LOGO: Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines. A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.  
November 7, 2009
Log in / Register

 Choose a size
Text Size

Most Read

Steve Fraser on the Crisis of Capitalism

Sen. George McGovern on the Presidency From Lincoln to Obama

'Daily Show' Insta-Classic: What Lurks Within Glenn Beck?

America Performs Its Familiar Role of Propping Up a Dictator

Happy Birthday, Pat Tillman

Most Comments
Most Emailed

Reports

Ear to the Ground

A/V Booth

Arts & Culture

Digs
Financial Meltdown 101
Vetting Sarah Palin

Truthdig Bazaar
Daphne’s Lot

Daphne’s Lot

By Chris Abani
$13.95

more items

 
Reports

What’s Sex Got to Do With It?

Email this item Email    Print this item Print   
Posted on Aug 9, 2008
John Edwards
AP photo / Steven Senne

By Chris Hedges

If I had to choose between George W. Bush, naked and neighing on all fours while being ridden around the Oval Office by a spurred cowgirl Condoleezza Rice, or enduring his shredding of domestic and international law to wage an illegal war and bilking of the country on behalf of his corporate backers, I could learn to stomach a wide array of sexual escapades. 

Let our elected leaders and candidates have quick homosexual encounters in airport bathrooms, bring as many hookers as they want to their hotel rooms, and screw around with their campaign staff as long as they exhaust their libidos on lusts other than war, torture and economic mismanagement. Adolf Hitler, after all, was an abstemious and monogamous vegetarian who loved his German shepherd. 

But, unfortunately for us, and hapless politicians like John Edwards, our press finds it more lucrative to report salacious sex scandals than the death and maiming of tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians, although the mainstream press showed, for once, a remarkable restraint until Edwards was forced to confess. We hear more about pricey hookers and the bathroom code of cruising homosexuals than the revoking of habeas corpus, the use of torture as an interrogation technique, and the plundering of our country by rapacious corporations. Television dominates our news content, and its ethical standards hover around those of the National Enquirer.

The press has become our arbiter of personal morality. Have an affair and they will trap you in the middle of the night in a Los Angeles hotel bathroom; they will dig up the escort you met in a Washington hotel room and splatter your private foibles across television screens and news pages. These stories gratify our prurient fascination with illicit sexual liaisons. They are part of the blurring of news with the tawdry world of reality shows and television entertainment. They produce titillating rituals of public humiliation and disgrace. They also lacerate the secret guilt of those who have felt or acted upon lust while in committed relationships. It is all Jerry Springer, all the time. 

Reporters often know the sins of which they speak. They can shame John Edwards, Eliot Spitzer, Larry Craig and Bill Clinton and then head off to a hotel bar to do the same thing. The moral lapses of our media inquisitors, which I witnessed for over two decades as a reporter, can be as reprehensible as the behavior of those they cover. 

Advertisement

Chrome Bag - Free Shipping
I do not trust or believe most politicians. I have covered too many. The question is not how we can get good people to govern. The question is how we can limit the damage of mostly mediocre, callow men and women, who comprise the majority of those who yearn for power, from doing the most harm. This comes through the rigorous checks and balances of a functioning democracy, not self-appointed political saviors. But we always prefer saviors, those who make us believe they have attained moral and heroic summits that elude us.     

There is something sad and pathetically human about Edwards’ affair and his cowardly attempt to lie about it. I never liked Edwards. He is all flash and sparkle with his boyish $400 haircuts and oily sincerity. He preached a faux populism, one at odds with his record in the Senate, to sell himself to voters. But, even as I do not condone what he did, I feel sorry for him. He is being crucified by journalists and politicians, and a public, who often behave no better.

We demand that our politicians play superhuman roles. They cannot exhibit the weaknesses and temptations we carry within ourselves. They must appear to be perfect parents, wives or husbands. We insist that they behave like the idealized couples we watch on television or in the movies. Campaign appearances, with the dutiful spouse as prop, are scripted mini-dramas. We live in a society so saturated in lies that we can no longer distinguish between a married couple in a sit com and on the campaign trail. Bill and Hillary continue to act out their sham roles of committed husband and wife. And, despite all the evidence to the contrary, people continue to believe in the Clintons’ charade. 

Political leaders no longer need to be competent, sincere or honest. They only need to appear to have these qualities. The most essential skill in political theater, which has no room for knowledge or debate or trust, is artifice. Those who are most able to entertain, that is, to deceive, succeed. Those who cannot play these roles, like Ralph Nader, are pushed to the sidelines.

There are worse things done by politicians than illicit sexual adventures. Ask an Iraqi. Ask an Afghan. Ask a detainee at Guantanamo. Ask an unemployed steelworker in Ohio. But in an age of images and entertainment, in an age of instant emotional gratification, we do not want honesty or even reality but the reassurance of old clichés, stereotypes and mythic narratives. We want leaders who are willing to pretend they live in a make-believe world of happy couples and perfect relationships. We want to feel that they like us and we want to like them. This gives us what television gives us, a simplistic narrative around which to frame our lives. This narrative defies the messiness and disorder of the real world. If politicians adhere to this ridiculous narrative of personal happiness and fidelity, designed to reassure us that the world is ordered and neat and constant, they can commit egregious war crimes and strip us of our power. If they do not we will find better actors. 

Edwards’ dishonesty does not compare to Bush’s impeachable crimes. But Edwards’ political career has been cut short, unlike Bush’s, because he had the bad luck to get caught out of character behind the curtain. 


Elsewhere: .

Comments

Are you a Truthdig member yet? Login now, or register with Truthdig.

By Sabagio Mauraeno, January 4 at 8:21 pm #

Dr. Jacob Bronowski summed it all up in the last chapter of his marvelous work, The Ascent of Man: “It’s all about sex; before sex,it was a pretty dull world.”

Sabagio Mauraeno on a dull damp day in Decatur, GA, waiting for the clouds to lift,the Sun once again shine, and ...

Report this

By Sabagio Mauraeno, December 25, 2008 at 12:49 pm #

Yea, tis Cynical Times in which we live,So, on this day when we prefer to Give
So be thankful we have still

Oh, Brave New World, for Good or Ill
As in a tale best told by Will,

In Tempest,  Prospero,  someone whom we all know whose calling is to put the damper on our Show,

“Our revels now are ended. These our actors,
As I foretold you, were all spirits, and
Are melted into air, into thin air;
And, like the baseless fabric of this vision,
The cloud-capp’d towers, the gorgeous palaces,
The solemn temples, the great globe itself,
Yea, all which it inherit, shall dissolve,
And, like this insubstantial pageant faded,
Leave not a rack behind. We are such stuff
As dreams are made on; and our little life
Is rounded with a sleep.”

But The Bard will not let this be the Last Word,  and so it’s through Miranda, who was there and heard all the Wizard had to say, and still proceeds along her dreamy, optimistic way,

“O, wonder!
How many goodly creatures are there here!
How beauteous mankind is! O brave new world,
That has such people in’t!”


Sabagio Mauraeno, awakened by the shrieks and screams of glee by those who find under their Xmas tree, gifts and gadgets, expensive watches,
on this day only, given freely, with no catches.

Report this

By Sabagio Mauraeno, August 14, 2008 at 8:02 am #

John Edwards?  Yesterday’s news. He cuda been a contender. Now he’s not, his future defined as an inconsequential blip on the timeline of American political history. What a legacy! Unfortunately, the Commentariat of national news readers can’t let John go just yet.  There is too much prurient interest in his public disgrace remaining to be mined , to much money to be made by corporate marketteers and other miscreants in their constant quest to milk the last drop of air time from the public display of the misery, angst and confused states mind of his   family and friends.  Ah, America. What a country!

