LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.Best Political Blog Winner, 2007 Webby Awards, People's Voice and Jury.   Gore Vidal and Mr. Fish - Exclusive Truthdig Gifts for the Holidays
 
December 5, 2008
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

‘Daily Show’: Is MSNBC the New Fox News?

Chevron in the White House

Will Obama Stay the Course?

Was There Any Point to the Bloodshed in Mumbai?

Gates Was ‘Hoping the Question Would Never Be Popped’

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports
 * NEW! * Bush the Infallible
 * NEW! * Those Other Elections

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
Unmasking Deep Throat

Unmasking Deep Throat

By John W. Dean
$15.00

more items

 
Reports

Sarah Palin the Sideshow

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Oct 1, 2008

By Marie Cocco

There is something about Sarah Palin that gnaws at me, and it isn’t that the Republican vice presidential nominee has wilted under the soft light shone upon her by CBS’ Katie Couric. It isn’t that I disagree with Palin on just about every single substantive issue I can think of, and probably some I haven’t thought about.

What’s bothering me about Palin isn’t even Palin. It is that she’s been made into the novelty act—even the freak show—of the presidential campaign.

Her mark in history may well turn out to be like that of the Pet Rock, one of those artifacts that has little value except as an object that is dissected for its cultural significance. During the brief but happy life of the Pet Rock in the 1970s, millions of Americans shelled out $3.95 to purchase an ordinary gray stone, packaged in a small cardboard box complete with an official Pet Rock training manual. The fad petered out in six months, but not before the promoter got rich and thousands of backyards became Pet Rock graveyards.

Now we prepare to watch Palin in Thursday’s vice presidential debate, compelled more by a cult-like curiosity than a call to civic duty.

Certainly some undecided voters may watch because they want to be convinced that the Alaska governor is qualified to be vice president or to determine, once and for all, that she is not. Republicans already attracted to her social conservatism and her family story will be cheering her on and will defend her against any slip or slight, real or imagined. Just as surely, some liberals will be itching to see what material Palin manages to serve up as fodder for Tina Fey and the writers at “Saturday Night Live.”

Palin has become a sideshow: See Sarah stumble through the Couric interviews. Watch clips of Sarah’s beauty-pageant swimsuit competition on YouTube. Laugh uproariously as Tina does a better Sarah than Sarah herself.

This is a terrible predicament not only for Palin but for all American women. 

For decades we’ve protested the way we are objectified, only to have a governor running for vice president turned into an object. She is an object of over-the-top partisan projections, from the left and right. She is an object of scorn. And in some quarters, an object of sympathy.

I do not blame Palin for this. Which young, ambitious male governor, upon getting the call to join the national ticket from his party’s presidential nominee, would humbly say, “No thanks, I’m not ready”? Yet some have laid Palin’s failure to turn down the chance at promotion at her feet, as if it were her responsibility—and not John McCain’s—to have chosen more wisely. Some conservatives who just a few weeks ago took delight in skewering liberal feminists with the rhetorical equivalent of Palin’s moose-gutting knife now are aghast at the gaping holes in her knowledge.

McCain and his campaign bear full responsibility. Palin’s initial introduction as one tough reformer turned quickly into a sales pitch for one tough hockey mom, capable of nursing an infant and nudging legislation to passage at the same time. Palin wasn’t expected to know anything about throw-weights. She was there to ease the worries the Republican right harbors about McCain and, it was implausibly suggested, to attract Hillary Clinton supporters to the Republican ticket.

The way Palin was sequestered from the media helped transform her into a calcified figure to be seen but not heard, at least not heard speaking from anything but a script. Like a Pet Rock, she wasn’t supposed to escape from the yard or require genuine training. She only had to stand and absorb every odd projection of the national imagination, however awkward and demeaning a task that might be.

Now Palin goes live alongside Democrat Joe Biden, and an odder couple has rarely shared a political stage. I do not expect Biden to be anything but superior in his knowledge and in the stature he is able to project to a worried public. He will be on guard against condescension. I do not expect Palin to collapse in utter confusion or do anything less than survive—even if she barely survives. But surviving a debate and the post-debate spin isn’t qualification for the vice presidency. That is the nub of it. 

Palin’s candidacy isn’t shattering the glass ceiling for her or any other woman. It is killing us with a thousand cuts.

