LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.   Exclusive Truthdig Merchandise: Mr. Fish T-shirts and Signed Prints
February 10, 2010
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

The Terror-Industrial Complex

Wall Street Wants a Refund

America's Confused Approach to Afghanistan

Haiti, Forgive Us

Palin Calls Global Warming Research 'Snake Oil Science'

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Wall Street Wants a Refund
 * NEW! * Haiti, Forgive Us

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101

Truthdig Bazaar
Motherhood Manifesto

Motherhood Manifesto

By Joan Blades and Kristin Rowe-Finkbeiner
$8.97

The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy

The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy

By John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt
$26.00

more items

 
Reports

Neocons Plot to Co-Opt Obama

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Nov 6, 2008

By William Pfaff

Since the triumph of Barack Obama, nearly every medium of news and political comment in the United States and abroad has carried a compendium of “challenges” and dangers facing the next president. Yet when these challenges are examined, they nearly all turn out to be potential opportunities.

So far as they are obstacles, they usually involve efforts by other governments to block the United States from continuing policies of the Bush government meant to manipulate or intimidate them.

The basic Bush policies—defense spending at levels higher than all the rest of the world combined, unilateralism, hostility to the United Nations and international law, advocacy of “preventive” wars, efforts to dominate the Middle East, constant pressure on Russia and what might be called contingent hostility toward China, opposition to European Union efforts at military cooperation—all have been promoted since the 1990s by nationalist and neoconservative Republicans acting through the conservative Washington think tanks.

These reflect the long-term ambitions for economic and military hegemony that animated Bush administration foreign policy. Many of the same people and their followers will try to introduce the same ideas into the foreign policy of the new Obama government. The president-elect is a foreign policy novice and will find himself under great pressure to follow Middle Eastern and China and Russia policies inherited from George Bush, even though these are what Barack Obama was elected to change or terminate.

Take the supposed threat to an Obama government from a “resurgent Russia,” trying to change the frontiers of post-Cold War Europe by intimidating its near neighbors.

Advertisement

This is a challenge to the United States only as a reaction to neoconservative efforts to reshape the geopolitical configuration of the new Europe in a way that expands American power.

Under Bush, the United States renounced the ABM treaty and declared its intention to install new missile systems close to Russia. It has already recruited all of Russia’s close neighbors into an expanded NATO, and wants to bring in Georgia and Ukraine, and possibly some of the ex-Soviet Central Asian countries. It promotes the installation of pro-American governments in those countries. Who can be surprised that Russia reacts? It would be like Russia building a new missile system in Mexico, and recruiting allies in Central America. It also weakens NATO to link Poland’s legitimate and enforceable demand for security to irresponsible guarantees given to countries NATO cannot defend (as in the Georgia case).

There is a simple first step in dealing with Russian “challenges” to the West. It is to stop provoking Russia and treating it as an enemy. One may not like the new authoritarianism of the Putin-Medvedev government in Moscow, or Russia’s political manipulation of its oil exports, but the former is a Russian affair, and the latter goes on everywhere else.

Obama promised to withdraw most U.S. forces from Iraq by mid-2010. The present situation in Iraq is written about as a “threat” in that Washington has been unable to reach an agreement with the Iraq government on terms to allow American military forces to remain in Iraq after their U.N. mandate to be there expires at the end of this year.

Most Americans, by their votes in this week’s election, as in the 2006 congressional election, demonstrated that they want American forces to leave Iraq. They want those forces to leave “honorably,” and not leave chaos behind, but if the Iraq government, parliament and a large part of the Iraqi public want the American occupation to end, what is the problem in Washington’s doing as asked?

Even if Iraq should prove incapable of settling its internal problems on its own, where is the threat or challenge to the U.S.? The actual danger would be to remain against Iraq’s will, and risk being swept again into Iraq’s internal conflicts.

The Bush administration and its backers wanted to keep a privileged position in Iraq’s economy and oil industry. The Pentagon has from the start of the Iraq war wanted permanent bases there. But if Iraqi authorities and the public refuse, the only intelligent response is to agree to leave. To refuse or delay would implicitly acknowledge that the new administration wants to go on controlling Iraq as a means to controlling, or trying to control, the Middle East and to exploit its resources—which is just what America’s enemies say.

Possibly this is the course that Barack Obama will decide upon. Here and elsewhere in policy choices for the region, he will be under heavy pressure from his campaign promises to Israel to, in effect, continue Bush administration policy for the Middle East. But that is not what the people who voted for him expect.

A big struggle over control of Obama’s foreign policy has already begun with his first White House staff nominees. Many of the people currently advising him, and all of those behind past Bush policies, are going to tell him his administration must choose between “weakness,” on the one hand, and “strength” plus “global leadership,” on the other hand. The latter means a quest for American hegemony that wouldn’t be any more successful under Obama than it was under Bush, and along the way would destroy his presidency just as it destroyed George Bush’s.

