|
|
May 23, 2013
|
|
The McCain Ship Drifts in a TidePosted on Oct 27, 2008Probably, John McCain and Sarah Palin will lose this election. Certainly, they deserve to. With a campaign designed more to play on insecurities than promote ideas, McCain and Palin have practically framed Barack Obama’s “closing argument” for him. “The question in this election is not ‘Are you better off than you were four years ago?’ ” Obama told an audience Monday in Canton, Ohio. “We know the answer to that. The real question is ‘Will this country be better off four years from now?’ ” The Republicans don’t even try to formulate an answer, and with Obama’s lead growing by the day, it’s hard to imagine what might turn things around. An “October surprise” international incident might end up working against McCain rather than for him, given his all-over-the-map reaction to the financial crisis. The vaunted Republican get-out-the-vote machine looks almost puny beside Obama’s next-generation juggernaut. There’s always race, of course, and we can’t say with certainty whether there’s some huge, hidden racist vote out there just waiting to emerge next Tuesday. My hunch is that race is already factored into the poll numbers—that it has already been “discounted by the market,” to use the financial jargon that’s so fashionable these days. I believe that race is a subtext of Republican attack words such as dangerous or socialist, and that it’s the real target of the attempt to paint Obama as unknown, mysterious, exotic and somehow alien. My guess is that voters who are responsive to this kind of coded appeal have already responded. So we’re not likely to see some kind of deus ex machina salvation for McCain, Palin and their down-ticket allies, and that’s as it should be. It’s not just that they have run a weirdly erratic campaign, bitingly sarcastic one minute, earnestly serious the next, uncertain whether to present McCain as a serious, experienced statesman or a hypercaffeinated, overeager publicist for Joe the Plumber. It’s not just that Palin—and let’s be honest—should never have been allowed anywhere near the ticket, and certainly not anywhere near those frocks from Saks and Neiman Marcus. Advertisement That’s a shame. McCain’s repeated references to maverick have drained all meaning from the word, but it’s true that he’s an iconoclast with little reverence for Republican orthodoxy. Why he chose, in an election that was always going to be decided by independents and Reagan Democrats, to campaign on a platform of slavish devotion to Republican orthodoxy is beyond me. On the economy, McCain offers some relief for homeowners facing foreclosure, but only within a context of classic Republican trickle-down economics. He wants to lower taxes on business and rejects Obama’s plan—raise income taxes for the wealthy and lower them for the middle class—as rampant socialism. If you set aside the incendiary rhetoric about class warfare that McCain and Palin have been tossing around, basically what they propose is staying the course that brought us to this point of global crisis. McCain makes much of wanting to get rid of congressional earmarks; everybody wants to get rid of earmarks, except the one that benefits my community or my industry. He proposes an across-the-board spending freeze—during a recession?—and then, in the next breath, proposes new spending. He overestimates the voters’ tolerance for incoherence. On foreign policy, once the centerpiece of McCain’s campaign but now mostly an afterthought, McCain promises “victory” in Iraq and Afghanistan without telling war-weary voters how much more time, money or blood he would spend. In choosing a running mate, McCain made absolute mockery of his “country first” slogan and instead put politics above all other considerations. It suffices to note that the Anchorage Daily News—the biggest newspaper in Palin’s state—endorsed Obama, saying that Palin was being stretched “beyond her range” and that she clearly is not ready to be “one 72-year-old heartbeat from the leadership of the free world.” It’s hard to imagine that a McCain presidency could possibly be as scattered, irresponsible, uninspiring and intellectually bankrupt as the McCain campaign. It’s even harder to imagine that Americans, at this crucial juncture, will take that risk. New and Improved CommentsIf you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy. |
By Sepharad, October 30, 2008 at 12:38 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Catherine,
We should be so lucky. Unfortunately, according to a huge spread in yesterday’s NYTimes campaign section, whether McCain/Palin win or lose the GOP wants HER to stay and be groomed for greater things to come. It was so nauseating that I kept wanting to stop reading but as usual curiosity kept me from turning the page. The gist of it was she’s new, she’s fresh, she’s ambitious, she learns quickly and (as William Kristol said recently) “Well just LOOK at her.”