Report this

By cyrena, August 14, 2008 at 12:13 am #

Rowman writes to Patrick Henry

•  “Anyway. As much as you love your little democrats, at some point you are going to have to come back to reality. They are the epitome of hypocrisy.”

~~~

Patrick Henry. This should be a clue to you, not to take the bait from a presence on this forum who has proven himself over and over again, to be a slime-cluster scumbag proto-type of the karl rove series. If he actually had any other purpose besides the swamp reptile partisan goals of the same repiglicans (which actually gives pigs a bad rep) that have destroyed us to date, he would KNOW that you aren’t a ‘lover of little democrats”. You’ve stated your case for Ron Paul countless times before, and while I’ve respectfully disagreed with you in the past, that would be enough of a clue to anyone really paying attention, that you aren’t a ‘lover of little democrats.”

As an aside, I DO believe that MSM should have given Ron Paul far more voice for participation, just because that’s the way it should rightfully be. I emphatically believe the same about Dennis Kucinich. It’s the only way the American public could have a full look at any of these candidates, because it’s imperative to put them ALL under the microscope. Enough debates on the ISSUES, and a close enough examination of their Congressional behavior, (ie all of the bills that they’ve sponsored, and how they’ve voted, and their personal careers and all the rest, should be on display as much as the next candidate). In the end, THAT is the best way for an informed citizenry to make the choices that actually do represent more of the population. But, it has it’s downsides as well, because one must be able to withstand close scrutiny, and effectively defend past behavior and activities, and I’m ONLY talking about the behavior and activities involved in their work for the public. I still don’t care about any of the rest of this private stuff.

An example is Ross Perot, who actually sounded good enough in his debates and stuff back in the day. Had I NOT been aware of the fact that he runs his business, (EDS) like a concentration camp/gulag, I would have been easily convinced as well. I don’t think that ever really came out though. And, that’s how we’ve become stuck with so many other bad news folks on Capitol Hill. YOU knew McCain was a raving lunatic who treated his staff like shit, long before I did, just because you have that connection. (of course since then, his public references to his wife as a cunt, and other similar things has pretty much made that obvious). Still, you get my point. They ALL need full exposure, and then the public can decide what’s important in a leader, and what is less important.

But, that DOES require an informed public, and one that can tell the difference between ideology and reality, and how they effect each other to the extent that the greater public good is served or not served.

As for rowman, we’re talking diabolical ideologue for whom the primary goal is bulldozing anyone who might actually serve that public good, rather than his own perverted and hateful agenda. These types NEVER profess any specifics for what ‘good’ or positive traits their own candidate or party might have, (because how does one point to ANYTHING acceptable about McCain or the current batch of republicans?) So instead, each and every word or nuance is focused on the other guy that must be rammed down, at all costs. That’s just the scumbag way.

In other words, ALWAYS ACCUSE the OTHER, of EXACTLY what it is that they themselves are guilty of. That’s exactly what McCain’s campaign has been about.

Karl Rove and rowman in action. Despicable.

Report this

By rowman, August 13, 2008 at 11:43 pm #

Now how about that…. Some common ground.

They all need to go.

I am down with you on Ron Paul but I am done voting for the “less of two evils”.

Report this

By PatrickHenry, August 13, 2008 at 6:17 pm #

By rowman, August 13 at 4:21 am #

Actually I would like to “flush” all encumbents and start anew.  The lobbiests would have to start their courtships all over again.

I prefer Obama much more than McCain and I prefer Ron Paul over all of them.  I voted for Nader the past 2 general elections but he doesn’t seem to have “it”.

The non reporting event demonstrated by the MSM, who went out of their way not to report about Ron Paul, was criminal and certainly opened my eyes as to how far our so called “free press” has been manipulated.

I can safely say if you are a neo Republican (Bush or Reagan type) you are either a moron or have been paid off by them with some of the trillions my grandchildren will have to pay back.

Report this

By wag, August 13, 2008 at 6:00 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Points well taken. Except: no one has a right to judge a relationship/marriage between other people. Why the reference to the Clintons’ relationship as a “sham?” How do you know? None of your business, Chris. Stick to your main subject, a good one, and stop judging what you don’t/can’t possibly understand.

Honestly, what makes people think they’re entitled to hold such opinions let alone express them publically?

Report this

By mike kohr, August 13, 2008 at 5:46 pm #

AT,

The 10.4 trillion you quote is our debt using the “cash”  method of accounting,  which only the government uses. The “cash” method is in effect how much our national checkbook is overdrawn.

Using the “accural”  method of accounting,  which every business uses, our actual debt,  which includes all of our obligations (Veterans benefits,  Social Security,  Medicare, ect.) is approx $69 trillion,  or $375,000.00 per working American.

78% of this debt has been racked up by the last three Republican presidents,  Reagan,  Bush,  and Bushed.  12% of this debt is WWII debt we have not yet paid off.  The remaining 10% is due to various other reasons.

We can not afford another Credit Card Republican for president, incidently McCain’s tax cuts,  targeted at the richest 1% of Americans will produce 1 trillion more dollars in debt than Obama’s middle class targeted tax cuts will.

mike kohr

Report this

By Kathy Kang, August 13, 2008 at 4:20 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Edwards scandal suddenly reminds me of those dark years when media was obssessed with digging out dirt on Clinton. How could we ever forget all the stones self-righteous others were throwing at Clinton—including Edwards? My close friend David asked me to vote for Bob Dole,and later got very angry after finding out that I voted for Clinton anyway: He even questioned my own morality for having voted for “immoral” scumback(in his words). Well,guess what folk! A year later the true David was exposed; he had been engaging in incestuous sexual relationship with his own daughter ever since she was little. It’s time for us to spend less time on politicians’ sexual behaviors with willing adult participants—-instead,we need to expose the huge problems with incest and sex slavery involving minors as young as 5 and 6. Let us expose those men,and have the real serious issues on the table.

Report this

By denise, August 13, 2008 at 2:00 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I understand your frustration with this seemingly inane scandal; the personal suffering of all involved, innocent and guilty, in transgressive sexual behaviors is what tugs at my heart and head. But that’s not my gripe here. What bothers me about your article is the assumption that we aren’t outraged by the Bush Administration’s lies and Machiavellian-like tactics; or that our nation’s insidious policies haven’t been reported and discussed, approved and condemned in the free press. Haven’t you been reading the newspaper for the past eight years? How about listening to the news on radio or TV?
The Punk (Bush) and his bullies haven’t been removed or shamed into resigning, that’s true, but that doesn’t mean that more than half of the thinking voters in the nation wouldn’t like to see that happen.
You’re reacting just as loudly as all the folks pretending they’ve never committed a false deed are reacting.
Edwards, and these other fallible human beings who were caught in the light with their pants down, generally take political advice from a host of advisers. And often, it seems, the advisers tell them to step out of the flashlight’s beams because this particular kind of misconduct suggests to the public that they are hypocrites in their homes (do what I say, not what I do), and this misconduct hurts and humiliates, to the core, the people the human man loves the most: his family; and contrary to popular belief, a married (however you define it) couple are family. 
Your righteousness indignation about human rights abuses in the US and around the world is right on, but to suggest we don’t wrangle over these issues day-in-and-day-out in the media is myopic.

Report this

By Denise Minick, August 13, 2008 at 11:39 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

I hear a lot of self righteousness around Edward’s marital mistep.  But how many of us would act in the same way given the same circumstances?  Power is a great aphrodiasiac and all the history books confirm this.

But on the whole I lean towards your arguement that failures in personal morality are to be preferred over public acts of wanton pugnaciousness, aggression and war.

I am saddened that Edwards’ message of fairer re-distribution of wealth will now be ignored.  And he can never be considered a Vice Presidential contender.

Report this

By Navy Brat, August 13, 2008 at 11:11 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

It’s not only Elizabeth that our dear John cheated on. He cheated on all of us, that’s a given. It’s not that it’s our business…..but he lied.
However, it is only Elizabeth that has the right to slap his lying face. The rest of us really need to drop our stones. There are those glass houses on every block, eh? It’s a marriage issue and we are not married to the man.
His misadventure is absolutely nothing compared to crimes, not indiscretions, committed against all of us by the current crime mob in the White House. It is going to take one hell of a president to get us out of the mess Bush has created and spread globally.
For my money, I don’t care if he has a bevy of hookers in the White House every Saturday night, prays to a goat and howls at the moon as long as he is effectively taking care of the people’s business.
We used to understand the concept of prioritizing our national interests. If the state of the nation was strong, we didn’t worry about the state of the president’s union. I long for the old days.

Report this

By rowman, August 13, 2008 at 11:07 am #

Re: Sabagio Mauraeno, August 13 at 6:53 am #
“John Edwards had a public message that still needs to be heard “

Sadly, he could care less about poverty. Anyone willing to shell out $400 on a haircut has no concept of what poverty is so he is most definitely the wrong guy to carry that message.

To him, it was nothing more than a marketing angle to establish a platform. The Democrats did not care for his message and platform so they opted for Obama’s marketing instead. “Change” that elusive word that can infer so much but means so little…

Fact is, Pelosi owns him. Reid owns him. Dean owns him. Kennedy owns him. And now we know that corporate America owns him as well.

I have an idea. Obama should change his marketing slogan to better reflect the situation. Lets try “Same”. As in The “Same” corrupt policies and government that you can rely on to screw you over again.

That is something you can believe in.

Report this

By Sabagio Mauraeno, August 13, 2008 at 10:53 am #

Sexual adventures and the US Politician.

I never cease to be amazed by the arrogance and conceit of politicians who think they won’t be caught in dalliances of the first kind. Nelson Rockefeller let his gonads get the best of him;Gary Hart believed that it was OK to play, so long as he did it on shipboard;Bill Clinton was a sex addict that future psychobabble pundits will base their entire careers on; and Governor’s mansions in every state have the potential for carrying on sexual indiscretions even when protected by State Police assigned to keep their mouths shut.