Visit William Pfaff’s Web site at www.williampfaff.com.

© 2008 Tribune Media Services Inc.


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Respectnjustice4all, November 10, 2008 at 12:50 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Seems to me:-
There is now 27000 Nukes of which 95 percent are USA’s & Russia’s. Some are 1000 times the power of Hiroshima. AND, they want to ESCALATE the military?
We ought be making friends with Russia (not an enemy) which now (minus it’s Neocon/ Bolshevik/Oligarchs) is a totally natural ally. So who is doing the “divide & rule” and why?
Looks pretty much like the “Israel/Neo-cons, Oil, Banking & Military supply profiteers”? Who else? The US Govt might run out of money but don’t bet these groups haven’t been socking the trillions away offshore. Try researching Bilderberg group. My question is just who is all this 10 Trillion National Debt owed too? Only a small fraction is China.

Report this

By George B, November 9, 2008 at 2:00 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Russia Intimidates Its Neighbours?
I thought it was the US pushing Russias neighbours to intimidate Russia!!! Or is it Russia building the Missile Defence System in the countries close to the US?
I guess I have it all mixed up!
The Ossetian war was caused by Russia too?
So why Georgia needed those american and israeli advisers and weapons? To play innocent games with innocent civilian lives!

Report this

By eileen fleming, November 9, 2008 at 10:09 am #

We the people rose up in record numbers and expressed our HOPE and clear mandate against President Bush’s failed foreign policies of militarism and imperialism.

President Elect O chose a Chief of Staff and a VP who are both blatant Zionists with histories of supporting the empires violence.

The good fight for equal human rights, upholding of international law and COMMON SENSE falls once more onto we the people to lead our leaders in the way we should go: Justice and Peace NOT Military Occupation’s!


“Soon after I had published the pamphlet “Common Sense” [on Feb. 14, 1776] in America, I saw the exceeding probability that a revolution in the system of government would be followed by a revolution in the system of religion… The world is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion.”-Tom Paine

On with THAT Revolution!

A healthy democracy thrives on DISSENT and requires ACTION by its citizens.