I’m not as confident as some posting here that if Palin ran for President she’d produce the greatest Democratic landslide in history. The fact that she is on the ticket at all, that people respond to her positively (some Republicans, anyway) and that there actually are people who admire her “arc of learning” all make me feel that I’ve greatly overestimated the intelligence of our people. But one battle at a time; gotta get this election done first.
Report thisBy James M. Martin, October 29, 2008 at 4:36 pm Link to this comment
Sarah Palin’s announcement that she is “in national politics to stay” surely spells the end of the GOP brand. If the party nominates her in ‘12, the landslide for the Dems will be even greater than this time around. She speaks only to a small base of diehard theocratic evangelicals whose insane ideas are inimical to everything that makes this country great, and especially the separation of powers doctrine, the First Amendment, and the doctrine of separation of church and state. Palin is a Dangerous Lunatic. If I were a believer, I’d say God help us if she gets into the White House.
Report thisBy hippy pam, October 29, 2008 at 11:52 am Link to this comment
My friend-Victor-lives in the U.P. of MICHIGAN called me today to give me a heads up from the Michigan Intertribal Council.Seems “ole ya-betcha” has tried to take away NATIVE FISHING AND HUNTING RIGHTS up in “her great state of Alaska”.We REALLY NEED TO WATCH THIS ONE…...
Report thisBy PaulMagillSmith, October 29, 2008 at 9:51 am Link to this comment
I have been enjoying your rational, realistic, well thought out comments on Countdown w/Keith Olberman. Keep them coming.
Report thisBy Paul_GA, October 29, 2008 at 5:57 am Link to this comment
I fear they may be, Catherine. Badly-educated, poorly-informed people tend to elect badly educated, poorly-informed leaders in this country.
Report thisBy ED THE BUSINESS OWNER, October 29, 2008 at 5:55 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Sarah Palin says that Barack Obama is not being candid with the American public
regarding taxes and associations. But exactly how straight is Sarah Palin being about
those subjects herself? Judge for yourself.
As Governor of Alaska Sarah Palin had this to say in Sept 2008:
“Alaska - we’re set up unlike other states in the union…collectively
Alaskans own the resources. So we SHARE IN THE WEALTH when the
development of these resources occur.”
As Governor of Alaska Sarah Palin associated with the radical Alaskan Independence Party, of which her husband Todd was recently a member of for over half a decade, speaking at a conference
in early 2008.
Alaskan Independence from what you might ask?
Alaskan Independence from the U.S.A!!!!
Where I come from that is called treason.
A quote from Joe Vogel, leader of the Alaskan Independence Party:
“I am an Alaskan, NOT an American. I have no use for America or any of her damned institutions.”
VOTE FOR DEMOCRACY NOT A REPUBLIC
Report thisUSA not THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF USA
By Catherine, October 28, 2008 at 7:34 pm Link to this comment
Purple Girl…MAC IS the Emperor and Palin is the fisherman’s wife who lived in a hut but got a magic fish to grant her every wish…until finally the fish got tired of her greed and sent her back to the hut, where she “lives to this very day.” The Emperor was finally “exposed,” too. When we think about it, McCain is actually campaigning only for himself and those like him…the “let them eat cake” society. He’s so transparent and Palin is so far out of her league BUT they do appeal to those who have very little wealth, too. THAT I cannot fathom. In my area, I see McCain/Palin signs in the yards of some of the poorest homes and streets. What is it with these people? Are they so braindead?
Report thisBy Paul_GA, October 28, 2008 at 7:10 pm Link to this comment
Tokind, you should not wish something like incarceration in re-education camps on anyone—not even your worst enemy.
Report thisBy tokind, October 28, 2008 at 4:13 pm Link to this comment
If we are going to experiment with socialism, let’s not forget the re-education camps for those who voted to re-elect George W. Bush.
Report thisBy Chris Horton, October 28, 2008 at 3:20 pm Link to this comment
This is no time to let up or relax - between dirty tricks, an all-out fear campaign, a possible October surprise, voter suppression and rigged elections, this snake can still bite - but it’s beginning to look like there could be be a huge Democratic win on Nov. 4. Will that merely launch more centrist, triangulating politicians into office, or will it have lasting consequences? That will turn in part on how we work to keep together and build on the huge movements that have formed around the Obama campaign and other races.