Now it’s John Edwards.  Here is a man who set himself above the fray, whose public image of loyalty and commitment to his wife stood out as both rare and exemplary. And then he goes and does something stupid. That’s what is disappointing. Why?  Even though he’s no longer a candidate, he makes the national news. People think he still has something to say that’s relevant, important and necessary to the Presidential Debate. For example the issue of endemic poverty in our country was abandoned by Reagan and his Babbits.  Remember Ron’s expose of the welfare mom with a Caddy parked out front of her house. Ron’s predecessors were too timid and too concerned about how conservative talk show blusterers and ditherers would react, labeling them “bleeding heart liberals.” Remember George I’s campaign against Willie Horton and his followers? Probably not.  The recent gasoline price gouging and accompanying panics at the pumps demonstrate how fragile our economy is, and how vulnerable all of us who are not members of our economy’s Inner Sanctum are to fall below the Poverty Line. We will be joining millions of our Invisible Citizens who have been there for years, generations.

Why is Poverty a critical issue. The Greed is Good proponests should view it as the more poor people we have, the less money to do the things necessary to survive as a civilization;the more our “dependant populations increase in numbers, the old , sick, and young, the more drain on limited resources will by to bring its member back from beyond redemption and becoming Productive Citizens. 

Poverty in past times, the Great Depression for one, was a condition fraught with potentials for political instability and social revolutions. Marie’s “Let em eat cake” solution toppled the French heads of state. Our Bonus Marchers were viewed as such a threat they were driven out of DC by armed troops lead by the WWII hero, Douglas MacArthur and his sidekick, DD Eisenhower.

But we’ve forgotten about these difficult days. The Boom Times of the Baby Boomers, whose motto has been “It(poverty and political upheaval)Can’t Happen Here” prevails in spit of some very real New Realities. 

So, yes I’m disappointed.  John Edwards had a public message that still needs to be heard and had a national forum where it could be heard:Endemic Poverty in the US of A is a clear and present danger, and should be addressed with as much vigor and debate as the war in Iraq, international terrorism and costly energy shortages.

Now he doesn’t.  And it’s a shame.

Report this

By Ted Swart, August 13, 2008 at 9:58 am #

Amazing how many comments on this forum are completely off topic.
I sometimes wonder which world Chris Hedges is living in.
What on earth does he watch on TV to be able to speak of “the idealized couples we watch on television”.  That is certainly not what appears on my TV.
He speaks as if crass sexual misconduct and the violation of human rights are mutually exclusive. It is often a case of “both and” rather than “either or”.
Neither journalists nor politicians rank high in public esteem for a very simple reason. Both professions tend to put forward/propagate ideals which are very far from their own personal lives. A plague on both houses is what I say.
I am still waiting for real honesty from Chris Hedges and everyone else. Hedges persists in maintaining that formal religion has something useful and noble to offer us. Unless and until a truly free-thinking presidnetial candidate stands a chance of being elected we will carry on in the same old way.

Report this

By Ted Swart, August 13, 2008 at 9:38 am #

Amazing how many of the posts on this forum are completely off topic. 
I sometimes wonder what world it is that Chris Hedges is living in.

Report this

By FlamingLib, August 13, 2008 at 9:27 am #

Chris, where did YOU get that info about what Dubya and Condomliza do in the oval office?  I thought I was the only one who knew about that!

Report this

By AT, August 13, 2008 at 9:17 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

There’s only (one word) for this: National Debt(10.5 trillions)

Report this

By Gloria Picchetti, August 13, 2008 at 9:10 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Out of all this who says what to whom I like Big B & his wife. They should run for office! I wish I could afford to run to France. When they have affairs no one cares. Well the French are having a bit of trouble with an Italian first lady slash supermodel slash pop star. But Bruni-Sarkozy isn’t collecting 50K a month pour se taire (shutting up.) She made her own money and her story is a love story not an affair. I don’t care what John Edwards stands on as long as it doesn’t cost the taxpayers nor his political supporters money.

Report this

By rowman, August 13, 2008 at 8:21 am #

Re: Patrickhenry

You want to know what is really funny. Someone here pointed me to that while referencing another issue they posted on.  They were slamming someone and misread the article they thought backed their position. Cited it as a ref. to back their position. Oh, my side still hurts from laughter.

Anyway. As much as you love your little democrats, at some point you are going to have to come back to reality. They are the epitome of hypocrisy.

Take the word change. Everywhere you look, Barak supporters are pimping the word “change”. We need change they say. We need a new way of doing things so let’s “change”. But if you press on, you find that they are not talking about any specific change. It’s more like a concept but there are no tangible metrics behind this change. Change is a marketing word that means nothing. It is empty.

The Democrats are offering four more years of the same government mismanagement and they market it as “Change”.  Now that is Hypocrisy!

Same Corporations will remain in charge of the government. The change Obama is talking about is what is left in your pocket after he robs us with the corruption we know he is capable of. Just look back at his dealings in Chicago.

You guys remind me of the Bush Republicans who backed him several years ago and is now looking back trying to figure out where things went so wrong. That will be you too….

Report this

By PatrickHenry, August 13, 2008 at 6:36 am #

By Harry, August 12 at 4:28 pm #

Says who? you.  You are obviously a neo-Republican and if you continue to post here be advised that your hypocrisy will be pointed out to you.  It is very easy to “attempt” to negate others opinion while not offering any of your own.  Cyrena has a long history of commentary here, you don’t.

By rowman, August 12 at 4:44 pm #

Your counterpunch article is laughable considering it is written by a pro Israel and therfore anti Obama writer and is full of conjecture, banter and name calling (not against McCaint of course).

Its a no brainer that the Corporations would withhold their monies until they were sure they knew which way the wind was blowing.  Irregardless of how the diebolded polls are reported, the Republicans and many old time Democrats (who are no better than the Repubs) are doomed this election.  I don’t think diebold can save them, hence this last minute war against Iran, courtesy of Israel and all their lobbying might as their overrepresentation is doomed too.

Report this

By rowman, August 12, 2008 at 8:44 pm #

http://counterpunch.org/

Oh dear, what has happened to the knight on the white horse?

This week, many of Barack Obama’s admirers were shocked. Up to now, it had been believed that the huge sums of money flowing into the coffers of his campaign came from anonymous citizens, each sending a check for 100 or 200 dollars.

Now, alas, it has been disclosed that a large part of those millions actually came from big donors - the very same huge corporations, their CEOs and lobbyists, who have corrupted the democratic process in previous contests. They spread their largesse generously and simultaneously among all the candidates from left to right, so as to be on the winning side whatever happens.

Obama had promised to put an end to the old, dirty corporate funding-for-influence system. Now it appears that he participates in this corrupt system himself.

What a disappointment.

Report this

By Harry, August 12, 2008 at 8:28 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Propagandist is correct. Democratic Propagandist is more precise.

Millions and Millions and 10’s Millions of people disenfranchised by our recent political parties is a lie. As much as I dislike them, that is a made up statistic and it’s not true.

Here is an example: “Iraq is in possession of weapons of mass destruction”.

That too is propaganda and I do not tolerate ANY. If you want to, that is your business. The democrats have lots of it too so have fun.

Report this

By Frank Cajon, August 12, 2008 at 7:59 pm #

While I personalizing our differences usually gets us nowhere in general, and I don’t blog here very often because of that and some pretty big differences I have with some of the more outspoken regulars on TD, this time I don’t hesitate to make a bit of an exception. Though she has no need of it, I would like to point to new poster Harry that first off Cyrena has thousands of posts on this board which are quite often characterized by citations of links and articles to carry her points-even when they are ones I don’t agree with. What her assertions (or mine, or anyone else’s) have or don’t have to do with what goes on in places like churches is irrelevant and the low road labeling of her as a ‘Propogandist…not worthy to be in America’ is just the kind of moral absolutism that the new Right Fascism has brought to what once was the sane discussion of how to improve this country.
If you, personally, have managed to escape the economic ravages of the current economic holocaust, and don’t think a few more thousand lives and limbs traded behind lies for oil dreams and corrupt schemes are a problem, that is your business. Good for you, keep the blinders on; but you make more dignified arguments if you refrain from hanging such labels upon those who don’t share your opinions.

Report this

By Harry, August 12, 2008 at 7:04 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Poor PatrickHenry.

I was responding to roman who said cyrena was pushing the democrat party propaganda. I agree and was citing an example of her propaganda.

I also want a new government and the democrats are not going to give it to us.

And cyrena has the audacity to cite the veterans in her made up statistic. The democrats VOTED FOR THE WAR! The Home Mortgage Crisis can be traced to the democrats also.

Report this

By PatrickHenry, August 12, 2008 at 6:43 pm #

By Harry, August 12 at 4:45 am #

Full of useless criticism and blind to boot.

These past 8 years from the diebolded election against Gore to 9/11 to the castration of the constitution (“goddamn piece of paper”) have been the most un-American I’ve seen. 

Harry, I see you have some of the Bush dickheadism in you as the “decider” of who deserves to be in Amerika and who doesn’t.  Moreover, who’s a terrorist and who isn’t and who has rights and who doesn’t.

More 700 club soup kitchens!! thats your answer.

New government, thats mine.

Report this

By Harry, August 12, 2008 at 8:45 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Yes cyrena, I must be blind because there is not a single shred of evidence to back this up. Nothing and pointing to another post to back up your assertions is absolutely preposterous.

You make some big claims here and there is nothing to support it. It’s all a made up lie! That means it is PROPOGANDA! You are trying to tell the world that we are on a mission to slaughter millions and millions and those we don’t slaughter, well. We will just leave them starving, homeless and destitute. That is Anti American Propoganda!

Ordinary people in this country give billions of dollars to help people all over the world. Go to any local church and they are raising money to help someone, somewhere. Everyday, people help others by volunteering, feeding homeless etc.

But not cyrena. She wants to invalidate real Americans and write Political PROPOGANDA sitting on her lazy butt. If you really cared, you would be helping someone.

Its disgusting. You do not deserve to be in America.

Report this

By cyrena, August 12, 2008 at 1:14 am #

By Harry, August 11 at 12:00 pm reponse to Cyrena

Millions and Millions all over the globe with 10 million right here in America huh. Sounds like a disinformation propaganda campaign to me. Care to prove this or provide citation that can back this vomit up?

