|
|
May 22, 2013
|
|
Knowing When to Walk AwayPosted on Nov 14, 2008By David Sirota It wouldn’t be the George W. Bush we all know if our shamed president didn’t spend his remaining White House days in a final fit of polarization. That’s what Bush’s moves this week are clearly about: dividing—not uniting. The New York Times reported that during his first meeting with Barack Obama, the outgoing president suggested he might support Democrats’ economic stimulus package and aid to struggling automakers if party leaders “drop their opposition to a free-trade agreement with Colombia.” Although Bush later denied suggesting an overt quid pro quo, one was obviously implied. Strange behavior? Yes and no. Bush is the Texas Hold ‘Em addict who raised on the largest tax cuts in contemporary history, re-raised on two wars and went all-in with an attempt to privatize Social Security. So yes, from a brinkmanship standpoint, it seems bizarre that in exchange for a massive legislative effort to right the entire economy, the cowboy president may insist on a tiny trade deal that—at best—promises a boost of “less than seven-hundredths of one percent to U.S. gross domestic product,” according to the Brookings Institution. But, then, Bush is the protégé of Karl Rove and the son of George H.W. Bush. So no, his Colombia demand isn’t weird at all—nor is it as small a wager as it appears. Advertisement Bush wants to replicate this Three Card Monte—and the Colombia trade pact is his ace in the hole. The deal would reward a right-wing Colombian regime under investigation for links to paramilitary gangs, drug cartels and anti-union brutality. Like NAFTA, it includes few labor protections, meaning it would enrich Bush’s corporate donors by forcing Americans into a wage-cutting competition with low-paid foreign workers. And, most important to Bush’s legacy, the pact could bust Democrats before they ever have a chance to unify. NAFTA proved that trade is the most divisive issue inside the Democratic Party. On one side is the party’s Wall Street wing that supports free trade. On the other side is its progressive wing that wants our trade policies reformed. Lately, the latter has increased its clout. As globalization became a major campaign theme in the last two elections, the watchdog group Public Citizen reports, free trade critics replaced free trade proponents in 69 House and Senate races. These new populists, along with Democrats’ more senior progressive incumbents, comprise a powerful new voting bloc promising to reject deals like the Colombia agreement and protect labor and human rights. Therefore, if Bush successfully uses the economic emergency to hustle a faction of Wall Street Democrats into supporting the deal, he will have potentially engineered a 1994 redux: Democratic infighting, a demoralized progressive base, and these newly elected fair-trade Democrats humiliated—and thus electorally endangered—by their own party standard-bearers. Certainly, with the president betting the economy on the Colombia deal, this is a difficult, high-stakes situation for Obama. But amid all the conflicting opinions he’s hearing, he has the sound advice of country music’s great political sage Kenny Rogers, who counsels that gambling greatness means knowing “when to walk away.” David Sirota is a best-selling author whose newest book, “The Uprising,” was released in June. He is a fellow at the Campaign for America’s Future and a board member of the Progressive States Network, both nonpartisan organizations. His blog is at www.credoaction.com/sirota. © 2008 Creators Syndicate Inc. Previous item: Abortion Is the Right Issue for Starting the Healing Next item: A Rejoinder to Gore Vidal New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By hippy pam, November 17, 2008 at 6:35 pm Link to this comment
Silly me….I thought the “bullshit bunch” already allowed COLOMBIA to bring in drugs with BULLSHITS BLESSING…I figure he has LOTS OF GOOD BUDDIES down there since he has allowed so many jobs to leave this country.
Report thisBy lawlessone, November 17, 2008 at 3:14 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
President Bush was asked in a recent CNN interview if he had any regrets. Despite an eight years’ accumulation of disasters to chose from, he came up mainly with just his frequent outbursts of high school level bravado. Apparently, only juvenile utterances like the bombastic “Bring it on!” or the massively wrong “Mission Accomplished” are deserving of regret.
Astonishing. Is he hoping in his last months in office that he will be referred to merely as a Lame Dork President?
