LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
 
January 7, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Blagojevich vs. the Senate

Navel-Gazing in the Grand Old Party

Yukking It Up at the Blago Show

Israeli Voices for Peace

Gauging Obama’s Silence on Gaza

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture
Tragedy Repeats Itself

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
A Mercy

A Mercy

By Toni Morrison
$14.37

more items

 
Reports

McCain Sounds Worse Than He Looks

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Oct 17, 2008

By Eugene Robinson

    Grouchiness, twitchiness and haughtiness didn’t help John McCain in Wednesday’s debate, but what he said hurt him more than how he said it.

    Why did polls and focus groups judge Barack Obama the clear winner of all three presidential debates? For one thing, demeanor and body language do count in these made-for-television encounters. In this area there was no contest: Obama came across as gracious and graceful, while McCain seemed angry and awkward. While McCain’s relentless attacks may have fired up the Republican base, they couldn’t have pleased independents who just wish all the politicians in Washington would stop their constant bickering and get to work.

    But I think McCain lost ground in the debates mainly because of his threadbare ideas and solutions. People didn’t hear John McCain the brave iconoclast; they heard John McCain the doctrinaire conservative Republican, circa 1964.

    Wednesday’s debate had hardly begun when McCain accused Obama of fomenting “class warfare” through his proposed tax policies. When is the last time anyone used such an archaic term to describe the principle, long established in our tax code, that the wealthy ought to pay taxes at a higher rate than the poor? What are the classes that McCain fears Obama will incite? Will the upper-middle class have to barricade its leafy suburbs against marauding middle-class Jacobins from less-leafy suburbs nearby?

    McCain wouldn’t let this point go. Returning far too often to the case of “Joe the plumber”—a man named Joe Wurzelbacher, whom Obama encountered recently in Ohio—McCain charged that Obama’s proposals would raise the man’s taxes. The way McCain put it was that Obama wanted to “take that money from him and spread the wealth around.”

    McCain apparently intended the phrase “spread the wealth,” which Obama had uttered in his conversation with Wurzelbacher, to strike fear in the hearts of right-thinking Americans. But it’s nothing more than an accurate definition of taxation, which most human civilizations have long accepted. I guess McCain was reaching back to the days when the idea of redistributing wealth had socialist connotations, but socialism is dead—except on Wall Street, where a huge chunk of the nation’s financial system is now owned by the federal government.

    The debate audience also heard McCain go after Obama on the “issue” of his associations. Most people probably knew what McCain was talking about when he mentioned William Ayers, the college professor who was a bomb-throwing Weatherman back in the ‘60s when Obama was in grade school; and most people probably scratched their heads or just tuned out when McCain went on about ACORN, the grass-roots community organization.

    What came across, I think, was that on a day when the Dow Jones average fell 733 points, McCain wanted to talk about these obscure topics rather than the precarlous state of the economy.

    When moderator Bob Schieffer turned to health care, McCain turned once again to a familiar figure: “Now, my old buddy, Joe, Joe the plumber, is out there. Now Joe, Sen. Obama’s plan, if you’re a small business and you are able—and your—the guy that sells to you will not have his capital gains tax increase, which Sen. Obama wants, if you’re out there, my friend, and you’ve got employees, and you’ve got kids, if you don’t get—adopt the health care plan that Sen. Obama mandates, he’s going to fine you.”

    At that point, Obama interjected that his plan specifically exempts small businesses from any requirement to either provide health insurance or pay into an insurance pool (which is what McCain refers to as a fine). McCain responded by going back to those dire warnings of wealth-spreading.

    The ugliest moment, by far, came when McCain lit into Obama for voting against a ban on so-called “partial-birth” abortions because it did not specify an exception for cases in which the woman’s life or health was endangered. McCain’s voice oozed sarcasm as he gestured with his fingers to put air quotes around the word health, as if it were nothing but a dodge employed by bloodthirsty baby-killers. I found it chilling, and I’ll bet a lot of pro-choice independents did, too.

    McCain’s words hurt him more than his scowls. It’s not just the man that people have qualms about, it’s what he stands for.

    Eugene Robinson’s e-mail address is eugenerobinson(at)washpost.com.