~~~~~~

Well, unregistered Harry, one would have to be blind or totally illiterate not to see the ‘proof’ and citations everywhere around them.

Frank Cajone has provided some resources for you here, and he thinks my estimate in probably low. He’s probably right.

~~~
“…By Frank Cajon, August 11 at 7:54 pm
In response to the challenge to Cyrena’s assertion, be it on topic or not, to the effect that America during the Bush dictatorship has slaughtered people around the globe and left, counting Americans tens of millions homeless and destitute-a statement that has furrowed the brow of at least one blogger here-I think the number is a low estimate and that the allusion to a ‘proof’ necessary is a close as a drive to the nearest urban center in the US, the morning newspaper, the foreclosure statistics in the realty markets, and the mass graves in Iraq. Open your eyes.
So, just start with a newspaper Harry, any one will do, though you can’t stop there, since the media has clearly performed as a Ministry of Propaganda for the Dick Bush Dictatorship. Be that as it may, it’s a good start. Take a drive or walk down the hill from you castle, (which will eventually come down at some point) and check out the nearest urban (or even rural center). Check out the list of the 10 fastest dying towns/cities in America. (rural towns have evaporated into literal ghost towns)

Check the latest unemployment stats Harry, and double them for a real figure. Note the 14 airlines that have recently collapsed, along with several banks. Let’s not forget Bear Steans which the taxpayer’s have bailed out, or Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.

As for the destruction of Iraq, that link is right here on TD, so you must only do selective posting of your own propaganda here.

http://www.truthdig.com/avbooth/item/20080810_city_of_walls/?ln

Then there are all the dead and wounded from Iraq and Afghanistan, that started out HERE. Did ya maybe forget about all of them? Yeah, yeah, I know. The active military and their families who’ve lost their futures as a result of fighting in aggressive wars for profit only make up what..10% of the US population? I mean, it’s basically the same ones that we keep recycling though there, with occasional new additions to try to keep up with the attrition rate..attrition due to the thousands of deaths, (4,174 to date) and the HUNDREDS of thousands of ‘wounded’ who remain untreated, and are likely to be found living on the streets, or maybe hanging around the nearest Veterans Center, where those haven’t been closed down.

Disinformation propaganda campaign Harry? NOT. We might call your presence here a very pathetic attempt to prevent such information from surfacing, but that’s a lost cause. Too many folks are living this REALITY now, and you can’t tell them that they aren’t.


So, check that out Harry. See if your eyes tell your brain that it’s propaganda. Tell the last batch of 500,000 that those foreclosure eviction notices are just propaganda. I’m sure they’ll be convinced. Tell the same thing to the person who might still have a job, when they try to buy gas to get to it. Just tell them that those numbers there on the pumps are ‘just propaganda’, and that they don’t have to pay for the stuff. Then watch what happens when they believe you.

As Frank suggests, maybe you could just open your own eyes, and you’ll get all of the citations you need.

Report this

By Frank Cajon, August 11, 2008 at 11:54 pm #

In response to the challenge to Cyrena’s assertion, be it on topic or not, to the effect that America during the Bush dictatorship has slaughtered people around the globe and left, counting Americans tens of millions homeless and destitute-a statement that has furrowed the brow of at least one blogger here-I think the number is a low estimate and that the allusion to a ‘proof’ necessary is a close as a drive to the nearest urban center in the US, the morning newspaper, the foreclosure statistics in the realty markets, and the mass graves in Iraq. Open your eyes. We are a third-rate world power with the nuclear weaponry of what once was the greatest nation on Earth, with one of the world’s highest murder rates, the most convicts in prison, highest trade deficit, most hand guns, and a crumbling infrastructure that has wasted away while the national debt has been increased 55% under the fascist regime in power since seizing power in the 2000 coup.
I remain convinced that all this and the lies behind it do not, however, make it all right for our leaders (or those who in their own grandiose world view think of themselves such) to be excused for having the morals of an unfixed feral alley cat.

Report this

By Bill Witherup, August 11, 2008 at 11:13 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

In a time of so many idiots walking around blathering on their cell phones, or text messaging, it is a relief to read Chris Hedges’ prose on Edwards. No fat, a witty opening, and accurate cultural insight.

Report this

By colin2626262, August 11, 2008 at 10:31 pm #

In his book, “War is a Force that Gives us Meaning,” Hedges writes about the relation between pornography and violence—that is, the evil of lust and the evil of killing.  He seems to contradict himself in this article.  Also, the Hitler reference could easily be countered with a reference to Gandhi, who was also abstemious and a vegetarian.  The Hindus call chastity brahmacharya, meaning the search for God.  That’s the literal meaning.  The other meaning is chastity in thought, word and deed, which Gandhi said was the only way for a person to be nonviolent.

Report this

By radiodujour, August 11, 2008 at 10:19 pm #

The real problem is that we have these endless debates about why the Democrats can’t win the national electons when the truth is that they have been winning but the elections are rigged.

Easy solution . . . take back the elections.

Report this

By yellowbird2525, August 11, 2008 at 8:36 pm #

clinton’s were afraid Edwards would be chosen for VP; it’s one of their tricks; and no one cares; it’s kinda like the “hollywood fluff” they keep trying to jam down our throats when what we the people want is HONEST TO GOD NEWS MEDIA COVERAGE that alerts us to the TRUTH not the “mrs Bush goes to wonderful Afghanistan & all is well” when in reality 2 weeks later they are pulling troops there cuz of the “hotbed”; which if you had any independent media access at all such as http://www.democracynow.org you would have seen that a Pakistanian man was telling us that we the citizens of the USA are being GIVEN FALSE PICTURES, etc; that the Al Quida are small & have few if any guns (in case you missed the fact that there was no link ever found between Saddam/Iraq/& Al quida; NONE; there was a blurb in the news shortly after saying “the Sunni want to be known as” and poor McCain couldn’t remember if it was the Sunni’s or the Shiites the Gov had decided to “sell” the idea to the citizens of USA who the “big bad Al Quieda” were to be; the Shiites were the ones who said it was a dictatorship (USA set up Gov & Corp’s that work with them); we want PEOPLE, CITIZENS with a PASSION for the PEOPLE & the COUNTRY of the USA; we the people are FED UP with garbage, inside of the WH, in Cesspool Congress, & the parasitic Pentagon folks who amazingly enuf were 50% short of staff; & the ones who always over pay the contractors who WERE there happened to be in the clear of the airplane hitting it; they were “prepping” for a strike to the Pentagon by an airplane; wasn’t THAT a “coincidence”;

Report this

By Frank Cajon, August 11, 2008 at 7:46 pm #

Edwards deserves no free pass here. No, he isn’t Herr Bush slaughtering a generation and destroying America’s future, but no one says he is. What he is: another in a long line of Democrats who can’t keep their zippers up, lie about it compulsively, and betray the trust of millions of people who voted for him for VP and in the primaries. His wife has a terminal, systemic disease, and yet he has not hesitated to likely impregnate (none of these fools ever heard of a condom, or their Freedom of Choice mates The Pill) a woman just to get his rocks off, plain and simple. If you can’t keep your marriage vows, or, like Herr Bush, will compulsively lie to cover any previous lie, what in the hell are you doing asking people to entrust you with the ability to make decisions that can result in World War III or failure of our economy? Lately, it seems hard to find a Democrat of note who has not had a tacky affair with a female other than their wife, or a Republican one that has not done similar with a male (or taken a bribe). Blaming this on media sensationalism is not right. The first thing we deserve from our leaders is trust and honesty and we are not getting it from most of them, either side of the aisle. Shame on Edwards, he and the others (Craig, the list goes on) who can’t keep it in their pants deserve their political ruin.
On the same subject, just what in the HELL are the Democrats doing giving an entire evening of their convention to Bubba Clinton after his ruin of the party for a few quick head jobs? The man is a disgrace as is his wife, and the Jackasses might as well have Edwards give the keynote address if they are going to let this fool and his wife have the key spots on two straight nights in a celebration of how politics and morals don’t mix.

Report this

By Kashilinus, August 11, 2008 at 6:02 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Such a tentative tip of the hat toward the single knight on a white horse on the political landscape - Ralph Nader.

Report this

By Harry, August 11, 2008 at 4:00 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Yes. Look at Cyrena’s Propoganda!!!!!!!!!

“We’re slaughtering people all over the globe, and the amount of money and resources used to conduct the destruction has left 10 of millions of Americans (in addition to the millions in the Middle East and elsewhere) homeless, hungry, and virtually destitute.”
