![]() |
|
||
|
Signs of an Earthquake in OregonPosted on Oct 17, 2008By David Sirota America’s government-by-television means instantly memorable image is everything. Our electoral decisions pivot less on issues and positions than on caricature—Dukakis peering out of a tank, Quayle misspelling potato, Kerry “looking French,” as Republicans claimed. Rare is the iconography that represents deeper substance Until now. As election day approaches, once-safe Republican senators like Elizabeth Dole (N.C.), Mitch McConnell (Ky.) and Norm Coleman (N.M.) are struggling against Democrats who are using their economic conservatism to paint them as elitists. The criticism is working both because of the imminent recession and because these incumbents look the part. To paraphrase an attack on failed presidential candidate Mitt Romney, these pols don’t remind voters of co-workers, but of bosses “who laid them off.” No Republican, though, says aristocrat like Sen. Gordon Smith of Oregon. And no Senate election could more intensely shift economic politics than his state’s. If Kerry looked like a professor at La Sorbonne, then Smith resembles a playboy at the Monte Carlo casino. The son of an Eisenhower administration official and heir to a food processing company, Smith grew up in the ritzy D.C. suburbs and today lives on Bethesda’s aptly named Country Club Road. In a profile entitled “From Profits to Politics,” the state’s largest newspaper described him as a guy who “unabashedly enjoys spending” his millions on Ferraris, mansions and “weekend trips to New York to window shop.” Advertisement This is a well-trod Republican path in swing states—a lockstep conservative record builds strength in GOP strongholds, and occasionally tolerant-sounding but legislatively meaningless rhetoric peels off votes in Democratic bastions. This year, though, Smith is running for re-election against Democrat Jeff Merkley—the son of a sawmill worker who, as Oregon House speaker, made his name cracking down on predatory lenders. More Paul Bunyan than Paul Allen, Merkley is running on his record as an economic populist, airing ads hammering a tuxedo-clad Smith for supporting corporate tax cuts and the recent Wall Street bailout. He aims to flip Smith’s own calculations on their head, betting he can maintain Democratic margins in cities and middle-class suburbs and cut into Republican support in rural and working-class areas. It’s a smart gamble. Political analysts have long berated populism—i.e., pushing financial regulation, progressive taxation and trade reforms—as blue-collar pandering only effective in the industrial Northeast and Midwest. In the Northwest, the conventional wisdom says that while populism may appeal to Oregon’s 70,000 manufacturing and timber workers who lost jobs to foreign competition, it alienates the latte-swilling office workers who comprise the state’s white-collar “new economy.” “When I see his ads in front of a mill that was closed,” said Smith in attacking Merkley’s criticism of free trade, “I wonder what people at Nike think, Intel, Hewlett-Packard, Columbia Sportswear, whose jobs are directly dependent on trade.” Smith hopes Merkley’s pocket-book pitches to historically conservative areas like timber-producing Douglas County will alienate high-tech workers in suburbs like Washington County (often called “Silicon Forest”). But with Merkley surging in the polls, the opposite may be happening. The Great American Class War ravaging the industrial sector is now pillaging the information sector, too. As Intel boasts of outsourcing, HP lays off thousands and Wall Street eviscerates 401(k) plans, a new blue-collar/white-collar solidarity is emerging. That means today, as during the Great Depression, progressive economic arguments increasingly work across cultural, geographic and employment divides, tectonically realigning politics and—potentially—policy. Should Merkley defeat Oregon’s tycoon senator in the heart of the “new economy,” the tremors of that realignment will become a political earthquake. David Sirota is a bestselling author whose newest book, “The Uprising,” was released in June. He is a fellow at the Campaign for America’s Future and a board member of the Progressive States Network—both nonpartisan organizations. His blog is at www.credoaction.com/sirota. ©2008 Creators Syndicate inc. Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By samosamo, October 20, 2008 at 6:30 pm #
By cyrena, October 19 at 10:12 pm #
Thanks and howdy. This is why the government was set up with a set of rules called the constitution for the instructions. Amazing piece of mental handy work those founding fathers went through to craft such a thing to allow all people to live in some kind of peace and harmony for what was even then a large bunch of people that were slobbering at the mouth to get over here to rape this country. At least some of them wanted a sense of decorum. A good source of read is John Meacham’s ‘American Gospel’ which describes the WASP’s real point of settling this new land; lay claim to any and all the natural resources through the religious aspect of settling here.