Hundreds of thousands of campaign workers and volunteers are starting to think about what a victory would mean, what to do next. Now is the moment to start talking with them about building grass-roots movements to organize and advocate for a progressive agenda on an ongoing basis.
Even in victory, the end of a political campaign can be painful. The excitement, the camaraderie, the dreaming and planning together suddenly halts. There’s a celebration party, hugs and handshakes, promises to stay in touch and keep the flame alive, and then everyone goes home. But the need to keep the campaign movements alive this time is urgent and widely felt.
Even Obama has said that this is just the opening round of the battle for his agenda, and that holds doubly true for progressives - aware as we are of his ties and obligations to the corporate rich and his dangerous proposals for military escalation. We all know that the lobbyists never sleep. Will the campaigners go home and leave the field to them? How, they are wondering, can they go on affecting events after the election? How can they keep those they are electing from being turned?
Thus it is foreseeable that thousands will want to keep their campaigns together, continue to build on them and stay involved in shaping the direction of the country. Perhaps the Obama campaign will attempt to capitalize on this. But the movement must be bottom-up, controlled by its base and sufficiently independent of the national power centers to be able to represent the people.
Such movements, including DemocracyForAmerica.com (DFA), have emerged from past campaigns. PDA (Progressive Democrats of America), however, is particularly well positioned to keep alive and channel the energy coming out of this year’s campaigns. Founded by activists from the 50-state Kucinich Campaign of 2004, it aligns with the Congressional Progressive Caucus. Caucus members John Conyers, Jr., Maxine Waters and Barbara Lee among others sit on its Board, and it played a key role in the stunning electoral victory of November 2006.
PDA has been active in the struggles against vote fraud, for ending the wars and occupations and bringing the troops home, and for impeaching Bush, for single-payer health care, against bailing out the bankers and for a response to the economic crisis that focuses on investing in a sustainable future and keeping people in their homes and working. It’s “inside-outside strategy” - working inside the Democratic Party to return it to its roots as the party of the working people, and outside in movements for peace and justice - is reflected in the presence on its Board of leaders from a broad array of movements, from Medea Benjamin of Global Exchange to Jodie Evans of CODEPINK and Rev. Lennox Yearwood, Jr. of the Hip-Hop Nation.
PDA now has over 200 local chapters, and its goal is an active chapter in each of the 435 Congressional Districts. Working at the local level with Greens, Netroots groups, labor and communty groups it has a vital part to play in organizing - neighborhood by neighborhood, block by block - to restore democracy to America.
In any case, whether we join with people from the Democratic campaigns in building PDA or in some other form, we cannot just stand by while they call it a day and drop out. What happens over the next four years will be shaped by the leadership we give now!
Report thisBy JOE THE PLUMBER, October 28, 2008 at 2:07 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
10-28-08
Beijing, China
Unassociated Fictional Press
The Government of The Peoples Republic of China has unanimously
endorsed McCain/Palin for President of the United States.
“They are our kind of leaders!” says a Government spokesperson.
“They understand that business and the government should be in control,
not the silly workers, or ‘people’ as they sometimes call themselves.
Also, we understand the Republic concept. It is Democracy we find
distasteful.”
A leading General, who wished to remain anonymous, had this to say
about President McCain: “We planted many post-hypnotic suggestions
in our former P.O.W.‘s mind and we are beside ourselves with
anticipation at having the opportunity to trigger them and have control
of the white house without even having to wage a war…”
“And if that fails,” a second anonymous official pipes in “it’s not like
George W. Bush did not already sell it to us anyway.”
Report thisP.S. We sure hope that Sarah Palin and her corrupt comrade Ted Stevens dream of
a free Alaska comes true someday so we can do serious business.
By suzannemiller, October 28, 2008 at 1:49 pm Link to this comment
AMERICAN VOTERS NEED TO GOOGLE “PNAC AND JOHN MCCAIN”
Report thisBEFORE IT’S TOO LATE. NOT ONLY WAS JOHN MCCAIN A PART
OF THIS DANGEROUS “PROJECT” BUT SOME OF THE OTHER PLANNERS OF THIS ARE PART OF THE MCCAIN 08 CAMPAIGN!