Please Send President Elect Obama your message’s

http://change.gov/page/s/contact

Report this

By cyrena, November 9, 2008 at 4:44 am #

By Inherit the Wind

“..How exciting it must be to live in this imaginary world full of paranoia.  I knew an AOG cultist who actually BELIEVED he had been in battles with demons, chasing them around his house..and it sounds the same to me!..”

~~~

I had to laugh out loud at this. Some of these folks really do sound like the folks in the mental facilities, (or hanging out on the internet).

But, I agree with Diamond on the 9/11 Conspiracy. It WAS a black ops conspiracy in my book. I don’t know exactly how they pulled it off, but actors from the PNAC were involved. All we have to do is compare the signatures to know that.

Now I’m not buying all of the Trilateral Commission connects, or any of that New World Order stuff, but I’m inclined to believe that the anthrax attacks were part of the 9/11 hoax, and I wouldn’t mind hauling Perle and Wolfowitz before a tribunal to find out how they did it, and when they first hatched this “War on Terror” shit. It was long before they planned 9/11, which was the kickoff, and provided the excuse to destroy the Constitution, the rule of law, civil liberties, the economy, and kill millions of people.

Still, I do know what you mean about the paranoid schitzo’s.

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, November 9, 2008 at 1:20 am #

This thread’s a conspiracy paranoic’s paradise!  Every loony fantasy about 9/11, the Trilateral Commission, the PNAC and probably the Illuminati are to blame here!

The president of Iran sends an unprecedented letter of congratulations to President-Elect Obama—and the mad tin-foil-hatters see that as “proof” he’s gonna nuke ‘em!

The President is an impulsive, ignorant idiot who shoots from the hip and never analyzes an issue or an action.  The President-Elect is careful, thoughtful, weighs every fact and gets the best advice before he makes a decision and then words it with EXTREME care, yet somehow, to you loonies, they are nothing but twin sons of different mothers.

How exciting it must be to live in this imaginary world full of paranoia.  I knew an AOG cultist who actually BELIEVED he had been in battles with demons, chasing them around his house..and it sounds the same to me!

Yeah, I KNOW the neo-cons will try to co-opt Obama.  Yes they’ll try, because like the stinging scorpion in the fable, that’s what they do.  But they won’t get anywhere, not with Barack Obama.  He’s too smart and too tough to get pulled in.

Report this

By smendler, November 8, 2008 at 11:21 pm #

I for one would have no problem with the immediate indictment/arrest/detention of Wolfowitz, Perle, et al. for deception and fraud against the American people, pending a full investigation of the runup to the Iraq invasion.

Report this

By Folktruther, November 8, 2008 at 11:00 pm #

Diamond- Obama IS asserting himself on foreign policy.  Now.  RIGHT NOW!  The ‘poor guy’ as you characterize him, is making nuclear war more likely.  The time to attack him for it is NOW, not wait until the decisions are decisively institutionalzed.

It may already be too late.  The time to attack him was during the primary nominations and election, when progressives had some leverage.  Supporting him and hoping for the best is not practical policitics, Diamand.  You’re thinking of Tinkerbell.

Report this

By yours truly, November 8, 2008 at 8:48 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Indeed The Choice For Obama Is Between Weakness On The One Hand And Strength + Global Leadership On The Other

“Weakness as defined by?”

“Obama caves-in to the Neocon agenda.”

“Whereas Strength + Global Leadership denotes?”

“Obama keeps his campaign promise to pull our troops out of Iraq within 16 months.”

“Based on?”

“Yes we can.”

Report this

By diamond, November 8, 2008 at 8:35 pm #

Robert, all my reading and research has led me to conclude that 9/11 was a black op planned for years by far right groups, as set out in PNAC, and carried out by the CIA, the Pentagon, NORAD and the neo cons with the knowledge and or involvement of Mossad and MI6. I always wondered about the British role in all of this but then I found out some disturbing facts on the relationship between the CIA and the British government.Britain also armed Iran and Iraq during the Iran/Iraq war on behalf of the United States according to a statement made in March 1991 by Terence Charles Byrne Senior, an American arms dealer and former director of a British company, Allivane International Limited. This company was set up by Bryne’s son at the request of Wiliam Casey, Director of the CIA. Casey had promised the Iranians huge quantities of arms and ammunition, long range artillery and electronics in return for the delay of the release of the American Embassy hostages as part of a CIA plan to de-rail Jimmy Carter’s campaign for re-election.‘I can document that one consignment of three large flasks of radioactive caesium was sent to Denmark from where it was exported to Portugal and onwards via Cyprus and Israel to Iran’ he testified. This, of course,  makes the CIA and Israel’s claims about the dangers of a nuclear armed Iran completely farcical.Byrne’s analysis of the situation had led him to conclude that Britain has a culture of secrecy and dependency on the United States which allows such a weapons trade to flourish. ‘Although the United Kingdom operates in tandem with the United States, the relationship is not a partnership.’ Byrne points out that the Royal Navy is unable to target or launch its Polaris nuclear missiles without the permission of the United States, and U.S. intelligence agencies are outside of Britain’s control even when they operate on British soil:
‘Our Defence Intelligence Agency and the CIA now operate in the United Kingdom with the knowledge and the consent of that country’s government. No country outside of the United States is now so effectively under the control of these agencies.’ If this is true and I think it is, then Britain’s defence establishment is now simply a part of the CIA and the American defence establishment. Which explains why Britain was in Iraq and is still in Afghanistan and has run with the 9/11/CIA agenda.