    © 2008, Washington Post Writers Group

Jump to Comments

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Pegib, October 21, 2008 at 3:41 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

To Cyrena,


This is off target but I was glad to see your mention of working as an AmeriCorp at the local library. I was an AmeriCorp VISTA for 2 years. I was assigned to develop a MENTOR/TUTOR program at a local elementary school, grades K - 3. I am going to serve another year in economic development in a poverty stricken area beginning next week and will go to Lombard IL. in December for more traing.
I believe that you will be VERY pleased with your assignment also. A person can serve up to 3 years. The AmeriCorp program was derived in 1993 by the Clinton administration based on the “JFK Peace Corp” programs once labeled by the Right Wing dictators as “A program for Hippies who did not want to work”.
There are around 75,000 people of all ages doing community service that educates, enriches lives, preserves natural resorces and much to numerous to mention… College students do it in return for a $4750.00 tuition stipend per year for two years as well a monthly living allowence.

It is now a program praised by many including the Right Wingers.

Kudo’s to you for doing this.

Pegib

Report this

By JimM, October 20, 2008 at 7:50 pm #

I still say his undertaker did a shit embalming job.

Report this

By jake3988, October 20, 2008 at 8:46 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

McCain ACTUALLY SAID “caring about the health of woman is a part of the extreme abortion movement”.

On the one hand I was appalled that a human being could actually say that.  And on the other I was happy because I’m sure a whole lot of people saw that and were appalled just like me.

And P.S. Obama’s plan would not raise Joe’s taxes.  It would only raise his taxes if he MADE 250k in a year which being a 250k company would be near impossible to happen during a single year.

Report this

By cyrena, October 19, 2008 at 9:37 pm #

Felicity says this about how Nixon looked,

•  “..Nixon - five-o’clock-shadow, sweat streaming down his face, looked like a cross between Darth Vador and Hannibal Lector..”

I don’t know, since I missed that debate. (couldn’t vote anyway…only in the 3rd or 4th grade at the time) but I think the description is perfect for McCain.

Now mackTN says this about how McCain looked:

•  “McCain looked dead, a painted corpse.”

And, if it wasn’t for the rolling eyeballs and the fidgeting, I would agree. Rolling eyeballs and grimaces from a corpse would pretty much scare the shit out of me. But then, McCain basically DOES scare the shit out of me, and so does his side-kick, Sarah Palin.
nrobi,

I would LOVE to observe a debate between you and unregistered ED, but it’s obvious that Ed will never take you up on the offer.

Thanks for your very informed comments. Always a delight to hear reasoned and logical discourse.

As for the number of Americans who can’t read, I don’t know where he got those statistics from either, but I’m going to find out for you. After the first of the year, I’ll begin (I hope) a community service job teaching adults to read. (An Americore like project, sponsored by our local library system, and I’m excited about it).

But of course those actual statistics aren’t even relevant, since we allow ALL people to vote, whether they know how to read or not, and we know perfectly well that the ability to read does NOT guarantee an informed vote. (I’m sure the majority of those voting for Dick Bush the last two times probably know how to read..doesn’t mean they can think.)

This reminds me of one of the many tales and stories from the campaign trail that a dear friend has shared with me. Her son, (he’s 38 years old) took a leave of absence from his corporate job about 7 months ago, to become more involved in the Obama campaign. She was very proud of him, as I have been. He frequently provides us with stories of some of his experiences, and he shared one about an elderly fellow that he was helping with the process of making his ballot choices recently. (He didn’t say if the fellow couldn’t read, or if his vision was poor, or what the specifics were, besides him being elderly.)

As they went through the choices (measures, propositions, and allthe old guy told him to just make sure he marked the president choice for ‘that colored boy’. Repeated it a few times, according to my friend’s son. And of course my friend’s son explained to the old gent that he would be sure to do exactly that. wink

Report this

By elizabethe, October 19, 2008 at 5:15 pm #

If you judge age by ideals, ability to run with them, and to land on the solid ground of achievement at a very convincing level of meaning what he says when he offers an agenda to put the country on track, Nader is the youngest, but the birthdate calendar says older, but if you look at the proposed agenda, which offers the strongest future with the most growth and best, most likely to succeed wisdom of upholding the U.S. Constitution as entirely valid?

Nader at 74 is the most young in his ideals and achievements showing that he means to run on his ideals.  This time, I am hoping he will win the majority that is due the proper result of a “vote for Nader” to net a President, not party control against public interest, which is what the Democrats and Republicans have tried, and copied each other to the level of cynicism and crass commercialism without any regard for international law and order, or law and order regarding proper use of taxes.

