Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
Top Banner, Site wide
Apr 19, 2014

 Choose a size
Text Size

Top Leaderboard, Site wide

Drought Adds to Syria’s Misery




The Divide


Truthdig Bazaar
The Prison Letters of Fidel Castro

The Prison Letters of Fidel Castro

by Fidel Castro (Author), Luis Conte Aguero (Epilogue), Ann Louise Bardach (Introduction)
$11.86

more items

 
Report

Paying for Eight Years of Bush’s Delusions

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Nov 8, 2008
Bush
AP photo / Charles Dharapak

President Bush as he makes a statement about the economic bailout bill and financial crisis on Sept. 30 at the White House.

By Robert Fisk

Editor’s note: This article was originally printed in The Independent.

American lawyers defending six Algerians before a habeas corpus hearing in Washington this week learned some very odd things about U.S. intelligence after 9/11. From among the millions of “raw” reports from American spies and their “assets” around the world came a CIA Middle East warning about a possible kamikaze-style air attack on a U.S. navy base at a south Pacific island location. The only problem was that no such navy base existed on the island and no U.S. Seventh Fleet warship had ever been there. In all seriousness, a U.S. military investigation earlier reported that Osama bin Laden had been spotted shopping at a post office on a U.S. military base in east Asia.

That this nonsense was disseminated around the world by those tasked to defend the United States in the “war on terror” shows the fantasy environment in which the Bush regime has existed these past eight years. If you can believe that bin Laden drops by a shopping mall on an American military base, then you can believe that everyone you arrest is a “terrorist”, that Arabs are “terrorists”, that they can be executed, that living “terrorists” must be tortured, that everything a tortured man says can be believed, that it is legitimate to invade sovereign states, to grab the telephone records of everyone in America. As Bob Herbert put it in The New York Times a couple of years ago, the Bush administration wanted these records “which contain crucial documentation of calls for a Chinese takeout in Terre Haute, Indiana, and birthday greetings to Grandma in Talladega, Alabama, to help in the search for Osama bin Laden”. There was no stopping Bush when it came to trampling on the US Constitution. All that was new was that he was now applying the same disrespect for liberty in America that he had shown in the rest of the world.

But how is Barack Obama going to repair the titanic damage which his vicious, lying predecessor has perpetrated around the globe and within the U.S. itself? John F Kennedy once said that “the United States, as the world knows, will never start a war.”  After Bush’s fear-mongering and Rumsfeld’s “shock and awe” and Abu Ghraib and Bagram and Guantanamo and secret renditions, how does Obama pedal his country all the way back to Camelot? Our own dear Gordon Brown’s enthusiasm to Hoover up the emails of the British people is another example of how Lord Blair’s sick relationship with Bush still infects our own body politic. Only days before the wretched president finally departs from us, new U.S. legislation will ensure that citizens of his lickspittle British ally will no longer be able to visit America without special security clearance. Does Bush have any more surprises for us before 20 January? Indeed, could anything surprise us any more?

Obama has got to close Guantanamo. He’s got to find a way of apologising to the world for the crimes of his predecessor, not an easy task for a man who must show pride in his country; but saying sorry is what – internationally – he will have to do if the “change” he has been promoting at home is to have any meaning outside America’s borders. He will have to re-think – and deconstruct – the whole “war on terror”. He will have to get out of Iraq. He will have to call a halt to America’s massive airbases in Iraq, its $600m embassy. He will have to end the blood-caked air strikes we are perpetrating in southern Afghanistan – why, oh, why do we keep slaughtering wedding parties? – and he will have to tell Israel a few home truths: that America can no longer remain uncritical in the face of Israeli army brutality and the colonisation for Jews and Jews only on Arab land. Obama will have to stand up at last to the Israeli lobby (it is, in fact, an Israeli Likud party lobby) and withdraw Bush’s 2004 acceptance of Israel’s claim to a significant portion of the West Bank. U.S. officials will have to talk to Iranian officials – and Hamas officials, for that matter. Obama will have to end U.S. strikes into Pakistan – and Syria.

Advertisement

Square, Site wide
Indeed, there’s a growing concern among America’s allies in the Middle East that the U.S. military has to be brought back under control – indeed, that the real reason for General David Petraeus’ original appointment in Iraq was less to organise the “surge” than it was to bring discipline back to the 150,000 soldiers and marines whose mission – and morals – had become so warped by Bush’s policies. There is some evidence, for example, that the four-helicopter strike into Syria last month, which killed eight people, was – if not a rogue operation – certainly not sanctioned by Washington or indeed by US commanders in Baghdad.

