![]() |
|
||
|
Tuning Out the Braindead MegaphonePosted on Nov 20, 2008By David Sirota If you’re having trouble remembering what the recent election was all about, rest easy: You’re probably not going senile – you’re likely experiencing the momentary effects of brainwashing. For weeks, your television, newspaper and radio have been telling you America is a “center-right nation” that elected Barack Obama to crush his fellow “socialist” hippies, discard the agenda he campaigned on, and meet the policy demands of electorally humiliated Republicans. This is the usual post-election nonsense from the Braindead Megaphone, as author George Saunders famously calls our political and media noise machine. When George W. Bush wins by 3 million votes, the megaphone blares announcements about a conservative mandate that Democrats must respect. When Obama wins by twice as much, the same megaphone roars about Democrats having no mandate to do anything other than appease conservatives. It’s confusing, isn’t it? We hazily recall backing Obama and his progressive platform. Yet, the megaphone’s re-educative shock treatment aims to wipe away that memory and conjure eternal conservatism from our spotless minds. Luckily, we have polling to maintain our sanity. Advertisement Sensing the enormity of these numbers, Obama seems ready to back a “big bang” of far-reaching initiatives. “We can’t afford to wait on moving forward on the key priorities that I identified during the campaign,” he said in his first radio address as president-elect. Based on advertisements, Obama identified no more important priority than guaranteeing health care for all citizens. As the Campaign Media Analysis Group reported, he devoted more than two-thirds of his total television budget to ads that included health care themes. Consequently, a Pew poll found 77 percent of Americans said health care would be a decisive concern in their presidential vote. The moral case for universal health care is obvious. In the world’s richest country—a country that builds lavish sports stadiums and showers Wall Street with trillion-dollar bailouts—18,000 people die each year because they lack health insurance. We permit this annual massacre while our wasteful system exacerbates our debt and saps our economic competitiveness by forcing us to spend more money per capita on health care than any other nation. That said, if morality alone prompted solutions, this problem would have been addressed long ago. Overcoming inertia on such a thorny issue requires budget pressure—which Obama definitely faces. While some claim the deficit should preclude bold health care legislation, it’s the other way around. The Congressional Budget Office says America’s fiscal gap is “driven primarily by rising health care costs,” meaning a fix is an imperative. “People ask whether (Obama) has the fiscal breathing room to push health care reform,” economist Jared Bernstein told The Washington Post. “He doesn’t have the fiscal breathing room not to do health care reform.” Additionally, as with everything in Washington, a political motive is needed for action – and even conservatives acknowledge Democrats have such a motive when it comes to health care. Fifteen years ago, Republican strategist William Kristol warned that the Clinton administration’s universal health care proposals represented “a serious political threat to the Republican Party” because, if passed, they “will revive the reputation” of Democrats as “the generous protector of middle-class interests.” As we all remember, Democrats failed to capitalize on the health care opportunity. But Kristol’s prophecy was correct then, as it is now. With huge Democratic majorities in Congress come 2009, only the Braindead Megaphone is in Obama’s way. David Sirota is a bestselling author whose newest book is “The Uprising.” He is a fellow at the Campaign for America’s Future and a board member of the Progressive States Network—both nonpartisan organizations. His blog is at www.credoaction.com/sirota. © 2008 Creators Syndicate Inc. Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By toddboyle, November 23, 2008 at 10:46 pm #
The unruly gaggle of permanent lobbyists/politicians in Washington DC sell to the American people *whatever* sells. WHATEVER.
Their rhetoric is a roadmap to whatever is the *greatest* most spectacular vulnerability or unplumbed depth Americans are still unware of, unable to face, unable to rationally consider. Prominantly among these vast rivers of energy, more potent, more useful than oil or coal—are the ignoramuses among the human population….. Who pound their chests, for America.
Report thisBy samosamo, November 23, 2008 at 5:48 pm #
By KDelphi, November 23 at 12:02 pm
‘One thing we could do in this country is to stop being so selfish. Well, no i guess it seems that we cant.’
Absolutely, this is just one of the objectives of the msm mind control, all other peoples are second rate to us and our hubris, supported by msm marketing and advertizing for the corporate interests, keeps us keeps us this way. The threads and tangles of the corporate media run deep and to untangle them would take education and the information the msm does not provide to see things clearly. Nope, no selfishlessness here.
Report thisBy KDelphi, November 23, 2008 at 5:02 pm #
Health care is only a small issue, if you , and the people you care about, either do not need it, or, already have it.
InTheKnow—People get old. People have accidents. People have genetic predispositions. People in other countries, that provide heatlh care, live longer and happier lives. No one will make you go to get health care. Youre just lucky. I know people who have lead exemplary lives, “health wise”, no smoking, drinking, exercising—one I am thinking of died of brain cancer anyway. I could name you many more.
Be careful, or you will look like you are falling for the MSM megaphone too.