Report thisSo with that said, I now have started looking on this as why the constitution was drafted as it was. There must have been at the time the equal of corporate elitism that wanted it all and did not want any interference(read as unfettered, open, unregulated, etc…..) in the plundering. Those few astute men must have had a conscience to want to protect what was the infancy of our government. And with the evidence of the british empire’s behavior in their other ‘crown jewels’ of its middle and far eastern empires on their minds, I can only believe that was what our founding fathers were setting up to protect; what they were taking from the indigenous people from the abuses of a corporate world of the time against their money lust. Elitism did not start there by any means but those guys putting the foundation of our government knew about what was capable of and by them and tried to put a leash on them.
But the worm(currently think of the neocon’s think tanks) was in the works and I guess that as long as it took to reach this point is a lesson in tenacity and the failure of eternal vigilance.
By GW=MCHammered, October 20, 2008 at 12:32 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)
Living under the mudroom cloud these two sophomoric candidates conjure wrenches levelheadedness to new lows.
Report thisBy cyrena, October 20, 2008 at 2:12 am #
By samosamo, October 17 at 10:22 am #
The senate and house seats up for election are most likely more important than the presidency. This is where the real balance of government is that can execute its real constitutional authority IF it chooses to do so.
~~~~
Bingo Samosamo. I wish more people were as aware of this very critical point. The Senate and House seats ARE more important than the presidency. It’s been my point all along.
If in fact we want to get back to the general idea of a Constitution, the Congress has to be on board with US, (not the corps) and we need a president that can work with that Congress.
Report thisBy samosamo, October 17, 2008 at 8:00 pm #
By Jim Swanson, October 17 at 2:56 pm
Thanks for your free offer but I will be more than glad to pay for a copy to reward you somewhat for your efforts, plus I do want to read the book.
Report thisBy samosamo, October 17, 2008 at 2:22 pm #
The senate and house seats up for election are most likely more important than the presidency. This is where the real balance of government is that can execute its real constitutional authority IF it chooses to do so.
Report thisAnd what better poster child of personal, political and economic gain from an elected official than this smith person. Are there any of the 7 sins this class act of crap has not possessed and nutured in his ‘trusted’ position the people put him in? I doubt my senators and representative enough to pull the plug against all 3 in november as they are not part of the small group of elected persons that are trying their best to overcome the last 3 decades of pure crap for government, hell, make that the last 180 years.
By nonplussed, October 17, 2008 at 10:39 am #
(Unregistered commenter)
To be fair to Smith, they weren’t just “Some golf clubs”, according to The Oregonian, they were, “Four really vintage golf clubs - including a putter owned by King James IV in 1504.
The same article tells us that Smith has just been “Working too hard” and as a result, his golf game has suffered. I encourage his fellow Oregonians to provide him with the opportunity to sharpen his game.
http://blog.oregonlive.com/mapesonpolitics/2008/03/gordon_smith_says_he_is_missin.html
Report thisBy KISS, October 17, 2008 at 7:46 am #
Also one of Gordon’s problems is the hiring of illegals in his food plant. He of course shifts the blame on to others, one being his wife who is the CEO.
Report thisDavid you forgot to mention the one plus million dollars that Smith paid for some golf clubs. He really knows how to stimulate the economy.
Than there is the small matter of his food plant getting caught in dumping pollutants in the creek that runs along the property. Some poor illegal gets the blame on that one also.