Winner 2013 Webby Awards for Best Political Website
June 19, 2013

 Choose a size
Text Size

Trending:     chris hedges     economy     nsa     politics     robert scheer
Most Read

Reporter Who Brought Down the 'Runaway General' Dead at 33

Sen. Elizabeth Warren's Supreme Court Warning

Warren Opposes Obama Nominee, Lawmaker Urges Gender-Role Class for Kids, and More

The Terror Con

Rachel Maddow Gives Emotional Tribute to Michael Hastings

Most Comments
Most Emailed




The Unwinding


Truthdig Bazaar
One State, Two States

One State, Two States

By Benny Morris
$17.16

more items

 
Reports

This Is No Time for Specifics

Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Oct 10, 2008

By E.J. Dionne, Jr.

    Hope versus fear, new versus old: Barack Obama and John McCain have placed their bets. These are the terms on which the 2008 presidential campaign will be decided.

    That’s why it’s unfair for political bystanders to attack Obama and McCain for offering few specifics as to how they’d fix an ailing economy. And it’s foolish to ask them to jettison their campaign promises in order to pay homage to the God of Balanced Budgets.

    Each campaign has given voters ample notice about the inclinations, temperaments, habits, philosophical leanings and advisers they would bring to the White House. That’s enough.

    Piles of prescriptions would be useless because this crisis is moving so fast. New ideas could become obsolete in a few days—or require substantial redrafting on the run, as happened with McCain’s sketchy mortgage purchase plan floated during Tuesday’s debate.

    In this financial catastrophe, last week’s unthinkable idea quickly becomes this week’s imperative. The Bush administration is wisely contemplating following the lead of British Prime Minister Gordon Brown in having government take ownership shares in many banks to get them more cash and allow them to lend again.

Advertisement

    If Obama had suggested such a thing, he would have been condemned as a socialist and the administration might well have had to shelve a necessary idea. Better that the candidates acknowledge that they are powerless until after Nov. 4.

    As for cutting back on their programs because the government is spending and lending so much to save the economy, the candidates should just say no to the deficit carpers.

    Yes, the federal government faces a huge deficit, bloated during eight years in which many now crying out for fiscal responsibility put up little resistance when the administration started two wars and cut taxes at the same time. Where were the deficit hawks then?

    The time to balance budgets is when the economy is humming. Now, the government is obligated not only to prop up the economy but also to bring back long-term growth. That will require transformative investments in infrastructure, health care, education and new green technologies.

    If you think the number of Americans without health insurance is too high now, wait until this recession really kicks in. Few investments would help businesses more than offloading a share of their health care costs to the government. It’s social justice with an economic kick.

    In fact, if these various bailout plans work, the government should get much of its money back during an economic recovery. If they don’t work, balancing the budget will be the least of our problems. The short-term costs of healing the economy should be considered apart from the rest of the budget. We should create a separate Economic Recovery Authority to handle the outflow and (we hope) inflow of cash from various bailout plans. 

    Obama and McCain are giving us a clear sense of who they are and how they would lead. It would seem that Obama has been studying the 1932 Great Depression campaign of Franklin D. Roosevelt. The key to Roosevelt’s victory was not a big program but a jaunty sense of optimism in the midst of despair that led to his signature inaugural line—“the only thing we have to fear is fear itself.” Less famously, Roosevelt declared in his acceptance speech that “this is no time for fear, for reaction or for timidity.”

    In recent days, Obama has painted himself as calm, pragmatic, open and hopeful. He seemed to be channeling FDR when he told a crowd in Indianapolis on Wednesday: “This isn’t a time for fear or for panic. This is a time for resolve and steady leadership.”

    As for McCain, his campaign is trying to sow fear and panic about Obama. That’s exactly what Herbert Hoover tried to do with Roosevelt. Days before the 1932 election, Hoover attacked Roosevelt’s “inchoate new deal.” He predicted it would “crack the timbers of the Constitution” and warned voters to beware of the “glitter of promise.”

    Hoover stopped short of declaring Roosevelt a celebrity. But Donald A. Ritchie reports in his excellent 2007 book, “Electing FDR,” that Hoover saw Roosevelt as “his weakest and most vulnerable” foe and “did not respect him as a political rival.” McCain conveys unmistakably that he feels the same way about “that one” running against him.

    It’s too early to predict that the 2008 campaign will turn out like the one in 1932. But history suggests that in American elections, the candidate who underestimates his opponent often loses, and hope almost always beats fear. 

    E.J. Dionne’s e-mail address is postchat(at)aol.com.

    © 2008, Washington Post Writers Group


New and Improved Comments

If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.