One thing we could do in this country is to stop being so selfish. Well, no i guess it seems that we cant.
Of course we have to stop the “war(s)” to afford anything—even to survive, as a country..but I dont think anybody even thinks we will have anyone seriously working on that anymore.If we are to stop the “war on terror”—it will take alot more than “voting”..hell, we cant even get the School of the Americas closed! And Blackwater opens new training sites every week..
I have certainly thought of just “dying” rather than bothering , anymore, also. But, make sure it works! If it does not, you can be charged. Seriously. It is against the law to try to commit suicide.
If we make it a tax issue—may be we could, at least, get that law changed.That is something everyone seem to care about—taxes. Tax rebates. Stimulus pkgs…
Report thisBy InTheKnow, November 23, 2008 at 7:24 am #
Everyday people complain and worry about the cost of healthcare in this country. Most people would only need to see a doctor once per year for a routine physical if they changed their lifestyle(s). Preventive medicine is a healthy lifestyle and is much more effective than an allopathic doctor armed with a prescription pad and scalpel.
Report thisAs for the differences between the two political parties: it’s not much. Experienced voters should know this. Also, campaign promises are often made with the understanding that the legislative branch will modify or nullify any promised changed.
By samosamo, November 23, 2008 at 2:15 am #
I had no illusions about this past election. I felt that voting as many republicans as possible out of office was the top priority. The problem with that is they would have to be replaced by democrats where the similarity is about the same as a human to a chimpanzee, 95 to 98.5%.
“It has long been held that we share 98.5 per cent of our genetic material with our closest relatives. That now appears to be wrong. In fact, we share less than 95 per cent of our genetic material, a three-fold increase in the variation between us and chimps”.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2833-humanchimp-dna-difference-trebled.html
or
“Researchers already know that humans and chimpanzees share about 98 percent of the same genes. But rather than searching for mutations, Redon’s team looked at a relatively unstudied phenomenon known as copy number variation, or CNV, in which genes are redundantly duplicated”.
http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/11/exploring-the-g.html
You can decide which party represents which.
Report thisHaving taken control, the democrats have not shown much promise for me for the kind of changes we need. Been a lot of petty grabs for rights and things for the suffering masses and there are the beginnings of the appointments that are not making me feel too good about the next term of congress and the president. Except for the dread I feel of pelosi and reid retaining their jobs, I will try to give 100 days to hold on to my hopes for the changes needed which by then, both congress and the president should have begun to establish a plan and system for what they will do to this country. But I really wish there were lot more 3rd party people elected and independents like bernie sanders of Vermont.
But the biggest issues will tell me pretty quick as to how this ‘new’ government will play out and I hope that I won’t be crying at the end of 100 days or even sooner.
By optipessi mist, November 22, 2008 at 10:30 pm #
By toddboyle, November 22 at 5:04 pm #
The ordinary person can be forgiven for thinking that the extreme medical services that the rich are buying for themselves, might be available to all of us. That’s as ludicrous as wanting your own private jet—there aren’t going to be 300 million private jets. We don’t even *want* that level of medical services. It implies turning over a large percentage of your lifetime earnings to the (ridiculously overpaid) doctors and (ridiculously expensive) hospitals. I have gone my whole life NEVER paying for health insurance and I have had a few rough patches. Im 56 and when I eventually face a big medical crisis I will beg, scream, cry, apply for aid… all the while knowing, it’s unlikely and I never lifted a finger or paid one dollar to support it—- so—I fully expect, when I get cancer or whatever—I will die. And that’s a bargain that has given me a whole life of freedom- freedom from work. I have only really workd a few brief intervals in my life, 3 or 4 years, now and then. Life is to be lived. not to spend in the harness.
___________________________________________________
Maynard is that you Maynard G. Crabbs from the Dobie Gillis TV show. Ok, is it you Gilligan from Giligan’s Island. How’s the Skipper, the Professor, Thurston Howell III and his wife luvy. How about Gindger and Marieanne. How’s that crazy Southamerican dictator that got stranded on the island. You know the one that told you, “...the people, promise them dis, dat and de oder ting…” (tanslation: Promise them, this, that, and the other thing.)LOL
Report thisBy toddboyle, November 22, 2008 at 10:04 pm #
The ordinary person can be forgiven for thinking that the extreme medical services that the rich are buying for themselves, might be available to all of us. That’s as ludicrous as wanting your own private jet—there aren’t going to be 300 million private jets. We don’t even *want* that level of medical services. It implies turning over a large percentage of your lifetime earnings to the (ridiculously overpaid) doctors and (ridiculously expensive) hospitals. I have gone my whole life NEVER paying for health insurance and I have had a few rough patches. Im 56 and when I eventually face a big medical crisis I will beg, scream, cry, apply for aid… all the while knowing, it’s unlikely and I never lifted a finger or paid one dollar to support it—- so—I fully expect, when I get cancer or whatever—I will die. And that’s a bargain that has given me a whole life of freedom- freedom from work. I have only really workd a few brief intervals in my life, 3 or 4 years, now and then. Life is to be lived. not to spend in the harness.