Millions and Millions all over the globe with 10 million right here in America huh. Sounds like a disinformation propaganda campaign to me.  Care to prove this or provide citation that can back this vomit up?

Report this

By rowman, August 11, 2008 at 3:45 pm #

************

Re: cyrena, August 10 at 10:12 pm #

By “regime” you must be referring to both the democrat and republican parties. They both control this country and each is guilty. They are equally corrupt, equally inept and equally under the control of corporations.

So… why do you continue to pump the democrat propaganda here?

Report this

By ocjim, August 11, 2008 at 3:35 pm #

If anyone needs proof that the media has failed miserably in informing the public but scored high marks for promoting the superficial, a real study was done.
  The National Media Watch Group (FAIR) studied primary election coverage on the nightly broadcast network newscasts (ABC World News, CBS Evening News and NBC Nightly News) in the six weeks leading up to February 5, 2008, often referred to this year as “Super-Duper Tuesday,” when 24 states held primaries or caucuses.
  It designated category codes: Issues, Campaign Analysis/Strategy, Biography, News, Polls/Voter Mood, Human Interest/Local Color and Media/Advertising. The 385 stories were put into these categories.
  In summary, a full 88 percent dealt with either the how of elections, with news or with polls.
  Five percent, or 19 of the 385, were dominated by issues. Sixty-five percent involved a dominance of Campaign Analysis/Strategy (the “how” of getting elected).
  Human rights issues get very little coverage. Passage of the FISA bill, which provides immunity for the telecoms that cooperated with the National Security Agency’s illegal surveillance over the past six years, hardly gets mention. Furthermore, there is little commentary on Obama’s or McCain’s intention to sign it. It’s as though the dismantling of our freedoms has little importance in our corporate world.
  Then there is the quagmire in Iraq. Its coverage, is, compared to last year, quite sparse. With the neo-conservatives declaring a surge victory, the media seemed to completely lose interest.
  According to data compiled by Andrew Tyndall, a television consultant who monitors the three network evening newscasts, coverage of Iraq has been “massively scaled back this year.” Nearly halfway into 2008, the three newscasts have shown 181 weekday minutes of Iraq coverage, compared with 1,157 minutes for all of 2007, making the 2008 coverage the equivalent of somewhere around 365 minutes, or less than one-third of 2007.
  So where is the Fourth Estate now? Perhaps the term no longer has a meaning in today’s corporate America. It is a term which has always referred to the press, both in its explicit capacity of advocacy for the people and in its implicit ability to frame political issues.
  Clearly its advocacy is for corporations, and its frame or intent is one of plutocratic rule, disburser of agenda-based information, and supplier of entertainment.

Report this

By Gmonst, August 11, 2008 at 2:56 pm #

The war crimes of our politicians and the sexual indiscretions of our politicians are not mutually exclusive.  They should both be news.  A lot of people on here are bemoaning the media coverage of this, yet we all read the headline and took a look.  People are interested in sex, and the fall of important people.  That’s nothing new and its not going to ever go away.  It should be covered along with the other things.  It doesn’t make sense to me to say don’t cover this, only cover that, news is about ratings, and sex always sells. 

As if a major presidential candidate/former vice presidential candidate having an affair and lying about it is not newsworthy.  Please, Chis Hedges really misses the mark here.  Its not about the public needing to think they are better than us, but as good as us.  We are not all lying adulterers hypocritically condemning others for crimes we are guilty of.  Its about the lack of honesty and disrespect toward the public by blatantly lying to them.  I am married and I work through all the problems of my marriage and I don’t disrespect my wife by cheating on her.  I expect politicians to have the same level of moral control.  I personally don’t care about his sex life, but that he is the kind of person he portrays himself as being.  If he portrays himself as a committed and loving husband, but is really a cheating dog, spending campaign contributions on his flings, then we should be fully informed.  If people find that more interesting than war is not that surprising, after all sex is exciting and war is depressing.  However, its not really about sex, but about dishonesty and trust.

I would also note, that having watched a lot of the olympics the last couple of days (a rare look into the mainstream networks for me) and I have heard about the conflict in Georgia many times, and even saw George Bush interviewed and asked about that and Chinese Human rights issues.  Yet, not a single mention of Edwards.

Report this

By Gmonst, August 11, 2008 at 2:53 pm #

The war crimes of our politicians and the sexual indiscretions of our politicians are not mutually exclusive.  They should both be news.  A lot of people on here are bemoaning the media coverage of this, yet we all read the headline and took a look.  People are interested in sex, and the fall of important people.  That’s nothing new and its not going to ever go away.  It should be covered along with the other things.  It doesn’t make sense to me to say don’t cover this, only cover that, news is about ratings, and sex always sells. 

As if a major presidential candidate/former vice presidential candidate having an affair and lying about it is not newsworthy.  Please, Chis Hedges really misses the mark here.  Its not about the public needing to think they are better than us, but as good as us.  We are not all lying adulterers hypocritically condemning others for crimes we are guilty of.  Its about the lack of honesty and disrespect toward the public by blatantly lying to them.  I am married and I work through all the problems of my marriage and I don’t disrespect my wife by cheating on her.  I expect politicians to have the same level of moral control.  I personally don’t care about his sex life, but that he is the kind of person he portrays himself as being.  If he portrays himself as a committed and loving husband, but is really a cheating dog, spending campaign contributions on his flings, then we should be fully informed. If people find that more interesting than war is not that surprising, after all sex is exciting and war is depressing.  However, its not really about sex, but about dishonesty and trust.

I would also note, that having watched a lot of the olympics the last couple of days (a rare look into the mainstream networks for me) and I have heard about the conflict in Georgia many times, and even saw George Bush interviewed and asked about that and Chinese Human rights issues.  Yet, not a single mention of Edwards.

Report this

By Harry, August 11, 2008 at 1:55 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Cyrena,
Please, another rambling diatribe..
Do you think you could possible contain your thoughts to perhaps a few sentences?
I know your lost in all this but you can at least fake it when you constrain yourself to as few words as possible. The more you write, the more you look foolish.
I know this might be a little harsh but it’s for your own good and hurts me more than you.

Report this

By Hemi*, August 11, 2008 at 1:39 pm #

Truth and accountability are what have piqued interests in the Edwards’ affair. Whereas the new governor of New York had the good sense (some might think otherwise) to put all of his sexual exploits on the table when first appointed. I don’t remember much furor over the news of his tawdry exploits. The citizens knew what they were getting and dealt in a mature civilized manner with the news. Truth has a way of disarming people.

Edwards was portrayed as the fair-haired, caring, Christian family man by himself, his wife and his staff (pardon the pun). No, he never claimed perfection but we were led to expect that at least familial fidelity was not at question. Supporters expected the good works promised by Edwards would not be undermined by a personal affair and that campaign donations would not be sidetracked to support such an affair, that strong possibility has been mentioned by “thebeerdoctor” and “mackTN”.

Horn dog playboys can serve the public, I mentioned Governor Paterson of New York. He was at least bright enough to diffuse his own image. I think we are better able to deal with a public servant that is imperfect by admission rather than perfect by illusion. The Edwards affair had/has been simmering for some time. A lot of fair-haired propaganda went out and a lot of misled donations came in during that time. He never came forward out of good conscience, he was caught later. That makes a difference.

Just for a moment consider his campaign succeeded and he was elected president. I for one would be concerned that a sitting president would have to deal with his former mistress and love child while juggling larger issues. Not that that has never happened but I would rather not sign on for that ride.

Dorothy was pretty pissed seeing the man behind the curtain (at least as pissed as one could be in a 1939 film). Nobody likes a humbug.

Report this

By sns, August 11, 2008 at 12:56 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

hey chris who cares what you can or can’t stomach? if shrub wants to be ridden let him, if he craves anal sex that’s his right too!

please write something not too obvious for a change.

Report this

By Alan, August 11, 2008 at 11:36 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

