|
|||
|
Baghdad Behind WallsPosted on Aug 14, 2008
By Anna Badkhen BAGHDAD—The busy Dora Market, fabled for its cheap clothes, kebab stalls, vegetables and fish fresh from the muddy waters of the Tigris River, is an embodiment of revival in Baghdad as the city recovers from years of sectarian strife. Men mill freshly slaughtered lamb in manual cast-iron grinders on iron stalls that choke narrow alleyways and sell pickled vegetables from large plastic tubs, and women peddle spices and fruit. Shoppers navigate past grapes oozing juice and piles of kitchen utensils imported from Syria and Iran, and boys push heavy carts laden with fresh herbs and hawk sweet tea in delicate glasses. But people driving past the market on a four-lane highway cannot see any of the bustling trade from the road. Instead, they see a row of concrete barriers that surround the market. Like most of Baghdad, Dora, a predominantly Sunni, middle-class district of 450,000 people, is a maze of 12-foot-high walls that American forces have erected to quell the sectarian strife that afflicted the city from 2005 until early 2008. In a sign that the people of Dora, which a year ago was a hotbed of Sunni extremist militias associated with al-Qaida, no longer feel threatened by sectarian militias, shop owners at the market are requesting that the Americans remove the wall that blocks their stalls from view from the highway. “There was a reason once for these barriers, a security reason, but now it’s gone, so why not remove them?” asked Samir Ibrahim, who sells fresh kebab sandwiches from a rickety stall about 30 yards inside the wall. His business partner, Abdul-Rahman Shillah, pointed to a row of shuttered shops that face the wall. “This side used to be all restaurants. Now they are closed—nobody sees them from the road, nobody goes there,” Shillah said. Some American soldiers agree. Advertisement However, American forces are not removing the barriers just yet, fearing for the security of the shoppers and vendors at the market. The fate of the T-walls, as American troops call the barriers, is connected to the much larger question of Iraqi sovereignty, for the American combat presence here is ostensibly balanced against an independently functioning Iraq. “Most of the complaints that we’re hearing have to do with inconvenience,” said Lt. Greg Garhart, one of the 2-4 soldiers who patrol Dora. Having the barriers in place “closes [people] off to an extent, but it also makes it safer.” When the first walls went up in Baghdad, American and Iraqi security officials touted the gated communities inside as models for reconciliation and reconstruction in the rest of Baghdad, much of which is ravaged by sectarian violence that reached its peak in the city last year. In Saidiyah, a religiously mixed neighborhood a dozen blocks west of the Dora Market, sectarian violence ceased after American troops enclosed the area with 77,000 concrete barriers, leaving one entrance and one exit. But even in Saidiyah, the walls are getting mixed reviews. Residents complain that when they return to their neighborhood, they have to wait for two hours in the blistering sun to get past the checkpoint manned by Iraqi forces. Shop owners who sold flowers from a row of nurseries on the western border of Saidiyah complain that the barriers have cut off entrance to their shops, leaving their households without stable sources of income. Apart from such inconveniences, the barriers, some Iraqis say, are psychologically oppressive. “They give an impression of fear,” said Safa Hussieni, a young doctor who lives in central Baghdad. The Americans, he said, “have to decrease their number.” Previous item: A Cut-and-Paste Foreign Policy Next item: Cold War Spin Only Compounds Georgian Crisis CommentsAre you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig. Add Your Comment |
By nomorebombs, August 15, 2008 at 11:55 am Link to this comment
(Unregistered commenter)
the war monger is diebold and hes been rebooted and updated..
Report thisBy cyrena, August 14, 2008 at 8:41 pm Link to this comment
And then there’s that wall being constructed just to the South of US.
Report thisBy yellowbird2525, August 14, 2008 at 4:11 pm Link to this comment
there were no WMD, no link at all with Al Quaeda (sp); that was when England gave Iraqi refugees 3 weeks to depart; the Iraqi’s do NOT want the US there; they (shiites) & others say it is a dictatorship & while it was bad under Saddam Hussain it is FAR WORSE hundreds of times worse with the “set up” by USA with same large Corps there as here; see graft & corruption in Iraq in Yahoo & other news; SAME AS IS HERE FOLKS! Bush said :we prefer to be called dysfunctional instead of dictatorship (see Canada) from when we went up there & paid big bucks to their heads of states: same as in Mexico; and now civil unrest in these countries as well as all others that it has been done to; American citizens need a NEW MINDSET; no insurgents here says US soldier: just people wanting us OUT of their country. http://www.democracynow.org under back door loss; said insurgents is giving people the WRONG IMPRESSION (gasp! shock!) THAT has never been done by Gov b/4! poor poor Iraqi’s: the citizens of the USA never meant for you to be treated in such a manner as we are & have been!
Report thisBy felicity, August 14, 2008 at 9:28 am Link to this comment
Walls are walls afterall - keep people out and keep people in. Interestingly, their justification seems to depend on who erects them.
When the Soviet Union walled-off East Berlin from West Berlin, the wrath of the entire western world, especially the US, came down on Russia’s head. On the other hand, the fact that Israel is managing to erect walls all over the real estate it claims as belonging to her, the US is silent.
And of course now that we’re in the walling business, it’s completely necessary and justified.
Report thisBy Fadel Abdallah, August 14, 2008 at 8:14 am Link to this comment
I am amazed how this writer managed to simplify the Iraqi situation in terms of sectarian violence and inconvenient segregation walls!
She wants us to imagine that these walls just fell down from heaven, as a mercy from a merciful God, to make life safer for some half a million people!
An article that doesn’t contain a single word about the evil American occupation that brought about all these “inconveniences” does not only deserve the ink consumed in writing it, but it also adds insult to injury to people who are consciouses free thinkers!
Report thisBy Big B, August 14, 2008 at 6:18 am Link to this comment
The walls are just an homage to the Iraeli model of how to deal with rowdy neihbors. You fence them off, where you can keep a good eye on ‘em. Then, when they start starving and try to sneek out for food, you shoot them! This solution may sound cruel, but it’s roots worked in the US. It is after all the same thing we did to the Blacks and less desirable eastern european immigrants. We built tennement housing for them, close together in the inner decaying northeastern cities (put ‘em all in one place, that way we can keep an eye on them) Then have all your financial institutions ostricize them and major employers only hire them for menial, low wage jobs. (that will keep them in the tennement, away from the all-white suburbs). But the advantage of the American model is that when our “undesirables” try to come out from behind their walls, we don’t have to shoot them (nearly as often)
Report this