War is not proper use of taxes, and beyond two years is not allowed, and neither is the decision, the Constitution protects a democracy which is supposed to spend taxes on the public services due from the government for the people. 

Because Nader is honorable, he understands proper policy and is able to deliver it with knowledge and wisdom of youthful strength carried forward for himself and for politics to deliver honest votes for majority rule for a government for people, not corruption.

corruption is the product of those who lose their ideals and abandon them with the destruction of everything that matters…Nader has always held the strong sword of invincible ideals. 

His appeal is to those who want what is right and on track, intelligently, with honor and insight, and with the refusal to compromise ideals especially when there is no cause.

There is no reason not to uphold the U.S. Constitution and to use taxes for proper purposes, nor to keep Bush when he should be impeached.  The U.S. Constitution is there for the BENEFIT of us, not the selfish insanity and danger of a President who ignores his duties described and creates his own agendas against everyone’s safety.  Bush is either incompetent or malicious - he is not for world order and has shown complete disdain for proper leadership.

A President who leads with ideals and honor is offering the strength of the youngest “old” that will indeed win the battle of ideals over corruption facing all voters to win with the elected President most able to deliver on youth and the ideals which are protected in the U.S. Constitution’s Office of President.  No war declared, no red ink, both are not allowed.

Nader knows this.

Report this

By Fadel Abdallah, October 18, 2008 at 3:38 pm #

Considering the excessive times Joe-the-Plumber’s name was invoked during the last debate, and further considering the thousands of times the so-called media pundits invoked his name after the debate and as late as Saturday night, October 18, I am inclined to believe that Joe-the-Plumber is the real winner of the debate and the election in general.

Now McCain and Obama, whoever wins the election, should give Joe-the-Plumber the contract to fix the White House plumbing problem, for I happened to believe that the White House plumbing must have gone terribly bad lately that the pipes started to ooze some intoxicants that adversely affect the mental judgment of the White House occupant!

This way Joe-the-Plumber gets to realize his American dream with this hefty contract and the occupant of the White House might be saved the harmful intoxicants! A win-win-situation!

Report this

By mackTN, October 18, 2008 at 11:14 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

All McCain does is attack Obama.  He has no platform to fight for himself except to say that he intends to rid Washington & Wall St of the greedy, corrupt…like who?  Whenever I see a clip of their speeches, it’s about Obama. 

McCain looked dead, a painted corpse.  The few plans he talks about represent the status quo—more tax breaks for corporations, more money for insurers by giving main st $5000 that won’t be sufficient to buy the scams they’ll put out, no regulation necessary because the fault lies with a few greedy people, more wars to the tune of $700 billion a year.

Who in the hell wants to wake up on Nov 5 to a McCain presidency?  I think he sounded stupid—illogical and out of date.  I don’t think he understands the problems facing this country in the same way Bush doesn’t understand them.  Their narrow,provincial, elite perspectives will destroy everyone’s future.

Report this

By felicity, October 18, 2008 at 9:20 am #

Louise

Speaking of performance, I recall the Nixon-Kennedy debate.  Those who heard it on the radio, gave it to Nixon.  Those who saw it on tv gave it to Kennedy.

Nixon - five-o’clock-shadow, sweat streaming down his face, looked like a cross between Darth Vador and Hannibal Lector.  Kennedy - expertly made-up, clean, vigorous, a young Galahad riding forth on his white steed to save the Republic.  (It wasn’t by accident that his reign evoked the image of Camelot.)

