![]() |
![]() |
||
|
Sweeping Blackwater Under the RugPosted on Dec 9, 2008The federal manslaughter indictment of five Blackwater Worldwide security guards for the horrific massacre of more than a dozen Iraqi civilians in Baghdad may look like an exercise in accountability, but it’s probably the exact opposite—a whitewash that absolves the governmental and corporate officials who should bear ultimate responsibility. If what Justice Department prosecutors allege is true, the five guards—Donald Ball, Dustin Heard, Evan Liberty, Nick Slatten and Paul Slough—should have to answer for what they did on Sept. 16, 2007. The men, working under Blackwater’s contract to protect State Department personnel in Iraq, are charged with spraying a busy intersection with machine-gun fire and grenades, killing at least 14 unarmed civilians and wounding 20 others. One man, prosecutors said Monday, was shot in the chest with his hands raised in submission. The indictment, charging voluntary manslaughter and weapons violations, demonstrates that those who engage “in unprovoked attacks will be held accountable,” Assistant Attorney General Patrick Rowan claimed. But it demonstrates nothing of the sort. As with the torture and humiliation of detainees at the Abu Ghraib prison, our government is deflecting all scrutiny from the corporate higher-ups who employed the guards—to say nothing of the policymakers whose decisions made the shootings possible, if not inevitable. Prosecutors did not file charges against the North Carolina-based Blackwater firm—the biggest U.S. security contractor in Iraq—or any of the company’s executives. The whole tragic incident is being blamed on the guards who, prosecutors say, made Baghdad’s Nisoor Square a virtual free-fire zone. Advertisement There is a huge difference between self-defense and the kind of indiscriminate fusillade that the Blackwater team allegedly unleashed. Proper training and supervision—which was the Blackwater firm’s responsibility—would have made it more likely for the guards to make the right split-second decisions amid the chaos of Nisoor Square. Rather than give Blackwater a free pass, the Justice Department ought to investigate the preparation these men were given before being sent onto Baghdad’s dangerous streets. Blackwater no doubt has rules and regulations about when and where its people can discharge their weapons. But were those rules enforced? Did the guards who were indicted Monday have any reason to believe they would be punished for their rampage? Or were the shootings considered acceptable inside the Blackwater bunker? Company executives should have to answer these and other questions—under oath. But a real attempt to establish blame for this massacre should go beyond Blackwater. It was the Bush administration that decided to police the occupation of Iraq largely with private rather than regular troops. There are an estimated 30,000 security “contractors” in Iraq, many of them there to protect U.S. State Department personnel. The presence of these heavily armed private soldiers has become a sore point between the U.S. and Iraqi governments. Until now, the mercenaries—they object to that label, but it fits—have been immune from prosecution by the Iraqi courts for any alleged crimes. This will change on Jan. 1, when the new U.S.-Iraqi security pact places them under the jurisdiction of Iraqi law. Blackwater and other firms likely will have a harder time retaining and recruiting personnel, given the prospect of spending time in an Iraqi prison. Yet it is presumed that more private soldiers will be needed, rather than fewer, as the United States reduces troop levels. Barack Obama has criticized the Bush administration’s decision to outsource so many essentially military tasks in Iraq and elsewhere. The officials who made that decision, however, are not being held accountable—not yet, at least. We deserve, at a minimum, a thorough investigation of what security contractors have done in the name of the United States. Putting national security in the hands of private companies and private soldiers was bad practice from the start, and incidents such as what happened at Nisoor Square are the foreseeable result. The five Blackwater guards may have fired the weapons, but they were locked and loaded in Washington. Eugene Robinson’s e-mail address is eugenerobinson(at)washpost.com. © 2008, Washington Post Writers Group Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By dihey, December 11, 2008 at 7:37 pm #
Robinson: “Barack Obama has criticized the Bush administration’s decision to outsource so many essentially military tasks in Iraq and elsewhere”.
Well, Barack Obama has voted funds for “the Bush administration’s decision to outsource so many essentially military tasks in Iraq and elsewhere” several times and he has never pressed in the Senate for legislation to stop or even reverse the outsourcing. He does not demand that the “outsorcers” now leave Iraq pronto but promises their protection by a residual force after 16 months of scam-withdrawal. What hypocrisy!
Moreover, all experts have agreed that the “outsourcing” was a consequence of too few troops in Iraq. When has Senator Obama pressed for more troops and fewer “outsorcers”? Never. This is Monday-morning quarterbacking supported by the “forgive-all” Mr. Robinson.