This sort of sordid affair is a further illustration
of the obvious, the rupertization of America has
remoulded the American polity into a sitcom.
Well, maybe it was always that way except for
a few brief periods:
Abolitionism, Reform, The New Deal.

Report this

By iska, August 11, 2008 at 10:04 am #

Chris Hedges would make an atheist say “amen!” to this

Report this

By mackTN, August 11, 2008 at 9:56 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

cyrena—most of the time, we’re in agreement but not now.  For some reason, my left friends think that admonishing Edwards’ behavior and looking into misdeeds is a distraction from the real problems of the world.  That insults my intelligence.

This woman was hired by the campaign to produce videos for $114,000.  No one is disputing that.  Fred Baron, Edward’s campaign manager, according to Edwards himself, relocated this woman and her boyfriend to the other side of the country and put them in multimillion dollar homes and pays them thousands of dollars each month because, he says,he felt sorry for them.  (As campaign manager of a poor people’s campaign, I’m baffled at how his sympathy prompts such generosity for these two and not for real victims without homes.) 

Baron says campaign finance money is not being used and has not been used for these sympathy payments he’s making without Edward’s knowledge. 

As long as campaign finance money has not been used for this dalliance, case closed as far as I’m concerned.  Although, yes—it sure as heck bothers me that the populist piper is not what he appeared to be.  Heck, Ralph Nader had endorsed him.

Edwards’ behavior represents just the kind of disrepect, shallowness, dishonesty that afflicts most politicians—Dems and Republicans. It explains why we have a democratic congress with 20% approval rating, and why New Orleans is still under water. It demonstrates why Libby can be pardoned, why Cheney stuffs his pockets with impunity. 

It’s not me that’s distracted—it’s our elected officials who take their eyes off the ball and don’t do what they are paid handsomely to do. 

Minimizing this potentially criminal act if campaign funds were used for this affair doesn’t do this country any good.  It has nothing to do with Obama, with the election.  But I supported Edwards in spirit, and to find out that he’s a false prophet is devastating.  (But I allow Edwards to make this up in community service, providing pro bono legal help to all those victims whose cause he promoted.)

I want leaders who are what they say they are, who are ethical, who respect citizens and who don’t fritter away the public trust.  I sure hope Obama is that leader.

Report this

By purplewolf, August 11, 2008 at 9:41 am #

The description in the first paragraph reminds me of the movie, ” Land of the Blind,” with Donald Sutherland as a political prisoner who eventually gets released and then over throws the current rulers, having them killed after he and some soldiers break into the bedrooms of the infantile ruler and his wife having kinky sex as depicted in this opening article. He then takes over the country to become even more repressive and evil than the former ruler he overthrew. If only art imitates life in this case.

Greg Bacon, loved the merger of CNN and the National Inquirer.

Anyone remember the Chandra Levy/Gary Condit-that’s all you heard on the fixed news before 9-11 happened, then it was on to another infantile sex scandal after that. As the rest of the world comments on Americans, we have a six year olds view of sex, very immature and childish. It’s time to grow up already, if it is not to late, and see what is really going on in the real world. Besides, other peoples sex lives should be private and not public, as long as they are not child molesters or habitual real sex crime offenders.

Report this

By cyrena, August 11, 2008 at 2:12 am #

By Noah, August 9 at 3:43 pm

•  “..But I would argue that the media focuses on sex scandals and makes them the pinnacle of evildoing deliberately and intentionally, to desensitize us to the greater crimes being committed - the foremost being war.”

This is a bulls eye observation Noah. Others on the thread have alluded to this, but you go much further, and some of us can certainly appreciate your insight. It is clear. You continue..

•  “…I see every bad deed of the media, including the sensationalism and triviality of current “news”, as a deliberate effort to destroy the last vestiges of sensitivity and activism within that segment of the general population that has a conscience, and to discourage us from speaking out or having hope…”

Few have said it better. I would add that this is a long, long, long, practiced habit of any authoritarian state in the making. In fact, it is THE POINT…to desensitize, specifically to DEHUMANIZE on a mass level. It’s very intentional. It breaks the ‘classes’ into masses, who are far more easily controlled. This always brings me back to my question of so many, many years ago, when I was first learning about the German Holocaust, and shortly later, the similar atrocities of the Stalin regime. I couldn’t understand how so many millions of people could be so meekly and compliantly marched to their deaths, (like dummies) without anybody else saying or doing anything. The entire population had been totally desensitized; the result being the Banality of Evil, that we can as easily reverse to what we see now as the Evil of Banality.

We’re slaughtering people all over the globe, and the amount of money and resources used to conduct the destruction has left 10 of millions of Americans (in addition to the millions in the Middle East and elsewhere) homeless, hungry, and virtually destitute. Yet, we hear the constant gripes about the $114,000 dollars that was allegedly provided to this woman (no proof of that anywhere, or even where it came from) and more and more tales of how this one event, by one man, has somehow destroyed the Democratic party. It’s like, never mind that 5 million pound bomb that’s about to drop on your head, just count those pennies, and then, count them again for good measure. Never mind the TRILLIONS being spent in Iraq to build billion dollar embassies, and the hundreds of military bases, or the prisons, or any of that. Never mind that. Just keep your careful eye on the campaign funds of the guy who didn’t have enough of the same, to make the grade.

It would seem (in my opinion) that this is the now recognized reaction of a population under siege..terrorized by the forces of a totalitarian regime. It isn’t new. It’s the product of the destabilization of a society, and PROPAGANDA ALWAYS works well. Just distract what have by now become ‘the masses’ so they can’t or won’t pay attention to the context of the realities.

And yes…it serves this purpose as well..

•  “And of course, such reporting also serves to propel those without conscience into even more rabid support of wars, and to throw the general public into greater and greater ignorance and hopelessness…”

That’s what propaganda is designed to do, and this regime has used it as effectively as any other of the monsters of the past. The more ignorant the general public can be rendered the more control the dictators have. They can say, ‘look over here, and not over there’, and it works every time.

It’s a constant exercise of “Wag the Dog” as several other posters have noted just on this thread..the sailing of the Armada to create the Naval blockade of the Persian Gulf that will kick into full swing, more war in the Middle East. Then we’ve got the escalating war between Georgia and Russia, where thousands have already been killed. And every day, there are more and more homeless people on the streets of all US communities.

All of that said Noah, DO NOT give up.

Report this

By Matuskaze Kid, August 10, 2008 at 11:44 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

You diminish your argument by highlighting “homosexual encounters in airport bathrooms.” For every “homosexual enounter” in airport bathrooms how many “heterosexual encounters” occur in airports? I know, you’re in the the majority, but that doesn’t mean that you should stop thinking.

Report this

By mackTN, August 10, 2008 at 7:21 pm #

beerdoctor you got it right!
“By thebeerdoctor, August 10 at 11:38 am #


It is not the screwing, it is the money. The $ 114,000 of his campaign funds used to set up Ms. Hunter’s phony job as a documentary film maker. “

This money contributed by real victims of poverty and homelessness, Hurricane Katrina victims, subprime predator victims—to pay the salaries of the goodtime girl and his proxy, Andrew Young.  This is a terrible betrayal and disrespect for those supporters.

But John’s budddy feels so sorry for them—not for the Hurricane Katrina victims, for Hunter and Young—that he relocates them on the other side of the country and puts each of them multimillion dollar houses and gives them allowances of $15000month.

In a campaign about the misery of poverty, this buddy’s sympathy seems misplaced.  How many Hurricane Katrina victims could he have helped with that money? 

Why not just help Hunter and Young get jobs and an apartment…or even a Fema trailer, which is good enough for other Americans.

From beerdoctor: “Elizabeth Edwards does not fare well in this matter either.
According to her, she knew the affair was going on before he started his presidential campaign.”

Yes, I’m beginning to wonder too—perhaps that decision to reveal the coming demise of Mrs Edwards helped deflect mounting attention away from this story.

This is exactly what’s wrong with the govt and elected officials who seem easily distracted from taking care of the people’s business and who use their access for personal advantages. 

I don’t care who these people screw—just do it on your own time with your own money.  If this story had just been Edwards screwing Hunter with NO MONEY INVOLVED then it would have been their private affair.