Report this

By nrobi, October 18, 2008 at 8:00 am #

To continue, Ed, I would gladly like to have a debate with you on the subject of your choice and as regards the current situation, would be excessively happy to debate you in your choice of forums or forum.
It would give me great pleasure to show you that the people of America are not as you think, uninformed and all escapist, with a penchant for unreadable or pop-culture literature.
Should you choose to do so, please let me know when and in what forum you would like to continue this debate, for I am ready, willing and able to soundly defeat you with facts and not with emotions or ad hominem attacks on your character.
Ed, it is without doubt, that you sir, as stated before are an ex-Grand Orgy Party member, has had to switch affiliations, to the Libertarian Party. The stated reason being, that John McCain, chose as his running mate the dumbest bunny on the planet and is now in danger of losing any of the marbles that he had left. In which case, Ms.Palin, would then be the president, to the detriment of the whole planet and this countries standing in all the world.
I sir, am surprised that, you have not made the switch to the Democratic Party, for they through a rigorous process, called rightly the primaries, have chosen the next president of the U.S.
I loathe the day, that a person, John McCain, chose to stick his head in the sand and associate with the lunatic fringe of the far right wing christian lunatics of the Grand Orgy Party.
Mr. McCain, degraded himself, by seeking the “anointing” of this group of people, and by choosing Sarah Palin, finished the job of loosing the moderate and undecided voters, this happening in a flame of despair and defeat.

Report this

By Louise, October 18, 2008 at 7:50 am #

felicity,

You are correct, mainstreammedia does have to create controversy. But more than that, they have to create news. It’s not easy filling up 24 hours, seven days a week with “news” especially when you keep real reporters on a leash, rather than out looking for a scoop. Ergo, endless babble about mindless babble, trying to make the insanity sound sane.

MSNBC can be annoying at times. That’s why I just watch Olbermann and Rachel Maddow. They always give me a laugh, and sometimes laughing works better at keeping the boogieman away than a cross, or a curse. Chris Mathews generally has opposing sides, so-as to be “fair” but even he [and they] had little positive to say about McCains performance. [then or since] And I think that’s key here ... the whole thing is a performance, so we rate the candidates on who gave the better performance.

Since this particular performance, [economy, war and terror aside] seemed more at directing us to view who was more “presidential” Obama clearly won. Most folks don’t have a clue what’s going on, but they’re scared. Those folks want someone in the White House who stays calm and maintains absolute control, no matter how nasty those around him can be.

Obama was cool, engaged yet detached enough from the obvious inane comments from McCain, to respond thoughtfully with factual information. Information McCain really couldn’t refute, although he seemed to think if he just said the same thing over again, in spite of being corrected, somehow he’d look tough and aggressive. He didn’t. He looked silly and desperate.

I guess it all depends on what time you watch cable news, which is why I simply don’t for the most part. But this time I did watch MSNBC, because of Olbermann and Maddow. I also jumped back and forth to see what the focus group on CNN and PBS had to say. Thats when I heard the lament I mentioned in my earlier post, which I believe came from a guy from the right.

Fox had a graph showing feedback coming in from their viewers. McCain was ahead by some 99% which is why I had a good laugh! Sadly there are a lot of folks out there who believe FOX is the only news channel on TV. But believe it or not FOX ratings are tumbling. And I think we can credit the web for that. Even brainwashed people can be reached if you can separate them from their abuser. In this case FOX.

However, all in all as I channel hopped, clearly the majority gave the debate to Obama. Even McCain supporters were a bit worried. And as he and Palin continue to feed shit into the fan, they aren’t looking for a McCain win. [They’re looking for umbrellas] And asking, what can he/we do? Is it too late?

But like Obama said, we cant relax now. Repubs fight dirty and the kidney punch could still come, if we turn our backs.