For those complaining about Obama continuing to install the missiles in Poland I can only say I’m not surprised. Obama gets an intelligence briefing from the very people whose livelihood depends on war and ever more war. The missiles are clearly aimed at Russia and the Russians are not stupid enough to think they’re aimed at Iran. But, on the other hand, the poor guy isn’t even President yet!It will take a while to see how prepared he is to assert himself on foreign policy. My guess is he couldn’t possibly do a worse job than Bush and Cheney have done and will probably do considerably better. He is extremely intelligent and will be a problem for the CIA in a way that Bush was not capable of, McCain was not inclined to be and Palin would simply have been another Bush. American voters need to continue to support Obama and to tune the media out. The media will turn on him soon enough once the puppy stories end and Obama has to tackle the enormous mess and the enormous debt the Republicans have left. I can recommend a book called ‘McMafia’ that came out quite recently. It details the unholy alliance between the intelligence services and organized crime which operates globally.

Report this

By Folktruther, November 8, 2008 at 5:02 pm #

The NYTimes has ‘Corrected’ its report, due no doubt to the horrified response.

Report this

By mill, November 8, 2008 at 4:30 pm #

Mr. Pfaff underestimates the President-elect.  Unlike Mr. Bush, who leaned toward the neo-con view and was run over by them, Mr. Obama is smarter, better informed, and not a neo-con.  He won’t look into a Putin’s eyes and think he understands anything at all about the former KGB official

That Pfaff thinks Obama could be maneuvered or manipulated as the present oval office occupant has been badly misjudges the President-elect imho

Report this

By Folktruther, November 8, 2008 at 3:22 pm #

The NYTimes has just reported that Obama has called the president of Poland to assure him that he hopes American-Polish defense cooperation continues. The Polish chief of state reported publically that Obaama is for continuing to install the missile defense system in Poland.  This is in reality a first strike nuclear weapon absurdly stated to be aimed at Iran.  Obama stated publucally that he would only install it if it ‘works.’

Obama is following Bush’s military imperialism that increases the likelihood of a thermanuclear war.  In retaliation and deterence for the US first strike, Russia is erecting a first strike nuclear response.  This leads to a new Cold War with Russia.

But imperialist Dems and progressives who support Obama don’t want to see this.  Or want others to see it.  Their approach is to stall; wait and see.  Until a first strike response is installed and its too late to do anything about it.  Just as they want to deflect criticism from Obama during the election to after he is elected, when progressives have no leverage.

By calling Poland,instead of, say, Russia, Obama indicates where his geo-strategic sympathies lie.  And the military is already making public noises that withdrawing combat troops in 16 months is just ‘not possible.’  They can put them in there in a less than a few weeks but as for taking them out…

It is necessary to oppose Obama’s military imperialism NOW and that of imperialist Dems as well.  Once it has hardened it will be much more difficult.  It is obviious that Obama is breaking the few progressive promises that he made.

Report this

By cann4ing, November 8, 2008 at 1:24 pm #

Robert, I think too much can be read into the selection of Rahm Emanuel as the WH chief of staff, just as too much can be read into Obama’s AIPAC appearance, which was designed to get votes.  Obama and Emanuel have known one another for many years.  During that time they took very different positions both with respect to Iraq and Israel/Palestine.

(If Obama’s pre-U.S. Senate positions are indicative of his true desires, he could potentially serve as an honest broker—we will have to wait and see.)

But one is not selected as the WH Chief of Staff because of their views on the Middle East.  It is a position where managerial skills are a must, irrespective of ideology, and within that narrow niche, Emanuel is an excellent choice.

Report this

By thebeerdoctor, November 8, 2008 at 12:36 pm #

“But Obama’s not going to be able to make the break. He wants to draw down in Iraq in order to concentrate more firepower in Afghanistan. He’s not going to take on the lobby in Washington and he’s not going to stop further Jewish colonization of the occupied territories or talk to Israel’s enemies. With AIPAC supporter Rahm Emanuel as his new chief of staff—“our man in the White House”, as the Israeli daily Maariv called him this week—Obama will toe the line.”
Robert Fisk

Let’s wait and see if Mr. Robert is right.

Report this

By Leefeller, November 8, 2008 at 11:00 am #

Change and Hope, may be, but one must wait and see.

Hope the cynics are wrong, but if they are not I will join them.

As some stated we can try and hold Obama’s feet to the fire?

Report this

By SFB Person, November 8, 2008 at 5:56 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

...on Obama’s motives vis-a-vis Emanuel.

This choice would be a shrewd move by Obama to keep is ass alive until he had a chance to get his own security organized.

Was that his motive?  I doubt it to be honest, but who knows? 

I actually would like to see Obama’s cabinet populated with guys like Emanuel.  Hard nosed people who can get things done.  Just not if it means Americans die so Israelis don’t need to, and that Israel continues to parasitize us mercilessly.

Report this

By Alan, November 8, 2008 at 3:46 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

It’s not a plot schmuckos, it’s a fait accompli, it’s a Rahm go in Washington now.

Report this

By Robert, November 8, 2008 at 12:21 am #

November 7 / 9, 2008

The Promised Land?

Obama, Emanuel and Israel

By JOHN V. WHITBECK