Report this

By tomhanna, August 10, 2008 at 4:49 pm #

I’m a conservative - how I ended up here, I don’t know - so while I don’t agree with your litany of the sins of the Bush administration, your point that policy is more important than sex is right on the money.  Edwards is already a has been who couldn’t win the Vice Presidency, couldn’t win reelection to the Senate and couldn’t win the Presidency. Who, other than Elizabeth, cares who he sleeps with? 

I’d change the picture you opened with though…Harry Reid being ridden around the Capitol Rotunda by Nancy Pelosi would be fine with me if they’d allow an up or down vote on a comprehensive energy policy that included environmentally safe drilling in the OCS.

Report this

By thebeerdoctor, August 10, 2008 at 3:38 pm #

It is not the screwing, it is the money. The $ 114,000 of his campaign funds used to set up Ms. Hunter’s phony job as a documentary film maker. The videos produced were not going to win any awards. Edwards in his interview lied about this, saying his personal relations with Hunter came after she was hired to make the documentaries. This was not the case. After months of humping around, Edwards created the job to legitimize her presence on the campaign.
Elizabeth Edwards does not fare well in this matter either.
According to her, she knew the affair was going on before he started his presidential campaign. In other words, stand by your man even when he is lying through his teeth?
Chris Hedges point is well taken, but he is only preaching to the choir. The United States can be a brutal place that simply does not care about Iraqi deaths or the torture of prisoners. Violence is thought of as a solution. Repression of sex, does not need to be a crime, it is worse, it is considered to be sin. Sanctimonious politicians all play the game, with all that jive about family values until somebody’s pecker gets caught in the nookie jar.

Report this

By 911truthdotorg, August 10, 2008 at 2:32 pm #

This is why I don’t like Edwards.

He KNOWS what happened on 9/11 and is involved with the cover-up. Which makes him a mass murderer along with the rest of the bush crime family.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFh5F9HpsPc

Report this

By Joe Krasovec Jr, August 10, 2008 at 1:54 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Mr Hedges: I shared your dislike of Edwards but did not realize why until I read your excellent words:
“I never liked Edwards. He is all flash and sparkle with his boyish $400 haircuts and oily sincerity.”
Thanks, Joe

Report this

By Rev.St.Huck, August 10, 2008 at 1:48 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I agree with the article wholeheartedly—I’d rather my president f*** some skanky blonde than f*** the rest of us. 

But who cares about John Edwards?  Spitzer, Craig, Clinton—all were in office when their indiscretions happened.  John was a private citizen again.  He was a three time loser who was never going to be president or vice president—his political career was over.  This was totally irrelevant to anyone except John and Elisabeth.

Report this

By Greg Bacon, August 10, 2008 at 12:20 pm #

CNN and National Inquirer announced today that they would merge their operations.

A spokesman was quoted as saying, “Why not? Hell, we already cover the same trashy stories that have no educational value.
Why fight over the limited space in the gutter “infotainment” groups like us, FOX and CNN, share?”

Wall Street was exuberant over the news, with stocks gaining a new low.
This, an analyst noted, was due to the fact that nearly all the traders were preoccupied with watching the latest tawdry reports about John Edwards on all 24 hour “News Channels.”

Next on CNN, Wolf Blitzer hosts a stunning documentary on the real story behind the headlines about how aliens kidnapped the love child of Britney Spears and OJ Simpson.

Elsewhere in the news, that loud sound heard across the nation today was America heaving a collective barf.

Report this

By constitutionaldemocracy, August 10, 2008 at 11:51 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

The real scandal that never was reported and was pulled off the air after a special that 60 minutes did on the story… is really what needs to be discussed.

http://www.thelawparty.com/FranklinCoverup/franklin.htm
http://www.thelawparty.com/FranklinCoverup/wtpage1small.gif

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=franklin+cover+up+scandal&btnG=Google+Search

Report this

By PatrickHenry, August 10, 2008 at 11:50 am #

Gary Hart comes to mind. 

The good people of Washington reelected Marion Barry as a councilman after a Federal crack cocaine sting, DWI and other minor run-ins put him out of office as Mayor.  There’s likely a federal task force following him around night and day to further embarass and harass him.

Point is that no matter what you do the voters can forgive and reelect you, especially if you truely have their interests at heart.

Report this

By G.Anderson, August 10, 2008 at 11:31 am #

There won’t be much left of America after our coming war with Iran, so it won’t really matter who wins the election anyway.

Report this

By rowman, August 10, 2008 at 11:27 am #

It’s a black eye for the Democratic Party trying to run on a platform of “Change” and Edwards put this in the public for consumption to prove the party hypocrisy. Too bad for him and the dem party.

As much as some of you would like this to go away and not be an issue, you have to come to terms with reality. The Democratic Party does not in any way represent any form of change. It is the same old politik.

The Dem party is so inept, they are trying to replay and old republican trick of buying votes.  Offering every citizen a $1000 check and an additional 864 Billion to faith based initiatives. The first usurps the laws of this country. The second, well let’s just say that many of you cried about this when Bush did it but it’s ok when Obama does it. He calls McCain a racist with absolutely no base or justification and his people are pumping plenty of propaganda.

Neither the Democrats or Republicans can offer change.  They prove every day that they offer the same ol b.s. but some of you are blinded as the republican supporters of Bush before you. The writing is on the wall and if you support either of these parties, you have only yourself to blame…

Report this

By Jim Yell, August 10, 2008 at 10:14 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

I was going to make this short, but the censor has refused to allow submission.

My comment was to say “This article has said it all and that it is a shame that the news is making so much about nothing, as usual”

Report this

By Allan Krueger, August 10, 2008 at 9:33 am #

This story shows the mind set and intelligence of the population of this country. Last time I looked, having an affair wasn’t a crime. If you don’t lie about it under oath, it IS NOT A CRIME! Just another distraction to keep the populace from considering the real problems of this country and whether we (as a nation) want FOUR MORE YEARS OF BUSH, ONLY WORSE! All of you NeoCONS vote for McWORSE and see what happens!

Report this

By Paul_GA, August 10, 2008 at 8:07 am #

Y’know, for all his faults, Bill Clinton wasn’t such a bad president, after all, compared to George Dubya Bush.

Report this

By radiodujour, August 10, 2008 at 1:32 am #

John Edwards was the best of the annointed candidates . . . google “John Edwards Bilderberg”.

Report this

By mrmb, August 10, 2008 at 12:30 am #
(Unregistered commenter)

Big B,

Right on. An uninformed populace who are hooked on the narcotics of sensationalism, sexual escapades, and other irrelevant issues are the perfect tools and fools in the hands of dishonest, immoral, corrupt, power hungary elite. What else could they ask for?

We are such a perfect, docile bunch!!!

Report this

By G.Anderson, August 10, 2008 at 12:07 am #

I don’t think that it’s any coincidence that Edwards is the top story.. especially since the affair has been public knowledge since at least last October.

While the public is finding out about this sad little affair, the Armada is on it’s way to Iran, for a naval blockade. The Iranian’s have already said they will consider this an act of war.

Those Neo Con’s will do Anything to drive up the price of oil..

Report this

By Clark, August 9, 2008 at 11:58 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

I apologize for what I am about to post.
A joke?

If John McCain and Barack Obama were in distantly separated places, alone, and each was on the verge of orgasm. would there be any sound?

Answer;

Yes, but Senator Lieberman is always discrete.

Again, I apologize.

Report this

By cooper, August 9, 2008 at 11:51 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Written like a poet weary and disappointed with the truth.

Well done.

Report this

By reunionpi, August 9, 2008 at 11:13 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Andrew Young the admitted father of the John Edwards story:    The arrests for worthless checks, DWI, burglary, criminal mischief, the federal tax lien

webofdeception.com

Report this

By GW=MCHammered, August 9, 2008 at 10:51 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Right on, Mister hedges! The media spotlights celebritizing candidates and climaxed Johns even as the nation is sodomized by a Bush.

“No matter who wins this election, the next administration will inherit the mess: $10 trillion in debt, two of these wars, stagnating paychecks, growing inequality. What’s the first thing each of you would like to see the next administration do, whether it’s McCain or Obama?”
Bill Moyers

http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/blog/2008/08/bill_moyers_asks_what_should_t.html

Report this

By Big B, August 9, 2008 at 10:47 pm #