Report this

By nrobi, October 18, 2008 at 7:02 am #

To Ed the unregistered commenter:  For some reason the facts seem to elude you, it may be that 50% of Americans do not read, (I would certainly like to find out where you have obtained your figures), but reading anything is better than reading nothing.
In serious times like these, with an economic meltdown, wars that America is unable to sustain, disastrous foreign policy, a health care crisis that expands by the minute and all of the liberties that have been lost for “Securities sake,” escapism is one of the most viable and needed alternatives to ever-increasing bad news.
Ed, you seem to think that reading Harry Potter, Nora Roberts and John Grisham, are bad, what do you purport we read?
As for not knowing the facts of the world as we are now experiencing, Ed, I more than some am aware of the growing crises and still have time to read works of fiction including Harry Potter and John Grisham, as well as books that are informative and enlightening. 
You sir, sound like a disgruntled Republican, who has had to switch to the Libertarian Party and know that your vote will count for nothing. You are the one with your head in the sand, and as regards your ideas, sir, you have a long way to go before you can debate a person like me, who is informed and aware of all the happenings around the world.
As regards Mr. Robinson’s article, he again is spot on in his assessment of the debates. Mr. McCain, has yet to prove that he is anything other than an angry old man, who thinks that he is entitled to the presidency, because he lost the primaries to the shrub in 2000. 
Mr. McCain, has shown himself, to be, something other than what he purported. He is now in the pockets of the Far Right Wing Christian Lunatic Fringe of the Republican Party, which is not the party that I grew up knowing. This is quite clear to me as Christopher Buckley, son of the revered and “sainted” Mr. William F. Buckley Jr., has come out in an article in the Daily Beast, as giving his support to Barack Hussein Obama.
The GOP of yesteryear, has gone and is now replaced with a “tax and spend,” party that knows no bounds in the pursuit of Bigger and Badder Government.
Under the current administration, we the people, who give the power to government, have lost so many of our rights that, we are now living in a proto-fascist state. The government is even listening to Amerikkkans phone conversations without so much as a warrant or any oversight by a judge or the Congress.
Both the Judiciary and Legislative branches of government have forsaken their Constitutional authority and we now have an imperial president, who if given the chance would suspend the Constitution and Bill of Rights, and suspend any election, that would have taken place and declare himself King for life.
I have yet to see any reason why this would not happen, and now with the Northern Command having a brigade of soldiers at their beck and call, hope that this does not happen. Further, the bill, House Resolution 1955, The Homegrown Terrorism and Radicalization Act, does away with the Bill of Rights and suspends any freedoms that the American public has in case of disaster or political unrest.
Along with the denial of our right to assembly, this bill suspends any of our rights to resort to the courts for redress of our grievances and does not allow through “force of logic,” the ability to change the minds of the people or Congress.
Should you doubt me, check the House Bills that have passed this year, and you will be scared and amazed that this bill sponsored by Jane Harmon, R Cal., passed by an amazing margin of 404-6.
With an overwhelming majority of the House giving credence to this obscenity, we are now living in a fascist state, just waiting to happen.
Ed, is this enough of the facts that you purport that the American people do not know and are hiding their collective heads in the sand about?

Report this

By felicity, October 18, 2008 at 2:54 am #

Louise - nope, MSNBC.  Fox is obvious to the point of being irrelevant.  Other media are not obvious which makes them potentially far more successful at propagandizing - and spreading misinformation. 

Media have to create controversy in order to stimulate the viewer’s natural fascination with conflict and thus keeps his interest - and loyalty to a channel.

Report this

By irishtornado, October 17, 2008 at 3:21 pm #

And he wants to have town hall meetings, yet. Is he not getting it? It almost hurts to much to watch and listen to him. I use to be able to mute the TV now that doesn’t even work.

Report this

By ed, October 17, 2008 at 1:12 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

the truth is, the american public is willfully ignorant of facts and intellectually incurious.  over 50% of adult americans do not read (their own admission)-the ones that do, read f*cking harry potter, nora roberts, and john grisham, etc.

Report this

By Louise, October 17, 2008 at 10:40 am #

I didn’t see his attacks as relentless. I saw them as irratic and dis-jointed. There were times he very nearly rambled and came close to drooling. And that fixed smile and the eye-ball rolling, intended I suppose to emphasize his kinda lost point, only emphasized his age.

I did not see his clenched teeth as a cover for his anger or bad temper. But I did see his rapid eye blinking as a dead giveaway he knew he was lying. Rapid blinking, clenched teeth. I guess that’s what lying through your teeth means.
Am I the only one who noticed him rub his nose downward between his thumb and forefinger when he spoke of Kennedy? Another dead giveaway the man was lying. And turns out he was. ‘Cause the story he related was completely untrue. Like so much he says, he just made it up.

So yeh, he sounded pretty bad, but worse than he looked? I think it’s a toss-up. But the two combined placed him firmly, even behinder.

felicity, were you watching FOX?

The pundits I heard pretty much called the whole thing for Obama. And frankly had very little positive to say about McCain. Eugene Robinson pretty much echoed what most of the talking heads were saying. I even heard one guy [I think it was on CNN] say he almost felt sorry for McCain, because his efforts to look tough and aggressive made him look a little lost and silly.

Another said it’s pretty obvious McCain thinks he’s earned the presidency [he’s been trying for ten years] and he’s so angry because he sees it slipping away he runs the danger of completely discrediting himself with the use of Palin and the negative attacks.

Didn’t hear a whole lot of praise, except when I checked over on FOX. Had a good laugh and moved on.

