LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
November 21, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Intelligentsia Against Intelligence

Lipstick on a Rogue

The Afghanistan Speech Obama Should Give (but Won't)

Throw the Money Changers Out of the Temple

Battlefield in the War of Ideas

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
Enough G-2 Talk Already
Despite Subsidies, Class Sizes Rise in California Schools

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
 * NEW! * Freedom’s Fight: Part II

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar more items

 
Reports

Homeland Security Pays Dividends for Alaska

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Oct 31, 2008
AP photo / Al Grillo

A crowd at a restaurant in Wasilla cheers during the September telecast of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin accepting the Republican nomination for vice president.

This story was reported by G.W. Schulz of the Center for Investigative Reporting.

Despite its go-it-alone spirit, sparsely populated Alaska is one of the greatest per-capita beneficiaries of federal funding among the 50 states. A major portion of those U.S. taxpayer dollars in recent years has come from large infusions of homeland security grants and appropriations handed out to the state since the 9/11 attacks.

Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin’s hometown of Wasilla, where she was mayor from 1996 to 2002, has benefited immensely from the anti-terrorism bonanza. Wasilla, with a population of 7,028, has acquired a surveillance system for its water wells, a 150-foot-tall communications tower that altered the city’s landscape, a half-million-dollar mobile command vehicle with off-road capabilities and more.

According to an analysis of federal spending figures and additional records obtained by the Center for Investigative Reporting from the state of Alaska through open-government laws:

• Between 2002 and 2006, Alaska received at least $66.6 million from the most common preparedness grants distributed by the Department of Homeland Security, putting the state behind only three others in per-capita spending: Vice President Dick Cheney’s home state of Wyoming, Vermont and North Dakota. The amount is about $100 per Alaskan, more than half the per-capita figure for the state of New York and $70 more than for each California resident.

Advertisement

• Between 2003 and 2007, Wasilla received at least $1.4 million in homeland security grants, including $987,550 from the assistance to firefighters grant program, for which fire departments apply to the Federal Emergency Management Agency on their own. Alaska received $18.2 million from the assistance to firefighters program in 2002-2008 on top of what it had already won in other homeland security grants. 

• Using $244,500 in funding from the 2005 grant cycle, Wasilla constructed a 100-foot-tall communications tower for its small police force. An additional $148,000 came during 2007, to improve law enforcement communications and to raise the new tower 50 feet after the city realized the one it built wasn’t tall enough.

The borough that surrounds Wasilla—Alaska’s equivalent of a county jurisdiction—has received at least $2.8 million in grants from the Homeland Security Department over the last five years. The Matanuska-Susitna Borough, or Mat-Su as locals call it, spent nearly $70,000 to install security equipment at two fire stations in Wasilla and also acquired a $410,000 mobile command communications vehicle outfitted with a conference room and an incinerator toilet. It’s kept in Wasilla, as is a $427,000 hazardous materials truck the borough purchased; the vehicle contains a computer program for plotting potentially deadly chemical plumes.

Wasilla has further enjoyed a windfall of federal money for other public safety purposes outside of Homeland Security Department grants. That amount is more than $5 million since 2006 alone, mostly from earmarks.

Not everyone in Wasilla welcomes the federal handouts. Steve Stoll, a land surveyor and City Hall gadfly in Wasilla, ran for mayor in 2005, arguing that the city shouldn’t too quickly grab at every dollar in homeland security assistance that becomes available.

“So many times I’ve heard the expression, ‘If we don’t take it, someone else will,’ ” Stoll, who lost the election, said in an interview with CIR. “I just don’t subscribe to that at all. I think it’s a totally wrong way to run government.”

The largely conservative and independent voters of Alaska exhibit a dual personality when it comes to taxation. Opposing greater local sales and property taxes is a reliable strategy for politicians seeking to win elections. But Alaska has profited from the billions of dollars in grants federal lawmakers began distributing to local governments for disaster preparedness after 9/11. Since the attacks, Alaska’s delegation has also sought lucrative congressional earmarks for large state projects, emphasizing in each any veneer of national security.

Palin first became mayor of Wasilla in 1996 after claiming that her opponent had a “tax-and-spend mentality” because he sought a 2 percent sales tax to fix the city’s roads and sewer system. She defeated former Alaska Gov. Frank Murkowski in 2006 after promising voters she would sell a $2-million publicly owned passenger jet he used to travel on state business. Murkowski originally attempted to buy the plane with homeland security money; the federal government said no.

With the state’s receipt of federal subsidies continuing apace, Palin boosted her popularity as governor earlier this year by handing out a $1,200 energy rebate to Alaskans in addition to the $2,069 payment each already received from an oil royalty fund paid into by energy producers. 

