Top Leaderboard, Site wide
Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines
March 24, 2017 Disclaimer: Please read.

Statements and opinions expressed in articles are those of the authors, not Truthdig. Truthdig takes no responsibility for such statements or opinions.

Truthdig Bazaar
Conservation Refugees

Conservation Refugees

Mark Dowie

more items

Email this item Print this item

Change We Can Bank On

Posted on Nov 18, 2008
Thomson, Paulson and Rubin
AP photo / J. Scott Applewhite

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, center, addresses a gathering of corporate CEOs at an economic conference sponsored by The Wall Street Journal in Washington, D.C., on Monday. With him is Robert Thomson, left, editor in chief of Dow Jones & Co., and former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin.

By Robert Scheer

This is not change we can believe in. Not if Robert Rubin or his protégé, Lawrence Summers, get to call the shots on the economy in President-elect Barack Obama’s incoming administration. Both Clinton-era treasury secretaries deserve a great deal of the blame for the radical deregulation of the financial industry that has derailed the world economy. They both should, along with former Federal Reserve chief Alan Greenspan, perform rites of contrition and be kept at a safe distance from the leadership of our nation.

Yet Rubin and Summers are highly visible in the Obama transition team, with Summers widely touted as Obama’s pick for secretary of the treasury. New York Federal Reserve President Timothy Geithner, who also worked in the Treasury Department under Rubin and Summers, is the other leading candidate. But it was Summers who most vehemently pushed for congressional passage of that drastic deregulation measure, the Financial Services Modernization Act, which eliminated the New Deal barriers against mergers of commercial and investment banks as well as insurance companies and stockbrokers. Standing at his side as President Bill Clinton signed the legislation, Summers heralded it as “a major step forward to the 21st century”—and what a wonderful century it’s proving to be.

It was also Summers who worked in cahoots with Enron and banking lobbyists, and who backed Republican Sen. Phil Gramm’s Commodity Futures Modernization Act, which banned any effective government regulation of the newly unleashed derivatives market. The result was not only a temporary boon to Enron, which soon collapsed under its unbridled greed, but also to the entire Wall Street financial community.

The only opposition from within the Clinton administration came from Brooksley E. Born who, as head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, dared defy Summers and Rubin, as well as Greenspan. In frequent appearances before Congress, she warned that the burgeoning derivatives trading “threatens our economy without any federal agency knowing about it.” In reward for her prescience, Born, a highly regarded legal expert on derivatives, was treated to scornful attacks from the old boys’ network, led (again) by Rubin, Greenspan and Summers, who questioned her competency and insisted it was she who threatened the stability of the market.

That sexism, as well as stupidity and greed, might have played a role in the dismissal of Born’s concerns has been raised by some of Summers’ critics, who were still smarting even after his subsequent forced departure from Harvard University after disparaging women’s innate ability to grasp mathematics and science. “It was Larry Summers who called her up and screamed at her,” Amy Siskind, co-founder of the New Agenda, a women’s rights group that grew out of the Hillary Rodham Clinton presidential campaign, told the Boston Globe to support her view that Summers is a “known misogynist.”

Whatever the motives, Born was painfully right in her warnings and Summers was totally wrong in overseeing the passage of legislation that summarily prevented any government regulation of the debt instruments that have proved so disastrous. I don’t know if Born, now retired at 68, would be interested in the treasury secretary position, but she is certainly far more qualified than the other candidates under consideration.

Barring that possibility, why not go with Sheila Bair, the chair of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, who has distinguished herself by proposing a sterling alternative example of how to deal with the banking collapse? It is Bair who has most forcefully advanced the goal, advocated by Obama in his recent “60 Minutes” interview, of putting homeowners before banks. Under her leadership, the FDIC has made sure that the insured banks, which it supervises and occasionally takes over, act to prevent foreclosures rather than using government handouts to finance new bank mergers.

