate global project.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






                        Number of characters remaining: 4000

Are you a human? Retype the word you see here.

     

Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox


 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2012 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.