![]() |
|
||
|
Hillary Made History EnoughPosted on Aug 27, 2008I didn’t make it to Denver. A death in the family kept me close to home, where words like healing, closure, catharsis—those theme songs of the convention—took on a whole different meaning. This was the first convention I missed since 1972 when I was sent to Miami as a younger reporter because there was a “women’s story” brewing and they needed one. I was there when Shirley Chisholm’s run for the presidency turned into a sprint for the vice presidency. She won more delegates’ hearts than votes. I was there in 1984 as well, just after Geraldine Ferraro sent goose bumps of possibility across the country, saying “American history is about doors being opened.” We were sure it was a beginning. And I was there in 1992, in the aftermath of the Clarence Thomas hearings, when angry women energized the Year of the Woman, sending four new women to the Senate. The same year Hillary Clinton made her debut and her audition tape as the favorite target of the right wing. This time I watched history as a civilian. This time, Clinton’s loss—nearly as close as Milorad Cavic’s to Michael Phelps—shared the attention with Obama’s win. Advertisement This convention seemed more like the last act of the primary than the opening act of the election. Democrats had provided nearly all the drama of this season, an 18-month run, a narrative with two compelling leads, a race between two people to open the door of history. A door that could only admit one at a time. For the first time, the woman checked off the box of experience. And watched it reframed as “old politics.” A thoughtful, eloquent Obama won the mantle of change from the woman who had always been its Rorschach test. The primary revealed fissures just below the calm surface of race, gender and generations. Even the Republicans held fast to this riveting narrative. The party that had drooled at the prospect of running against Sen. Clinton held Hillary Happy Hours for her supporters and fueled their grievances. The McCain campaign ran television ads straight from the primary script, wooing Hillary supporters even while she said, “I’m Hillary Clinton, and I do not approve that message.” I was not surprised to see the tenacity of this story line. However many speakers talked about the 18 million cracks in the glass ceiling, the ceiling is in place. While polls say that women now feel it’s more likely to have a woman president in the future, older women wonder, “In my lifetime?” Michelle Obama offered a pitch-perfect speech, ending in a display of courage appreciated by every parent—allowing her daughters before an open mike. But it was hard not to notice that the only female running mate was again describing herself as wife, daughter, mother. Another woman keeping her edge under wraps and her law degree in her hip pocket. Some women listening to Hillary’s powerful speech heard more reasons to be disappointed. What we know about the “sisterhood of the traveling pantsuits” is that women need a farm team. The real gender gap is an ambition gap. Not enough women imagine themselves running for office and so do not run for office. But what we also know is that you can use disappointment to self-destruct or reconstruct. “Were you in this campaign just for me?” asked Hillary. It’s hard to believe that in the end many Hillary voters will turn to McCain. What kind of revenge is it to vote for a man who doesn’t believe in women as moral decision-makers on the thorny issue of abortion? What kind of feminist statement to vote for a man who did not vote for equal pay for equal work? To the No Obamas, to the PUMAs (Party Unity My A—) who made more noise than news, she replied, “No way, no how, no McCain.” Hillary’s speech was the curtain call of this drama. Near the end, the senator offered a long view. “My mother was born before women could vote,” she said. “My daughter got to vote for her mother for president.” That, for the moment, is history enough. Previous item: Universal Health Care Makes More Sense Than Ever Next item: Questions for Hillary's Zealots Elsewhere: . CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment
|
A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved. |
By AuntBec, August 30, 2008 at 9:41 pm #
I listened to my Republican banker neighbor loudly complain to his daughter today about the fact that John McCain had just sunk the party’s chance of getting anywhere near the White House in November. He wasn’t JUST complaining that his VP pick was a woman, but he seems to think experience matters. Teeheehee
Report thisBy Blueboy1938, August 30, 2008 at 3:39 pm #
As did Walter Mondale in 1984, the desperate ol’ maverick-turned-Bush-clone has picked a nationally unknown woman to create some excitement in his campaign. Gov. Palin has even less experience with foreign affairs than Obama, zero to his serving on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, where he chairs the European Affairs Subcommittee. Furthermore, she is reputed to be a “creationist.” Isn’t that great? We are worried that the children of this nation are insufficiently grounded in science, and we may potentially put someone “a heartbeat away” who rejects science! If that doesn’t scare those Clintonians who might vote for McBush back into the fold, I don’t know what will.
Report thisBy Rockytonker, August 29, 2008 at 8:51 pm #
Hillary and Bill redeemed themselves for any and all their questionable words in the primary. It is so obvious how much he adores her and believes in her. But Presidential elections come only once in 4 years, and they caught the back side of the wave that started them in public service. A new generation will fulfill the dreams of the last.
We will soon see whether America is ready for a President who is not of northern European ethnicity. America may have been ready for a woman President, but Hillary didn’t believe so; her hawkish rhetoric betrayed her belief that a woman has to be a man to be Commander in Chief.
And the GOP reveals its most juvenile nature, placing politics ahead of governance, by pandering to Clinton’s diehards, choosing a VP candidate with far less substance than the man they’ve tried to paint as “not ready.”
That is just about the ultimate slap in the face to women, and I bet you ladies see it that way. But don’t let on until after their convention, OK?
Report this