On Tuesday, House Democrats led by Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass, accused Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson of betraying congressional language authorizing the $700 billion bailout that specifically called for “mortgage foreclosure diminution.” Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., charged, “We’re basically funding mergers and acquisitions, not lending.” On Friday, Bair introduced a proposal to allocate $24.4 billion of the bailout specifically to modify loans to prevent 1.5 million foreclosures, but was opposed by Paulson.

Because Geithner and Summers support Paulson’s approach, Obama should reject them and pick Bair to give us the kind of change he’s been promising.

Robert Scheer is the author of a new book, “The Pornography of Power: How Defense Hawks Hijacked 9/11 and Weakened America.”


Square, Site wide

New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

Join the conversation

Load Comments

By coloradokarl, November 19, 2008 at 7:28 am Link to this comment

As this plays out, there are still many Questions that will be answered in the coming weeks and months. Was Obama “Groomed” from from the time of his youth (as Bill Clinton obviously was) for this leadership position? Where do Obama’s true loyalties reside?  Obama is very smart, The One World Order folks are smart also but lack Compassion or ANY of the higher Human emotions, they will NEVER be Very Smart. Did Obama “Get the message” when the emergency chute opened in the rear of his plane? ( that one got swept under the rug fast).
Does he want to be a chapter in the History books or a whole shelf in the History isle ?  Freedom from the Fear of Perilous Journeys Invites Shangri-La

Report this
Purple Girl's avatar

By Purple Girl, November 19, 2008 at 7:03 am Link to this comment

Who dares claim they could not foresee the problems with Trickle Down, or that there was a ‘flaw’ in their logic…BULLSHIT. One need only open a history book to see how ‘Trickle Down’ has caused the Ruin of many old empires.
How could they have missed the connection between the basic tennents of ‘Trickle Down’ and that of Feudalism. THEY DIDN’T!
Really how can a Market be Free if the resources are retained and hoarded at the top. ‘Trickle Down’ was the reinstatement of the same Socio economic situation our Founding Fathers escaped and fought Against for Our Independence.
How vast is the disparity now between Upper and middle class incomes. Who are they throwing money at from that 700 billion- not the middle class, but the ‘Nobles’.Who are they blaming for the Foreclosures…Those who were suckered by the upper echelons who devised these Bait & Switch snake oil home loans.It is not the Mcdonald’s worker who bought a 50,000 mobile home who has caused this, it’s the ‘Investors’ who bought homes on ‘Interest Only’ payment and were ‘flipping’ them when the Bubble burst.Frankly I have no problem bailing out the Single Homeowner who was lured into buying a home the Lenders KNEW they could not afford. But would Love to see these ‘Flippers’ go down in flames. Playing with fire Kiddos, you deserve to get Burned.
As for those who attempted to create a Feudalistic Caste system here, HANG THEM for their Treason which was blatantly UNAMERICAN to beging with. Apparently any 5th grader could have told Greenspan et al their economic stratedgy went against everything the country was founded on and Would cause the economy to collapse because of the weight (and Greed) of the ‘Upper strata’.
Forethought and Malice.Who do these people REALLY work for ..the Saudi’s, The Chinese…They sure do Not work for US!Proof’s in the Puddin’

Report this

By blog dog, November 19, 2008 at 3:02 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Bull’s Eye, Mr. Scheer! But you’re still just shy of dead center: the Obama Presidency is orchestrated Left Cover for the steady advance of the New World Oligarchy - Brzezinski directing from deep within the wings.

Cheney and Bush got the hook probably a year ago, after the Barksdale Nuke episode - the Cheney faction’s last desperate grasp at launching on Iran. Since then, orders have been coming down from the Principals Committee. The Neocons couldn’t resist their Nietzchien impulses and totally blew it; now nothing’s left to chance.

Obama knows his script: no progressives take the stage. But, should he get a wild hair and try to actually play Der Scwarze Kennedy, he’d be wise to take the advice of the first aid to urge that he reflect on the fate of Der Weiße Kennedy.

Report this

Page 2 of 2 pages  <  1 2

Right Top, Site wide - Care2
Right 3, Site wide - Exposure Dynamics
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
Right Internal Skyscraper, Site wide

Like Truthdig on Facebook