“Of course we believe ourselves to be self-reliant but are far more reliant on federal spending and oil taxes, which pay for most of state government expenses, than any other state,” said Gerald McBeath, a political science professor at the University of Alaska Fairbanks. “That’s a contradiction leading to a good deal of ambivalence in our attitudes toward government.”

Voters in Anchorage, the state’s most populous city, rejected $117 million worth of local bond measures that had seemed like a sure thing during a 2006 election after mayoral candidate Jack Frost fiercely campaigned in opposition to property taxes. The measures included $98 million for schools and $13 million more for “homeland security” improvements ranging from the replacement of ambulances to radio communications upgrades. Frost lost.

Alaskans aren’t as swift to turn away federal grants. Wasilla used 2003 homeland security funds of $46,000 to place surveillance cameras at its sewage treatment plant and water supply facilities. 


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By hippy pam, November 4, 2008 at 6:28 pm #

And I sure hope their “STAR” candidate gets to return to Alaska..as..A LOSER…........

Report this

By Clash, November 1, 2008 at 6:17 pm #

It is really good to know that we have sent so much money to Alaska from the home land security fund, while armed mexican sodiers cross the border in military vehicles with mounted machine guns protecting drug traffickers and doing who knows what in john mcains home stae of Arizona. So much for the war on drugs and home land security.Just another good joke from the people who brought you the fall of America.

Report this

By Dr. Knowitall, PhD, PhD, October 31, 2008 at 8:06 pm #

Outraged:

President Sarah Palin

Report this

By Outraged, October 31, 2008 at 7:40 pm #

Since it is Halloween, I thought I say something REALLY scary…..

**** VICE-PRESIDENT SARAH PALIN ****

Report this

By davidperi, October 31, 2008 at 4:18 pm #

Michael Moore on http://www.democracynow.org said later in his 1 hr interview with Amy that if that ain´t socialism what is…commenting on how every Alaskan received money from tax revenues.  The Republicans really have a twisted view on socialism.

Report this

By LoisO, October 31, 2008 at 2:57 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I guess Palin doesn’t consider it Socialism if HER constituents benefit from this re-distribution of wealth.

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, October 31, 2008 at 1:11 pm #

Cichawoda, October 31 at 7:52 am #

I live in a donor state (puts in more dollars into the Fed than it gets out) and I think the beggar states suck. I am also surprised that this is not more of an issue with donor state voters. Alaskans, most of the Bible belt states live off of the larges of the states they hate. It’s time to ask for our money back.
***************************************

Ask??  Heck, DEMAND our money back! Since Bush was a big practitioner of the “spoils system” I think we should take it back—let EVERY state get as much back from the feds as it puts in. And if there’s less, divide the burden equally.  So, nobody in Alabama or Alaska should be seeing $1.80 to $2.00 for every dollar they are taxed, and we in NJ should get back $1 for every $1 we send, not $0.65!

Report this

By Hulk2008, October 31, 2008 at 1:07 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Since this is Halloween, it’s ironic that I recently found an article describing a study about attitudes among liberals and conservatives.  Turns out that liberals tend to be less “afraid” overall - more trusting, sometimes almost to the point of being too trusting.  Conservatives go to the other extreme - fearing all things real and imagined even when unwarranted.  Just look at the “base” that shows up at the campaign rallies:  the liberal Dems all want their rallies to be love-ins while the Repubs use all kinds of divisive hate-filled diatribes.  To our dismay, the last 8 years (and maybe beyond) have been a crescendo of increasing division.  The neo-cons have been able to play out, at taxpayer expense and at the expense of our personal freedoms, the building of overwhelming offensive military capability.  They are pleased to be able to swat a gnat with a megaton warhead.  And they seem to never be satisfied with mere “overwhelming”  - they strive to go beyond. 
    Let’s hope the pendulum will begin to swing the other way ..... and with luck, will not swing past the middle.  Could be the only “silver lining” in the economic storm clouds.

Report this

By ThisIsNotADrill, October 31, 2008 at 12:44 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

The biggest reason that idiots have been installed in Alaska is because of HAARP.  Soon-to-be-former Sen. Stevens and Gov. Palin.  (How low can they go.)  Anyone with an inkling of IQ would cause problems for HAARP. Also other similar facilities around the world. So of course money is getting pumped into Alaska. It’s got the single biggest WMD on the planet.


http://blog.wired.com/defense/2007/12/secret-document.html
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/12/305741.shtml
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haarp

Report this

By Cichawoda, October 31, 2008 at 11:52 am #

I live in a donor state (puts in more dollars into the Fed than it gets out) and I think the beggar states suck. I am also surprised that this is not more of an issue with donor state voters. Alaskans, most of the Bible belt states live off of the larges of the states they hate. It’s time to ask for our money back.

