|
|||
|
Bush Doctrine Becomes DoD DogmaPosted on Oct 14, 2008
Last June the U.S. Department of Defense unexpectedly issued a new version of its National Defense Strategy. It was unexpected because there will be a new administration in Washington in January, which might be expected to issue a statement of its own ideas about military strategy. Some in Washington speculated that Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, only recently named to that office, a man who gets along with Democrats as well as Republicans, might be bidding to keep his job under a new administration. The new statement lacks the Bush administration’s unilateralism or triumphalism (as if there were anything left to be triumphal about), but it foresees a “Long War” of “promoting freedom, justice and human dignity by working to end tyranny, promote effective democracies and extend prosperity; and confronting the challenges of our time by leading a growing community of democracies.” All that is straight Bush doctrine, drawn from his second inaugural address and Condoleezza Rice’s policy statement last summer predicting decades of a “new American realism” of “nation-building” to conquer “extremism.” By now the “Long War,” realistic or not, will have become orthodoxy for most of the Washington defense and strategic studies community. The noteworthy thing about this National Defense Strategy statement is that it says nothing directly about American national defense. It is a strategy for intervening in other countries, and preventing others from blocking or resisting American interventions. It states the responsibilities of America’s armed forces (summarizing the document’s introduction) as follows: Advertisement —Deal with the threats of rogue-nation quests for nuclear weapons. —Confront the rising military power of other states. These duties will require “the orchestration of national and international power over years or decades to come” to accomplish the following: —Long-term innovative approaches to counter al-Qaida’s rejection of state sovereignty, violation of borders, and attempts to deny self-determination and human dignity. —Deal “with the inability of many states to police themselves effectively or work with their neighbors to ensure regional security.” Armed sub-national groups must be dealt with, “including but not limited to those inspired by violent extremism” which if left unchecked will threaten the stability and legitimacy of key states, and allow instability to spread “and threaten regions of interest to the United States, its allies and friends.” —Form local partnerships and creative approaches to deny extremists the opportunity to gain footholds in “ungoverned, under-governed, misgoverned, and contested areas” affecting local stability and regional stability. —Counter Iran’s pursuit of nuclear technology and enrichment capabilities, and deal with the ability of rogue states such as Iran and North Korea to threaten international order, sponsor terrorism and disrupt fledgling democracies in Iraq and Afghanistan. —Meet possible challenges from (a) “more powerful states (that) might actively seek to counter the United States in some or all domains of traditional warfare or to gain an advantage in developing capabilities that offset our own,” as well as (b) nations that might “choose niche areas of military capability and competition in which they believe they can develop a strategic or operational advantage (even though) some of these potential competitors (may also be partners of the U.S. in) diplomatic, commercial or security efforts.” —For the foreseeable future, “hedge against China’s growing military modernization and the impact of its strategic choices on international security. ... The objective of this effort is to mitigate near-term challenges while preserving and enhancing U.S. national advantages over time.” —Recognize that Russia’s (pre-Georgian crisis) “retreat from openness and democracy,” “bullying of its neighbors,” and “more active military stance ... and signaled increase in reliance on nuclear weapons as a foundation for its security ... (are warnings of) a Russia exploring renewed influence” and a greater international role. —Prevent prospective adversaries, especially non-state actors and their state sponsors, from adopting “anti-access technology and weaponry (that can) restrict our future freedom of action,” and also from “making adversary use of traditional means of influence” such as by “manipulating global opinion using mass communications venues and exploiting international commitments and legal avenues.” —The global “commons (space, international waters, aerospace and cyberspace) must be secured and with them access to world markets and resources,” using military capabilities and alliances and coalitions, participating in international security and economic institutions, and employing “diplomacy and soft power to shape the behavior of individual states and the international system, using force when necessary.” The principal preoccupation of the document is the protection of American forces operating in foreign countries, and the blocking of measures by foreign states to “deny” American efforts to intervene in their countries or develop measures and technology to resist American intervention (or to send Americans to international criminal courts). As for the United States itself, the document quotes the constitutional obligation of the government “to provide for the common defense,” but says that today, after more than 230 years, the U.S. “shoulders additional responsibilities on behalf of the world ... a beacon of light for those in dark places.” Yet the fear of those dark places that permeates the document compels the suggestion that American troops remain at home, where they will be safe from enemies and untrustworthy allies, and defend their own country. Visit William Pfaff’s Web site at www.williampfaff.com. © 2008 Tribune Media Services, Inc. CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By Clash, October 17, 2008 at 9:26 am Link to this comment
moineau
Why would we need congress, are they not the very same people who voted to enact the small law called the PATRIOT act so they would never again have stand up and defend the constitution again.