Report thisBy more4life, November 22, 2008 at 5:32 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
I can’t, for the life of me, understand how people can be so blind. Both of the major parties are greatly flawed. They both have been striving for a socialist country that puts government in total control of every aspect of your life and mine. The only difference has been that the republicans were doing it at a slower rate until George Bush took office. We now have the perfect environment for socialism to fully bloom.
Watch closely, if you dare. Tune out the sweet talk and watch the results unfold.
Report thisBy leilah, November 21, 2008 at 10:35 pm #
I liked Senator Webb’s interjection when an intervier announced him as a conservative Democrat. He said, “First, of all let me correct something you said. I am not a conservative Democrat.” The interviewer continued as if he were deaf.
Report thisNoam Chomsky gave a talk where he listd the poll numbers of surveys given to the Amerrican people. We are overwhelmingly liberal. I think the lowest per cent margin was would we pay more in taxes for better health insurance, 70% for to 30% against. The ranges in the other questions were in the 80% range.
By toddboyle, November 21, 2008 at 8:52 pm #
All the wars since at least WW2 have NOT been self defense. The U.S. has killed millions of innocent people in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq. These people never attacked America. 90% of the people killed, are noncombatants. Children, elderly, bystanders. The US congress and pres. and the US military are institutions out of control. They are in an illegal status, violating laws and treaties NOT defending us.
Politicians are pandering to, and exploiting, the ignorance and the passions of the 300 million Americans. It is up to ALL OF US, to reach and teach, these ignoramuses, these neanderthals, who elect people to wage war against our fellow humans around the world.
The military should be used ONLY to defend the territory that is our jurisdiction.
Report thisBy optipessi mist, November 21, 2008 at 3:28 pm #
Does anybody here remember the Republicans and Newt Ginrich the driving force with the Contract with America. A written document with text specifying 10 pieces of legislation. It was signed by all but two of the Republican members of the House and all of the Party’s non-incumbent Republican Congressional candidates. Most of the bills died in the Senate.
What a surprise.
To begin with most voters do not know contract law.
So they missed the fact that Contract with America was not worth the paper it was written.
First the matters contracted for cannot be illegal or inequitable. America is ok so far.
There are a few steps in between but nothing that would not make the contract not legally binding.
Next is the contracting parties. We are ok on the Congressmen’s side. But oops America is not a legal entity that would be recognized by a court of competent jurisdiction. It would have been necessary to incorporate America to make it America, Inc. and then the Contract with America could have been signed by its duly appointed officer(s). Now we are ok again regarding parties to the contract.
I could go on but you get the idea.
Where is the legally binding written agreement with Barack Obama and Congress?
I think there is more than a braindead megaphone involved here.
Report thisBy john doraemi, November 21, 2008 at 3:20 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
This ‘conservative vs. liberal’ blather ignores how both parties function as criminal enterprises. The congress is a protection racket, first and foremost. It’s a profit center secondarily. But, the main function of both parties is to protect criminal executive branch monsters so they can avoid accountability and the empire can roll on in standard fashion (war, intimidation, covert atrocities, hegemony). This is the historical reality, which any sentient writer can quickly research.
That reality never makes it into these discussions about the “conservatives” and the “liberals.”
The word that needs to be used is “criminals.”
How can you expect the people to rise up and demand justice, if you never call out the criminal nature of the system? Both parties included?
This pulled-punch journalism serves to keep the masses distracted. And that’s about it.
http://crimesofthestate.blogspot.com/
Report thisBy Folktruther, November 21, 2008 at 2:51 pm #
Health care is by no means the most important issue; it is a red herring to divert attention from the economy, war, and the develooping police state. It is of course essential, but it is being touted by establishment truthers to maintain Obama’s progressive credentials as he serves his corporate masters.
In any case, Obama is unlikely to deliver on it. Or any progressive plank that he campaigned on.
Report thisBy RdV, November 21, 2008 at 2:47 pm #
Sirota must’ve written this before Obama was devoured by the Clinton regime.
Report thisBy GW=MCHammered, November 21, 2008 at 11:52 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
Malignant health care underpins most crisis in America from individuals to families, business and the economy.
“The U.S. spends twice as much as other industrialized nations on health care, $7,129 per capita. Yet our system performs poorly in comparison and still leaves 47 million without health coverage and millions more inadequately covered.”
Physicians for a National Health Program
Report thishttp://www.pnhp.org
By Jeremy Keith Hammond, November 21, 2008 at 11:14 am #
Need funds for a universal health care system that saves lives? How about end the wars abroad that destroy lives and livelihoods? Maybe close the hundreds of bases in over 100 countries around the world. Do we really need to occupy the planet? Nope.
Creation before destruction.
Report thisLife before death.