Marie Cocco’s e-mail address is mariecocco(at)washpost.com.

© 2008, Washington Post Writers Group

Email Newsletter

Get truth delivered to your inbox every week.

Previous item: Invasion of the Sea-Smurfs

Next item: The Next President's Supreme Legacy

Jump to Comments

Advertisement


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Connie, October 7 at 2:52 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Sarah Palin is being used as a prop but she is so power hungry and clueless she doesn’t even know it.  She is an insult and an embarrassment to intelligent women everywhere.  She is now trying to incite fear and hate into Americans; what does she want to get Obama killed?  When someone yelled out “terrorist!” at a McCain rally, what did McCain do?  He smiled.  We are in the middle of a war on our economy, and she and McCain want to start a civil war.  McCain is an angry, vindictive old man, and Palin is an insult to her gender.

Report this

By GrammaConcept, October 6 at 9:52 am #

By Louise, October 5 at 6:20 am :

Louise, this is a brilliant little essay!…
I give you an A+…
Thank you for taking the time to clearly and effectively put it together...’-)

...We Do Strive On…

Report this

By Jim Yell, October 6 at 6:36 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

I once again saw the film clip of Sarah being debugged from witches. Something about it reminded me of Jim Jones. It was all very creepy and yet this seems to have been seldom used to make the point that the lady is “Mad as a Hatter”.

There is abundant reason to believe her finances are awash in dishonesty, but like Bush the person who should be investigated seems to control what actually gets investigated. When did this happen? How silly we have become to allow investigations to be derailed by the person who should be sitting in the hot seat.

Sad

Report this

By RJ Crane, October 6 at 6:04 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

While I would agree that picking Sarah Palin should reflect more on McCain’s stupidity and desire to win an election at any cost, which should totally undermine anyone who still believes he “puts country first”, I also have a real problem with Palin. Surely Palin must have known she had plenty of skeletons in her closet that would hurt McCain’s chances? Did she not disclose any of these or wasn’t she asked? And if she wasn’t asked, why didn’t she feel any duty to disclose them on her own including but not limited to these: 1. Her close association with a witch doctor priest. 2.  Her and Todd’s role in Troopergate and that both could be found guilty of using her office for personal vendettas.  3. Her teenage daughter’s pregnancy to a high school drop-out self-professed redneck. 4.  The circumstances surrounding her Down baby Trig’s birth including verification that this baby was really Sarah’s and not someone else’s.  5.  Her children’s history of drug and alcohol abuse.  6.  Her own history of rewarding friends without experience. 7. Her leaving Wasilla in debt because of bad decisions that were made to build a sports complex. 7. Her alleged affair with one of her husband Todd’s former business partners. 8.  The real reasons why she bounced around between so many colleges to get a BS or BA degree? 9. Both her and Todd’s associations with a group that advocates succession of Alaska from the United States. 10.  The real reasons she took her daughter Bristol out of Wasilla High school and put her in a school in Anchorage where she lived with Sarah’s sister with only a few months left in the school year. 11. Why she flew back to Alaska from Texas after her water broke instead of going to a local hospital to get checked out first.  12. That she really believes that the earth is only 6-7,000 years old.

RJ Crane, topplebush.com

Report this

By Louise, October 5 at 6:20 am #

McCain has a history of manipulating women. He is the perfect example of the man who has to daily validate his superiority by “correcting” thereby diminishing the people around him. This has caused the perception that he is a “maverick” because he challenges any opinion he doesn’t embrace as his own. When in fact he is not a maverick, he’s just a self-righteous, opinionated ass-hole who figured out how to make an income ... politically.

Sarah mangles the English language, and she’s not particularly well informed. And she has quite deliberately lied when bragging about her accomplishments as a Mayor and a Governor, so she deserves whatever she gets. But I think, her bad showing in ALL of her one-on-one interviews, is the direct result of McCains interference. Possibly coaching. The madman with the monumental ego probably corrected her so many times he shattered her ego. Her recovery, to the degree she recovered for the debate tells me, his campaign wisely separated them.

That ability to diminish everyone around him is why McCain has so few friends. That’s why he made no impact when he returned to DC and phoned everyone. And that’s why he selected Sarah. And that’s why, and the ONLY reason why I have some empathy for her.