Report thisBy Nataloff, November 17, 2008 at 9:06 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Has anyone noticed that, of all the Fed bailout recipients, the one that Republicans are closing ranks against is the automobile industry—the one where Union presence is strongest (as opposed to banks, brokerage houses, and re-insurers)? Between policies that drove American manufacturing jobs overseas, and now with a last chance to shut down the last remaining domestic factories, it’s gonna be back to sharecropping. But there may be hope: remember that the word “feudal” starts with “feud.”
Report thisBy knowbuddhau, November 16, 2008 at 8:49 am Link to this comment
Bravo, Alan MacDonald! What a fun read that was. Your sarcasm is Pythonesque in illuminating Bush’s crude falsehoods.
“America is center-right!” the Right began whining on November 5. And now we add, “The horrible noise you hear is not the mythical free market crashing all around you.”
So no matter what evidence accrues, the myth remains the same: Ayn Rand is god, Greenspan did no wrong, and the way forward is to redouble our efforts along the path to disaster.
Naomi Klein nailed it on her appearance on The Colbert Report:
Klein: “Yes. Here’s another example of disaster capitalism. After Hurricane Katrina, this is the classic example.”
Colbert: “I remember it. I remember it. Yeah?”
Klein: “I was in New Orleans. I was working on this book at the time. The city was still underwater. Richard Baker, the Republican congressman, says, ‘We couldn’t clean out the public housing projects, but God did.’ They used a horrible disaster to push through this preexisting agenda that hey had. They don’t believe in public housing. You know what they believe in?”
Colbert: “My friend, they were just giving credit where credit is due.”
Klein: “What they believe in is getting poor people into houses they can’t afford, so that their friends can speculate on the money, and then they can bail them out.”
http://www.democracynow.org/2008/10/3/headlines#11
I see feudalism, not democratic republicanism, in the every move of BushRoveCheneyCo.
That’s why I like Sirota’s article. Like you, he’s pointing out a glaring ommision in Bush’s myth: if Bush was really as portrayed in the propaganda, he would’ve walked away by now. He’s got his monkey fist clenched around our Common Weal, thrust way up inside our body politic, and he can’t begin to imagine letting go.
There will be no ‘walking away’ for this cult; disaster capitalism is what they do.
http://www.democracynow.org/2008/10/6/naomi_klein
In the 1950s, there was great concern at the State Department about the fact that Latin America, then as now… was moving to the left. There was concern about what they called the “pink economists,” the rise of developmentalism, import substitution, and, of course, socialism….
So, this plan was cooked up—it was between the head of USAID’s Chile office and the head of the University of Chicago’s Economics Department—to try to change the debate in Latin America, starting in Chile, because that’s where developmentalism had gained its deepest roots….
And so, the Chicago Boys were born. And it was considered a success, and the Ford Foundation got in on the funding. And hundreds and hundreds of Latin American students, on full scholarships, came to the University of Chicago in the 1950s and ’60s to study here to try to engage in what Juan Gabriel Valdes, Chile’s foreign minister after the dictatorship finally ended, described as a project of deliberate ideological transfer, taking these extreme-right ideas… and transplanting them to Latin America. That was his phrase—that is his phrase….” [End Klein]
“Feudalism in this sense is… based on the relation between lords and the peasants who worked their own land and that of the lord. The peasants owed labour service to the lords, who provided military protection and also had extensive police, judicial, and other rights over the peasants… Feudalism came to encompass all aspects of social organization and was characterized as a system that was both oppressive and hierarchical.” [Ency Brit 2008]
Report thisBy Leisure Suit Larry, November 16, 2008 at 7:57 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
David Sirota if he really wants “change” should stop his divisive rhetoric.
George Bush was born in New Haven, Connecticut where his family have roots 100 years old. He learned to ride a horse “Eastern” or English style at Philips Acadamy in Andover Massachusetts, He then got a history degree at Yale in his birth place of New Haven. He achieved a Masters in Business Management from Harvard in Cambridge Massachusetts. At what point in his life did he become “a cowboy?” Can he stay on a bull for 8 seconds? has he tried? What’s his best time in the calf roping contests Is he FFA? 4H?