Here’s a slice of Americana for you;
Last night, as I sat in a local diner with my wife, I glanced over at the ever present TV in the corner. The CBS evening news was about to begin and I casually said to my Wife “Oh, by the way, did you hear Russia and Georgia were at war?” My beautiful better half, never being the news hound I am, muttered “good! maybe they’ll burn Atlanta down again!” After everyone in the diner enjoyed a guffaw over my Bride’s sometimes cryptic wit, I blurted out “just wait, the lead story on the evening news will be John Edwards affair.” Much to my satisfied chagrin, the lead story was about the whole sordid Edwards affair. You would think that a potential regional war between bitter rivals and nuclear powers in the former Russian republics would have held more weight than the sad, selatious details of yet another American politico (ex-politico) getting caught sticking his dick in something other than his wife. But alas, this is America, and we Americans tend to gravitate towards the lowest common denominator. By the way, while all of this is going on, the US is still torturing innocent men, preparing for yet another war in Iran, supporting brutal dictators all over the globe, and yes, ignoring a little war in the Caspians. Maybe we here in America would pay more attention to the real problems in the world if they were printed on the cover of the National Equirer,with lots of pictures, so we don’t lose focus.

Report this

By Washington Bubble, August 9, 2008 at 9:43 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Heavyrunner, while I try not to think in a conspiracy sort of way but the way this has been presented in the media I can’t help but to see a whole bunch of red flags.  If everything that is being reported about the suspect in the anthrax case is true it would be_impossible to have a goverment clearance for the work that he did.  Of course, silly me, I’m assuming that you need goverment clearence to work in a goverment lab with anthrax involved.  I’ve had my share of goverment clearences and I will say that it takes a long time to get one and they go through everything before giving you one.  Should you have even the slightest infraction with the law after gaining clearance you will be contacted by the agency.  I never had any issue but I’ve seen my share of people that have, before or after the fact.  If this guy was stalking anyone or had any other issues they goverment would be all over him.  Knowing this alone makes me question all the stories that have come out on the anthrax suspect..I suspect there is more to the story that we will never know but the story that is out there has a few holes in it. 

  As far as Edwards goes I find it disappointing..but why I should be I don’t know. Its all standard practice for ego driven, type A personalities that litter the political landscape.  Its very sad that these types of people make up our political system.  I’m sure there are a few goods one mixed in but for the most part I’m afraid that what we, the US public, is subjected to is alot of people that only have their own self interests at heart.  What’s amazing is that in this case he had a potentially great political career which he just shot in the foot, at least for now..the US public has a short attention span so I’m sure in a few weeks all will be forgotten.  I agree that I don’t care if he did barnyard animals as long as he was upfront with that instead of presenting yourself as something else.  I’m tired of self-rightous politicians getting caught with their hand in the cookie jar and then speaking of forgiveness and how they repented.  It reminds me of “Doonebury” in the mid-70’s, Jeb Magruder being asked when he realized the error of his ways for his part in the Watergate break-ins. He stated somewhere around April, (or May, can’t quite recall) which was when he was caught by the Fed’s.  This is once again the same thing we’ve seen over and over..once caught then they see the error of their ways.  We deserve better from our politicans and we should expect it.

Report this

By lawlessone, August 9, 2008 at 9:41 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Once again, the only crime Republicans and Main Stream Media recognize is a sex crime.

Rape the environment? Loot the Treasury? Dump the wife for someone richer to finance the campaign?  Violate oaths of office?  Ignore codified rules and regulations and laws with open arrogance?  Lie to just about everyone on just about everything?  Kill women and child by the container load?  Heck, boys will be boys.

But, consensual sex between an adult male and an adult female.  String him up!  That’s IMMORAL.

Report this

By heavyrunner, August 9, 2008 at 8:46 pm #

The admission by the government that the anthrax for the letters came from a government office seems to be a bigger story than the way it has been played so far.

Those letters came with scrawled notes designed to forward the agenda of war with Iraq.  They were a part of the scheme of 9/11 to manipulate the American people with fear.

And we now know the anthrax in them came from a government facility. 

We cannot allow that to just go down the memory hole!

Report this

By mackTN, August 9, 2008 at 8:15 pm #

Like Chris, I am dismayed with the performance of our elected officials, most all whom behave egotistically, arrogantly, narcissiticly when doing the people’s business.  Ask them a direct question and you get hooey in return.  Our taxpayer money is misused egregiously, providing pork for projects that are outlandish.  Right now, people as consumers are being ripped off with impunity by corporations—inflated fees, deceptive mortgages, outlandish gas prices that are allowed to rise and fall on whims.

Sex has nothing to do with it, Chris. I wouldn’t care of Edwards went to bed with a goat—as long as he didn’t use my donations to rent the room. 

Edwards took up the mantle of poverty crusader, surrounding himself with the tragic victims of Hurricane Katrina, of racism, of the targets of predatory lenders.  Those people responded to his solicitations for campaign funds to promote an important message and his quest for the presidency.

But does his best buddy feel as sorry for them as he apparently did for Edwards’ squeeze and her supposed boyfriend?  No, his sympathy overflows for Hunter etal, prompting him to help them relocate not to a modest home or Fema trailer but to multimillion dollar residences on the other side of the country and to further pay them thousands of dollars a month…forever?  Why not just help them get jobs?

My campaign donations helped pay the salary of this woman—$114,000.  My credentials and background would have qualified me for such a job.  I’ve worked on campaigns.  It’s not easy to go f rom volunteer to paid staff. 

It doesn’t help to dismiss his behavior just because sex is part of the story when, in fact, sex has nothing to do with the errors committed by Edwards.  His behavior is no better than Bush’s who pardons Libby and gives all his buddys a pass.

Misusing campaign funds is a big deal, and Edwards knows it.  It is just this kind of dishonesty that leads to the bigger crimes against constituents and conspiracies to cover things up. 

The people’s money was disrespected and their issues tossed aside in the search for personal pleasure. 

As I said, he can do it with barnyard animals for all I care, just don’t ask me to pay for the barn.

Report this

By Noah, August 9, 2008 at 7:43 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Dear Chris,

It is certainly true that the public’s fascination with sex scandals is prurient and hypocritical; I myself have never been interested in them.

But I would argue that the media focuses on sex scandals and makes them the pinnacle of evildoing deliberately and intentionally, to desensitize us to the greater crimes being committed - the foremost being war.  This is also why war is described in terminology better suited for sports - like using words like “power play” and “firefight” rather than words like “slaughtered” or “blown to bits”.  I see every bad deed of the media, including the sensationalism and triviality of current “news”, as a deliberate effort to destroy the last vestiges of sensitivity and activism within that segment of the general population that has a conscience, and to discourage us from speaking out or having hope.  And of course, such reporting also serves to propel those without conscience into even more rabid support of wars, and to throw the general public into greater and greater ignorance and hopelessness.

The real question in my mind is this: how do we reach those who have no conscience?  Supporting nuclear war, for example, is not a product of ignorance, but indicates a deep and severe character flaw.  I’ve tried to speak out and convince such people that what they are promoting is evil; however, I’ve spoken to hundreds of people about this, and haven’t even come close to reaching one of them.  Such people really seem to be totally immutable and completely committed to a permanent state of war.

Report this

By simuvac, August 9, 2008 at 7:30 pm #
(Unregistered commenter)

Some sober analysis on Edwards’ affair.

Report this

Add Your Comment

Posts by unregistered readers are moderated. Posts by members
are published immediately. Why wait? Register today!







Number of characters remaining: 4000

Notify you when others comment on this article?


Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


Please read and abide by our comment policy.
By submitting this comment, you agree to this site's terms and conditions.

 
Click here to learn more about Truthdig
 

 
Join the Liberal Blog Advertising Network
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A Progressive Journal of News and Opinion. Editor, Robert Scheer. Publisher, Zuade Kaufman.
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C. All rights reserved.