But she’s still a liar, and ill-informed and I sincerely hope the embarrassment she has directed at Alaska is her political undoing. Because in spite of the fact that she has made Alaska’s voters appear to be very stupid, they are not!

Report this

By GrammaConcept, October 4 at 7:51 pm #

http://www.themudflats.net/

Report this

By Marnie, October 4 at 6:09 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

“Palin’s candidacy isn’t shattering the glass ceiling for her or any other woman. It is killing us with a thousand cuts.”

Absolutely.

McCain has insulted every hard working, intelligent woman.  If Palin ever realizes how he has used her, she is going to be even more pissed at him than most of the rest of the women of this country are now.

Report this

By OCPatriot, October 4 at 1:40 pm #

After watching both debates, McCain Vs. Obama and Palin vs. Biden, I finally realized what was bothering me. In terms of objective facts, in terms of truth, the McCain-Palin campaign seems to have piled up an awful lot of falsehoods; and in terms of being disparaging about their opponents, again McCain-Palin seem to do it quite often. I’m tired of untruths and I’m tired of the negative campaigning.  Not that Obama-Biden is blameless on both these counts, but they seem to have more truth and less negative campaigning in what they say.  I believe that, if McCain and Palin told the truth about what they want to accomplish and how they could do it, pecifically, instead of repeating slogans, they would have a strong case to make, but, alas, they haven’t chosen that road.  Call it bad advice or “win at any cost”, it really bothers me.  So I’ll vote for the lesser of two evils.

Report this

By Margaret Currey, October 4 at 10:06 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Did McCain think that this woman was equal to Hillary, What a joke McCain could have got someone who was running for president, but he was afraid to pick a man so to try to get the women vote he chose a woman who did not know a thing about foreign policy, a person living in the Northwest would not even consider Canada a foreign country.

McCain as I write this is pulling out of Minn. and soon his number will go down, only way to become President is to rig the election, and Repubs are good at that.

Report this

By Bill Witherup, October 4 at 6:58 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Not only is Sarah Palin a Freak Show, our culture itself is nothing but a 24/7 Virtual Reality Side Show.  We don’t get to meet the politicians in person, or hear them speak from the caboose, or at Union picnics. The corporate owners of the television stations control the national psyche by editing and choosing the images that we see. Also, for every two minutes of so-called news, there is a minute and a half of mind-numbing adverts. We are not citizens, we are consumers. The United States is functionally illiterate - we are supposed to graduate from high school with the ability to read. If you have the ability to read, you should have the ability to think. But the corporate types, who want to be sure we have people always begging for work, use television as a Mind-Vacuum, a black-hole which sucks up neurotransmitters. Capitalism needs unthinking people, and a brutalized work force, for it to keep feeding. Newspapers and magazines are laying off reporters in the newsrooms, so those of us who do read and think will have fewer writers to read. Goebbels would have loved to have television available to inflame the masses. On the other hand, television encourages passivity. Consume, consume, consume. Gorge yourself and puke - we might as well build new vomitoriums along with the increase in prison building. Hardly any of the Intellectual Talking Heads seem to be aware that television is the very means preparing the way for the collapse of the social order. - Bill Witherup, Seattle, Washington

Report this

By hollyse, October 4 at 5:07 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Was McCain’s choice his? Palin serves to keep the public occupied while ECONOMIC MARTIAL LAW was put into place. The public still hasn’t figured out the psychological control of Bush Administration’s crushing and restructuring America towards the New America unifying Canada, USA and Mexico. Her naieve contribution of “gotcha” basically is being used against her. She serves purpose keeping the public occupied and entertained while the bigger boys are making sure their bank accounts are secure.  No election! Military troops(Raiders, 1ST Brigaide ready to go from CO Springs,CO) against any disention when the 850 billion not used for bailout of financial markets along with personal debt of big time money operators. The nearly 1 trillion isn’t enough. Has the news told us where the money is coming from? US real estate will be on the market to highest bidder to paying off China and other creditors. Palin is but a sacraficial lamb for public amusement. There’s nothing worse than a woman scorned. This is just the beginning. A duck should never think they can fly with the eagles as it’s a flight to no where just like the bridge to no where. Making people think what a smart move for Reps to have this gal on the ticket was a major bread and games move. There’s no bread anymore folks. Just the game and we’re getting the first recognizable game move to the many others to follow. Palin isn’t the lead sled dog anymore where the lead dog has the best view.McCain took her off the chain. The Bush admin. is using her and her family while destroying each and every American family’s morals and values, investments and savings. She’ll be left on a chain to die as in the movie “Eight Below”. The Bush Admin. has only contempt for average ‘Joe-Six-Pack Sarah’ while using a woman to further bringing down a nation. They’ve taken her son along with many sons and daughters as a means to their ends.