Report thisBy Blackspeare, December 11, 2008 at 5:05 pm #
There’s a psychological aspect to “Blackwater” that should be acknowledged. It is known that soldiers, under hard fighting conditions, can become hooked on the rush of combat. This results in a state of mind that makes people rush to volunteer for additional tours of duty. Career military folks may do it for medals, extra money, or the sheer thrill rush of danger all under the guise of “serving my country” or “things to finish over there” or “don’t want those people to die in vain”. For soldiers of fortune, which Blackwater personnel are, combat is catnip for them. When the contract ends many of them will develop PTSD, and will eventually go into depression followed by rage and then watch out.
Report thisBy Grousefeather, December 10, 2008 at 1:04 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I’ll bet anything that these guys will end up on a police force somewhere.
Report thisBy Big B, December 9, 2008 at 10:53 pm #
This has been swept so far under the rug that there’s a hump causing the couch to tip. Barry and the boys will do nothing about our mercs because they are a part of his master plan for Iraq. They will be the soldiers left in place while Barry claims he pulled the regular army out, as promised.
Mercs are here to stay! Heck just wait for the shit to really hit the fan here in the good ol’ USA. As cities and small towns tax bases deteriorate, and federal aid dries up, police will be the first major expense to go. We see this happening already all over the nation. The thing is that while the poor urban and rural areas will do without, private gated communities have popped up around the US that have hired their own private police to work the gate, keep the rif-raf out, and tell the parents what time their kids came home. All they need now is a moat to keep the serfs honest, and Feudal america will be reborn!
Yessiree, mercs are here to stay!(in one form or another) well, at least for those who can afford them.
Report thisBy msgmi, December 9, 2008 at 8:21 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Another dog & pony show prosecution targeting individuals and not the corporate chain of command which gets a selective pass.
Report thisBy Blackspeare, December 9, 2008 at 7:14 pm #
I rarely agree with Mr. Robinson’s opinions, but this time he is probably correct. What we are about to witness is judicial theatrics——a trial with a pre-conceived verdict to appease whomever. And what’s funny it will fit well into the annals of history——oh, that’s right the victors always write the history.
Report thisBy felicity, December 9, 2008 at 3:02 pm #
The handwriting was on the wall way back when Bremer issued his ‘100 orders’ one of which grants foreign contractors, including private security firms, full immunity from Iraq’s laws. Even if they, say, kill someone or cause an environmental disaster, the injured party cannot turn to the Iraqi legal system. Rather, the charges must be brought to US courts. The recent verdict in the Blackwater case is a blatant example of why this order was established early on.
There were/are 100,000 contractors in Iraq, 20,000 military contractors. One firm alone has a $300 million contract. What’s been a tragedy for thousands has been an obvious financial boon for Bush & Co. The soldier in the field, in the name of we-can’t-afford-it, is denied proper body armor, denied well-armored vehicles while Bush & Co. reap billions.
Report thisBy mendez, December 9, 2008 at 1:53 pm #
The questions that need to be asked, probably not until Bush leaves office, focus on those who gave the orders first, then those who pulled the triggers. Terror, is our most important product here in the good ol’ US of A to borrow an old advertising line. Since WWII, we have owned the title of topgun terrorist, regardless of what is written. Punchlines like using ‘overwhelming force’ are thrown around like free chocolates, but it is clear these goons got their orders from someone? Having said that, crimes of looking the other way should be considered if they can’t get testimony on who gave the orders. These were the ‘shock and awe’ guys who were told, no doubt, they would set the fear levels for ordinary citizens. They will tell you that scenes like this were necessary to protect our poor little troops. Shocker!
Report thisBy Jim Yell, December 9, 2008 at 12:00 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I agree completely with this article. Contracts with private owned companies have not brought down prices and costs, they have only allowed more theft of public money and no way to control what is done in the name of the government and the people.
Private armies are the first step into the chaos of the Wiemar Republic. Get the ones who where in charge and created this mess. Do not allow Bush/Cheney criminals to get away with this. It isn’t too late to impeach both of them.
Report thisBy KDelphi, December 9, 2008 at 11:45 am #
Manslaughter’s ass…youve got to be kiding me..
Report thisBy hippy pam, December 9, 2008 at 11:10 am #
These are “ole bullshits” HAND PICKED MERCS….We sure as hell DO NOT WANT THEM ON AMERICAN SOIL….WE need to be VERY AFRAID when these religion based killers[no different than al-quaida]get back on AMERICAN SOIL…This IS “ole bullshits” HAND PICKED ARMY OF OCCUPATION….Waiting to strike….So “ole bullshit” can KEEP POWER….
Report this