“In the first major appointment of his administration, President-elect Barack Obama has named as his chief of staff Congressman Rahm Emanuel, an Israeli citizen and Israeli army veteran whose father, according to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, was a member of Menachem Begin’s Irgun forces during the Nakba and named his son after “a Lehi combatant who was killed”—i.e., a member of Yitzhak Shamir’s terrorist Stern Gang, responsible for, in addition to other atrocities against Palestinians, the more famous bombing of the King David Hotel and assassination of the UN peace envoy Count Folke Bernadotte.

In rapid response to this news, the editorial in the next day’s Arab News (Jeddah) was entitled “Don’t pin much hope on Obama—Emanuel is his chief of staff and that sends a message”. This editorial referred to the Irgun as a “terror organization” (a judgment call) and concluded: “Far from challenging Israel, the new team may turn out to be as pro-Israel as the one it is replacing.”

That was always likely. Obama repeatedly pledged unconditional allegiance to Israel during his campaign, most memorably in an address to the AIPAC national convention which Israeli peace activist Uri Avnery characterized as “a speech that broke all records for obsequiousness and fawning”, and America’s electing a black president has always been more easily imagined than any American president’s declaring his country’s independence from Israeli domination.

Still, one of the greatest advantages for the United States in electing Barack Hussein Obama was the prospect that the world’s billion-plus Muslims, who now view the United States with almost universal loathing and hatred, would be dazzled by the new president’s eloquence, life story, skin color and middle name, would think again with open minds and would give America a chance to redeem itself in their eyes and hearts—not incidently, drastically shortening the long lines of aspiring jihadis eager to sacrifice their lives while striking a blow against the evil empire.

The profound loathing and hatred of the Muslim world toward the United States, which has always had its roots for America’s unconditional support for the injustices inflicted and still being inflicted on the Palestinians, can fairly be considered the core of the primary foreign policy and “national security” problems confronting the United States in recent years. Why would Obama, a man of unquested brilliance, have chosen to send such a contemptuous message to the Muslim world with his first major appointment? Why would he wish to disabuse the Muslim world of its hopes (however modest) and slap it across the face at the ealiest opportunity?

A further contemptuous message is widely rumored to be forthcoming—the naming as “Special Envoy for Middle East Peace” of Dennis Ross, the notorious Israel-Firster who, throughout the 12 years of the Bush the First and Clinton administrations, ensured that American policy toward the Palestinians did not deviate one millimeter from Israeli policy and that no progress toward peace could be made and who has since headed the AIPAC spin-off “think tank”, the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.”

http://www.counterpunch.org/whitbeck11072008.html

Report this

By Big B, November 7, 2008 at 11:43 pm #

The neocon scourge is not yet over. They are a wounded animal now, capable of almost any attrocity. I feel that they may just be mean spirited enough to drag us down to hell with them. That is why, although it flys in the face of everything a good hippy believes, the neocons must be crushed. the liberals can show no mercy. They must march on a road of bones to a new era where we will be able to address the challenges of golbal warming, of diminishing resources, of over population, without the interference of those who would have america look back to an imperfect past for answers to future problems.

Barry and his new power base need to lead boldly, or get the hell out of the way. There will be no room in the future for people with a vision of only the past. The next four years could be our finest hour, or be our epitath.

Report this

By Robert, November 7, 2008 at 8:57 pm #

By diamond, November 7 at 2:37 pm

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Diamond…I just read your outstanding post/comment regarding the CIA & the neocons. I have also read your other post on the other thread “The flagrantly Dreadful ‘Joe Lieberman’. Your information & input are solid. It makes me wonder about your resume & background!

I wonder what your thoughts / resources are regarding 9/11…the CIA…Neocons…Mossad…etc…?

Report this

By diamond, November 7, 2008 at 7:37 pm #

The neo cons and the CIA are in the habit of killing people who don’t agree with their twisted view of the world. Obama is clever, talented and knows what’s wrong and how it can be fixed but he has to walk the same dangerous path the Kennedys walked and Martin Luther King walked. I can understand why Rahm Emanuel was reluctant to be Obama’s chief of staff. Anyone with a family would want to avoid the struggle with these monsters, and believe me that’s exactly what they are. The CIA is supposed to defend American democracy but they are the most undemocratic organization in the world and the most amoral. They have decades of blood on their hands and believe democracy is for saps. Kennedy fired Dulles but he should have cleaned the whole place out root and branch. The CIA has the ethics of their friends in organized crime - namely, none- so anyone with ethics, who believes in the rule of law will always be perceived by them as a threat. The writer Chalmers Johnson said that all intelligence matters should be removed from the CIA and given to the state department. He claimed that the future of American democracy depended on it. The whole ‘Russian threat’ thing comes from the CIA, as does the ‘Iran is a terrorist state’ mantra. They have no investment in peace and do not ascribe to the idea of ‘blessed are the peacemakers’. Their role is a completely destructive one, even though they see themselves as heroes. Their only adaptation to the 21st century was to move from being murderously anti-communist to being murderously anti-Muslim but with their core values of corruption, cynicism and barbaric cruelty untouched. The neo cons and the CIA are two sides of a coin.

Report this

By dr wu, November 7, 2008 at 7:17 pm #