Report this

By fedupinfla, October 4 at 12:01 am #

I hate to admit this but once upon a time when I was much younger and desperate for a decent paying job, I bullsh!tted my way through a job interview that I KNEW I wasn’t fully qualified for. I padded my resume and gave all the right answers to the interviewers questions fully expecting to be called out as unqualified. I came across as confident and experienced when I knew in my heart that I wasn’t prepared for the position. This was a simple restaurant mgrs. position I might add. Imagine my surprise when I was actually hired and expected to perform the way I claimed I could!! Needless to say, I couldn’t and I was fired for “not meeting company expectations”.  I’m a lot older now and I now have the experience I claimed I did back then.  I also have an inate ability to smell the same BS I tried pulling all those years ago....And boy does something STINK about Palin. Its a smell I remember quite well....Unfortunately, once she’s “hired”, there won’t be that same performance review and it’ll be 4yrs before she can be “fired”. Imagine the damage that she can do in that time!!!

Report this

By Palin's spirit ?????, October 3 at 4:18 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I had only seen the Tina Fey Palin, and I thought she was a funny happy good spirited airhead.  I confess I really liked the Tina Fey Palin.  I thought I could stand to see a few minutes of the real thing (I avoid watching all politicos, just can’t stand it).  The real Palin I saw was not nearly has happy as Tina Fey, she struck me as very serious, a pit bull indeed, without humor, and judging by some of her remarks (she respects Biden but not Obama because Biden’s son is going to Iraq) a very low rent sort of person, and she’s played that one twice now.

But then her sister says that Fey nailed her?  Did she really?  Is it wishful thinking on Palin’s siter’s part?

I only watched a few very short snippets.  What is her dominant personality like?  Happy?  Funny?  Pleasant? Or otherwise?

Report this

By walfy, October 3 at 3:23 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

How can the writer of article say it’s not her fault? Not at all? Her blind devotion to ideology without due consideration of facts is what got her in the pickle she’s in.

Report this

By LJ in MD, October 3 at 1:46 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Poor Little Sarah
Those big meanies of the MSM are really a bunch of poopyheads. And that AA moderator ...I mean just who does she think she is?
How dare someone “like her” ask Sarah a question and insist that she answer that question, not one of her own choosing?

Just imagine this scene a few years from now.....
General: “North Korea just launched a missile at Japan, what should we do?”
President Palin: “In what respect General?” “I want to continue to talk about what a Maverick I am”. “Did you know I built the Alaska Pipeline?”.

Report this

By Nino, October 3 at 8:41 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Yes,she is a pathetic joke..an absentee mom..never home to take care of her kids.does she wait till she sees them off to school,homework done,faces washed,rooms cleaned..is she there when they come home at 3pm...she was never there for her knocked up daughter....but she does grin a lot and hates that kitchen and making cookies for those dang kids..as a daddy of seven.all college grads..I had a wife who was constantly with our kids..during school,after,pta,coach of their basketball and softball teams..etc etc..McCain with his supprt of slave labor products..nafta..putting millions out of work here is hardly an american firster...the other side is sooo marxist I kinda like them ,they are honest in their hatred of our Judaic _Christian nation..what a Hobsons choice again ..man the establishment has no respect for we peasants at all...Nino (looking for Pats pitchfork and that bridge up near Boston)

Report this

By MH in Florida, October 3 at 3:37 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Palin is being used.  They will destroy her political career like they did to Kathleen Harris(Florida) after the 2000 election.  She was and is clueless of the events and issues outside of Alaska.

If they should win, heaven forbid, she will be forced to resign (for personal reasons) and will be replaced with Lieberman.