Report this

By sophrosyne, October 17, 2008 at 10:20 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

McPain is a cartoon character who has whipped up right-wing poulism to adangerous level.  McPain is ridiculous ands inept but Plain is a scary moron unprepared to be even governor of a Yahoo state like Alaska.

Truth is, America will need to retreat from many of its foreign obligations and check with China before doing anything that might please our new owner.  Bush’s vision of perpetual war for oil, defense industry and Israel is unsustainable given our new minor league economic status.

Report this

By felicity, October 17, 2008 at 9:12 am #

Jim Yell - I agree.  And after listening to some of the so-called pundits following the so-called debate, I felt insulted by the media.  Their praise of McCain’s performance, their projection that his performance would prove the better of the two, their utter disregard of his nonsense while concentrating on what little tidbits of sense he uttered and then judging his entire performance accordingly had me wondering if we had watched the same event.

Not only have we been insulted by Republican (and some Democrat) politicians for 8 years, the media have added to and enhanced their insults.

Report this

By Eric L. Prentis, October 17, 2008 at 7:53 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Sen. McCain’s character flaws make him the wrong man for the presidency. McCain’s temperament is bad, McCain is a hothead and erratic under pressure. McCain’s personnel judgment is terrible, Gov. Palin is not prepared to be VP and William Timmons helped Saddam Hussein. McCain is a risky gambler who supported S&L;deregulation leading to the Keating Five fiasco. McCain doesn’t listen, i.e., he talks over Sen. Obama and repeats the same talking points. McCain is a war monger who thinks it is alright to be in Iraq for 100 years. For good government, vote for Barack Obama.

Report this

By Purple Girl, October 17, 2008 at 7:31 am #

I’ll Take that Reference as a Compliment. Being of Jacobite heritage.
What an Absolutely perfect comparison Ah?
Not only Political strife, but Economic and Religious ramifications.
Didn’t some Jacobites practice a Religious doctrine which refused to bow down to Either the Catholics or the English Protestants Heirarchial Rule? In fAct did not even have a Heirachy within their ‘church’-Egalitarian. what would become of such current Duelistic leaders as Dobson, Hagee had to share their Pulpits. We couldn’t Pry the microphones out of their Cold dead hands-Egomaniacs
I still have plenty to learn about my Heritage, but so far it has provided me with Historical Conviction and Ancestorial Pride.
Bottoms Up!

Report this

By Fadel Abdallah, October 17, 2008 at 6:25 am #

Yes, I do agree with the essence of the title of this piece! However, I am not sure which is worse his looks or his words and speech. Let me put it this way: He’s terrible and evil through and through, and I am lamenting the fortunes of my adopted homeland for not being able to produce a better and more decent individual to run for the highest office!

Sad indeed!

Report this

By pete schnapp, October 17, 2008 at 6:14 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Let’s see;
His old-man, (Mr. “Patriot” himself), Admiral McCain, Was directly complicit in hiding the act of war committed by Israel in 1967 against the U.S. when they attacked the Liberty murdering 76 and wounding,(some permanently), +/- 175.
Also threatening them with “court-martial or worse”.
McCain himself, you drones’ war hero, signed 38 statements for Hanoi and some say his release of flight paths cost the lives of his fellow pilots.
His voting record shows he abandoned other MIA’s and POW’s, voted against numerous V.A. bills. So tell me,...why don’t ANY of you progressive sites demmand an accounting for treasonous acts that are committed by these swine? Are you being polite or watching out for pissing off the powerful?He has/is blocked a Russian request for extradition of a “person of interest” connected to the Russian mob w/ questionable ties to, yup, you guessed it, daddies old chums the Mossad,whom they want to interrogate over 9/11. Seems the governments of the world are more keen and focused on finding the “terrorists” than your own government.
It’s obvious the bulk of the voters haven’t a clue, so why not “clue” them in?

Report this

By Jim Yell, October 17, 2008 at 5:19 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

The Republican Party can not stand a lack of orthodoxy even within their own members. The current power structure has learned nothing from the damage caused by self-centered, arrogant and dismissive behavior of the current administration.

The Irresponsible offer for Vice-President of a clearly dishonest and untrustworthy minor politician from Alaska has shown what disdain and hate the Repubican Leadership has for America and our democracy.

They have insulted American citizens for 8 years and more it is time to wake them up to their error.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
Season's Greetings From Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.