By cyrena, October 11, 2008 at 12:26 am Link to this comment

“..(McCain)while speaking to a large crowd of supporters in Pennsylvania, he called his fellow citizens “my fellow prisoners” without missing a beat failing even to realize that he had done so…”

~~
Caryl..

If you hadn’t included the link, I swear I might have been skeptical. “My fellow PRISONERS”...OH MY GOD!!

Inherit, on the specifics, I have to agree with you to a limited extent. I say a limited extent because in my opinion, this is just more of the ‘damned if he does, and damned if he doesn’t’ stuff. Obama started out long ago, talking SPECIFICS. I’ve mentioned this before. He talked specifics all over the campaign trail, at town hall meetings and everywhere else.

And guess what? People complained. They complained that he was being to “professortorial’ (that’s not really a word, but that’s as close as I can get). They didn’t want the details. Sadly, some folks just can’t absorb them. My mother is like that…so is my ex. They ask you a question, but they don’t want to concentrate on the answer, or they don’t like the reality of it. They just want instant results.

That’s what people always wanna hear from lawyers as well. They do some incredibly stupid thing, and it gets them into deep shit, and then they expect the lawyer to say, “Don’t worry”, I’ll take care of it. Never mind that you were lying-in-wait and murdered 2 people in cold blood, leaving the murder weapon behind with your finger prints all over it. No worries. We’ll just hook you up with a little community service that you can do on a couple of weekends. No problem.

So, that’s the case with a bunch of other stuff. Folks would like to hear that we’re gonna have this really wonderful health care program, but they don’t wanna pay for it. That would mean higher taxes. I think he WILL get out of Iraq, for all of the same reasons that he didn’t think we should ever have been there to begin with, but also because he’s hyper-pragmatic and it’s costing too much in blood and treasure.

Obama didn’t name any names on Supreme Court Justices, but he did name who he WOULDN’T have supported, much less appointed, (Clarence the Thom) and that’s good enough for me. In fact, even if that was the ONLY reason for voting for him, (he already told Diane Waters that there was no time to whine, because McCain would appoint Justices that would set women back to the stone age) it would be enough. (women wouldn’t be the only ones thrown back to the stone age).

Then there’s Palin. It was bad enough when we were only considering what McCain was capable of. Now we know that he’s not likely to make it through a full term, and we’d be stuck with her.

Report this

By Bushfatigue, October 10, 2008 at 10:09 pm Link to this comment

Dopey David Broder says the “voters” want more DETAILS!, but what he really wants is to derail an Obama presidency, and is piling on the “no substance” talking points of the redumblicans.

David, David, David—have you heard of the web?  I realize that the radio had just been invented when you were born, and maybe you’re still catching up, but if you REALLY WANT DETAILS, go to Obama’s web site, and you can have all the policy details you want….if that was really what you wanted to begin with.

But what Broder and the rest of the neocon/neolib unholy alliance really wants is to set up the talking point that Obama lacks substance, which is laughable, in light of his life story.

Report this

By Alan, October 10, 2008 at 1:13 pm Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

It would be convenient, all too convenient
for Osama now to emerge from Dubyah’s
basement, or for some other October surprise
to occur with the express intention of
sweeping up the election process.
Perhaps under the circumstances now prevailing
even a couch potato can see the difference
between a hypocrite preacher of neoconmanism
and an actual hypothetical president. 
Well, we’ll see.

Report this

By kdnc, October 10, 2008 at 11:56 am Link to this comment

Weak-minded candidates, weak-minded author of this article…“this crisis is moving too fast.” There are plenty of people who are competent enough to not be discombobulated by the “speed” of this crisis. They understand what brought it on, and know what should be done to address it. Leadership doesn’t just talk about being calm in crisis or “channel” some other leader. Leaders point to a clear path forward. Something neither candidate can do.

Report this

By Alan, October 10, 2008 at 9:47 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

>Senator McGoo, the markets continue to drop,
what would you do today?
>> Ayyy , Ayyy…would lower the tax rate on
Mr. Murdoch.
> Senator?
>> Ayyy would use nuclear fuel to
fuel the fires of the fight against
terroristic Wall Street
Democrats.
>Senator, are you going to release
your medical records?
>> ... and I feel fine.

Report this

By Caryl S. Foster, October 10, 2008 at 8:59 am Link to this comment

Let us remember it was the national press three weeks ago and not Senator Obama who first labeled Senator McCain’s response to a worsening economy as “erratic”. And for sure, nothing that Senator McCain has done since then suggest he or his campaign has found their way back to the Straight Talk Express.