Cowboys Mr. Sirota are beat by age 60. usually wrinkled tan and with back aches, and bad knees, and rough callosed hands. Georgie porgie Bush a cowboy? make me laugh.
Stop insulting cowboys, and mayne someday the Democrats will take Texas and Wyoming…. nah! just kidding, never Wyoming.
Report thisBy Jim Yell, November 16, 2008 at 7:39 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
A Trojan Horse is what Sirota describes and I hope the new administration pays attention. The Republicans have involved us in to many corrupt governments abroad and in the end have involved us in their crimes. Don’t forget that it was Reagan/Bush and Daddy Bush who worked to entrench Sadam in Iraq, don’t forget it was Republicans that worked to overthrow democracy in Chile and many other places. These have always been devices engineered by corporations trying to use the government to enhance their profits. The treason in this country is not from one lone and luny moslem convert, but from a huge block of American Internation Business corporations.
Report thisBy hippy pam, November 15, 2008 at 3:42 pm Link to this comment
We all know bullshit is just trying to make up a new story[lie] that will make him look good….just like all the other stories[lies]he has put out there for us….Please-President OBAMA-when you take position of the GOVERNMENT-REVERSE AS MANY OF the bullshit decisions as you can…and do this as quick as you can….because I can’t see any thing bullshit has done that has any merit….
Report thisBy prole, November 15, 2008 at 2:37 pm Link to this comment
It wouldn’t be the Democrats we all know if that shameful party didn’t spend the first days of their new return to the White House in an initial fit of posturing. Just as Republican elites need the votes of religious fundamentalists and throw them a policy bone every so often, so Democrats rely on union votes in part, and likewise offer a policy crumb on occassion. Even though Obama and Biden are both staunch supporters of the draconic Plan Columbia which has caused so much havoc in that country, they have joined with most other Democrats in congress in making a token display of opposition to a free-trade agreement that, while harmful enough in its own way, is not nearly so damaging to Columbian society as the ostensible drug eradication program that has provided over $5 billion in American military aid to Columbia since its inception by the last Democratic president, Clinton. Just as Clinton took over Bush I’s NAFTA folly and pushed it through willingly - without needing much pressure from big business (but getting a lot of encouragement from Sen. Biden who supported it from the start even under Bush) so Bush II, in a role reversal, later took over Plan Columbia from Clinton. And broad-minded Biden has again been unwavering in his support, along with most of his fellow Democrats, before and after the White House regime change, despite the well-known human toll among Columbian campesinos and unionists. Biden and Obama between them already possess considerable experience in ‘reaching across the aisle’ to form bipartisan consensus in support of legislation inimical to working class interests. So it perhaps may not seem so bizarre that Democrats should be willing to put up a front in opposing a “tiny little trade deal” since it won’t cost the Democrat’s corporate donors very much and it might help to rekindle their ‘progressive’ image among a gullible party base. And anyway, the Democrat-conceived Plan Columbia has already rewarded “a right-wing Colombian regime under investigation for links to paramilitary gangs, drug cartels and anti-union brutality.” As with NAFTA, any Democratic populists can expect to be humiliated by “their own party standard bearers” such as corporate waterboy, Joe Biden. “But amid all the conflicting opinions he’s hearing” Obama Copacabana who sometimes boasts of his own poker “gambling greatness” might make a counter-offer to his drugstore cowboy predecessor. If Bush withdraws his support for the predatory, tiny Columbia free-trade deal, Obama will withdraw his own support for the equally suspect, massive corporate bailout boondoggle. “Knowing ‘when to walk away’” might be a good habit to get into.
Report thisBy Alan MacDonald, November 15, 2008 at 1:13 pm Link to this comment
I assumed, wrongly, that two of the people most responsible for our economic abyss, Bush and Greenspan, might have a final ‘Casablanca moment’ and walk-off in the fog, agreeing that serving (drinks or duty) in a ‘Vichy’ government was getting old—- and strike out together with a new view of political economic democracy.