The fact is that both of the major party candidates have said nothing about restoring our constitutional rights.
Report thisBy moineau, October 17, 2008 at 6:43 am Link to this comment
and where’s congress? don’t they have a roll in how war will be waged, when and if it is needed? i’d like an explanation of how they see their role. we need a truth and reconciation process once these assholes are out of office! i don’t see any other way to clear out all the crap the assholes left behind!
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, October 17, 2008 at 3:36 am Link to this comment
Robert Woodward explained the Bush Doctrine in two words: “They’re assholes!” Yeah. That’s how Bush himself described the difficult and complex situation of our relations (or non-relations) with Iran.
“They’re assholes” : They didn’t follow his script and idiotology but instead pursued what they perceive as their best interests.
“They’re assholes!”: When we went after Al Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan, Iran offered to help because they hate them even more than we do. But Bush stupidly rejected that opportunity.
“They’re assholes!”—No, George. You’re the asshole and you surrounded yourself with incompetent assholes just like you.
That’s the “Bush Doctrine”
Report thisBy Clash, October 16, 2008 at 9:15 pm Link to this comment
If you are worried about king Georges doctrines for the military domination of other countries you should want to follow the adventures of the 3rd infantry’s combat brigades now on assignment right here in the good old U.S. A..
Report thisBy Blackspeare, October 16, 2008 at 9:46 am Link to this comment
The Bush Doctrine of preemptive aggression reminds me a little of the movie, “The Day the Earth Stood Still.” Bush of course is not Klaatu, but more or less takes on the role of Gort, one of the army of robots assigned to protect the galaxy and beyond from dictators and war bent planets.
Report thisBy cyrena, October 16, 2008 at 12:01 am Link to this comment
By Leefeller, October 15 at 7:10 am
• “We need to change their name to “Department Of Offense”.”
Leefeller, I already did this 6 years ago. I’m glad you agree though.
Now, I’m not 100% certain that I understand what Dwight is saying here…
By Dwight, October 15 at 1:46 am
(Unregistered commenter)
“Long-term innovative approaches to counter al-Qaida’s rejection of state sovereignty, violation of borders, and attempts to deny self-determination and human dignity.” Which regrettably reject state sovereignty, violate borders, and deny self-dtermination and human dignity. “
HOWEVER, I’m going to give it the benefit of the positive doubt, by saying that I agree. I THINK he may be saying exactly what I hope he is saying, which is that the Bush Doctrine has CONSITENTLY REJECTED state sovereignty, VIOLATED borders, and DENIED self-determination, and DISRESPECTED human dignity. In short, the Bush Doctrine has violated every aspect of the laws of the land, and of humanity.
It isn’t al-Qaeda that has done these things, because al-Qaeda is like the Wizard of Oz..the illusion behind the curtain. It is only the ILLUSION of al-Qaeda that has brought the US to its knees, by exposing us for the frauds that we are. Take away the weapons, and we’re….toast. Couldn’t fight a FAIR battle if our lives depended on it….and our lives *have* depended on it.
Nope, al-Qaeda didn’t reject state sovereignty, or deny self-determination, or fail to recognize human dignity. They’ve only REACTED to far too many decades of US perpetrating those gross violations against the rest of the world. The Bush Doctrine is the most recent example.
The oppressor/aggressor eventually has to pay up, and payback is always a bitch. How embarrassing is it that a non-existent ‘enemy/army’ has exposed us for the bullies that we are?
Report thisBy Maryanne Jameson, October 15, 2008 at 5:13 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
In the immortal words of a certain pre-Bush, Democrat Sec. of State: “What’s the point in having a superb military if you don’t use it?”
Report thisBy Michael Labrat, October 15, 2008 at 2:30 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
The Department of Homeland Security is our new Department of Defense, charged with defending us against attacks.
The Department of Defense is now our Department of Offense, charged with winning wars we wage.
Report thisBy Leefeller, October 15, 2008 at 1:13 pm Link to this comment
Warning Ranting below:
“...promoting freedom, justice and human dignity…” Maybe they get their brainstorm ideas from the superman movies, even morons can do better than this, their madness reminds me of cornered rats,though not possible, for rats have a larger degree of intellect.