Good cop (Obama); Bad Cop (Bush)  what a world!

The US will stop trying to rule/ruin the world its own stupid way when the money and oil runs out.

Report this

By prole, November 7, 2008 at 7:01 pm #

Of course, the neo-con’s are always plotting - but in this instance they needn’t bother. Obama is their Likudnik soulmate, a bought-and-paid-for step-‘n-fetch-it for The Lobby. It’s interesting to note in fact, that Obama’s candidacy in the Democratic primaries experienced a sharp upward spike after his toadyish appearance at the AIPAC annual convention in June, where he paid obeisance to zionist king makers, a regular ritual any Democratic candidate for national office has to perform to be given a serious chance of election. This is the same Obama who in the most important - and ignored - statement of his craven political ascent once rightly observed, “no one has suffered more than the Palestinians.” Strange, that he left that glaring point out of his AIPAC script, what? It only goes to prove once again, what a two-faced, opportunistic, machine-party hack Obama Copacabana actually is under his gauzy, rhetorical front. The appointment of former AIPAC canvasser, Rahm Emanuel should dispel any lingering doubts about Obama’s commitment to the neo-con agenda; never mind the likes of sinister paid advisers - and likely administration appointees - like Anthony Lake, Martin Indyk, Dennis Ross, et.al. This is the price Obama had to pay to get The Lobby’s blessing and further his nomination prospects - his chief-of-staff and key advisers all pre-approved to insure a smooth ideological transition. Once again, as in domestic affairs, “even though these are what Barack Obama was elected to change or terminate”,  the policies are those of the bipartisan elite that control both wings of the Duopoly Party. Take military (aka “defense”) spending, Obama has already asserted his intention to add close to 100,000 new groundtroops, increase R & D, and pursue new weapons systems. He doesn’t want to withdraw troops from Iraq, he simply wants to “re-deploy” them to neighboring countries - and of course, he wants to give $30 million in new aid to Israel over the next ten years. And incredibly enough, contrary to international law and official State Dept. policy, he believes Jerusalem should be the undivided capital of Israel! Obama has also indicated his intention to continue with ABM installations in Poland and maybe elsewhere and has declared his willingness to use military force to defend American so-called “interests” around the world, including “unilaterally if necessary”.  By posing as a ‘progressive’ (and discrediting the whole notion in the process), Obama will make it easier for neo-con’s to pursue their objectives. Virtually everything he has said and done since being adopted by the party elites who have groomed him for this role, “reflect the long-term ambitions for economic and military hegemony that animated Bush administration foreign policy.”  Yes, “most Americans, by their votes in this week’s election, as in the 2006 congressional election, demonstrated that they want American forces to leave Iraq. They want those forces to leave “honorably,” and not leave chaos behind” - but as in 2006, what the American public “want” and what they get are two different matters entirely. (It’s also impossible to imagine American forces leaving Iraq “honorably” since the entire sordid invasion and occupation is inherently dishonorable in the extreme, but that’s a lengthier subject.) So if Obama has apparently made the Faustian bargain that all ambitious politicians fall into in their thirst for power - and the only thing other really different about him is his race - then that misuse of power should by right “destroy his presidency just as it destroyed George Bush’s.”

Report this

By Robert, November 7, 2008 at 6:33 pm #

November 6, 2008

A Plea from Israel

Come, Obama, Change My Life

By EDNA CANETTI

“Obama my dear, they tell me that you are going to change the world. Do me a favor, come and change my life personally.

Come to Israel, grab its stupid leadership by the throat and take its foot off the neck of another people. Come and force us to do what is clear, and written, and fitting, and necessary, come and get us out of the Territories, if necessary do it with a smile that reveals million-dollar teeth. If necessary bare your teeth and force us to do it.

Make it so that I don’t have to get up in the morning – I who hate to get up early, to go to the checkpoints, to watch and to weep. Make it so I will not have to see 19-year-old children who have been duped into believing that they are defending the home front by pointing rifles at five-year-old children.

Make it so that when my daughters take a shower for half an hour I don’t have to think about Ayad’s family from Awarta that puts buckets under all the washbasins in order to reuse the water which is more precious than gold. Because the settlements need the West Bank’s water more than the Palestinians do.

Make it so that when I sit in a traffic jam I don’t have to think about the vast numbers of cars that are standing at the entrance to Tul Karem while each one is checked by soldiers and dogs because there has been a warning that they’re about to blow up Tul Karem.

Make it so that when my sister urgently rushes to the hospital to give birth and when I rush my husband to the hospital practically with red lights flashing, I don’t have to think about the women giving birth and the heart patients and the wounded people who are stopped at the entrance to Nablus because their vehicle has no permit to enter.

Make it so that when I see a soldier in uniform on the street I do not wonder what he did last night. What house he entered in a “Straw Widow procedure”,* what boy he beat up in the alleys of Hawara because he smiled the wrong way.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Click on URL for the rest real story:

http://www.counterpunch.org/canetti11062008.html

Report this