Report this

By Opening Eyes, October 2 at 4:57 pm #

What Palin appears to be:  A school girl who mentally checks out of the conversation while still continuing to chatter.
Now, how will she do with foreign policy interactions?  What confusion will she create?
Why didn’t McCain pick Condoleeza Rice?  Too educated, too elitist, too qualified to court the uneducated vote?
She can be condescending with Democrats and play “Gotcha” with them, but she isn’t up for taking what she dishes out.

Report this

By nobozos, October 2 at 3:50 pm #

I don’t agree with this post at all.
Basically what Cocco is saying is ‘poor little Sarah, in over her head all because of a mean old man, not her fault at all’.

While 44 may be young in upper echelon politics, it’s not young in life, and Sarah had a CHOICE whether to put herself and her family through this. I don’t apply for jobs I’m grossly unqualified for, and the fact that Palin thinks she’s ready to be president shows she’s too dumb and ambitious to know she is not.

She’s in the big leagues now and she’s striking out. The debate is about an hour away, and for the good of this country, I hope she falls flat on her perky ass.

Report this

By ocjim, October 2 at 12:28 pm #

The fact that many voters are swayed by wedge issues, that past elections show a willingness to vote against your own interest, that critical times might prompt illogical voting, that a simple terrorist attack could swing voting—all these things could give us McCain-Palin, an unthinkable choice for intelligent voters but not emotional voters.

After accepting an opportunistic, cynical choice like McCain, the resurgence of the nightmare is based on the odds, a tragic accident or violence.

John McCain rolled the dice on Sarah Palin. Bob Rice of Tangent Capital pointed out that the actuarial risk, based on mortality tables, of Palin becoming president if the Republican ticket wins the election is about 1 in 6 or 7.

With a tragic accident or targeted violence, the odds can be cheated or increased.

How are those for odds that someone worse than Bush could try to govern—another four years of hell.

Report this

By Rodger Lemonde, October 2 at 12:24 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

We will see if you can polish number two or not when this debate is over.
I think probably not.

Report this

By Kurt, October 2 at 10:20 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

TDBach is probably right, his or her thoughts that McCain just saw a nice governor and said, “What the heck?” Although he probably used a stonger four letter word.

Still, although I could never vote for a Republican again after what Bush II has done, McCain should have learned from the examples of Al Gore and Hubert Humphrey and not run away from the President. 

If he had really wanted to shake up the race, McCain should have asked Secretary of State Rice to be his VP, it would have really shaken up the race and while McCain might not have won, he would have had one heck of a better chance.  AND there would have been no objectification of Rice.

Report this

By wish i knew, October 2 at 9:02 am #

Marie Cocco is so right, this nomination has become a freak show. Better yet, I feel it has been reduced to a disturbing challenge to the McCain camp not to find and offer a qualified #2 in command to the American people, but to package, market and sell a product to the voting consumer. McCain would probably be doing better in the polls if he just put her on a shelf at Walmart. 

But the thing that scares me more than anything is that I think Sarah Palin believes to her very core that GOD has tapped her to be the Vice President of the United States. This is a woman on a quest to fulfill her mission. It is obvious in her ability to mask her ignorance with utter nonsense and still maintain a certain level of smugness; as if she knows something that most people don’t.

This is not a slam to people of faith. It is a grave concern about those who are unwilling or unable to temper their faith with reason and intellect. We have ample evidence throughout history of the type of people who support these endeavors and the devastation that is inevitably left in the wake of these “missions accomplished”.

I can only hope the majority of American people are finally realizing that, now more than ever, they just can’t afford to buy Sarah Palin.

Report this

By Laurie, October 2 at 7:29 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Hippy Pam - I see you’ve been in my neighborhood! I mean really, since when did intelligence become a stigma???

Report this

By Fahrenheit 451, October 2 at 7:22 am #

@ Cran Berry;

IMHO, you’re out of your element.

Report this

By Kmuzu, October 2 at 5:30 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

I have stopped dumping on Sarah. Not because I think she is even remotely qualified. I’m stopping because she’s a buffoon and I’m starting to realize the pathos involved.

Palin is in over her head and she has dragged her whole family down with her. The sad part is she doesn’t even realize it. As you become an adult you see that life is not a movie. This is not “My Fair Lady” or “Pretty Woman”. Things do not end, Happily Ever After.

She may have charm, but she doesn’t have the three things you need in national politics: cunning, temperament and patients. She lets her alligator mouth get way ahead of her tadpole ass. Worst of all Palin panics.