If anything, they have wandered further off course mostly talking about Senator Obama rather than the economy which is what the great majority of Americans do want to talk about.

And when he does deem to talk about the economy, sorry to say that Senator McCain acting erratically was most recently on full display when he changed his home mortgage bailout plan overnight for the worse and sadly, while speaking to a large crowd of supporters in Pennsylvania, he called his fellow citizens “my fellow prisoners” without missing a beat failing even to realize that he had done so.

“Across this country, this is the agenda I have set before my fellow prisoners…”

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/10/8/1550/41356/348/615972

“My Fellow Prisoners” goes beyond a gaffe of jokingly singing bomb bomb Iran, not knowing the difference between Shiite and Sunni, confusing international borders, picking a presidential running mate on the basis of a 5 minute first-time introduction, completely reversing his public stance on the state of the economy in two hours time, voting yes instead of no on a legislative bill packed with the very earmarks he had so consistently showed nothing but open disdain for and still does, or even hiring the same swift-boat artists who had previously unmercifully swift-boated him and his family to the point of distraught.

No, “My Fellow Prisoners” sadly goes back 40 years to the mentally and physically disturbing point in Senator McCain’s life wherein the public speaking of such an emotionally revealing phrase only there would unfortunately make sense in his mind without thinking twice about it. It is a past connection current disconnect.

At this point, whether one supports him or not, for his own sake we can all only hope that Senator McCain’s recent erratic behavior is a temporary thing and not something that is on the verge of becoming permanent.

Erratic Is As Erratic Does

Report this
Purple Girl's avatar

By Purple Girl, October 10, 2008 at 8:13 am Link to this comment

Johnny Boy, all Seven of YOUR Doorsteps are littered with Chickens and their Shit!
This Obama-Ayers Connection IS A BRidge to Nowhere….But Mac to this Economic Attack is Not a ‘Bridge too Far’ to cross.
Mac was exposed only about 6 yrs after taking Public office to be selling his favors to Banking- so he started pretty much straight off the bat. And Proof of his continued Corruption is evideneced by Phil Gramm over his Right shoulder (before Mac’s Wet Nurse took up the spot). Phil Gramm Euphemically calls his mission ‘Deregulation’ but in reality has been nothing but pure unabashed attempts at ‘Destablization’.
Then lets add in Mac’s Big Oil Connections and numerous appeasements and how that leads US right to his Undying support of the illegal invasion into Iraq ( rememeber HE is the one who put a fork in it with ‘Anthrax came from Iraq’- the last Nudge needed to convince US they were Attacking US, and an Immediate Threat- A LIE!)
Now he is the only one clinging to the idea of remaining indefinitely..Hmmm, Haven’t Shored up those Corp Oil Contracts enough Yet ah?
Funny that Ike’s devatation and resulting Oil disruption has had No effect on Oil prices…in fact the closer we get to the election, the price continues to Drop. But prior to that the skyrocketing prices were increasing food prices, causing layoffs, and kneecapping industries….Gee could that have been the reason people couldn’t pay their House payments????
John McCain has helped bring our country to it’s knees on three Fronts…Financing, Energy and International quagmire Conflicts!
Call Him What he IS…A TRAITOR, A WAR CRIMINAL and a Scourge Upon Humanity…3rd world citizens Starved due to the increase cost of Rice due to the Global Oil Price Gouging by Finanacial Speculators.McCains Feet Should be dangling Right next to Cheney’s!

Report this

By Lew Banelis, October 10, 2008 at 7:50 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)

Want real change? Ralph Nader,Ralph Nader,Ralph Nader.

Report this

By Big B, October 10, 2008 at 6:01 am Link to this comment

One must remember the oldest of political axioms, if you don’t make any promises, you won’t be accused of breaking any.

Report this

By Inherit The Wind, October 10, 2008 at 4:27 am Link to this comment

Every time we GET specifics from the campaigns, they are nonsense.

Obama’s health care plan is nonsense and probably won’t work.  Amazingly, though, John McCain’s is 100x worse!

Obama’s plan to win in Afghanistan doesn’t make much sense.

McCain’s makes even less.

Obama’s plan to get us out of Iraq is vague and MAY work.

McCain’s plan is to keep us there 100 years!

Obama voted to bail out the banks with our money.

So did McCain, but now he wants to spend another $300 billion shoring up the mortgages…didn’t he READ the bill he backed?????

Obama hasn’t said what kind of Supreme Court Justices he’ll appoint.

McCain said more Scalias and Thomases!

Specifics from Obama are bad.  Specifics from McCain are 100x worse!

Report this
Newsletter

sign up to get updates


 
 
 
 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
© 2013 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.