|
|||
|
Obama’s E-TeamPosted on Nov 24, 2008President-elect Barack Obama has now made three things clear about his plans to bring the economy back: He wants his actions to be big and bold. He sees economic recovery as intimately linked with economic and social reform. And he is bringing in a gifted brain trust to get the job done. Just three weeks after Election Day, Obama has already expanded his authority by seizing on “an economic crisis of historic proportions,” as he described it on Monday, to call for a stimulus package that will dwarf in size anything ever attempted by the federal government. But Obama is also using the crisis to make the case for larger structural reforms in health care, energy and education—“to lay the groundwork for long-term, sustained economic growth,” as he put it. Obama clearly views the economic downturn not as an impediment to the broadly progressive program he outlined during the campaign but as an opportunity for a round of unprecedented social legislation. “He feels very strongly that this is not just a short-term fix but a long-term retooling of the American economy,” said one of Obama’s closest advisers. “Obama has a holistic view of the economy. Health care is going to be part of it,” the lieutenant told me, and so will green energy investments, education reform and a new approach to regulating financial markets. Obama further underscored his decision to tether social and economic policy by linking his announcement of Melody Barnes as the director of the White House Domestic Policy Council to the unveiling of his economic team. Advertisement Some who know Summers, a man with a large personality, were surprised that he would take the job as inside-the-White-House economic adviser and accept the appointment of Geithner, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, as treasury secretary. But Obama’s aides are making clear that Summers is being assigned a large role in shaping the administration’s overall economic policy, and his White House post will free him from the day-to-day responsibilities of running the Treasury Department—duties well suited for Geithner, widely seen as a good manager and also as an economic diplomat likely to broker international cooperation in stemming the downturn. The fact that Summers and Geithner have a long history of working together should ease potential conflicts. The senior Obama adviser said the president-elect benefited from Summers’ desire to be at the center of the action during the greatest economic crisis since the Great Depression. “If ever there was a time to want to be involved, it’s now,” said the adviser, who added that Obama, in turn, sees Summers as “brilliant.” Obama got to know Geithner “during the final weeks of the campaign,” said the senior Obama aide, and the two hit it off immediately. Like Obama, Geithner had partly grown up abroad, and this gave the two an immediate connection. It led to “an ease in conversation” and the two discovered they “also share a common temperament,” including a calm demeanor and a curiosity about the thinking of others. “When Obama emerged from the first meeting, he was very effusive,” said the senior aide. “He said, ‘I feel good about him as a person, he inspires confidence.’ ” Geithner did not campaign for the job, which only sent his stock higher in the Obama circle. “He suggested that others might be better, that he might be more useful where he is,” said the Obama lieutenant. “That was impressive as well.” Obama’s selection of a team of highly skilled pragmatists has already been described as a move to the political center, but Obama advisers and longtime acquaintances say that this is a misreading of the incoming president and his approach. They describe it as combining a practicality about means with an overriding concern about the corrosive effects of growing economic inequalities. Aides say that Obama was drawn to Summers in part because the former Harvard president shares the president-elect’s passion for a more equitable distribution of economic benefits. Obama was impressed during campaign policy discussions that Summers would often pull the conversation away from general talk about economic growth to a concern with the living standards of families with average incomes. Washington often divides the Democratic policy world between progressives and pragmatists. With Obama, as Monday’s news conference showed, it will have to become accustomed to a president who is both. CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By GrammaConcept, November 27, 2008 at 1:44 pm Link to this comment
Excellent article…...
The Mystery Play begins..
Report thisBy MAR, November 26, 2008 at 7:08 pm Link to this comment
This is more like it, a much better and cleareer view than Robert Scheer’s piece.
Report thisBy Shift, November 25, 2008 at 9:51 pm Link to this comment
Being responsible for ourselves, at the local level, is of more importance to the average American than is Washington. The process of building down to a more rational and sustaining life takes time. I am increasingly prepared for a sustained downturn only after four years of continuous effort and planning. Then if Washington does come through with a few assists it eases the burden of creative survival.
Report thisBy Maani, November 25, 2008 at 5:56 pm Link to this comment
Dave:
I make my assertion by having studied the NWO in depth for other two decades, particularly the “big six” (BG, TC, CFR, COR, RIIA, TCG). Whatever CFR’s original aims were, it has moved decidedly to the left over the past five to ten years. (I’m not suggesting that it is “progressive” in any real sense, only that it has moved quite a bit toward the center from its initial conservative-right leanings.) This is reflected (among other places) in its “house instrument,” a magazine called Foreign Affairs, which I read cover to cover each issue.
In actuality, BG remains the most overall “powerful” of the NWO groups. And the ultra-secretive RIIA (and only slightly less secretive COR) are rarely even considered. TC also remains a major player, and I am more concerned about the TC elements that remain in DC than I am the CFRs, who no longer scare me…LOL.
Peace.
Report thisBy Dave in Big Pine, November 25, 2008 at 5:36 pm Link to this comment
Maani
jolie is a member of CFR like Bush is President. In name only, and totally irrelevent.
this guy is controlled by the Rothchilds and Rockefellers and the other international bankers.
those who control the money supply, control everything. no?
the CFR is very relevent, as are the other two. what do base your assertion on? these groups are populated by the same people by and large. All advocate the same end of nationalism and the rise of the NWO.
Report thisBy Maani, November 25, 2008 at 4:38 pm Link to this comment
troublesum:
That is a very astute observation, concisely put. Bravo.
Dave:
Virtually everyone in government is a member of CFR. But so is Angelina Jolie. So? Being a member of CFR has all but lost its significance. However, watch for members of TC and BG!
Peace.
Report thisBy Spiritgirl, November 25, 2008 at 3:52 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
“Economist Dean Baker said that Barack Obama putting these people who helped create the crisis in charge of fixing it is like putting Osama bin Laden in charge of the war on terror.”
Just a tip bin Laden is in charge! He’s been aided and abetted by BushCo. all of these years!
Report thisBy coloradokarl, November 25, 2008 at 2:04 pm Link to this comment
Keep your friends close, keep your enemies closer? Obama’s smart, we made the Bet, let’s ROLE THE DICE !!
Report thisBy Dave in Big Pine, November 25, 2008 at 1:13 pm Link to this comment
the new treasury sec. is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.
that’s all you need to know.
game over.
Report thisBy davidperi, November 25, 2008 at 11:27 am Link to this comment
OUCH…listen to http://www.democracynow.org as Naomi Klein, Robert Kuttner and Michael Hudson discuss and dissect Obama´s economic & stimulus plan.
Report thisBy Blackspeare, November 25, 2008 at 8:53 am Link to this comment
An interesting observation: Way before the election I asked a black friend how he felt about BHO. His reply was interesting. He said only during a time of uncertainty, economic woes, and a disliked president could a minority individual even be considered, which had a grain of truth. But he went on to say that maybe this wasn’t the time for a Black president because some things are beyond the control of the administration and if the economy and international policies cannot be rectified in four years that person will take the blame and be finished!
Report thisBy troublesum, November 25, 2008 at 8:25 am Link to this comment
The operative word is no longer “change.” “Approach” is now what he’s all about.
Report thisBy P. T., November 25, 2008 at 8:17 am Link to this comment
Economist Dean Baker said that Barack Obama putting these people who helped create the crisis in charge of fixing it is like putting Osama bin Laden in charge of the war on terror.
Report this