But Obama’s not going to be able to make the break. He wants to draw down in Iraq in order to concentrate more firepower in Afghanistan. He’s not going to take on the lobby in Washington and he’s not going to stop further Jewish colonisation of the occupied territories or talk to Israel’s enemies. With AIPAC supporter Rahm Emanuel as his new chief of staff – “our man in the White House,” as the Israeli daily Maariv called him this week – Obama will toe the line. And of course, there’s the terrible thought that bin Laden – when he’s not shopping at U.S. military post offices – may be planning another atrocity to welcome the Obama presidency.

There is just one little problem, though, and that’s the “missing” prisoners. Not the victims who have been (still are being?) tortured in Guantanamo, but the thousands who have simply disappeared into U.S. custody abroad or – with American help – into the prisons of U.S. allies. Some reports speak of 20,000 missing men, most of them Arabs, all of them Muslims. Where are they? Can they be freed now? Or are they dead? If Obama finds that he is inheriting mass graves from George W. Bush, there will be a lot of apologising to do.


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By Grousefeather, November 8, 2008 at 7:43 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

To be fair, to be decent, and to be perfectly accurate, it must be said that George W. Bush is and has always been the consummate conservative republican. That being said, to assess the damages wrought on the world by the political ideology implemented by republicans but then blame George W. Bush alone is a new low in scapegoating. What’s worse is that doing so allows the true culprits, Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, Paul Wolfowitz, Newt Gingrich, Dick Cheney, Grover Norquist, and a host of other equally dark and nefarious despots to escape admitting their intellectual deficiencies in formulating and promoting as reputable the totally disreputable conservative republican ideology.

I would urge those inclined to unleash vindictive on the pitiful and ignominious figure of George W. Bush to instead substitute his name, whenever you feel a call to use it, with the word republican. Then, and only then, will you cast the full light of truth on the brutal and hellish political dogma that has so disfigured, and made garish, America’s leadership image around the world.

By electing Mr. Obama to be our president, we have not only effectively repudiated the awful republican ideology that has so insidiously infected the political landscape of our country, we have finally reduced it’s nasty influence to the size where it’s easily drowned in an average bathtub.

Report this

By Folktruther, November 8, 2008 at 6:46 pm Link to this comment

It is impossible to repair the damage until it is acknowledged that it exists. The Bushites led a counterrvolution in the US and this fundamentally changed the Americaan form of governance.  But since the mass media, Dems and imperialist progressives don’t say so, the American people don’t realize it.

Report this

By Dr. Knowitall, PhD, PhD, November 8, 2008 at 6:32 pm Link to this comment

People all over the world danced and chanted “Obama” “Obama” while carrying signs with his name after he won the election.

I don’t think anything more has to be said.  And I know Obama will do the right thing—which will be so utterly refreshing. He’s no idiot, you know.

Report this

By leilah, November 8, 2008 at 6:24 pm Link to this comment

Once again Mr Fisk’s writing jerks me into the real world.  I remember President Ford’s words after Nixon’s exit, “The national nightmare is over.”  I wish I could hear that now and believe it.
After the Supreme Court appointed Bush to the Presidency in 2000, I thought that he’d last only one term, and maybe, that old axiom about a man rising to the office might be true.
From 2001 to today, my heart has been in my throat.  I couldn’t believe it. I work with educated engineers in the Northeast and I was struck by how they blindly followed this strange man.  I was struck by their nastiness at any voice to the contrary, their refusal or inability to accept what obviously exposed the truth and ran counter to their warped and blinded worldview. 
These people might be gone in a few months, maybe not.  Their goals and utterly sick ideas will remain.
Bush’s administration has been an example of the phrase that was common in 60s college literature classes, “Man’s inhumanity to man.”
They say it takes about five years for a company get over the harm done to it by a bad manager.  How long will it be before decent Americans can get that recurring bad taste out of their mouths?
On the positive side, I can no longer be told that two and two is three and ninth-tenths.

Report this

By yours truly, November 8, 2008 at 5:42 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Apologies & Much More Will Have To Be Forthcoming

“Otherwise?”

“The abyss.”

“Why is that?”

“It’s now or never.”

“Due to?”

“Perpetual war + global warming + economic collapse = doomsday.”

“Unless?”

“We make sure that Obama delivers on his campaign promise to end the Iraq War.”

“Based on?”

“Yes we can.”

“And then what sort of world?”

“It’ll be up to us.

Report this

Page 2 of 2 pages  <  1 2

Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
Right 1, Site wide - BlogAds Premium
 
Right 2, Site wide - Blogads
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
Right Skyscraper, Site Wide
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion   Publisher, Zuade Kaufman   Editor, Robert Scheer
© 2014 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.

Like Truthdig on Facebook