Carry a big stick, yeah a flag pole up their collective arses. A steady hand on the tiller, yep, crash McCain a hero maverick in his mind only and the mindless morons who froth at his rallies. Steady as she goes McCain.
Congress needs to be called on it’s opportunist ways, sleeping with lobbies physically and literally. Lobbyist’s scurry the golden halls of Congress like rats at a New York Taco Bell, promoting public agendas, no not quite; corporate rights ruled by the Highest courts of this land, to be equal to individuals rights. Instead, money talks, lobbyists have undue influence with their representatives, in fact they probably suggest the laws, not that cannot be? They supersede the slob on the street?
Tao Walker is correct they are desperate, Bush has gambled his next to last gasp, these gamblers with our nation promote nothing for the people, even the media seems to be catching on or not manipulated as much, sure propaganda exists, but truth seems more and more to be catching up, for Bush the next created tragedy on his watch, which may be the load that breaks the weasels back. Will marshal law be his final move? Bush must complete the last chapter of his Legacy as a classic Imbecile without proving us wrong.
Report thisBy TAO Walker, October 15, 2008 at 12:14 pm Link to this comment
Commenters here have certainly pegged the policy document in-question for the lethally toxic “hair-of-the-dog” that it is. The U.S. establishment’s learning curve is obviously nosediving right along with all the other “indicators” of institutional integrity here.
That other peoples around the world have already positioned themselves to respond to this threat of naked aggression primarily in ways not at all susceptible to armed force (their firm grip on the U.S financial “rug,” f’r instance), should alert at least theamericanpeople, if not their evidently unteachable “policy makers,” to the urgent need to find more sensible ways to engage their neighbors….in whatever mutual endeavors drastically-changing living conditions demand of domesticated humans en masse.
As usual, the spoiled brats in the american (and “global”) plutoligarchy are telling their subject/citizens, in effect: Give us our way or we’ll destroy your lives!” This is only a monstrous bluff, Sisters and Brothers, but you’ll have to call it to find that out for yourownselves.
They’re betting you all blink….and this idiotic declaration of “preemptive” war on the world is only their last-resort move to go “all-in.” So, who’s gonna call?
HokaHey
Report thisBy Inherit The Wind, October 15, 2008 at 10:41 am Link to this comment
President Obama:
Gates gotta go!
One of the collossal blunders of the Bush regime (and there are SO many!) was letting Rumsfeld and Cheney make Defense a leading agent of foreign policy. No sane policy would EVER give Def precedence over State, especially when there was someone as capable as Colin Powell at State. Yet that is EXACTLY what they did.
Talk about the tail wagging the dog! Defense must ALWAYS be an arm of State, not the other way around. What is Defense doing defining a world political strategy? It’s time the generals and admirals over there learn what their job is and stick to it! That’s the military defense of the United States! What’s wrong with that? It’s an honorable occupation!
Gates’s statement is pure and utter crap. I hope Obama is surrounding himself with ex-generals and ex-admirals driven out by Bush&Co;who can help him ID the politicos and replace them with the competent. And the Air Force is REALLY going to need a serious purging—like a HUGE dose of salts to get rid of all the religious shit putting our nation at risk.
Report thisBy Dagwood Engelberg, October 15, 2008 at 8:30 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Up until Harry Truman, the Department of Defense was called the Department of War.
Anybody else notice in the 2nd Presidential debates when the candidates were asked about the financial crisis’s impact on our ability to promote peace, McCain starts talking about invasions…
I’m so sick of this beacon of light on a hill b.s. Women weren’t even allowed to vote until 1920. For most of our history, more people were excluded from our democracy than were included in it. Now corporations run everything without anything like democratic responsibility: workers don’t get to vote to limit their boss’s compensation…
where’s the democracy? just as before, only with the wealthy… only now they pay for their votes with lobbyists, and derive their power from stock holdings rather than land holdings.
Our President is responsible for over a million deaths. We have entirely the wrong demographics in prison.
Report thisBy felicity, October 15, 2008 at 8:16 am Link to this comment
“...promoting freedom, justice and human dignity…” my foot.
“The global commons (space, international waters, aerospace and cyberspace) must be secured and with them access to world markets AND RESOURCES…” Written by a true capitalist who only neglected to mention ‘and access to cheap labor.’
I suspect this latest out of DoD was written before the unveiling for all the world to see of Wall Street’s incompetence, skulduggery, mendacity and just plain ineptness.