But this famous ending scene was not to be.
Greenspan at least said he was, “shocked, shocked” that his very faith in the sanctity of the free market had been privately strangled by a ‘corporatist Empire’ gaming the well-known ‘market FLAW’ of ‘negative externality cost dumping’ with ‘debt bombs’.
But as others have famously said, “Poor, George, he doesn’t even know ....”.
In this case, and for this second ‘poor George’, even though his father bought him a Harvard MBA education, young George never learned about the well-known ‘market failure’ of gaming ‘negative externality costs’ to create faux-profits—- and even though he was the ‘useful idiot’ through whom the biggest Ponzi scheme in the world was executed—- the dumb bastard still has the lunacy to say, just this week, as our country’s whole economy is dying of pre-meditated and intentionally inflicted wounds, “These problems are not the fault of free-market capitalism”.
With this big an arse, one wonders how there’s even room for the hole——but there is!
Report thisBy coloradokarl, November 15, 2008 at 8:05 am Link to this comment
WATCH the End of Term “PARDONS”. They are the KEY to the GOLDEN DOOR!!
Report thisBy P. T., November 14, 2008 at 3:16 pm Link to this comment
Regarding gambling and the maintaining of Democratic Party unity, when I was a Las Vegas craps dealer, we used to advise players that the family that plays together stays together.
Report thisBy Stephennnnn, November 14, 2008 at 1:24 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Obama’s plamn is to create jobs inside the US, not another trade deal that ships jobs out side the US. It stinks
Report thisBy Alan, November 14, 2008 at 9:46 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
hmmm.. the poker analogy brings to mind a
Report thishouse of cards. Is the Obama coalition going to
have a coherent progressive theme,
or will it get side tracked? There’s already
some indications that it is getting diverted early.
The Bush ploy is an early indicator. We’ll see.
By Anarcissie, November 14, 2008 at 8:33 am Link to this comment
By and large, in spite of all the talk, the rich don’t believe in capitalism or the so-called free market, either. These concepts are trotted out and retired according to their interests of the moment.
Report thisBy Fahrenheit 451, November 14, 2008 at 4:46 am Link to this comment
The real problem is; if we support bad business, it will drag us all down to a certain level of mediocrity. A sure sign of our demise on all fronts. RIP America.
Report thisBy Fahrenheit 451, November 14, 2008 at 4:39 am Link to this comment
Well, here’s how I see it; starting with Clinton (maybe before), every economic decision made by the government has been fatally flawed. NAFTA, GAT, FTA’s, and foreign aid has been used for the good of the corporations and the rest of the world’s bad.
Report thisIn the early 70’s it was apparent to anybody with an average I.Q. that energy was going to get expensive. GM, Ford, and Chrysler completely ignored that clarion call; so too our lovely government. We’ve wasted 38 years on bullshit and corporate profits.
And here we are: Now, why should we bail out greed, STUPIDITY, and just plain apathy? When businesses make stupid and wrong decisions; they should go down. It’s time to pay the piper. GM doesn’t deserve to live; nor does any business that is run so stupidly.
By gilly, November 14, 2008 at 1:55 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
So even in it’s dying days, the bush administration is trading its own nation for their own devious ends. Who is behind this one then? three guesses but of course you only need one!!!
Report thisLets hope the auto industry can hang on until January and then Obama can do something constructive to help them.
All these problems happened under Bush’s watch. There was no regulation in the financial system and unbelievably we learn that Poulson was in conclave with other financiers to bring about what has happened to Wall Street and is alleged to have said(I think it is on tape) “If this goes wrong we are in big trouble” and laughed, yet he is now overseeing where the bailout money goes.
It must be the biggest scam in history.
The repugs have sold the nation down the river and they are still hastily continuing to do so.
I’ll bet there is major shredding of documents up there in the White House and as for e mails I’ll bet they have the best “hackers” in the country working on cleaning their computers.
Roll on January.