Shame on McCain and shame on me.

Report this

By tdbach, October 2 at 4:35 am #

Sam, I think you give McCain too much credit for his apolitical dimension. McCain is every bit as political as any Clinton - just not as smart. He LIVES to be elected, to climb up the political ladder. Every move he makes is calculated toward that end, including his supposed maverick votes.

McCain’s problem isn’t that he lacks political will, it’s that his above-average will is guided by no-more-than-average smarts and he’s impetuous to a fault - a gambler.

His choice of Palin came as a result of his frustration in not getting the running mate he really wanted - Lieberman - accepted by the political machine he depends on to get elected. So he looked around, discovered (or was pointed to) this attractive governor whose family-values, religious-right credentials were over the top, who is a woman, who has a reformer reputation (if not rightfully earned), and thought, What the heck, let’s go for it! He didn’t bother with due diligence, beyond a quick check for deal-breaking skeletons. This was a purely political move based on a “paper” analysis: a winner for religious right? Check; a woman in a time when women are in political ascendancy? Check. Blue-collar appeal to bring out elitist left derision? Check. Surprise the pundits to bolster my frayed maverick brand after having to dump virtually all of my “maverick” positions in order to get the GOP nomination? Check.

And it worked, for a while. His candidacy was transformed from a tired old tepid partisan affiliation into something exciting and new – virtually overnight. But the longer Palin stayed in the spotlight (or was hidden from the spotlight), the more people began to see just what a cynical and perversely political choice this was. The core conservative electorate (not the conservative intellectuals) can rationalize this into acceptability without breaking a sweat, but a majority of people who are fed up with Republican rule but haven’t bought into the notion of a Democrat, let alone a black democrat, running the country are coming to the realization that there’s a real problem here, not just with Palin but the guy who picked her.

Report this

By JimM, October 2 at 4:31 am #

Marie, you are insulting the intelligence of pet rocks by comparing them to Sarah.
Even if she pukes on the stage, the repugs will claim that she won the debate.

Report this

By hippy pam, October 2 at 4:09 am #

ANnnnnd.....We-THE SHEEPLE-wait-as supplicants-humble-on our KNEES-in an attitude of PRAYER-for the LATEST RVALATIONS....YEA-TO HEAR THE SACRED WORDS OF THE LORD....fall-STRAIGHT from the “PITBULL LIPS” of the “Right Reverend MOOSE TURD-governor of WAH-SILLY ALASKA”............

Report this

By SamSnedegar, October 2 at 3:11 am #

Palin was a joke by McCain’s quirky sense of humor. I think he KNOWS that he will NEVER be allowed to occupy the White House, and he keeps running so as to make it as difficult as possible for the Bushitter gang of thugs to solidify dictatorial power and suspend elections until further notice.

McCain could likely have beat Obama if he did nothing, because Obama is black. So if McCain isn’t trying to win, and surely he must not be, then the answer to why he behaves so strangely must lie in something HE knows that you do not, and I only suspect but cannot prove.

Could be that McCain is living on borrowed time and is having his last joke at the expense of an unsuspecting electorate.

Report this

By Fahrenheit 451, October 2 at 2:32 am #

Marie Cocco;

Nice one, I agree.

Report this

By redwhiteblue, October 2 at 12:52 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Mentioning Hillary Clinton is seldom done this past month or so. Hillary is a very intelligent woman who will no doubt find herself as a very important part of Obama’s cabinet.Isn’t it strange that there has not been a comparison made between the exceptionally smart Hillary and the Bush speaking Palin? Sarah speaks like she was tutored by Bush. I have always had to read at least 3 times any Bush comments to figure out what he said, I do the same with her remarks.

Report this

By DoctorK, October 1 at 11:24 pm #

Well-written! Yes, it is unfortunate that what should be a sentinel event for women on the national stage in a presidential election should be mired in questions of (in)adequacy and (sub-par)intelligence.  Perhaps that is why so many pro-Hillary women voters (that the Repubs so arrogantly thought would be easily swayed to vote for them) are so vocal in their condemnation of this pathetic pick. 

I have faith that a woman candidate, most likely Hillary, will eventually not just crack, but blast through that glass ceiling!

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!






Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

Newsletter

Get Truthdig in your inbox

Privacy Policy

 
Click here to advertise with Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2008 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.