By sophrosyne, November 7, 2008 at 5:45 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Obama will indeed be under pressure to advance the neo-con agenda.  Remember that neo-cons and Israeli pressure groups forced Obama to take extra-hawkish positions on the Mid East, Israel, Russia with their whispering campaign against him.  That campaign, rumors to the contrary, worked well and obama gave in.  Can he now resist the neo-con temptation?  They know how to manipulate patriotic imagery and “values” very skillfully and they have no more lyalty to the republicans than a stone.  They will quickly migrate to obama if he gives them power, prestige and efficacy.  They got what they wanted from stooges like Bush. McPain and Reagan but have no loyalty but to themselves. They will dump “vales” Republicans and the low tax Republicans and are doing so now.

Report this

By ArthurReader, November 7, 2008 at 5:34 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I have to agree with the first commenter who references the Obama Chief-of-Staff—to quote past news sources: “During the 1991 Gulf War, Emanuel was a civilian volunteer in Israel, rust-proofing brakes on an army base in northern Israel”

Seriously! It’s laughable code, probably CIA or Mossad: he is suddenly in Israel as a “Civilian volunteer”...doing the most important grunt task of “rustproofing brakes”... and so on. That’s what gets you to high political positions.

I’m looking forward to Emmanuel’s continued application of his earlier role in “Clinton neutrality”. To understand the “neutrality”, consider it at work in Hillary’s campaign speech at the AIPAC meeting, beamed around the world. Hillary can specifically recall the names of a few Israeli soldiers (that is, a foreign nation) and how our country has to never forget them and get them out of their “hostage” situation (soldiers in combat are not held hostage like civilians, they are captured).. she is proud to march with their wives in NYC, and so on..She is even incensed that one people and culture has their own name (“nakba”) in their language, signifying the tragedy of their dispersion after 1948.
She sides with a foreign country, on a cultural terminology from an occupied people - as if that is where the President’s interests should be…

Yes, sure. Looking forward to Emmanuel and “to change”...

Report this

By Winston Smith, November 7, 2008 at 4:34 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Uh do they have to plot?  The morning after he was elected, Obama appointed the son of a zionist terrorist as an advisor.  Can you say the next generations of Wolfowitz, Perles and Feiths?

Remember he owes Wall Street backers for that weird infomercial, where he played a more articulate Palin and talked about curbing Russian aggression and building up the military.  (As a side note, Russia, unlike Iran, has nuclear weopens, not smart.)

Well anyway, I suppose the frying pan (Obama) is better than the fire (Mccain).

Didn’t Joe the Plumber say something about how Obama would be the death of Israel.  Well “Joe,” that’s a lovely dream.

Report this

By rylly, November 7, 2008 at 4:31 pm #

There is not a chance that Obama will carry on with any of Bush’s insanity in the world.  He knew Bush was wrong from the start and has had years to think of what he will do to remedy the mess.
I have great faith that the Isreal-Palestinian conflict will be a resolved issue in his first term.  He is a reconciler and will not rest until the right thing is done.
I expect great changes in foreign policy and the neo-cons will be frustrated in every attempt to manipulate or control any of Obama’s administration.
The people are behind this change and we won’t rest or let the neocons stand in our way.

Report this

By nrobi, November 7, 2008 at 3:19 pm #

Please, please, please oh tell me, that President-elect Barack Obama, will not follow in the path of the neo-conservative, ideological, dunderheads of the shrub’s administration.
If there is anything we, the people, do not need it is the foreign policy failures and complete lack of knowledge that the neo-cons embraced.
Bringing democracy to the world, through interventionist means, whether for good or ill, at the end of the barrel of a weapon, is not the brightest idea in the world. The dim bulbs who brought you this idea, are the same dim bulbs who now should be prosecuted for crimes against humanity, war crimes and crimes against this nation.
I am of the firm belief, that if given the chance the World Courts of Justice should have the opportunity to show the world the complete idiocy of the neo-cons world view.
We, the American people are now faced with the challenge of repairing all of the alliances built up since WWII and fostered through careful and thoughtful diplomacy.
Should President-elect Barack Obama, choose to follow these same idiotic and dunderheaded ideological diplomatic errors, then we as a nation are truly doomed to lie on the scrap heap of humanity. For no one, will take the US seriously anymore, if this occurs.
I would rather think that though this plot may be real, that Barack Obama, has more than enough sense and acumen in the political arena to craft his own foreign policy and show the world we are not all the same as the shrub and the neo-conservative movement.

Report this

By felicity, November 7, 2008 at 3:10 pm #

I agree with Inherit and Pfaff is stirring an empty pot. 

Bush’s arms policy swept away years of building global control of the worst of weapons and replaced it with bombast.  He either dropped out of or expressed disdain of the Anti-ballistic Missile Treaty, the Biological Weapons Convention and the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.  I look forward to Obama rejoining the world and I’m sure he will - he’s certainly no bombast.

If Russia weren’t such a basket case presently, she’d probably threaten to put missiles in Cuba in retaliation for our missiles in Poland. It’s quite likely that Obama understands and accepts that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction, and he will design foreign policy in keeping with that ancient law.

Report this

By P. T., November 7, 2008 at 2:58 pm #

Republican neo-cons will not be the problem in an Obama administration so much as Bill Clinton’s military humanist crowd (imperialism in the name of human rights)—and, of course, there will be the problem of the omnipresent Zionist lobby.

Report this