America’s standing in the world as the brilliant promoter and purveyor of capitalism-for-all has definitely taken a nose dive. Not only is the world no longer fooled by our ‘democracy’ schtick, it now knows American capitalism is seriously flawed and even letting it in the front door puts one’s economy in great jeopardy.
Report thisBy P. T., October 15, 2008 at 7:36 am Link to this comment
The U.S. ruling class has a hard time accepting that foreign countries have a right to control their own resources and economies.
Report thisBy Leefeller, October 15, 2008 at 7:10 am Link to this comment
We need to change their name to “Department Of Offense”.
Report thisBy davidperi, October 15, 2008 at 6:40 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
It follows inline with the image that America tries to sell to the world…#1, powerful and strong, successful living up to the American dream.
Report thisBy Maximilien, October 15, 2008 at 5:23 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Brussels, 15th Oct 08
Report thisVery worried and disturbed.The author’s article is a perfect summary of the “Hegemon’s bible” or, how to rule the world according to its own strict national interests. Democracy is just a label supposed to guarantee the authenticity of the White House ( and military complex) noble intentions.
What worries me most is the DoD blindness as they don’t even have a look at the U.S. budget deficit which is growing because of two wars on top of a unbridled capitalism ( I am of former staff officer and certainly not a left-winger) but adventurous enterprises are piling up and threatening the Western world with a lasting and dangerous imbalance.
By KISS, October 15, 2008 at 5:04 am Link to this comment
“it foresees a “Long War” of “promoting freedom, justice and human dignity by working to end tyranny, promote effective democracies and extend prosperity; and confronting the challenges of our time by leading a growing community of democracies.”
Report thisEverywhere except in Amerika, here we have NorCom willing and able to quell unrest of Amerikan citizens at a instant order of the commander-in- chief. To hell with the constitution and the mandates of governors. The supreme commander and DoD administrator has the military might to fire bullets against us citizens, remember it happened before under a repug leadership. I wonder if school text books of history still covers this black piece of our history? McCain might advocate, like Hoover, a chicken for every pot, a car in every garage and a bullet for every resistor..
By jackpine savage, October 15, 2008 at 3:03 am Link to this comment
“promoting freedom, justice and human dignity by working to end tyranny, promote effective democracies and extend prosperity; and confronting the challenges of our time by leading a growing community of democracies.”
Government writers are better than any other writers at using a lot of words to say nothing. Come on, what does “extend prosperity” mean?
In any case, the Pentagon (Department of War) is obviously intent on continuing the American Empire project…and that’s no big surprise. Now, if they can figure out how to actually be proficient at it.
Report thisBy Dwight, October 15, 2008 at 1:46 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
“Long-term innovative approaches to counter al-Qaida’s rejection of state sovereignty, violation of borders, and attempts to deny self-determination and human dignity.” Which regrettably reject state sovereignty, violate borders, and deny self-dtermination and human dignity.
Report thisBy Christian, October 15, 2008 at 1:41 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
How is it possible that these people convince themselves the the world wants US pubescent militarism to protect US imperialism and control with natural rescources?
Well if they stopped and looked in the mirror dor a minute or two they will see the entire military industrial complex looking back in laughter. The military is no longer in control of itself—it’s been overtaken by contractors, black programs and ideological mutants!
The notion that the US has the right to control energy technology or control other nations covertly is the most arrogant position in the Universe. I know that most independent thinking American don’t like this any more than I do, but it’s your country after all, so if I were you I would take it back from the corporate crooks and their “defense” buddies. It’s really very sickening to watch.
The American Pentagon Delusion could lead to World War III or “just” the detstruction of the America I love to visit.
Report thisBy Thomas Allen, October 15, 2008 at 1:33 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Then, we have to reign in the adventurous Pentagon boys and the ever-expanding, insatiable appeitite for new war toys and control of countries around the world. The U.S. bullies must be put in isolation, punished, and not let out of little prison boxes until they can act like sane human beings.
Report thisBy David Dixit, October 14, 2008 at 11:44 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
We are indeed hostile, and fed up with the constant American presence, military and cultural, as well as clothes decorated with cartoon characters… to say nothing about baseball hats !
Report thisEnough said, either behave with at least a modest amount of respect and dignity or stay at home… and take away your bases and rocket installations.
By thinkaboutit, October 14, 2008 at 11:30 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
Chilly, indeed.
Report thisBy P. T., October 14, 2008 at 8:06 pm Link to this comment
U.S. imperialism runs into the same problem over and over again: The natives are hostile.
Report this