May 23, 2013
Only One Good Path for the Democrats: Go Big
Posted on Nov 6, 2008
By David Sirota
“What do we do now?”
That’s the question Bill McKay ponders in the classic movie “The Candidate” after he wins office promising “a better way.” America will now ask Democrats the same haunting query following the historic election.
These are heady times for the party of Jefferson, Roosevelt and now Obama. Only a few years ago, Democrats were almost relegated to permanent minority status by a “Mission Accomplished” sign and a flight suit. But since President Bush’s 2004 re-election, they have gained at least 50 House seats, 12 Senate seats, seven state legislatures and seven governorships. As Republicans used “socialism” attacks to make the national campaign race a referendum on conservatism, Democrats also registered their biggest presidential triumph since 1964.
So, while the president-elect talks of forming a bipartisan Cabinet, his victory wasn’t the public’s cry for milquetoast government-by-blue-ribbon-commission. As the Center for Community Change’s Deepak Bhargava says, Obama’s win was an ideological mandate presenting “an opening for transformational, progressive change.”
Maximizing this opportunity will rely on Democrats understanding the parable from Spiderman comics—the one about great power coming with “great responsibility.” In politics, that latter phrase is a euphemism for high expectations.
That was always 2008’s theme. Amid lipsticked pigs, Joe the Plumber and Super Bowl-size candidate events, the election became a choice between continued conservative rule and a progressive agenda as far-reaching as the current crises. And as a defeated John McCain said, “The American people have spoken, and they have spoken clearly.”
To meet the challenge, Democrats have to abandon their worst habits.
They must, for instance, acknowledge their progressive mandate, rather than denying it like Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) did on Tuesday. “This is not a mandate for a political party or an ideology,” he fearfully told reporters.
Democrats should also retire the Innocent Bystander Fable—the myth about being powerless onlookers. Democrats first cited this fable as reason the Iraq war continued during their congressional majority—expecting the country to forget that Congress can halt war funding. Today, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) says “there’s not much we can do” to amend the sputtering bank bailout. In 2009, such mendacity will metastasize from banal dishonesty into grist for scathing comedy-show punch lines.
Democrats need to discard other lies, too—especially those about Bill Clinton. To hear pundits tell it, Clinton’s first-term pitfalls underscore why the next administration should avoid “governing in a way that is, or seems, skewed to the left,” as The Washington Post’s Ruth Marcus most recently asserted. History, of course, proves the opposite. Recounting Clinton’s early years to Politico.com, a lobbyist correctly noted that the new president didn’t move left—he pushed conservative policies like NAFTA, thereby demoralizing his base and helping Republicans take Congress.
Obama rose on a promise to eschew those triangulations—and he won because America realized that “invertebracy” and sail trimming will not solve problems. Voters rejected Clinton-style incrementalism in the primary, then scorned conservatism in the general election, meaning Democrats’ best response to Bill McKay’s “what do we do now?” question is a two-word answer: Go big.
That is not merely the better way—it is the only way.
David Sirota is a best-selling author whose newest book, “The Uprising,” was released in June. He is a fellow at the Campaign for America’s Future and a board member of the Progressive States Network, both nonpartisan organizations. His blog is at www.credoaction.com/sirota.
© 2008 Creators Syndicate Inc.
New and Improved Comments