By Purple Girl, October 28, 2008 at 12:42 pm Link to this comment
Mac’s Speech and doctirnes ONLY make sense if you are in the ‘upper balcony’ (Lennon- don’t clap just rattle your jewels).
Report thisWas it ZERO times he mentioned the Middle class in any of those debates?
Does he not realize that people have come to KNOW Trickle Down is akin to Feudalism? So socialism sounds pretty good to US!
Mac is playing to the Emperor and his Court, he is not talking to US. Everytime he says he’ll cut Capitol Gains taxes I nearly piss myself…How many average Working class people have any Capitol to get ‘Gains’ from, so tax breaks are Mute.What a dumb SOB, they don’t have those assets, so they have NO idea what you are Talking about!But again Mac doesn’t care, because he is not Talking to US.
Seems Mac’s Audiences are starting to pick up this ‘Talking above their heads’ BS and his numbers plummeting reflect the miniscule demographics he is performing for.
By LJ in MD, October 28, 2008 at 9:52 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
This country is on fire and the only one trying to put it out is Barack Obama. MkKKain and Palin are clearly trying to keep Obama from “kicking down the door” to get to the blaze. Mkkain has no interest in fighting the fire himself, he likes how warm it is and all the pretty colors. So, he will trip, kick, and distract, whatever necessary to thwart Obama. Palin would rather see US all burn to the ground before yielding any of her dogma to the facts.
Report thisIf you don’t want to help fight the fire, or have no idea how, please just stand aside and let those that are brave enough at least give it a try.
By Real Daddy, October 28, 2008 at 9:07 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
People have a wide variety of reasons - and yes, with Palin’s radical Christian views, she is one heck of a scary lady to be let anywhere near that button with a brand new chant “Armageddon, Baby, Armageddon”.
But in EVERY rally, every speech, every narrative, John is going to ‘fight’ for this, ‘fight’ for that. Now, _he’s_ even going to test the enemies. On the other side, they use words like ‘strive’, ‘compete’, and engage. I’m guessing people are tired of the ‘fight’ mantra. Now I’m no psychologist, but I think Freud and his contemporaries would have a field day with this.
Report thisBy R Green, October 28, 2008 at 8:24 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
You are going to lose free speech if you are white:
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-palineffigy28-2008oct28,0,541630.story
You know if that were an effigy of Obama there would be a hate crime charged,
Report thisBy Paul_GA, October 28, 2008 at 7:32 am Link to this comment
Possibly, Big B, McCain has a secret desire to lose and lose big; lose humiliatingly. As much as I’ve come to despise the Repubs, I hope he—and they—have such a horrendous loss, neither will ever recover from it.
Report thisBy Big B, October 28, 2008 at 6:36 am Link to this comment
Instead of following the populist formula that built his political career, being a fiscal conservative, a social moderate, and weary of the gun lobby, poor Mac was forced to cow-tow to the repug old guard. Learn the three G’s(god, guns, and gays) and repeat them often!
Proud Johnny and the repug elite once again went back to the culture war well, only to find it dry as a bone in this year of economic disaster. They failed to realize that when people and the nation are poor, they care less about their petty backward social views than they do of food and housing and energy.
Why were they this stupid in this election year? All they had to do was run a middle of the road, moderate campaign, and they would have actually had a chance in a year when they should have stood no chance. Bush had poisoned the well, but the repugs still stood a chance because of the “blackness” of the other candidate. But alas, they chose the same low road that many victorious repug candidates have traveled in the past, the road of the culture wars for the religious wacko base, and deregulation for the big business uber wealthy. But it looks as though the Reagan dimmocrates, you know, those idiots that fell for the flag sucking act for the last 40 years, have finally grown a brain and realized that without their help, the repug party cannot win a national election. That, after they voted for Nixon, Reagan, Bushes I and II, they realized that the GOP lost their number the morning after.
Yup, proud Johnny forgot that you can no longer just preach to the believers, because they are going to vote for you anyway. While a dimmo moderate may sometimes vote repug, a true repug will never vote for a dimmo. McCain forgot this axiom, and it may coast him an election(well that and a recession, two foreign wars, corruption, gov Sarah) Come to think of it, this idiot is trying to throw this election!
Report this