Report this

By Rodger lemonde, October 31, 2008 at 11:32 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

You betcha! wink wink

Report this

By Groovesmoothly, October 31, 2008 at 11:04 am #

I’m pretty sure that is a small necessity to have a HAZ-MAT team/truck when you are the meth capital of the great white tundra. Several years ago in Dallas a neighbor got busted growing some weed. The DEA thought it was a meth lab they were busting and they had a full HAZ-MAT team brought in from Oklahoma in case it blew-up. In the end the only thing that blew-up was their case due to faulty warrants and the Feds bailing when they only found 8 plants in a closet.

Report this

By Big Wes, October 31, 2008 at 9:31 am #

In the beginning of the DHS grant process, the State Homeland Security Grant program allocated money to each state based upon a formula.  This money was administered by the states and passed along to local jurisdiction through various methods (formula or competitive grants).  There are also a number of “competitive” grant programs sponsored by DHS and FEMA.  I think these are where the rural states had an “unfair” advantage against their urban counterparts.

I’m a grant writer in a rural state and I’ve worked with many of the DHS-funded grant programs.  I see these programs as a way of “compensating” for years of underfunding of public safety agencies in rural areas.  Emergency services were never really a priority until 9/11 and then the federal and state governments realized most communities were woefully equipped and prepared.  Suddenly, these DHS grants open up and small communities in the middle of nowhere are getting hundreds of thousands of dollars for equipment because they were pitifully equipped and had no real means of remedying this disparity with local funds.  The communities I work with made wise investments in things like Enhanced 911, but the way the guidelines were written and the money was being distributed, there was a huge potential for money to be thrown awayon crap projects.

Of course politics plays a huge role in the process as well.  Politics influenced the writing of the guidelines that governed the distribution of funds.  If a rural state had influential federal representatives, it would get Homeland Security dollars.  As an insider into the process, I can say that in the area where I work, the money was used to make enhancements to public safety that most communities needed, but could not afford.  In 2006, the county where I live lacked enhanced 911, so if you called 911 and could not speak to dispatcher, you were screwed.  I feel safer know that if I dial 911, the dispatchers now have access to premises information via a computer display.  I think projects like this are worthy of the investments. Whether Podunkville needs four wheelers and mobile command centers with every bell and whistle is debatable.

Report this

By Purple Girl, October 31, 2008 at 8:54 am #

Reason this admin colluded with the Georgian Pres to spark a conflict? Why McCain has their Lobbyist on staff as a ‘campaign’ advisor?
Reason the Picked this obscure no name as VP who already has delusions of granduer?
Of course how many of US actually Knew who Cheney was until he slitered out from under his shadowy rock. I’d never noticed him, and I have been accutely aware of a trend towards WW3 since Reagan.
No wonder they are claiming ‘Foreign Policy’ experience they have been gearing her stae up for a launch for the Next big War.
No wonder she ‘KNOWS’ we are no on the count Down to Armegeddon, she’s been intrical in it’s build up.
I often say I am an atheist, one for convenience not to have to explain my philosophy, but also to make it clear I do NOT beleive in their dogma they equate to their ‘God’. But in a weird way I am almost wishful their so called ‘Judgement day’ is at hand, but Not by Their ‘God’. I relish the idea that it is What will deem them Unworthy and Damned. Or at least I know I will not be getting on the same ‘bus’ as them thus I will not have to spend eternity with them- a bonus even if I were Hell bound.

Report this

By Dr. Knowitall, PhD, PhD, October 31, 2008 at 7:24 am #

More and more, I’m believing that if legislation is going to be passed to make it possible for municipalities and individuals to dip into the Federal treasury and people don’t take advantage of it, they have little justification in complaining about banks dipping into the Fed. treasury (our money) for a trillion buck lollipop or the DOD doing the same. 

That’s why I fully support earmarks and pork.  As long as it’s there, and our gov. wants to be altruistic, take advantage.  If you don’t like it that this state or that city got a 1/2 million for one project or another, call your rep and ask him/her “when the hell are you going to get us something?”  This is America, for god’s sake.  Or, if you’re a moral-type person, call him/her and give ‘em hell for being so free with your hard-earned tax money.  And then, grovel.

S.P. can help assure her re-election as Alaska Gov. by promising that it’s her goal to not only get more federal pork for Alaska, but to bring home the whole damn pig. 

Like the guy said, if we don’t take it, someone else will.  Spread the Wealth.  Yea, socialism.

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, October 31, 2008 at 7:17 am #

Red states love to talk about cutting out government programs but they are the first in line for EVERYTHING they can get.

Most red states are being subsidized by us blue staters: For every dollar we send the Feds in NJ, they spend about 65 cents in NJ.  For every dollar Alaska sends the Feds, THEY get $1.82.  In red state after red state this is true.

They are happy to be rugged independents and spit at coastal liberals as “lib’rals” and “socialists” but they’d be Third World without us!

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.