By David A., November 7, 2008 at 2:39 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

“It would be like Russia building a new missile system in Mexico, and recruiting allies in Central America.”

Maybe it would be, if you believe the USA was the same as the Soviet Union.

The USA didn’t keep people in other nations behind an Iron Curtain. The USA didn’t install puppet totalitarian governments in Western Europe after WWII. 

The Soviet Union had a 50 year history of doing so.

Eastern Europe still has the threat of the Russian Bear putting a stranglehold on it.

Latin America has no such fear from the USA.

Also, the missile system is designed for reaction against Middle East nations like Iran and not Russia.

Other than all that, yeah, Russia putting a missile system in Mexico would be exactly the same.

Report this

By Doug Tarnopol, November 7, 2008 at 11:13 am #

Whoops—looks like the Comment Title field doesn’t get picked up. My full comment:

“My main problem with this article is the use of the word ‘co-opt.’”

Though the Kool-Aid drinkers have made Obama into their wish fulfillment, he wasn’t the protege of Joe Lieberman for nothing. He’s a hardline, cruise-missile liberal—and not too far from the neocons. Just smarter: he knows that you need to have a nice smile to keep the masses happy while you rule the empire.

Word on the street in NYC: “I’m already disappointed” t-shirts are popping up.

Report this

By Purple Girl, November 7, 2008 at 11:10 am #

For about 50 yrs we have allowed ourselves to be run with only one Objective in mind..OIL.
Why is Russia a threat? Iran? Venezula? Why must we remain in a country in which we have captured and Killed the Tyrannt leader we supposedly went in to dethrone? Why have we allowed the Country that spawn the amjority of Terrorist who attacked US on 9/11 to continue relations with US? Shit Afghanistan was merely College, Not the Early education system for these SOB’s?SA bore and nurtured these Terrorist, who already knew what they wanted to be before heading off to ‘College’! Why Does our Presidents Hug, Kiss and Hold hands with these perpetuators of hate and terrorist attacks?
One answer….Oil. If We are able to return this element back to nothing more than Sludge, Shit will immediately Change.There will be nothing to fight over…Who cares who controls the ME, their resource is worthless.They have wanted US Out and WE have wanted OUT for Decades. I have confidence we can over come this challenge,and They’ll be on Their Own. Beware of What you Wish for M.E., There isn’t much Demand for Sand, or Camels on the World Market. Of course we must also finally admit, Gold, diamonds etc are only shiney Rocks too, thus toppling the ill gotten wealth of their Oil “Royals” Too!
Let’s be honest, If all hell breaks loose, who will be the wealthier man, the Chicken farmer, or the Jeweler? Food vs Rock.
Let’s be the ones producing the ‘Food’ and leave the assholes in the M.E. holding the Rocks and Sludge

Report this

By Doug Tarnopol, November 7, 2008 at 9:47 am #

...is the use of the word, “co-opt.”

Report this

By Sean Maurice Hunt, November 7, 2008 at 9:12 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

If Russia is upset about missile defense near their borders in Poland then we should defuse the situation…the damned things dont work anyway!

Report this

By G.Anderson, November 7, 2008 at 2:24 am #

Of couse the Neo Con’s want to keep their agenda going.

They are dangerous people, and they will do all they can to make sure that Obama fails, even as they congratulate him on his success.

The political struggle to return our government to sanity, will be dificult.

As Paul Krugman said, we have been ruled by monsters. Monsters not men. And monsters will do what monsters will do, they really have no choice.

Report this

By P. T., November 7, 2008 at 2:10 am #

Obama’s undergraduate major was international relations so it is not as if he knows nothing about the subject.  In addition, he lived in Muslim Indonesia and his mother was an anthropologist.

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, November 7, 2008 at 1:00 am #

Pfaff thinks Obama is as mindless as Bush. He’s not. He thinks that without Pfaff’s guidance Obama will be a babe lost in a forest of wolves. He won’t.
Nobody is as smart as the ultra-left-wing pundits…certainly not Obama—to them.  He isn’t. He’s far smarter.
They think Obama is weak-willed and unable to take care of himself—a guy who made it in Chicago politics.  He is very able to take care of himself.
Obama’s not going to appoint a bunch of fantasy-filled super-lefties, so OF COURSE he’s already being attacked by those who still insist Nader is the best man for the job…and that he actually won.

Report this

By Folktruther, November 7, 2008 at 12:29 am #

Obiden has already chosen by his appointments.  He will follow the Bushite way of military imperialism, from a positiion of incrreasing weakness as the US world power declines.

Indeed, in many instances he is to the right of Bush-Cheney.

Report this

By Bboy56, November 7, 2008 at 12:23 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Yes, that is also why Europeans are cheering the victory so vehimently also. US foreign policy, particularly the MISSLE DEFENSE SHIELD, and going back on promises not to incorporate MORE Warsaw Pact nations into NATO is essential to making any kind of progress on detante’. Yes it’s time to negotiate Nuclear Arms reductions again and a commitment to stop military expansionism and go back to European soil. Not a neo-con priority at this or any time. We don’t need to be meddling in Mid-East affairs and get it right here at home first. Let China melt down in the region for a change. That would really make the neo’s heads spin!

Report this

By Fahrenheit 451, November 7, 2008 at 12:11 am #

The election of Obama is significant; but one must understand that significance for what it is.  As far as the body politic, I think we haven’t learned a thing.  Fooled again.  I think we’ll never learn and have no idea of the real problem.  Possibly Tao Walker is the only one who sees.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2010 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.